Labor Nurses' Views of Their Influence on Cesarean Birth

Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Care

XXXX.

Reliability and Validity of a Perinatal Shared Decision-Making Measure: The Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test the psychometric properties of a shared decision-making tool: Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation (CHOICEs).

DESIGN

Multiphase instrument development study beginning with item development through a cross-sectional postpartum survey.

SETTING

The cross-sectional postpartum survey was distributed online through convenience and snowball sampling methods.

METHODS

We developed instrument items through an iterative process with key stakeholders. We evaluated reliability based on internal consistency and differential item functioning analysis. We evaluated validity on evidence of construct validity. We used criterion-related item mapping to evaluate whether the measure addressed the full spectrum of shared decision making related to maternity care.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 1,171 participants. A Cronbach's αcoefficient of .99 supported internal consistency reliability. Infit and outfit statistics that ranged from 0.92 to 1.55 supported item fit. Differential item functioning analysis showed that CHOICEs scores were invariant between different demographic groups. Significant positive correlations between scores on CHOICEs and the Mothers on Respect index (r = 0.75, p = .01) and the Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making scale (r = 0.75, p = .01) supported criterion-related validity. Item mapping suggested more items were needed to capture the full spectrum of shared decision making.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using CHOICEs to evaluate shared decision making in maternity care for research and quality improvement projects.

Method to Calculate Nurse-Specific Cesarean Rates for the First and Second Stages of Labor

To date, efforts to safely lower the cesarean birth rate for women with low-risk pregnancies have largely ignored the influence of labor and delivery nurses on mode of birth. This is mainly because of the complexity involved in attributing outcomes to specific nurses whose care had the greatest effect on mode of birth. An additional level of complexity arises from the type of care given to the woman during different stages of labor. In this article, we describe a strategy to designate nurses to births using an electronic medical record flowsheet, and we describe a method to calculate nurse-specific cesarean birth rates for the first and second stages of labor. Similar to physician-specific rates, we found wide variation in nurse-specific cesarean birth rates in both stages of labor, which suggests an opportunity to learn from best practices.

Perinatal Quality and Equity-Indicators That Address Disparities

There is tremendous attention in maternal and neonatal disparities, particularly disparities of race and ethnicity and subsequent outcomes that continue despite calls to action. The literature has offered potential opportunities for exploring data related to racial and ethnic disparities, including the utilization of a race and ethnicity reporting dashboard. This article reviews definitions of perinatal quality and disparity and provides insight into the development of a nationally targeted race and ethnicity dashboard. This quarterly dashboard provides hospitals with specific key metric outcomes through the lens of race and ethnicity, provides a national benchmark for comparison, and creates a data platform for team exploration and comprehensive review of findings. An overview of the development of the dashboard is provided, and the selection of key maternal and neonatal metrics is reviewed. In addition, recommendations for data science strategic planning and nursing's role in metric development, analysis, and utilization are offered and key steps in accelerating disparity data into everyday clinical care are discussed.

Association of Clinical Nursing Work Environment with Quality and Safety in Maternity Care in the United States

PURPOSE

Maternal outcomes in the United States are the poorest of any high-income country. Efforts to improve the quality and safety of maternity care are frequently reported by individual hospitals, limiting generalizability. The purpose of this study is to describe maternity care quality and safety in hospitals in four states.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study is a secondary analysis of the Panel Study of Effects of Changes in Nursing on Patient Outcomes data. Registered nurses reported on maternity unit quality, safety, and work environment. Descriptive statistics and clustered linear regressions were used.

RESULTS

The sample included 1,165 nurses reporting on 166 units in California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Florida in 2015. One-third of nurses, on average, gave their units an overall safety grade of "excellent," but this decreased to less than one-sixth of nurses in units with poor work environments. Overall, 65% of nurses reported that their mistakes were held against them. A good work environment, compared with poor, was significantly associated with fewer nurses grading safety as poor (β -35.6, 95% CI -42.9 - -28.3).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our research found that the nurses in the majority of hospitals with maternity units in four states representing a quarter of the nation's annual births felt their units do not provide excellent quality care and have a less than optimal safety climate.

Theory analysis of social justice in nursing: Applications to obstetric violence research

The dual purpose of this article is to present a formal theory analysis combined with recommendations for the use of social justice in nursing as a framework for the study of obstetric violence in US hospitals. A theory analysis of emancipatory nursing praxis as a middle-range theory of social justice in nursing was conducted using the strategy by Walker and Avant. The theory of social justice in nursing was determined to be logical, useful, and generalizable. The soundness and usability of the theory support the recommendations made for it to be applied to the study of obstetric violence, plus quality and outcome problems in maternity care that have been resistant to sustained progress and may benefit from a new paradigm for continued study. The alignment for obstetric violence to be studied with a social justice framework is linked to the theory's origins in critical social theory and the evolving concept of obstetric violence as a sex-specific form of violence against women that is a violation of human rights. The postmodern expansion of the body of work based on critical theory provides examples from emancipatory and feminist researchers for recognizing how the study of obstetric violence is compatible with a theoretical framework for social justice in nursing. The suitability of this framework to guide the further research needed to better understand, identify, and minimize harms from the occurrence of obstetric violence is argued. In addition, "The Code" for the American Nurses Association (ANA) is cited as a professional reference that outlines nurses' responsibilities for practice based on ethics, human rights, and social justice that are antithetical to the occurrence of obstetric violence.

Improving Nurse Self-Efficacy and Increasing Continuous Labor Support With the Promoting Comfort in Labor Safety Bundle

OBJECTIVE

To increase nurse self-efficacy and the use of continuous labor support and to reduce the rate of primary cesareans among nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies by implementing the Promoting Comfort in Labor safety bundle.

DESIGN

A quality improvement project with a pre-post practice implementation design. This practice change was part of the Reducing Primary Cesarean Learning Collaborative from the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

SETTING

A Level II regional hospital in Virginia with more than 2,600 births annually. Births are attended by certified nurse-midwives and physicians.

PARTICIPANTS

Nursing staff on the labor and delivery unit in March 2016 (n = 27), September 2017 (n = 20), and June 2019 (n = 24).

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

We updated policies, educated nurses, procured labor support equipment, and modified documentation of care. We measured nurse confidence and skill in labor support techniques with the Self-Efficacy Labor Support Scale over 4 years. We tracked how many women were provided continuous labor support and the primary cesarean birth rate among women who were nulliparous and low risk.

RESULTS

Nurses' mean self-efficacy scores increased from 76.67 in 2016 to 86.96 in 2019 (p < .001). The proportion of women who were provided continuous labor support increased from a baseline of 4.38% (47/1,074) in January 2015 through March 2016 to 18.06% (82/454) in July through December 2019 (p < .001). The primary cesarean birth rate for nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies remained stable, at approximately 18% from 2015 to 2019.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the Comfort in Labor Safety Bundle improved nurse self-efficacy in labor support techniques and increased the frequency of continuous labor support.

Variability in cesarean delivery rates among individual labor and delivery nurses compared to physicians at three attribution time points

OBJECTIVE

To examine the variability in the cesarean delivery (CD) rates of individual labor and delivery nurses compared with physicians at three attribution time points.

DATA SOURCES

Medical record data from nine hospitals in Washington State from January 2016 through September 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, observational cohort design using an aggregated database of birth records.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Chart-abstracted clinical data from a subset of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex births attributed at admission, labor management, and delivery to nurses and physicians. Two classification methods were used to categorize nurse- and physician-level CD rates at three attribution time points and the reliability of these methods compared.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The sample included 12 556 births, 319 nurses, and 126 physicians. Overall, variation in nurse-level CD rates did not differ significantly across the three attribution time points, and the extent of variation was similar to that observed in physicians. However, agreement between attribution time points varied between 35 percent and 65 percent when classifying individual nurses into the top and bottom deciles. The average reliability of nurse-level CD rates was 32 percent at admission (IQR 22.0 percent to 38.7 percent), 32.6 percent at labor (IQR 23.1 percent to 40.9 percent), and 29.3 percent (IQR 20.9 percent to 35.8 percent) at delivery. The average reliability of physician-level CD rates was higher: 54.2 percent (IQR 38.7 percent to 71.4 percent) at admission, 62.5 percent (IQR 49.0 percent to 79.6 percent) at labor management, and 66.1 percent (IQR 53.7 percent to 81.2 percent) at delivery.

CONCLUSION

Feedback on nurse-level CD rates as part of routine clinical quality audits can provide insight into nurse performance in the context of other individual-level and unit-level information. To reliably distinguish individual nurse performance, larger sample sizes are needed.

Nursing Support During Latent Phase Labor: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the literature on nursing support during the latent phase of the first stage of labor. In 2014, the definition of the beginning of active labor changed from 4 centimeters (cm) to 6 cm cervical dilation. More women may have an induction of labor based on results of recent research showing no causal increase in risk of cesarean birth with elective induction of labor for low-risk nulliparous women. Therefore, in-hospital latent phase labor may be longer, increasing the need for nursing support.

DESIGN

Scoping review of the literature from 2009 to present.

METHODS

We conducted the review using key words in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus. Search terms included different combinations of "latent or early labor," "birth," "support," "nursing support," "obstetrics," and "onset of labor." Peer-reviewed research and quality improvement articles from 2009 to present were included if they had specific implications for nursing care during the latent phase of labor. Articles were excluded if they were not specific to nursing, focused exclusively on tool development, or were from the perspective of pregnant women or providers only.

RESULTS

Ten articles were included. Results were synthesized into six categories; support of physiologic labor and birth, the nurse's own personal view of labor, birth environment, techniques and tools, decision-making, and importance of latent labor discussion during the prenatal period.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Support for physiologic labor and birth is an important consideration for use of nonpharmacological methods during latent labor. The nurse's own personal view on labor support can influence the support that laboring women receive. Nurses may need additional education on labor support methods.

Oxytocin Guidelines Associated with Compliance to National Standards

OBJECTIVE

Develop a multidisciplinary, consensus-driven, evidence-based approach to oxytocin use, while adhering to national guidelines.

DESIGN

This was a quality improvement project that used the Plan Do Study Act method to create cycles of change over several years. To initiate discussion, a survey was administered at a social event for providers from divergent community practices that addressed the controversial aspects of oxytocin use. Graphic feedback was provided showing divergences between answers and the evidence. The perinatal team directed design and implementation of this project with specific involvement of a nurse quality improvement coordinator and nurse educator.

MEASURES

Process, outcome, and balancing measures were used to evaluate the program. Process measure: use of a standardized order-set.

OUTCOME MEASURE

rate of adherence to the resultant protocol. Balancing measures: 1) maximum oxytocin dose, 2) time from oxytocin initiation to birth, 3) cesarean birth rates, and 4) Apgar scores.

RESULTS

An initial increase in adherence to the protocol decreased with the loss of the "paper" order-set. Adherence improved when computerized physician order entry was adjusted: 2006: 73%, 2007: 95%; 2011: 57%, 2013: 100% (p = 0.007, 2006 vs. 2007) (p < 0.001, 2006 vs. 2013). Compliance with the protocol was associated with a decrease in maximum oxytocin dose and in time between oxytocin initiation and birth (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Consistency and safety in patient care can be accomplished using literature-based evidence and active consensus building among members of the perinatal team. A standardization process must be integrated into the electronic medical record to become a sustained part of a practice culture.

Adherence to the AWHONN Staffing Guidelines as Perceived by Labor Nurses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the degree to which registered nurses perceive their labor and delivery units to be adhering to Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) staffing guidelines.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study via an online survey of labor nurses recruited from hospitals in three states.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

In late 2016 and early 2017, labor nurses in selected hospitals in California, Michigan, and New Jersey were contacted via e-mail invitation to participate in a study about nursing care during labor and birth. Nurse leaders in each hospital facilitated the invitations.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 615 labor nurses from 67 hospitals.

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Most nurses reported that the AWHONN nurse staffing guidelines were frequently or always followed in all aspects of care surveyed. Hospitals with annual birth volumes of 500 to 999 range were significantly more likely than hospitals with 2,500 or more annual births to be perceived as compliant with AWHONN staffing guidelines.

CONCLUSION

When the AWHONN staffing guidelines were first published in 2010, there was concern among some nurse leaders that they would not be adopted into clinical practice, yet nurses in our sample overwhelmingly perceived their hospitals to be guideline compliant. There remains much more work to be done to determine nurse-sensitive outcomes for maternity care and to ensure that all women in labor in the United States are cared for by nurses who are not overburdened or distracted by being assigned more women than can be safely handled.

Nurses' perceptions of the dynamics and impacts of teamwork with physicians in labour and delivery

Interprofessional teamwork is touted as essential to positive patient, staff, and organizational outcomes. However, differing understandings of teamwork and divergent professional cultures amongst healthcare providers influence the success of teamwork. In labour and delivery, nurse-physician teamwork is vital to safe, family-centered maternity care. In this focused ethnography, the perceptions of obstetrical nurses were sought to understand nurse-physician teamwork and the features that facilitate or impede it. These nurses acknowledged working in a normative hierarchy, with physicians ultimately responsible for patient care decision-making. They described myriad ways in which they navigated traditional power dynamics and smoothed working relationships with physicians, such as circumventing disrespectful behaviors, venting with each other, highlighting their own autonomy, using tactical communication, and managing unit resources. According to these nurses, key facilitators of functional nurse-physicians relationships were time, trust, respect, credibility, and social connection. Further, the nature of their working relationships with physicians influenced their perceptions regarding intent to stay, workplace morale, and patient outcomes.

Effects of an Interdisciplinary Practice Bundle for Second-Stage Labor on Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is renewed interest in second-stage labor practices as recent evidence has challenged historical perspectives on safe duration of second-stage labor. Traditional practices and routine interventions during second-stage have uncertain benefit for low-risk women and may result in cesarean birth.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement an interdisciplinary second-stage practice bundle to promote safe outcomes including method of birth and women's birth experience.

METHODS

Standardized second-stage labor evidence-based practice recommendations structured into a 5 Ps practice bundle (patience, positioning, physiologic resuscitation, progress, preventing urinary harm) were implemented across 34 birthing hospitals in the Trinity Health system.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were observed in second-stage practices. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses' perinatal nursing care quality measure Second-Stage of Labor: Mother-Initiated Spontaneous Pushing significantly improved [pre-implementation 43% (510/1,195), post-implementation 76% (1,541/2,028), p < .0001]. Joint Commission Perinatal Care-02: nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean rate significantly decreased (p = 0.02) with no differences in maternal morbidity, or negative newborn birth outcomes. Unexpected complications in term births significantly decreased in all newborns (p < 0.001), and for newborns from vaginal births (p = 0.03). Birth experience satisfaction rose from the 69th to the 81st percentile.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Implementing 13 evidence-based second-stage labor practices derived from the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the American College of Nurse-Midwives professional guidelines achieved our goals of safely reducing primary cesarean birth among low-risk nulliparous women, and optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes associated with labor and birth. By minimizing routine interventions, nurses support physiologic birth and improve women's birth satisfaction.