Differences in Tear Film Biochemistry of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Lens Wearers

Tear biomarkers

An extensive exploration of lacrimal fluid molecular biomarkers in understanding and diagnosing a spectrum of ocular and systemic diseases is presented. The chapter provides an overview of lacrimal fluid composition, elucidating the roles of proteins, lipids, metabolites, and nucleic acids within the tear film. Pooled versus single-tear analysis is discussed to underline the benefits and challenges associated with both approaches, offering insights into optimal strategies for tear sample analysis. Subsequently, an in-depth analysis of tear collection methods is presented, with a focus on Schirmer's test strips and microcapillary tubes methods. Alternative tear collection techniques are also explored, shedding light on their applicability and advantages. Variability factors, including age, sex, and diurnal fluctuations, are examined in the context of their impact on tear biomarker analysis. The main body of the chapter is dedicated to discussing specific biomarkers associated with ocular discomfort and a wide array of ocular diseases. From dry eye disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy to keratoconus, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma, the intricate relationship between molecular biomarkers and these conditions is thoroughly dissected. Expanding beyond ocular pathologies, the chapter explores the applicability of tear biomarkers in diagnosing systemic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and cancer. This broader perspective underscores the potential of lacrimal fluid analysis in offering non-invasive diagnostic tools for conditions with far-reaching implications.

Gene expression changes in conjunctival cells associated with contact lens wear and discomfort

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the differences in the expression of pain-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells among symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers (SCLWs), asymptomatic CL wearers (ACLWs), and non-CL wearers (non-CLWs).

METHODS

For this study, 60 participants (20 non-CLWs, 40 CLWs) were enrolled. The CLW group comprised 20 ACLWs and 20 SCLWs according to the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire short form©. Conjunctival cells were collected using impression cytology, and RNA was isolated and used to determine the expression levels of 85 human genes involved in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. The effects of CL wear and discomfort were evaluated using mixed-effects ANOVA with partially nested fixed-effects model. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to assign biological meaning to sets of differentially expressed genes.

RESULTS

Six genes (CD200, EDN1, GRIN1, PTGS1, P2RX7, and TNF) were significantly upregulated in CLWs compared to non-CLWs. Eleven genes (ADORA1, BDKRB1, CACNA1B, DBH, GRIN1, GRM1, HTR1A, PDYN, PTGS1, P2RX3, and TNF) were downregulated in SCLWs compared to ACLWs. These genes were mainly related to pain, synaptic transmission and signaling, ion transport, calcium transport and concentration, and cell-cell signaling.

CONCLUSIONS

CL wear modified the expression of pain- and inflammation-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells. These changes may be in part, along with other mechanisms, responsible for CL discomfort in SCLWs.

Soft toric contact lens wear improves digital performance and vision-A randomised clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare objective and subjective digital near visual performance and comfort in low to moderate astigmatic participants fitted with toric versus spherical equivalent silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.

METHODS

This was a double-masked, randomised, crossover study. Participants aged 18 to 39 years with astigmatism of -0.75 to -1.50 D were recruited and fitted with toric and spherical contact lenses, in random order. Outcomes were measured at baseline and after 1 week of wear with each contact lens type after the follow-up visits. High- and low-contrast near logMAR visual acuity, automated visual acuity, zoom (%), contrast (%), reading distance (cm), critical print size (logMAR) and reading speed were assessed. Participants also completed the validated Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 (CLDEQ-8) for each correction type.

RESULTS

Twenty-three participants completed the study (74% female, average age 24.4 ± 4.2 years). When participants wore toric contact lenses, near high- and low-contrast visual acuity and automated visual acuity improved by 3-4 letters (all p < 0.03) and participants were able to read faster on an iPad (p = 0.02). Participants were also able to read with 8% less contrast on the iPad with toric lenses (p = 0.01). Participants reported better subjective vision on the overall NAVQ (p = 0.001) and better comfort on the CLDEQ-8 (p = 0.02) with toric lenses. Fewer participants reported difficulty with maintaining focus at near, reading small print, reading labels/instructions, reading the computer display/keyboard and reading post/mail with toric correction.

CONCLUSIONS

Toric contact lenses improve comfort, subjective and objective visual performance with digital devices and other near tasks compared with the spherical equivalent correction in participants with low to moderate astigmatism.

Silicone hydrogel contact lenses retain and document ocular surface lipid mediator profiles

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A leading reason for patients to abandon their contact lenses is discomfort. Mechanisms and biomarkers for lens discomfort remain to be elucidated.

BACKGROUND

Physical stress and tear film interaction are likely factors for lens discomfort. Lipid mediators are generated from polyunsaturated fatty acids. They regulate ocular surface physiology and pathophysiology, are constituents of human tears and may interact with contact lenses. This study set out to determine if hydrogel lenses and silicone hydrogel lenses interact with tear film polyunsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids-derived mediators.

METHODS

In vitro incubations, rat experiments and analysis of worn human lenses assessed polyunsaturated fatty acids and lipid mediator interactions with lenses. Silicone hydrogel and hydrogel lenses were incubated with lipid mediators and polyunsaturated fatty acids up to 24 hours. Rats were fitted with custom silicone hydrogel lenses and basal tears collected. Silicone hydrogel lenses worn for 2 weeks were obtained from 57 human subjects. Tear and lens lipidomes were quantified by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Silicone hydrogel lenses retained polyunsaturated fatty acids and lipid mediators within 15 minutes in vitro. Lenses contained 90% of total polyunsaturated fatty acids and 83-89% of total monohydroxy fatty acids by 12 hours. Retention correlated with polarity of lipid mediators and lipophilic properties of silicone hydrogel lenses. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and lipid mediators such as lipoxygenase- and cyclooxygenase-derived eicosanoids were present in tears and worn lenses from rats. Worn silicone hydrogel lenses from human subjects established robust and lens-type specific lipidomes with high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, lipoxygenase-pathway markers and subject-specific differences in lipoxin A₄ and leukotriene B₄.

CONCLUSION

Worn silicone hydrogel lenses rapidly retain and accumulate tear polyunsaturated fatty acids and lipid mediators. Marked subject and lens type differences in the lipidome may document changes in ocular surface physiology, cell activation or infection that are associated with lens wear. If contact lens discomfort and adverse events induce specific tear and lens fatty acid and lipid mediator profiles warrants further studies.

Inflammatory proteins associated with contact lens-related dry eye

PURPOSE

To evaluate the levels and regulation of tear film inflammatory proteins in contact lens-related dry eye (CLDE).

METHODS

One hundred healthy, daily wear (non-overnight), experienced soft contact lens wearers were classified into normal (n = 50) and CLDE (n = 50) groups based on Contact Lens and Dry Eye Questionnaire scores, tear break-up times, and comfort (a two-hour difference between total and comfortable daily lens wear hours). Tear samples (up to 5 μL) were collected by capillary extraction from the inferior meniscus of each eye, and pooled tear samples (10 per group) were tested using a customized Quantibody array. Mann Whitney tests with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure with a 5% false discovery rate were used to compare the normal and CLDE groups.

RESULTS

Relative to the normal group, the CLDE group showed a significantly increased tear concentration of several inflammatory mediators, including interleukin (IL)-7 (p = 0.001), IL-8 (p = 0.001), IL-13 (p = 0.001), IL-15 (p = 0.001), IL-12 p70 (p = 0.002), growth-related oncogene-alpha/ chemokine (CXC motif) ligand 1 (p = 0.003), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (p = 0.005), IL-11 (p = 0.008), epidermal growth factor receptor (p = 0.01), IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA) (p = 0.013), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (p = 0.013), Eotaxin/CC motif chemokine ligand 11 (CCL11) (p = 0.016), and IL-2 (p = 0.016). The following cytokines were increased three-fold or more in the CLDE group: IL-13 (p = 0.001), Eotaxin/CCL11 (p = 0.016), and IL-1RA (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Several inflammatory markers, including interleukins, were increased in tears of subjects with CLDE. These results support a growing body of evidence that suggests a potential role of inflammation in CLDE.

Inflammatory status predicts contact lens discomfort under adverse environmental conditions

PURPOSE

To characterize and predict the clinical and tear molecular response of contact lens (CL) wearers exposed to a controlled adverse desiccating environment (CADE).

METHODS

Objective and subjective variables and tear cytokine levels were evaluated of monthly silicone hydrogel CL wearers pre- and post-90 min of CADE exposure. Unsupervised hierarchical agglomerative clustering based on relative change from baseline values was used to identify response profiles (clusters). A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify cluster membership predictors.

RESULTS

Forty-seven CL wearers were divided into 3 clusters having similar age (mean: 27.7 ± 7.7 years) and sex distribution. All of them showed a significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in limbal hyperemia and staining after CADE exposure. Additionally, Cluster-1 (n = 22, 46.8%) membership was characterized by a significant (p ≤ 0.05) higher worsening of corneal and limbal staining, increased CL wear symptoms, and reduced epidermal-growth-factor and increased interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-6 tear levels. Cluster-2 (n = 22, 46.8%) showed no changes (p > 0.05) in symptoms after CADE; however, their IL-12p70, monocyte-chemoattractant-protein-1 and regulated-on-activation, normal-T-cell-expressed-and-secreted (RANTES) post-exposure tear levels significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased. Finally, Cluster-3 (n = 3, 6.4%) mainly showed significant higher blink rate (78.1 ± 21.7) during CADE. Corneal staining and tear IL-12p70 levels were identified as Cluster-1 membership predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of silicone hydrogel CL wearers exposed to CADE showed a worsening of the ocular surface integrity and an upregulated tear inflammatory status. However, only half of them reported worsening of CL wear symptoms. These CL wearers were detected based on corneal integrity and tear inflammatory status. These findings can help reduce CL wear discontinuation and drop out.

Tear Inflammatory Molecules in Contact Lens Wearers: A Literature Review

Background:

Numerous studies have analysed the effect of using different Contact Lenses (CLs) or care solutions, and suffering discomfort or diseases associated with CL wear on the inflammatory mediator release into the tears.

Objective:

To summarize the published data on tear inflammatory molecules related to CL use.

Methods:

A PubMed-NCBI search has been conducted and those publications which carried out original investigations including the analysis of tear inflammatory mediators in CL wearers were selected.

Results:

Forty-three articles, from 1990 to 2019, have been included. Wearing hydrogel CLs, rigid gas permeable CLs, and special designs for irregular corneas in keratoconus patients (CLs with keratoconic design, hybrid CLs, piggyback fit, and scleral CLs) have been reported to alter the concentration of several molecules in tears. Moreover, there seems to be an effect of the wearing time and schedule, CL materials and designs, and care solutions used. Regarding CL discomfort, its relation with inflammatory mediators is not clear. However, some diseases associated to CL wear, such as giant papillary conjunctivitis, CL induced acute red eye, CL induced peripheral ulcer, and acanthamoeba keratitis have been related to the release of certain inflammatory mediators, which may serve as potential biomarkers.

Conclusion:

There is evidence suggesting that different aspects of CL wear alter the inflammatory mediator profile in tears, which may indicate an inflammatory state of the lacrimal functional unit. However, more studies need to be carried out to better understand how this inflammatory process works and its repercussion on the different aspects of CL wear.

Conjunctival Neuropathic and Inflammatory Pain-Related Gene Expression with Contact Lens Wear and Discomfort

Purpose: To identify alterations in neuropathic and inflammatory pain gene expression associated with contact lens (CL) wear and CL discomfort (CLD).Methods: Eight non-wearers, eight asymptomatic CL wearers (CLWs) and eight symptomatic CLWs were included. Conjunctival cells were collected by impression cytology and the mRNA expression levels of 85 genes were analyzed. Differentially expressed genes between non-wearers and CLWs and between asymptomatic and symptomatic CLWs were analyzed. An enrichment analysis was also performed.Results: Twelve genes were upregulated (including IL10, PDYN and PENK) and 28 downregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) in CLWs (p ≤ 0.050). Eleven genes were upregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) and nine downregulated (PDYN and PENK) in symptomatic CLWs (p ≤ 0.035). Enriched overrepresented terms were related to pain, neuronal transmission and inflammation.Conclusion: Contact lens wear might produce a desensitization-like mechanism responsible for comfortable CL wear. A malfunction of this mechanism might contribute to CLD.

Substance P Level in Tears as a Potential Biomarker for Contact Lens Discomfort

Purpose: To analyze the effects of contact lens (CL) wear, time of the day, and CL discomfort (CLD) on clinical signs, tear inflammatory mediators and substance P.Methods: Thirty symptomatic and 30 asymptomatic CL wearers attended two visits (morning and afternoon) on two days (non-CL and CL wearing days). Comfort, meniscus area, noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), tear collection, hyperemia, lid parallel conjunctival folds, fluorescein staining, and sensitivity were performed. The tear levels of 23 inflammatory mediators and substance P were measured.Results: Comfort, meniscus area, NIBUT, and MMP-9 were lower while conjunctival staining and EGF higher (p ≤ 0.015) on the CL wearing day. Comfort, IL-8/CXCL8, and VEGF were lower while EGF, IP-10/CXCL10, and MCP-1/CCL2 higher (p ≤ 0.047) in the afternoon. Comfort was lower and substance P higher (p ≤ 0.006) in symptomatic wearers.Conclusion: Substance P may be implicated in CLD etiology; its role and potential application as a biomarker should be further studied.

Tear film, contact lenses and tear biomarkers

This article summarises research undertaken since 1993 in the Willcox laboratory at the University of New South Wales, Sydney on the tear film, its interactions with contact lenses, and the use of tears as a source of biomarkers for ocular and non-ocular diseases. The proteome, lipidome and glycome of tears all contribute to important aspects of the tear film, including its structure, its ability to defend the ocular surface against microbes and to help heal ocular surface injuries. The tear film interacts with contact lenses in vivo and interactions between tears and lenses can affect the biocompatibility of lenses, and may be important in mediating discomfort responses during lens wear. Suggestions are made for follow-up research.