SMARCB1-deficient Vulvar Neoplasms: A Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Genetic Study of 14 Cases

Underreporting of SMARCB1 alteration by clinical sequencing: Integrative patho-genomic analysis captured SMARCB1/INI-1 deficiency in a vulvar yolk sac tumor

•SMARCB1/INI1-deficient gynecologic tumors are rare and clinically aggressive. A subset shows primitive yolk sac tumor features.•Due to technical limitation of next generation sequencing (NGS) and interlaboratory variability in sequencing methodologies and analytical pipelines, SMARCB1 deficiency caused by somatic copy number variations (SCNV) may be underreported by NGS.•To improve identification of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient neoplasm, we propose the following strategy: First, careful pathology slide review and detection of rhabdoid cells should raise the possibility of SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency. Second, INI1 IHC is a useful complementary test to exclude clinical suspicion of SMARCB1 deficiency in the context of negative molecular reporting. Third, knowledge of potential underreporting of SMARCB1 mutation would avoid underdiagnosis.

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the perineum: A case report and literature review

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the perineum is a rare soft-tissue malignancy, and only 55 cases have been reported in the English literature to date. This tumor has an indetectable early symptom and frequent recurrences. Here, we present the case of a 31-year-old man with proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the perineum who underwent wide excision. Further, we reviewed the current literature regarding differential diagnosis and management of this disease.

The genetic landscape of SMARCB1 alterations in SMARCB1-deficient spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms

SMARCB1 biallelic inactivation resulting in SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency drives a wide range of malignancies, including many mesenchymal tumors. However, the specific types of SMARCB1 alterations and spectrum of cooperating mutations among various types of sarcomas has not been well investigated. We profiled SMARCB1 genetic alterations by targeted DNA sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a large cohort of 118 soft tissue and bone tumors, including SMARCB1-deficient sarcomas (78, 66%): epithelioid sarcomas, epithelioid peripheral nerve sheath tumors, poorly differentiated chordomas, malignant rhabdoid tumors, and soft tissue myoepithelial tumors, as well as non-SMARCB1-deficient sarcomas (40, 34%) with various SMARCB1 genetic alterations (mutations, copy number alterations). SMARCB1 loss by immunohistochemistry was present in 94% SMARCB1 pathogenic cases. By combined sequencing and FISH assays, 80% of SMARCB1-deficient tumors harbored homozygous (biallelic) SMARCB1 loss, while 14% demonstrated heterozygous SMARCB1 loss-of-function (LOF) alterations, and 6% showed no demonstrable SMARCB1 alterations. FISH and sequencing were concordant in the ability to detect SMARCB1 loss in 48% of cases. Epithelioid sarcomas most commonly (75%) harbored homozygous deletions, while a subset showed focal intragenic deletions or LOF mutations (nonsense, frameshift). In contrast, most soft tissue myoepithelial tumors (83%) harbored SMARCB1 nonsense point mutations without copy number losses. Additionally, clinically significant, recurrent co-occurring genetic events were rare regardless of histotype. By sequencing, extended 22q copy number loss in genes flanking the SMARCB1 locus (22q11.23) occurred in one-third of epithelioid sarcomas and the majority of poorly differentiated chordomas. Poorly differentiated chordomas and soft tissue myoepithelial tumors showed significantly worse overall and disease-free survival compared to epithelioid sarcomas. Overall, SMARCB1 LOF alterations predominate and account for SMARCB1 protein loss in most cases: majority being biallelic but a subset were heterozygous. In contrast, SMARCB1 alterations of uncertain significance can be seen in diverse sarcomas types and does not indicate a SMARCB1-deficient entity.

A Subset of SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient vulvar neoplasms express germ cell markers

AIMS

SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient vulvar neoplasms comprise a group of rare tumours that include epithelioid sarcoma (ES), myoepithelial carcinoma (MEC), the recently described myoepithelioma-like tumour of the vulvar region (MELTVR), and sarcomas that are difficult to classify. It has been suggested that so-called vulvar yolk sac tumours (YST) may represent morphologic variants of SMARCB1-deficient tumours; thus, we investigated the immunoreactivity of germ cell markers in SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms were stained with germ cell tumour markers (SALL4, glypican-3, OCT3/4, and AFP) and re-reviewed for morphologic features. The tumours occurred in adult females (median age 41 years) and included ES (n = 7), MELTVR (n = 2), and MEC (n = 1). All cases showed loss of SMARCB1 expression. Four cases (40%) were focally positive for SALL4 in areas with morphology of typical-appearing ES. One of these cases also showed focal staining for OCT3/4. One ES showed a transition from typical-appearing ES to YST-like morphology, with diffuse expression of SALL4 and glypican-3, and focal expression of AFP, in these latter areas. All other tested cases were negative for AFP.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals that SALL4, glypican-3, and OCT3/4 are positive in a subset of SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms, which may pose a diagnostic challenge and result in consideration of a germ cell tumour. We also highlight a case with transition from ES to YST-like morphology, lending further support that YSTs of the vulva are somatically derived SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms and do not represent true germ-cell neoplasia.

Update on Mesenchymal Lesions of the Lower Female Genital Tract

This article provides an update of the recent developments in mesenchymal tumors of lower genital tract. We focus on the characterization of recurrent molecular events in certain genital stromal tumors, for instance angiomyofibroblastomas and superficial myofibroblastomas. Moreover, fusions involving Tyrosine-kinases receptors (NTRK, FRFR1, RET, COL1A1-PDGFB) have been demonstrated in an emerging group of mesenchymal tumors characterized by a fibrosarcoma-like morphology and a predilection for uterine cervix of premenopausal women. We also cover the topic of smooth muscle tumors of the lower genital tract, which can be now classified using the same diagnostic criteria than their uterine counterpart..

Myoepithelioma-like tumors of the vulvar region: A case report and review of the literature

Myoepithelioma-like tumors of the vulvar region (MELTVR) is a kind of solid tumor newly recognized in recent years, which is characterized by mesenchymal tumors of adult female vulva. The histopathology is similar to myoepithelioma, but the immunohistochemical phenotype and genetic changes are different from myoepithelioma. It usually has clear boundary and partial capsule, mixed with two forms of cells (epithelioid and spindle), the cells are mild, the nucleoli are clear, mitoses are rare, some cases have myxoid differentiation. In this article, a case of MELTVR diagnosed in our hospital is discussed. The patient was a 43-year-old female who finds a neoplasm in the pubic tubercle 4 months ago. Local resection was performed. Pathological examination showed that the boundary of the tumor was clear with partial capsule. The cells were arranged in cords or nests, and partially infiltrated the surrounding adipocytes. The tumor cells had two morphologies, epithelioid or spindle shaped. The spindle type cells were dominant, with bright cytoplasm, obvious nucleoli, rare nuclear mitosis (about 1/10HPF), and no necrosis was observed. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, estrogen receptor, progestogen receptor, calponin and were partially positive for cathepsin k. INI1/SMARCB1 expression was deficient. There was no recurrence or metastasis during the 8-month-long follow-up. The unique feature of this case was that the site of the disease was not the vulva, but in front of the pubic tubercle, there was no large amount of mucus production, and the cytoplasm of most tumor cells was transparent. Due to our limited knowledge of MELTVR, its pathogenesis and tissue origin are not clear. Clinicians should be aware of such potential patients.

Immunotherapy for SMARCB1-Deficient Sarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Developments

Mutations in subunits of the SWItch Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex occur in 20% of all human tumors. Among these, the core subunit SMARCB1 is the most frequently mutated, and SMARCB1 loss represents a founder driver event in several malignancies, such as malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT), epithelioid sarcoma, poorly differentiated chordoma, and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC). Intriguingly, SMARCB1-deficient pediatric MRT and RMC have recently been reported to be immunogenic, despite their very simple genome and low tumor mutational burden. Responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors have further been reported in some SMARCB1-deficient diseases. Here, we will review the preclinical data and clinical data that suggest that immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for SMARCB1-defective tumors. We notably discuss the heterogeneity that exists among the spectrum of malignancies driven by SMARCB1-loss, and highlight challenges that are at stake for developing a personalized immunotherapy for these tumors, notably using molecular profiling of the tumor and of its microenvironment.

Myoepithelial carcinoma of soft tissue is a diagnostic challenge on fine-needle aspiration: Case report and review of literature

Myoepithelial carcinoma (MEC) of soft tissue, also known as malignant myoepithelial tumor, is an uncommon malignancy. Cytologic diagnosis of this entity is challenging due to its rarity and heterogeneous morphology. We report a case of MEC in a 22-year-old man, who presented with a 6.5 cm soft tissue mass on his right distal forearm that has been enlarging over the past 3 months. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) revealed abundant isolated neoplastic cells ranging from spindled cells to epithelioid and plasmacytoid morphology in a myxoid background. These cells showed moderate cytologic atypia characterized by high-nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, irregular nuclear contours, and prominent nucleoli. The cytoplasm varied from dense to vacuolated and occasionally rhabdoid with intracytoplasmic inclusions. Scattered bi- and multinucleated cells were identified. A diagnosis of high-grade malignancy was made with the differential diagnosis including rhabdomyosarcoma and melanoma. A subsequent core biopsy of the tumor showed immunoreactivity for pan-cytokeratins, calponin, p63, and smooth muscle actin. INI-1 was lost. SOX-10 and Melan-A were negative. Molecular studies showed loss of SMARCB1 (INI-1) and CDKN2A. Gene fusion studies did not detect any fusion. A diagnosis of soft tissue MEC was made which is a challenge on FNA due to several cytologic mimickers including rhabdomyosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, extrarenal rhabdoid tumor, extra-axial chordoma and melanoma. Recognition of the biphasic cell population in a myxoid background and a battery of immunohistochemical stains are crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Vulvar Yolk Sac Tumors Are Somatically Derived SMARCB1 (INI-1)-Deficient Neoplasms

So-called primary yolk sac tumors of the vulva are very rare and often have an aggressive disease course. Their molecular features have not been previously characterized. There is also a well-documented group of SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient vulvar neoplasms, which includes proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelial carcinoma. Until now, "vulvar yolk sac tumors" and SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms were considered unrelated diseases. After reviewing an index case of a vulvar yolk sac tumor with loss of SMARCB1 by immunohistochemistry, we retrospectively identified 2 additional cases diagnosed as vulvar yolk sac tumors. Patient ages were 34, 32, and 25 years old, and 2 tumors were associated with a pregnancy. All 3 cases showed morphology typical of a yolk sac tumor, and by immunohistochemistry all were positive for SALL4, glypican-3, keratins, and lacked CD34 positivity. All tumors also demonstrated loss of SMARCB1 in tumor cells. Targeted molecular profiling was performed in 2 cases and identified 2 copy deletion of SMARCB1, without genomic alterations typically seen in gonadal yolk sac tumors. In the third case, isochromosome 12p was not identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. All 3 patients had either local recurrences or distant metastases, and 2 died of disease. One patient had progressive disease while receiving the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitor tazemetostat. Overall, these findings suggest that vulvar tumors with pure yolk sac-like morphology may represent morphologic variants of SMARCB1-deficient tumors and not veritable germ cell neoplasia. This potential reclassification may have both prognostic and treatment implications and warrants study of additional extragonadal yolk sac tumors.

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma in pubic region expressing L-type amino acid transporter 1: A case report

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma is an aggressive malignant soft-tissue neoplasm, a “proximal” variant of epithelioid sarcoma, resistant to multimodal therapy and involved in early tumor-related death. Pertinent treatments are, therefore, continually being explored. A 24-year-old woman with nonmetastatic proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma, originating subcutaneously on the right side of the vulva, underwent surgical resection; the lesion recurred, however, leading to death 3 months after the second surgery. Here described is a case of proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma expressing L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) that transports essential amino acids and p-borono-L-phenylalanine (BPA)—the chemical compound used in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT)—and is highly expressed in many malignant tumors. Recently, LAT1 has drawn attention, and relevant treatments have been studied—LAT1 inhibitor and BNCT. LAT1 expression in proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma may lead to cogent treatments for the disease.

Myxoepithelioid tumour with chordoid features: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and genetic study of 14 cases of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft-tissue neoplasm

AIMS

Complete loss of SMARCB1/INI1 in soft-tissue tumours such as malignant rhabdoid tumour, epithelioid sarcoma, myoepithelial tumour of soft tissue and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is often associated with high-grade malignancy and poor prognosis. The diagnosis is sometimes challenging, owing to histological similarities, so careful differential diagnosis is required. Therefore, soft-tissue tumours with complete SMARCB1/INI1 loss could potentially include an unknown entity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 160 cases of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft-tissue tumour, and found 14 cases that were not classifiable into already existing categories and had common clinical and histological features. These involved two male and 12 female patients, ranging in age from 20 years to 61 years. The tumours were located in the the puboinguinal region (n = 13) and pelvic cavity (n = 1). Histologically, the tumours showed relatively uniform epithelioid to spindle-shaped cells with myxoid stroma. All tumours showed immunoreactivity for brachyury, epithelial membrane antigen, and progesterone receptor, and 12 of 14 cases did so for oestrogen receptor. Variable positive staining for α-smooth muscle actin, S100 and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was seen. NR4A3 and EWSR1 gene rearrangements were not detected in 13 and 11 examined cases, respectively. Clinical follow-up data for the 14 patients showed that 13 were alive without disease and one had been lost to follow-up; four patients developed local recurrence and/or metastases.

CONCLUSION

The designation 'myxoepithelioid tumour with choroid features' (METC) was proposed as a tumour with intermediate malignancy controllable with appropriate treatment, including the entity of myoepithelioma-like tumour of the vulvar region. METC represents a novel and independent subset that is histologically, biologically and clinically distinct from already existing SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft-tissue tumours.

Primary cutaneous SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma

BACKGROUND

SMARCB1-deficient malignancies can arise in various sites. We describe a novel primary SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma of skin (SDCS) and characterize SMARCB1 mutations in non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC).

METHODS

Cases underwent immunophenotyping and targeted exome sequencing (MSK-IMPACT) assay interrogating somatic mutations in 468 cancer-related genes. The MSK-IMPACT database from 2014 to 2020 encompassing 55, 000 cases was searched for NMSC with SMARCB1 mutations.

RESULTS

SDCS arose on the scalp of an 18-year-old woman showing homozygous SMARCB1 deletion with a LATS2 G963E variant. Another case arose on the temple of a 76-year-old man harboring a SMARCB1 W206* mutation associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH), 59 concurrent mutations, and a UV mutation signature (UV-MS). Both tumors exhibited INI1 loss, positive CK5/6, p40, p63, and claudin-4 with negative CD34. Of 378 NMSC cases, including 370 carcinomas, 7 SMARCB1-mutated tumors were identified: 3 squamous cell, 3 Merkel cell, and one basal cell carcinoma. Six showed UV-MS. Five INI1-interrogated cases retained protein expression suggesting they were SMARCB1-proficient.

CONCLUSIONS

SDCS can be clinically aggressive, harbor SMARCB1 homozygous deletions or truncating SMARCB1 mutations associated with LOH, and can occur with or without UV-MS. Overall, SMARCB1 mutations in NMSC are rare with most being of undetermined significance and associated with retained INI1 and UV-MS.

Update on SWI/SNF-related gynecologic mesenchymal neoplasms: SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma and SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms

Our knowledge regarding the role of genes encoding the chromatin remodeling switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex in the initiation and progression of gynecologic malignancies continues to evolve. This review focuses on gynecologic tumors in which the sole or primary genetic alteration is in SMARCA4 or SMARCB1, two members of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. In this review, we present a brief overview of the classical example of such tumors, ovarian small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type, and then a detailed review and update of SMARCB1-deficient and SMARCA4-deficient tumors of the uterus and vulva.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated neoplasms of the female genital tract

Undifferentiated neoplasms in the female gynecologic tract comprise two main groups-undifferentiated carcinoma, most common in the endometrium and ovary, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, although tumors with an undifferentiated appearance may occur in all gynecologic organs. Their differential diagnosis is broad and generous sampling, careful morphological evaluation, judicious use of immunohistochemistry, and in many cases, molecular testing is often essential in the diagnostic work-up. As some of these neoplasms fail to respond to conventional chemotherapy regimens and/or radiation therapy, targeted therapy may be valuable in treating these highly aggressive tumors, thus the importance of precise diagnosis. In this review we discuss the clinicopathological features of undifferentiated carcinoma, dedifferentiated carcinoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, followed by a comprehensive analysis of morphological mimickers. Finally, we briefly review ovarian and lower genital tract tumors with an undifferentiated histological appearance.

Loss of SMARCB1 expression in colon carcinoma

SMARCB1 is a tumor suppressor gene, which is part of SWI/SNF complex involved in transcriptional regulation. Recently, loss of SMARCB1 expression has been reported in gastrointestinal carcinomas. Our purpose was to evaluate the incidence and prognostic value of SMARCB1 loss in colon carcinoma (CC). Patients with stage III CC (n= 1695), and a second cohort of 23 patients with poorly differentiated CC were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry for SMARCB1 was performed on tissue microarrays, and cases with loss of expression were controlled on whole sections. Loss of SMARCB1 was compared with the clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics, and the prognostic value was evaluated. Loss of SMARCB1 was identified in 12 of 1695 (0.7%) patients with stage III CC. Whole section controls showed a complete loss in only one of these cases, corresponding to a medullary carcinoma. SMARCB1 loss was not associated with histological grade, tumor size nor survival. In the cohort of poorly differentiated CC, we detected 2/23 (8.7%) cases with loss of SMARCB1; one was rhabdoid while the other had medullary and mucinous histology. These 2 cases were deficient for MisMatched Repair (dMMR) and mutated for BRAF. SMARCB1 loss is rare in stage III CC, but appears more frequent in poorly differentiated CC.

Myoepithelioma of soft tissue and bone, and myoepithelioma-like tumors of the vulvar region: Clinicopathological study of 15 cases by PLAG1 immunohistochemistry

We demonstrated the clinicopathological findings of 13 myoepitheliomas of soft tissue and bone (MESTBs) and two myoepithelioma-like tumors of the vulvar region (MELTVRs), focusing on the association between nuclear atypia and clinical course, and the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) of pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1) for the pathological diagnosis of these tumors. Of the 13 MESTBs, eight, one and four cases exhibited mild, moderate and severe nuclear atypia, respectively. Two cases with venous invasion showed severe nuclear atypia and both died of advanced disease. Two MELTVR cases showed moderate nuclear atypia and had no evidence of disease after surgery. On IHC, 12 of 13 (92.3%) MESTBs showed PLAG1 immunoreactivity and none of the MELTVRs expressed PLAG1. In addition, MELTVRs showed loss of INI1 expression. In contrast, all MESTBs retained INI1 expression. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected EWSR1, FUS and PLAG1 rearrangement in 5 (38.5%), 0 (0%) and 2 (15.4%) of the 13 MESTBs, respectively. No EWSR1, FUS and PLAG1 rearrangement were observed in the METLVRs. In conclusion, MESTBs with both severe nuclear atypia and venous invasion would be indicative of malignant potential. PLAG1 might be a useful IHC marker in MESTB diagnosis.

SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies of the female genital tract

Mutations and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies, including those arising at various sites in the female genital tract. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas in the uterine corpus and ovary not uncommonly contain mutations in ARID1A and these also occur in other endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasms such as seromucinous tumours. In these organs, mutations in SMARCA4, SMARCB1, ARID1A and ARID1B (with subsequent loss of corresponding protein expression as a reliable surrogate) are relatively common in undifferentiated carcinomas, including the undifferentiated component of dedifferentiated carcinoma. SMARCA4 mutations are extremely common (almost ubiquitous) in small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcaemic type (SCCOHT), occurring in about 98% of these neoplasms, often in association with epigenetic SMARCA2 loss. SMARCB1-deficient vulval neoplasms include epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelial carcinoma, as well as related malignancies which defy easy classification. Recently the spectrum of SWI/SNF deficient female genital malignancies has been expanded to include SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and mural nodules of anaplastic carcinoma in ovarian mucinous neoplasms.

Gynecological Sarcomas: Molecular Characteristics, Behavior, and Histology-Driven Therapy

Gynecological sarcomas represent 3% to 4% of all gynecological malignancies and 13% of all sarcomas. The uterus is the most frequent primary site (83%); less frequently sarcomas are diagnosed originating from the ovary (8%), vulva and vagina (5%), and other gynecologic organs (2%). As the classification of gynecologic sarcomas continues to diversify, so does the management. Accurate histopathologic diagnosis, utilizing appropriate ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular analysis, could lead to a more personalized approach. However, there are subtypes that require further definition, with regard to putative predictive markers and optimal management. The aim of this review is to highlight the importance of accurate diagnosis and classification of gynecologic sarcoma subtypes by the surgical pathologist in order to provide more tailored systemic treatment, and to highlight the increasing importance of close collaboration between the pathologist and the oncologist.

Mesenchymal lesions of the vulva

Mesenchymal lesions of the vulva include site-specific entities limited to the lower genital tract, as well as a range of non-site-specific tumors that are more common at extragenital sites. Site-specific lesions include fibroepithelial stromal polyp, cellular angiofibroma, angiomyofibroblastoma, and aggressive angiomyxoma. Non-site-specific tumors that may occur in the vulva include those of smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, vascular, neural, adipocytic, and uncertain differentiation. This review discusses both site-specific and non-site-specific vulvar mesenchymal lesions including non-neoplastic proliferations, benign neoplasms, locally aggressive neoplasms with a predilection for local recurrence, neoplasms of indeterminate biologic potential, and frankly malignant neoplasms with a high risk of distant metastasis and death. Accurate diagnosis is essential for proper management, and is facilitated by correlation with clinical findings and targeted application of immunohistochemical and molecular studies.

SWI/SNF Complex Mutations in Gynecologic Cancers: Molecular Mechanisms and Models

The SWI/SNF (mating type SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable) chromatin remodeling complexes interact with histones and transcription factors to modulate chromatin structure and control gene expression. These evolutionarily conserved multisubunit protein complexes are involved in regulating many biological functions, such as differentiation and cell proliferation. Genomic studies have revealed frequent mutations of genes encoding multiple subunits of the SWI/SNF complexes in a wide spectrum of cancer types, including gynecologic cancers. These SWI/SNF mutations occur at different stages of tumor development and are restricted to unique histologic types of gynecologic cancers. Thus, SWI/SNF mutations have to function in the appropriate tissue and cell context to promote gynecologic cancer initiation and progression. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of SWI/SNF mutations in the development of gynecologic cancers to provide insights into both molecular pathogenesis and possible treatment implications for these diseases.

Myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar region: a case report in China and review of the literature

Background

Myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar region (MELTVR) is a recently described mesenchymal neoplasm which typically arising in vulvar regions of adult women.

Case presentation

Here we report a case of a 65-year-old woman who presented with a 6-year history of subcutaneous mass in the vulvar region. The mass had recently increased in size continuously. Histologically, the tumor cells had an epithelioid to spindled shape. Epithelioid tumor cells proliferated singly or in a loosely cohesive manner with myxoid areas, while spindled tumor cells grew in diffuse sheets or storiform arrangements mainly in nonmyxoid areas. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, calponin, and were partially mild to moderate positive for estrogen receptor, but completely negative for S100 protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein, CD34, desmin, SMA and cytokeratin. INI1/SMARCB1 expression was deficient. EWSR1 and FUS genes were intact tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Based on these findings, we diagnose this case as MELTVR. The patient remained relapse-free after the lesion was widely excised during 8 months follow-up.

Conclusions

This disease should be included in the differential diagnostic list of vulvar tumors with epithelioid to spindled morphology. Recognition of its histopathological features and immunohistochemical reactivity will help to understand the tumor better.

What is new in epithelioid soft tissue tumors?

Epithelioid cell features mimicking carcinomas characterize a variety of histogenetically, phenotypically, and molecularly distinct subsets of mesenchymal neoplasms. In a pathogenetic sense, epithelioid soft tissue tumors basically fall into three main genetic categories: (1) switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex-deficient tumors (with epithelioid sarcoma as their prototype); (2) epithelioid neoplasms driven by specific rare gene fusions (such as sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma with EWSR1 fusions and GLI1-related malignant epithelioid soft tissue neoplasms); and (3) a heterogeneous group encompassing epithelioid variants of diverse other entities. Notably, lesions in the first and third groups may display variable, occasionally prominent, rhabdoid cell morphology, thus further complicating their differential diagnosis. This review summarizes the main clinicopathological, phenotypic, and genotypic features of these diseases and discusses their pertinent differential diagnostic considerations.

Loss of SMARCB1 Expression Confers Poor Prognosis to Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma

Background  Due to the diverse histopathologic features and variable survival rates seen in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), it is likely that this diagnostic entity is comprised of a heterogonous group of morphologically undifferentiated tumors. As advancements in molecular testing have led to a better understanding of tumor biology, it has become increasingly evident that SNUC may actually encompass several tumor subtypes with different clinical behavior. As a result, it is also likely that all SNUC patients cannot be treated in the same fashion. Recent investigations have identified loss of the tumor suppressor SMARCB1 (INI1) expression in a subset of undifferentiated sinonasal tumors and extrasinonasal tumors and, studies have suggested that this genetic aberration may be a poor prognostic marker. The objective of this study was to identify differential expression of SMARCB1 in SNUC and to analyze and compare the survival outcomes in SNUC patients with and without SMARCB1 expression. Methods  All cases of undifferentiated or poorly differentiated neoplasms of the sinonasal tract treated between 2007 and 2018 at a single tertiary care institution were selected. All cases of SNUC were tested for SMARCB1 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Clinical parameters were analyzed using Student's t -test and Fischer's test. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival durations, while comparison between both the subgroups was done using the log-rank test. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of SPSS software, Version 25 (IBM, New York, NY, United States). Results  Fourteen cases of SNUC were identified. Approximately two-thirds (64%; n  = 9) of patients were male and the majority (79%; n  = 11) were between fifth to seventh decade. Skull base and orbital invasion were seen in 79% ( n  = 11) and 93% ( n  = 13) of cases, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of tumors ( n  = 8) retained SMARCB1 expression by IHC (SR-SNUC), while the remaining 43% ( n  = 6) showed loss of SMARCB1 expression and, thus, were considered as SMARCB1 -deficient (SD-SNUC). Although clinicopathological features and treatment modalities were similar, SD-SNUC showed poorer (OS: p  = 0.07; disease free survival [DFS]: p  = 0.02) overall survival (OS) and DFS on Kaplan-Meier curves. Additionally, SD-SNUC showed higher recurrence (75 vs. 17%) and mortality (67 vs. 14%) (hazard rate = 8.562; p  = 0.05) rates. Both OS (28.82 ± 31.15 vs. 53.24 ± 37.50) and DFS durations (10.62 ± 10.26 vs. 43.79 ± 40.97) were consistently worse for SD-SNUC. Five-year survival probabilities were lower for SD-SNUC (0.33 vs. 0.85). Conclusion  SNUC represents a heterogeneous group of undifferentiated sinonasal malignancies. Based on the status of SMARCB1 expression, the two subgroups SD-SNUC and SR-SNUC appear to represent distinct clinical entities, with loss of SMARCB1 expression conferring an overall worse prognosis.

[Pathological and molecular features of malignancies underlined by BAF complexes inactivation]

BAF complexes are chromatin remodelling complexes made up of 15 subunits which overview transcription regulation. A subset of their subunits are notoriously linked to cancer, with the examples of SMARCB1, SMARCA4, ARID1A/1B and PBRM1. The complexes act as tumor suppressor genes, commonly mutated in a wide array of malignancies with an overrepresentation of sarcomas and tumors of the central nervous system. The recurrent inactivation of their genes points towards their driving role in the tumorigenesis of SMARCB1 in malignant rhabdoid tumors and SMARCA4 in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. These tumors are morphologically similar composed of solid sheets of cells displaying vesicular nuclei dotted with clear chromatin and conspicuous nucleoli. Genomically, they share simple diploid profiles with no other alterations than in the culprit gene. Other mesenchymal tumors, distinct from malignant rhabdoid tumors are associated with BAF alterations, namely epithelioid sarcomas, SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas. BAF subunits are mostly inactivated through mutations or deletions but also occur through translocations in medullary carcinoma of the kidney and synovial sarcomas. Apart from tumors displaying recurrent alterations of the complexes, some variants or tumor variants display BAF alterations, including epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheet tumors and poorly differentiated chordomas. Lastly, some malignancies display low frequency of BAF alterations, in keeping with their passenger role in tumorigenesis with the example of dedifferentiated carcinomas, especially in colon, lung and uterus. BAF complexes alterations correlate with morphological features recognizable by microscopy, paving the way for their routine diagnosis and potential therapeutic prospects.

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the oral cavity: a case report and literature review

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma (PES) is an exceedingly rare malignant tumor of soft tissue; PES within the oral cavity is even rarer. Pathologic examination is the primary diagnostic modality, and surgical treatment is recommended as the preferred method for the treatment of PES. Currently, there is a paucity of literature that systematically reports on PES in the oral cavity. Here, we describe a 42-year-old man with PES in the oral cavity, which showed positivity for vimentin, cytokeratin, CD31, S-100 but did not express BCL-2, HMB-45, or desmin. We performed a wide excision and neck dissection, and then used the free anterolateral thigh flap to reconstruct the defect in the soft tissue. Furthermore, we review the current literature with regard to diagnosis and treatment of PES.

Myoepithelial carcinoma or epithelioid sarcoma - A rare diagnosis with poor prognosis. A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Myoepithelial carcinoma and proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the vulva are two rare malignancies with known aggressive behavior. In addition to a similar clinical course, these two disease entities also have significant histologic and pathologic overlap. Given the rarity of these malignancies, there is limited literature on the appropriate treatment regimen. Nevertheless, there is a consensus that early surgical resection is beneficial in both cases.

PRESENTATION

We present a case of a patient who was initially diagnosed with myoepithelial carcinoma of the vulva with a differential later expanded to include possible epithelioid sarcoma.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrate the importance in early identification of a SMARCB1 deficiency. Additionally, we suggest an appropriate treatment regimen for these patients going forward. Specifically, we encourage consideration of bilateral superficial and deep inguinal lymphadenectomies. Furthermore, sarcoma based chemotherapy regimens in the appropriate clinical setting may be beneficial in treating SMARCB1 deficient tumors. Additionally, there are now clinical trials involving EZH2 Inhibitors which may offer benefit for similar patients going forward.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the difficulty in making a definitive diagnosis, and the importance in identifying a SMARCB1 deficiency as it will affect treatment options and may allow for enrollment in ongoing clinical trials.

Loss of expression of SMARCA4 (BRG1), SMARCA2 (BRM) and SMARCB1 (INI1) in undifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium is not uncommon and is not always associated with rhabdoid morphology

AIM

Abnormalities of SMARCB1 (INI1), which encodes a member of the SWI/SNF pathway, are found in neoplasms with rhabdoid morphology, such as malignant rhabdoid tumour of the kidney and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour of the central nervous system. SMARCA4 (BRG1), which encodes another member of the SWI/SNF pathway, and which is mutated in almost all small-cell carcinomas of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type, has been investigated in endometrial carcinomas, and mutations with resultant loss of immunohistochemical staining have been demonstrated in some endometrial undifferentiated carcinomas/dedifferentiated carcinomas. The aim of this study was to evaluate immunohistochemical expression of SMARCA4, SMARCB1 and SMARCA2 in a cohort of undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas, and to correlate expression of these markers with rhabdoid morphology and clinical outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (18 pure and 22 dedifferentiated carcinomas) were stained with SMARCA4 (n = 40), SMARCB1 (n = 27), and SMARCA2 (n = 37). SMARCA4 expression was intact in 26 of 40 (65%) cases, lost in 13 of 40 (32.5%) cases, and unassessable in one case (2.5%). SMARCB1 expression was intact in 26 of 27 (96%) cases and lost in one of 27 (4%) cases. SMARCA2 expression was intact in 23 of 37 (62%) cases, lost in 10 of 37 (27%) cases, and unassessable in four cases. SMARCA2 expression showed corresponding loss in nine of the 13 (69%) SMARCA4-deficient cases. Rhabdoid morphology was present in three of 13 (23%) SMARCA4-deficient cases, in two of 10 (20%) SMARCA2-deficient cases, in four of 26 (15%) SMARCA4-intact cases, and in four of 23 (17%) SMARCA2-intact cases. There was no correlation between SMARCA4 or SMARCA2 expression and clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that almost one-third of endometrial undifferentiated carcinomas show loss of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 expression, and that a subset show rhabdoid morphology. The majority of the SMARCA4-deficient cases show concomitant loss of SMARCA2 expression. There is no correlation between SMARCA4 or SMARCA2 expression and outcome. Our results confirm that the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex is involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial undifferentiated carcinomas.

Epigenetic regulation of SMARCB1 By miR-206, -381 and -671-5p is evident in a variety of SMARCB1 immunonegative soft tissue sarcomas, while miR-765 appears specific for epithelioid sarcoma. A miRNA study of 223 soft tissue sarcomas

Complete/partial loss of SMARCB1 nuclear-immunopositivity is characteristic of a certain subset of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Our previous work showed that oncomiRs-206,-381, and 671-5p could silence the SMARCB1 mRNA and protein expression and that they display significant overexpression in epithelioid sarcomas (ESs). MiR-765 was overexpressed too, but functionally was inactive in the silencing. In the current work, using quantitative PCR, we conducted a miRNA study of 51 ESs, 20 rhabdoid tumors (RTs), 20 synovial sarcomas (SSs), 15 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), 11 myoepithelial carcinomas (MECs), and 10 extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas (EMCSs) with complete/partial loss of SMARCB1 nuclear immunostain, in contrast to controls (SMARCB1-immunopositive) of 96 STSs, 13 melanomas and 10 sarcomatoid carcinomas. The SMARCB1 genetic status of ESs was determined by MLPA and FISH. A subset of ESs (5/51) showed biallelic deletion of SMARCB1 with no overexpression of any miRNA, suggesting these tumors could be the counterpart of pediatric RT, at least genetically. Another subset (5/51) was genetically either intact or monoallelic deleted with at least threefold overexpression of one of miR-206,-381,-671-5p, suggesting epigenetic regulation only. 39/51 ESs had a biallelic deletion (>20% by FISH and/or by MLPA) but with overexpressed miR-206,-381, and 671-5p, suggesting intratumoral heterogeneity, i.e., both genetic and epigenetic regulation. At least threefold overexpression of one of miR-206,-381, and 671-5p was detected in all MPNSTs, EMCSs, SSs and 7 MCs. Except for ESs, four SSs and one MPNST, there was no event above threefold overexpression of miR-765 among all 195 tested tumors. Our results suggest a general role of miR-206,-381, and 671-5p in SMARCB1 gene silencing of ES, MC, EMCS, MPNST and SS. In the future, miR-765 could possibly be a diagnostic tool for ES because of its 97% specificity and 80% sensitivity. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.