1
|
Hernández-Hernández S, Heredia-Ciuró A, Martín-Núñez J, Calvache-Mateo A, Navas-Otero A, López-López L, Valenza MC. The Impact of Pain Education Interventions for Cancer Survivors and Caregivers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2468. [PMID: 39001530 PMCID: PMC11240398 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer-related pain is a global health-related problem associated with functional impairment, anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. The use of educational interventions for patients and their caregivers has been proposed as a promising tool for overcoming pain in cancer. The aim of this study was to summarize by means of a standardized methodological systematic revision the actual pain education intervention used in cancer patients and their caregivers and to analyze its effects on pain. METHODS A search was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cinhal from their inception to September 2022. Randomized controlled trials which included pain education interventions were identified. Two reviewers performed independent data extraction and methodologic quality assessments of these studies. RESULTS A total of seven studies was included in the study. The meta-analysis showed that pain education interventions have a significant effect on the worst pain; however, there was no effect on average pain. CONCLUSIONS Pain education interventions addressed to patients and their caregivers could have positive effects on cancer-related pain. It is recommended that a minimum of three sessions of about one hour's duration be held once a week. Further research needs to be carried out and analyzed on the effects over the long term. Pain education interventions show positive results in improving pain in cancer patients regardless of etiology or extent of the cancer. Studies with better methodological quality should be carried out to address specific components related to education interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofía Hernández-Hernández
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Alejandro Heredia-Ciuró
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Javier Martín-Núñez
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Andrés Calvache-Mateo
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Alba Navas-Otero
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Laura López-López
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Marie Carmen Valenza
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De La Ilustración 60, 18016 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morikawa M, Kajiwara K, Kobayashi M, Yusuke K, Nakano K, Matsuda Y, Shimizu Y, Shimazu T, Kako J. Nursing Support for Pain in Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e49692. [PMID: 38161938 PMCID: PMC10757112 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Pain is subjective, warranting tailored responses in pharmacotherapy and nursing support. Despite this, the evidence for suitable nursing support for pain is not well established in terminally ill patients such as those with cancer; therefore, it is necessary to provide support in consideration of changes in physical symptoms and quality of life. However, interventional studies for such patients are often difficult. There have been no comprehensive studies to date on non-pharmacological support that can be implemented by nurses. Therefore, with the aim of examining nursing support applicable at the end of life, this scoping review comprehensively mapped nursing support for pain in cancer patients at all stages of the disease. This study complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. All available published articles from the time of database establishment to January 31, 2022, were systematically searched for in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), CENTRAL, and the Ichushi Web database of the Japanese Society of Medical Abstracts. Overall, 10,385 articles were screened, and 72 were finally included. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 62) and non-RCTs (n = 10) were included. Twenty-two types of nursing support were identified. Eighteen of them showed positive results; five of them were provided only to terminally ill patients, three of which were effective, namely, comfort care, foot bath, and combined therapy. It is important to examine the applicability of types of nursing support in clinical practice in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kohei Kajiwara
- Faculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN
| | - Masamitsu Kobayashi
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Kanno Yusuke
- Department of Home Health and Palliative Care Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Kimiko Nakano
- Clinical Research Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, JPN
| | - Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, JPN
| | - Yoichi Shimizu
- Department of Adult Nursing, National College of Nursing, Japan, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Taichi Shimazu
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Jun Kako
- Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang J, Chan DNS, Liu X, Cai Y, Chen J, Xie M. Effects of self-management interventions for cancer patients with pain: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:5652-5667. [PMID: 36929168 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the effects of self-management interventions targeting individuals with cancer-related pain on pain intensity, self-efficacy, quality of life (QoL), pain medication adherence, and pain-related knowledge and provide recommendations for the content and format of self-management interventions based on the existing evidence. DESIGN A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES A search of six electronic databases, including Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published from January 2011 to March 2022 in English were retrieved. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess quality. Data were summarised using narrative synthesis. RESULTS This systematic review included six RCTs involving 748 patients with cancer-related pain. The results support the effectiveness of the intervention on QoL and pain-related knowledge. Mixed results were observed in the effectiveness on pain intensity, self-efficacy and medication adherence. Overall, the quality of the evidence was low. The content of self-management interventions varied across studies but with similar formats (face-to-face coaching and telephone follow-up). CONCLUSION The existing evidence supports the effectiveness of self-management interventions on pain-related knowledge and QoL. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to determine the most effective interventions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Self-management is recommended to improve cancer patients' pain awareness, self-management behaviour and adaptability. Components for self-management of cancer pain, including patient attitude and knowledge assessment, nurse coaching and counselling, reinforcement during follow-up period, and provision of supplementary materials on pain management and medication adherence, could be covered in the intervention. In the future, it is worthwhile exploring an effective intervention using Internet-based information technology, for example WeChat, to aid the delivery of self-management intervention. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This systematic review does not necessarily involve patients or public members in this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junfeng Zhang
- Department of Nursing, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Dorothy N S Chan
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingling Liu
- Department of Nursing, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yingying Cai
- Department of Nursing, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiawen Chen
- Department of Nursing, SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Minjuan Xie
- School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geerling JI, van der Linden YM, Raijmakers NJH, Vermeulen KM, Mul VEM, de Nijs EJM, Westhoff PG, de Bock GH, de Graeff A, Reyners AKL. Randomized controlled study of pain education in patients receiving radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2023; 185:109687. [PMID: 37169300 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although short-course radiotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with painful bone metastases, pain is not always sufficiently controlled. We therefore investigated the additional effect of a nurse-led pain education program on pain control and quality of life (QoL). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter study, patients with solid tumor bone metastases and a worst pain intensity of ≥5 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) were randomized between care as usual (control-group) and care as usual plus the Pain Education Program (PEP-group). PEP consisted of a structured interview and personalized education with follow-up phone calls. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and BM22 at week 0, 1, 4, 8 and 12. The primary outcome was pain control, defined as the number of patients whose worst pain intensity was <5 on a 0-10 NRS after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to reach control of pain (NRS < 5), mean worst pain and average pain, and QoL at weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS Of 308 included patients, 182 (92 PEP-group) completed 12 weeks follow-up. At 12 weeks, more patients in the PEP-group (71%) compared to the control-group (52%) reported pain control (P =.008). In the PEP-group, pain control was reached earlier than in the control-group (median 29 days versus 56 days; P =.003). Mean worst and average pain decreased in both groups but decreased more in the PEP-group. QoL did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION The addition of PEP to care as usual for patients treated with radiotherapy for painful bone metastases resulted in less pain and faster pain control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenske I Geerling
- Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yvette M van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, University of Leiden, the Netherlands; Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, the Netherlands
| | | | - Karin M Vermeulen
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Veronique E M Mul
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen J M de Nijs
- Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Paulien G Westhoff
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang R, Zheng X, Su X, Huang X, Liu H, Guo Y, Gao J. The development of a Cancer Pain Belief Modification Program for patients with oral cancer in China: a feasibility study. BMC Nurs 2023; 22:206. [PMID: 37322484 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01372-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acceptance-based pain management interventions have been receiving growing attention in cancer pain care. This study aimed to develop a cancer pain management program based on belief modification to improve the cancer pain experience of Chinese oral cancer survivors and to explore the acceptability and preliminary outcomes of the Cancer Pain Belief Modification Program (CPBMP). METHODS A mixed-methods approach was applied to develop and revise the program. The CPBMP was developed and revised using the Delphi technique, and its further improvement was explored with a one-group pre- and post-trial designed with a sample of 16 Chinese oral cancer survivors, and semi-structured interviews. Research instruments included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Chinese version of Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for Cancer Pain (IPQ-CaCP), and the University of Washington Quality of Life assessment scale (UW-QOL). Descriptive statistics, t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyse the data. The semi-structured questions were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS The six-module CPBMP was endorsed by most experts and patients. The expert authority coefficient value was 0.75 in the first round of the Delphi survey and 0.78 in the second round. The "pain intense", "negative pain beliefs" scores of pre- and post-testing decreased from 5.63 ± 0.48 to 0.81 ± 0.54 (t = -3.746, p < 0.001); from 140.63 ± 9.02 to 52.75 ± 7.27 (Z = 12.406, p < 0.001); and the "positive pain beliefs", "quality of life" scores increased from 55.13 ± 4.54 to 66.00 ± 4.70 (Z = -6.983, p < 0.001); from 66.97 ± 15.01 to 86.69 ± 8.42 (Z = 7.283, p < 0.001). The qualitative data also indicated that CPBMP was well acceptable. CONCLUSION Our study showed the acceptability and preliminary outcomes of CPBMP patients. CPBMP improves the pain experience of Chinese oral cancer patients and provides a reference for cancer pain management in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION The feasibility study has already been registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ) in 11/09/2021. (ChiCTR2100051065).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongna Wang
- The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, No.1 Xueyuan Road, Shangjie, Minhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Otolaryngology head and neck surgery, Xi Jing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Changle West Road 127, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
| | - Xiaoyan Zheng
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xixi Su
- The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, No.1 Xueyuan Road, Shangjie, Minhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiuyu Huang
- The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, No.1 Xueyuan Road, Shangjie, Minhou, Fujian, China
| | - Huangju Liu
- The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, No.1 Xueyuan Road, Shangjie, Minhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yulai Guo
- The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, No.1 Xueyuan Road, Shangjie, Minhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ji Gao
- The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, No.1 Xueyuan Road, Shangjie, Minhou, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rakhshani T, Najafi S, Javady F, Taghian Dasht Bozorg A, Mohammadkhah F, Khani Jeihooni A. The effect of Orem-based self-care education on improving self-care ability of patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:770. [PMID: 35840918 PMCID: PMC9284903 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09881-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is a frightening disease. Therefore, the care of cancer patients is very complex. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the education based on Orem’s self-care model on self-care abilities of the patients undergoing chemotherapy in Shafa Hospital in Ahvaz city, Iran. Methods This randomized clinical trial was carried out in 2018 on 100 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, who referred to Shafa Hospital in Ahvaz city, Iran. The sampling method was simple and the subjects were randomly divided into two experimental and control groups (50 in the experimental and 50 in the control group). The study outcome was the self-care ability of the patients measured before and 2 months after the intervention by the control and experimental groups. The educational intervention consisted of five 60-minute sessions (one session per week) held as educational and counseling ones through group, face-to-face and individual training based on the identified needs of the patients in the experimental group at Shafa Hospital Chemotherapy Department. To collect data, two questionnaires [the assess and identify the conceptual pattern of Orem questionnaire and the Self-care capacity assessment (ESCI)]were used. Statistical data were entered into SPSS software version 20 and analyzed by chi-square, independent t-test and paired t-test. Results The mean and standard deviation of age was 35.06 ± 14.51 in the control group and 31.72 ± 15.01 in the experimental group. The results of the independent t-test showed that before the educational intervention, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean self-care (P = 0.38). But after the intervention, a significant difference was found between the mean self-care scores of the experimental and control groups (P = 0.001). Conclusion Application of Orem’s self-care model led to increased self-care ability of the cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, it is recommended that this model be included in the routine programs of chemotherapy departments. Trial registration IRCT registration number: IRCT20160418027449N6. Registration date: 01/05/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayebeh Rakhshani
- Nutrition Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Siamak Najafi
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
| | - Fakhry Javady
- Nutrition Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | - Fatemeh Mohammadkhah
- Department of Community health, child nursing and aging, Ramsar School of Nursing, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Ali Khani Jeihooni
- Nutrition Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoshida S, Sato F, Tagami K, Sasaki R, Takahashi C, Sasaki K, Takahashi S. Development of the opioid self-management scale for advanced Cancer patients with pain and examination of its validity and reliability. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21:102. [PMID: 35658954 PMCID: PMC9169256 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00987-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 60% of outpatients with advanced cancer experience pain; therefore, self-management of opioid use is important for appropriate pain relief. To date, no studies have clearly described the concept of opioid self-management or assessed the factors involved, including the improvement of self-management abilities. This study developed, and evaluated the validity and reliability of an opioid self-management scale for advanced cancer patients with pain (OSSA). Opioid self-management in advanced cancer patients with pain was defined as the management of opioid medication performed by patients with advanced cancer to relieve cancer pain on their own. Methods Three phases were required for validation and reliability of the OSSA: 1) testing content validity, 2) testing face validity, and 3) testing construct validity, concurrent validity and reliability. Results After a three-phase process, the OSSA consisted of 33 items on six subscales. The structural equation modeling was such that the χ2 value was 709.8 (p < 0.001, df = 467), goodness-of-fit index was 0.78, adjusted goodness-of-fit index was 0.73, root mean squares of approximation was 0.063, and comparative fit index was 0.92. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the total OSSA score and the 24-hour average pain or pain relief over 24 hours were − 0.21 (p < 0.05) and 0.26 (p < 0.01), respectively. Cronbach’s α was 0.93. The intraclass correlation coefficient range was 0.59–0.90. Conclusion The findings of this study show that the OSSA has acceptable validity and reliability, and that better self-management leads to greater pain relief. The OSSA can be considered effective for use in research, but shortened version should be prepared for realistic and practical clinical use. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00987-4.
Collapse
|
8
|
Park YJ, Lee MK. Effects of nurse-led nonpharmacological pain interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nurs Scholarsh 2021; 54:422-433. [PMID: 34847285 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to review the types of nurse-led nonpharmacological pain interventions (NPI) offered to cancer patients and/or family caregivers, and to determine a comprehensive and robust estimate of the effect size of nurse-led NPI for cancer patients on various pain-related outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies assessing nurse-led NPIs targeting cancer patients and published between January 2008 and December 2020 were identified by searching multiple literature databases, including MEDLINE® , EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ProQuest Medical Library, and CINAHL® . METHODS This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The selected randomized clinical trials were independently assessed for methodological quality. The effect sizes (ESs) of treatment were presented as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). FINDINGS A meta-analysis was performed to analyze data from 22 randomized clinical trials. Three types of nurse-led NPI were offered, mainly to cancer patients but also to some caregivers: music, physical, and psycho-educational interventions. The dose and duration of nonpharmacological interventions varied widely. The study participants ranged in age from 44.1 to 67.3 years. Meta-analysis indicated that, although these interventions had small effects in long-term (g = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.06-0.43, p = 0.011) to medium effects in short-term (g = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.001), they significantly reduced patients' pain, increased their knowledge of pain management, reduced barriers to pain management and pain coping, and improved other physical and emotional symptoms. The significance of the ES differed according to the type of intervention, with psycho-educational and physical NPIs having a significant but medium short-term ES, whereas music NPI had a significant but large short-term ES. Only psycho-educational NPIs had significant long-term effects. CONCLUSION The combined ES showed that these nurse-led NPIs were significantly effective in both the short and long-term. Types of intervention as a potential moderator were associated with short-term and long-term effects of nonpharmacological interventions on patient outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Research-tested interventions should be provided to help patients cope effectively with pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youn Jin Park
- College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Myung Kyung Lee
- College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Valenta S, Miaskowski C, Spirig R, Zaugg K, Rettke H, Spichiger E. Exploring learning processes associated with a cancer pain self-management intervention in patients and family caregivers: A mixed methods study. Appl Nurs Res 2021; 62:151480. [PMID: 34815011 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Explore learning processes associated with a psychoeducational pain selfmanagement intervention. BACKGROUND Self-management of cancer pain is challenging for patients and their family caregivers (FCs). While psychoeducational interventions can support them to handle these tasks, it remains unclear how learning processes are hampered or facilitated. METHODS A convergent parallel mixed methods design with qualitative data collection embedded in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was used. Outpatients with cancer and FCs were recruited from three Swiss university hospitals. The six-week intervention consisted of education, skills building, and nurse coaching. Quantitative data on pain management knowledge and self-efficacy were analyzed using multilevel models. Patients and FCs were interviewed post-RCT regarding their learning experiences. Qualitative data analysis was guided by interpretive description. Finally, quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using case level comparisons and a meta-matrix. RESULTS Twenty-one patients and seven FCs completed this study. The group-by-time effect showed increases in knowledge (p = 0.035) and self-efficacy (p = 0.007). Patients' and FCs' learning through experience was supported by an intervention nurse, who was perceived as competent and trustworthy. After the study, most intervention group participants felt more confident to implement pain self-management. Finally, data integration showed that declining health hampered some patients' pain self-management. CONCLUSIONS Competent and trustworthy nurses can support patients' and FCs' pain self-management by providing individualized interventions. Using a diary, jointly reflecting on the documented experiences, and addressing knowledge deficits and misconceptions through the use of academic detailing can facilitate patients' and FCs' learning of critical skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Valenta
- Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christine Miaskowski
- School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, 2 Koret Way - N631Y, San Francisco, CA 94143-0610, United States
| | - Rebecca Spirig
- Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Kathrin Zaugg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Horst Rettke
- Department of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth Spichiger
- Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Nursing, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 15, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Durosier Mertilus DS, Lengacher CA, Rodriguez CS. A Review and Conceptual Analysis of Cancer Pain Self-Management. Pain Manag Nurs 2021; 23:168-173. [PMID: 34006496 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this concept analysis article, we will clarify the concept "self-management of cancer pain" by identifying related antecedents, attributes, and consequences to further refine the conceptual and operational definitions of the concept. DESIGN A review was conducted. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS The Walker and Avant method was used for this concept analysis. DATA SOURCES CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycInfo were searched systemically.A total of eight studies on "self-management of cancer pain or self-care of cancer pain" published between 2004 and 2019 were identified. RESULTS Attributes for self-management of cancer pain include self-efficacy, integration of methods for pain relief into daily life, decision-making related to pain management, process for solving pain-related issues, and initiation of interactions with healthcare professionals. Antecedents include knowledge regarding pain assessment and management, cognitive abilities, motivation, undergoing pain treatment, patient education and counseling, social support, and accountability from all parties involved. Consequences include pain control, improved quality of life, and increased opioid intake. CONCLUSIONS Self-management of cancer pain was reported to be a self-regulation process with the aim to encourage patients to use skills attained through development of self-efficacy, so they can actively participate in their pain management. This outcome may enhance their quality of life by decreasing their pain, depression, and anxiety and increasing the availability of social support.
Collapse
|
11
|
Haase KR, Sattar S, Hall S, McLean B, Wills A, Gray M, Kenis C, Donison V, Howell D, Puts M. Systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer. Psychooncology 2021; 30:989-1008. [PMID: 33724608 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer and to determine the effective components of said interventions. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults (65+) with cancer guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. We conducted an exhaustive search of the following databases: Ageline, AMED, ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. We assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Down & Black for quasi-experimental studies, with data synthesized in a narrative and tabular format. RESULTS Sixteen thousand nine hundred and eight-five titles and abstracts were screened, subsequently 452 full-text papers were reviewed by two independent reviewers, of which 13 full-text papers were included in the final review. All self-management interventions included in this review measured Quality of Life; other outcomes included mood, self-care activity, supportive care needs, self-advocacy, pain intensity, and analgesic intake; only one intervention measured frailty. Effective interventions were delivered by a multidisciplinary teams (n = 4), nurses (n = 3), and mental health professionals (n = 1). Self-management core skills most commonly targeted included: problem solving; behavioural self-monitoring and tailoring; and settings goals and action planning. CONCLUSIONS Global calls to action argue for increased emphasize on self-management but presently, few interventions exist that explicitly target the self-management needs of older adults with cancer. Future work should focus on explicit pathways to support older adults and their caregivers to prepare for and engage in cancer self-management processes and behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen R Haase
- Faculty of Applied Science, School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Schroder Sattar
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Steven Hall
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Bianca McLean
- De Groote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aria Wills
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mikaela Gray
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cindy Kenis
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valentina Donison
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kiza AH, Cong X. Adults' Self-Management of Chronic Cancer and Noncancer Pain in People with and Without Cognitive Impairment: A Concept Analysis. Pain Manag Nurs 2020; 22:69-73. [PMID: 33132039 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To report a concept analysis of adult self-management of chronic pain. BACKGROUND Self-management of chronic pain has received increasing attention in the clinical research literature. Although with only limited conceptual work. Despite the pervasiveness of pain in adults, there has been a lack of conceptual work to elucidate meaning of adult's self-management of chronic pain. DESIGN Concept Analysis. METHOD Rodgers (2000) evolutionary approach of concept analysis was used to systematically analyze 44 articles from different databases. Only 12 articles used the concept of chronic pain self-management. Data were extracted using standardized forms and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS This concept analysis identified six attributes of adult self-management of chronic pain: (1) multimodal interventions; (2) patient-provider relationship; (3) goal setting; (4) decision making; (5) resource utilization; and (6) chronic pain problem solving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaomei Cong
- From the School of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chee W, Lee Y, Ji X, Chee E, Im EO. The Preliminary Efficacy of a Technology-Based Cancer Pain Management Program Among Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors. Comput Inform Nurs 2020; 38:139-147. [PMID: 31688089 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
With few existing technology-based programs to support cancer pain management, the need for culturally tailored programs to support ethnic minority cancer survivors has been highlighted. The purpose of this study was to explore the preliminary efficacy of the technology-based CAncer Pain management support Program for Asian American survivors of breast cancer, a technology-based cancer pain management program, in improving the cancer pain experience of Asian American breast cancer survivors. This pilot study adopted a randomized repeated-measures pretest/posttest control group design with a sample of 94 Asian American breast cancer survivors. Study measures included the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, Support Care Needs Survey-34 Short Form, and Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Community. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics including repeated-measures analysis of covariance. Although there were no significant differences in pain, there were significant changes in perceived isolation (F = 9.937, P < .01), personal resources (F = 6.612, P < .05), support care need (F = 8.299, P < .01), and degree of uncertainty (F = 8.722, P < .01) in the intervention group from pretest to posttest. These findings support the positive effects of CAncer Pain management support Program for Asian American survivors of breast cancer on the cancer pain experience of Asian American breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonshik Chee
- Author Affiliations: Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Drs W. Chee and Im and Ms E. Chee); Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Dr Lee); University of Delaware, Newark (Dr Ji)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zou B, Li X, Huang X, Xiong D, Liu Y. Telephone Follow-up Design and Practice for Advanced Cancer Pain Patients. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:751-759. [PMID: 30989478 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01523-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
To describe the design of a telephone follow-up protocol and to evaluate the feasibility of this protocol for advanced cancer pain patients. A series of nine telephone follow-up calls was implemented with 40 advanced cancer pain patients within 3 months after their discharge from the Department of Chemotherapy. Cancer pain information and the pain-related knowledge of the patients were collected by nurses using pain follow-up information sheets and the Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ); pain self-efficacy and the quality of life were reported by patients using the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSS) Chinese version and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Chinese version. The average score assessed by advanced cancer pain patients of the need for pain care from nurses was 24.28 (SD = 4.90). Twenty-one and eight patients completed all nine telephone follow-up calls and seven self-reported questionnaires, respectively. The pain intensity of patients at the time of follow-up was mild, but there had been breakthrough pain in the previous week. All patients were satisfied with the nurses' pain follow-up practices. There was a highly positive correlation between the time of follow-up and the patients' pain-related knowledge scores (r = 0.963**, p < 0.01). Patients' pain self-efficacy scores and quality of life scores varied across different dimensions. The baseline pain self-efficacy subscales were associated with all dimensions of quality of life (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Telephone follow-up can be an effective method of transitional care. For advanced cancer pain patients, it is still necessary to further explore the cost effectiveness of this method, including the appropriate follow-up duration, endpoints, and outcome measures based on government requirements and policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benyan Zou
- The Department of Chemotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Phase I ward, 21th floor, Building 1, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuling Li
- The Department of Chemotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Phase I ward, 21th floor, Building 1, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuxia Huang
- The Department of Chemotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Phase I ward, 21th floor, Building 1, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Dandan Xiong
- The Department of Chemotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Phase I ward, 21th floor, Building 1, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Liu
- The Department of Chemotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Phase I ward, 21th floor, Building 1, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Le Bon P, Solem-Laviec H, Devoueize I, Despres N, Grellard JM, Danet S, Clarisse B, Lequesne J, Beauplet B. Geriatric phone follow-up in the management of older patients treated for cancer: Telog study results. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:951-959. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
16
|
Ream E, Hughes AE, Cox A, Skarparis K, Richardson A, Pedersen VH, Wiseman T, Forbes A, Bryant A. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 6:CD007568. [PMID: 32483832 PMCID: PMC7264015 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007568.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with cancer experience a variety of symptoms as a result of their disease and the therapies involved in its management. Inadequate symptom management has implications for patient outcomes including functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QoL). Attempts to reduce the incidence and severity of cancer symptoms have involved the development and testing of psycho-educational interventions to enhance patients' symptom self-management. With the trend for care to be provided nearer patients' homes, telephone-delivered psycho-educational interventions have evolved to provide support for the management of a range of cancer symptoms. Early indications suggest that these can reduce symptom severity and distress through enhanced symptom self-management. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of telephone-delivered interventions for reducing symptoms associated with cancer and its treatment. To determine which symptoms are most responsive to telephone interventions. To determine whether certain configurations (e.g. with/without additional support such as face-to-face, printed or electronic resources) and duration/frequency of intervention calls mediate observed cancer symptom outcome effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 1); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to January 2019); Embase via OVID (1980 to January 2019); (CINAHL) via Athens (1982 to January 2019); British Nursing Index (1984 to January 2019); and PsycINFO (1989 to January 2019). We searched conference proceedings to identify published abstracts, as well as SIGLE and trial registers for unpublished studies. We searched the reference lists of all included articles for additional relevant studies. Finally, we handsearched the following journals: Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psycho-oncology, Cancer Practice, Cancer Nursing, Oncology Nursing Forum, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, and Palliative Medicine. We restricted our search to publications published in English. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared one or more telephone interventions with one other, or with other types of interventions (e.g. a face-to-face intervention) and/or usual care, with the stated aim of addressing any physical or psychological symptoms of cancer and its treatment, which recruited adults (over 18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of cancer, regardless of tumour type, stage of cancer, type of treatment, and time of recruitment (e.g. before, during, or after treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction and analysis. When possible, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, emotional distress, pain, uncertainty, sexually-related and lung cancer symptoms as well as secondary outcomes are reported as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we presented a descriptive synthesis of study findings. We reported on findings according to symptoms addressed and intervention types (e.g. telephone only, telephone combined with other elements). As many studies included small samples, and because baseline scores for study outcomes often varied for intervention and control groups, we used change scores and associated standard deviations. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was interpreted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-two studies were eligible for inclusion; most had moderate risk of bias,often related to blinding. Collectively, researchers recruited 6250 people and studied interventions in people with a variety of cancer types and across the disease trajectory, although many participants had breast cancer or early-stage cancer and/or were starting treatment. Studies measured symptoms of anxiety, depression, emotional distress, uncertainty, fatigue, and pain, as well as sexually-related symptoms and general symptom intensity and/or distress. Interventions were primarily delivered by nurses (n = 24), most of whom (n = 16) had a background in oncology, research, or psychiatry. Ten interventions were delivered solely by telephone; the rest combined telephone with additional elements (i.e. face-to-face consultations and digital/online/printed resources). The number of calls delivered ranged from 1 to 18; most interventions provided three or four calls. Twenty-one studies provided evidence on effectiveness of telephone-delivered interventions and the majority appeared to reduce symptoms of depression compared to control. Nine studies contributed quantitative change scores (CSs) and associated standard deviation results (or these could be calculated). Likewise, many telephone interventions appeared effective when compared to control in reducing anxiety (16 studies; 5 contributed quantitative CS results); fatigue (9 studies; 6 contributed to quantitative CS results); and emotional distress (7 studies; 5 contributed quantitative CS results). Due to significant clinical heterogeneity with regards to interventions introduced, study participants recruited, and outcomes measured, meta-analysis was not conducted. For other symptoms (uncertainty, pain, sexually-related symptoms, dyspnoea, and general symptom experience), evidence was limited; similarly meta-analysis was not possible, and results from individual studies were largely conflicting, making conclusions about their management through telephone-delivered interventions difficult to draw. Heterogeneity was considerable across all trials for all outcomes. Overall, the certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes in the review. Outcomes were all downgraded due to concerns about overall risk of bias profiles being frequently unclear, uncertainty in effect estimates and due to some inconsistencies in results and general heterogeneity. Unsubstantiated evidence suggests that telephone interventions in some capacity may have a place in symptom management for adults with cancer. However, in the absence of reliable and homogeneous evidence, caution is needed in interpreting the narrative synthesis. Further, there were no clear patterns across studies regarding which forms of interventions (telephone alone versus augmented with other elements) are most effective. It is impossible to conclude with any certainty which forms of telephone intervention are most effective in managing the range of cancer-related symptoms that people with cancer experience. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Telephone interventions provide a convenient way of supporting self-management of cancer-related symptoms for adults with cancer. These interventions are becoming more important with the shift of care closer to patients' homes, the need for resource/cost containment, and the potential for voluntary sector providers to deliver healthcare interventions. Some evidence supports the use of telephone-delivered interventions for symptom management for adults with cancer; most evidence relates to four commonly experienced symptoms - depression, anxiety, emotional distress, and fatigue. Some telephone-delivered interventions were augmented by combining them with face-to-face meetings and provision of printed or digital materials. Review authors were unable to determine whether telephone alone or in combination with other elements provides optimal reduction in symptoms; it appears most likely that this will vary by symptom. It is noteworthy that, despite the potential for telephone interventions to deliver cost savings, none of the studies reviewed included any form of health economic evaluation. Further robust and adequately reported trials are needed across all cancer-related symptoms, as the certainty of evidence generated in studies within this review was very low, and reporting was of variable quality. Researchers must strive to reduce variability between studies in the future. Studies in this review are characterised by clinical and methodological diversity; the level of this diversity hindered comparison across studies. At the very least, efforts should be made to standardise outcome measures. Finally, studies were compromised by inclusion of small samples, inadequate concealment of group allocation, lack of observer blinding, and short length of follow-up. Consequently, conclusions related to symptoms most amenable to management by telephone-delivered interventions are tentative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ream
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Anna Cox
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Katy Skarparis
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vibe H Pedersen
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- Health Services Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angus Forbes
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Walker LO. Gifts of wise women: A reflection on enduring ideas in nursing that transcend time. Nurs Outlook 2020; 68:355-364. [PMID: 32138977 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Revised: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
In this essay, I propose there are enduring ideas in the works of nurse theorists from the 1960s and 1970s that were valuable not only in the past, but in nursing today as well as in possibly shaping the future of nursing knowledge development. I identify these as gift ideas and draw on the work of Wiedenbach for the gift of dignity in nursing philosophy, and the gifts of dialogue from Orlando, behavioral systems from Johnson, context from Roy, self-care from Orem, and finally the gift of nursing science as emergent in understanding life processes from Rogers. Although the core of nursing knowledge may be elusive, the gift ideas mentioned in this essay provide some guideposts in articulating and developing that core in the present as well as in the future.
Collapse
|
18
|
You E. Nontraditional and Home-Based Self-management Interventions in Cancer Patients With Pain: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review. Holist Nurs Pract 2020; 34:138-149. [PMID: 32282489 DOI: 10.1097/hnp.0000000000000380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
One or 2 decades ago, oncologists focused on only cancer treatments or acute care related to cancer. Since cancer care is considered as long-term cares, cancer patients require self-management (SM) ability or skill to manage their symptoms and daily cares. This mixed-method review is to evaluate quantitative and qualitative studies, which were conducted using non-traditional SM interventions for cancer pain based. This review also explores the process of SM in the chronic care model (CCM). PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Wiley were used from 2011 to 2018. A total of 16 quantitative and 2 qualitative studies were included for this review. All interventions are divided into 3 types, which are educational and/or counseling programs, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy, and exercise. Ten of the included 16 studies were statistically significant on pain management: 3 CAM studies (100%), 1 exercise study (100%), and 6 of the 12 educational and/or counseling studies (50%). The CAM and exercise were statistically effective in improving cancer pain in the review. However, uncertainty remains regarding the strength of the evidence, due to the small number of studies included and lack of consistent methodologies. The application (5A) of SM support may help cancer patients to manage their pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunhea You
- Department of Nursing, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
A clinical approach to the management of cancer-related pain in emergency situations. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3147-3157. [PMID: 31076900 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04830-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most cancer patients experience many pain episodes depending on disruptive elements, leading them to the emergency room. The objective of the article is to describe common pitfalls that need to be avoided, as well as opportunities to be seized for repositioning patients back on their care pathway. METHODS Critical reflection based on literature analysis and clinical practice. RESULTS Most forms of cancer are now chronic, evolving diseases, and patients are treated with high-technology targeted therapies with iatrogenic effects. Moreover, the multimorphic nature of cancer-related pain requires dynamic, interdisciplinary assessments addressing its etiology, its pathophysiology, its dimensions (sensory-discriminatory, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral), and the patient's perception of it, in order to propose the most adapted therapies. However, for most patients, cancer pain remains underestimated, poorly assessed, and under-treated. In this context, the key steps in emergency cancer pain management are as follows: • Quick relief of uncontrolled cancer pain: after eliminating potential medical or surgical emergencies revealed by pain, a brief questioning will make the use of carefully titrated morphine in most situations possible. • Assessment and re-assessment of the pain and the patient, screening specific elements, to better understand the situation and its consequences. • Identification of disruptive elements leading to uncontrolled pain, with an interdisciplinary confrontation to find a mid to long-term approach, involving the appropriate pharmaceutical and/or non-pharmaceutical strategies, possibly including interventions. CONCLUSIONS Pain emergencies should be part of the cancer care pathway and, through supportive care, provide an opportunity to help cancer patients both maintain their physical, psychological, and social balance and anticipate further painful episodes.
Collapse
|
20
|
Maindet C, Burnod A, Minello C, George B, Allano G, Lemaire A. Strategies of complementary and integrative therapies in cancer-related pain-attaining exhaustive cancer pain management. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3119-3132. [PMID: 31076901 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04829-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complementary integrative therapies (CITs) correspond to growing demand in patients with cancer-related pain. This demand needs to be considered alongside pharmaceutical and/or interventional therapies. CITs can be used to cover certain specific pain-related characteristics. The objective of this review is to present the options for CITs that could be used within dynamic, multidisciplinary, and personalized management, leading to an integrative oncology approach. METHODS Critical reflection based on literature analysis and clinical practice. RESULTS Most CITs only showed trends in efficacy as cancer pain was mainly a secondary endpoint, or populations were restricted. Physical therapy has demonstrated efficacy in motion and pain, in some specific cancers (head and neck or breast cancers) or in treatments sequelae (lymphedema). In cancer survivors, higher levels of physical activity decrease pain intensity. Due to the multimorphism of cancer pain, certain mind-body therapies acting on anxiety, stress, depression, or mood disturbances (such as massage, acupuncture, healing touch, hypnosis, and music therapy) are efficient on cancer pain. Other mind-body therapies have shown trends in reducing the severity of cancer pain and improving other parameters, and they include education (with coping skills training), yoga, tai chi/qigong, guided imagery, virtual reality, and cognitive-behavioral therapy alone or combined. The outcome sustainability of most CITs is still questioned. CONCLUSIONS High-quality clinical trials should be conducted with CITs, as their efficacy on pain is mainly based on efficacy trends in pain severity, professional judgment, and patient preferences. Finally, the implementation of CITs requires an interdisciplinary team approach to offer optimal, personalized, cancer pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Maindet
- Pain management centre, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Alexis Burnod
- Department of supportive care, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Christian Minello
- Anaesthesia-intensive care department, Cancer Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Gilles Allano
- Pain management unit, Mutualist Clinic of la Porte-de-l'Orient, Lorient, France
| | - Antoine Lemaire
- Oncology and medical specialties department, Valenciennes General Hospital, Valenciennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hekmatpou D, Nasiri A, Mohaghegh F. Investigating the Effect of Self-Care Training on Life Expectancy and Quality of Life in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer under Radiotherapy. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2019; 6:198-205. [PMID: 30931366 PMCID: PMC6371673 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_47_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: A huge amount of the efforts made by health teams is dedicated to caring for cancer patients. This study has aimed to investigate the effect of self-care training on life expectancy and quality of life (QOL) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were under radiotherapy. Methods: In this clinical trial, 50 patients were selected using the block randomization method. The intervention was performed at Ayatollah Khansari Hospital in Arak, Iran. The patients in the intervention group received three sessions of face-to-face training. The data collection tools included Schneider's Life Expectancy Questionnaire and EORTC QOLQ-C30. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 23. Results: In the control group, 16 were male (64%) and 9 female (36%), and in the intervention group, 14 were male (56%) and 11 were female (44%). Before the intervention, the two groups were homogenous regarding all variables. After the intervention, the mean of QOL was 67 ± 22.62 in the intervention group and 56 ± 18.55 in the control group (P < 0.05). In examining the different dimensions of QOL, improvement in all functional dimensions was observed in the intervention group. After the intervention, the mean score of life expectancy showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the intervention group (39.52 ± 5.26) and the control group (31.6 ± 7.13). Conclusions: It was found that self-care training improved the QOL and life expectancy of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were under radiotherapy. Therefore, self-care training is recommended to improve the QOL and the life expectancy of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davood Hekmatpou
- Nursing Department, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Azadeh Nasiri
- Nursing Department, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Fatholah Mohaghegh
- Medicine Department, Medical Faculty, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ekstedt M, Rustøen T. Factors That Hinder and Facilitate Cancer Patients' Knowledge About Pain Management-A Qualitative Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:753-760.e1. [PMID: 30593908 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pain management education may improve pain control for some patients, whereas individual differences exist. OBJECTIVES To evaluate possible critical components, facilitators, and hindrances for improved knowledge about pain management, in not hospitalized adult oncology patients with pain from bone metastasis participating in a pain management intervention. METHODS This substudy is a qualitative evaluation of the PRO-SELF Pain Control Program, tested in a randomized controlled trial. During six weeks, 87 participants in the intervention group received tailored coaching encounters by a trained oncology nurse. Three encounters for each patient were audio recorded. The encounter between patient's with the largest (n = 12) and lowest (n = 8) change in knowledge about pain management from before to after the intervention was transcribed verbatim and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The critical components of the intervention were repetition of information, struggling with resistance, use of peer experiences, and keeping track of variations. Facilitators of improvement were patients' trust and preparedness to try new procedures, the patient's self-awareness and body awareness, and taking active role in own care. Difficulties in processing complex information, culturally conditioned behaviors, fear, and lack of knowledge were the most important barriers to the success of the intervention. CONCLUSION Education in pain management in cancer patients requires repeated information, allowing time for overcoming resistance related to dysfunctional beliefs and fear. To facilitate the patient's involvement in their pain management, tailored and person-centered education is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Ekstedt
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden; Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tone Rustøen
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vaismoradi M, Amaniyan S, Jordan S. Patient Safety and Pro Re Nata Prescription and Administration: A Systematic Review. PHARMACY 2018; 6:E95. [PMID: 30158511 PMCID: PMC6163482 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy6030095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PRN is the acronym for 'pro re nata,' written against prescriptions whose administration should be based on patients' needs, rather than at set times. The aim of this systematic review was to explore safety issues and adverse events arising from PRN prescription and administration. Electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed [including Medline], Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science and ProQuest were systematically searched to retrieve articles published from 2005 to 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA we included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies with comparison groups, comparing PRN prescription and administration with scheduled administration, where safety issues and adverse events were reported. The authors independently assessed titles, abstracts and full-texts of retrieved studies based on inclusion criteria and risk of bias. Results were summarised narratively. The search identified 7699 articles. Title, abstract and full-text appraisals yielded 5 articles. The included studies were RCTs with one exception, a pre-test post-test experimental design. Patient populations, interventions and outcomes varied. Studies compared patient-controlled or routine administration with PRN and one trial assessed the effect of a practice guideline on implementation of PRN administration. More analgesia was administered in the patient-controlled than the PRN arms but pain reduction was similar. However, there was little difference in administration of psychotropic medicines. No differences between patient-controlled and PRN groups were reported for adverse events. The PRN practice guideline improved PRN patient education but non-documentation of PRN administration increased. This systematic review suggests that PRN safety issues and adverse events are an under-researched area of healthcare practice. Variations in the interventions, outcomes and clinical areas make it difficult to judge the overall quality of the evidence. Well-designed RCTs are needed to identify any safety issues and adverse events associated with PRN administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway.
| | - Sara Amaniyan
- Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733171, Iran.
| | - Sue Jordan
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Budhwani S, Wodchis WP, Zimmermann C, Moineddin R, Howell D. Self-management, self-management support needs and interventions in advanced cancer: a scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2018; 9:12-25. [PMID: 30121581 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Patients with advanced cancer can experience illness trajectories similar to other progressive chronic disease conditions where undertaking self-management (SM) and provision of self-management support (SMS) becomes important. The main objectives of this study were to map the literature of SM strategies and SMS needs of patients with advanced cancer and to describe SMS interventions tested in this patient population. A scoping review of all literature published between 2002 and 2016 was conducted. A total of 11 094 articles were generated for screening from MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases. A final 55 articles were extracted for inclusion in the review. Included studies identified a wide variety of SM behaviours used by patients with advanced cancer including controlling and coping with the physical components of the disease and facilitating emotional and psychosocial adjustments to a life-limiting illness. Studies also described a wide range of SMS needs, SMS interventions and their effectiveness in this patient population. Findings suggest that SMS interventions addressing SMS needs should be based on a sound understanding of the core skills required for effective SM and theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Future research should examine how a patient-oriented SMS approach can be incorporated into existing models of care delivery and the effects of SMS on quality of life and health system utilisation in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suman Budhwani
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Health System Performance Research Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Health System Performance Research Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Eaton LH, Brant JM, McLeod K, Yeh C. Nonpharmacologic Pain Interventions: A Review of Evidence-Based Practices for Reducing Chronic Cancer Pain
. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2018; 21:54-70. [PMID: 28524909 DOI: 10.1188/17.cjon.s3.54-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is a common issue for patients with cancer and can be challenging to manage effectively. Healthcare professionals need to be knowledgeable about evidence-based nonpharmacologic interventions.
. OBJECTIVES This systematic review critically appraises the strength and quality of the empirical evidence for nonpharmacologic interventions in reducing chronic cancer pain.
. METHODS Intervention studies were critically appraised and summarized by an Oncology Nursing Society Putting Evidence Into Practice team of RNs, advanced practice nurses, and nurse scientists. A level of evidence and a practice recommendation was assigned to each intervention.
. FINDINGS Based on evidence, recommended interventions to reduce chronic cancer pain are celiac plexus block for pain related to pancreatic and abdominal cancers and radiation therapy for bone pain. Although psychoeducational interventions are considered likely to be effective, the effective components of these interventions and their dose and duration need to be determined through additional research.
Collapse
|
26
|
Oldenmenger WH, Geerling JI, Mostovaya I, Vissers KC, de Graeff A, Reyners AK, van der Linden YM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient-based educational interventions to improve cancer-related pain. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 63:96-103. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
27
|
Spichiger E, Valenta S. [Not Available]. PRAXIS 2018; 107:71-76. [PMID: 29338627 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Krebsbedingte Schmerzen sind häufig, für Betroffene sehr belastend und oft ungenügend behandelt. Krebs ist zur chronischen Krankheit geworden; viele Patienten sind gefordert zu Hause selber oder mit Unterstützung von Angehörigen mit Therapien und Auswirkungen der Erkrankung zurechtzukommen. Dazu gehört auch das Schmerz-Selbstmanagement. Dieses ist komplex und verlangt spezifisches Wissen und Können, um eine Schmerztherapie im Alltag erfolgreich umzusetzen. Oft gelingt dies nicht, weil patientenbezogene Barrieren wie Bedenken gegenüber Opiaten eine gute Schmerzkontrolle verhindern. Mit getesteten Interventionen konnten teilweise moderate Schmerzreduktionen erreicht werden. Wegen unterschiedlichen methodischen Ansätzen und Interventionen bleibt offen, wie eine Unterstützung von Patienten und pflegenden Angehörigen am wirksamsten erfolgt. Es empfiehlt sich, Patienten zu informieren, dabei bekannte Barrieren anzugehen, Können zu vermitteln und pflegende Angehörige einzubeziehen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Spichiger
- 1 Pflegewissenschaft, Departement Public Health, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Basel
- 2 Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern
| | - Sabine Valenta
- 1 Pflegewissenschaft, Departement Public Health, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Basel
- 3 Klinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsspital Basel
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chou PL, Rau KM, Yu TW, Huang TL, Sun JL, Wang SY, Lin CC. Patient-clinician relationship seems to affect adherence to analgesic use in cancer patients: a cross sectional study in a Taiwanese population. Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29:935-940. [PMID: 29087488 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Patient satisfaction can provide a measure of service quality and serve as a predictor of health-related behaviors. Little is known about how patients' satisfaction with clinician-patient interactions affects their adherence to taking analgesics. The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate the predictors of patients' satisfaction with clinicians, and (2) examine whether patients' satisfaction with their clinicians can improve adherence to analgesic use. Design A cross-sectional and descriptive design was used. Setting Outpatient oncology clinic at a medical center in Taiwan. Participants A convenience sample (N = 309) was recruited. Main outcome measures The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale 21 - Chinese Version, Short Version of the Barriers Questionnaire - Taiwan Form, Taiwanese version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Measure, and Interpersonal Physician Trust Scale - Chinese version, and Brief Pain Inventory Chinese Version. Results Variables that could significantly predict patients' satisfaction were patient age and trust in clinicians, which together accounted for 33% of the total variance. Patients' satisfaction with their clinicians significantly predicted patients' adherence to medication use (OR = 3.10, P < 0.05). There was an interactive effect (OR = 0.12, P < 0.05) between patients' satisfaction and barriers to analgesic use. Correlation coefficients between barriers to analgesic use and patients' adherence are -0.52 (P < 0.001) and -0.13 (P = 0.20) in the higher satisfaction and lower satisfaction patients, respectively. Conclusions Patients' satisfaction with their clinicians can have a positive effect on changing analgesics adherence behaviors when patients hold incorrect beliefs about analgesics. Patients' satisfaction has an important role in enhancement of analgesics adherence behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pi-Ling Chou
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Nursing supervisor, Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Rau
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Wei Yu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Paochien Hospital, Pingtung City, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Lin Huang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jia-Ling Sun
- Department of Nursing, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yi Wang
- Loretto Heights School of Nursing, Regis University, CO, USA
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,FAAN, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professor in Nursing and School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25:1323-1355. [PMID: 28058570 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3500-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review was intended to identify the effectiveness and inclusion of essential components of self-management education interventions to support patients with cancer in developing the skills needed for effective self-management of their disease and the acute or immediate, long-term, and late harmful effects of treatments. METHODS Self-management education interventions were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing at least one of the eight core elements outlined by the research team. A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE (2005 through April 2015), Embase (2005 to 2015, week 15), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 4, April 2015), CINAHL (2005 to 2015) and PsychINFO (2005 to 2015). Keywords searched include 'self-management patient education' or 'patient education'. RESULTS Forty-two RCTs examining self-management education interventions for patients with cancer were identified. Heterogeneity of interventions precluded meta-analysis, but narrative qualitative synthesis suggested that self-management education interventions improve symptoms of fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, emotional distress and quality of life. Results for specific combinations of core elements were inconclusive. Very few studies used the same combinations of core elements, and among those that did, results were conflicting. Thus, conclusions as to the components or elements of self-management education interventions associated with the strength of the effects could not be assessed by this review. CONCLUSION Defining the core components of cancer self-management education and the fundamental elements for inclusion in supporting effective self-management will be critical to ensure consistent and effective provision of self-management support in the cancer system.
Collapse
|
30
|
Body J, Terpos E, Tombal B, Hadji P, Arif A, Young A, Aapro M, Coleman R. Bone health in the elderly cancer patient: A SIOG position paper. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 51:46-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
31
|
Adam R, Burton CD, Bond CM, de Bruin M, Murchie P. Can patient-reported measurements of pain be used to improve cancer pain management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2016; 7:0. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
32
|
Comparison of Oncology Patients’ and Their Family Caregivers’ Attitudes and Concerns Toward Pain and Pain Management. Cancer Nurs 2016; 39:328-34. [DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
33
|
Knobf M, Cooley M, Duffy S, Doorenbos A, Eaton L, Given B, Mayer D, McCorkle R, Miaskowski C, Mitchell S, Sherwood P, Bender C, Cataldo J, Hershey D, Katapodi M, Menon U, Schumacher K, Sun V, Ah D, LoBiondo-Wood G, Mallory G. The 2014–2018 Oncology Nursing Society Research Agenda. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015; 42:450-65. [DOI: 10.1188/15.onf.450-465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
34
|
Abstract
Cancer pain management is a major element of successful cancer survivorship. Regardless of where someone is along the cancer experience, from a newly diagnosed patient to long-term survivor, pain is a potential treatment-related effect that can have a significant impact on a survivor's life. Quality pain management for cancer survivors is complicated by the fact that cancer-related pain can be due to the tumor, surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Additionally, the pain experience is related to many psychosocial/spiritual factors. Despite almost 40 years of attention devoted to improving cancer pain management, many cancer survivors are less than optimally treated, often owing to survivor and healthcare provider knowledge barriers. This article reviews some of the latest research related to cancer pain management treatment options, measurement/assessment, and interventions. Progress has been made in understanding new aspects of the pain experience, but more work is yet to be done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Schreiber
- University of Louisville, School of Nursing, 555 S. Floyd St., Room 4057, Louisville, KY, 40592, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Agboola SO, Ju W, Elfiky A, Kvedar JC, Jethwani K. The effect of technology-based interventions on pain, depression, and quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17:e65. [PMID: 25793945 PMCID: PMC4381812 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The burden of cancer is increasing; projections over the next 2 decades suggest that the annual cases of cancer will rise from 14 million in 2012 to 22 million. However, cancer patients in the 21st century are living longer due to the availability of novel therapeutic regimens, which has prompted a growing focus on maintaining patients’ health-related quality of life. Telehealth is increasingly being used to connect with patients outside of traditional clinical settings, and early work has shown its importance in improving quality of life and other clinical outcomes in cancer care. Objective The aim of this study was to systematically assess the literature for the effect of supportive telehealth interventions on pain, depression, and quality of life in cancer patients via a systematic review of clinical trials. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and PsycINFO in July 2013 and updated the literature search again in January 2015 for prospective randomized trials evaluating the effect of telehealth interventions in cancer care with pain, depression, and quality of life as main outcomes. Two of the authors independently reviewed and extracted data from eligible randomized controlled trials, based on pre-determined selection criteria. Methodological quality of studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Results Of the 4929 articles retrieved from databases and relevant bibliographies, a total of 20 RCTs were included in the final review. The studies were largely heterogeneous in the type and duration of the intervention as well as in outcome assessments. A majority of the studies were telephone-based interventions that remotely connected patients with their health care provider or health coach. The intervention times ranged from 1 week to 12 months. In general, most of the studies had low risk of bias across the domains of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, but most of the studies had insufficient information about the allocation concealment domain. Two of the three studies focused on pain control reported significant effects of the intervention; four of the nine studies focus on depression reported significant effects, while only the studies that were focused on quality of life reported significant effects. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates the potential of telehealth interventions in improving outcomes in cancer care. However, more high-quality large-sized trials are needed to demonstrate cogent evidence of its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen O Agboola
- Partners Healthcare Center for Connected Health, Boston, MA, United States.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Agboola S, Kamdar M, Flanagan C, Searl M, Traeger L, Kvedar J, Jethwani K. Pain management in cancer patients using a mobile app: study design of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2014; 3:e76. [PMID: 25500281 PMCID: PMC4275494 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Revised: 11/22/2014] [Accepted: 11/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the availability of effective medications and clinical guidelines for pain management, pain control is suboptimal in a sizeable proportion of patients with cancer pain. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend a comprehensive and multimodal approach for management of cancer pain. We developed a mobile phone application, ePAL, based on clinical guidelines to empower patients for cancer pain management by prompting regular pain assessments and coaching for self-management. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of a multidimensional mobile phone-based pain management application, ePAL, on controlling cancer pain and improving quality of life in patients with cancer pain being treated at an academic palliative care clinic. METHODS The study will be implemented as a 2-arm randomized controlled trial with 110 adult patients with CP who own a mobile phone over a follow-up period of two months. Participants will be randomized to either the intervention group receiving ePAL and usual care or to a control group receiving only usual care. The brief pain inventory will be used to assess our primary outcome which is pain intensity. We will also evaluate the effect of the intervention on secondary outcomes which include the effect of the intervention on hospital utilization for pain crisis, quality of life, adherence to analgesic medications, barriers to pain control, anxiety and patient engagement. Instruments that will be used in evaluating secondary outcomes include the Brief Pain Inventory, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, Barriers Questionnaire-II, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue. The intention-to-treat approach will be used to evaluate outcomes. Our primary outcome, pain intensity, measured longitudinally over eight weeks, will be assessed by mixed model repeated analysis. Effect sizes will be calculated as mean group differences with standard deviations. RESULTS The study is still in progress. We hope to have results by the end of 2015. CONCLUSIONS The multidimensional approach to pain management implemented on a mobile phone application could lead to significant improvements in patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02069743; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02069743 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Qb65XGGA).
Collapse
|