Psychometrics of the Functional Oral Intake Scale for Children With Dysphagia

Nutritional Issues in Children with Dysphagia

(1) Background: Pediatric dysphagia presents significant nutritional challenges, often impacting growth and development due to reduced oral intake, increased nutritional needs, and gastrointestinal complications; (2) Methods: This prospective quasi-experimental study assessed 117 children under 14 years old (20 patients were under 1 year old, 80 were aged 1-7 years, and 17 were older than 7 years), diagnosed with swallowing disorders, to analyze their caloric, macro-, and micronutrient intake and identify potential deficiencies. The severity of dysphagia was established using functional oral intake scales, and dietary records were reviewed over a 3-day period; (3) Results: The study revealed that 39.8% of participants did not meet their total energy expenditure (TEE), highlighting a high prevalence of malnutrition among these children. Furthermore, patients using feeding devices exhibited a significantly lower caloric intake, and over half required significantly modified food textures. After individualized speech therapy and nutritional rehabilitation, participants showed significant improvements in caloric intake, with their energy coverage increasing from 958% to 1198% of the daily requirement. Rehabilitation also improved tolerance to a broader range of food textures; (4) Conclusions: This research underscores the importance of multidisciplinary, individualized nutritional strategies to address the specific challenges of pediatric dysphagia, emphasizing the role of enteral nutrition and therapeutic interventions in improving the quality of life and nutritional outcomes of these children. Further studies are recommended to assess the long-term impact of such strategies.

Development of a Medical Complexity Score for Pediatric Aerodigestive Patients

OBJECTIVE

To develop a complexity scoring system to characterize the diverse population served in pediatric aerodigestive clinics and help predict their treatment outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A 7-point medical complexity score was developed through an iterative group consensus of relative stakeholders to capture the spectrum of comorbidities among the aerodigestive population. One point was assigned for each comorbid diagnosis in the following categories: airway anomaly, neurologic, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genetic diagnoses, and prematurity. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients seen in the aerodigestive clinic who had ≥2 visits between 2017 and 2021. The predictive value of the complexity score for the selected outcome of feeding progression among children with dysphagia was analyzed with univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

We analyzed 234 patients with complexity scores assigned, showing a normal distribution (Shapiro Wilk P = .406) of the scores 1-7 (median, 4; mean, 3.50 ± 1.47). In children with dysphagia, there was waning success in the improvement of oral feeding with increasing complexity scores (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.84; P = .001). Tube-fed children with higher complexity scores were incrementally less likely to achieve full oral diet (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89; P = .01). On multivariable analysis, neurologic comorbidity (OR, 0.26; P < .001) and airway malformation (OR, 0.35; P = .01) were associated with a decreased likelihood to improve in oral feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a novel complexity score for the pediatric aerodigestive population that is easy to use, successfully stratifies diverse presentations, and shows promise as a predictive tool to assist in counseling and resource use.

Outcome of long gap esophageal atresia at 6 years: A prospective case control cohort study

BACKGROUND DATA

EA is the most frequent congenital esophageal malformation. Long gap EA remains a therapeutic challenge for pediatric surgeons. A case case-control prospective study from a multi-institutional national French data base was performed to assess the outcome, at age of 1 and 6 years, of long gap esophageal atresia (EA) compared with non-long gap EA/tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF). The secondary aim was to assess whether initial treatment (delayed primary anastomosis of native esophagus vs. esophageal replacement) influenced mortality and morbidity at ages 1 and 6 years.

METHODS

A multicentric population-based prospective study was performed and included all patients who underwent EA surgery in France from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. A comparative study was performed with non-long gap EA/TEF patients. Morbidity at birth, 1 year, and 6 years was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with long gap EA were compared with 62 non-long gap EA/TEF patients. At age 1 year, the long gap EA group had longer parenteral nutrition support and longer hospital stay and were significantly more likely to have complications both early post-operatively and before age 1 year compared with the non-long gap EA/TEF group. At 6 years, digestive complications were more frequent in long gap compared to non-long gap EA/TEF patients. Tracheomalacia was the only respiratory complication that differed between the groups. Spine deformation was less frequent in the long gap group. There were no differences between conservative and replacement groups at ages 1 and 6 years except feeding difficulties that were more common in the native esophagus group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long gap strongly influenced digestive morbidity at age 6 years.

Consensus on level descriptors for a functional children's eating and drinking activity scale

AIM

To agree wording of level descriptors for a measure of functional outcome of children's eating and drinking.

METHOD

An online, modified Delphi method was used to gather feedback on current level descriptor wording and generate rewording suggestions. Thirty speech and language therapists, working in a variety of settings and geographical locations, were invited to be part of the Delphi expert panel. Content analysis was used to evaluate participants' comments and develop consensus level descriptors. Consensus for acceptable wording was set at 80% agreement. Face validity was assessed using 5-point Likert scales.

RESULTS

Nineteen expert speech and language therapists (median experience 18 years) completed round one; 15 out of 19 completed round two. Level descriptor rating reached 80% agreement in two rounds. Additionally, 93% of participants agreed the scale would accurately capture change in their setting, with 87% likely to use the scale in practice.

INTERPRETATION

This study has produced agreed wording for a functional measure of eating and drinking activity suitable for use with paediatrics feeding disorders, regardless of disease aetiology, presentation, age, or setting. Potential for widespread use is supported. Further evaluation of the tool's reliability and validity is required.

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) study: the first report in children to evaluate the oropharyngeal dysphagia after esophageal atresia repair

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the swallowing problems by fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) study in both short- and long-gap patients after esophageal atresia (EA) repair.

METHODS

Hospital records of patients who had undergone surgery for EA were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as short-gap (SG) group (n:16) and long-gap (LG) group (n:10) to compare the swallowing problems. FEES study was performed, and the results were discussed in detail.

RESULTS

There were twenty-six (16 M/10 F) patients with a mean age at evaluation was 7.52 ∓ 3.68 years. Mean follow-up period was 75.35 ∓ 44.48 months. In FEES study, pharyngeal phase abnormalities were detected in 10 patients (38.4%). Pharyngeal phase abnormalities were detected significantly higher in LG group (p:0.015). Laryngeal penetration/aspiration was seen in four patients on FEES study (15.3%). All of them was in LG group (40%). Laryngeal penetration/aspiration was seen significantly higher in LG group (p:0.014).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to conduct FEES study in children after esophageal atresia repair to evaluate their swallowing conditions. Even though our sample is small, swallowing problems are more common than expected in the cases of LG when compared to SG.

Evolution of bulbar function in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 treated with nusinersen

AIM

To assess the evolution of bulbar function in nusinersen-treated spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1).

METHOD

This single-centre retrospective study identified 24 patients (14 females and 10 males) with SMA1, treated with nusinersen between 2017 and 2020. We adapted and validated the Paediatric Functional Oral Intake Scale (p-FOIS), which is an outcome measure to assess bulbar function. Analysis considered SMA1 subtype, nutritional support, and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND) and p-FOIS scores at initiation of nusinersen treatment (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation.

RESULTS

The median age at baseline was 11 months (range 1 month-7 years 6 months). Median age at initiation of tube feeding was 8 months (range 0-2 years 2 months). Fourteen patients were tube fed at baseline. The median p-FOIS score was 3 at baseline and 2 at 12 and 24 months. Four patients, all with type 1c SMA, remained orally fed at 24 months. Median CHOP INTEND scores increased from 32 at baseline to 42 at 12 and 24 months.

INTERPRETATION

Impaired bulbar function persisted as a significant complication in most nusinersen-treated patients with SMA1, in contrast to the improvement in motor abilities demonstrated in the majority. p-FOIS allows for tracking of bulbar function progression and treatment response. Larger, prospective studies investigating the longer-term impacts of nusinersen on bulbar function are warranted.

[Clinicopathological characterization of children with dysphagia, family impact and health-related quality of life of their caregivers]

INTRODUCTION

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (DOF) without proper evaluation can be underdiagnosed in certain groups of the pediatric population. Meeting the needs of these patients can lead to an overload of their caregivers.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the patients evaluated after starting a monographic DOF clinic (C-DOF) and study whether there are changes at the nutritional level, as well as the burden and impact that caregivers find on quality of life related to health (HRQOL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Descriptive observational study of patients evaluated in a C-DOF from its start-up. To evaluate HRQOL, an ad hoc survey adapted from the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire of the adult population was designed.

RESULTS

103 patients were evaluated, 85.4% presenting some neurological disease. A videofluoroscopic study was performed in 51 patients (49.5%), reporting combined alterations in both the oral and pharyngeal phases in 64.7% of them. There was a directly proportional correlation between the severity of the DOF and the presence of aspirations, as well as with the patient's motor impairment. Regarding the anthropometric evaluation, there was a trend toward improvement in weight z-score (+0.14 SD), height (+0.17 SD) and BMI (+0.16 SD). Out of 46.2% of the caregivers reported that the DOF problem interfered negatively in the basic activities of daily life. The increase in HRQOL, after the evaluation in the monographic DOF clinic, was statistically significant overall.

CONCLUSIONS

The monographic DOF clinic provided specialized care, impacting positively at the nutritional status of patients, as well as perceived changes in HRQOL, with a probable impact on caregivers.