Impact of Lens Case Hygiene Guidelines on Contact Lens Case Contamination

Microbial Contamination in Contact Lenses, Lens Care Solutions, and Accessories Among Asymptomatic Soft Contact Lens Users

Objective This study aimed to evaluate microbial contamination of contact lenses (CL) and their accessories among asymptomatic lens users and identify behavioral risk factors that might exacerbate the said contamination. Methodology Ninety-five asymptomatic soft CL users were recruited. In total, 380 samples were collected from the inner surface of lenses, the base of lens cases, the tip of the multipurpose solution bottle, and the solution itself. All swabs with samples were inoculated onto Columbia 5% sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar, Pseudomonas agar with cetrimide, and Sabouraud dextrose agar. Blood agar, MacConkey agar, and Pseudomonas agar with cetrimide were incubated at 37 °C for 24-48 hours. Fungal growth was investigated on Sabouraud dextrose agar, incubated at 25 °C, and examined daily for three weeks. Microscopic examination, culture-based methods, and biochemical tests were used to identify isolated microorganisms. A self-administered questionnaire on compliance with care and hygiene procedures was completed by each participant. Results The overall microbial contamination of tested samples was 38.7%. The most frequently contaminated items were lens cases (59, 62.1%), followed by bottles (44, 46.3%) and lenses (35, 36.8%). Meanwhile, the lowest incidence of contamination was seen in lens multipurpose solutions (9, 9.5%). The predominant microorganisms recovered were Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) (94, 64%) and Gram-positive rods (29, 19.7%). Other identified potential pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (11, 7.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5, 3.4%), Escherichia coli (1, 0.7%), and Candida albicans (2, 1.4%). The questionnaire revealed that contact lens users aged 18 to 20 showed a lack of compliance with proper hygienic care for contact lens maintenance. Risk factors such as male gender, smoking, showering, or swimming while wearing CL were related to microbiological contamination in at least one of the samples (P > 0.05). Conclusions The highest degree of contamination with highly virulent pathogens was determined in lens cases owing to insufficient lens care practices among study participants. Noncompliance with the lens cleaning procedures can lead to microbial colonization of the lens and its accessories, prompting inflammatory events in the eyes in the future.

Are Patients Sufficiently Informed about Contact Lens Wear and Care?

SIGNIFICANCE

Frequent and effective patient-practitioner communication is essential to ensure that instructions regarding contact lens use, care, and maintenance are understood and followed. Given the relevance of good patient compliance, the responsibility of practitioners to provide adequate information may not be neglected.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the content and type of information licensed optometrists in Spain provide their patients during the first contact lens fitting and at follow-up visits.

METHODS

A self-reported ad hoc survey was distributed to licensed optometrists in Spain to investigate, among other factors, whether practitioners provided information on several aspects of contact lens use and maintenance, how was this information provided, and whether in-office practical demonstrations were conducted at all contact lens appointments.

RESULTS

Respondents of 321 surveys had a median of 20 years of contact lens fitting experience and worked on independent practices (67.6%), and national (29.0%) and regional chains (3.4%). Type of practice influenced continuous education habits ( P = .03). Overall, 28.0% of participants did not always instruct patients on the need to rub contact lenses, 34.3% did not always address contact lens replacement, and 6.8% did not always explain storage case hygiene and replacement. At the follow-up visit, only 8.4% of respondents asked their patients to demonstrate their care routines. Information was mostly oral (48.6%) or oral and written (43.0%). Contact lens-related complications were reported more frequently by participants with less continuous education training ( P = .01), by those not always recommending rubbing ( P = .002), and by those not providing written information about storage case hygiene and replacement ( P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-practitioner communication was good, albeit several areas were identified where information was insufficient or not provided in a correct and timely format. Precise, written information on rubbing and storage case hygiene and replacement may improve compliance and assist in avoiding complications and dropout.

A novel quantitative evaluation of deposits adhered to worn orthokeratology contact lenses

PURPOSE

Total deposition and deposition along the reverse curve of heavily deposited worn orthokeratology (OK) lenses were quantitatively evaluated using two novel imaging methods. In addition, the cleaning efficacies of a contact lens cleaning solution for daily use and an intensive cleaner and protein remover solution were evaluated using the same two methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

METHODS

Twenty-six worn reverse-geometry OK lenses (MY Emerald, Technopia) were photographed for use in three experiments: (1) total deposition was assessed before and after cleaning with two cleaning solutions; (2) in addition to assessing total lens deposition, the feasibility of measuring the thickness of lens deposits along the reverse curve was assessed; and (3) after confirming it was possible to assess the thickness of lens deposits, the thickness of deposits was assessed before and after cleaning with a daily contact lens cleaning solution (O₂ Care^®, Menicon Co., Ltd.) and an intensive cleaner and protein remover (Progent^®, Menicon Co., Ltd.). Total lens deposition was assessed as the total volume of cloudiness over the lens surface in terms of volume per unit pixel. Cross-sectional images were taken from worn OK lenses to assess the thickness of lens deposits on the reverse curve as the area of deposits/horizontal length.

RESULTS

Significant differences in total deposition were found between the three cleaning conditions for the twenty worn OK lenses (mean total deposition ± SD for pre-cleaning = 0.209 ± 0.076; post-daily cleaning = 0.124 ± 0.078; and post-intensive cleaning = 0.045 ± 0.046) (p < 0.001). Mean total deposition and thickness of the deposits along the reverse curve for the three lenses from the second experiment were 0.310 and 6.0 mm, respectively. The mean thicknesses of lens deposits found in the third experiment under the 3 conditions were as follows: pre-cleaning = 3.4 µm; post-daily cleaning = 2.3 µm; and post-intensive cleaning = 0.0 µm.

CONCLUSION

The two novel imaging methods used in this study detected significant amounts of deposits attached to worn OK lenses and were sensitive enough to detect a reduction in deposition following the use of the two cleaning solutions tested. Furthermore, these methods could visualize and quantify the thickness of lens deposits along the reverse curve.

Effect of Hygiene Procedures on Lens Case Contamination with Povidone-Iodine or Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions

SIGNIFICANCE

A multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS), which contains povidone-iodine (PI) as a disinfectant, has high disinfecting efficacy not only on planktonic bacterium but also on the case biofilms. The addition of case hygiene practice removed more bacteria from cases than MPDS alone.

PURPOSE

This study compared the ability of two MPDSs, one containing PI and another containing polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyquaternium, to reduce bacterial numbers in solution or adhered to the cases following case hygiene procedures.

METHODS

Bacterial strains (Delftia acidovorans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis) were exposed to the MPDSs for the recommended disinfection times, and the viable number evaluated according to ISO 14729. Cases were inoculated with bacterial strains and incubated for 24 hours to allow for biofilm formation. Cases were disinfected with both disinfecting solutions for 4 hours and rinsed, followed by recapping or air-drying, or tissue-wiping and air-drying for 18 hours. The number of survivors was counted using standard culture techniques.

RESULTS

Both products exceeded the recommended 3-log reduction against planktonic bacteria. Regarding biofilm, after rinsing and recapping wet, the numbers of D. acidovorans (mean difference [95% confidence interval] log10 colony-forming units per case, -2.9 [0.8 to -4.6], P < .01), P. aeruginosa (-2.0 [0.5 to -3.1], P < .01), S. marcescens (-1.7 [0.8 to -3.5], P < .05), and S. epidermidis (-2.1 [0.6 to -3.5], P < .05) in PI cases were significantly lower than in the dual-disinfectant MPDS storage cases. After air-drying, the PI storage cases had significantly lower numbers of S. maltophilia (-2.6 [0.6 to -4.0], P < .01), D. acidovorans (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.3], P < .05), and S. aureus (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.1], P < .05). The addition of tissue-wiping reduced the bacterial numbers in the MPDS storage cases to levels in the PI storage cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Contact lens users should be recommended to tissue-wipe and air-dry their lens storage cases after disinfection with regular MPDS.

CLEAR - Evidence-based contact lens practice

Evidence-based contact lens -->practice involves finding, appraising and applying research findings as the basis for patient management decisions. These decisions should be informed by the strength of the research study designs that address the question, as well as by the experience of the practitioner and the preferences and environment of the patient. This reports reviews and summarises the published research evidence that is available to inform soft and rigid contact lens history and symptoms taking, anterior eye health examination (including the optimised use of ophthalmic dyes, grading scales, imaging techniques and lid eversion), considerations for contact lens selection (including the ocular surface measurements required to select the most appropriate lens parameter, lens modality and material selection), evaluation of lens fit, prescribing (teaching self-application and removal, adaptation, care regimen and cleaning instructions, as well as -->minimising risks of lens wear through encouraging compliance) and an aftercare routine.

The impact of patient behaviour and care system compliance on reusable soft contact lens complications

Reusable soft daily wear contact lenses (CLs) remain popular and were fit to just over half of all wearers in the most recent international CL prescribing survey. Unlike daily disposable CLs, reusables require cleaning and disinfecting after every use, along with storage in a CL case. These additional requirements add a number of steps to the daily wear and care routine, increasing the opportunities for CL wearers to exhibit non-compliant behaviour. The impact of non-compliance ranges from poor lens comfort through to potentially sight-threatening infective keratitis. The coronavirus pandemic has refocused the profession on the importance of hand hygiene in particular, and the need for promoting safe CL wear in general. This review summarises typical non-compliant behaviour related to reusable CLs, and examines strategies and opportunities to better support wearers. Patient education has a central role in encouraging compliant behaviour, although patient recall of information is low, and personal belief systems may result in continuation of non-compliant behaviour despite awareness of the risks. CL care solutions are required for the daily disinfection of lenses, however misuse of multipurpose solutions (MPS) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-based care systems can challenge their ability to be fully efficacious. Standard efficacy testing is reviewed, with consideration of how well current protocols model real-world use of CL solutions. Although some recommendations are in place for the inclusion of additional variables such as lens cases, CL materials, organic soil and efficacy against Acanthamoeba, opportunity still exists to reevaluate global standards to ensure consistency of testing in all markets. Finally, potential future innovations are discussed which may further support increased safety in reusable lens wear through novel antimicrobial additions to both CL materials and cases.

Development of a contact Lens risk survey

PURPOSE

To describe the development and report psychometric properties of the Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS) to identify patients at risk for soft contact lens-related complications.

METHODS

Psychometric properties of the CLRS, a web-based survey with branching logic, were determined using data from 5 multi-site fieldings (n = 1059), including re-fielding to sub groups. Responses from participants with and without an active red eye were used to identify risk factors of a red eye event and calculate an overall risk score. A 6th fielding of the CLRS (n = 171) was used to assess discriminate validity.

RESULTS

Participants needed 11-12 min to complete the survey with a negligible difference by age. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.70) for 3 of the 5 constructs identified by factor analysis. Twelve of the 17 survey items exhibited excellent within-subject repeatability (Kappa ≥ 0.61). Between-subject agreement, assessed in 18-25 year olds, was high for the majority of items, suggesting good generalizability across different populations of SCL wearers. The ability of the model using individual items of the CLRS to discriminate Controls and participants with a red eye was good with an area under the curve of 0.779.

CONCLUSION

The CLRS tool is a repeatable and valid instrument to standardize documentation of demographic, behavior, and exposure factors which appear to drive the greatest risk of a contact lens related red eye event.

Multicenter Testing of a Risk Assessment Survey for Soft Contact Lens Wearers With Adverse Events: A Contact Lens Assessment in Youth Study

PURPOSE

To test the ability of responses to the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS) to differentiate behaviors among participants with serious and significant (S&S) contact lens-related corneal inflammatory events, those with other events (non-S&S), and healthy controls matched for age, gender, and soft contact lens (SCL) wear frequency.

METHODS

The CLRS was self-administered electronically to SCL wearers presenting for acute clinical care at 11 clinical sites. Each participant completed the CLRS before their examination. The clinician, masked to CLRS responses, submitted a diagnosis for each participant that was used to classify the event as S&S or non-S&S. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare responses.

RESULTS

Comparison of responses from 96 participants with S&S, 68 with non-S&S, and 207 controls showed that patients with S&S were more likely (always or fairly often) to report overnight wear versus patients with non-S&S (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-18.7) and versus controls (aOR, 5.8; CI, 2.2-15.2). Patients with S&S were more likely to purchase SCLs on the internet versus non-S&S (aOR, 4.9; CI, 1.6-15.1) and versus controls (aOR, 2.8; CI, 1.4-5.9). The use of two-week replacement lenses compared with daily disposables was significantly higher among patients with S&S than those with non-S&S (aOR, 4.3; CI, 1.5-12.0). Patients with S&S were less likely to regularly discard leftover solution compared with controls (aOR, 2.5; CI, 1.1-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The CLRS is a clinical survey tool that can be used to identify risky behaviors and exposures directly associated with an increased risk of S&S events.

Fungal isolation from disinfectant solutions of contact lens storage cases among asymptomatic users

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence of fungal contamination of store disinfectant solutions contained in contact lens storage cases belonging to asymptomatic contact lens users.

METHODS

Asymptomatic contact lens users were asked to bring their storage cases, lenses included, without having opened the lid of the cup after placing lenses inside. The following information was recorded: age, sex, type of refractive error, contact lens material, schedule of wear, and brand of disinfectant solution. Included subjects had to comply with lens handling, cleaning, and replacement instructions given by the manufacturer or their attending optometrist. One sample per cup of contact lens case was collected using a sterile syringe. Samples were cultured on proper media for 96 hr at 35°C. Fungi were identified to species level by standard methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 216 samples were collected from 117 contact lens storage cases. All participants were using monthly disposable hydrogel lenses on a daily wear basis. Seven fungal species were isolated from 15 specimens (6.9%) collected from 12 storage cases (10.2%). These included one Fusarium solani, four Aspergillus niger, two Aspergillus fumigatus, five Candida parapsilosis, one Candida tropicalis, one Rhodotorula rubra, and one F. solani in combination with Candida guilliermondii. Disinfectant solutions containing hydrogen peroxide were found to be less effective than various alternative solutions in eliminating fungal species.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that even when contact lens users report compliance for handling, cleaning, and replacement according to the manufacturer's instructions, the potential risk of contact lens-related fungal keratitis still remains.

Microbial contamination of contact lens care accessories and compliance with care regimens in Nepal

PURPOSE

To determine the rates of microbial contamination and identify contaminants associated with contact lens (CL) care accessories. To investigate self-reported compliance levels with care of CL accessories and its association with contamination level.

METHODS

A total of 46 CL cases and care solutions from asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers were collected. Samples from the CL cases and care solutions were cultured for microbiological identification and enumeration. A questionnaire regarding compliance to care and hygiene procedures were administered to each subject on their visit.

RESULTS

The percentage of microbial contamination for CL cases and care solutions was 50% and 10.9%, respectively. All the contaminants were bacterial. Staphylococcus aureus (37.0%, 17 of 46 cases) and Escherichia coli (8.7%, 4 of 46 cases) were the most common microorganisms detected in CL cases. In care solutions, S. aureus (8.7%, 4 of 46 samples), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2.2%, 1 of 46 samples) were common contaminants. CL cases and care solutions that were used for <3 months were significantly less contaminated than those used for >3 months (10.9% versus 39.1%, p<0.05). Polyquad and Aldox based MPS solution showed no contamination. Subjects with medium or low compliance had highly significant rates of contaminations both in CL cases and solutions than for subjects with high compliance (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nepalese Soft CL wearers are at high risk of developing ocular complications due to high CL case and solution contamination. Frequent replacement of CL cases and solutions, as well as good compliance is recommended to reduce risk of contamination.