Care Bundles: Increasing Consistency of Care

The impact of antenatal cluster management on maternal delivery and postpartum rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy care can improve maternal pregnancy outcomes. Cluster nursing, an evidence-based, patient-centered model, enhances pregnancy care, can provide patients with high-quality nursing services, has been widely used in clinical practice in recent years. However, most previous studies evaluated cluster nursing program only for a single clinical scenario. In this study, we developed and implemented a antenatal cluster care program for various prenatal issues faced by puerpera to analyze its application effect.

METHODS

This is a historical before and after control study. 89 expectant mothers who had their prenatal information files registered in the outpatient department of a grade III, level A hospital from June 2020 to September 2021 were finally enrolled in observation group, and received prenatal cluster management. Another set of 89 expectant mothers from January 2019 to December 2019 were included in the control group and received traditional routine prenatal management. The effect of cluster nursing management on maternal delivery and postpartum rehabilitation was evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly higher natural delivery rate, better neonatal prognosis, higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding, lower incidence of postpartum complications, shorter postpartum hospital stay, better postpartum health status, and higher satisfaction with nursing services. Compared with before intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group showed significant improvement after intervention.

CONCLUSION

Antenatal cluster care is beneficial to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, and can have positive effects on natural pregnancy and breastfeeding, while improving the multimedia health education ability of medical care and emphasizing the importance of social support.

Reducing paediatric unintended extubation: A standardized bundle approach

BACKGROUND

Unintended extubation (UE) is a serious risk associated with endotracheal intubation. In the paediatric population, UE can lead to significant patient harm. On average, each UE increases ICU and hospital length of stay by 5.5 and 6.5 days respectively and costs an additional $36 000. The international benchmark rate of UE for quality analysis cited in the literature is <1 per 100 ventilator days. The United States organization Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) developed and introduced a bundle to reduce UE with a goal of ≤0.95 per 100 ventilator days.

AIM

The aim of this quality improvement project was to determine the baseline rate of UE in a 20-bed mixed medical/surgical PICU in the Pacific Northwest of the United States, implement the SPS bundle for UE prevention, and assess adherence to the bundle, and subsequent rate of UE.

STUDY DESIGN

The IHI Model for Improvement Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) was used to guide the development, implementation, and assessment of the SPS UE Bundle standardizing the management of endotracheal tubes. Adherence to the bundle was measured through peer-to-peer audits. Rates of adherence and UE were monitored on line charts.

RESULTS

Baseline rate of UE was 1.83 per 100 ventilator days; 23 weeks post implementation of the bundle the rate of UE was reduced to 0.38 UE per 100 ventilator days, F(7, 9) = 4.685, p = 0.027. The mean bundle adherence was 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

This quality improvement initiative confirms that high adherence to the SPS UE Bundle may significantly reduce rates of UE in PICU settings.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Use of the SPS evidence-based discrete UE bundle and high adherence to the bundle can standardize practise and may reduce unintended extubation in the paediatric population.

Close the GAPS: A Standardized Perioperative Protocol Reduces Breast Reconstruction Implant Infections

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is a complex process with significant practice variability. Infections after IBBR are associated with higher rates of readmission, reoperation, and reconstructive failure. To reduce process variability and postoperative infections, the authors implemented an evidence-based, standardized protocol for IBBR.

METHODS

The protocol was applied to all patients undergoing IBBR at a single institution from December of 2019 to February of 2021. Intraoperative protocol adherence was recorded, and infection events were considered minor (managed with outpatient antibiotics) or major (managed with readmission or reoperation). A historic control group was retrospectively analyzed for comparison.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (120 breasts) in the protocol group were compared with 159 patients (269 breasts) in the retrospective group. No differences were found in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, or type of reconstruction (expander versus implant). Intraoperative protocol adherence was 80.5% (SD, 13.9%). Overall infection rate was significantly lower in the protocol group versus controls (8.7% versus 17.0%; P < 0.05). When dichotomized, protocol patients had a lower rate of both minor (2.9% versus 5.7%; P = 0.99) and major (5.8% versus 11.3%; P = 0.09) infections, although this was not statistically significant. Rate of reconstructive failure secondary to infection was significantly lower in the protocol group (4.4% versus 8.8%; P < 0.05). Among protocol patients, those without infection had higher protocol adherence (81.5% versus 72.2%; P < 0.06), which neared statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

A standardized perioperative protocol for IBBR reduces process variability and significantly decreases rate of overall infections and reconstructive failure secondary to infection.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Reducing urinary tract infection in female pelvic surgery: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare prebundle versus postbundle implementation urinary tract infection (UTI) rates among inpatients within 6 weeks of clean-contaminated pelvic reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study from September 2019 to December 2021 at a tertiary hospital. The bundle strategy included the following: universal preoperative UTI check with treatment if positive, replacing prolonged postoperative voiding trials on the ward with earlier discharge and indwelling catheter removal by a nurse continence advisor the next day, and daily cranberry extract for 6 weeks postoperatively. UTI was defined as positive urine culture (≥100 000 colony-forming unit per mL) in a symptomatic patient. Data analysis involved hypothesis testing and logistic regression.

RESULTS

The authors reviewed 132 postbundle inpatient charts and retained 93 for analyses. The results were compared with 204 prebundle inpatient charts. The rate of postoperative UTI decreased from 17.6% in the prebundle group to 6.5% after bundle implementation (P = 0.01). The adjusted odds ratio for postbundle versus prebundle likelihood of UTI was 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.98; P = 0.045). Significantly more postbundle patients compared with prebundle patients were discharged home on the first day postoperatively (76.3% vs. 37.7%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical bundle can significantly decrease both UTI rates and hospital stay after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Patient's care bundle benefits to prevent stroke associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Background

Patient's care bundle has been found to have a beneficial effect on refractory diseases, but the preventive effect of this strategy on stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) remains unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the role of the patient's care bundle in the prevention of SAP.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before January 31, 2022. The incidence of SAP and aspiration and the length of hospital stay were assessed. Random pair-wise meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also performed.

Results

Twenty eligible RCTs involving 1916 patients were included for data analysis. Pooled results suggested that patient's care bundle was associated with significantly lower incidence of SAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.29-0.46; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and aspiration (RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.35; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Meanwhile, patient's care bundle also significantly shortened the length of hospital stay for general patients (mean difference [MD], -3.10; 95% CI, -3.83 to -2.37; p < 0.001; I2 = 16%) and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay for patients with severe stoke (MD, -4.85; 95% CI, -5.86-3.84; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Results of TSA confirmed that none of the findings could be significantly reversed by future studies.

Conclusions

The patient's care bundle effectively prevents the occurrence of SAP and aspiration and shortens the hospital stay of stroke patients. However, it is necessary to design more high-quality studies to further validate our findings and investigate their applicability in other geographical regions.

Bundling Your Way to Quality Care

Background

A bundle is defined by IHI as a small set of evidence-based interventions for a defined patient segment/population and care setting that, when implemented together, will result in significantly better outcomes than when implemented individually. It is important to understand that a bundle is not simply a checklist to complete, it is a set of researched interventions that have been shown to work better when completed together. These interventions are usually already well known and utilized in practice by nurses or providers. A bundle places the priority on the entire set of interventions being completed for the at-risk patient.

Objective

The focus of this paper is to explain the principles of a bundle, the evidence supporting their utilization in practice, challenges associated with care bundles, how to overcome these challenges, and recommendations for future success.

Conclusions

A literature search on the implementation of bundles demonstrates several challenges to their use. Sustaining a comprehensive quality improvement approach within an institution can be challenging but with the guidelines outlined by IHI for requirements of a bundle and the implementation recommendations, great success can be obtained.

Effectiveness of a "Suppression Bundle" to improve HIV virologic suppression in an outpatient infectious disease clinic: a pilot implementation study

Despite effectiveness and accessibility of combined anti-retroviral therapy (cART), only 85% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in the United States are virologically suppressed. Improving suppression is complex. Our objective was to consider unique factors in PLHIV with non-suppressed viral loads in clinic and improve the percentage of suppressed patients by implementing a "Suppression Bundle" consisting of three to five bundled interventions with the goal of improved suppression. Prior to the study, there were 567 HIV-positive patients receiving care in clinic. Of those, 89 had a measurable viral load (>40 copies/mL). In this pilot pre-post implementation, we focused on the 89 non-suppressed patients to (1) determine feasibility of implementing bundles and (2) increase the number of patients with suppressed viral loads pre- to post-intervention. Of non-suppressed patients, 65 were active in care immediately pre-intervention and participated in the pilot. At the completion of the 9-month intervention, 46 had viral loads <40 copies/mL, demonstrating substantial improvement with 70.1% of the previously non-suppressed patients achieving suppression. By considering unique patient factors, an individualized Suppression Bundle is acceptable, feasible, and may increase virally suppressed patients in an outpatient clinic. Next steps include determining whether suppression bundles can be implemented in differing practices.

Application of the Care Bundle in Perioperative Nursing Care of the Type A Aortic Dissection

Background

To investigate the effect of the care bundle in the nursing care of the type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

Methods

A total of 161 patients with TAAD were included in the study. They were divided into control group (n=79) and care bundle group (n=82). The patients in the control group received routine nursing, while the patients in the care bundle group received routine nursing and care bundle. IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 levels in the three periods of T0 (before anesthesia), T1 (before anesthesia to 6 h after surgery) and T2 (6–24 h after surgery), intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, ICU stay time, intraoperative pressure ulcer rate, postoperative delirium rate, bloodstream infection rate and doctor satisfaction.

Results

The postoperative T and pH levels in two groups were all in the normal range. The levels of IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 in the care bundle group at different periods were also significantly different. The levels of IL-2 and IL-10 showed an increased trend, while that of IL-6 showed a downward trend. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery and ICU stay time, intraoperative pressure sore rate, postoperative delirium rate, and bloodstream infection rate were lower, whereas doctor satisfaction was all significantly higher in care bundle group.

Conclusion

Care bundle increased the safety of the operation, and it was beneficial to the postoperative rehabilitation for TAAD patients.

Relevance to Clinical Practice

Patients with TAAD who underwent operation need higher quality care during the entire operation. Cluster nursing is the kind of the nursing model that can better meet the requirements of the intraoperative nursing quality. The intervention methods in this study include 5 core nursing measures. These measures are implemented together in a synergistic manner to effectively improve the quality of nursing care in operating room and the health outcomes of patients with TAAD. Care bundle is worthy of clinical application.

Midwifery leaders' views on the factors considered crucial to implementing evidence-based practice in clinical areas

PROBLEM

The evidence-to-practice gap continues to persist in healthcare and midwives report limited knowledge and use of effective intervention strategies to support the implementation of new evidence-based practices in clinical settings.

BACKGROUND

Despite ongoing development and dissemination of high quality research findings, the translation of latest research evidence by midwives into new evidence-based practices remains sub-optimal. This inefficiency places consumers at risk of obsolete or potentially dangerous healthcare interventions.

AIM

To explore midwifery leaders' views on what information and support midwives require to lead practice change initiatives in clinical areas.

METHODS

The study formed part of a broader Participatory Action Research (PAR) project designed to improve the processes by which midwives implement evidence-based practice change in clinical settings. The study employed a qualitative design and was guided by the methodological underpinnings of Action Research (AR).

FINDINGS

One core finding emerged to fulfil the aim and objectives of the study. To lead implementation of evidence-based practices, midwives need practical solutions and a map of the process, packaged into a centralised web-based resource.

DISCUSSION

The findings reported in this study provide valuable insight into the specific needs of midwives wanting to improve the uptake and longevity of new evidence based practices in clinical areas. This includes information specific to evidence implementation, support networks and knowledge of Implementation Science.

CONCLUSION

To lead practice change initiatives, midwives require a web-based resource that standardises the process of evidence implementation, while providing midwives with clear direction and the support needed to confidently champion for evidence base change in clinical areas.

Impact of Bundled Care on Outcomes Following Elective Primary Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Standardized approaches to care and care pathways for patients with joint replacement have been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS), improve patient participation in education, decrease patient anxiety while improving perception of care, and lead to overall efficiency and improved care and outcomes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a standardized bundle approach to care influenced the outcomes after total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective, quasi-experimental before- and after-design study was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Two hospitals implemented a standardized bundle of care for patients undergoing THA or TKA that included preoperative patient education, day of surgery mobilization, and a total joint group physical therapy session (Full Bundle). Data analyses were completed on a convenience sample of 2,200 patients who underwent THA or TKA. Outcomes data measured were LOS, discharge disposition, costs, and readmission rate.

RESULTS

Patients receiving the Full Bundle had significant reduction in LOS of roughly 1 day (OR = 1.687, 95% CI [1.578, 1.797]) versus group not receiving all elements (OR = 2.706; 95% CI [2.623, 2.789]). Full Bundle patients were 6 times more likely to be discharged home compared with the Partial Bundle group (OR = 6.01, 95% CI [4.01, 9.03]). Full Bundle group had significantly lower total direct costs, F(1) = 4.06, p = .046, partial η = 0.003. There were no differences in readmission rates between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had all elements of the THA/TKA bundle had the best outcomes. By improving efficiencies of care through the use of the bundle, the 2 hospitals positively impacted the care and outcomes of THA and TKA patients.