Age and Tumor Location Predict Survival in Nonmetastatic Osteosarcoma in Upper Egypt

Age-dependent molecular variations in osteosarcoma: implications for precision oncology across pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients

Background

Osteosarcoma is a leading subtype of bone tumor affecting adolescents and adults. Comparative molecular characterization among different age groups, especially in pediatric, adolescents and adults, is scarce.

Methods

We collected samples from 194 osteosarcoma patients, encompassing pediatric, adolescent, and adult cohorts. Genomic analyses were conducted to reveal prevalent mutations and compare molecular features in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients.

Results

Samples from 194 osteosarcoma patients across pediatric to adult ages were analyzed, revealing key mutations such as TP53, FLCN, NCOR1, and others. Children and adolescents showed more gene amplifications and HRD mutations, while adults had a greater Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB). Mutations in those over 15 were mainly in cell cycle and PI3K/mTOR pathways, while under 15s had more in cell cycle and angiogenesis with higher VEGFA, CCND3, TFEB mutations. CNV patterns varied with age: VEGFA and XPO5 amplifications more in under 25s, and CDKN2A/B deletions in over 25s. Genetic alterations in genes like MCL1 and MYC were associated with poor prognosis, with VEGFA mutations also indicating worse outcomes. 58% of patients had actionable mutations, suggesting opportunities for targeted therapies. Age-specific patterns were observed, with Multi-TKI mutations more common in younger patients and CDK4/6 inhibitor mutations in adults, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches in osteosarcoma. In a small group of patients with VEGFR amplification, postoperative treatment with multi-kinase inhibitors resulted in a PR in 3 of 13 cases, especially in patients under 15. A significant case involved a 13-year-old with a notable tumor size reduction achieving PR, even with other genetic alterations present in some patients with PD.

Conclusion

This study delineates the molecular differences among pediatric, adolescent, and adult osteosarcoma patients at the genomic level, emphasizing the necessity for precision diagnostics and treatment strategies, and may offer novel prognostic biomarkers for patients with osteosarcoma. These findings provide a significant scientific foundation for the development of individualized treatment approaches tailored to patients of different age groups.

Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Metastatic Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: A Literature Review Based on the Outcomes

Osteosarcoma is a rare condition with a complex treatment. Most protocols include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and consolidation chemotherapy as the standard of treatment. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy lacks scientific evidence proving superiority in opposition to the use of isolated chemotherapy in an adjuvant regimen after surgery. We conducted a review for studies published in English between 1980 and 2020, using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus electronic databases, to evaluate the outcomes when using neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy strategies in the treatment of non-metastatic appendicular osteosarcoma, as well as the toxicity associated with different chemotherapeutic regimens. Patients were divided into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (ACT), depending on the chemotherapy regimen used in association with surgery. A total of 1254 articles in English were screened by title and abstract, and 146 were pre-selected for full reading and analysis. A total of 24 assays matching the inclusion criteria were selected: 10 prospective and 14 retrospective studies. This review points to an absence of significative differences in outcomes, namely overall survival, disease-free survival/event-free survival rates, or toxicity, regarding neoadjuvant or single adjuvant chemotherapy strategies used in the treatment of appendicular non-metastatic osteosarcomas. However, there is a significative difference in population dimensions between the NAC and the ACT groups. Additionally, clinical presentation, tumor localization, tumor volume, or histological type were not considered, with these variables presenting the potential to influence these results. Despite these limitations, our findings should allow a re-thinking of our current practice and promote new opportunities to optimize treatment, always looking towards better survival and lower complications rates.

Outcomes of comprehensive treatment for primary osteosarcoma

Purpose:

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and outcomes of osteosarcoma to identify prognostic factors and determine new strategies to improve overall survival.

Patients and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 12 cases of osteosarcoma treated at our hospital from 2012 to 2017. Tumor site, tissue type, stage, treatments, adverse effects, postoperative limb function, surgical margin, and final outcomes were evaluated.

Results:

All patients received chemotherapy, and 10 underwent wide resection. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were more than good in all cases, and the 3-year survival rate was 73.3%. Two patients are alive with disease, eight have remained disease-free, and two died of the disease. Three of the four recurrent cases involved the pelvis.

Conclusion:

The treatment of primary osteosarcoma with wide resection in our department, therefore, yielded favorable outcomes. However, improved treatment strategies are needed for pelvic and advanced cases.