Components of the Advance Care Planning Process in the Nursing Home Setting

Family perspectives on and experiences with advance care planning in nursing homes: A thematic synthesis

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize family members' experiences and perspectives on advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes.

METHODS

The thematic synthesis is reported following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. A systematic search of the APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Embase and PubMed databases is initially conducted in October 2022, and the search is updated in January 2024. Qualitative studies that presented family members' quotes regarding advance care planning in nursing homes published in a peer-reviewed journal were included. Screening and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved with the assistance of the third author.

RESULTS

A total of 1027 articles were identified, and 23 articles were included in the full-text review. Subsequently, a total of 17 studies were ultimately included, and 127 quotes were extracted and analysed. The main findings were categorized into three themes: (1) invitation to conversation and care, (2) the resident's surrogate and (3) nurses. Considering the importance of family members' roles in ACP conversations in a nursing home setting, this study provided an in-depth understanding of family members' perceptions and experiences of ACP by synthesizing qualitative studies. Family members' lack of knowledge regarding the timing and pursuits of ACP was also identified.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study provide synthesized qualitative evidence of family members' perspectives on ACP, which can inform care and treatment in nursing homes. As this study synthesizes the experiences of family members in nursing homes about ACP, the findings of this study contribute to reflecting family members' experiences and providing evidence for nursing home healthcare professionals.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study reports the experiences of family members in ACP nursing homes. The findings of this study contribute to reflecting family members' experiences and building evidence for nursing home healthcare professionals.

A study protocol for e-PainSupport: The use of a digital application for reporting pain and pain management in home hospice

High pain intensity is commonly experienced by patients with serious advanced illness. Impediments to improving pain intensity in home hospice include poor adherence to a pain management regimen due to caregivers' lack of knowledge and self-efficacy (confidence) in administering analgesics. e-PainSupport is a self-administered, digital application directly linked to patients' medical records. It has three elements: Education Module, Patient Pain Record, and the Pain Summary for Nurses. This study will test the effects of e-PainSupport on pain intensity when used by patients, caregivers, and nurses. The study's specific aims are as follows: Aim 1, compare the effects of e-PainSupport to a standard care condition, controlling for covariates (role [patient or caregiver], age, sex, ethnicity, education, and patient's diagnosis), on clinical improvement in pain intensity (primary outcome) and significant improvement on a pain intensity scale (secondary outcome); Aim 2, examine the mediating effects of patient and caregiver knowledge, self-efficacy, and adherence on change in pain intensity during 2 weeks, controlling for covariates and treatment condition; and Aim 3, identify nurses' perceptions of the use of e-PainSupport, including facilitators for and barriers to integration into agency workflow and benefits for patients. Participants (132 triads of patients, caregivers, and hospice nurses) will be recruited from Midwest hospice agencies. Patient and caregiver outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks later. Data will be analyzed with multilevel modeling. Post-intervention, semi-structured interviews with nurses in the e-PainSupport condition will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify perceived practice changes. e-PainSupport has the potential to facilitate nurse-patient communication and improve hospice patient pain management.

Nursing Home Resident, Family, and Staff Perspectives on Achieving Comfort at End of Life: A Qualitative Study

Increasing numbers of US older adults die in long-term care facilities. This qualitative study explored nursing home resident, family member, and staff perspectives and preferences regarding end-of-life care for the resident. From 67 potential participants referred by staff, 47 were found eligible and consented, including 16 residents, 10 family members, and 20 staff. A semistructured questionnaire guided the interview process and included questions such as what matters most at the end of life and whether participants would opt for any of the 8 aggressive treatments proposed for a resident at the end of life. Data were analyzed using descriptive and pattern coding for thematic interpretation. The 3 themes that emerged were centrality of comfort, what matters most at the end of life, and promoting comfort. All participant groups overwhelmingly endorsed comfort as a priority. Some participants would accept aggressive treatment to alleviate suffering and promote comfort. Residents were concerned about the well-being of their families, whereas family members emphasized the importance of their presence and that their dying relatives were not suffering. Staff sometimes filled this role on their behalf. Ancillary staff emphasized bathing, dressing, and grooming the resident to preserve the resident's dignity. The results support comfort as a priority for care at the end of life and the need for more discussion to increase mutual agreement on goals of care and what promotes comfort for the resident and family.

Telehealth Palliative Care in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Many adults older than 65 spend time in a nursing home (NH) at the end of life where specialist palliative care is limited. However, telehealth may improve access to palliative care services. A review of the literature was conducted to synthesize the evidence for telehealth palliative care in NHs to provide recommendations for practice, research, and policy.

DESIGN

Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews frameworks were used to guide this literature review.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Reviewed articles focused on residents in NHs with telehealth palliative care interventionists operating remotely. Participants included NH residents, care partner(s), and NH staff/clinicians.

METHODS

We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (WileyOnline), Scopus (Elsevier), CINHAL (EBSCOhost), Trip PRO, and Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest) in June 2021, with an update in January 2022. We included observational and qualitative studies, clinical trials, quality improvement projects, and case and clinical reports that self-identified as telehealth palliative care for NH residents.

RESULTS

The review yielded 11 eligible articles published in the United States and internationally from 2008 to 2020. Articles described live video as the preferred telehealth delivery modality with goals of care and physical aspects of care being most commonly addressed. Findings in the articles focused on 5 patient and family-centered outcomes: symptom management, quality of life, advance care planning, health care use, and evaluation of care. Consistent benefits of telehealth palliative care included increased documentation of goals of care and decrease in acute care use. Disadvantages included technological difficulties and increased NH financial burden.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although limited in scope and quality, the current evidence for telehealth palliative care interventions shows promise for improving quality and outcomes of serious illness care in NHs. Future empirical studies should focus on intervention effectiveness, implementation outcomes (eg, managing technology), stakeholders' experience, and costs.

Cultural impediments to frank communication regarding end-of-life care between older nursing home residents and their family members in Taiwan: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

When older nursing home residents and their families are faced with end-of-life care decisions in Taiwan, they make them in the context of traditional cultural norms and socioeconomic changes. Both parties (residents and their family members) are often unwilling to broach the topic, leading to a decisional impasse. The aim of this study was to understand difficult-to-raise issues related to end-of-life care by investigating the perspectives of older nursing home residents and their family members.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study was conducted using content analysis based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants, and sampling continued until data saturation. Data were collected using semi structured interviews, and related analyses were conducted using an inductive approach.

RESULTS

Ten residents and twelve family members were interviewed individually. Six main themes were identified: (1) the inevitability of a goodbye; (2) a good death; (3) going with or against traditional culture; (4) better a good death than a bad life; (5) abiding by the residents' decisions; and (6) being willing but unable to take care of residents.

CONCLUSION

Nursing home residents and their family members' thoughts on end-of-life care shifted toward the concept of a good death, and they even regarded death as a form of liberation. Health care providers may serve as mediators to counsel a resident and their family members separately, enabling them to speak up and understand each other's thoughts on end-of-life care before a decision is made so that neither party has regrets.

Effect of advance care planning video on do-not-hospitalize orders for nursing home residents with advanced illness

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of an Advance Care Planning (ACP) Video Program on documented Do-Not-Hospitalize (DNH) orders among nursing home (NH) residents with advanced illness.

METHODS

Secondary analysis on a subset of NHs enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial (41 NHs in treatment arm implemented the ACP Video Program: 69 NHs in control arm employed usual ACP practices). Participants included long (> 100 days) and short (≤ 100 days) stay residents with advanced illness (advanced dementia or cardiopulmonary disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure)) in NHs from March 1, 2016 to May 31, 2018 without a documented Do-Not-Hospitalize (DNH) order at baseline. Logistic regression with covariate adjustments was used to estimate the impact of the resident being in a treatment versus control NH on: the proportion of residents with new DNH orders during follow-up; and the proportion of residents with any hospitalization during follow-up. Clustering at the facility-level was addressed using hierarchical models.

RESULTS

The cohort included 6,117 residents with advanced illness (mean age (SD) = 82.8 (8.4) years, 65% female). Among long-stay residents (n = 3,902), 9.3% (SE, 2.2; 95% CI 5.0-13.6) and 4.2% (SE, 1.1; 95% CI 2.1-6.3) acquired a new DNH order in the treatment and control arms, respectively (average marginal effect, (AME) 5.0; SE, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.3-9.8). Among short-stay residents with advanced illness (n = 2,215), 8.0% (SE, 1.6; 95% CI 4.6-11.3) and 3.5% (SE 1.0; 95% CI 1.5-5.5) acquired a new DNH order in the treatment and control arms, respectively (AME 4.4; SE, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.5-8.3). Proportion of residents with any hospitalizations did not differ between arms in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to usual care, an ACP Video Program intervention increased documented DNH orders among NH residents with advanced disease but did not significantly reduce hospitalizations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02612688 .

Analysis of the Management Effect of Cancer Patients after Oral Chemotherapy Based on Nursing Process Reengineering

With the pollution of the environment and the acceleration of the social rhythm, the prevalence of tumors has increased year by year, and tumors have brought huge pain and inconvenience to patients. However, traditional nursing work consumes a lot of manpower and material resources, but it is difficult to improve the happiness of cancer patients, and it also brings a lot of troubles to many nursing workers. Based on the above reasons, we reengineered the traditional nursing process based on the BPR theory and applied the new process to the analysis of the management effect of cancer patients after oral chemotherapy drugs. The data shows that there are 23 patients with no pressure ulcer risk (score greater than 19) before care, 27 patients with low risk (15-19 points), 32 patients with moderate risk (13-14 points), and 18 people at high risk (less than 12 points). After nursing, there were 82 patients with no pressure ulcer risk, 10 patients with low risk, 7 patients with moderate risk, and 1 patient with high risk. This shows that the risk of pressure ulcers in patients with cancer after the use of chemotherapy drugs is significantly reduced compared with those without nursing. Nursing intervention can improve the psychological state of cancer patients during the recovery period, and nursing intervention can promote the compliance of cancer patients in various aspects of rehabilitation.

Communicating With Nursing Home Residents About End of Life

Approximately 33% of the 1.2 million older individuals residing in nursing homes have the capacity to discuss their preferences for end-of-life care, and 35% will die within their first year in the nursing home. These conversations necessary to promote care consistent with the resident's preferences are often limited and most often occur when the resident is actively dying. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to understand the resident's perspectives on end-of-life communication in the nursing home and suggest approaches to facilitate this communication. We interviewed 46 participants (16 residents, 10 family members, and 20 staff) in a Southeast Florida nursing home from January to May 2019. The data were analyzed using descriptive and pattern coding and matrices to decipher preliminary categories and thematic interpretation within and across each participant group. Two themes emerged from this secondary analysis that residents assume others know their end-of-life preferences, and past experiences may predict future end-of-life choices. Residents and family members were willing to discuss end-of-life care. Study findings also suggested that past experiences with the end-of-life and critical illness of another could impact residents' and family members' end-of-life care decisions, and that nurses' recognition of subtle signs of a resident's decline may trigger provider-initiated end-of-life conversations. Future research should focus on strategies to promote earlier end-of-life discussions to support independent decision-making about end-of-life care in this relatively dependent population of older adults.

"We Want to Sign It, But We Can't Do It": Results From a Qualitative Pilot Study of Experiences Related to Advance Directives Among Families of Older Residents in a Long-term Care Facility

This study aimed to clarify the experiences of family members of older adult residents regarding the signing of an advance directive in the context of a Chinese culture. Twenty family members of older residents in a long-term care facility participated in face-to-face interviews, and the researchers conducted a thematic analysis of observation field notes and interview transcripts. A content analysis of the interviews revealed 4 themes concerning the refusal to sign advance directives: resident decision, group decision, not entitled to decide, and random decision. Health providers may serve as mediators and pass on the residents' views regarding their end-of-life care to their families after holding discussions with residents and their families separately to ensure that an agreeable decision regarding the modes and objectives of EOL care is reached and that such a decision respects the right of the patient to choose.

Long-Term Care Nurses and Their Experiences With Patients' and Families' End-of-Life Preferences: A Focus Group Study

Long-term care (LTC) nurses are a critical nexus for patient communication and vital to advance care planning due to their professional role and breadth of patient relationships. The current study's aim was to explore the communication strategies Midwestern LTC nurses use to clarify patients' end-of-life (EOL) care preferences. Two focus groups used a phenomenological framework to elucidate the experiences of 14 RNs. Data analysis revealed two themes grounded in time: (a) nurses use time to assess patients' EOL situation and assist patients to discern care options; and (b) nurses educate patients about EOL care, adjust care plans, and develop trusting relationships. Two themes were grounded in clinical experience: (a) nurses become persistent advocates and educators to initiate and sustain EOL communication; and (b) nurses learn consistency in communication, including awareness of patients' nonverbal communication. Nurses shared that EOL communication is never "done"; time frames to assess, educate, and clarify are continuous. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 46(12), 23-29.].

End-of-Life Care Terminology: A Scoping Review

The purpose of this scoping review is to present an overview of terms found in publications associated with end-of-life care management that can impact decision making by patients, health care providers, and researchers. Connotative terminology and syntax can influence the decision-making approach and process. We examined 49 publications for positive, negative, and neutral connotations. We consistently found negative terminology in the publications. To advance the development of nursing knowledge regarding end-of-life care, researchers should be aware of their biases of terminology and syntax use. We propose modifications to language used in end-of-life care planning models and literature can improve care congruency.