Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among women reporting extragenital exposures

Impact of education and clinic site champion on extragenital testing for sexually transmitted infections

BACKGROUND

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are on the rise in the United States. Infections at extragenital (EG) sites (throat or rectum) may serve as an overlooked reservoir for STIs. The aims of this project were to determine the proportion of patients receiving EG testing and to observe the impact of an educational intervention.

METHODS

Phase I included four urgent care clinics and baseline data for adults receiving STI testing (Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae). Clinics received access to an educational presentation regarding the importance of EG testing. Two of these clinics served as pilot sites for the implementation of self-collection kits. Phase II involved further expansion and utilization of clinic site champions.

RESULTS

Phase I baseline data indicated that less than 1% of samples from patients receiving STI testing were from EG sites. There was an increase in EG testing after the educational intervention and implementation of self-collection kits. A larger increase in EG testing was seen after utilization of a site champion in Phase II.

CONCLUSION

EG infections serve as a potential source for STI transmission which makes multi-site testing necessary. Our interventions to improve EG testing were most effective in Phase II after implementing a clinic site champion.

Extragenital Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Louisiana Parish Health Units, 2016-2019

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that men who have sex with men (MSM) get tested annually for urethral and rectal chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NG), and pharyngeal NG. There are no national recommendations to screen women and heterosexual men at extragenital sites. We assessed extragenital CT/NG screening among men and women at Louisiana's Parish Health Units (PHU).

METHODS

The Louisiana STD/HIV/Hepatitis Program piloted extragenital screening at 4 PHUs in February 2016 and expanded to 11 PHUs in 2017. Sexual histories were used to identify gender of sex partners and exposed sites. Because of billing restrictions, up to 2 anatomical sites were tested for CT/NG.

RESULTS

From February 2016 to June 2019, 70,895 urogenital and extragenital specimens (56,086 urogenital, 13,797 pharyngeal, and 1,012 rectal) were collected from 56,086 patients. Pharyngeal CT positivity was 160 of 7,868 (2.0%) among women, 54 of 4,838 (1.1%) among men who have sex with women (MSW) and 33 of 1,091 (3.0%) among MSM. Rectal CT positivity was 51 of 439 (11.6%) among women and 95 of 573 (16.6%) among MSM. Pharyngeal NG positivity was 299 of 7,868 (3.8%) among women, 222 of 4,838 (4.6%) among MSW, and 97 of 1,091 (8.9%) among MSM. Rectal NG positivity was 20 of 439 (4.6%) among women and 134 of 573 (23.4%) among MSM.Urogenital-only screening would have missed: among women, 173 of 3,923 (4.4%) CT and 227 of 1,480 (15.3%) NG infections; among MSW, 26 of 2,667 (1%) CT and 149 of 1,709 (8.7%) NG infections; and among MSM, 116 of 336 (34.5%) CT and 127 of 413 (42.1%) NG infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Many CT/NG infections would have been missed with urogenital-only screening. Men who have sex with men had much higher extragenital infection rates than women and MSW.

Added Value of Extragenital Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing in "IWantTheKit" Program Users

BACKGROUND

The 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted infection treatment guidelines recommend extragenital testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia in men who have sex with men and for women based on reported behaviors and exposures. The "IWantTheKit (IWTK)" program is a free online platform for specimen self-collection and mail-in for combined chlamydia/gonorrhea testing. We sought to assess the additional diagnostic value of extragenital testing compared with genital testing only for chlamydia/gonorrhea and determine factors associated with a positive extragenital test result among IWTK users.

METHODS

From August 2013 to January 2022, 7612 unique IWTK users returned swabs for testing; 3407 (45%) users requested both genital and extragenital tests and were included in this analysis. Descriptive statistics were summarized for demographic characteristics, reported behaviors, and genital and extragenital test results, and data were stratified by gender and age group. A logistic regression model was used to estimate associations between factors and extragenital sexually transmitted infection positivity.

RESULTS

Chlamydia positivity rates were 4.7%, 2.4%, and 1.5% at genital, extragenital, and both sites, respectively; for gonorrhea, 0.4%, 1.1%, and 0.4% were positive at those sites, respectively. Among women, age 25 years and younger was significantly associated with extragenital chlamydia (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; P = 0.010). Being in high-risk quiz score group was associated with extragenital chlamydia (OR, 2.6; P = 0.005) and extragenital gonorrhea in men and women (OR, 8.5; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Extragenital testing detected additional chlamydia and gonorrhea cases in the IWTK user population that would have been missed by genital-only testing, especially for women younger than 25 years and people reported to be at high risk.

Extragenital sexually transmitted infections

Aims: to study the prevalence rate and clinical features of extragenital STIs in both males and females. Materials and methods: a prospective observational clinical study included 57 patients with a history of unprotected orogenital and/or anogenital sexual contacts: group I (n=20) women practicing heterosexual sexual contacts, group II (n=9) men practicing heterosexual sexual contacts, group III (n=28) men who have sex with men (MSM). The identification of STIs was conducted by the polymerase chain reaction method and the ribosomal RNA NASBA detection method was used as an independent additional direct method. Results: a high level of detection of STIs of extragenital localization has been established: in heterosexual women in the rectum (10; 76.9%), in the oropharynx (9; 69.2%) and in the conjunctiva (2; 15.4%); in heterosexual men in the rectum (2; 40%), in the conjunctiva (2; 40%) and in the oropharynx (1; 20%); in MSM in the rectum (15; 75%), in the oropharynx (11; 55%) and in the conjunctiva (5; 25%); in 14 (36.8%) patients, STI infection of more than 2 localizations was found. In extragenital foci in group I patients chlamydia trachomatis infection was most frequently detected (5; 38.5%), in group II patients gonococcal infection (2; 40%), in group III patients syphilis (9; 45%), gonococcal infection (8; 40%) and chlamydia trachomatis infections (8; 40%). Asymptomatic infections in conjunctiva was detected in 4 (10.5%) patients, in oropharynx in 15 (39.5%), in rectum in 22 (57.9%) patients. Conclusions: the high level of detection of extragenital STIs and their frequent asymptomatic course dictates the need to study clinical samples from the oropharynx, rectum and conjunctiva not only when detecting objective and/or subjective symptoms of diseases, but also when there is a history of unprotected orogenital and/or anogenital sexual contacts, as well as when detected infections of genital localization.

Anal and Oral Sex Behaviors Among Young Black Men Who Have Vaginal Sex: Evidence of the Need for Extragenital Testing for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea

BACKGROUND

Unprotected oral and anal sex may result in extragenital sexually transmitted infections. The purposes of this study were to describe sexual behaviors, barrier use, and chlamydia/gonorrhea (Ct/GC) positivity among young Black men who have sex with women, and to examine the potential influence of extragenital infections on genital infections.

METHODS

Young Black men who had vaginal sex were screened for Ct/GC in New Orleans, LA, from August 14, 2019, to February 29, 2020. Audio/computer-assisted self-interviews were used to collect data on demographics and sexual behaviors. χ2 /Fisher exact or t test/Wilcoxon rank tests were used to assess differences in behaviors by Ct/GC positivity.

RESULTS

Among 373 men studied, 619 female partnerships were reported in the past 2 months. Vaginal sex was reported in all partnerships per study protocol, receiving fellatio in 42.7%, performing cunnilingus in 35.7%, and penile-anal sex in 5.9%. Although 31.4% of the men consistently used condoms for vaginal sex with all partners, consistent barrier use was low during cunnilingus (0.5%) and fellatio (5.1%). Urethral infection rates among all men in the sample were 12.6% for Ct and 1.6% for GC. There was no significant difference in Ct/GC rates between those using and not using condoms consistently during vaginal sex ( P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Unprotected oral sex with female partners was common. The high rate of genital infection among men who used condoms consistently for vaginal sex suggests that oral infections could be serving as a reservoir of genital infection. Testing at all sites of exposure for youth who engage in heterosexual sex is merited.

Anatomic site-specific gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and incidence among people with HIV engaged in care at four United States clinical centers, 2014-2018

Background

The incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is increasing in the United States; however, there are limited data on anatomic site-specific GC/CT among people with HIV (PWH).

Methods

We reviewed records of all PWH in care between January 1, 2014 and November 16, 2018 at four sites in the CFAR Network of Integrated Clinical Systems Cohort (CNICS; N = 8455). We calculated anatomic site-specific GC/CT testing and incidence rates and used Cox proportional hazards models modified for recurrent events to examine sociodemographic and clinical predictors of GC/CT testing and incidence at urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal sites. We also calculated site-specific number needed to test (NNT) to detect a positive GC/CT test.

Results

Of 8455 PWH, 2460 (29.1%) had at least yearly GC/CT testing at any anatomic site. The rates of urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal GC were 1.7 (95%CI:1.6, 1.9), 3.2 (95%CI:3.0, 3.5), and 2.7 (95%CI:2.5, 2.9) infections per 100 person-years, respectively. The rates of urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal CT were 1.9 (95%CI:1.7, 2.1), 4.3 (95%CI:4.0, 4.5), and 0.9 (95%CI:0.8, 1.0) infections per 100 person-years, respectively. PWH 16-39 years old experienced greater GC/CT rates at all anatomic sites while MSM experienced greater rates of extragenital infections. NNTs for urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal GC/CT were 20 (95%CI:19, 21), 5 (95%CI:5, 5), and 9 (95%CI:8, 9), respectively.

Conclusion

Many PWH are not tested annually for GC/CT and rates of GC/CT infection, particularly rates of extragenital infections, are high. We identified groups of PWH who may benefit from increased site-specific GC/CT testing.

Management of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States: Summary of Evidence From the Development of the 2020 Gonorrhea Treatment Recommendations and the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to all first-line recommended therapies, making gonococcal antimicrobial resistance a major public health concern given limited antibiotic options currently and an even smaller antimicrobial development pipeline. Since the release of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2015 STD Treatment Guidelines, azithromycin, part of the 2015 dual-drug treatment regimen, has had a rapid rise in resistance. The 2020 CDC Gonorrhea Treatment Recommendations and the 2021 Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Treatment Guidelines were developed weighing the priorities of treating the individual, protecting the population, and preventing antimicrobial resistance.

METHODS

Gonorrhea subject matter experts (SME) generated 8 key questions and conducted a literature review of updated data from 2013 to 2019 on gonorrhea antimicrobial resistance, treatment failures, clinical trials, and other key topics. More than 2200 abstracts were assessed, and 248 clinically relevant articles were thoroughly reviewed. SMEs also evaluated N gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance data from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP).

EVIDENCE

Although there have been reports of ceftriaxone treatment failures internationally, GISP data suggest that ceftriaxone minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) have remained stable in the United States, with < 0.1% exhibiting an "alert value" MIC (> 0.25 mcg/mL). However, GISP documented a rapid rise in the proportion of isolates with an elevated MIC (≥ 2.0 mcg/mL) to azithromycin-nearly 5% in 2018. At the same time, new pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data are available, and there is greater recognition of the need for antimicrobial stewardship.

SUMMARY

The 2021 CDC STI Treatment Guidelines now recommend 500mg ceftriaxone intramuscularly once for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea at all anatomic sites. If coinfection with chlamydia has not been excluded, cotreatment with doxycycline 100mg twice daily for 7 days should be added. Few alternative therapies exist for persons with cephalosporin allergies; there are no recommended alternative therapies for N gonorrhoeae infection of the throat.

Trends in Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing and Positivity Rates in a Safety Net Hospital in Georgia: 2014 to 2017

BACKGROUND

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States continue to increase at an alarming rate. Since 2015, reported cases of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC), the 2 most prevalent reportable STIs, have increased by 19% and 56%, respectively. Characterizing testing patterns could elucidate how CT/GC care and positivity have evolved over time in a high-risk urban setting and illustrate how patients use the health care system for their STI needs.

METHODS

Using electronic medical record data from a large safety net hospital in Georgia, patient demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted for all nucleic acid amplification tests ordered from 2014 to 2017 (n = 124,793). Descriptive statistics were performed to understand testing patterns and assess positivity rates.

RESULTS

Annual nucleic acid amplification test volume grew by 12.0% from 2014 to 2017. Obstetrics/gynecology consistently accounted for half of all tests ordered; volume in emergency medicine grew by 45.2% (n = 4108 in 2014 to n = 5963 in 2017), whereas primary care volume fell by -4.3% (n = 4186 in 2014 to n = 4005 in 2017). The largest number of positive results was detected among 15- to 24-year-olds. The positivity of CT was higher among females, and GC among males. The percent positivity of CT remained stable (range, 6.4%-7.0%). The percent positivity of GC increased from 2.7% to 4.3% over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing volume in emergency medicine has increased at a faster rate than other specialties; point-of-care testing could ensure more accurate treatment and improve antibiotic stewardship. The rates of CT/GC were high among adolescents and young adults. Tailored approaches are needed to lower barriers to care for this vulnerable population.

Oral, Vaginal and Anal Sexual Practices among Heterosexual Males and Females Attending a Sexual Health Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Melbourne, Australia

Sex practices among heterosexuals are not well studied. We aimed to explore sexual practices among heterosexuals attending a sexual health clinic. This cross-sectional survey was conducted at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between March and April 2019. Data were collected on kissing, oral sex (fellatio or cunnilingus), vaginal sex, anal sex and rimming in the previous 3 months. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between engaging in anal sex and other sex practices. There were 709 participants (333 men; 376 women) who were eligible and completed the survey (response rate was 24.6%). In the past 3 months, most participants had had vaginal sex (n = 677; 95.5%), with a mean of 3.0 (standard deviation (SD): 3.9) vaginal sex partners, and half reported engaging in condomless vaginal sex in the past 3 months (n = 358; 50.1%). A total of 135 (19.0%) participants had had anal sex, with a mean of 1.3 (SD: 1.0) anal sex partners, with 63.5% (n = 94) engaging in any condomless anal sex in the past 3 months. Most participants (n = 637, 89.8%) had received oral sex in the past 3 months; this proportion did not differ by age group or gender. Women (n = 351, 93.4%) were more likely to perform oral sex than men (n = 275; 82.6% men) (p < 0.001) and to have received rimming (26.6% women vs. 12.6% men; p < 0.001). Men were more likely to have performed rimming (25.5% men vs. 9.3% women; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, number of partners and sexual practice, anal sex was associated with being ≥35 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2–4.2), receiving rimming (aOR: 3.8; 95% CI: 2.4–6.0) and performing rimming (aOR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.8–4.6). Rimming and anal sex are practiced by one-fifth or more of heterosexuals. Older heterosexuals were more likely to engage in anal sex and to perform rimming. Future research should consider the benefits of testing extragenital sites where appropriate.

Multicenter comparison of nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of rectal and oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection

Research using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have repeatedly found rectal and oropharyngeal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae to be common and potentially more difficult to treat than genital infections. Unfortunately, public health and patient care efforts have been hampered by the lack of FDA-cleared NAATs with claims for anorectal or oropharyngeal samples. At the time of the initiation of this study, no commercially available assays had these claims. We formed a novel partnership among academic institutions and diagnostic manufacturers to address this public health need. From May 2018 through August 2019 we recruited 1108 women, 1256 men and 26 transgender persons each of whom provided 3 anal and 3 oropharyngeal swab specimens. The 3 anal swabs were pooled into a single transport tube as were the 3 oropharyngeal swabs. The performance of each of three study assays was estimated by comparison to the composite result and relative to one another. Percent positivity for chlamydia was 5.9 and 1.2% from anal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively compared to 4.2 and 4.1% for gonorrhea. Sensitivity for chlamydia detection ranged from 81.0-95.1% and 82.8-100% for anal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. Gonorrhea sensitivity ranged from 85.9-99.0% and 74.0-100% for anal and oropharyngeal samples, respectively. Specificity estimates were ≥ 98.9% for all assays, organisms and sample types. Although there was heterogeneity between sensitivity estimates, these assays offer better ability to detect extra genital infections than culture and potential solutions for providing appropriate sexual healthcare for populations in which these infections are of concern.

The Performance of Pooled 3 Anatomic Site Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women

BACKGROUND

Although molecular testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) is highly sensitive, the cost can be prohibitive. Those high costs are amplified when the recommended screening approach is used, which requires separate testing of specimens from 3 anatomic sites (rectal, pharyngeal and urogenital). Although individual molecular testing is standard of care, pooled testing may offer a cost-saving alternative.

METHODS

Using the Xpert® CT/NG assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) we tested urine, rectal and pharyngeal swabs for CT and NG in a high-risk cohort of participants assigned male at birth who reported sex with other persons who were assigned male at birth. Remnant specimens (0.34 mL from each anatomic site) were combined to perform a single 'pooled' test. We calculated positive and negative percent agreement between the pooled testing results with standard of care Xpert CT/NG test results as the reference.

RESULTS

We conducted 644 pooled tests. Of those, 598 (92.3%) gave CT and NG results. The CT-positive and -negative percent agreement were 90.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.7-95.9%) and 99.2% (98.1-99.8%), respectively. The NG-positive and -negative percent agreement were 96.2% (95% CI, 86.8-99.5%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.0-100%), respectively. Pooled testing identified 4 CT and 1 NG infections that were negative at all anatomic sites by individual testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-site pooled CT and NG testing performs similarly to single anatomic site testing among tests providing a valid result. Future cost analyses should evaluate the cost effectiveness of pooled 3-site testing to determine if such a strategy improves the feasibility and accessibility of molecular sexually transmitted infection testing.

Extragenital Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Among Women in the College Health Setting

BACKGROUND

Despite high frequencies of oral and receptive anal intercourse among young women, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not recommend routine oropharyngeal or anorectal screening for CT and GC. Risk-based extragenital screening of women has not been adopted at the majority of college health centers, and existing research has not focused on the female or college population.

METHODS

We examined health records of women at a college health center in a large urban university for 3 years to evaluate the effectiveness of CT and GC screening. We also evaluated the proportion of CT and GC infections that would have been missed if risk-based extragenital screening was not performed. Decisions to screen at extragenital sites were based on patient-reported risk behavior.

RESULTS

For 8027 unique chlamydia screens and 7907 unique gonorrhea screens, approximately 20% of the visits used extragenital screening in response to self-reported risk behaviors. More than 44% of patients were non-Hispanic White, and approximately 48% fell within the 20- to 24-year age group. The case positivity rates for CT were 2.85% with urogenital-only screening and 1.30% with risk-prompted extragenital screening (1.1% throat, 4.3% rectal). The case positivity rates for GC were 0.11% with urogenital-only screening and 0.37% with risk-prompted extragenital screening (0.37% throat, 0% rectal). If the college health center had relied solely on urogenital screening rather than adding risk-based extragenital screening, 4.41% of CT infections would have been missed and 28.57% of GC infections would have been missed.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 1 of 22 CT infections and nearly 1 of 3 GC infections would have been missed without extragenital screening in this analysis of college women. Inclusion of risk-prompted extragenital screening in asymptomatic STD screening protocols can help clinicians diagnose CT and GC infections that would be have been missed with urogenital-only screening. Although rectal GC infections among women seem to be less common, oropharyngeal testing, in particular, for GC is suggested for women based on sexual risk. However, clinicians might only identify these risks if they ask patients directly about these potential exposures. Because guidelines exist only for men, future studies should focus on extragenital screening in college women to build the evidence that this particular population of patients may benefit from this practice, given the high risk of STDs in young adults.

Promoting safer sex in the context of heterosexual anal intercourse: A scoping review

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To locate and summarise existing literature regarding safer sex practices specific to heterosexual anal intercourse and identify promising health promotion strategies.

BACKGROUND

Much of the literature regarding anal intercourse and safer sex is related to men who have sex with men. However, some studies suggest there are more women than men engaging in unprotected receptive anal intercourse. The risks associated with this sexual practice have been well documented, although many healthcare providers fail to ask about anal intercourse while addressing safer sex in the heterosexual population.

DESIGN

The study was based on Arksey and O'Malley's 2005 five-step methodology.

METHODS

A search was conducted of MEDLINE; CINAHL; PsycInfo; Cochrane; and PubMed. Databases were searched from 1990-2020. The 72 studies selected were classified according to their main area of focus. A grey literature search was also included. This scientific submission has been assessed for accuracy and completeness using the PRISMA-ScR guideline criteria (File S1).

RESULTS

The literature in this area is heterogeneous in terms of method and topic. Prevalence and incidence (n = 26) in addition to sexually transmitted infection risks (n = 26) related to heterosexual anal intercourse are well understood. However, there is limited information on condom use (n = 6), factors that influence heterosexual anal intercourse (n = 10) and health promotion strategies for this population and practice (n = 4). Two websites that mentioned heterosexual anal intercourse risk reduction activities were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Although heterosexual anal intercourse appears to be an increasingly common sexual practice, very little is known about health promotion strategies nurses might use for encouraging safer sex in this population.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Increased awareness of the prevalence and risks of heterosexual anal intercourse could enhance nurses' harm reduction strategies. Screening for sexually transmitted infections may be based on incorrect assumptions about sexual practices or due to stigma linked with anal intercourse. Reducing unprotected heterosexual anal intercourse will reduce sexually transmitted infections and their long-term sequelae.

[Gonococcal pharyngitis]

A description of a clinical case of oligosymptomatic pharyngitis associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae is presented. On the example of oligosymptomatic localized gonococcal pharyngitis in a sexually active young man, included in the risk group for extragenital forms of sexually transmitted infections, an advantage has been shown molecular biological diagnostic method. Study of the spectrum of microflora of the oropharynx and urethra with assessment sensitivity to antibacterial drugs of representatives of the genus Neisseria isolated during mixed infection oropharynx, demonstrated that non-pathogenic Neisseria species are resistant to cephalosporins III-IV generations. Unrecognized forms of oropharyngeal gonococcal infection, as a consequence of the complications of clinical and diagnostic identification when patients refer to an otolaryngologist or dermatovenerologist, can serve a reservoir of resistant N. gonorrhoeae and a source of intractable gonococcal infection.

Simultaneous Evaluation of Diagnostic Assays for Pharyngeal and Rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Using a Master Protocol

Background

Pharyngeal and rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis play important roles in infection and antibacterial resistance transmission, but no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–cleared assays for detection at these sites existed prior to this study. The objective was to estimate performance of assays to detect those infections in pharyngeal and rectal specimens to support regulatory submission.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional, single-visit study of adults seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at 9 clinics in 7 states. We collected pharyngeal and rectal swabs from participants. The primary outcome was positive and negative percent agreement for detection of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis for 3 investigational assays compared to a composite reference. Secondary outcomes included positivity as well as positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios. Subgroup analyses included outcomes by symptom status and sex.

Results

A total of 2598 participants (79% male) underwent testing. We observed N. gonorrhoeae positivity of 8.1% in the pharynx and 7.9% in the rectum and C. trachomatis positivity of 2.0% in the pharynx and 8.7% in the rectum. Positive percent agreement ranged from 84.8% to 96.5% for different anatomic site infection combinations, whereas negative percent agreement was 98.8% to 99.6%.

Conclusions

This study utilized a Master Protocol to generate diagnostic performance data for multiple assays from different manufacturers in a single study population, which ultimately supported first-in-class FDA clearance for extragenital assays. We observed very good positive percent agreement when compared to a composite reference method for the detection of both pharyngeal and rectal N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02870101.

Detection of Three Sexually Transmitted Infections by Anatomic Site: Evidence From an Internet-Based Screening Program

Urogenital and rectal specimens collected from the "IWantTheKit" Internet-based sexually transmitted infection screening program were evaluated for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Of 881 paired specimens submitted from August 2013 to December 2016, 15.0% (n = 132) tested positive for 1 or more sexually transmitted infections, of which 50.8% (n = 67) were identified exclusively through rectal testing.

Update your "sore throat" differential list: A case report and discussion of oral chlamydia

ABSTRACT

There has been an exponential increase in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States, causing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to declare an epidemic. Current evidence demonstrates that extragenital STIs of the oropharynx and rectum are often asymptomatic and may not be associated with concurrent positive urogenital infections. As a result, these infections are often missed in primary care. Furthermore, guidelines only recommend extragenital site testing in men who have sex with men, excluding oropharyngeal chlamydia, despite evidence that extragenital STIs are occurring in other high-risk populations as well. A case report is provided to enhance primary health care providers' knowledge of extragenital STIs and promote early recognition and testing to improve patient outcomes.

Prevalence of urogenital, anal, and pharyngeal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Mycoplasma genitalium: a cross-sectional study in Reunion island

Background

Recommendations for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening vary significantly across countries. This study evaluated the prevalence of urogenital and extragenital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) in patients visiting a French STI clinic in the Indian Ocean region to determine whether current STI screening practices should be updated.

Methods

This cross-sectional study examined all patients who visited the STI clinic between 2014 and 2015. Triplex polymerase chain reaction screening for CT, NG, and MG was performed on urine, vaginal, pharyngeal, and anal specimens (FTD Urethritis Basic Kit, Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg).

Results

Of the 851 patients enrolled in the study, 367 were women (367/851, 43.2%) and 484 were men (484/851, 56.0%). Overall, 826 urogenital specimens (826/851, 97.1%), 606 pharyngeal specimens (606/851, 71.2%), and 127 anal specimens (127/851, 14.9%) were taken from enrolled patients. The prevalence of urogenital CT and MG was high in women ≤25 years (19/186, 10.21%; 5/186, 2.69%) and in men who have sex with women ≤30 years (16/212, 7.54%; 5/212, 2.36%). Among patients with urogenital CT infection, 13.7% (7/51) had urethritis. All patients with urogenital MG infection were asymptomatic. Men who have sex with men had a high prevalence of pharyngeal CT (2/45, 4.44%) and NG (3/44, 6.81%) and a high prevalence of anal CT (2/27, 7.41%), NG (2/27, 7.40%), and MG (1/27, 3.70%). After excluding patients with concomitant urogenital infection, extragenital infections with at least 1 of the 3 pathogens were found in 20 swabs (20/91, 21.9%) taken from 16 patients (16/81, 19.7%), all of them asymptomatic.

Conclusions

Routine multisite screening for CT, NG, and MG should be performed to mitigate the transmission of STIs in high-risk sexually active populations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05801-9.

Routine universal testing versus selective or incidental testing for oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Women are not routinely tested for oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae. At present, selective testing based on sexual behaviour or risk groups is advocated by international guidelines. Many oropharyngeal infections are asymptomatic and thus remain undetected, establishing a reservoir for ongoing transmission. Data on effectiveness of routine testing are scarce, thus we aimed to assess the optimal testing strategy for oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae in women.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used surveillance data obtained from all sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics in the Netherlands between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2017. We collected consultation-level data, and individual-level patient data from 2016 onwards, on sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviour in the past 6 months, self-reported symptoms, and STI diagnoses. We compared the prevalence of oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae between women who attended clinics that offered routine universal testing (defined as >85% of women tested per clinic-year) and women who attended clinics that offered selective testing (defined as 5-85% of women tested per clinic-year) or incidental testing (<5% of women tested per clinic-year). We calculated the number of infections missed by selective testing by extrapolating prevalence for the routine universal testing group to that of weighted and unweighted samples of all selectively tested women. We used multivariable generalised estimating equations to identify independent risk factors for oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae to identify the optimal selective testing strategy.

FINDINGS

554 266 consultations with at least one N gonorrhoeae test were recorded, of which 545 750 consultations (including repeat visits) were included in the analyses. Of 545 750 consultations, routine universal testing was used in 57 359 (10·5%), selective testing in 444 283 (81·4%), and incidental testing in 44 108 (8·1%). The prevalence of oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae was 1·4% (95% CI 1·3-1·5; 703 of 50 962 consultations) in the routine testing group compared with 1·4% (1·3-1·5; 1858 of 132 276) in the selective testing group (p=0·68) and 2·8% (1·9-3·9; 30 of 1088) in the incidental testing group (p<0·0001). The prevalence of oropharyngeal-only infections was 47·7% (335 of 703 women) in the routine testing group, 53·3% (991 of 1858) in the selective testing group, and 60·0% (18 of 30) in the incidental testing group. Selective testing would have missed an estimated 4363 (70%; 95% CI 69-71) of all 6221 oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae infections. Independent risk factors for oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae were being notified for any STI (adjusted odds ratio 2·1, 95% CI 1·5-3·0), reporting sex work (4·0, 2·3-6·7), and having concurrent genital (51·5, 34·1-77·7) or anorectal (2·6, 1·4-4·8) N gonorrhoeae. Selective testing of women notified for any STI, or who reported sex work, would have led to 5418 (27·8%) of 19 455 women being tested and would have identified 119 (55·6%) of 214 oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae infections.

INTERPRETATION

Selective testing potentially misses more than two-thirds of oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae infections in women, of whom half have oropharyngeal infections without concurrent genital or anorectal infections. Using independent risk factors for oropharyngeal infection to guide testing is a minimal testing strategy. Routine universal testing is the optimum scenario to detect the majority of infections. However, future studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine testing and its effect on antimicrobial resistance.

FUNDING

Public Health Service South Limburg.

Evidence supporting the standardisation of extragenital gonorrhoea and chlamydia screenings for women

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines for women do not include extragenital screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and do not mention anal sex behaviour. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the number of potentially missed CT and NG cases by relying on urogenital screening and self-reported anal sex behaviour among women.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data of 4658 women attending a community health centre in Los Angeles, California, USA from 2015 to 2018 were examined. CT and NG were detected using nucleic acid amplification test (APTIMA Combo 2, Hologic Gen-Probe, San Diego, California). Demographic and behavioural factors were also examined to assess potentially missed NG/CT cases. Multivariable regression analyses were used to determine whether reported anal sex behaviour predicts NG/CT rectal infection.

RESULTS

A total of 193 NG cases and 552 CT cases were identified; however, 53.9% of NG cases and 25.5% of CT cases were identified exclusively through extragenital screening. Of all positive cases of rectal CT, 87.0% did not report anal sex without a condom and 91.3% did not report any anal sex with their last sexual partner. Of all positive cases of rectal NG, 78.9% did not report anal sex without a condom and 76.3% did not report any anal sex with their last sexual partner. Anal sex with last partner was not predictive of NG/CT rectal infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Relying solely on urogenital screening and reported behaviour misses NG/CT cases. Extragenital NG/CT screening should be conducted in all women regardless of reported anal sex behaviour.

Background review for the '2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults'

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. This review provides the detailed background, evidence base and discussions, for the 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).

Pediatric Emergency Provider Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Practices in Adolescents With Oropharyngeal or Anorectal Chief Complaints

OBJECTIVES

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) may present with oropharyngeal or anorectal symptoms. Little is known about the evaluation of adolescents with these complaints in the pediatric emergency department (PED). This study aimed to determine the frequency of and factors associated with STI consideration and testing in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients aged 13 to 18 years who presented to an urban PED with oropharyngeal or anorectal chief complaints between June 2014 and May 2015. Sexually transmitted infection consideration was defined as sexual history documentation, documentation of STI in differential diagnosis, and/or diagnostic testing. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with consideration.

RESULTS

Of 767 visits for oropharyngeal (89.4%), anorectal (10.4%), or both complaints, 153 (19.9%) had STI consideration. Of the 35 visits (4.6%) that included gonorrhea and/or chlamydia testing, 12 (34.3%) included testing at the anatomic site of complaint. Of those 12 tests, 50.0% were the incorrect test. Patients with older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-1.7), female sex (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.03-2.5), or anorectal complaints (aOR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3-4.3) were more likely to have STI consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

In an urban PED, only 20% of visits for adolescents with oropharyngeal or anorectal symptoms included STI consideration. Testing was performed in only 5% of cases and often at an inappropriate anatomic site or with the incorrect test. Interventions to increase awareness of appropriate STI consideration and testing for individuals presenting with possible extragenital complaints may help reduce STIs among adolescents.

2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. For detailed background, evidence base and discussions, see the background review for the present 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).

Extragenital Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among Adolescents and Young Adults at a Sexual Health Clinic

OBJECTIVE

To increase screening rates for oropharyngeal and rectal (extragenital) chlamydia and gonorrhea infections among adolescents and young adults by 20% and for 90% of nurses to demonstrate a change in behavior and knowledge surrounding extragenital screening.

DESIGN

A pre- and posttest design to evaluate nurse knowledge and the percentage of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea screenings completed before and after a 2-month intervention period.

SETTING

Reproductive health clinic for adolescents and young adults up to age 25 years in the Twin Cities metropolitan area of Minnesota.

PARTICIPANTS

Four registered nurses who provide direct client care at the identified sexual and reproductive health clinic.

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

We implemented an education session for four staff nurses, a standardized sexual history taking tool, and protocols for obtaining oropharyngeal and rectal specimens. We measured extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea screening rates, as well as knowledge and behavior change among registered nurses.

RESULTS

Data came from records for 623 individuals who were deemed at risk for extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea infection. Extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea screening rates increased by more than 700% from before to after the intervention. Five out of nine (55.6%) extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea infections diagnosed would have been missed with urogenital screening alone. One hundred percent of nurses demonstrated an increase in their knowledge of the 5 P's of sexual health (Partners, Practices, Protection from sexually transmitted infections, Past history of STIs, and Prevention of pregnancy) to conduct a risk assessment, the eligibility criteria for extragenital testing, and the actual collection processes of pharyngeal and rectal swabs.

CONCLUSION

Use of evidence-based recommendations and a collaborative team facilitated a more consistent approach to the assessment and diagnosis of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Generalizability is limited to the project site; however, this process could be implemented in other clinics to determine if similar results can be achieved.

High prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Western French Guiana

The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections in western French Guiana and to analyze associated factors with both infections. A retrospective study was conducted in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in 2017. Women (n = 338) were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction for vaginal, anal and throat CT and NG infections. Men (n = 192) were evaluated using urine specimens. Socio-demographic and sexual behaviour data were collected by nurses with a structured questionnaire. The prevalence of CT and NG infections among women were 24.3% and 13.3%, respectively, and 12.0% and 7.3% among men. Women aged under 25 years had a higher risk of CT and NG infections than women aged 35 years or more. Another risk factor for CT infection was low educational level, and occasional unprotected sex for NG infection. CT and NG infections were associated with reporting symptoms among men. Very high prevalences of CT and NG infections among women and men were found, which suggest that a large-scale screening strategy should be implemented in French Guiana.

Detection of Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis in Heterosexual Men Who Report Cunnilingus

BACKGROUND

Rectal infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is frequent in women who deny receptive anal sex and is thought to arise from autoinoculation of the rectum from vaginal secretions. An alternate hypothesis is that oral sex inoculates and establishes gastrointestinal tract infection. Distinguishing these hypotheses is difficult in women. In men, autoinoculation is unlikely and heterosexual men frequently perform oral sex, but rarely participate in receptive anal exposure behaviors.

METHODS

We enrolled high-risk men with and without nongonococcal urethritis who presented to a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Indianapolis, Indiana. Urine and rectal swabs were collected and tested for urogenital and rectal CT, Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG). Men completed surveys concerning symptoms, sexual orientation, and detailed recent and lifetime oral and anal sexual behaviors.

RESULTS

Rectal CT was detected in 2/84 (2.4%) heterosexual men who reported cunnilingus, but no lifetime receptive anal behaviors. All of the men who denied receptive anal behaviors were negative for rectal NG and MG. In homosexual and bisexual men, rectal CT prevalence was high (9.7%), and rectal NG (4.8%) and MG (4.8%) were also detected.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected rectal CT infections in heterosexual men who reported cunnilingus but denied receptive anal behaviors. Oral sex may be a risk factor for rectal CT infection via oral inoculation of the gastrointestinal tract.

Extragenital Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Among Men and Women According to Type of Sexual Exposure

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend screening for extragenital gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia (CT) only among men having sex with men (MSM). Extragenital GC and CT is associated with treatment failure and disease transmission. The prevalence of extragenital GC/CT infections in women and in men having sex with women (MSW) are less well studied. We sought to determine the prevalence of extragenital CG and CT among all persons attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic who engaged in extragenital sexual activity.

METHODS

We examined demographic and clinical data of all patients who engaged in extragenital sexual activity between January 2012 and October 2014. Nucleic acid amplification testing for GC and CT was performed at sites of exposure among all men and women at pharyngeal, rectal, and urogenital sites. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the extent that age, race/ethnicity, and number of sexual partners predicted a positive test result.

RESULTS

Pharyngeal GC was found in 3.1% of MSW, representing 35% of the GC infections in MSW. Thirty-six percent of MSW with pharyngeal GC tested negative at their urogenital site. Pharyngeal GC in MSW prevalence was higher among those with younger age or a higher number of sex partners. Pharyngeal GC, rectal GC, and rectal CT rates were 8.5%, 15.0%, and 16.5%, respectively, among MSM and 3.8%, 4.8%, and 11.8% among women having sex with men (WSM), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Extragenital GC and CT rates of infection was highest among MSM but was also observed in WSM and MSW, representing an unrecognized disease burden.

Infrequent Testing of Women for Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the United States

Background

Anal sex is a common sexual behavior among women that increases their risk of acquiring rectal infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC).

Methods

We estimated the frequency and positivity of rectal CT and GC tests for women aged 15-60 years performed by a large US commercial laboratory between November 2012 and September 2015. We also estimated the frequency and positivity of pharyngeal and genital specimens also performed on the same date. Among women with a positive CT or GC result, we estimated the frequency and positivity of recommended repeat testing within 12 months.

Results

Of 5499 women who had rectal CT and GC tests, positivity was 10.8%. On the same date, approximately 80% also had genital CT tests, genital GC tests, and pharyngeal GC tests, while 40% had pharyngeal CT tests. Rectal CT or GC infection was associated with genital CT or GC infection, but 46.5% of rectal CT and GC infections would not have been identified with genital testing alone. Among women with a rectal CT or GC infection, only 20.0% had a recommended repeat rectal test. Of those who had a repeat test, 17.7% were positive.

Conclusions

Testing women for rectal CT and GC was infrequent, but positive tests were often found in women with negative genital tests. Most women with positive rectal tests were not retested. Interventions are needed to increase extragenital CT and GC testing of at-risk women.

Factors Associated With Pharyngeal Gonorrhea in Young People: Implications for Prevention

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to examine the proportion of missed infections and correlates of pharyngeal gonorrhea among young people attending public sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study of 245 young men and women between April 2012 and May 2014. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they (1) were 15 to 29 years of age, (2) reported giving oral sex to a partner of the opposite sex in the past 90 days, and (3) attended 1 of 12 public STD clinics in Los Angeles County. Computer-assisted self-interviews were used to collect information on sexual behaviors and tests were conducted for pharyngeal and urogenital gonorrhea.

RESULTS

Most participants were younger than 25 years (69%) and more than half were female (56%). We identified a total of 64 cases (27%) of gonorrhea, of which 29 (45%) were a urogenital only infection, 18 (28%) were a pharyngeal only, and 17 (27%) were dually infected at both sites. Pharyngeal testing increased case finding by 39% from 46 to 64 cases. After adjusting for age, sex, and number of sex partners, those who reported consistent pharyngeal exposure to ejaculate/vaginal fluids were 3 times as likely to have pharyngeal gonorrhea as compared with those without this exposure (adjusted odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-7.5).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of gonorrhea cases among young people would be missed in the absence of pharyngeal testing. These results have implications for those who provide medical care to clients at STD clinics and highlight the need for pharyngeal screening recommendations and counseling messages related to strategies to reduce exposure to infected fluids.

Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections Among Women Reporting Anal Intercourse

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence and treatment of rectal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among women reporting receptive anal intercourse in a network of sexually transmitted disease or sexual health clinics and estimate the proportion of missed infections if women were tested at the genital site only.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae test results from female patients reporting receptive anal intercourse in the preceding 3 months during visits to 24 sexually transmitted disease clinics from 2015 to 2016. Primary outcomes of interest were 1) anatomic site-specific C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing and positivity among women attending selected U.S. sexually transmitted disease clinics who reported receptive anal intercourse and 2) the proportion of rectal infections that would have remained undetected if only genital sites were tested.

RESULTS

Overall, 7.4% (3,743/50,785) of women reported receptive anal intercourse during the 2 years. Of the 2,818 women tested at both the genital and rectal sites for C trachomatis, 292 women were positive (61 genital only, 60 rectal only, and 171 at both sites). Of the 2,829 women tested at both the genital and rectal sites for N gonorrhoeae, 128 women were positive (31 genital only, 23 rectal only, and 74 at both sites). Among women tested at both anatomic sites, the proportion of missed C trachomatis infections would have been 20.5% and for N gonorrhoeae infections, 18.0%.

CONCLUSION

Genital testing alone misses approximately one fifth of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae infections in women reporting receptive anal intercourse in our study population. Missed rectal infections may result in ongoing transmission to other sexual partners and reinfection.

Meta-analysis of the Cepheid Xpert® CT/NG assay for extragenital detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections

Background Most studies evaluating extragenital testing performance for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) detection by the Xpert® CT/NG show high per cent agreement with comparison assays; however, the precision around positive per cent agreement is low and thus the values that have been reported are not highly informative. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted and data from five studies were combined to better assess positive per cent agreement.

METHODS

The literature indexed on PubMed.gov was searched. Included studies were those that were an evaluation of the Xpert CT/NG assay with rectal and/or pharyngeal specimen types compared with another nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), the Aptima transcription mediated amplification assay. A full Bayesian method was used for bivariate fixed-effect meta-analysis of positive and negative per cent agreement and pooled estimates (and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were presented for each.

RESULTS

The pooled positive and negative per cent agreement for detection of CT in rectal specimens was 89.72% (95% CI: 84.97%, 93.64%) and 99.23% (95% CI: 98.74%, 99.60%), and in pharyngeal specimens, they were 89.96% (95% CI: 66.38%, 99.72%) and 99.62% (95% CI: 98.95%, 99.95%) respectively. For NG detection in rectal specimens, the pooled positive and negative per cent agreement was 92.75% (95% CI: 87.91%, 96.46%) and 99.75% (95% CI: 99.46%, 99.93%), and in pharyngeal specimens, they were 92.51% (95% CI: 85.84%, 97.18%) and 98.56% (95% CI: 97.69%, 99.23%) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It was found that the Xpert CT/NG assay performed similarly to the Aptima transcription mediated amplification assay for the detection of CT and NG in extragenital specimens. The Xpert assay has the benefit of providing faster results at the point-of-care, thus reducing the turnaround time for results, potentially enabling same-day treatment.

Extragenital Screening Is Essential for Comprehensive Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Pediatric Population

Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are the two most common causes of sexually transmitted disease in the United States. Studies in adults, mostly in men who have sex with men, have shown that the prevalence of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections is much higher in extragenital sources compared to urogenital sources. A similar large sample of data on the burden of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections by anatomic site is lacking in children. We retrospectively analyzed data from 655 patients tested for C. trachomatis (887 specimens) and N. gonorrhoeae (890 specimens) at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. We restricted the analysis to include patients between 2 and 17 years of age that had all three sources (urine, oropharynx, and rectum) collected at the same visit. The final data set included specimens from all three sources from 148 and 154 patients for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, respectively. Specimens were tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae using a Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay. The burden of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection was significantly higher in the 14- to 17-year age group (24.7%, P = 0.041; 25.8%; P = 0.001) compared to the 10- to 13-year (5.9%; 5.6%), 6- to 9-year (4.6%; 4.6%), and 2- to 5-year (8.3%; 0%) age groups, respectively. The positivity rate for C. trachomatis was highest for rectal (16.2%), followed by urine (5.4%) and oropharyngeal (0.7%) sites. The positivity rate for N. gonorrhoeae was highest for rectal sites (10.4%), followed by oropharyngeal (9.7%) and urine (1.9%) sites. The source with highest diagnostic yield is rectum for C. trachomatis and rectum and oropharynx for N. gonorrhoeae Hence, extragenital screening is critical for the comprehensive detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in the pediatric population.

Factors associated with anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test positivity in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There has been considerable discussion about anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in women, with some calling for anorectal CT screening, but little about anorectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). Given that urogenital NG is more strongly associated with pelvic inflammatory disease, this is an evidence gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the associations between anorectal CT in women and CT positivity at other sites (urogenital/oropharyngeal) and with anal intercourse, and compares these with anorectal NG within the same study populations.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for English-language studies published to October 2018 using the following terms: ("Chlamydia" OR "Chlamydia trachomatis") AND (("anal" OR "rect*" OR "anorect*") OR ("extra?genital" OR "multi?site")). Studies were included if anorectal NG data were available. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated pooled estimates; heterogeneity was investigated using meta-regression.

RESULTS

25 studies were eligible. Anorectal CT positivity ranged from 0% to 17.5%, with a summary estimate of 8.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 9.1; I²=88.5%). Anorectal NG positivity ranged from 0% to 17.0%, with a summary estimate of 2.1% (95% CI 1.6 to 2.8; I²=92.7%). The association between urogenital and anorectal positivity was stronger for NG than CT (summary prevalence ratio (PR)=89.3 (95% CI 53.1 to 150.3; I²=80.1%), PR=32.2 (95% CI 25.6 to 40.7; I²=70.3%), respectively), and between oropharyngeal and anorectal positivity it was stronger for NG than CT (PR=34.8 (95% CI 10.2 to 118.2; I²=89.9%), PR=8.8 (95% CI 6.8 to 11.5; I²=58.1%), respectively). Anal intercourse was associated with anorectal NG (PR=4.3; 95% CI 2.2 to 8.6; I²=0.0%) but not with anorectal CT (PR=1.0; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.4; I²=0.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anorectal CT is more common than anorectal NG, but anorectal NG is more strongly associated with anal intercourse, urogenital and oropharyngeal NG, suggesting that ongoing discussion about anorectal CT should also include NG. Longitudinal data are required to further understanding of the aetiology of anorectal STIs and assess whether anorectal screening is needed in women.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42df017080188.

Extragenital chlamydia infection among active-duty women in the United States Navy

BACKGROUND

Pharyngeal and anorectal reservoirs of gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia (CT) are increasingly recognized among heterosexual women. While a number of studies performed at sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics have found a high prevalence of extragenital GC/CT infection, such screening is typically not offered during routine primary care visits for women. We sought to define the prevalence of and factors associated with extragenital GC/CT among women in the U.S. Navy.

METHODS

We recruited servicewomen stationed in San Diego, California, between the ages of 18 and 25 who presented for an annual physical exam between January and September, 2017. Nucleic acid amplification testing was performed on swabs collected at endocervical, oropharyngeal and anorectal sites to assess the presence of GC/CT. An anonymous behavioral questionnaire was also administered to characterize sexual risk. Descriptive statistics were used to compare women with and without a prior history of any sexually transmitted infection (STI) (self-report) along with a current GC/CT diagnosis. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.

RESULTS

Of the 75 patients who were approached, 60 subjects were enrolled in the study, including white 20 (33.3%), black/African American 18 (31.0%), Hispanic/Latina 13 (21.7%) and Asian/Pacific Islander 9 (15.5%) women. Among all the women, six (10.0%) were diagnosed with CT infection, all via endocervical exam. Of these, five (8.3%) had concurrent anorectal infection, including two cases (3.3%) accompanied by pharyngeal infection. Of the subjects, 15 (25.0%) reported anal intercourse in their most recent sexual encounter, most of which was condomless (13/15, 86.7%). A high number of women who reported sex with a casual male partner (19/45, 42.2%) reported rarely or never using condoms; last, 41.7% consuming at least 3 drinks on a typical drinking day, and one-third of the reported drinking more than once per week.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high prevalence of anorectal CT infection, although no infections were detected without concurrent endocervical involvement. Nonetheless, the high prevalence of condomless anal intercourse reported by participants argues for further study and ongoing consideration of extragenital screening among high-risk patients. Behavioral interventions are also warranted given the high prevalence of sexual and related risk factors.

A Narrative Review of Internet Use, Interpersonal Connectedness, and Sexual Behaviour Among Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men

Researchers have often considered the impact that online dating has had on gay communities; with some arguing that changes in social behavior may impact the spread of HIV. However, these conclusions are based on the premise that the Internet has fundamentally changed the way gay and bisexual men connect with their communities. Addressing this issue, we searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies examining Internet use and interpersonal connectedness among gay and bisexual men to determine whether those who used the Internet to find sexual partners exhibited different patterns of community connectedness. Though sporadic, findings suggest that Internet use may be associated with lower gay identity, community attachment, and social embeddedness. However, recent reports have suggested that online sex seeking might be associated with greater, not less, interpersonal connectedness. We conclude that additional longitudinal analyses and consistent measurement of gay men's social behavior are needed to draw more definite conclusions.

Sexually transmitted infections: Need for extragenital screening

Extragenital infections can occur concurrently with simultaneous urogenital infections. Extragenital sites are believed to serve as hidden reservoirs and play a critical role in their transmission. The etiological relationship of the most widespread Sexually transmitted diseases (STD) pathogen to reproductive tract has long been established, but the distribution to extragenital sites appears to be infrequent and its correlation with the sexual practice still requires to be investigated. Optimal-screening strategies for extragenital infections are largely unknown. However, there is a lack of data on clinical outcomes and optimal treatment regimens for rectal and pharyngeal extragenital infections. Further studies are needed in settings other than reproductive health and STD clinics, especially in primary care clinics and resource-limited settings.

Anorectal swabs as a marker of male-to-male sexual exposure in STI surveillance systems

Identification of priority populations such as men who have sex with men (MSM) is important in surveillance systems to monitor trends of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We explored using routinely collected non-behavioural data as a means to establish MSM status in surveillance by assessing anorectal swab as a marker of male-to-male sexual exposure. We used chlamydia testing data from a sexual health clinic, 2007-2012. Men reporting any male sexual partner(s) in the previous 12 months were considered MSM. The dataset was split into development and validation samples to develop a univariate predictive model and assess the model fit. The dataset included 30 358 individual men and 48 554 episodes of STI testing; 45% were among reported MSM and an anorectal swab was performed in 40% of testing episodes. Anorectal swabbing had good diagnostic performance as a marker for MSM status (sensitivity = 87%, specificity = 99%, positive predictive value = 98·6%, negative predictive value = 90·3%). The model showed good fit against the internal validation sample (area under the curve = 0·93). Anorectal swabs are a valid marker of MSM behaviour in surveillance data from sexual health clinics, and they are likely to be particularly useful for monitoring STI trends among MSM with higher risk behaviour.

Analysis of laboratory testing results for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an STI clinic in India: Need for extragenital screening

BACKGROUND

Extragenital sites are believed to serve as hidden reservoirs for ongoing transmission of infection. In addition, treatment for rectal Chlamydia infection is different from that of genital Chlamydia infection. Many cases may be missed if only genital testing is performed.

METHODS

Between September 2015 and August 2016, all male and female attendees at an STI clinic of a tertiary care hospital with genital and or extragenital discharge were screened for CT infection. Samples included endocervical swabs in women, urethral swabs and urine samples in men. Rectal and pharyngeal samples were collected wherever indicated.

RESULTS

Of total of 439 samples collected from 417 patients (245 women and 172 men), samples from women had a high positivity rate than men. (13.6% and 11%). High rates of rectal CT was detected nearly 30.43%. All rectal positive cases except one had no concomitant genital infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of extragenital Chlamydia is increasing in men as well as women. What needs to be stressed on is the sexual behaviour of an individual and not the sexual identity. Further studies are needed to help formulate guidelines and recommendations for extragenital screening in a population.

Patterns of Extragenital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Women and Men Who Have Sex With Men Reporting a History of Receptive Anal Intercourse

BACKGROUND

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) in men who have sex with men is risk based. Despite high frequencies of oral and receptive anal intercourse (RAI) among women, extragenital screening is not recommended.

METHODS

Women (n = 175) and men who have sex with men (n = 224) primarily recruited from a sexually transmitted infection clinic reporting a lifetime history of RAI completed a structured questionnaire and clinician-collected swab samples from the rectum, pharynx, vagina (women), and urine (men). CT and GC were detected using 2 commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (Aptima Combo 2; Hologic, Inc, Bedford, MA; Xpert CT/NG, Cepheid Innovation, Sunnyvale, CA).

RESULTS

The median age of the population was 26 years, 62% were white, and 88% were enrolled from a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Men were more likely than women to have GC (22.8% vs. 3.4%) and CT (21.9% vs. 12.6%). In men versus women, GC was detected in 16.5% versus 2.3% of pharyngeal swabs, 11.6% versus 2.3% of rectal swabs, and 5.4% versus 2.9% of urine samples or vaginal swabs. C. trachomatis was detected in 2.2% versus 1.7% of pharyngeal swabs, 17.4% versus 11.4% of rectal swabs, and 4.5% versus 10.3% for urogenital sites in men versus women. Overall 79.6% of CT and 76.5% of GC in men and 18.2% of CT and 16.7% of GC in women were detected only in the pharynx or rectum.

CONCLUSION

Reliance on urogenital screening alone misses most of GC and CT in men and more than 15% of infections in women reporting RAI.