The importance of interpersonal treatment goals for depressed inpatients

Goal setting and goal attainment in patients with major depressive disorder: a narrative review on shared decision making in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

Narrative review of the processes of goal setting and goal attainment scaling, as practical approaches to operationalizing and implementing the principles of shared decision making (SDM) in the routine care of people living with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

We searched electronic databases for clinical studies published in English using key terms related to MDD and goal setting or goal attainment scaling. Two clinical studies of goal setting in MDD are considered in detail to exemplify the practicalities of the goal setting approach.

RESULTS

While SDM is widely recommended for people living with mental health problems, there is general agreement that it has thus far been implemented variably. In other areas of medicine, the process of goal setting is an established way to engage the patient, facilitate motivation, and assist the recovery process. For people living with MDD, the concept of goal setting is in its infancy, and only few studies have evaluated its clinical utility. Two clinical studies of vortioxetine for MDD demonstrate the utility of goal attainment scaling as an appropriate outcome for assessing functional improvement in ways that matter to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Goal setting is a pragmatic approach to turning the principles of SDM into realities of clinical practice and aligns with the principles of recovery that encompasses the notions of self-determination, self-management, personal growth, empowerment, and choice. Accumulating evidence supports the use of goal attainment scaling as an appropriate personalized outcome measure for use in clinical trials.

Nonresponder does not mean not better: Improvement in nonsymptom domains in complex depressed patients who are not symptomatic responders to intensive treatment

In treatment studies of depression, response is typically defined as a 50% or greater reduction in symptom severity. However, multiple surveys of depressed patients have found that patients prioritize improved functioning and quality of life objectives over symptom improvement as the most important goal of treatment. The goal of the present study is to widen the lens of assessing outcome by examining response in nonsymptom domains in patients who are, by convention, considered nonresponders to treatment. Eight hundred and forty-four patients with major depressive disorder completed the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ), a self-report measure that assesses multiple constructs considered by patients to be relevant to assessing treatment outcome. At discharge, the patients made a global rating of the effectiveness of treatment. The 517 patients who were nonresponders on the depression symptom subscale of the RDQ are the focus of this report. The patients showed significant levels of improvement from admission to discharge in all nonsymptom domains, with medium to large effect sizes. Approximately one-third of the patients were responders on at least 1 of the nonsymptom domains. The failure to meet the conventional definition of treatment response based on symptom severity does not preclude significant improvement in nonsymptom domains.

The relative importance of diagnostic specific and transdiagnostic factors in evaluating treatment outcome of depressed patients

Determinations of the efficacy of treatments for depression most commonly are based on changes in scores on symptom severity scales. This narrow symptom-focused approach towards evaluating outcome is at variance with patients' broader conceptualization of the factors deemed important in evaluating the outcome of depression treatment. In the present report we examine the factors associated with depressed patients' global ratings of improvement after a treatment intervention. Five hundred and three patients with major depressive disorder completed the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ), a self-report measure that assesses multiple constructs considered by patients to be relevant to assessing treatment outcome. The patients completed the RDQ at admission and discharge from the treatment program. At discharge, the patients made a global rating of the effectiveness of treatment. The patients significantly improved from admission to discharge on each RDQ subscale. Changes in the well-being/life satisfaction and coping subscales were the only 2 subscales that were independently associated with the patients' ratings of improvement. These results suggest that when evaluating outcome in the treatment of depression a focus on symptom improvement is too narrow. Consideration of a broader perspective in measuring outcome in treatment studies of depression is more consistent with a biopsychosocial conceptualization.

Individual treatment goals and factors influencing goal attainment in patients with somatic symptom disorder from the perspective of clinicians: A concept mapping study

OBJECTIVE

Overviews of treatment goals and influencing factors may support shared decision making and optimize customized treatment to the patient with somatic symptom disorder (SSD). The aim of this study was to identify and structure comprehensive sets of treatment goals and factors influencing goal attainment in patients with SSD from the perspective of clinicians.

METHODS

Using a concept mapping procedure, clinicians participated in interviews (N = 17) and card sorting tasks comprising 55 treatment goals and 55 factors influencing goal attainment (N = 38).

RESULTS

We identified four overarching categories (A to D) of nine clusters (1 to 9) of treatment goals: A. empowerment (A1. personal values, A2. committed action, A3. self-esteem), B. skill improvement (B4. interpersonal skills, B5. emotion and stress regulation), C. symptom reduction (C6. dysfunctional beliefs, C7. somatic symptoms, C8. psychological symptoms), and D9. active and structured lifestyle. Also, we identified four overarching categories (A to D) of nine clusters (1 to 9) of factors influencing goal attainment: A1. therapeutic alliance, B. social and everyday context (B2. [family] system, B3. meaningful daily schedule, B4. social and economic circumstances), C. ability to change (C5. externalizing tendency, C6. reflective and psychological skills, C7. perspective and motivation), and D. psychological vulnerability (D8. vulnerable personality, D9. [psychiatric] comorbidity).

CONCLUSION

The overviews of treatment goals and factors influencing goal attainment reflect different paradigmatic backgrounds of clinicians. The results can be used, in combination with the perspective of the patient, to define treatment goals, and to monitor and evaluate change in outcomes.

"Supporting Wellness": A depression and bipolar support alliance mixed-methods investigation of lived experience perspectives and priorities for mood disorder treatment

BACKGROUND

The lived experience of people with mood disorders may be leveraged to inform priorities for research, define key treatment outcomes, and support decision-making in clinical care. The aim of this mixed-methods project was to provide insight into how people with depression and bipolar disorder experience the impact of symptoms, their treatment preferences, and their definitions of wellness.

METHODS

The project was implemented in two phases. In Phase 1, community-based participatory research was used to develop a web-based survey enquiring about living with a mood disorder, treatment experiences, and wellness priorities. In Phase 2, a series of focus groups were conducted to explore aspects of wellness in greater detail.

RESULTS

Respondents (n= 6153) described the symptoms of mood disorders as having a significant, chronic impact on their lives. A holistic approach to treatment was desired by participants, but not necessarily experienced. Qualitative findings were used to further describe four highly ranked wellness priorities identified in the survey: ability to act independently or according to my own will; purpose in life; getting through the day; and contentment.

LIMITATIONS

Experience of a mood disorder was self-reported, and no formal confirmation of diagnosis occurred. Although the survey could not incorporate all possible wellness definitions, this was supplemented by qualitative focus groups.

CONCLUSION

The present findings provide important insights from the perspectives of individuals with lived experience of mood disorders. Implications of this for research and clinical practice are discussed, particularly with regards to measurement-based care and use of wellness-oriented clinical outcome assessments.

Using Socratic Questioning to promote cognitive change and achieve depressive symptom reduction: Evidence of cognitive change as a mediator

Socratic questioning has long been thought to play a critical role in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression. Though use of Socratic questioning is theorized to achieve symptom reduction by promoting cognitive change, research has yet to investigate this pathway. In a sample of 123 clients participating in CBT for depression, we tested cognitive change as a mediator of the relation between Socratic questioning and symptom change in early treatment sessions. We found evidence of a significant indirect effect, consistent with cognitive change mediating the effect of Socratic questioning on change in depressive symptoms. Further analyses showed that pre-treatment CBT skills moderated the effect of Socratic questioning on cognitive change, with this relationship being stronger for clients who started treatment with lower CBT skills. These findings provide support for the view that Socratic questioning contributes to therapeutic gains in CBT through cognitive change. This study also provides initial evidence to suggest the use of Socratic questioning is particularly important for clients who begin treatment with particularly low CBT skills.

Goal planning in mental health service delivery: A systematic integrative review

INTRODUCTION

Goal planning is routinely employed in mental health service delivery to identify priorities for treatment and support the achievement and evaluation of outcomes. Previous systematic reviews of the literature have focused on the use of goal planning in a range of physical and cognitive disability settings, but there is a lack of information regarding how goal planning is used in mental healthcare.

AIMS

This systematic integrative review aimed to understand the types of goals, effectiveness of goal planning, the experience of goal planning and barriers and facilitators to effective goal planning in mental healthcare settings.

METHODS

Five databases were systematically searched using key terms related to mental health AND goal planning. The search was supplemented through citation chaining. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis approach to data analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies were identified through the search of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines. Data was systematically extracted and thematically organized. There was a high level of heterogeneity among the studies, originating from a range of countries and with diverse characteristics and focus. Four themes emerged from the data analysis and included: (i) goal planning as a central aspect of interventions; (ii) types of goals planned; (iii) factors that influenced goal planning and/or attainment; and (iv) collaboration and concordance in goal planning.

CONCLUSION

This review found some support for the use of goal planning to improve outcomes in mental healthcare although there was no identified standardized approach to the use of goal planning. Individualized, recovery-oriented and collaborative goal planning was recommended but not always used in practice. Further research to understanding the most appropriate skills and training needed to support collaborative and effective goal planning is needed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020220595].

Using the Goal Attainment Scale adapted for depression to better understand treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder switching to vortioxetine: a phase 4, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Response to pharmacologic treatment is generally evaluated by traditional clinician- and patient-reported rating scales. Assessing therapeutic efficacy using the Goal Attainment Scale offers a complementary measure that focuses on recovery-oriented outcomes that patients consider valuable and vital to their well-being. This study aimed to examine outcomes using the Goal Attainment Scale adapted for depression (GAS-D).

METHODS

A phase 4, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study enrolled patients with MDD who were switching antidepressant medication. Patients received vortioxetine 10-20 mg over 12 weeks. Three specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound goals were collaboratively set by patients with their clinicians. One goal was determined by the patient's self-defined objectives; 2 were related to predefined domain categories. Prespecified domains included psychological, motivational, emotional, physical/functional, and cognitive categories. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a GAS-D score ≥ 50 at week 12. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included changes from baseline in several clinical and patient-reported measures of depression and cognitive function. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

At week 12, of the 122 adults participating in the study, 57.8% achieved a GAS-D score ≥ 50. Depression severity, cognitive function, cognitive performance, well-being, employment, and quality of life also significantly improved. Treatment response and remission rates were 65 and 40%, respectively. Vortioxetine was well tolerated, with adverse events consistent with product labeling.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of patients with MDD switching to vortioxetine achieved their treatment goals, including improvement in specific functional outcomes relating to physical and emotional goals, as assessed by the GAS-D and standard patient- and clinician-reported measures. When assayed for convergent validity in a separate analysis, changes in goal scores on the GAS-D were statistically significantly correlated with multiple commonly used clinical measures of depression assessed in this study. The GAS-D approach provides a new patient-centric paradigm for the collaborative development and assessment of progress toward meaningful treatment goals, contributing to a comprehensive evaluation of treatment outcomes in patients with MDD. Longer studies against a control intervention are justified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02972632 . Registered 21 November 2016.

When Are Therapists' Efforts to Bring about Cognitive Change Effective? Considering Interpersonal Vulnerabilities as Contextual Factors

We examined interpersonal variables as moderators of the relation between therapists' use of cognitive change (CC) strategies and CC in a sample of 125 adults who participated in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression. We measured self-reported maladaptive personality characteristics, interpersonal problems, and social skills at intake. Observers rated therapist adherence to cognitive methods for the first five sessions. Patients reported in-session CC following each session. Cognitive methods predicted greater CC. The relation between cognitive methods and CC was moderated by maladaptive personality traits; this relation was stronger for patients with greater maladaptive personality traits. We encourage future research investigating moderators of therapist interventions of putative therapeutic mechanisms.

Patient and Physician Perspectives of Depressive Symptoms and Expectations for Treatment Outcome: Results from a Web-Based Survey

PURPOSE

A previous international study suggested that perceptions of depression symptoms, social function, and treatment expectations are different between patients/physicians. We aimed to examine whether such differences exist in Japan.

METHODS

A web-based survey was conducted with patients who reported that they had been diagnosed with depression, and physicians who reported that they had treated patients with depression, in Japan. Questionnaires were designed to quantify patients' perceptions of symptoms, social function, and treatment expectations. Patients were categorized into three stages of disorder based on their reported current symptoms: severe symptomatic, mild symptomatic, and remission. Physicians were assigned up to three patients, were provided with patient information from the questionnaire completed by those patients, and finally the completed questionnaire forms for each patient. Agreement between the perceptions of the patients and physicians was examined for each stage.

RESULTS

Of the 2618 eligible patients, 828 were assigned to 326 eligible physicians. Overall, we found small differences in the perceptions of depression treatment between patients/physicians. Slightly fewer physicians than patients reported physical symptoms (85% vs 91%; p=0.018) in the mild symptomatic stage. Fewer physicians than patients reported cognitive symptoms in the severe (82% vs 87%; p=0.029) and mild (54% vs 66%; p=0.003) symptomatic stages. Social function was deemed to be lower by physicians than by patients, across all stages of disorder (p<0.001). Regarding treatment expectations, more physicians than patients reported "return to a normal life" in the mild symptomatic (51% vs 35%, p<0.001) and remission stages (57% vs 36%, p<0.001), and more patients than physicians reported "reduction of side effects" in the severe (10% vs 4%, p=0.004) and mild (12% vs 5%, p<0.001) symptomatic disorder stages.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest small differences in patient/physician perceptions of depression treatment in Japan. Discrepancies between patients'/physicians' perceptions may vary depending on the medical environment.

Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on relevant treatment outcomes in depression: qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Although symptomatic remission is considered the optimal outcome in depression, this is not always achieved. Furthermore, symptom indicators do not fully capture patients' and clinicians' perspectives on remission. Broader indicators of (partial) remission from depression should be considered.

AIMS

To investigate relevant outcomes of depression treatment in specialist care from patients' and clinicians' perspectives and to investigate whether these perspectives differ from each other.

METHOD

Three focus groups with 11 patients with depression and seven semi-structured interviews with clinicians were conducted exploring their perspectives on remission. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analysed the transcripts thematically using the phenomenologist approach.

RESULTS

Independently, both patients and clinicians perceived the following outcomes relevant: restoring social functioning and interpersonal relations, regaining quality of life and achieving personal goals. All clinicians emphasised symptom reduction and satisfaction with treatment as relevant outcomes, whereas the former was not an obvious theme in patients. Unlike clinicians, patients made a clear distinction between treatment outcomes in first versus recurrent/chronic depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Classically defined study outcomes based on symptom resolution only partly reflect issues considered important by patients and clinicians in specialist depression treatment. Incorporating patients' and clinicians' perspectives in the development of measurable end-points makes them more suitable for use in trials and subsequent translation to clinical practice. Furthermore, evaluating patients' perspectives on treatment outcomes helps in the development of tailored interventions according to patients' needs.

Differences in Perceptions of Major Depressive Disorder Symptoms and Treatment Priorities Between Patients and Health Care Providers Across the Acute, Post-Acute, and Remission Phases of Depression

Limited data exist on concordance between patients' and health care providers' (HCPs) perceptions regarding symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment priorities, particularly across disease phases. This study examined concordance during the acute, post-acute, and remission phases of MDD. In an online survey, 2,008 patients responded based on their experience with MDD, and 1,046 HCPs responded based on their clinical experience treating patients with MDD. Questions included symptom frequency and severity, treatment priorities, and impact on psychosocial functioning. Patients reported more frequently mood, physical, and cognitive symptoms than HCPs in the post-acute and remission phases and greater impact on psychosocial functioning. Patients reported that all these symptoms require high treatment priority across the phases of MDD, generally to a greater extent than HCPs. Patients also gave high emphasis to addressing impairment in psychosocial functioning early in the treatment course. A substantial difference in the effectiveness of treating symptoms of MDD between patients and HCPs was observed. This is the first study to quantify, broadly, differences in perceptions of MDD symptom prevalence, severity, and treatment priorities across MDD phases, and the study findings highlight a need for improved communication between patients and HCPs about symptoms, their impact on psychosocial functioning, and treatment priorities across phases.

Developing a typology of patient-generated behavioral goals for cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP): classification and predicting outcomes

Patient-generated treatment goals describe what patients value, yet the content of these goals, and the relationship among goal types, goal accomplishment, and treatment outcomes has received little examination. We used inductive sorting to categorize patient-generated goals made by 147 adults receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. The resulting goal categories were: Physical Activity (29.0%), Functional Status (24.6%), Wellness (16.3%), Recreational Activities (11.3%), House/Yard Work (9.7%), Socializing (7.1%), and Work/School (2.0%). Next, we examined associations between number of goals by category, goal accomplishment, and clinically meaningful improvements in pain-related interference, pain intensity and depressive symptoms. Improvement in all outcome domains was related to goal accomplishment. Additionally, depressive symptoms were related to number of Physical Activity, House/Yard Work, Recreational Activities, and Wellness goals, whereas improved pain-intensity was significantly related to House/Yard Work. Classifying patient-generated goals facilitates investigation of the relationships among goal type, goal accomplishment and treatment outcomes.

Effect of depression-related somatic pain on treatment satisfaction and daily living functions

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies suggest that depression is associated with somatic pain. Despite growing research interest in the topic, the effects of depression-related somatic pain remain unclear. The present study sought to investigate the relationships between depression-related somatic pain, treatment satisfaction, and functions of daily living, and to compare them with the relationships between these factors and mental health measures.

METHOD

We administered an Internet-based survey to 663 patients with depression in Japan, including questions about pain symptoms, mental health, functions of daily living, and dissatisfaction with depression treatment. The SF-8 questionnaire was used to assess functions of daily living. We conducted a multiple linear regression analysis to examine the associations between depression-related somatic pain, functions of daily living and treatment satisfaction, and between mental health measures, somatic pain and functions of daily living.

RESULTS

An increase per unit in the number of pain symptoms was associated with a 1.04-unit decrease in physical functioning score (P < 0.001), a 0.67-unit decrease in the role functioning-physical score (P < 0.001), and a 0.53-unit decrease in role functioning-emotional score (P = 0.0010). Meanwhile, we found no significant association between the number of pain symptoms and patients' satisfaction with treatment, and no significant association between the number of pain symptoms and social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that even when patients report satisfaction with their treatment, they may be suffering from reduced physical functioning and role functioning. These impairments may escape clinical recognition when clinicians or patients fail to discuss pain symptoms.

Patients' treatment expectancies in clinical trials of antidepressants versus psychotherapy for depression: a study using hypothetical vignettes

Previous research on patients' expectancies for improvement in clinical trials typically has been conducted after patients have already agreed to participate in a study. Depressed patients (n = 55) read 3 vignettes describing hypothetical clinical trials of antidepressant vs pill placebo, antidepressant vs antidepressant, and psychotherapy vs psychotherapy. Patients reported greater overall acceptability for psychotherapy over antidepressants. Patients had significantly greater expectancies for symptom reduction in either active comparator (medication or psychotherapy) compared with the placebo-controlled design. They also reported greater anticipated improvement and willingness to participate in the psychotherapy trial compared with either medication trial design. Patients' differential expectancies based on study design could lead to different patient populations being selected for these studies and influence clinical improvement.

Treatment goals of depressed outpatients: a qualitative investigation of goals identified by participants in a depression treatment trial

Treatment goals and preferences of depressed patients are important, but they are rarely empirically studied. Although clinicians are likely to discuss goals with individual patients, research that clarifies overall patterns in the treatment goals of depressed patients could be useful in informing new interventions for depression. Such research could also potentially help address problems such as poor adherence and psychotherapy drop-out. In this preliminary qualitative investigation, we examined treatment goals established by depressed outpatients in the context of a trial of behaviorally oriented psychotherapy. The treatment goals that were most commonly articulated included improving social and family relationships, increasing physical health behaviors, finding a job, and organizing one's home. These results underscore the fact that, in addition to improvement in the symptoms of depression, functional improvements are viewed as key treatment goals by depressed individuals.

Perceived barriers to mental health care and goal setting among depressed, community-dwelling older adults

OBJECTIVE

Older adults are particularly vulnerable to the deleterious effects of depression and tend to underutilize mental health services. The current study aims to characterize the perceived barriers to care and goal setting in a sample of depressed, community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

We report on the association among perceived barriers to care, goal setting and accepting a mental health referral using a subset of data from a larger study. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Forty-seven participants completed the study (Mean age = 82, SD = 7.8, 85% female). Accessing and paying for mental health treatment were the barriers most frequently cited by participants. Clinical improvement and improved socialization were most cited goals. In bivariate associations, participants who set goals (chi(2) = 5.41, p = 0.02) and reported a logistic barrier (chi(2) = 5.30, p = 0.02) were more likely to accept a mental health referral.

CONCLUSION

Perceived barriers to care and goal setting appear to be central to accepting a mental health referral among community dwelling older, depressed adults. Developing interventions that can be used to increase mental health service utilization of older adults is necessary.