Assessment of Postural Muscle Strength in Sitting: Reliability of Measures Obtained with Hand-Held Dynamometry in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Effectiveness of Activity-Based Therapy for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury in Promoting Static and Dynamic Sitting Balance: Is Olfactory Mucosa Autograft a Factor?

Background

Activity-based therapy (ABT) appears to improve outcomes for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, few studies have examined sitting static and dynamic balance. It was unknown whether individuals after SCI who elected to undergo an olfactory mucosa autograft (OMA) would respond differently to ABT.

Objectives

The first objective was to assess changes in sitting strength (static) and dynamic balance in a group of individuals with SCI undergoing intensive ABT. The second objective was to determine whether sitting balance changes would be different for those who had participated in ABT after the OMA versus those who had ABT alone.

Methods

A handheld dynamometer measured peak force (sitting strength) and the multi-directional reach test measured dynamic balance (n = 16).

Results

ABT (average dose: 7 hours per week over 4.6 months) appeared to promote improvements in sitting strength in four directions (0.6-0.8 kg per month) and dynamic balance in four of five directions (0.7-1.3 cm per month). Individuals who had undergone an OMA had similar, but not greater, improvements in static and dynamic balance when compared with those who had ABT alone. It is unknown whether balance improvements resulted from natural or other factors.

Conclusion

ABT may have contributed to balance changes in individuals with SCI. Although small improvements in sitting static and dynamic balance did occur, future research documenting therapy intervention details and ABT dose-response in larger groups of individuals with SCI must be performed to provide guidance as to the optimal, effective ABT dose required to generate clinically meaningful functional improvements.

Neurorehabilitation using a voluntary driven exoskeletal robot improves trunk function in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: a single-arm study

Body weight-supported treadmill training with the voluntary driven exoskeleton (VDE-BWSTT) has been shown to improve the gait function of patients with chronic spinal cord injury. However, little is known whether VDE-BWSTT can effectively improve the trunk function of patients with chronic spinal cord injury. In this open-label, single-arm study, nine patients with chronic spinal cord injury at the cervical or thoracic level (six males and three females, aged 37.8 ± 15.6 years, and time since injury 51.1 ± 31.8 months) who underwent outpatient VDE-BWSTT training program at Keio University Hospital, Japan from September 2017 to March 2019 were included. All patients underwent twenty 60-minute gait training sessions using VDE. Trunk muscular strength, i.e., the maximum force against which patient could maintain a sitting posture without any support, was evaluated in four directions: anterior, posterior, and lateral (right and left) after 10 and 20 training sessions. After intervention, lateral muscular strength significantly improved. In addition, a significant positive correlation was detected between the change in lateral trunk muscular strength after 20 training sessions relative to baseline and gait speed. The change in trunk muscular strength after 20 training sessions relative to baseline was greatly correlated with patient age. This suggests that older adult patients with chronic spinal cord injury achieved a greater improvement in trunk muscle strength following VDE-BWSTT. All these findings suggest that VDE-BWSTT can improve the trunk function of patients with chronic spinal cord injury and the effect might be greater in older adult patients. The study was approved by the Keio University of Medicine Ethics Committee (IRB No. 20150355-3) on September 26, 2017.

Community exercise for individuals with spinal cord injury with inspiratory muscle training: A pilot study

Context/Objective: Respiratory disorders are a common cause of rehospitalization, and premature death in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). Respiratory training combined with community exercise programs may be a method to reduce secondary complications in this population.Objective: The present study explores the inclusion of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in an existing community exercise program.Design: Case series.Setting: Community.Participants: Participants (N = 6) completed the exercise program. Five were male and one was female; four reported incomplete injuries, and two reported complete injuries; four had cervical injuries, and two had thoracic injuries. The average age was 33 years (SD = 18.6) and time since injury was 7 years (SD = 4.0).Interventions: Participants completed an 8-week program, once-per-week for 4 h that included a circuit of resistance training, aerobic exercise, trunk stability, and education. IMT was completed as a home exercise program.Outcome Measures: Transfer test, T-shirt test, four-directional reach, four-directional trunk strength, weekly training diaries, and a subjective interview.Results: Twenty-eight training logs were collected. All measures improved: transfer test (mean = -14.62, SD = 7.00 s), T-shirt test (mean = -7.83, SD = 13.88 s), four-directional reach (mean = 3.75, SD = 8.06 in) and hand-held dynamometer (mean = 6.73, SD = 8.02 kg). Individuals reported a positive impact of the program.Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated community exercise with IMT use may have positive impact on functional measures for people with SCI who are vulnerable to respiratory compromise. Continued education may increase successful health outcomes.Trial Registration: NCT03743077.

A Framework for Movement Analysis of Tasks: Recommendations From the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy's Movement System Task Force

The American Physical Therapy Association's Vision Statement of 2013 asserts that physical therapists optimize movement in order to improve the human experience. In accordance with this vision, physical therapists strive to be recognized as experts in movement analysis. However, there continues to be no accepted method to conduct movement analysis, nor an agreement of key terminology to describe movement observations. As a result, the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy organized a task force that was charged with advancing the state of practice with respect to these issues, including the development of a proposed method for movement analysis of tasks. This paper presents the work of the Task Force, which includes (1) development of a method for conducting movement analysis within the context of the movement continuum during 6 core tasks (sitting, sit to stand, standing, walking, step up/down, and reach/grasp/manipulate); (2) glossary of movement constructs that can provide a common language for movement analysis across a range of tasks: symmetry, speed, amplitude, alignment, verticality, stability, smoothness, sequencing, timing, accuracy, and symptom provocation; and (3) recommendations for task and environmental variations that can be systematically applied. The expectation is that this systematic framework and accompanying terminology will be easily adapted to additional patient or client-specific tasks, contribute to development of movement system diagnostic labels, and ultimately improve consistency across patient/client examination, evaluation, and intervention for the physical therapy profession. Next steps should include validation of this framework across patient/client groups and settings.

Effectiveness of Combined Stretching and Strengthening Exercise Using Rehabilitation Exercise System with a Linear Actuator and MR Damper on Static and Dynamic Sitting Postural Balance: A Feasibility Study

Postural imbalance induced by prolonged sitting can be improved by exercise therapy. The aim of study was to evaluate the influence of combined stretching and strengthening exercise using rehabilitation exercise system with a linear actuator and MR damper on static and dynamic sitting postural balance. Twelve subjects who sit almost 10 h a day participated in this study. The rehabilitation exercise system with a linear actuator and MR damper was manufactured to provide stretching and strengthening exercise. All subjects were asked to perform an exercise program that was designed to enhance postural balance by stretching the tight muscle and strengthening the weakened muscle. Body pressure distributions were analyzed for mean force and mean pressure using a seat sensor system. Trunk muscle activities were measured by attaching surface electrodes to the thoracic erector spinae, lumbar erector spinae, and lumbar multifidus muscle. All data were divided into two regions (dominant and non-dominant side) under four conditions: no pelvic tilt, lateral pelvic tilt, anterior pelvic tilt, and posterior pelvic tilt. Body pressure distributions and trunk muscle activities were compared between before and after performing exercise under static and dynamic sitting conditions. Both in static and dynamic sitting conditions, there were significant differences in body pressure distributions and trunk muscle activities between the DS and NDS before performing the exercise (p < 0.01). After performing exercise, the body pressure distributions increased on the dominant side while those decreased on the non-dominant side significantly (p < 0.01). In addition, the activities of all trunk muscles on the non-predominant side increased significantly (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). These results showed that postural balance was improved by decreasing the differences in body pressure distribution and trunk muscle activity between the dominant and non-dominant side after performing exercise. From the results of this study, we concluded that the rehabilitation exercise system with a linear actuator and MR damper is suitable for providing combined stretching and strengthening exercise, and it could be helpful to maintain correct posture by enhancing postural balance during sitting.

Establishing the reliability of instrumented trunk impairment assessment methods to enable evidence-based classification in Para swimming

This study examined the reliability of instrumented trunk assessment methods across two experiments to develop and improve evidence-based classification in Para swimming. Trunk coordination, range of motion (ROM), and strength were assessed in 38 non-disabled participants. Each test battery was completed on two occasions to determine inter-session reliability. Intra-session reliability was also determined in Experiment Two. Absolute agreement of two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,1) was calculated to assess reliability. Standard errors of measurement (SEMs) were also reported to facilitate comparisons between different outcomes. Trunk coordination measures had low-to-moderate reliability (inter-session ICCs = 0.00-0.60; intra-session ICCs = 0.14-0.65) and variable SEMs (5-60%). Trunk ROM demonstrated moderate-to-excellent reliability (inter-session ICCs = 0.61-0.93; intra-session ICCs = 0.87-0.95) and good SEMs (<10%). Trunk strength measures demonstrated good-to-excellent reliability (ICCs = 0.87-0.98) and good SEMs (<10%). The strength values obtained for the load cell and hand-held dynamometer (HHD) were significantly different from each other with the HHD underestimating strength. Modifications provided in Experiment Two improved the reliability of strength and ROM assessments but did not improve coordination measures. Further research involving para swimmers is required to establish the validity of the methods.

The Effect of Virtual Reality Exercise Program on Sitting Balance Ability of Spinal Cord Injury Patients

(1) Background: Virtual reality (VR) is a useful device for rehabilitation therapy. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of virtual reality exercise program on sitting balance with spinal cord injury; (2) Methods: 20 subjects who selected on the basis of the screening criteria were divided into the experimental group (n = 10) who underwent the virtual reality exercise program and rehabilitation therapy and the control group (n = 10) who underwent a regular sitting balance training program and a regular rehabilitation therapy. Each intervention consisted of a 30-min session a day, three times a week, for eight weeks. In order to measure functions of the sitting balance, FSA (force sensitive application) and LOS (limit of stability) were used before and after the treatment intervention; (3) Results: We found significant differences for the FSA, LOS between pre-test and post-test in the 2 groups; (4) Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that virtual reality exercise program can be applied as a useful approach for spinal cord injury patients.

A systematic review of adults` sitting balance assessments in neurological and neuromuscular condition

Objectives:

To find out new assessment tools for sitting, in patients with neurological and neuromuscular conditions, to be recommended for rehabilitation practice locally in Saudi Arabia and internationally.

Methods:

Four databases were used: PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were articles published between the years 2009–2019; sitting, not standing or walking; assessment not intervention; published in English and studies on adults only. Exclusion criteria were any assessment that measures the standing/walking ability or has items for that, and studies that include pediatric or adolescent or both.

Results:

Ten articles met our criteria including 464 patients and divided into 3 main neurological conditions (stroke, SCI, and MS). One assessment (Function in Sitting Test) showed promising potential being implemented with both stroke and multiple sclerosis, Cronbach’s alpha, α were 0.91 and 0.98 indicating high internal consistency. It was used with SCI patients, however, no access was available to include this study in this review.

Conclusion:

This review indicates an extension of what was carried out by previous systematic reviews with neurological conditions. It seems that Function in Sitting Test is the most frequent assessment in this review with multiple neurological conditions (stroke, MS and SCI) with high internal consistency and high quality studies according to available data. However, this review showed that there is an absence of evidence for individuals with brain injury. Further work needs to be carried out to address such groups of patients to extend the choices that clinicians can use in rehabilitation sittings.

Psychometric Testing and Clinical Utility of a Modified Version of the Function in Sitting Test for Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVES

Seated balance (SB) is substantially compromised and greatly impacts the function of individuals living with a spinal cord injury (SCI). A clinically applicable criterion standard measure for SB does not exist for this population. Initial validation and reliability analysis of the Function in Sitting Test (FIST) in SCI has been published, but the authors of this study report that modifications to the tool may be necessary. This study aimed to explore the psychometrics and clinical utility of a modified version of the FIST to better measure SCI-specific functional tasks in sitting.

DESIGN

The FIST was modified (FIST-SCI) by an expert panel and used by 2 graders to evaluate the SB of individuals with chronic SCI (cSCI) on 2 separate days. The Motor Assessment Scale item 3 (MAS-SCI) was included as a comparison measure.

SETTING

Research facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with cSCI longer than 1 year (N=38) participated in the study. Injury levels of individuals participating in this study spanned C1 to T10 (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A, 17 subjects; B, 12 subjects; and C, 9 subjects). Thirteen individuals required assistance to transfer.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Validity, reliability, internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

Validity testing found a moderate relationship between the MAS-SCI and the FIST-SCI (ρ, .522; P<.05). FIST-SCI scores distinguished individuals requiring assistance to transfer from those who were independent (t=4.51; P<.05). Inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient (2,k)=.985 and .983, respectively) and internal consistency was excellent (α=.94). A FIST-SCI cutoff score of 45 or greater was 92% sensitive and specific in characterizing transfer ability. Standard error of the measure (1.3) and minimal detectable change (3.5) were similar to previous work.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial validity of the FIST-SCI is reported, but further assessment is required. Reliability is excellent in the cSCI population. FIST-SCI scores provide clinical insight into the seated functional ability of individuals with cSCI.

Intra-rater reliability of hip abductor isometric strength testing in a standing position in older fallers and non-fallers

Background

Reduced hip muscle strength has been shown to be a major factor related to falls in older persons. However, comprehensive assessment of hip abduction strength in the clinical setting is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and intra-rater reliability of a quick and simple hip abductor strength test in a functional standing position.

Methods

Individuals over 65 years of age were recruited from the geriatric department of a university hospital and an outpatient clinic. Thirty-two older subjects, including 16 fallers (≥1 fall during the last 12 months) and 16 non-fallers were included. Maximum voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) and rate of force generation (RFG) of the hip abductors of the right leg were evaluated in a standing position using a hand-held dynamometer. Two test-sessions were carried out. All hip strength values were normalized to participants’ weight. Reliability was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient agreement (ICC_agreement), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and a Bland and Altman analysis (BA).

Results

All participants completed the strength tests, which took a mean 2.47 ± 0.49 min (one limb). Intra-rater reliability was higher for MVIS (0.98_{[0.95–0.99]}) than RFG (ICC = 0.93_{[0.87–0.97]}) for the entire sample. In the non-fallers, ICC was 0.98_{[0.95–1.00]} (SEM = 0.08 N.kg^− 1) for MVIS and 0.88_{[0.75–0.96]} for RFG (SEM = 1.34 N.kg^-1.s^-1). In the fallers, ICC was 0.94_{[0.89–0.98]} (SEM = 0.11 N.kg^− 1) for MVIS and 0.93_{[0.84–0.98]} (SEM = 1.12 N.kg^− 1.s^− 1) for RFG. The BA plot showed that the MVIS and RFG values did not differ across test-sessions, showing that no learning effect occurred (no systematic effect). The mean differences between test-sessions were larger and the LOA smaller in the fallers than in the non-fallers.

Conclusion

Assessment of hip strength in a standing position is feasible, rapid and reliable. We therefore recommend this position for clinical practice. Future studies should investigate the diagnostic value of hip abductor strength in standing to discriminate between fallers and non-fallers, and to determine if change in strength following a falls prevention program reduces the risk of falls.

Clinical Instruments for Measuring Unsupported Sitting Balance in Subjects with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Background: Evidence of intervention effectiveness depends on, among other things, the use of a common set of valid and reliable measures that are responsive to change and reflect clinically important outcomes. Objective: To identify clinical assessment instruments with properties for measuring unsupported sitting balance in subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, and Central) were searched for articles with the key words "spinal cord injury," "unsupported sitting," and "outcome assessment" in combination with a specific methodological search filter for each database. Studies describing the application of any assessment instrument for measuring unsupported sitting balance in subjects with SCI, which had the evaluation of any measurement property, were included in the review. Publication details, measure's name, setting, summary statistics, measurement properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness), and statistical significance (p values) were extracted. Results: Eight hundred forty publications were identified; 8 articles were included in the systematic review. Twelve instruments were identified and analyzed, showing limited and incomplete measurement properties. Among them, 10 addressed activity, 1 addressed structures/body functions, and 1 addressed both activity and structures/body functions domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Conclusion: Based mainly on the measurement properties and the development of the instruments analyzed in this review, the Sitting Balance Measure, the Trunk Control Test, and the Set of Assessment Tools for Measuring Unsupported Sitting seem to be the most appropriate and recommended measures to assess unsupported sitting in subjects with SCI.

Falls Among Wheelchair and Scooter Users with Multiple Sclerosis—A Review

Falls are increasingly recognized as a threat to the safety, health and well-being of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), and emerging evidence suggests that full time wheelchair and scooter users with MS have unique fall prevention needs. This review is comprised of three parts. Part 1 summarizes findings describing influences on falls among full time wheelchair and scooter users with MS and associated clinical implications. Although further studies are needed, early findings regarding influences on fall risk operating in this specific population highlight the importance of addressing falls that occur during activities of daily living, the high frequency of falls occurring in the bathroom, and both extrinsic (e.g., wet/slippery surfaces) and intrinsic (e.g., muscle spasticity/weakness) contributors to falls. Part 2 of this review describes available evidence regarding interventions to prevent falls in full time wheelchair and scooter users with MS. Because intervention work in this area is limited to one pilot study, Part 3 presents priorities for future research and identifies the need for randomized trials evaluating fall prevention programs that address diverse fall risk factors and allow for development and attainment of individualized fall prevention goals.

EVALUATION OF MUSCLE STRENGTH IN MEDULLAR INJURY: A LITERATURE REVIEW

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the tools used to evaluate muscle strength in subjects with spinal cord injury in both clinical practice and scientific research. Methods: Initially, the literature review was carried out to identify the tools used in scientific research. The search was conducted in the following databases: Virtual Health Library (VHL), Pedro, and PubMed. Studies published between 1990 and 2016 were considered and selected, depicting an evaluation of muscle strength as an endpoint or for characterization of the sample. Next, a survey was carried out with physiotherapists to identify the instruments used for evaluation in clinical practice, and the degree of satisfaction of professionals with respect to them. Results: 495 studies were found; 93 were included for qualitative evaluation. In the studies, we verified the use of manual muscle test with different graduation systems, isokinetic dynamometer, hand-held dynamometer, and manual dynamometer. In clinical practice, the manual muscle test using the motor score recommended by the American Spinal Cord Injury Association was the most used method, despite the limitations highlighted by the physiotherapists interviewed. Conclusion: In scientific research, there is great variation in the methods and tools used to evaluate muscle strength in individuals with spinal cord injury, differently from clinical practice. The tools available and currently used have important limitations, which were highlighted by the professionals interviewed. No instrument depicts direct relationship of muscle strength and functionality of the subject. There is no consensus as to the best method for assessing muscle strength in spinal cord injury, and new instruments are needed that are specific for use in this population.

Trunk Function and Ischial Pressure Offloading in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a relationship between trunk function and offloading of the ischial tuberosities in individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional evaluation.

SETTING

Sub-acute rehabilitation hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen non-ambulatory participants with complete or incomplete traumatic and non-traumatic SCI, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), Classification A-D.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Isometric trunk strength using a hand held dynamometer, the ability to reach using the multidirectional reach test and offloading times of the ischial tuberosities using a customized pressure mat.

RESULTS

Participants who were able to engage in the multidirectional reach test were defined as "Reachers", whereas individuals who were unable to engage in the multidirectional reach test were defined as "Non-Reachers". Trunk strength was significantly higher in Reachers compared with Non-Reachers (P < 0.05). Offloading times over the left and right ischial tuberosities were lower in Non-Reachers when compared with Reachers, however the results were statistically significant only for offloading over the right ischial tuberosity (P < 0.05). There was no correlation between trunk strength and pressure offloading times for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of an individual's ability to engage in a reaching task, participants with spinal cord injury spent more time offloading the left ischial tuberosity compared with the right ischial tuberosity. The study highlights the need to identify factors that may contribute to offloading behavior in individuals with spinal cord injury who lack sufficient trunk strength.

Psychometric Properties of a Clinical Strength Assessment Protocol in People with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Strength training in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important component of rehabilitation, but it can be challenging for clinicians to quantify strength accurately and reliably. This study investigated the psychometric properties of a clinical strength assessment protocol using handheld dynamometry and other objective, quantifiable tests for the lower extremities and trunk in people with MS.

METHODS

This study determined discriminant validity between 25 participants with MS and 25 controls and between participants with MS who had higher versus lower disability; test-retest reliability across 7 to 10 days; and response stability. The protocol included handheld dynamometry measurements of ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion and extension; hip flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction; and trunk lateral flexion. Muscular endurance tests were used to measure trunk extension, trunk flexion, and ankle plantarflexion.

RESULTS

The protocol discriminated between participants with MS and controls for all muscles tested (P < .001-.003). The protocol also discriminated between low- and moderate-disability groups (P = .001-.046) for 80% of the muscles tested. Test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficients were high (0.81-0.97). Minimal detectable change as a percentage of the mean was 13% to 36% for 85% of muscles tested.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and response stability of a strength assessment protocol in people with MS. This protocol may be useful for tracking outcomes in people with MS for clinical investigations and practice.

Trunk strength and function using the multidirectional reach distance in individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord injury

CONTEXT

Trunk control is essential to engage in activities of daily living. Measuring trunk strength and function in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) is difficult. Trunk function has not been studied in non-traumatic SCI (NTSCI).

OBJECTIVES

To characterize changes in trunk strength and seated functional reach in individuals with NTSCI during inpatient rehabilitation. To determine if trunk strength and seated reach differ between walkers and wheelchair users. To explore relationships between trunk and hip strength and seated functional reach.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Two SCI rehabilitation facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

32 subacute inpatients (mean age 48.0 ± 15.4 years).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Isometric strength of trunk and hip and function (Multidirectional Reach Test: MDRT) were assessed at admission and within 2 weeks of discharge. Analysis of variance was conducted for admission measures (MDRT, hip and trunk strength) between walkers and wheelchair users. Changes in MDRT, hip and trunk strength were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric statistics. The level of association between changes in values of MRDT and strength was also examined.

RESULTS

Significant differences between walkers and wheelchair users were found for strength measures (P < 0.05) but not for MDRT. Left- and right-sided reaches increased in wheelchair users only (P < 0.05). Associations between changes in hip strength, trunk strength, and reach distance were found (R = 0.67-0.73).

CONCLUSION

In clinical settings, it is feasible and relevant to assess trunk, hip strength, and MRDT. Future studies require strategies to increase the number of participants assessed, in order to inform clinicians about relevant rehabilitation interventions.

A systematic review of dynamometry and its role in hand trauma assessment

The dynamometer was developed by American neurologists and came into general use in the late 19th century. It is still used in various ways as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical settings. In this systematic review we assessed in detail the different uses of dynamometry, its reliability, different dynamometers used and the influence of rater experience by bringing together and evaluating all published literature in this field. It was found that dynamometry is applied in a wide range of medical conditions. Furthermore, the great majority of studies reported acceptable to high reliability of dynamometry. Jamar mechanical dynamometer was used most often in the studies reviewed. There were mixed results concerning the effect of rater experience. The factors influencing the results of dynamometry were identified as age, gender, body weight, grip strength, BMI, non/dominant hand, assessing upper/lower limbs, rater and patient’s strength and the distance from the joint where the dynamometer is placed. This review provides an understanding of the relevance and significance of dynamometry which should serve as a starting point to guide its use in hand trauma assessment. On the basis of our findings, we suggest that hand dynamometry has a great potential, and could be used more often in clinical practice.