Close the GAPS: A Standardized Perioperative Protocol Reduces Breast Reconstruction Implant Infections

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is a complex process with significant practice variability. Infections after IBBR are associated with higher rates of readmission, reoperation, and reconstructive failure. To reduce process variability and postoperative infections, the authors implemented an evidence-based, standardized protocol for IBBR.

METHODS

The protocol was applied to all patients undergoing IBBR at a single institution from December of 2019 to February of 2021. Intraoperative protocol adherence was recorded, and infection events were considered minor (managed with outpatient antibiotics) or major (managed with readmission or reoperation). A historic control group was retrospectively analyzed for comparison.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (120 breasts) in the protocol group were compared with 159 patients (269 breasts) in the retrospective group. No differences were found in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, or type of reconstruction (expander versus implant). Intraoperative protocol adherence was 80.5% (SD, 13.9%). Overall infection rate was significantly lower in the protocol group versus controls (8.7% versus 17.0%; P < 0.05). When dichotomized, protocol patients had a lower rate of both minor (2.9% versus 5.7%; P = 0.99) and major (5.8% versus 11.3%; P = 0.09) infections, although this was not statistically significant. Rate of reconstructive failure secondary to infection was significantly lower in the protocol group (4.4% versus 8.8%; P < 0.05). Among protocol patients, those without infection had higher protocol adherence (81.5% versus 72.2%; P < 0.06), which neared statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

A standardized perioperative protocol for IBBR reduces process variability and significantly decreases rate of overall infections and reconstructive failure secondary to infection.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in the Elderly: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Women Older Than 70 Years

BACKGROUND

Advanced age is considered by many to be a relative contraindication to breast reconstruction. However, despite increased medical comorbidities and a perception that elderly patients are less concerned with body image, more women older than 70 years are choosing to undergo breast reconstruction. There is a paucity of data to guide reconstructive decision-making and counseling in this population.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, complication rates, and long-term outcomes in women older than 70 years undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 400 patients were identified at the authors' institution and divided into 2 groups: ≥70 and <70 years old. Medical comorbidities, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes as defined by the BREAST-Q were compared using the χ2 tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables.

RESULTS

The cohort of patients older than 70 years was made up of 25 women, with a mean age of 73 years, and the cohort of patients younger than 70 years was made up of 375 women, with a mean age of 50 years. There was no significant difference in body mass index (P = 0.373), smoking status (P = 0.360), or history of prior ipsilateral radiation (P = 0.508) between the 2 cohorts; however, the elderly cohort was significantly more likely to have diabetes (P = 0.026). Although elderly patients were less likely to undergo bilateral mastectomy (P < 0.001), there was no significant difference in the type of mastectomy, pathological diagnosis, or method of reconstruction. There was no significant difference in complication rates when looking at minor infection (P = 0.553) or major infection (P = 0.553). The 2 groups were equally likely to undergo secondary procedures (P = 0.192). Overall satisfaction rates were high in all BREAST-Q categories in the elderly group and not significantly different when compared with the group of patients younger than 70 years. Matched-pair analysis showed a significant difference with the group of patients older than 70 years having higher levels physical well-being (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate breast reconstruction can be performed safely and with similar high satisfaction rates in the elderly population as their younger counterparts. Age alone should not be used as a reason for excluding women from these life-changing operations.

Skin Reducing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Complications of implant-based reconstruction have been shown to be related to increasing body mass index (BMI) and breast size. The impact of skin reducing mastectomy (SRM) with a dermal flap is examined.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience with immediate submuscular tissue expander (TE) reconstruction from 2011 to 2019 was performed. The outcomes of SRM were compared with those of skin sparing mastectomy (SSM).

RESULTS

A total of 162 patients (292 breasts) were identified. Mastectomy types were as follows: SRM, 73 (136 breasts) and SSM, 89 (156 breasts). Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was used to supplement TE coverage in 65.4% of SRM cases. Mean BMI was 29.2 among SRM patients and 25.9 in SSM patients (P < 0.001). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was more prevalent in the SRM group (SRM, 38.4% vs SSM, 22.5%; P = 0.03). Mean mastectomy weight was higher in the SRM group (SRM, 833.6 g vs SSM, 425.6 g; P < 0.001). Mean BMI and mastectomy weight were lower in SRM patients who were reconstructed with ADM (ADM, 28.1 vs no ADM, 30.8; P = 0.01; ADM, 746.1 g vs no ADM, 1006.3 g; P < 0.001). Minor complications were more prevalent in the SRM group (SRM, 22.8% vs SSM, 4.5%; P < 0.001). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) was more common in the SRM group (SRM, 22.8% vs SSM, 7.7%; P < 0.001), but MSFN necessitating operative debridement was similarly low in both groups (SRM: 1.9% vs SSM: 4.5%). Major complication rates (SRM 11.0% vs SSM 10.9%) and reconstructive failure rates (SRM 5.9% vs SSM 5.1%) were similar between groups. Mastectomy weight 800 g or higher and BMI of 30 or higher were found to be risk factors for complications on analysis of the SRM cohort (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy weight and BMI were positive predictors of complications after immediate TE reconstruction. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis is more common after SRM than SSM. The use of SRM with a dermal flap has a similar major complication rate as SSM despite its use in obese, large-breasted women. The dermal flap provides soft tissue coverage, which prevents implant exposure and seroma. The use of ADM does not adversely affect the complication rate of SRM.

A Simplified Approach to Myelomeningocele Defect Repair

BACKGROUND

Repair of the soft tissue defect in myelomeningoceles remains challenging. The literature currently lacks a systematic approach, reporting high rates of complications. We present outcomes from the largest series to date and describe a simplified approach that minimizes morbidity and streamlines decision making.

METHODS

Patients 1 year or younger who underwent myelomeningocele repair between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Flap types were categorized by tissue composition. Complications were dichotomized into early and late (<30 days and >30 days postoperative, respectively). Logistic regression was used to measure the impact of flap tissue composition and skin closure technique on odds of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Reoperation was required in only 3 (3.0%) patients-1 for wound dehiscence and 2 for surgical site infections. Zero cases of tethered cord or cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred. The most common minor complications were early wound complications (n = 18, 18.6%) and early infection (n = 5, 5.2%). Fascia-only flaps and muscle + other tissue flaps were not associated with higher odds of complications compared with muscle-only flaps (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-8.50, P = 0.29; OR = 2.87, 95% CI 0.66-12.51, P = 0.16, respectively). Rhomboid flaps for skin closure were associated with higher odds of complications (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.00-19.97; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach to myelomeningocele repair demonstrated no cases of secondary tethered cord or cerebrospinal fluid leak, and reoperative rates were extremely low. Because complications were unrelated to flap type, we recommend a simplified approach using any tissue type for dural coverage and 2-layer primary closure of the skin.

Location and Causation of Residual Lymph Node Metastasis After Surgical Treatment of Regionally Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

After initial surgical treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) residual lymph node metastases are often found at the time of radioactive iodine (¹³¹I) therapy. Recurrence of DTC is due to persistent disease not removed at initial surgery which also did not respond to ¹³¹I treatment. This study aimed at determining locations of, and reasons for, residual nodal metastases detected by ¹³¹I scans with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) obtained prior to radioiodine therapy following surgical treatment of DTC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 352 patients with intermediate and high-risk DTC treated with ¹³¹I therapy at the University of Michigan from 2007 to 2014. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy with or without lymph node dissection followed by radioiodine therapy. Pre-ablation diagnostic ¹³¹I scans with SPECT/CT were used postoperatively to localize nodal metastases, which were then compared with the cervical lymph node basins dissected at the time of surgery to determine the reason for residual nodal metastases: incomplete nodal dissection versus preoperative unrecognized nodal metastases.

RESULTS

Of the 352 patients in the study, 146 (41.5%) had residual nodal metastases detected on ¹³¹I scans with SPECT/CT following initial surgery but prior to ¹³¹I therapy. Among the 146 patients with residual disease, there were a total of 218 distinct nodal metastases. Relative to the primary tumor, 71.6% (n = 156) of metastases were ipsilateral, 22.0% (n = 48) were contralateral, and 6.4% (n = 14) were non-sided in the central neck (level VI/VII). Cervical lymph node levels VI, III, and II had the greatest frequencies of residual metastases (33.9%, 22.9%, 18.8%, respectively). Residual metastases occurred because of incomplete nodal dissection (49.3%), lack of preoperative identification (37.7%), or a combination of both (13%).

CONCLUSION

Residual nodal metastasis following initial surgical treatment for regionally advanced differentiated thyroid cancer is rather common on highly sensitive ¹³¹I scans with SPECT/CT and is due to both unrecognized nodal involvement preoperatively and incomplete removal of metastatic lymph nodes during compartment-orientated nodal dissection. The surgical management of high-risk DTC should include preoperative imaging to evaluate for nodal metastases in the central and lateral neck and compartment-orientated nodal dissection of involved compartments. Attention should be given to complete dissection in levels VI, III, and II, particularly when dissecting compartments ipsilateral to the primary tumor.