Marijuana Use and Self-reported Quality of Eyesight

Assessing the influence of cannabis and alcohol use on different visual functions: A comparative study

This study aimed to assess and compare the influence of alcohol intake and cannabis smoking on different visual functions. A total of 64 young and healthy volunteers took part in the study. All undertook several randomised experimental sessions in which different visual functions, namely distance stereopsis, retinal straylight, visual discrimination capacity, and contrast sensitivity, were tested. Cannabis smokers (N = 30) took a baseline session and a session after smoking a cannabis cigarette, whereas alcohol users (N = 34) underwent a baseline session, a session after a low alcohol intake (Alcohol 1), and a session after a moderate to high alcohol intake (Alcohol 2). All visual functions were impaired by cannabis and alcohol use, particularly for the Cannabis and Alcohol 2 groups. The deterioration of all visual variables was higher for the Alcohol 2 than for the Alcohol 1 and Cannabis groups, except for retinal straylight, the deterioration of which was equal for the Cannabis group, and distant stereopsis, which was more impaired for the Cannabis group. The Alcohol 2 group experienced the most impairing conditions, although very similar to the cannabis group, and that factors other than the experimental conditions, such as sex and age, also influenced these visual changes. Alcohol and cannabis use clearly impair vision. The deterioration caused by cannabis is similar to, but slightly lower than, that produced by a moderate to high alcohol intake, with the experimental conditions, sex and age all having an impact on the variability of visual deterioration.

Comparison of the effects of alcohol and cannabis on visual function and driving performance. Does the visual impairment affect driving?

BACKGROUND

Alcohol and cannabis are the most widely consumed psychoactive substances worldwide. This study compared the effects of alcohol and cannabis on visual function and driving performance, as well as self-perceived effects. Also, the relationship between visual effects under the influence and driving performance was studied.

METHODS

Sixty-four young drivers, with a history of alcohol and/or cannabis use were included. Of these, 33 were allocated to the alcohol group and 31 to the cannabis group. All participants were evaluated in a baseline session. The alcohol group underwent two sessions: after drinking 300 ml and 450 ml of red wine (A1 and A2). The cannabis group attended one session after smoking cannabis (C). Visual function was evaluated at the contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, and intraocular straylight level. Participants drove a driving simulator. A general score (overall visual score, OVS; overall driving performance score, ODPS) was obtained for both visual functioning and driving performance.

RESULTS

The evaluation of visual function demonstrated a significant impairment in OVS for all conditions studied (A1, p = 0.005; A2, p < 0.001; C, p < 0.001) with respect to the baseline session. General driving performance (ODPS) demonstrated a significant worsening for the A2 condition (p = 0.003). Finally, a significant relationship between driving performance and visual function was found (rho=0.163, p = 0.039 and χ² = 4.801, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis and alcohol use negatively impact visual function. However, driving performance was only significantly affected by the higher alcohol dose. This impairment in visual function was significantly associated with worse driving performance.

Effects of cannabis on visual function and self-perceived visual quality

Cannabis is one of the most used drugs of abuse in the world. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of smoking cannabis on vision and to relate these to those perceived by the user. Thirty-one cannabis users participated in this study. Visual function assessment was carried out in a baseline session as well as after smoking cannabis. We evaluated static visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, accommodative response, straylight, night-vision disturbances (halos) and pupil size. The participants were also divided into two groups depending on whether they perceived their vision to have worsened after smoking cannabis. A logistic regression analysis was employed to identify which visual test could best predict self-perceived visual effects. The study found that smoking cannabis has significant adverse effects on all the visual parameters analyzed (p < 0.05). Self-perceived visual quality results revealed that about two thirds of the sample think that smoking cannabis impairs their vision. Contrast sensitivity, specifically for the spatial frequency 18 cpd, was identified as the only visual parameter significantly associated with self-perceived visual quality (Odds Ratio: 1.135; p = 0.040). Smoking cannabis is associated with negative effects on visual function. Self-perceived visual quality after smoking cannabis could be related to impaired contrast sensitivity.