Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Clinical Significance of p53 Expression, MDM2 Amplification, and KIT Mutation Status

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Variants and Some Pitfalls That They Create

The diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is generally straightforward using a combination of histologic evaluation and pertinent immunohistochemical staining with CD117/kit and DOG-1 (discovered on GIST) antibodies. However, this tumor can be challenging in cases with an unusual morphology, in limited biopsies, for those in uncommon sites, post-treatment, and when other neoplasms express CD117/kit and DOG-1, thereby mimicking GIST. Finding epithelioid GISTs in the stomach in younger patients should prompt testing for succinate dehydrogenase (SHD)-deficiency using immunohistochemical staining for subunit B (SDHB). However, SDH-deficient GISTs can also arise in older patients, or as part of the Carney triad or Carney-Stratakis syndrome. GISTs with PDGFRA mutations can also prove difficult if they lack kit expression. It is also important to consider morphologic and immunophenotypic changes associated with treatment, including the potential absence of kit expression, particularly in GISTs that have metastasized. Therefore, obtaining clinical information regarding prior therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is crucial.

Microvessel density in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Microvessel density (MVD) constitutes a direct method of vascularity quantification and has been associated with survival rates in multiple malignancies.

AIM

To appraise the effect of MVD on the survival of patients with GIST.

METHODS

This study adhered to Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Electronic scholar databases and grey literature repositories were systematically screened. The Fixed Effects or Random Effects models were used according to the Cochran Q test.

RESULTS

In total, 6 eligible studies were identified. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for disease free survival (DFS) was 8.52 (95%CI: 1.69-42.84, P = 0.009). The odds ratios of disease-free survival between high and low MVD groups at 12 and 60 mo did not reach statistical significance. Significant superiority of the low MVD group in terms of DFS was documented at 36 and 120 mo (OR: 8.46, P < 0.0001 and OR: 22.71, P = 0.0003, respectively) as well as at metastases rate (OR: 0.11, P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

MVD significantly correlates with the HR of DFS and overall survival rates at 36 and 120 mo. Further prospective studies of higher methodological quality are required.

p53 as a biomarker and potential target in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

KIT and PDGFRA play a major role in the oncogenic process in gastrointestinal stroma tumors (GIST) and small molecules have been employed with great success to target the KIT and PDGFRA pathways in this cancer. However, approximately 10% of patients with GIST are resistant to current targeted drug therapy. There is a need to explore other potential targets. Although p53 alterations frequently occur in most cancers, studies regarding p53 in GIST have been limited. The CDKN2A/MDM2/p53 axis regulates cell cycle progression and DNA damage responses, which in turn control tumor growth. This axis is the major event required for transformation from low- to high-risk GIST. Generally, p53 mutation is infrequent in GIST, but p53 overexpression has been reported to be associated with high-risk GIST and unfavorable prognosis, implying that p53 should play a critical role in GIST. Also, Wee1 regulates the cell cycle and the antitumor activity of Wee1 inhibition was reported to be p53 mutant dependent. In addition, Wee1 was reported to have potential activity in GIST through the regulation of KIT protein and this mechanism may be dependent on p53 status. In this article, we review previous reports regarding the role of p53 in GIST and propose targeting the p53 pathway as a novel additional treatment strategy for GIST.

Noncanonical roles of p53 in cancer stemness and their implications in sarcomas

Impairment of the prominent tumor suppressor p53, well known for its canonical role as the "guardian of the genome", is found in almost half of human cancers. More recently, p53 has been suggested to be a crucial regulator of stemness, orchestrating the differentiation of embryonal and adult stem cells, suppressing reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells, or inhibiting cancer stemness (i.e., cancer stem cells, CSCs), which underlies the development of therapy-resistant tumors. This review addresses these noncanonical roles of p53 and their implications in sarcoma initiation and progression. Indeed, dysregulation of p53 family proteins is a common event in sarcomas and is associated with poor survival. Additionally, emerging studies have demonstrated that loss of wild-type p53 activity hinders the terminal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and leads to the development of aggressive sarcomas. This review summarizes recent findings on the roles of aberrant p53 in sarcoma development and stemness and further describes therapeutic approaches to restore normal p53 activity as a promising anti-CSC strategy to treat refractory sarcomas.

Caveolin-1 expression predicts favourable outcome and correlates with PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs)

AIMS

Novel prognostic markers are warranted for gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Caveolin-1 is a multifunctional protein that proved to be associated with outcome in multiple tumour types. Aim of this study was to investigate Caveolin-1 expression and prognostic efficacy in a series of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

METHODS

Caveolin-1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a retrospective series of 66 gastrointestinal stromal tumours representative of the different molecular subtypes. Correlations with clinical, histopathological and molecular features were investigated. Statistical analyses were performed as appropriate.

RESULTS

Thirty-five cases out of 66 (53.0%) expressed Caveolin-1. Presence of Caveolin-1 expression correlated with favourable histopathologic and clinical traits, including a lower mitotic count (p=0.003) and lower relapse rate (p=0.005). Caveolin-1 expression also resulted associated with the presence of PDGFRA mutations (p=0.010). Outcome analyses showed a favourable prognostic significance of Caveolin-1 expression in terms of relapse-free survival (HR=0.14; 95% CI=0.03 to 0.63) and overall survival (HR=0.29; 95% CI=0.11 to 0.74), even after adjusting for the mutational subgroup (relapse-free survival: HR=0.14, 95% CI=0.04 to 0.44; overall survival: HR=0.29, 95% CI=0.11 to 0.51) and imatinib treatment (relapse-free survival: HR=0.14, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.81; overall survival: HR=0.29, 95% CI=0.17 to 0.48).

CONCLUSION

Caveolin-1 represents a novel prognostic marker in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Further studies are warranted to validate these results and to explore the mechanisms linking Caveolin-1 expression with the PDGFRA oncogenic pathway.

[Primary liposarcomas of the digestive tract: Diversity of clinicopathological presentations and diagnostic challenges]

Sarcomas are rare tumours that represent less than 1% of all malignant tumours in adults. Liposarcomas are among the most common malignant mesenchymal tumours. They are preferentially located in the limbs and the retroperitoneum. Liposarcomas primarily arising in the digestive tract are exceptional with a few cases reported in the literature. Their clinical presentation is variable and the symptoms are not specific. Anatomopathological examination remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and the classification of these tumours, which are divided into 5 histological types according to the 5th edition of the WHO classification of soft tissue tumours. We report two observations of unusual digestive liposarcomas, located in the oesophagus and the colon, emphasizing the variability of the diagnostic challenges, depending on the clinical presentation, the histological type and the analysed material.

Overexpression of CD55 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in gastric stromal tumors

Backgrounds: Accumulating evidences have demonstrated that CD55 can protect cells from complement-mediated attack, and is involved in tumor dedifferentiation, migration, invasiveness, and metastasis. However, the role of CD55 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been investigated. Aims: Our study aimed to analyze the expression of CD55 in gastric GISTs and its correlations with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis. Materials and methods: A total of 118 gastric GIST patients were included in our study. CD55 expression in GIST tissue samples was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Cumulative survival was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with gastric GISTs. Results: Of 118 gastric GISTs patients included in our study, 44 (37.3%) were positive for CD55 expression. Positive CD55 expression in gastric GISTs was closely associated with tumor size (13.52±7.35 vs 5.07±1.90 cm, respectively; P<0.001), Ki 67 labeling index (P=0.001), mitotic counts (P=0.005), NIH risk classification (P<0.001), PLR (P<0.001), and metastasis at initial diagnosis (P=0.002). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that tumor size (P<0.001), mitotic counts (P<0.001), Ki 67 labeling index (P<0.001), PLR (P<0.001), metastasis at initial diagnosis (P=0.031), and CD55 expression (P<0.001) were statistically significant risk factors affecting PFS of patients with gastric GISTs. Cox multivariate survival analysis showed that mitotic counts, Ki 67 labeling index, and CD55 expression were independent predictors of PFS for gastric GISTs. Conclusion: CD55 may be a potential prognostic marker in gastric GISTs patients.

Gene expression analyses determine two different subpopulations in KIT-negative GIST-like (KNGL) patients

Introduction

There are limited findings available on KIT-negative GIST-like (KNGL) population. Also, KIT expression may be post-transcriptionally regulated by miRNA221 and miRNA222. Hence, the aim of this study is to characterize KNGL population, by differential gene expression, and to analyze miRNA221/222 expression and their prognostic value in KNGL patients.

Methods

KIT, PDGFRA, DOG1, IGF1R, MIR221 and MIR222 expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR. We also analyzed KIT and PDGFRA mutations, DOG1 expression, by immunohistochemistry, along with clinical and pathological data. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) differences were calculated using Log-rank test.

Results

Hierarchical cluster analyses from gene expression data identified two groups: group I had KIT, DOG1 and PDGFRA overexpression and IGF1R underexpression and group II had overexpression of IGF1R and low expression of KIT, DOG1 and PDGFRA. Group II had a significant worse OS (p = 0.013) in all the series, and showed a tendency for worse OS (p = 0.11), when analyzed only the localized cases. MiRNA222 expression was significantly lower in a control subset of KIT-positive GIST (p < 0.001). OS was significantly worse in KNGL cases with higher expression of MIR221 (p = 0.028) or MIR222 (p = 0.014).

Conclusions

We identified two distinct KNGL subsets, with a different prognostic value. Increased levels of miRNA221/222, which are associated with worse OS, could explain the absence of KIT protein expression of most KNGL tumors.

The expression of MDM2 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: immunohistochemical analysis of 35 cases

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common primary mesenchymal tumors of the digestive system. The assessment of their biological behavior still remains a scientific challenge. To date, there are no well-established biological prognostic markers of GIST. Our aim is to study the expression of the MDM2 oncoprotein in GIST through an immunohistochemical analysis.

Methods

It was a retrospective study of 35 cases of GIST diagnosed from 2009 to 2012 in the department of pathology of Hassan II university hospital, Fès, Morocco. MDM2 immunohistochemical staining was performed on archival paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed specimens (with a threshold of nuclear positivity > 10%). Analysis of correlations between MDM2 immunoexpression and clinicopathological features of GIST has been performed.

Results

The mean age was 55.23 years (range 25–84 years) with a male predominance (sex ratio = 1.5). The stomach was the main site of GIST, with 17 cases (48.57%) followed by the small bowel (9 cases, 25.71%). The spindle cell type GIST was the most frequent morphological variant (29 cases, 82.85%). Tumor necrosis was present in 8 cases (22.85%). Two patients (5.71%) had very low risk GIST, 5 (14.28%) had low risk GIST, 7 patients (20%) had intermediate risk tumors. The remaining 21 cases (60%) had high risk GIST. At the time of diagnosis, 9 patients (25.71%) had metastatic tumors. At immunohistochemical analysis, 40% of cases (14 patients) stained positive for MDM2. Of these MDMD2-positive tumors, 11/14 (78.57%) had high risk tumors and 8/14 cases (57.14%) presented with metastatic GIST. MDM2 positivity was significantly associated with the metastatic status (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The current study suggests that MDM2 immunohistochemical expression is a negative histoprognostic factor in GIST with a statistically significant correlation with metastasis.

GIST Manifesting as a Retroperitoneal Tumor: Clinicopathologic Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Genetic Study of 112 Cases

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occur in the tubular gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but some present apparently outside the GI tract. In this study, we analyzed 112 GISTs located in the retroperitoneum. These tumors occurred in 55 women and 57 men with a median age of 65 years (range: 21 to 89 y). On the basis of clinically or histologically detected connections to GI tract, 15 tumors were considered likely of gastric, 9 duodenal, and 13 of small intestinal origin. The remaining cases were categorized by location as peripancreatic (n=25), pelvic (n=11), mesenteric (n=4), and of unspecified/miscellaneous sites (n=35). The tumors varied in size 3 to 35 cm (median, 15 cm) and by mitotic rate per 5 mm, 0 to >100 (median, 10). Histologically the tumors apparently arising outside the GI tract had features of intestinal (n=41) and gastric GISTs (n=25); 9 cases had indeterminate histology. The histologic variants included spindled, epithelioid, vacuolated, nested, and myxoid potentially simulating other tumors such as liposarcoma and solitary fibrous tumor. Most GISTs were KIT-positive (106/112 cases), and the remaining 6 tumors were DOG1/Ano1-positive. Five cases showed focal nuclear positivity for MDM2. KIT mutations were detected in 42/59 cases, and PDGFRA mutations in 4/16 KIT wild-type and 3/5 of the KIT-negative tumors analyzed. One pelvic retroperitoneal GIST was succinate dehydrogenase deficient. All 79 patients were dead at last follow-up with a median survival of 14 months, with few survivals >5 years. Only operable versus inoperable tumor was a statistically favorable factor in univariate analysis (P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, mitotic rate >50/5 mm was significant for a shorter survival (hazard ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-16.8; P<0.01). Histologic and clinicopathologic similarity of extragastrointestinal retroperitoneal GISTs with GISTs of GI tract suggests their GI tract origin. Potentially overlapping features between GIST and other retroperitoneal tumors necessitate use of multiple diagnostic markers and molecular genetic studies.