Comparison of Two Thermal Pulsation Systems in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized, Multicenter Study

Safety and Efficacy of Dry Eye Intelligent Therapeutic Device in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Rabbits

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of the dry eye intelligent therapeutic device in rabbits with meibomian gland dysfunction.

METHODS

The meibomian gland dysfunction-afflicted rabbits were subjected to treatment using the dry eye intelligent therapeutic device. Various parameters, including eyelid margin, meibomian gland opening, redness, meibomian gland area, keratoconjunctival fluorescence staining, and intraocular pressure, were examined and analyzed using an ocular surface comprehensive examination instrument, slit lamp, and tonometer at corresponding times points. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed to examine the mucosal epithelium and meibomian gland.

RESULTS

In this study, eyelid margin congestion and meibomian gland opening obstruction were significantly improved after 3 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment, respectively (p < .01, p < .05). The treatment group showed a significant increase in tear meniscus height after 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment (p < .001, p < .01, p < .05). No significant changes were noted in meibomian gland area, redness, intraocular pressure, and keratoconjunctival fluorescence staining of rabbits before and after treatment. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed a complete structure of mucosal epithelium and meibomian gland in the treatment group and that the expansion of the blocked meibomian gland duct was reduced.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of the dry eye intelligent therapeutic device in treating meibomian gland dysfunction-afflicted rabbits exhibits potential promising safety, efficacy, and overall benefits, thereby offering a novel alternative for managing meibomian gland dysfunction patients in clinical settings.

LipiFlow for the treatment of dry eye disease

BACKGROUND

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the most common underlying cause of dry eye disease (DED). MGD leads to pathological alteration of the composition or quantity of meibum, or both, which subsequently results in tear evaporation and the typical signs and symptoms associated with DED. The LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System (LipiFlow) is a medical device used to treat MGD in office; however, it is unclear if LipiFlow can outperform other DED treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of LipiFlow for treating DED signs and symptoms and the safety of LipiFlow compared with sham or other available treatments for MGD in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Eyes and Vision Information Specialist searched the electronic databases for randomized controlled trials. There were no restrictions on language or date of publication. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, including the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 6), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database), ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) electronic databases. We also examined the reference lists of identified trials, review articles, and guidelines for information about relevant trials that may not have been identified by our search strategy. We contacted investigators regarding ongoing trials. The last database search was performed on 24 October 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies conducted in adults (over 18 years of age) with DED or MGD as defined by the primary trial investigators. We imposed no restrictions on race, ethnicity, or sex. We considered trials involving contact lens wearers if they were equally represented between groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We applied standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 trials that randomized a total of 1155 participants (28 to 236 participants randomized per study). Six trials were conducted in the USA, three in China, two in Thailand, one in France, and one in Italy. Eight trials were of single-center design, while four trials were of multicenter design; one trial did not report the number of participating centers. Study characteristics The study population of the included trials was 66% female (range 48% to 80%), with an age range of 19 to 86 years. LipiFlow, used as a stand-alone intervention, was compared with basic warm compresses in five studies, thermostatic device in five studies, oral intervention in one trial, and topical dry eye medications in one trial. LipiFlow was also evaluated together with eyelid hygiene product versus eyelid hygiene products alone in one trial. Findings Five trials compared LipiFlow with a basic warm compress applied for varying durations and frequencies during the trial period; only one of these trials combined a warm compress with eyelid massage. Analyzing symptom scores by different questionnaires (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI] and Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness [SPEED]) yielded conflicting evidence of a difference in symptoms between LipiFlow and basic warm compresses after four weeks. There was no evidence of a difference in meibomian gland expression, meibum quality, or tear breakup time when comparing LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Another five trials compared LipiFlow with thermostatic devices. Analysis of symptom scores at four weeks showed that thermostatic devices had reduced OSDI scores by a mean difference (MD) of 4.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 7.95; I2 = 0, P = 0.007; 553 participants; very low certainty evidence) as compared with LipiFlow. When we compared LipiFlow plus eyelid hygiene with eyelid hygiene alone, there was no evidence of difference in signs or symptoms at any time point evaluated. Only one trial compared LipiFlow with a topical DED medication (lifitegrast 5%). The single-trial estimate suggested that 5% lifitegrast may increase meibomian gland expression scores compared with LipiFlow at day 42 (MD -1.21, 95% CI -2.37 to -0.05; 50 participants; low certainty evidence) by using a meibomian gland expression scale of 0 to 8. One trial compared LipiFlow with an oral intervention (doxycycline), finding that LipiFlow may result in significantly better SPEED scores than doxycycline at three months (MD -4.00, 95% CI -7.33 to -0.67; 24 participants; very low certainty evidence). No other significant differences in signs or symptoms were found between LipiFlow and doxycycline at three months. We did not find any other statistically significant differences in symptoms or signs for any other analysis performed in this review at the one- to four-week time point. Adverse events No trial reported any intervention-related, vision-threatening adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LipiFlow performs similarly to other commonly used DED treatments with regard to DED signs and symptoms. The best available evidence was deemed to have a high level of bias, leading to low or very low certainty evidence. Additional research with adequate masking, a standardized testing methodology, and a sample representative of the MGD population is therefore needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn regarding comparative benefits and harms.

Multi-symptom Relief with Propylene Glycol-Hydroxypropyl-Guar Nanoemulsion Lubricant Eye Drops in Subjects with Dry Eye Disease: A Post-Marketing Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to evaluate multi-symptom relief of dry eye manifestations with the use of propylene glycol-hydroxypropyl-guar (PG-HPG) nanoemulsion lubricant eye drops, among subjects with dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

This was a post-marketing, prospective, single-arm study conducted in the USA. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years, with tear breakup time (TBUT) ≤ 10 s for both eyes, dry eye questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5) "watery eyes" symptom score 1-4, symptoms of burning/stinging, sore and tired eyes as determined by impact of dry eye on everyday living-symptom bother (IDEEL-SB) questionnaire, and IDEEL-SB score 16-65 were included. Subjects were required to complete IDEEL-SB and DEQ-5 at days 0, 14 ± 2, and 28 ± 2, and self-administer one drop of PG-HPG four times daily for 28 ± 2 days. Primary endpoints were change from baseline at day 28 in symptoms of sore, stinging/burning, and tired eyes on IDEEL-SB; and symptom of watery eyes on DEQ-5. Other endpoints evaluated were corneal staining and TBUT at baseline and day 28 ± 2; symptom relief (5-point Likert scale) at day 28 ± 2, and safety.

RESULTS

Of 119 subjects enrolled, 95 completed the study (mean ± SD age 61.2 ± 13.0 years; female 69.5%). Mean IDEEL-SB scores reduced significantly from baseline at day 28 for symptoms of aching/sore eyes (change from baseline - 1.0 ± 1.1), burning/stinging eyes (change from baseline - 1.1 ± 0.9), and tired eyes (change from baseline - 1.1 ± 1.0) (all p < 0.0001). Mean DEQ-5 score for watery eye symptoms significantly reduced from baseline at day 28 (change from baseline - 0.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001). Corneal staining at day 28 was comparable to baseline. TBUT improved from baseline to day 28. On a Likert scale, more than 50% of subjects reported relief from symptoms of sore, stinging, and burning eyes. Three (3.1%) subjects reported treatment-emergent adverse events (non-ocular).

CONCLUSIONS

PG-HPG nanoemulsion lubricant eye drops significantly improved multiple dry eye symptoms in subjects with DED over 28 days, with no new safety concerns.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT05056155.

Update on Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Although the ultimate goal of dry eye disease (DED) management is to restore the ocular surface and tear film homeostasis and address any accompanying symptoms, addressing this is not an easy task. Despite the wide range of current treatment modalities targeting multiple aspects of DED, the available DED management literature is quite heterogeneous, rendering evaluation or comparison of treatment outcomes hard or almost impossible. There is still a shortage of well-designed, large-scale, nonsponsored, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of many targeted therapies individually or used in combination, in the treatment of identified subgroups of patients with DED. This review focuses on the treatment modalities in DED management and aims to reveal the current evidence available as deduced from the outcomes of RCTs.

Dry Eye Disease Associated with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Focus on Tear Film Characteristics and the Therapeutic Landscape

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is highly prevalent and is the leading cause of evaporative dry eye disease (DED). MGD is characterized by a reduction in meibum secretion and/or a change in meibum composition that results in the disruption of the tear film lipid layer and an increase in the tear film evaporation rate. Excessive evaporation causes tear film instability, desiccation, tear hyperosmolarity, inflammation, and apoptosis of ocular surface cells, resulting in a continuous cycle of DED. The primary treatment goal for DED associated with MGD is to restore the tear film lipid layer and decrease evaporation, thereby reducing ocular signs and symptoms. The management of MGD includes home care options (eyelid hygiene, warming eye masks, ocular lubricants) and office-based treatments (manual expression, microblepharoexfoliation, thermal pulsation, intense pulsed light, intraductal probing). Topical ophthalmic prescription medications attempt to alter various factors that may contribute to DED (e.g., inflammation, bacterial growth, inadequate tear production). In this review, clinical evidence regarding available treatments and emerging therapies from randomized studies in patients with DED associated with MGD is summarized. Although some treatment modalities have been evaluated specifically for DED patients with MGD, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy and safety in this patient population. Currently, there are no approved prescription pharmacologic treatments specifically indicated for DED associated with MGD, and those medications approved for the treatment of DED do not target the key driver of the disease (i.e., excessive evaporation). NOV03 (perfluorohexyloctane; under review with the US Food and Drug Administration) is the most advanced emerging therapy for DED associated with MGD and has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both signs and symptoms in randomized controlled trials. Development of novel pharmacotherapies will improve therapeutic options and allow for a more individualized approach for patients with DED associated with MGD.

Systane iLux Thermal Pulsation System in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a 12-Month, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Purpose

This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of Systane iLux, a thermal pulsation device, in patients with MGD, over 12 months post-single treatment.

Methods

This is a post-hoc analysis of a previous prospective, assessor-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study (NCT03956225) that compared the effectiveness and safety of iLux with LipiFlow in subjects with MGD. The original study included subjects with meibomian gland score (MGS) ≤12 in lower eyelids, Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life-Symptom Bother (IDEEL-SB) module score &gt;16, and non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) &lt;10 seconds. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive a single bilateral treatment of iLux or LipiFlow. In this post-hoc analysis, mean changes in MGS, NITBUT (first break-up; seconds), IDEEL-SB module score, and corneal staining, from baseline to 12 months were analyzed post-single treatment with iLux.

Results

Data from 119 patients (n=238 eyes) treated with iLux were analyzed. The mean±SD age of the subjects was 58.4±13.4 years, with majority being female (79.0%). MGS (mean±SD) for both eyes improved significantly from baseline to 12 months (OD [baseline: 6.9±3.69; month 12: 22.8±11.31; change: 15.9±11.57, p&lt;0.0001]; OS [baseline: 6.4±3.66; month 12: 23.0±11.33; change: 16.7±11.40, p&lt;0.0001]). Similarly, significant improvements were observed in NITBUT (OD [baseline: 5.2±1.97; month 12: 7.0±3.68; change: 1.9±3.69, p&lt;0.0001]; OS [baseline: 5.6±1.96; month 12: 7.9±4.58; change: 2.3±4.59, p&lt;0.0001]) and IDEEL-SB score (p&lt;0.0001). Corneal staining reduced significantly from baseline to 12 months (OD [baseline: 2.1±2.96; month 12: 0.7±1.56; change: -1.4±2.65, p&lt;0.0001]; OS [baseline: 2.1±2.94; month 12: 0.7±1.44; change: -1.4±2.75, p&lt;0.0001]). Improvements in MGS, NITBUT, IDEEL-SB module score, and corneal staining were seen as early as week 2, and at months 1, 3, 6, and 9 (all p&lt;0.001).

Conclusion

A single treatment with iLux significantly improved clinical parameters of MGS, NITBUT, and corneal staining, and patient-reported symptom assessment with IDEEL-SB in patients with MGD over 12 months.