Long-term outcomes after operative treatment for tibial pilon fractures

The Metal in My Body: Patients' Perception and Attitude Toward Orthopedic Implants

INTRODUCTION

Metal implants are broadly used in orthopedics and traumatology to stabilize bone fragments. This study aimed to explore patients' awareness, body image, and overall experience of living with a metal implant after a fracture.

METHODS

A mixed methods convergent design (QUAN+QUAL) was adopted. A self-reported 30-item questionnaire was used to investigate patients' perception and apprehension of the implantation of orthopedic materials. To enlighten the quantitative findings, semi-structured interviews followed till data saturation. Quantitative and qualitative data were compared during the analysis phase.

RESULTS

Results showed that women's and elders' acceptance of the implants was greater than that of men and younger patients even in acute cases. The sense of superiority provided by the implant was mainly reported by the elderly (adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) for increasing age: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.1; p<0.01), and the sense of inferiority was mainly reported by young men (ORadj: 6.19; 95% CI: 2.36-16.22; p<0.01). Similarly, women and elderly mostly tended to answer that the injured limb felt stronger after the implant placement, while young men tended to answer a sense of weakness with the implant (ORadj for increasing age: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09; ORadj for male gender: 4.67; 95% CI: 1.87-11.7; p<0.01 for both regressions). Most participants (56.6%) and mainly young participants, regardless of gender, expressed the desire to get the metal implants removed (ORadj for increasing age: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.89-0.95; p<0.01). Misinformation and misconception were also found in a high percentage of the questioned patients (48.1%). Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed that none of the participants directly attributed any change in their life, self, or body image to the implants. An altered body image was not reported. The most reported experience was the restriction of movement due to the accident or the subsequent physical weakness.

CONCLUSION

Despite the acceptance of the implant being great, the level of patient knowledge was fairly low. The present study highlights the importance of providing patients with information throughout their management to avoid misunderstandings. Age and gender did influence patients' perception of the implants. Personalized assessment is further needed to address body image issues after an implant placement procedure.

Tibialis posterior tendon entrapment in posterior malleolar and pilon injuries of the ankle: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The Tibialis Posterior tendon (TPT) is the only tendon to encounter the distal tibia and is therefore at greatest risk of injury in fractures of the distal tibia. Although TPT injury has been reported rarely with injuries around the ankle, they often have been missed and present late.

AIM

Our aim was to analyse the rate to TPT entrapment in fractures involving the posterior tibia, i.e. Pilon (PLM) and posterior malleolar fractures (PMF).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of PMF and Pilon fractures over an 8-year period was undertaken. Patients who had undergone surgical fixation of their PMF or PLM were identified from 2014 to 2022, using our prospectively collected database. Any fracture which had undergone a preoperative CT was included. Analysis of their pre-operative CT imaging was utilised to identify TPT entrapment, where if < 50% of the tendon cross section was present in the fracture site, this was denoted as a minor entrapment and if ≥ 50% of the tendon was present in the fracture site was denoted as major.

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients were identified for further analysis, 220 who had a PMF and 143 with PLM injury. The incidence of TPT entrapment was 22% (n = 79) with 64 minor and 15 major entrapments. If the fracture line entered the TPT sheath, there was a 45% rate (72/172) of entrapment as compared to 3.7% (7/190) in fractures not entering the sheath (p < .001). There was no significant difference in TPT entrapment in PMF as compared to PML (p = 0.353).

CONCLUSION

In our assessment, we found significant prevalence of 22% of TPT entrapment in fractures involving the posterior tibia. PMF and PLF had no statistically significant difference in the rate of TPT entrapment. Additionally, we found that there was a significant risk of TPT entrapment when the CT images display the fracture line entering the tendon sheath. We recommend that surgeons consider taking care assessing pre-operative imaging to seek to identify the TPT and to assess intraoperatively where entrapment does occur.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Open Broström-Gould Procedure: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Background

Ankle sprains are a common musculoskeletal injury among the general population and often involve the lateral ligament complex. Although the majority of ankle sprains are treated successfully with nonsurgical conservative measures, an estimated 5% to 20% of ankle injuries ultimately develop chronic lateral ankle instability (CAI). Multiple surgical treatment modalities for the lateral ankle complex exist, such as anatomical and nonanatomical reconstruction. The current gold standard for primary surgical repair is the Broström-Gould procedure. This is the first article to provide PROMIS scores following BG and the largest study with 5-year outcomes for an open BG.

Methods

This was a descriptive study of a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing a BG with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Patient-reported outcome instruments collected postoperatively were PROMIS Pain, Physical Function, Depression, and FAAM. Further preoperative clinic characteristics were analyzed to correlate with the final outcome. The electronic medical record was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27698 (Broström-Gould) from January 2010 to June 2017. Surveys were conducted in the clinic and through phone interviews. Patient charts were reviewed to obtain basic patient demographic information including sex, age, race, and body mass index (BMI). The following preoperative variables were recorded: history of prior CAI procedures, history of major trauma, duration of symptoms, number of diagnosed ankle sprains, other collagen pathologies, generalized ligament laxity, participation in sports/activity level, peroneal subluxation, clinically diagnosed peroneus longus or brevis tendinopathy, deltoid ligament injury, anterior ankle impingement, and posterior ankle impingement. The PROMIS and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores were obtained with a combination of clinic and phone interviews. Data were aggregated in Microsoft Excel and entered in R (version 4.2.0) for statistical analysis.

Results

Our results show that the minimum 5-year patient-reported PROMIS scores for patients following a Broström-Gould procedure are as follows: PROMIS physical function, 50.5; PROMIS pain interference, 48.2; and PROMIS depression, 38.2. This indicates, at a minimum, that patients 5 years removed from the procedure are within 1 SD of the general population in regard to PROMIS physical function and pain. Our patient-reported FAAM, activities of daily living, and FAAM sports scores were 59.6 and 13.0 respectively. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were recorded. Arthroscopic examination was performed before lateral ligaments reconstruction for patients with intra-articular pathologies confirmed on MRI.

Conclusion

The findings from our study offer evidence supporting the effectiveness of the Broström-Gould procedure to be associated with normal physical function, even 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, our research identified specific factors such as tobacco use, diabetes, and sports participation that independently correlated with reported outcome measures. These insights enable physicians to better manage patient expectations and tailor treatment strategies accordingly. Our study establishes a foundation for future prospective research endeavors that aim to leverage the PROMIS system for comprehensive outcome assessments.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of complications and reoperations in AO/OTA 43.C3 pilon fractures treated with conventional ORIF versus minimally invasive hexapod ring fixation

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of AO/OTA 43. C3 pilon fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the gold standard treatment, but serious soft tissue and infectious complications have been previously reported. Minimally invasive strategies using hexapod ring fixation (HRF) with supplemental limited internal fixation have been used to reduce the incidence of complications. Previous studies have included heterogeneous types of pilon fractures, with non-comminuted injuries being more likely to be treated with ORIF and complex fractures receiving HRF treatment. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the complications and reoperation rates between ORIF and HRF exclusively for C3 fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective study comparing 53 patients treated for AO/OTA 43.C3 pilon fracture with ORIF or HRF in a trauma level I center with at least a two-year follow-up. Patients treated between January 2015 and January 2019 received ORIF and those treated between January 2019 and January 2021 received HRF. Complications were divided into two groups: minor (superficial infection and malalignment) and major (non-union, deep infection, and amputation). Reoperations, prevalence of ankle osteoarthritis, and requirement for ankle arthrodesis/total ankle replacement were registered.

RESULTS

We included 30 and 23 patients in the ORIF and HRF groups, respectively. The overall complication rate was similar in both groups, with 50% and 56,5% of the patients having complications in the ORIF and HRF groups, respectively (p:0,63). Minor complications were significantly more prevalent in the HRF group (p<0,001) whilst the ORIF group had a significantly higher rate of major complications (p<0,01). Superficial infections were highly prevalent in the HRF group (47,8%), as they were related to half-pin or K-wire infections. Deep infection was present only in the ORIF group, with 20% of the patients developing this major complication (p:0,03). Non-union rate, reoperations, ankle osteoarthritis, and the need for arthrodesis or ankle replacement showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

In AO/OTA 43.C3 fractures, HRF is safe and effective, achieving high union rates with a significantly lower rate of major complications compared to ORIF. According to our results, ORIF should be used cautiously for these types of fractures, considering the increased risk of deep infection.

Phase angle is related to physical function and quality of life in preoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can interfere with daily life and quality of life (QOL). Evaluating physical function and QOL and helping patients to improve is the focus of rehabilitation. Phase angle (PhA) assessment is widely used to measure body composition and is considered an indicator of physical function and QOL. This study investigated the relationship between PhA and physical function, physical activity, and QOL in patients with LSS. PhA, handgrip strength, walking speed, Timed Up and Go test (TUG), Life Space Assessment (LSA), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), and EQ-5D were assessed and statistically analyzed. The study included 133 patients with LSS. Multiple regression analysis of PhA adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (Model 1) and for Model 1 + PNI (Model 2) showed significant correlations (P < 0.05) with handgrip strength, walking speed, TUG, and LSA. Regarding QOL, PhA was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with lumbar function in JOABPEQ. PhA was associated with physical function and QOL in patients with LSS and might be a new clinical indicator in this population.

Contemporary Review: An Overview of the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has favorable psychometric and administrative properties in orthopaedic clinical research. It facilitates clinically meaningful data collection while minimizing administration time and survey fatigue and improving compliance. PROMIS is a critical component of patient-centered care and shared decision making, as it provides enhanced communication and engagement between patients and providers. As a validated instrument, it may also aid in measuring value-based health care quality. The goal of the current work is to provide an overview of PROMIS metrics used in orthopaedic foot and ankle, including advantages and disadvantages compared to legacy scales and PROMIS's applicability in specific foot and ankle conditions based on psychometric properties. We provide a review of the literature regarding the utilization of PROMIS as an outcome measure for specific foot and ankle procedures and conditions.

Recovery Curve for Patients With Pilon Fractures Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System

BACKGROUND

The time frame in which patients can expect functional improvement after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of pilon fractures is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the trajectory and rate at which patients' physical function improves up to 2 years postinjury.

METHODS

The patients studied sustained a unilateral, isolated pilon fractures (AO/OTA 43B/C) and followed at a level 1 trauma center over a 5-year period (2015-2020). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scores from these patients at defined follow-up times of immediately, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery defined the cohorts and were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

There were 160 patients with PROMIS scores immediately postoperatively, 143 patients at 6 weeks, 146 patients at 12 weeks, 97 at 24 weeks, 84 at 1 year, and 45 at 2 years postoperatively. The average PROMIS PF score was 28 immediately postoperatively, 30 at 6 weeks, 36 at 3 months, 40 at 6 months, 41 at 1 year, and 39 at 2 years. There was a significant difference between PROMIS PF scores between 6 weeks and 3 months (P < .001), and between 3 and 6 months (P < .001). Otherwise, no significant differences were detected between consecutive time points.

CONCLUSION

Patients with isolated pilon fractures demonstrate the majority of their improvement in terms of physical function between 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. No significant difference was detected in PF scores after 6 months postoperatively up to 2 years. Furthermore, the mean PROMIS PF score of patients 2 years after recovery was approximately 1 SD below the population average. This information is helpful in counseling patients and setting expectations for recovery after pilon fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic.

Clinical and Patient reported outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation for distal tibial intra-articular fractures

INTRODUCTION

Intra-articular distal tibial plafond fractures are rare injuries, provide a challenge for the surgeon and can often have poor outcomes. The aim of this paper was to report long term patient reported functional outcomes, health related quality of life (QoL) scores and rates of complications in order to fully counsel the patient on likely outcomes and set realistic post-operative expectations for the patient.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 20 patients with distal tibial intra-articular fractures that presented to our institution between September 2014 and September 2020. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Clinical, radiological and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), quality of life (QoL) scores and complications were collected.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 50.6 years (24-71). There were 7 males and 13 females. There were 4 open and 16 closed fractures. There were 7 Rüedi and Allgöwer (RA) Type 1, 9 Type 2 and 4 Type 3 fractures. The mean follow-up was 3.8 years [1-7]. The mean OMAS score was 54.3, reaching a peak at 2 years from injury. The mean QoL score (EQ5D5L) was 0.602, representing only 70 % of aged matched, UK population based norms.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst clinical outcomes are comparable with other studies, this report highlights this is a devastating injury, with most people taking 2 years to reach peak recovery. QoL outcome scores only reach 70 % normal and only 35 % of patients return to within 10 % of age matched population based norms.

Development of a nomogram to predict surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation for closed pilon fracture: a prospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

To explore the risk factors and develop a nomogram in order to predict surgical site infection (SSI) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for closed pilon fractures (CPF).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up was carried out in a provincial trauma center. From January 2019 to January 2021, 417 adult patients with CPFs receiving ORIF were enrolled. A Whitney U test or t test, Pearson chi-square test, and multiple logistic regression analyses were gradually used for screening the adjusted factors of SSI. A nomogram model was built to predict the risk of SSI, and the concordance index (C-index), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used for evaluating the prediction performance and consistency of the nomogram model. The bootstrap method was employed to test the validity of the nomogram.

RESULTS

The incidence of SSI after ORIF for CPFs was 7.2% (30/417): 4.1% (17/417) of superficial SSIs and 3.1% (13/417) of deep SSIs. The most common pathogenic bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (36.6%, 11/30). The multivariate analysis showed tourniquet use, longer preoperative stay, lower preoperative albumin (ALB), higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) were independent risk factors of SSI. Additionally, the C-index and bootstrap value of the nomogram model were 0.838 and 0.820, respectively. Finally, the calibration curve indicated that the actual diagnosed SSI had good consistency with the predicted probability, and the DCA showed that the nomogram had clinical value.

CONCLUSIONS

Tourniquet use, longer preoperative stay, lower preoperative ALB, higher preoperative BMI and Hs-CRP were five independent risk factors of SSI after closed pilon fractures treated by ORIF. These five predictors are shown on the nomogram, with which we may be able to further prevent the CPS patients from SSI. Trial registration NO 2018-026-1, October /24/2018, prospectively registered. The study was registered in October 24, 2018. The study protocol was designed based on the Declaration of Helsinki and admitted by the Institutional Review Board. The ethics committee approved the study on factors related to fracture healing in orthopedic surgery. Data analyzed in the present study were acquired from the patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation from January 2019 to January 2021.

Three-Year Follow-Up of a Traumatic Critical-Sized Tibial Bone Defect Treated with a 3D Printed Titanium Cage: A Case Report

CASE

We report a case involving a 21-year-old woman who sustained a Grade III open pilon fracture of the left ankle during a motor vehicle accident that resulted in a 12-cm critical-sized bone defect (CSD) that was successfully treated with a three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) cage, a tibiotalocalcaneal intramedullary nail, and autogenous and allograft bone. The patient's reported outcome measures were comparable with those reported for non-CSD injuries at 3-year follow-up. The authors conclude that 3D printed titanium cages offers a unique approach to traumatic limb salvage for tibial CSD.

CONCLUSIONS

3D printing offers a novel solution to CSDs. To the best of our knowledge, this case report details the largest 3D printed cage, to date, used to treat tibial bone loss. This report describes a unique approach to traumatic limb salvage with favorable patient-reported outcomes and evidence of radiographic fusion at a 3-year follow up.

Significant Factors of High Performance Outcomes for Tibial Plafond Fractures

BACKGROUND

Limited research exists about high performance postsurgical tibial plafond fractures. This study aimed to identify aspects of the plafond fracture injury and care associated with "high performance" based on Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scores.

METHODS

Tibial plafond fracture patients with minimum 12-month follow-up treated at a level 1 trauma center from 2006 to 2019 were categorized into high (top 25%) vs average-low (AL) (bottom 75%) performers based on PROMIS PF scores. Demographics and fracture characteristics of high and AL performers were compared. Variables with a P value less than .1 were used in stepwise logistic regressions.

RESULTS

The final cohort of 198 patients was divided into high (n=51) and AL (n=147) performers based on PF scores. The mean PF scores for the high and AL groups were 58 (SD=5.3) and 41.9 (SD=6.5), respectively. The mean PROMIS Pain Interference scores for the high performers and AL were 43.3 (SD=4.9) and 56.8 (SD=8.6) (P < .001), respectively. FAAM activities of daily living (high 95.4 [SD=5.5] vs AL 70.4 [SD=19.8], P < .001) and FAAM sports (high 76.8 [SD=21.3] vs AL 27.3 [SD=28.9], P < .001) subscale scores were significantly greater in the high-performing group. Sex, age, marital status, and diabetes were nonsignificant factors in univariate analysis. Significant demographic factors associated with high performance from univariate analysis were Caucasian race, private insurance, no tobacco use, lower body mass index (BMI), and mechanism of injury. Patients with fracture characteristics of OTA 43C (complete articular) fractures, bone loss, open fractures, or nonexcellent reduction were significantly less likely to be high performers. Additionally, less than excellent reductions were more common in more complex fracture patterns. Multivariable regression modeling showed that higher BMI, OTA/AO 43-C (complete articular) fracture classification, and open fracture were significant independent risk factors for reducing likelihood of high performance.

CONCLUSION

Significant independent factors associated with high performance after tibial plafond fracture are lower BMI, closed fracture, and OTA/AO 43-B (partial articular) fracture.

Syndesmotic Injury in Tibial Plafond Fractures Is Associated With Worse Patient Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To present long-term patient-reported outcomes of tibial plafond fractures with and without concomitant ankle syndesmotic injury.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred ninety-seven patients with tibial plafond fractures (OTA/AO 43-B and 43-C) treated with definitive surgical fixation were contacted by telephone or email to obtain patient-reported outcome scores at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Of those contacted, 148 (75%) had an intact syndesmosis, whereas 49 (25%) experienced a syndesmotic injury.

INTERVENTION

The intervention involved open reduction internal fixation of the tibial plafond with syndesmosis repair when indicated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The main outcome measurement included patient-reported ankle pain and function using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and physical function (PF).

RESULTS

The cohort including patients with syndesmotic injury had significantly more open fractures (syndesmotic injury = 39%, no syndesmotic injury = 16%, P = 0.001), higher rates of end-stage reconstruction (syndesmotic injury = 27%, no syndesmotic injury = 10%, P = 0.004), and worse PROMIS PF (syndesmotic injury = 42.5 [SD = 8.0], no syndesmotic injury = 47.1 [SD = 9.6], P = 0.045) scores at final follow-up when compared with the cohort comprising patients with no syndesmotic injury. Patients with syndesmotic injury trended toward higher rates of postoperative infection, but this association was not statistically significant. There was no difference between the groups in nonunion or PROMIS pain interference scores.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a tibial plafond fracture and concomitant syndesmotic injury had significantly worse PROMIS PF scores, more end-stage ankle reconstructions, and more open fractures. Syndesmotic injury in the setting of tibial plafond fractures portends worse patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

There are more things in physical function and pain: a systematic review on physical, mental and social health within the orthopedic fracture population using PROMIS

Background

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) is more and more extensively being used in medical literature in patients with an orthopedic fracture. Yet, many articles studied heterogeneous groups with chronic orthopedic disorders in which fracture patients were included as well. At this moment, there is no systematic overview of the exact use of PROMIS measures in the orthopedic fracture population. Therefore this review aimed to provide an overview of the PROMIS health domains physical health, mental health and social health in patients suffering an orthopedic fracture.

Methods

This systematic review was documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar in December 2020 using a combination of MeSH terms and specific index terms related to orthopedic fractures and PROMIS questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were available full text articles that were describing the use of any PROMIS questionnaires in both the adult and pediatric extremity fracture population.

Results

We included 51 relevant articles of which most were observational studies (n = 47, 92.2%). A single fracture population was included in 47 studies of which 9 involved ankle fractures (9/51; 17.6%), followed by humeral fractures (8/51; 15.7%), tibia fractures (6/51; 11.8%) and radial -or ulnar fractures (5/51; 9.8%). PROMIS Physical Function (n = 32, 32/51 = 62.7%) and PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 21, 21/51 = 41.2%) were most frequently used questionnaires. PROMIS measures concerning social (n = 5/51 = 9.8%) and mental health (10/51 = 19.6%) were much less often used as outcome measures in the fracture population. A gradually increasing use of PROMIS questionnaires in the orthopedic fracture population was seen since 2017.

Conclusion

Many different PROMIS measures on multiple domains are available and used in previous articles with orthopedic fracture patients. With physical function and pain interference as most popular PROMIS measures, it is important to emphasize that other health-domains such as mental and social health can also be essential to fracture patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00440-3.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Orthopaedic Trauma Research

This review describes the development, advantages and disadvantages, and applications of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in orthopaedic trauma. PROMIS is a useful tool for quantifying outcomes in orthopedic trauma. It allows measurement of outcomes across multiple domains while minimizing administration time. PROMIS also reliably identifies clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for poor outcomes across a variety of orthopaedic injuries and disease states. However, PROMIS lacks specificity for certain anatomic regions and validation for mental health outcomes. It also is limited by ceiling effects in certain active patient populations. Orthopaedic traumatologists should be familiar with PROMIS, as its use is increasing and it is a valuable tool that can aid in clinical decision making.