Demographics, cancer-related factors, and sexual function in rectal cancer patients in Taiwan: preliminary findings

High prevalence of erectile dysfunction within the first year after surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the prevalence of erectile dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery within the first year.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Erectile dysfunction is a late complication of surgery for rectal cancer. Intraoperative mechanical nerve damage is a probable cause, but it can also be attributed to radio- and chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review per our protocol (CRD42023472998), searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in August 2023. We included studies reporting on men having surgery for rectal cancer and providing a prevalence of erectile dysfunction based on validated questionnaires published after 1997. The prevalence was estimated through forest plots. Bias was evaluated according to a checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

RESULTS

Of the 4105 records identified in the search, we included 74 studies reporting on 9006 patients operated for rectal cancer. The studies evaluated erectile dysfunction through six validated questionnaires, especially the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) version 5 or 15 (84 %). The meta-analysis on 22 studies using IIEF showed that the prevalence of moderate to severe erectile dysfunction was 35 % (95 % CI 24-47 %) within the first year after surgery with very low certainty of evidence. Meta-regression on the prevalence of moderate to severe erectile dysfunction did not show a decrease in erectile dysfunction within the first year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Around every third patient experienced moderate to severe erectile dysfunction within the first year after surgery for rectum cancer, and the prevalence of erectile dysfunction did not improve within the first year after surgery.

MINI-ABSTRACT

This is a meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of erectile dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery within the first year. Erectile dysfunction was determined on the base of validated self-administered questionnaires. Moderate to severe erectile dysfunction was seen in one-third of patients within the first year after surgery for rectal cancer.

Frequency of Sexual Problems and Related Psychosocial Characteristics in Cancer Patients-Findings From an Epidemiological Multicenter Study in Germany

Background

Multimodal cancer treatments are often associated with sexual problems. Identifying patients with sexual problems could help further elucidate serious issues with their sexuality and thus promote or maintain patients’ sexual health. We aimed to assess the occurrence of sexual problems in patients across different tumor locations and to explore associated sociodemographic, medical and psychosocial factors.

Methods

We included 3,677 cancer patients (mean age 58 years, age range 18–75 years, 51.4% women) from a large epidemiological multicenter study in Germany on average 13.5 months after cancer diagnosis. The occurrence and frequency of sexual problems were assessed via a binary item on the problem checklist of the Distress Thermometer (DT). Controlled associations of these problems with sociodemographic, medical and psychosocial factors including distress (DT), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30), and social support (SSUK-8) are analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

We found that 31.8% of patients reported sexual problems, with a significant higher proportion in men (40.5%) compared to women (23.7%), OR 2.35, 95% CI [1.80–3.07] and a higher proportion in patients with a partner (35.6%) compared to those without a partner (3.5%), OR 2.83, 95% CI [2.17–3.70]. Tumor location was associated with occurrence of sexual problems: patients with cancer, affecting the male genital organs had the highest chance for sexual problems, OR 2.65, 95% CI [1.18–3.95]. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of sexual problems between age groups OR 0.99, 95% CI [2.13–3.53] and type of therapy (e.g., operation OR 0.91, 95% CI [0.72–1.15]). Sexual problems were further associated with elevated levels of anxiety, OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.02–1.10], less social support, OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.90–0.97] and lower quality of life in terms of impaired functioning (e.g., social function, OR 0.99, 95% CI [0.99–1.00]).

Conclusions

Sexual problems are commonly reported by patients. Male patients and those living with a partner are more likely to report sexual problems. Sexual problems are associated with different aspects of well-being. The findings imply the practical relevance to screen for sexual problems among patients and identified groups that should be particularly monitored.

Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in male survivors of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Background

Prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in male survivors of cancer across cancer types has not been systematically analysed.

Aim

To estimate the prevalence of ED in all types of cancer and identify characteristics associated with ED in survivors of cancer.

Design and setting

Systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) of cross-sectional studies.

Method

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched, targeting reports published from inception to 1 February 2020. All retrospective or prospective studies reporting prevalence of ED in male patients with cancer and using a validated tool for detection of ED were included. A random-effects MA model was used to pool prevalence of ED as absolute estimates at three different stages, that is, ‘healthy’, ‘at diagnosis’, and ‘after treatment’. A univariate MA regression including the three-level group variable as the only independent variable was used to assess the difference in ED prevalence across the three groups. Further MAs were conducted for studies involving patients at diagnosis and after treatment, and statistical inferences were made with setting for multiple testing controlling for a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05.

Results

In total, 1301 studies were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 141 were potentially eligible and subsequently scrutinised in full text. Finally, 43 studies were included with a total of 13 148 participants. Overall, pooled data of the included studies showed an ED prevalence of 40.72% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.80 to 50.29) in patients with cancer, with prevalences of 28.60% (95% CI = 12.10 to 53.83) at time of diagnosis and 42.70% (95% CI = 32.97 to 53.03) after treatment, with significant difference between these two stages and across cancer locations, controlling for an FDR <0.05.

Conclusion

Erectile dysfunction was particularly high in male survivors of cancer and was associated with cancer treatment, cancer site, and age.

Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the Female Sexual Function Index

Cancer may impair sexual function in women. We provide an overview of studies that address Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) in women with cancer with a meta-analysis of observational studies that used a validated diagnostic tool. Searches included MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published from January 2000 to 31 December 2014. Every included study had to involve at least 30 cancer patients, to investigate FSD based on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and to have been published in peer-review journals. Duplicate independent data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Data were pooled using a random effects model if statistical heterogeneity was present. The main outcomes were FSFI total score and FSD prevalence. FSFI is a 19-item self-report instrument for assessing key dimensions of female sexual function. A value less than 26.55 is consistent with FSD. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 27 reported FSFI scores, and 16 FSD prevalence. Most studies (56 %) had low to moderate quality. The mean value of FSFI was lower than 20 at all cancer sites: 16.25 (pooled random effect, 95 % CI 14.91-17.58, I ² = 14.5 %) for colorectal cancer, 18.11 (95 % CI 14.45-21.77, I ² = 97.8 %) for gynecological cancer, and 19.58 (95 % CI 17.64-21.53, I ² = 90.9 %) for breast cancer. FSD prevalence was higher than 60 % at all cancer sites, with the highest value for gynecological cancer (78.44 %, 95 % CI 68.36-88.52 %, I ² = 94.1 %). Women with cancer showed low FSFI scores with a high prevalence of FSD.

Sexual dysfunction in males following low anterior resection

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in males one year after undergoing low anterior resection and to determine whether health care professionals discuss sexual issues with patients after surgery.

BACKGROUND

Sexual dysfunction in males may be a complication after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, but few studies have explored this issue in Taiwan.

DESIGN

A descriptive comparison study design.

METHODS

A descriptive comparison design was used, and a group of 133 participants underwent a low anterior resection procedure for rectal cancer. The results were compared with those of a group of males who underwent colectomy (n = 58) for colon cancer. The following instruments were used: the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function, personal demographics and medical variables.

RESULTS

The results showed that the prevalence of erectile dysfunction among the low anterior resection patients was 97·0% (129/133), and the erectile dysfunction prevalence was 75·9% (44/58) for the males who underwent colectomy. The generalised linear model showed that after controlling for hypertension and stoma, the low anterior resection group had worse sexual function than those in the colectomy group, and stoma was also a factor that impacted patients' sexual function. The results also revealed that only 32·8-35·3% of health care providers talked about sexual dysfunction with people who have rectal cancer prior to surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that men who have undergone low anterior resection have a high risk of sexual dysfunction and that health care professionals infrequently discuss these issues with patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

When patients are diagnosed with rectal cancer and before they undergo surgery, an assessment and discussion of sexual function issues should be incorporated into standard care. Continued follow-up after hospital discharge and evaluations of sexual function are vital factors for male postoperative rectal cancer patients.

Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer

BACKGROUND

Changes to sexual wellbeing are acknowledged to be a long-term negative consequence of cancer and cancer treatment. These changes can have a negative effect on psychological well-being, quality of life and couple relationships. Whilst previous conclusions are based on univariate analysis, multivariate research can facilitate examination of the complex interaction between sexual function and psycho-social variables such as psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and relationship satisfaction and communication in the context of cancer, the aim of the present study.

METHOD

Six hundred and fifty seven people with cancer (535 women, 122 men) and 148 partners (87 women, 61 men), across a range of sexual and non-sexual cancers, completed a survey consisting of standardized measures of sexual functioning, depression and anxiety, quality of life, relationship satisfaction, dyadic sexual communication, and self-silencing, as well as ratings of the importance of sex to life and relationships.

RESULTS

Men and women participants, reported reductions in sexual functioning after cancer across cancer type, for both people with cancer and partners. Multiple regression analysis examined psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning. Physical quality of life was a predictor for men and women with cancer, and for male partners. Dyadic sexual communication was a predictor for women with cancer, and for men and women partners. Mental quality of life and depression were also predictors for women with cancer, and the lower self-sacrifice subscale of self-silencing a predictor for men with cancer.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that information and supportive interventions developed to alleviate sexual difficulties and facilitate sexual renegotiation should be offered to men and women with both sexual and non-sexual cancers, rather than primarily focused on individuals with sexual and reproductive cancers, as is the case currently. It is also important to include partners in supportive interventions. Interventions aimed at improving sexual functioning should include elements aimed at improving physical quality of life and sexual communication, with a focus on psychological wellbeing also being important for women with cancer.