Ki67 Immunohistochemistry Quantification in Breast Carcinoma: A Comparison of Visual Estimation, Counting, and ImmunoRatio

Early Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Integrating Histopathology with Artificial Intelligence

Effective risk assessment in early breast cancer is essential for informed clinical decision-making, yet consensus on defining risk categories remains challenging. This paper explores evolving approaches in risk stratification, encompassing histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biomarkers alongside cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Leveraging machine learning, deep learning, and convolutional neural networks, AI is reshaping predictive algorithms for recurrence risk, thereby revolutionizing diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Beyond detection, AI applications extend to histological subtyping, grading, lymph node assessment, and molecular feature identification, fostering personalized therapy decisions. With rising cancer rates, it is crucial to implement AI to accelerate breakthroughs in clinical practice, benefiting both patients and healthcare providers. However, it is important to recognize that while AI offers powerful automation and analysis tools, it lacks the nuanced understanding, clinical context, and ethical considerations inherent to human pathologists in patient care. Hence, the successful integration of AI into clinical practice demands collaborative efforts between medical experts and computational pathologists to optimize patient outcomes.

Clinical and Analytical Validation of Two Methods for Ki-67 Scoring in Formalin Fixed and Paraffin Embedded Tissue Sections of Early Breast Cancer

Proliferation determined by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry has been proposed as a useful prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer. However, the clinical validity of Ki-67 is questionable. In this study, Ki-67 was retrospectively evaluated by three pathologists using two methods: a visual assessment of the entire slide and a quantitative assessment of the tumour margin in 411 early-stage breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 26.8 years. We found excellent agreement between the three pathologists for both methods. The risk of recurrence for Ki-67 was time-dependent, as the high proliferation group (Ki-67 ≥ 30%) had a higher risk of recurrence initially, but after 4.5 years the risk was higher in the low proliferation group. In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients, the intermediate Ki-67 group initially followed the high Ki-67 group, but eventually followed the low Ki-67 group. ER-positive pN0-1 patients with intermediate Ki-67 treated with endocrine therapy alone had a similar outcome to patients treated with chemotherapy. A cut-off value of 20% appeared to be most appropriate for distinguishing between the high and low Ki-67 groups. To summarize, a simple visual whole slide Ki-67 assessment turned out to be a reliable method for clinical decision-making in early breast cancer patients. We confirmed Ki-67 as an important prognostic and predictive biomarker.

AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer

The Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) guides treatment decisions in breast cancer but suffers from poor inter-rater reproducibility. Although AI tools have been designed for Ki-67 assessment, their impact on pathologists' work remains understudied. 90 international pathologists were recruited to assess the Ki-67 PI of ten breast cancer tissue microarrays with and without AI. Accuracy, agreement, and turnaround time with and without AI were compared. Pathologists' perspectives on AI were collected. Using AI led to a significant decrease in PI error (2.1% with AI vs. 5.9% without AI, p < 0.001), better inter-rater agreement (ICC: 0.70 vs. 0.92; Krippendorff's α: 0.63 vs. 0.89; Fleiss' Kappa: 0.40 vs. 0.86), and an 11.9% overall median reduction in turnaround time. Most pathologists (84%) found the AI reliable. For Ki-67 assessments, 76% of respondents believed AI enhances accuracy, 82% said it improves consistency, and 83% trust it will improve efficiency. This study highlights AI's potential to standardize Ki-67 scoring, especially between 5 and 30% PI-a range with low PI agreement. This could pave the way for a universally accepted PI score to guide treatment decisions, emphasizing the promising role of AI integration into pathologist workflows.

Validation of the Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT 4 Assay on the GeneXpert instrument to Assess Hormone Receptor, Ki67, and HER2 Gene Expression Status in Breast Cancer Tissue Samples

Breast cancer is the commonest cause of cancer-related mortality in African females where patients often present later and with advanced disease. Causes for delayed diagnosis include restricted diagnostic access and international controversy on interpretation of ancillary tests like immunohistochemistry (IHC). Fine needle aspirates (FNAC) are an attractive alternative although may have reduced sensitivity. The Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 (STRAT4) (CE-IVD*) assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale) is a semi-quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay which detects messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in breast samples for estrogen receptor ( ESR1 ), progesterone receptor ( PGR1 ), human epidermal growth factor receptor/Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2/ ERBB2 ) and the proliferation marker, MKi67 . We assessed the performance of this assay on both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE, n=31) and matched FNAC (n=20) samples from patients presenting with breast cancer to the Johannesburg academic hospitals. IHC and Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis (performed on HER2-indeterminate samples) was compared with the mRNA expression of the corresponding target genes in FFPE samples, and mRNA expression on FNAC samples was compared with the FFPE results for both mRNA expression and IHC. Concordance between IHC/FISH and Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 in FFPE and FNAC samples using the Quick lysis (Q) method (a research-use-only modification of the validated FFPE-lysis method), showed an overall percentage agreement for ESR1 expression of 90.3% and 81.3%, and for PGR1 expression at 86.7% and 81.3% respectively in FFPE and FNAC samples. Concordance was lowest for Ki67 expression, using a binary IHC cutoff for Ki67 positivity at ≥20% staining) at 83.9% and 62.5%, for FFPE and FNAC samples, respectively. This suggests that the STRAT4 assay may be a useful ancillary test in determining HR and Ki67 status in FFPE samples and that use on FNAC samples may be feasible. Future studies should expand the sample numbers and establish locally relevant cutoffs.

Comparing the peri-implantation endometrial T-bet/GATA3 ratio between control fertile women and patients with recurrent miscarriage: establishment and application of a reference range

STUDY QUESTION

Is the ratio of endometrial T-box expressed in T cell (T-bet) and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) changed in patients with recurrent miscarriage (RM) compared to fertile controls?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Our study showed a significantly higher T-bet/GATA3 ratio in patients with RM compared with fertile controls.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The endometrial T-bet (Th1 lineage-committed transcription factor)/GATA3 (Th2 lineage-committed transcription factor) ratio could represent the Th1/Th2 balance, which is particularly important for healthy pregnancy. However, a reliable reference range for the T-bet/GATA3 ratio during the peri-implantation period has not yet been established for use in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a retrospective study carried out in a private fertility center. The control group included 120 women in couples undergoing IVF treatment for male infertility, who had experienced a live-birth baby following the first IVF cycle. The study group included 93 women diagnosed with RM that experienced at least two consecutive clinically spontaneous miscarriages before gestational week 12. The ratio of T-bet/GATA3 was calculated in the control group and RM group.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Endometrium samples were collected at mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle prior to IVF treatment or pregnancy. The percentage of T-bet+ and GATA3+ cells in total endometrial cells was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and quantitative analysis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Using the 95th percentile to define the upper limits of the endometrial T-bet/GATA3 ratio during the mid-luteal phase, the reference range of control fertile women was ≤0.22. Compared with the control group, the RM group exhibited a significantly higher T-bet/GATA3 ratio (P = 0.02), and 19.4% (18/93) women with RM exhibited a T-bet/GATA3 ratio above the reference range in the mid-luteal phase.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

All patients were recruited from a single center. The stability and clinical value of the endometrial T-bet/GATA3 ratio require further investigation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The present study suggests that an abnormal endometrial T-bet/GATA3 ratio may be one of the risk factors of RM. Further studies are needed to follow up the pregnancy outcomes in patients with RM with normal and abnormal endometrial T-bet/GATA3 ratio according to the reference range.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program (JCYJ20180228164631121, JCYJ20190813161203606, JCYJ20220530172817039). There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

The Biomarker Ki-67: Promise, Potential, and Problems in Breast Cancer

Ki-67 is a nuclear protein serendipitously discovered by monoclonal antibody selection in the early 1980s. While it has been applied for decades in the context of breast cancer as a putative prognostic and, more recently, predictive, biomarker, even after all this time there is incomplete agreement as to the validity of the immunohistochemical assays employed for Ki-67 assessment, given possible effects of the disparate methodologies employed and possible confounding preanalytical, analytical, and interpretive variables. In this brief review, the history of Ki-67 and the problems, particularly with the analytical and interpretive variables, are highlighted through a selective review of the published literature. The contributions of the International Ki-67 Breast Cancer Working Group are highlighted, and in particular, the recommendations made by this group are reviewed. The potential of Ki-67 as a biomarker for breast cancer has not yet been fully realized, but an understanding of the power as well as the limitations of the methods of Ki-67 assessment are important if this biomarker can realize its potential.

Identifying the optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 in breast cancer: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Ki-67 is associated with breast cancer subtypes, but the optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 has not been established in our center. We evaluated the cutoff point of Ki-67 in breast cancer and analyzed the associations among Ki-67, clinicopathological features, and prognosis.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data and prognostic information of patients with breast cancer treated in our center were retrospectively collected, and the optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 was determined by univariate and multivariate survival risk analyses. The cutoff point was used to group the patients, and the differences in the clinicopathological features and prognosis were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 609 patients with estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer were enrolled. The mean Ki-67 value was 22.3% ± 15.4%, the median was 20%, and a cutoff point of 30% was an independent factor influencing recurrence-free survival. When 30% was used as the cutoff point, patients with a Ki-67 value of ≤30% had a better prognosis and lower tumor malignancy.

CONCLUSION

The optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 in breast cancer in our center is 30%.

Ki67 in Breast Cancer Assay: An Ad Hoc Testing Recommendation from the Canadian Association of Pathologists Task Force

Ki67, a marker of cellular proliferation, is commonly assessed in surgical pathology laboratories. In breast cancer, Ki67 is an established prognostic factor with higher levels associated with worse long-term survival. However, Ki67 IHC is considered of limited clinical use in breast cancer management largely due to issues related to standardization and reproducibility of scoring across laboratories. Recently, both the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada have approved the use of abemaciclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) for patients with HR+/HER2: high-risk early breast cancers in the adjuvant setting. Health Canada and the FDA have included a Ki67 proliferation index of ≥20% in the drug monograph. The approval was based on the results from monarchE, a phase III clinical trial in early-stage chemotherapy-naïve, HR+, HER2 negative patients at high risk of early recurrence. The study has shown significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with abemaciclib when combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy at two years. Therefore, there is an urgent need by the breast pathology and medical oncology community in Canada to establish national guideline recommendations for Ki67 testing as a predictive marker in the context of abemaciclib therapy consideration. The following recommendations are based on previous IKWG publications, available guidance from the monarchE trial and expert opinions. The current recommendations are by no means final or comprehensive, and their goal is to focus on its role in the selection of patients for abemaciclib therapy. The aim of this document is to guide Canadian pathologists on how to test and report Ki67 in invasive breast cancer. Testing should be performed upon a medical oncologist’s request only. Testing must be performed on treatment-naïve tumor tissue. Testing on the core biopsy is preferred; however, a well-fixed resection specimen is an acceptable alternative. Adhering to ASCO/CAP fixation guidelines for breast biomarkers is advised. Readout training is strongly recommended. Visual counting methods, other than eyeballing, should be used, with global rather than hot spot assessment preferred. Counting 100 cells in at least four areas of the tumor is recommended. The Ki67 scoring app developed to assist pathologists with scoring Ki67 proposed by the IKWG, available for free download, may be used. Automated image analysis is very promising, and laboratories with such technology are encouraged to use it as an adjunct to visual counting. A score of <5 or >30 is more robust. The task force recommends that the results are best expressed as a continuous variable. The appropriate antibody clone and staining protocols to be used may take time to address. For the time being, the task force recommends having tonsils/+pancreas on-slide control and enrollment in at least one national/international EQA program. Analytical validation remains a pending goal. Until the data become available, using local ki67 protocols is acceptable. The task force recommends participation in upcoming calibration and technical validation initiatives.

Discordance between PAM50 intrinsic subtyping and immunohistochemistry in South African women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different gene expression profiles, treatment options and outcomes. In South Africa, tumors are classified using immunohistochemistry. In high-income countries multiparameter genomic assays are being utilized with implications for tumor classification and treatment.

METHODS

In a cohort of 378 breast cancer patients from the SABCHO study, we investigated the concordance between tumor samples classified by IHC and the PAM50 gene assay.

RESULTS

IHC classified patients as ER-positive (77.5%), PR-positive (70.6%), and HER2-positive (32.3%). These results, together with Ki67, were used as surrogates for intrinsic subtyping, and showed 6.9% IHC-A-clinical, 72.7% IHC-B-clinical, 5.3% IHC-HER2-clinical and 15.1% triple negative cancer (TNC). Typing using the PAM50 gave 19.3% luminal-A, 32.5% luminal-B, 23.5% HER2-enriched and 24.6% basal-like. The basal-like and TNC had the highest concordance, while the luminal-A and IHC-A group had the lowest concordance. By altering the cutoff for Ki67, and realigning the HER2/ER/PR-positive patients to IHC-HER2, we improved concordance with the intrinsic subtypes.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the Ki67 be changed to a cutoff of 20-25% in our population to better reflect the luminal subtype classifications. This change would inform treatment options for breast cancer patients in settings where genomic assays are unaffordable.

Expression, assessment and significance of Ki67 expression in breast cancer: an update

Ki67 expression is one of the most important and cost-effective surrogate markers to assess for tumour cell proliferation in breast cancer (BC). The Ki67 labelling index has prognostic and predictive value in patients with early-stage BC, particularly in the hormone receptor-positive, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-negative (luminal) tumours. However, many challenges exist in using Ki67 in routine clinical practice and it is still not universally used in the clinical setting. Addressing these challenges can potentially improve the clinical utility of Ki67 in BC. In this article, we review the function, immunohistochemical (IHC) expression, methods for scoring and interpretation of results as well as address several challenges of Ki67 assessment in BC. The prodigious attention associated with use of Ki67 IHC as a prognostic marker in BC resulted in high expectation and overestimation of its performance. However, the realisation of some pitfalls and disadvantages, which are expected with any similar markers, resulted in an increasing criticism of its clinical use. It is time to consider a pragmatic approach and weigh the benefits against the weaknesses and identify factors to achieve the best clinical utility. Here we highlight the strengths of its performance and provide some insights to overcome the existing challenges.

Development of a novel BRCAness score that predicts response to PARP inhibitors

BACKGROUND

BRCAness is a characteristic feature of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mimicking BRCA gene mutation in breast cancer. We hypothesized that a measure to quantify BRCAness that causes synthetic lethality in BRCA mutated tumors will identify responders to PARP inhibitors.

METHODS

A total of 6753 breast cancer patients from 3 large independent cohorts were analyzed. A score was generated by transcriptomic profiling using gene set variation analysis algorithm on 34 BRCA1-mutation related genes selected by high AUC levels in ROC curve between BRCA1 mutation and wildtype breast cancer.

RESULTS

The score was significantly associated with BRCA1 mutation, high mutation load and intratumoral heterogeneity as expected, as well as with high HRD, DNA repair and MKi67 expression regardless of BRCA mutations. High BRCAness tumors enriched not only DNA repair, but also all five Hallmark cell proliferation-related gene sets. High BRCAness tumors were significantly associated with higher cytolytic activity and with higher anti-cancerous immune cell infiltration. Not only did the breast cancer cell lines with BRCA-mutation show high score, but even the other cells in human breast cancer tumor microenvironment were contributing to the score. The BRCAness score was the highest in triple-negative breast cancer consistently in all 3 cohorts. BRCAness was associated with response to chemotherapy and correlated strongly with response to PARP inhibitor in both triple-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a novel BRCAness score using BRCA-mutation-related gene expressions and found that it associates with DNA repair and predicts response to PARP inhibitors regardless of BRCA mutation.

Clinical validity and clinical utility of Ki67 in early breast cancer

Ki67 represents an immunohistochemical nuclear localized marker that is widely used in surgical pathology. Nuclear immunoreactivity for Ki67 indicates that cells are cycling and are in G1- to S-phase. The percentage of Ki67-positive tumor cells (Ki67 index) therefore provides an estimate of the growth fraction in tumor specimens. In breast cancer (BC), tumor cell proliferation rate is one of the most relevant prognostic markers and Ki67 is consequently helpful in prognostication similar to histological grading and mRNA profiling-based BC risk stratification. In BCs treated with short-term preoperative endocrine therapy, Ki67 dynamics enable distinguishing between endocrine sensitive and resistant tumors. Despite its nearly universal use in pathology laboratories worldwide, no internationally accepted consensus has yet been achieved for some methodological details related to Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Controversial issues refer to choice of IHC antibody clones, scoring methods, inter-laboratory reproducibility, and the potential value of computer-assisted imaging analysis and/or artificial intelligence for Ki67 assessment. Prospective clinical trials focusing on BC treatment have proven that Ki67, as determined by standardized central pathology assessment, is of clinical validity. Clinical utility has been demonstrated in huge observational studies.

Prognostic Significance of Substance P/Neurokinin 1 Receptor and Its Association with Hormonal Receptors in Breast Carcinoma

Expression and immunolocalization of Substance P (SP)/Neurokinin-1 Receptor (NK-1R) in breast carcinoma (BC) patients and its association with routine proliferative markers (ER, PR, HER2/neu, and Ki-67) were evaluated. A cross-sectional study was performed on 34 cases of BC. There were 23 cases of group A (grade III), 8 of group B (grade II), and only 3 cases of group C (grade I). All samples were then processed for SP and NK-1R immunohistochemistry for few cases. 14/23 cases (61%) of group A, 7/8 cases (88%) of group B, and 2/3 (67%) cases of group C were SP positive. Overall, strong staining (≥10% tumor cells), labeled as "+3," was observed in 9/14 (64.2%) cases of group A and 1/8 (12.5%) cases of group B. Moderate staining labelled as "+2" (in ≥10% tumor cells) was observed in 3/14 (21.4%) cases of group A and 4/8 (50%) cases of group B. Weak positive staining "+1" was observed in only 2/14 (14.28%) cases of group A, 2/8 (25%) cases of group B, and all 2/2 (100%) cases of group C. SP and NK-1R are overexpressed in breast carcinomas, and there is significant association between the grade of tumor and their overexpression.

Correlation of manual semi-quantitative and automated quantitative Ki-67 proliferative index with OncotypeDXTM recurrence score in invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is a widely used cancer proliferation assay; however, its limitations could be improved with automated scoring. The OncotypeDXTM Recurrence Score (ORS), which primarily evaluates cancer proliferation genes, is a prognostic indicator for breast cancer chemotherapy response; however, it is more expensive and slower than Ki-67.

OBJECTIVE

To compare manual Ki-67 (mKi-67) with automated Ki-67 (aKi-67) algorithm results based on manually selected Ki-67 "hot spots" in breast cancer, and correlate both with ORS.

METHODS

105 invasive breast carcinoma cases from 100 patients at our institution (2011-2013) with available ORS were evaluated. Concordance was assessed via Cohen's Kappa (κ).

RESULTS

57/105 cases showed agreement between mKi-67 and aKi-67 (κ 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.45), with 41 cases overestimated by aKi-67. Concordance was higher when estimated on the same image (κ 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.69). Concordance between mKi-67 score and ORS was fair (κ 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.42), and concordance between aKi-67 and ORS was poor (κ 0.10, 95% CI -0.03-0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the limits of Ki-67 algorithms that use manual "hot spot" selection. Due to suboptimal concordance, Ki-67 is likely most useful as a complement to, rather than a surrogate for ORS, regardless of scoring method.