Eosinophilic, Solid, and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathologic Study of 16 Unique, Sporadic Neoplasms Occurring in Women

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma with aggressive behavior: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic solid and cystic (ESC) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a unique and emerging subtype of RCC, has an indolent nature; in some rare instances, it may exhibit metastatic potential. Current cases are inadequate to precisely predict the clinical outcome of ESC RCC and determine treatment choices.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we report two patients with ESC RCC. Patient 1 was a young woman with classical pathological characteristics. Patient 2 was a 52-year-old man with multifocal metastases, involving the pulmonary hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, liver, brain, mesosternum, vertebra, rib, femur, and symphysis pubis. Awareness of ESC RCC, along with its characteristic architecture and immunophenotype, would contribute to making a definitive diagnosis, even on core biopsy samples.

CONCLUSION

The discovery of ESC RCC molecular signatures may provide new therapeutic strategies in the future.

Analysis of Imaging and Pathologic Features in Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is rare and difficult to diagnose. Therefore, we aim to investigate the imaging and pathologic features of ESC-RCC.

METHODS

Fifteen cases of ESC-RCC with pathologically confirmed diagnoses were retrospectively collected: CT was performed in 15 cases and MRI in 9 cases.

RESULTS

In these patients (6 males and 9 females) (age: mean, 53.3 ± 14.7 years; range, 27-72 years), all tumors were unilateral, renal, and solitary with no clinical symptoms and were classified into-type 1: cystic-solid component, with equal cystic and solid components, was the most common (8/15, 53.3%); type 2: predominantly cystic with a small solid component (4/15, 26.7%); and type 3: predominantly solid (3/15, 20%). The solid component showed equal/slightly higher density on the CT-plain-scan, equal/slightly high signal on the T1-weighted image (T1WI), and low signal on the T2-weighted image (T2WI). Ten cases showed progressive enhancement, while 5 showed a fast-wash-in and fast-wash-out enhancement. One patient experienced hemorrhage, while the others showed no signs of hemorrhage, necrosis, fat, or calcification. Pathologically, the tumor showed cystic solidity, with eosinophilic cytoplasm and granular basophilic-colored spots with focal or diffuse expression of CK20. Ten patients had componential nephrectomy and 5 had radical nephrectomy. No recurrence or metastasis was noted in any case at the follow-up (8-49 months).

CONCLUSION

This study describes the imaging and pathologic features of a rare type of renal cancer and proposes 3 imaging types to enhance physicians' diagnosis of this disease and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Contemporary review of papillary renal cell carcinoma-current state and future directions

Historically, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) was divided into two types, type 1 and type 2, based solely on morphology. However, it is apparent that PRCC is far more complex and represents a histological, clinical, and molecular spectrum. There has been a significant evolution in our understanding of PRCC, highlighted by the recognition of new and molecularly defined entities that were previously included in PRCC type 2. This contemporary review addresses the evolving concepts regarding the PRCC, including why it is no longer needed to subtype PRCC, the current molecular landscape, prognostic parameters, and PRCC variants, including biphasic PRCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like PRCC. Pathologists should also be aware of the potential mimickers of both low-grade and high-grade PRCCs as well as some new and emerging entities that may show papillary growth that should be excluded in the diagnostic workup. The evolving knowledge of PRCC biomarkers, morphologic patterns, and PRCC variants could also have important implications for clinical management. Lastly, the heterogeneity within the PRCC spectrum needs to be further studied, aiming to better stratify PRCC for appropriate clinical management and systemic therapy.

Comparison of primary and metastatic FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas documents morphologic divergence and potential diagnostic pitfall with peritoneal mesothelioma

Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas are rare neoplasms characterized by a wide morphological heterogeneity and pathogenetic mutations in the FH gene. They often show aggressive behavior with rapid diffusion to distant organs, so novel therapeutic scenarios have been explored, including EGFR inhibitors and PD-L1 expression for targeted immunotherapy. Herein, we investigated a series of eleven primary FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas and seven distant metastases to evaluate tumor heterogeneity even in metastatic sites and estimate the specific spread rates to various organs. Furthermore, the tumors were tested for immunohistochemical PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutations. Most metastatic cases involved the abdominal lymph nodes (4/7, 57%), followed by the peritoneum (3/7, 42%), the liver (2/7, 29%), and the lungs (1/7, 14%). Six metastatic localizations were histologically documented, revealing morphological heterogeneous architecture often differing from the corresponding primary renal tumor. Peritoneal involvement morphologically resembled a benign reactive mesothelial process or primary peritoneal mesothelioma, thus advocating to perform an accurate immunohistochemical panel, including PAX 8 and FH, to reach the proper diagnosis. A pure low-grade SDH-looking primary FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma was also recorded. As for therapy, significant PD-L1 labeling was found in 60% of primary renal tumors, while none of them carried pathogenetic EGFR mutations. Our data show that FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma may be morphologically heterogeneous in metastases as well, which involve the lymph nodes, the liver, and the peritoneum more frequently than other renal tumors. Due to the high frequency of this latter (42%), pathologists should always be concerned about ruling out mesothelial-derived mimickers, and the occurrence of rarer primary low-grade-looking types. Finally, contrary to EGFR mutations, PD-L1 expression could be a possible predictive biomarker for the therapy of these tumors.

Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a novel and uncommon type of renal cell carcinoma, which has been recently recognized and introduced as a distinct entity in the WHO 2022 kidney tumor classification. Previously known as "unclassified RCC", followed by "tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated RCC", ESC-RCC is now a distinct category of kidney tumor, with its own name, with specific clinical manifestations, and a unique morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular profile. Due to its recent introduction and the limited available data, the diagnosis of ESC-RCC is still a complex challenge, and it is probably frequently misdiagnosed. The secret of diagnosing this tumor lies in the pathologists' knowledge, and keeping it up to date through research, thereby limiting the use of outdated nomenclature. The aim of our case-based review is to provide a better understanding of this pathology and to enrich the literature with a new case report, which has some particularities compared to the existing cases.

[2022 WHO classification of renal cell carcinomas: Focus on papillary renal cell carcinoma]

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) represent a group of heterogeneous tumors whose classification has greatly evolved since 1981. The latest update in 2022 classifies all renal cell carcinomas into six categories according to their morphology or the detection of specific molecular alterations. Molecular disassembly of renal cell carcinomas with papillary features has enabled the identification of new entities characterized by a specific molecular alteration, such as Fumarate Hydratase (FH) deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC or TFEB-altered RCC. This new classification allows for a more accurate diagnosis but requires a thorough knowledge of the genomic alterations to search for with immunohistochemical or molecular biology techniques. According to the new WHO 2022 classification, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRC) type 1 or type 2 classification is no longer recommended. A classification based on nucleolar ISUP grade must be preferred: low-grade PRC (ISUP 1-2) or high-grade PRC (ISUP 3-4). The other prognostic factors remain the same: the pTNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, and the presence or absence of dedifferentiated areas referring to sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features. Of note, the presence of necrosis is not currently recognized as a poor prognostic element for this type of carcinoma. The diagnosis of high-grade PRC is from now on a diagnosis of exclusion. It can only be sustained after having ruled out TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, and FH-deficient RCC. For clinicians, the diagnosis of PRC implies suggesting an oncogenetic consultation to screen for an associated genetic tumor syndrome regardless of the patient's age.

Cystic Features in Renal Epithelial Neoplasms and Their Increasing Clinical and Pathologic Significance

Most cystic renal tumors after resection (Boniak IIF to IV cysts) have an indolent course despite the significantly higher proportion of malignant [ie, renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] diagnosis. Most cystic renal tumors have clear cell histology that include cystic clear cell RCC and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCNLMP). There is growing evidence to suggest that MCNLMP, cystic clear cell RCC, and noncystic clear cell RCC form a cystic-to-solid biological spectrum with MCNLMP representing the most indolent form and with cystic clear cell RCC behaving better than noncystic (solid) clear cell RCC. Extensively (>75%) cystic clear cell RCC also has an excellent outcome similar to MCNLMP stressing the need to reevaluate the histologic criteria that separate these 2 cystic clear cell tumors. Other tumors with clear cells that can be extensively cystic such as the recently reclassified noncancerous clear cell papillary renal tumor and the newly described MED15::TFE3 RCC also have indolent course and may mimic MCNLMP. Cystic features occur also in renal tumors with nonclear cell histology including tumors capable of metastasis such as acquired cystic disease-associated, tubulocystic, fumarate hydratase-deficient, and eosinophilic solid and cystic RCCs. Cystic imaging presentation of some renal tumors such as papillary RCC can be attributed in part to pseudocystic necrosis and hemorrhage. It is important to know that tubulocystic RCC may have a lower Bosniak class presentation that overlaps with benign renal cysts (Bosniak I to IIF) that are managed conservatively. This review highlights the cystic renal tumors with clear cell and nonclear cell morphologies including some novel RCC subtypes that may have cystic features. The presence of cystic features and their extent may aid in the classification and prognostication of renal neoplasms underscoring its increasing importance in the pathologic diagnosis and reporting of renal neoplasia.

Renal Cell Carcinoma Associated With TSC/MTOR Genomic Alterations: An Update on its Expanding Spectrum and an Approach to Clinicopathologic Work-up

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)/mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) pathway-related genomic alterations have been classically described in hereditary TSC syndrome setting involving germline mutations, whereby cells with a bi-allelic inactivation of genes originate tumors in a classic tumor-suppressor "two-hit" Knudson paradigm. Initial studies of TSC-associated RCC categorized tumors into 3 broad heterogeneous morphologic groups: RCC with smooth muscle stroma, chromophobe-like, and eosinophilic-macrocytic. Recently, a similar morphologic spectrum has been increasingly recognized in novel and emerging entities characterized by somatic mutations in the TSC1/2 and MTOR in patients who do not suffer from the TSC. Correct recognition of RCC with TSC / MTOR mutations is critical for accurate prognostication because such tumors with aggressive behavior have the potential to be tailored to mTOR inhibitors. Whether TSC/MTOR mutated renal epithelial neoplasms represent a distinct molecular class has been confounded by the fact that TSC1/2 , and the gene encoding the downstream protein MTOR, are mutated secondarily in ∼5% of the more common subtypes of RCC, including the commonest subtype of clear cell RCC. This review summarizes the expanding morphologic spectrum of renal tumors with TSC/mTOR pathway alterations, specifically for sporadically occurring tumors where these genomic alterations likely are primary pathologic events. Finally, a practical surgical pathology approach to handling these tumors, and a conceptual framework of renal epithelial tumors with TSC/MTOR mutations as a "family of tumors", is presented.

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Kinase is a Common Convergent Pathway to Renal Neoplasia: A Contemporary Review

Mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) is a member of the phosphatidylinositol-3-hydroxide kinase (PI3 K)-related protein kinase family that functions as a central regulator of cell growth, metabolism, proliferation, and survival. The role of the TSC-mTOR signaling pathway in kidney tumors has been implicated in some hamartoma syndromes; however, with the advent and wide utilization of molecular studies, a growing number of kidney tumors have been linked to somatic or germline mutations involving genes that encode for this pathway, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, low-grade oncocytic tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma and angiomyolipoma, among others. Herein, we review the contemporary developments of mTOR pathway-related renal neoplasia, focusing on the clinicopathologic features of the tumor entities.

Pathology of hereditary renal cell carcinoma syndromes: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease characterized by hamartomatous tumors involving multiple organs such as the brain, skin, heart, lung and kidney. TSC is caused by inactivating mutations in TSC1/TSC2, which encodes hamartin and tuberin, respectively, and forms a complex that regulates mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), resulting in cell overgrowth and oncogenesis. Since a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in TSC relates to chronic kidney disease and the ability to preserve renal function, this review describes the important pathologic findings in TSC-associated renal neoplasms and their correlating sporadic counterparts. The most common renal tumor in TSC patients are AMLs, followed by a heterogeneous spectrum of renal epithelial tumors, which may provide clues to establishing a diagnosis of TSC.

Kidney cancer: Links between hereditary syndromes and sporadic tumorigenesis

Multiple hereditary syndromes predispose to kidney cancer, including Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, BAP1-Tumor Predisposition Syndrome, Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma Syndrome, Fumarate Hydratase Tumor Predisposition Syndrome, and Cowden syndrome. In some cases, mutations in the genes that cause hereditary kidney cancer are tightly linked to similar histologic features in sporadic RCC. For example, clear cell RCC occurs in the hereditary syndrome VHL, and sporadic ccRCC usually has inactivation of the VHL gene. In contrast, mutations in FLCN, the causative gene for Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, are rarely found in sporadic RCC. Here, we focus on the genes and pathways that link hereditary and sporadic RCC.

"Oncocytoid Renal Cell Carcinomas After Neuroblastoma" Represent TSC -mutated Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinomas : Association With Prior Childhood Malignancy and Multifocality With Therapeutic Implications

The concept of oncocytoid renal cell carcinoma in patients who have survived neuroblastoma as a distinct biologic entity has been controversial since its original description in 1999. This is in part because similar oncocytoid renal cell carcinomas have been described in association with other pediatric cancers, and also because other renal cell carcinoma subtypes (such as MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma) have been described in children who have survived neuroblastoma. We identified an index case of a child who survived medulloblastoma and developed multifocal bilateral oncocytoid renal cell carcinomas with morphology and immunophenotype compatible with eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC) and demonstrated that both neoplasms harbored distinctive mutations in the TSC1/TSC2 genes. Remarkably, the child's remaining bilateral multifocal renal neoplasms completely responded to MTOR inhibitor therapy without need for further surgery. To confirm our hypothesis that oncocytoid renal cell carcinomas after childhood cancer represent ESC RCC, we obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from 2 previously published cases of oncocytoid renal cell carcinoma after neuroblastoma, confirmed that the morphology and immunophenotype was consistent with ESC RCC, and demonstrated that both cases harbored somatic TSC gene mutations. Both expressed markers previously associated with neoplasms harboring TSC gene mutations, glycoprotein nonmetastatic B, and cathepsin K. Of note, one of these patients had 2 ESC RCC which harbored distinctive TSC2 mutations, while the background kidney of the other patient had multiple small cysts lined by similar oncocytoid cells which showed loss of TSC2 protein. We then reviewed 3 of 4 cases from the original 1999 report of oncocytoid renal cell carcinomas after neuroblastoma, found that all 3 demonstrated morphology (including basophilic cytoplasmic stippling) that is characteristic of ESC RCC, showed that all 3 overexpressed glycoprotein nonmetastatic B, and showed that both cases with adequate material demonstrated loss of TSC2 protein and expressed cytokeratin 20 and cathepsin K by immunohistochemistry. In summary, "oncocytoid renal cell carcinomas after neuroblastoma" represent ESC RCC which are often multifocal in patients who have survived childhood cancer, likely representing an incompletely characterized tumor predisposition syndrome. MTOR-targeted therapy represents an effective therapeutic option for such patients to preserve functional nephrons.

mTOR eosinophilic renal cell carcinoma: a distinctive tumor characterized by mTOR mutation, loss of chromosome 1, cathepsin-K expression, and response to target therapy

In the spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms, a subset of tumors with high-grade-appearing histologic features harboring pathogenic mutations in mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and hitherto clinical indolent behavior has been described. Three cases (2F,1 M) with histologically documented metastases (lymph node, skull, and liver) were retrieved and extensively investigated by immunohistochemistry, FISH, and next-generation sequencing. Tumors were composed of eosinophilic cells with prominent nucleoli (G3 by ISUP/WHO) arranged in solid to nested architecture. Additionally, there were larger cells with perinuclear cytoplasmic shrinkage and sparse basophilic Nissl-like granules, superficially resembling the so-called spider cells of cardiac rhabdomyomas. The renal tumors, including the skull and liver metastases, showed immunoexpression PAX8, CK8-18, and cathepsin-K, and negativity for vimentin. NGS identified mTOR genetic alterations in the three cases, including the skull and liver metastases. One patient was then treated with Everolimus (mTOR inhibitors) with clinical response (metastatic tumor shrinkage). We present a distinct renal tumor characterized by high-grade eosinophilic cells, cathepsin-K immunohistochemical expression, and harboring mTOR gene mutations demonstrating a malignant potential and showing responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors.

Recent Advances in Renal Tumors with TSC/mTOR Pathway Abnormalities in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex and in the Sporadic Setting

A spectrum of renal tumors associated with frequent TSC/mTOR (tuberous sclerosis complex/mechanistic target of rapamycin) pathway gene alterations (in both the germline and sporadic settings) have recently been described. These include renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS), eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). Most of these entities have characteristic morphologic and immunohistochemical features that enable their recognition without the need for molecular studies. In this report, we summarize recent advances and discuss their evolving complexity.

A rare case of eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma in a 48-year-old woman: Case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND SIGNIFICANCE

This is (ESC RCC) a rare renal tumor that was thought to occur exclusively in female patients and almost exclusively in TSC patients. The tumor does not have distinctive clinical symptoms or radiological manifestations that are important for distinguishing it from other tumors or renal formations, but it has unique features and distinct histological characteristics that allow us to distinguish it from other tumors. Despite its slow growth, it sometimes metastasizes to other parts of the body. Surgical interventions are treated by examining tissue samples that show the characteristic features of the tumor.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a patient who complained of mild flank pain without other associated symptoms. She was successfully treated in our hospital and followed up for 8 months without any problems.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

This tumor generally has slow growth and good prognosis and is often detected at an early stage. However, when confronted with this tumor, good surgical excision with a full body scan is necessary to rule out the presence of metastases, monitor the patient well, and act decisively despite the good warning of this tumor, as we have not yet achieved complete visualization of this formation. Neoplastic.

CONCLUSION

By studying the successive reports of this unique tumor, this manuscript will help document our case and review the literature on this tumor to try to understand this tumor formation in the hope of achieving the best medical care for these patients.

Kidney Tumors: New and Emerging Kidney Tumor Entities

This review summarizes current knowledge on several novel and emerging renal entities, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC. Their clinical features, gross and microscopic morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular and genetic features are described. The diagnosis of most of them rests on recognizing their morphologic features using immunohistochemistry. Accurate diagnosis of these entitles will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors" and will lead to better clinical management and improved patient prognostication.

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma with TSC2 mutation: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is an under-recognized, emerging new entity of sporadic renal neoplasms, which is listed as a rare type of renal cell carcinoma in the 2022 WHO renal tumor classification. It is easily misdiagnosed because its characteristics are insufficiently understood.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report one case of ESC-RCC, a 53-year-old female patient with a right kidney mass found during clinical examination. The patient experienced no discomforting symptoms. Computer-tomography imaging at our urinary department showed a round soft tissue density shadow around the right kidney. Microscopic examination revealed a tumor displaying a solid-cystic composition of eosinophilic cells with unique features, revealed by characteristic immunohistochemical markers (CK20-positive/CK7-negative), and a nonsense mutation in TSC2. Ten months after the renal tumor resection, the patient presented in good condition with no recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinct morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics of ESC-RCC we describe here, based on our case and the relevant literature, highlight the key points of the pathological and differential diagnosis of this novel renal neoplasm. Our findings will therefore deepen our understanding of this novel renal neoplasm and help reduce misdiagnosis.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma with focal psammomatous calcifications: a rare occurrence mimicking translocation carcinoma

AIMS

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear cells and psammoma-like calcifications would often raise suspicion for MITF family translocation RCC. However, we have rarely encountered tumours consistent with clear cell RCC that contain focal psammomatous calcifications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified clear cell RCCs with psammomatous calcifications from multiple institutions and performed immunohistochemistry and fluorescence and RNA in-situ hybridisation (FISH and RNA ISH). Twenty-one tumours were identified: 12 men, nine women, aged 45-83 years. Tumour size was 2.3-14.0 cm (median = 6.75 cm). Nucleolar grade was 3 (n = 14), 2 (n = 4) or 4 (n = 3). In addition to clear cell pattern, morphology included eosinophilic (n = 12), syncytial giant cell (n = 4), rhabdoid (n = 2), branched glandular (n = 1), early spindle cell (n = 1) and poorly differentiated components (n = 1). Labelling for CA9 was usually 80-100% of the tumour cells (n = 17 of 21), but was sometimes decreased in areas of eosinophilic cells (n = 4). All (19 of 19) were positive for CD10. Most (19 of 20) were positive for AMACR (variable staining = 20-100%). Staining was negative for keratin 7, although four showed rare positive cells (four of 20). Results were negative for cathepsin K (none of 19), melan A (none of 17), HMB45 (none of 17), TFE3 (none of 5), TRIM63 RNA ISH (none of 13), and TFE3 (none of 19) and TFEB rearrangements (none of 12). Seven of 19 (37%) showed chromosome 3p deletion. One (one of 19) showed trisomy 7 and 17 without papillary features.

CONCLUSIONS

Psammomatous calcifications in RCC with a clear cell pattern suggests a diagnosis of MITF family translocation RCC; however, psammomatous calcifications can rarely be found in true clear cell RCC.

Renal Cell Carcinoma in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Retrospective Study in Patients from Hungary

INTRODUCTION

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) are known risk factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Hereby, the clinicopathological features of RCCs developed in ESRD were investigated.

METHODS

A database consisting of 34 tumors from 31 patients with ESRD among 2,566 nephrectomy samples of RCC was built. The demographic, clinical, and follow-up data along with pathological parameters were analyzed. The RCCs were diagnosed according to the current WHO Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumors.

RESULTS

Twenty-two tumors developed in men and 12 in women, with a median age of 56 years (range: 27-75 years). The causes of ESRD were glomerulonephritis (n = 7), hypertensive kidney disease (n = 6), autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (n = 6), chronic pyelonephritis (n = 4), diabetic nephropathy (n = 3), chemotherapy-induced nephropathy (n = 1), and undetermined (n = 4). ACKD complicated ESRD in 12 patients. The following histological subtypes were identified: clear cell RCC (n = 19), papillary RCC (n = 5), clear cell papillary tumor (n = 5), ACKD RCC (n = 3), and eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC (n = 2). The median tumor size was 31 mm (range: 10-80 mm), and 32 tumors were confined to the kidney (pT1-pT2). There was no tumor-specific death during the period of this study. Progression was registered in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, the most common RCC subtype was clear cell RCC (55%), with a frequency that exceeded international data appreciably (14-25%). The incidence of clear cell papillary tumor and ACKD RCC (14.7% and 8.5%) was lower than data reported in the literature (30% and 40%). Our results indicate a favorable prognosis of RCC in ESRD.

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: a review of literature focused on radiological findings and differential diagnosis

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a rare type of renal cell carcinoma with inert biological behavior that has not yet been included in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, and its imaging manifestations are unclear due to its rarity. Although there have only been a few cases, the CT and MRI findings of ESC-RCC are characterized by its cystic solid structure, according to the proportion of cystic and solid components observed on images, ESC-RCC can be categorized into three types. Especially the Type I, when the cystic-solid components are almost equal, the imaging findings are illustrated as "lotus root-like," which may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of ESC-RCC from other types of renal tumors. In fact, ESC-RCC has diverse radiological appearances, and the differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, renal oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and renal angiomyolipoma remains challenging. This review aims to discuss ESC-RCC with a focus on the radiological findings and differential diagnosis of ESC-RCC.

Low-grade oncocytic tumour of the kidney is characterised by genetic alterations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR or PIK3CA and consistent GATA3 positivity

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) of the kidney has recently emerged as a potential novel tumour type. Despite similarity to oncocytoma or eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, it shows diffuse keratin 7 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and negative KIT (CD117), which differs from both. We aimed to identify the molecular characteristics of these tumours. Seventeen tumours (one male, 16 female, nine previously published) fitting the original description of this entity (solid eosinophilic cell morphology, often with areas of tumour cells loosely stretched in oedematous stroma, and the above IHC features) were analysed with a next-generation sequencing panel of 324 cancer-associated genes from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. All tumours harboured at least one alteration in either TSC1 (n = 7, 41%), TSC2 (n = 2, 12%), MTOR (n = 5, 29%) or PIK3CA (n = 4, 24%). Four tumours harboured a second alteration, including two NF2, one each in conjunction with MTOR and TSC2 alterations, one PTEN with TSC1 alteration and one tumour with both MTOR and TSC1 alterations. No other renal cancer-related or recurring gene alterations were identified. In addition to the previously described IHC findings, 16 of 16 were positive for GATA3. Eleven patients with follow-up had no metastases or recurrent tumours. Recurrent tuberous sclerosis/MTOR pathway gene alterations in LOT support its consideration as a distinct morphological, immunohistochemical and genetic entity. PIK3CA is another pathway member that may be altered in these tumours. Further study will be necessary to determine whether tumour behaviour or syndromic associations differ from those of oncocytoma and chromophobe carcinoma, warranting different clinical consideration.

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: a single Indian tertiary center experience of three cases of a newly described entity

Background

Among adult malignant tumors, renal cell carcinoma accounts for 2–3% and has the worst prognosis among common urologic tumors. Recently, an eosinophilic, solid and cystic (ESC) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histological subtype has been described and proposed as an entity separate than the 16 subtypes described in the 2016 WHO classification. The aim of the present study is to share our experience of three such cases of this newly described entity.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our cases of renal cell carcinoma and describe the presentation, diagnosis and management with follow-up details of ESC RCC.

Results

Our three patients presented at an advanced stage with flank pain or mass, and one patient had metastasis. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy, diagnosis proved by histopathological examination with immunohistochemistry (IHC), with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm in all three cases. On IHC, CK 20 was positive in two cases and one patient with CK 20, CK 7 negative and PAX 8 positive.

Conclusions

ESC RCC is a newly described entity, with increasing incidence probably due to better diagnosis. Previously, 66 such cases are described, with female predominance, lower stage and indolent behavior. Only four cases with metastasis are described.

Kidney Tumors: New and Emerging Kidney Tumor Entities

This review summarizes current knowledge on several novel and emerging renal entities, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC. Their clinical features, gross and microscopic morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular and genetic features are described. The diagnosis of most of them rests on recognizing their morphologic features using immunohistochemistry. Accurate diagnosis of these entitles will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors" and will lead to better clinical management and improved patient prognostication.

Tumors masquerading as type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma: pathologists' ever-expanding differential diagnosis for a heterogeneous group of entities

Although papillary renal cell carcinoma has historically been classified as either type 1 or type 2, data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has demonstrated significant genomic heterogeneity in tumors classified as "type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma" (T2PRCC). Papillary renal cell carcinoma is expected to have a favorable clinical course compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). However, tumors with poor outcome more similar to CCRCC were included in the T2PRCC cohort studied by the TCGA. The differential diagnosis for T2PRCC includes a variety of other renal tumors, including aggressive entities such as TFE3 translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, high-grade CCRCC, and collecting duct carcinoma. Accurate classification of these tumors is important for prognostication and selection of therapy.

How New Developments Impact Diagnosis in Existing Renal Neoplasms

In recent years, several emerging diagnostic entities have been described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, our understanding of well-known and established entities has also grown. Clear cell papillary RCC is now relabeled as a tumor rather than carcinoma in view of its nonaggressive behavior. Renal tumors with a predominantly infiltrative pattern are very important for recognition, as most of these have aggressive behavior, including fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC, SMARCB1-deficient medullary carcinoma, collecting duct carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and metastases from other cancers.

Contemporary Clinical Definitions, Differential Diagnosis, and Novel Predictive Tools for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Despite significant progress regarding clinical detection/imaging evaluation modalities and genetic/molecular characterization of pathogenesis, advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains an incurable disease and overall RCC mortality has been steadily rising for decades. Concomitantly, clinical definitions have been greatly nuanced and refined. RCCs are currently viewed as a heterogeneous series of cancers, with the same anatomical origin, but fundamentally different metabolisms and clinical behaviors. Thus, RCC pathological diagnosis/subtyping guidelines have become increasingly intricate and cumbersome, routinely requiring ancillary studies, mainly immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, RCC-associated-antigen targeted systemic therapy has been greatly diversified and emerging, novel clinical applications for RCC immunotherapy have already reported significant survival benefits, at least in the adjuvant setting. Even so, systemically disseminated RCCs still associate very poor clinical outcomes, with currently available therapeutic modalities only being able to prolong survival. In lack of a definitive cure for advanced RCCs, integration of the amounting scientific knowledge regarding RCC pathogenesis into RCC clinical management has been paramount for improving patient outcomes. The current review aims to offer an integrative perspective regarding contemporary RCC clinical definitions, proper RCC clinical work-up at initial diagnosis (semiology and multimodal imaging), RCC pathological evaluation, differential diagnosis/subtyping protocols, and novel clinical tools for RCC screening, risk stratification and therapeutic response prediction.

TSC/MTOR -associated Eosinophilic Renal Tumors Exhibit a Heterogeneous Clinicopathologic Spectrum : A Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Gene Expression Profiling Study

BACKGROUND

Several TSC1/2- or MTOR -mutated eosinophilic renal tumor subsets are emerging, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumors (EVTs) and low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOTs). "Unclassified renal tumors with TSC/MTOR mutations" ( TSC -mt RCC-NOS) do not meet the criteria for other histomolecular subtypes. Whether these tumors represent a continuum of 1 TS C/ MTOR -mutation-associated disease is unknown.

DESIGN

We evaluated the clinicopathologic and IHC profiles of 39 eosinophilic renal tumors with targeted DNA sequencing-confirmed TSC/MTOR mutations. Twenty-eight of these, plus 6 ChRCC, 5 RO, 5 ccRCC, 7 MiT RCC and 6 normal renal tissues, were profiled transcriptionally by RNA-seq.

RESULTS

The 39 cases were reclassified based on morphological and IHC features as ESC RCC (12), EVT (9), LOT, (8) and TSC -mt RCC-NOS (10). The mutation profiles demonstrated consistency; ESC RCCs (12/12) had TSC mutations, and most LOTs (7/8) had MTOR mutations. Ten TSC -mt RCC-NOSs exhibited heterogeneous morphology, arising a differential diagnosis with other renal tumors, including MiT RCC, PRCC and epithelioid PEComa. RNA sequencing-based clustering segregated ESC RCC, EVT and LOT from each other and other renal tumors, indicating expression profile-level differences. Most TSC- mt RCC-NOSs (6/7) formed a mixed cluster with ESC RCC, indicating similar expression signatures; one TSC- mt RCC-NOS with unusual biphasic morphology clustered with EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

We expanded the TSC/MTOR -associated eosinophilic renal tumor morphologic spectrum, identified gene mutation characteristics, and highlighted differential diagnosis challenges, especially with MiT RCC. ESC RCC, EVT, and LOT having distinct expression profiles. TSC -mt RCC-NOS may cluster with recognized TSC/MTOR -associated entities.

Algorithm-Based Approach to the Histological Routine Diagnosis of Renal Oncocytic Tumors in Core Biopsy Specimens

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A growing number of tumor entities with badly defined limits are enlarging in the last years the family of oncocytic tumors in the kidney.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO) are classically well-known tumors, but the borderland between them, and their precise connection, remains a matter of debate. Aside from that, other emerging and provisional entities, like eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRRP), have been recently described. This spectrum of tumors remains a diagnostic challenge in renal pathology, especially if the specimen obtained is scarce. This review focuses on practical diagnostic problems when managing core biopsies and proposes a diagnostic algorithm maximizing the information provided by both morphology and immunohistochemistry. So, a combination of morphologic features on hematoxylin-eosin and six antibodies (CK7, CD117, CK20, CD10, GATA-3, and cathepsin K) is advised to be used in a stepwise fashion.

The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urogenital tumours (WHO "Blue Book"), published in 2022, contains significant revisions. This review summarises the most relevant changes for renal, penile, and testicular tumours. In keeping with other volumes in the fifth edition series, the WHO classification of urogenital tumours follows a hierarchical classification and lists tumours by site, category, family, and type. The section "essential and desirable diagnostic criteria" included in the WHO fifth edition represents morphologic diagnostic criteria, combined with immunohistochemistry and relevant molecular tests. The global introduction of massive parallel sequencing will result in a diagnostic shift from morphology to molecular analyses. Therefore, a molecular-driven renal tumour classification has been introduced, taking recent discoveries in renal tumour genomics into account. Such novel molecularly defined epithelial renal tumours include SMARCB1-deficient medullary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFEB-altered RCC, Alk-rearranged RCC, and ELOC-mutated RCC. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC is a novel morphologically defined RCC entity. The diverse morphologic patterns of penile squamous cell carcinomas are grouped as human papillomavirus (HPV) associated and HPV independent, and there is an attempt to simplify the morphologic classification. A new chapter with tumours of the scrotum has been introduced. The main nomenclature of testicular tumours is retained, including the use of the term "germ cell neoplasia in situ" (GCNIS) for the preneoplastic lesion of most germ cell tumours and division from those not derived from GCNIS. Nomenclature changes include replacement of the term "primitive neuroectodermal tumour" by "embryonic neuroectodermal tumour" to separate these tumours clearly from Ewing sarcoma. The term "carcinoid" has been changed to "neuroendocrine tumour", with most examples in the testis now classified as "prepubertal type testicular neuroendocrine tumour".

Low grade oncocytic tumors of the kidney: a clinically relevant approach for the workup and accurate diagnosis

Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were accepted as unique renal tumors in the late 1990s. Since their formal description, criteria for diagnosis have evolved and additional distinct tumor subtypes originally considered as one these two entities are now recognized. The last two decades have witnessed unprecedented interest in the spectrum of low grade oncocytic renal neoplasms in three specific areas: (1) histologic characterization of tumors with overlapping morphologic features between oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; (2) description of potentially unique entities within this spectrum, such as eosinophilic vacuolated tumor and low-grade oncocytic tumor; and (3) better appreciation of the association between a subset of low grade oncocytic tumors and hereditary renal neoplasia. While this important work has been academically rewarding, the proposal of several histologic entities with overlapping morphologic and immunophenotypic features (which may require esoteric adjunctive immunohistochemical and/or molecular techniques for confirmation) has created frustration in the diagnostic pathology and urology community as information evolves regarding classification within this spectrum of renal neoplasia. Pathologists, including genitourinary subspecialists, are often uncertain as to the "best practice" diagnostic approach to such tumors. In this review, we present a practical clinically relevant algorithmic approach to classifying tumors within the low grade oncocytic family of renal neoplasia, including a proposal for compressing terminology for evolving categories where appropriate without sacrificing prognostic relevance.

WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems contains relevant revisions and introduces a group of molecularly defined renal tumour subtypes. Herein we present the World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 perspectives on papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on their evolving classification, differential diagnosis, and emerging entities. The WHO 2022 classification eliminated the type 1/2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subcategorization, given the recognition of frequent mixed tumour phenotypes and the existence of entities with a different molecular background within the type 2 pRCC category. Additionally, emerging entities such as biphasic squamoid alveolar RCC, biphasic hyalinising psammomatous RCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like pRCC are included as part of the pRCC spectrum, while additional morphological and molecular data are being gathered. In addition to oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), a category of 'other oncocytic tumours' with oncocytoma/chRCC-like features has been introduced, including emerging entities, most with TSC/mTOR pathway alterations (eosinophilic vacuolated tumour and so-called 'low-grade' oncocytic tumour), deserving additional research. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC was accepted as a new and independent tumour entity. Finally, a highly reproducible and clinically relevant universal grading system for chRCC is still missing and is another niche of ongoing investigation. This review discusses these developments and highlights emerging morphological and molecular data relevant for the classification of renal cell carcinoma.

The 2022 revision of World Health Organization classification of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs: advances and challenges

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urinary and male genital organ tumors has been recently published in 2022. The application of molecular profiling has made a substantial impact on classification of urologic tumors. The new WHO classification introduces a group of molecularly well-defined renal tumor subtypes. The significant changes include addition of a category of "other oncocytic tumors" with oncocytoma/chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC)-like features, elimination of the subcategorization of type1/2 papillary RCC and inclusion of eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC as an independent tumor entity. The WHO/ISUP grading now has been recommended for all RCCs. Major nomenclature changes include replacement of histologic 'variants' by 'subtypes', 'clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma' to 'clear cell renal cell tumor','TCEB1-mutated RCC' to 'ELOC-mutated RCC', 'hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma' to 'fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC', 'RCC-Unclassified' to 'RCC-NOS', 'primitive neuroectodermal tumor' to 'embryonic neuroectodermal tumor', 'testicular carcinoid' to 'testicular neuroendocrine tumor', and 'basal cell carcinoma of the prostate' to 'adenoid-cystic (basal-cell) carcinoma of the prostate'. Metastatic, hematolymphoid, mesenchymal, melanocytic, soft tissue and neuroendocrine tumors are collectively discussed in separate chapters. It has been suggested that the morphological classification of urothelial cancer be replaced with a new molecular taxonomic classification system.

Xanthomatous Giant Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Another Morphologic Form of TSC-associated Renal Cell Carcinoma

Over the past decade, several distinct novel renal epithelial neoplasms driven by underlying tuberous sclerosis comples (TSC)/mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) pathway mutations have been described. We report herein two distinctive TSC2-mutated renal cell carcinomas which do not fit any previously described entity. The two renal carcinomas occurred in young patients (ages 10 and 31 y), and were characterized by highly permeative growth within the kidney with metastases to perirenal lymph nodes. The neoplastic cells were predominantly large, multinucleated giant cells having variably eosinophilic to xanthomatous cytoplasm with basophilic stippling and frequent vacuolization. While the discohesive nature of the neoplastic cells, xanthomatous cytoplasm, immunoreactivity for histiocytic markers and minimal immunoreactivity for conventional epithelial markers raised the possibility of a histiocytic neoplasm, multifocal immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 20 helped establish their epithelial nature. Despite the aggressive growth pattern of these neoplasms and lymph node metastases, mitotic figures were rare and Ki-67 indices were low (<1%). One patient with follow-up shows no evidence of disease seven years after nephrectomy with no adjuvant therapy. Next-generation sequencing demonstrated TSC2 mutations in each case. By immunohistochemistry, downstream markers of mTOR pathway activation S6K1, 4EBP1, and glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B were all highly expressed in these neoplasms, suggesting mTOR pathway activation as the neoplastic driver. While the cytokeratin 20 immunoreactivity and focal basophilic cytoplasmic stippling suggest a relationship to eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, and cytoplasmic vacuolization suggests a relationship to eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, these neoplasms appear to be distinctive given their permeative growth patterns and predominant xanthomatous giant cell morphology. Addition of cytokeratin 20 to a panel of epithelial markers helps avoid misdiagnosis in such cases.

18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT Findings in a Patient With Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma

ABSTRACT

A 26-year-old woman was incidentally discovered to have bilateral renal tumors on ultrasound, and percutaneous biopsy of the right kidney lesion proved eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma. 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated hyperdense or isodense lesions on CT without FDG uptake, whereas 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT fusion images showed tumors with increased 99mTc-MIBI uptake. This case indicates that the 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT is a potential method for the differentiation of renal tumor with eosinophilic features from other renal tumor histology.

Updates in Grading of Renal Cell Carcinomas Beyond Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and papillary RCC using the WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, which is primarily based on nuclear features. As the spectrum of RCC continues to evolve, with more recently described subtypes in the past decade, literature evidence on grading these subtypes is limited or not available for some tumor types. Herein, we outline a pragmatic approach to the topic of grading RCC, dividing the contemporarily described RCC subtypes into 7 categories based on the potential clinical applicability of grading as a useful prognostic parameter: (1) RCC subtypes that are reasonably validated and recommended for WHO/ISUP grading; (2) RCC subtypes where WHO/ISUP is not applicable; (3) RCC subtypes where WHO/ISUP grading is potentially clinically useful; (4) inherently aggressive RCC subtypes where histologic classification itself confers an aggressive biologic potential; (5) renal epithelial tumors where WHO/ISUP grading provides potentially misleading prognostic implication; (6) renal epithelial neoplasms where low WHO/ISUP grade features are a prerequisite for accurate histologic classification; and (7) renal epithelial neoplasms with no or limited data on grading or incomplete understanding of the biologic potential. Our aim in outlining this approach is 2-fold: (a) identify the gaps in understanding and application of grading in RCC subtypes so that researchers in the field may perform additional studies on the basis of which the important pathologic function of assignment of grade may be recommended to be performed as a meaningful exercise across a wider spectrum of RCC; and (b) to provide guidance in the interim to surgical pathologists in terms of providing clinically useful grading information in RCC based on currently available clinicopathologic information.

Imaging features of eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: An additional case report of a novel tumor entity

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC) is a special classification of indolent kidney tumors newly discovered in recent years. It is extremely uncommon, with only a few clinical and pathological reports, and its imaging description are very rare. Here, we present a case of ESC RCC.

∙

ESC RCC typically presents with a solid, multifocal, well-demarcated lesion.

∙

ESC RCC showed a clear homogenous enhancement pattern in the contrast-enhanced CT.

∙

CK20 is the most important diagnostic marker for ESC RCC.

Evaluating Established Roles, Future Perspectives and Methodological Heterogeneity for Wilms’ Tumor 1 (WT1) Antigen Detection in Adult Renal Cell Carcinoma, Using a Novel N-Terminus Targeted Antibody (Clone WT49)

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is arguably the deadliest form of genitourinary malignancy and is nowadays viewed as a heterogeneous series of cancers, with the same origin but fundamentally different metabolisms and clinical behaviors. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is increasingly necessary for RCC subtyping and definitive diagnosis. WT1 is a complex gene involved in carcinogenesis. To address reporting heterogeneity and WT1 IHC standardization, we used a recent N-terminus targeted monoclonal antibody (clone WT49) to evaluate WT1 protein expression in 56 adult RCC (aRCC) cases. This is the largest WT1 IHC investigation focusing exclusively on aRCCs and the first report on clone WT49 staining in aRCCs. We found seven (12.5%) positive cases, all clear cell RCCs, showing exclusively nuclear staining for WT1. We did not disregard cytoplasmic staining in any of the negative cases. Extratumoral fibroblasts, connecting tubules and intratumoral endothelial cells showed the same exclusively nuclear WT1 staining pattern. We reviewed WT1 expression patterns in aRCCs and the possible explanatory underlying metabolomics. For now, WT1 protein expression in aRCCs is insufficiently investigated, with significant discrepancies in the little data reported. Emerging WT1-targeted RCC immunotherapy will require adequate case selection and sustained efforts to standardize the quantification of tumor-associated antigens for aRCC and its many subtypes.

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinomas with TFEB alterations: a comparative study

AIMS

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC) is a recently described renal tumour entity with frequent CK20 positivity, commonly harbouring TSC mutations. In contrast, frequency of CK20 expression and presence of TSC mutations are unclear in TFEB-amplified RCC and TFEB-translocated RCC, which frequently express Melan A. Herein, we provide a comparative analysis of 6 ESC RCC with 4 TFEB-amplified/translocated RCC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed the frequency of CK20 and Melan A expression by immunohistochemistry, and of TSC mutations by next generation sequencing. TFEB alterations were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). All tumours showed voluminous eosinophilic cells with granular cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli, and most showed admixture of solid and cystic areas. CK20 expression was found in all 6 ESC RCC and in all RCCs with TFEB alterations. Melan A positivity was identified in 5/6 ESC RCC and 4/4 RCC with TFEB alterations. We found TSC mutations in 2 ESC RCCs, including in one case also harbouring a CIC fusion, and identified a TSC mutation in one TFEB-amplified RCC.

CONCLUSIONS

ESC RCC represents an emerging renal tumour entity with some histological, immunohistochemical and molecular overlap to TFEB-amplified/translocated RCC. FISH for TFEB aids in this differential diagnosis in challenging cases.

The Pathologic and Molecular Genetic Landscape of the Hereditary Renal Cancer Predisposition Syndromes

It is estimated that 5-8% of renal tumors are hereditary in nature with many inherited as autosomal dominant. These tumors carry a unique spectrum of pathologic and molecular alterations, the knowledge of which is expanding in the recent years. Indebted to this knowledge, many advances in treatment of these tumors have been achieved. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the genetic renal neoplasia syndromes, the clinical and pathologic presentations, their molecular pathogenesis, the advances in therapeutic implications and targeted therapy.

Unclassified Oncocytic Renal Neoplasm with Rib and Liver Metastases: Metastatic Oncocytoma?

Renal tumors with oncocytic or chromophobe-like morphology can be a common source of diagnostic difficulty. In some series, they constitute the largest group of unclassified renal cell carcinomas, a term used for neoplasms that do not fit the current classification of renal tumors. We describe the histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings of an eosinophilic renal neoplasm which presented with rib and liver metastases, and provide a review of the literature. The possibility of a renal oncocytoma with metastases was initially considered but excluded on the basis of several morphological and immunohistochemical features. Additionally, the tumor did not correspond with other traditional or newly emerging categories of renal neoplasms. It was therefore regarded as an unclassified oncocytic renal neoplasm which demonstrated evidence of malignant potential due to the presence of multiple metastases.

NKX6-1 Is a Less Sensitive But Specific Biomarker of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

NKX6-1 is a transcription factor that plays a key role in the development, differentiation, and identity maintenance of beta cells of pancreatic islets. Although NKX6-1 expression has also been discovered in pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs) and duodenal WDNETs, its expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is unexplored. Analysis of mRNA expression and immunohistochemistry of NKX6-1 was performed using the kidney cancer cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and paraffin-embedded whole-tissue slides from our 196 collected cases, including 48 chRCCs (43 classic and 5 eosinophilic subtypes), 24 renal oncocytomas (ROs), 46 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 41 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 14 renal urothelial carcinomas, 7 low-grade oncocytic renal tumors (LOTs), 8 eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas, 3 succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinomas, and 5 renal oncocytic tumors, not otherwise specified. NKX6-1 expression was almost exclusively upregulated in chRCC at both the mRNA and protein levels compared with other renal tumors. NKX6-1 was immunohistochemically positive in 39 of 48 (81.3%) chRCCs, but negative in 46 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 24 ROs, 7 low-grade oncocytic renal tumors, 8 eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas, 3 succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinomas, and 5 renal oncocytic tumors, not otherwise specified. Diffuse, moderate, and focal NKX6-1 staining were seen in 21, 4, and 14 of the 39 chRCCs, respectively. In contrast, NKX6-1 was focally positive in only 1 of 41 (2.4%) papillary renal cell carcinomas and 2 of 14 (14.3%) renal urothelial carcinomas. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of NKX6-1 staining were 81.3% and 98% for chRCC, respectively. In conclusion, NKX6-1 may be a novel potential marker for differentiating chRCC from other renal neoplasms, especially from RO.

Renal cell carcinoma in children and adolescents: A retrospective study of a French-Italian series of 93 cases

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinomas represent 2 to 5% of kidney malignancies in children and adolescents. Appropriate diagnostic and classification are crucial for the correct management of the patients and in order to avoid inappropriate preoperative chemotherapy, which is usually recommended if a Wilms tumor is suspected.

METHODS

a French-Italian series of 93 renal cell carcinomas collected from 1990 to 2019 in patients aged less than 18 years old was reclassified according to the 2016 WHO classification and the latest literature. TFE3 and TFEB FISH analyses and a panel of immunohistochemical stains were applied.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 11 years (range: 9 months - 17 years). MiT family (MiTF) translocation renal cell carcinomas accounted for 52% of the tumors, followed by papillary renal cell carcinomas (20%) and unclassified renal cell carcinomas (13%). Other subtypes, such as SDHB-deficient and Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinomas, represented 1 to 3% of the cases. We also described a case of ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma with a metanephric adenoma-like morphology.

CONCLUSION

A precise histological diagnosis is mandatory as targeted therapy could be applied for some RCC subtypes, i.e., MiTF-translocation and ALK-translocation renal cell carcinomas. Moreover, some RCC subtypes may be associated with a predisposition syndrome that will impact patients' and family's management and genetic counseling. A precise RCC subtype is also mandatory for the clinical management of the patients and the inclusion in new prospective clinical trials.

Oncocytic renal neoplasms with diffuse keratin 7 immunohistochemistry harbor frequent alterations in the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway

Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) has been recently proposed as a unique renal tumor. However, we have encountered tumors with more oncocytoma-like morphology that show diffuse keratin 7 reactivity, which we sought to characterize molecularly. Eighteen tumors with a diffuse keratin 7 positive and KIT negative pattern were identified from 184 with predominantly oncocytoma-like histology. These tumors were subjected to detailed immunohistochemical evaluation and 14 were evaluated using the Illumina^® HiSeq 4000 platform for 324 cancer-associated genes. Patients' ages ranged from 39 to 80 (median = 59.5 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.25:1. Morphology was predominantly oncocytoma-like with discrete nests, compared to the solid and edematous patterns described in LOT. Other than positive keratin 7 and negative KIT, the tumor cells were positive for PAX8, E-cadherin, AE1/AE3, Ber-EP4, AMACR, CD10, and MOC31, and were negative for other studied markers. FH and INI1 were normal. Eleven of 14 harbored genomic abnormalities, likely sporadic, primarily involving the MTOR pathway (73%). Overall, the alterations included MTOR activating mutation (n = 1), TSC1 inactivating mutation (n = 1), TSC2 mutation (p.X534 splice site, n = 1), STK11 (a negative regulator of the MTOR pathway) mutation (n = 1), both STK11 and TSC1 mutations (n = 1), biallelic loss of PTEN and TSC1 deletion (n = 1), and MET amplification and TSC1 inactivating mutation (n = 1). Amplification of FGFR3 was identified in one additional tumor. Other alterations included FOXP1 loss (n = 1), NF2 E427 homozygous loss (n = 1), and PI3KCA activating mutation (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 68 months (2-147 months) for 15 patients, all were alive without disease. Oncocytic renal tumors with diffuse keratin 7 labeling show frequent alterations in the TSC/MTOR pathway, despite more oncocytoma-like morphology than initially described in LOT, likely expanding the morphologic spectrum of the latter.