Further Exploration of the Complexities of Large B-Cell Lymphomas With MYC Abnormalities and the Importance of a Blastoid Morphology

New classifications of B-cell neoplasms: a comparison of 5th WHO and International Consensus classifications

In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a new classification of lymphoid neoplasms, a revision of the previously used Revised 4th Edition of their classification (WHO-4R). However, this means that two classifications are now in simultaneous use: the 5th Edition of the WHO classification (WHO-5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Instead of a comprehensive review of each disease entity, as already described elsewhere, this review focuses on revisions made in both the WHO-5 and ICC from WHO-4R and discrepancies between them regarding B-cell neoplasms. Similarities include cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, cold agglutinin disease, non-primary effusion lymphoma-type effusion-based lymphoma, and gray zone lymphoma. Differences include plasma cell neoplasms, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (double hit lymphoma), follicular lymphoma, LPD with immune deficiency and dysregulation, extranodal large B-cell lymphoma, transformations of indolent B-cell lymphomas, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Understanding the similarities and differences between the two latest classifications will aid daily diagnostic practice and future research on lymphoid neoplasms.

Transformation of marginal zone lymphoma into high-grade B-cell lymphoma expressing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase: A case report

BACKGROUND

High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) is an unusual malignancy that includes myelocytomatosis viral oncogene (MYC), B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), and/or BCL-6 rearrangements, termed double-hit or triple-hit lymphomas, and HGBL-not otherwise specific (HGBL-NOS), which are morphologically characteristic of HGBL but lack MYC, BCL-2, or BCL-6 rearrangements. HGBL is partially transformed by follicular lymphoma and other indolent lymphoma, with few cases of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) transformation. HGBL often has a poor prognosis and intensive therapy is currently mainly advocated, but there is no good treatment for these patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

We reported a case of MZL transformed into HGBL-NOS with TP53 mutation and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase expression. Gene analysis revealed the gene expression profile was identical in the pre- and post-transformed tissues, suggesting that the two diseases are homologous, not secondary tumors. The chemotherapy was ineffective and the side effect was severe, so we tried combination therapy including venetoclax and obinutuzumab. The patient tolerated treatment well, and reached partial response. The patient had recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and died of multifunctional organ failure. He survived for 12 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax combined with obinutuzumab might improve the survival in some HGBL patients, who are unsuitable for chemotherapy.

High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, presenting as primary peritoneal lymphomatosis and successfully treated with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R

Peritoneal lymphomatosis (PL) is a rare lymphoma-associated condition defined as the dissemination of lymphoma cells in the peritoneum. An 82-year-old man presented with abdominal pain, heartburn, and high fever. Radiological findings, including positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), and gastrointestinal fiberscopy, showed diffuse thickening of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery; however, no lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, or gastrointestinal lesions were observed. Under suspicion of peritonitis carcinomatosa of unknown origin, exploratory laparoscopy was performed that revealed multiple white nodules and masses on the surfaces of the peritoneum, mesentery, and intestinal serosa. The histopathological and cytogenetic findings of the peritoneum revealed high-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, and a gain of MYC by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The patient was treated with two cycles of R-CHOP therapy, followed by six cycles of dose-adjusted EPOCH-R therapy, and a complete metabolic response was confirmed by PET-CT. Since there are no specific radiological findings to confirm the diagnosis of PL, a histopathological diagnosis is usually required. Most PL exhibit an aggressive lymphoma phenotype and can be cured by appropriate chemotherapy. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are desirable.

The fifth edition of the WHO classification of mature B-cell neoplasms: open questions for research

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM5) is the product of an evidence-based evolution of the revised fourth edition with wide multidisciplinary consultation. Nonetheless, while every classification incorporates scientific advances and aims to improve upon the prior version, medical knowledge remains incomplete and individual neoplasms may not be easily subclassified in a given scheme. Thus, optimal classification requires ongoing study, and there are certain aspects of some entities and subtypes that require further refinements. In this review, we highlight a selection of these challenging areas to prompt more research investigations. These include (1) a 'placeholder term' of splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukaemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN) to accommodate many of the splenic lymphomas previously classified as hairy cell leukaemia variant and B-prolymphocytic leukaemia, a clear new start to define their pathobiology; (2) how best to classify BCL2 rearrangement negative follicular lymphoma including those with BCL6 rearrangement, integrating the emerging new knowledge on various germinal centre B-cell subsets; (3) what is the spectrum of non-IG gene partners of MYC translocation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/high-grade B-cell lymphoma and how they impact MYC expression and clinical outcome; how best to investigate this in a routine clinical setting; and (4) how best to define high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with 11q aberrations to distinguish them from their mimics and characterise their molecular pathogenetic mechanism. Addressing these questions would provide more robust evidence to better define these entities/subtypes, improve their diagnosis and/or prognostic stratification, leading to better patient care. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The Clinicopathologic Features and Molecular Signatures of Blastoid High-Grade B Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified

A small subset of high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with blastoid morphology remains poorly understood. We assessed 55 cases of blastoid HGBL, not otherwise specified (NOS) and compared their clinicopathologic characteristics with those of 81 non-blastoid HGBL-NOS and 62 blastoid HGBL with MYC and BCL2, with or without BCL6 rearrangements (double/triple-hit lymphoma [D/THL]). Patients with blastoid HGBL-NOS showed similar clinicopathologic features to patients with blastoid D/THLs and non-blastoid HGBL-NOS, except more frequently with a history of low-grade B-cell lymphoma, bone marrow involvement, and BCL2 rearrangement (P < .05) compared to the latter. MYC rearrangement (MYC-R), detected in 40% of blastoid HGBL-NOS, was associated with aggressive clinicopathologic features and poorer overall survival, even worse than that of blastoid D/THL (P < .05). Transcriptome profiling revealed a distinct gene expression pattern with differentially expressed genes enriched in MYC and P53-targeted genes in MYC-R blastoid HGBL-NOS. Fifty-two percent of blastoid HGBL-NOS had a double hit-like signature, similar to non-blastoid HGBL-NOS (P = .73). The overall survival of the blastoid HGBL-NOS group was similar to that of the blastoid D/THL group but appeared poorer than that of its non-blastoid counterparts (P = .07). Taken together, blastoid HGBL-NOS is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that shares overlapping clinicopathologic and genetic features with non-blastoid HGBL-NOS. MYC-R in patients with blastoid HGBL-NOS identifies a highly aggressive subgroup with distinct aggressive clinicopathologic features, unique molecular signatures, and a dismal clinical outcome.

Large B-Cell Lymphomas in the 5th Edition of the WHO-Classification of Haematolymphoid Neoplasms-Updated Classification and New Concepts

The family/class of the large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of haematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM5) features only a few major changes as compared to the 4th edition. In most entities, there are only subtle changes, many of them only representing some minor modifications in diagnostic terms. Major changes have been made in the diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL)/high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBL) associated with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. This category now consists of MYC and BCL2 rearranged cases exclusively, while the MYC/BCL6 double hit lymphomas now constitute genetic subtypes of DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) or of HGBL, NOS. Other major changes are the conceptual merger of lymphomas arising in immune-privileged sites and the description of LBCL arising in the setting of immune dysregulation/deficiency. In addition, novel findings concerning underlying biological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of the different entities are provided.

Lack of reproducibility of histopathological features in MYC-rearranged large B cell lymphoma using digital whole slide images: a study from the Lunenburg lymphoma biomarker consortium

AIMS

Subclassification of large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is challenging due to the overlap in histopathological, immunophenotypical and genetic data. In particular, the criteria to separate diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL) are difficult to apply in practice. The Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium previously reported a cohort of over 5000 LBCL that included fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) data. This cohort contained 209 cases with MYC rearrangement that were available for a validation study by a panel of eight expert haematopathologists of how various histopathological features are used.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Digital whole slide images of haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections allowed the pathologists to visually score cases independently as well as participate in virtual joint review conferences. Standardised consensus guidelines were formulated for scoring histopathological features and included overall architecture/growth pattern, presence or absence of a starry-sky pattern, cell size, nuclear pleomorphism, nucleolar prominence and a range of cytological characteristics. Despite the use of consensus guidelines, the results show a high degree of discordance among the eight expert pathologists. Approximately 50% of the cases lacked a majority score, and this discordance spanned all six histopathological features. Moreover, none of the histological variables aided in prediction of MYC single versus double/triple-hit or immunoglobulin-partner FISH-based designations or clinical outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that there are no specific conventional morphological parameters that help to subclassify MYC-rearranged LBCL or select cases for FISH analysis, and that incorporation of FISH data is essential for accurate classification and prognostication.

Blastoid B-Cell Neoplasms: Diagnostic Challenges and Solutions

Blastoid B-cell neoplasms mainly include B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL), blastoid mantle cell lymphoma, and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with blastoid morphologic features (blastoid HGBL). Distinguishing blastoid HGBL from B-ALL can be challenging and we previously developed six-point flow cytometry-focused and three-point immunohistochemistry-focused scoring systems to aid in differential diagnosis. However, the six-point scoring system was derived from bone marrow cases and occasional cases may have a misleading score using either system. In this study, we assessed 121 cases of blastoid-HGBL (37 BM and 84 extramedullary) to validate the six-point scoring system in all tissue types and to further compare the two scoring systems. Compared with 47 B-ALL cases enriched for CD34-negative neoplasm, the 121 blastoid-HGBL cases showed distinctive pathologic features. The six-point scoring system showed a sensitivity of 100%. A comparison of the two scoring systems in blastoid HGBL (n = 64) and B-ALL (n = 37) showed a concordance score rate of 88%. Thirteen cases showed misleading scores, including five HGBL and eight B-ALL, and the diagnosis was further validated by gene transcriptome profiling. Twelve of thirteen cases had discordant scores between the two scoring systems. Simultaneous employment of both scoring systems improved the accuracy of classification of blastoid B-cell neoplasms to 99%. In conclusion, the previously defined six-point scoring system showed an excellent performance regardless of the tissue origin. Using both scoring systems together improves the accuracy of classification of blastoid B-cell neoplasms. Cases with discordant scores between the two scoring systems were extremely challenging neoplasms and classification required correlation with all available clinical and genetic features.

Diagnostic approaches and future directions in Burkitt lymphoma and high-grade B-cell lymphoma

Since the 2016 WHO update, progress has been made in understanding the biology of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and the concept of high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCL) that allows some degree of refinement. The summary presented here reviews in detail the discussions of the Clinical Advisory Committee and expands upon the newly published 2022 International Consensus Classification for lymphoid malignancies (Campo et al. Blood, 2022). BL remains the prototypic HGBCL and diagnostic criteria are largely unchanged. HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and HGBCL with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements are now separated to reflect biologic and pathologic differences. HGBCL, NOS remains a diagnosis of exclusion that should be used only in rare cases. FISH strategies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and HGBCL are discussed in detail for these diseases. Advances in integrative analysis of mutations, structural abnormalities, copy number, and gene expression signatures allow a more nuanced view of the heterogeneity of DLBCL, NOS as well as definitions of HGBCL and point to where the future may be headed for classification of these diseases.

CAR T-cell Therapy in Highly-Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: Emerging Biological and Clinical Insights

Recently, significant progress has been made in identifying novel therapies, beyond conventional immunochemotherapy strategies, with efficacy in B-cell lymphomas. One such approach involves targeting the CD19 antigen on B-cells with autologous-derived chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cells. This strategy is highly effective in patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as evidenced by recent regulatory approvals. Recent reports suggest that this is an effective strategy for high-grade B-cell. The biological underpinnings of these entities and how they overlap with each other and DLBCL continue to be areas of intense investigation. Therefore, as more experience with CAR T-cell approaches is examined, it is interesting to consider how both tumor-cell specific and microenvironment factors that define these highly aggressive subsets influence susceptibility to this approach.

A Combined Biomarker of Bright CD38 and MYC ≥55% Is Highly Predictive of Double-/Triple-Hit High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangements (double-/triple-hit lymphoma [DTHL]) appears to mandate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for all large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Given the low incidence of DTHL, we aimed to identify flow cytometry (FC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of DTHL that could be used to develop an optimal screening strategy. This combined FC-IHC approach has not yet been studied.

METHODS

We compared features of 40 cases of DTHL and 39 cases of diffuse LBCL (DLBCL) without MYC rearrangement.

RESULTS

Bright CD38 expression (CD38bright) by FC, high MYC expression (≥55%), and double-expressor phenotype by IHC were significantly associated with DTHL. The biomarker combining FC and IHC, CD38bright and/or MYC ≥55%, was superior to FC and IHC markers alone in predicting DTHL. Restricting FISH testing to approximately 25% of LBCL based on CD38brightand/or MYC ≥55% would detect approximately 95% of DTHL-BCL2 and approximately 75% of DHL-BCL6.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the novel biomarker of CD38bright and/or MYC ≥55% is highly predictive of DTHL. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of this screening strategy would facilitate development of a rational diagnostic workflow to provide high-quality patient care.

Blastoid high-grade B-cell lymphoma initially presenting in bone marrow: a diagnostic challenge

The 2016 WHO classification introduced the category of high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), which includes one poorly understood subset, blastoid-HGBL. Establishing the diagnosis and distinguishing blastoid-HGBL from B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in bone marrow can be challenging. We assessed 31 cases of blastoid-HGBL diagnosed initially in bone marrow and compared this group to 36 cases of B-ALL using immunophenotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted next generation sequencing analysis. The 31 blastoid-HGBL cases included 14 HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double hit lymphoma, DHL), 13 HGBL, not otherwise specified (NOS), and four cases with TdT expression that were difficult to classify. Compared with B-ALL, blastoid-HGBL cases more often showed increased intensity/bright expression of CD20, CD38, CD45, BCL-6, and MYC, and less frequent bright expression of CD10 and TdT. Cases of blastoid-HGBL also more frequently had MYC rearrangement, a complex karyotype and TP53 mutation (p < 0.01). With the exception of CD34, no other single factor, including TdT, was sensitive or adequately specific to distinguish blastoid-HGBL from B-ALL. We developed a scoring system using six distinctive features between 16 cases of unequivocal blastoid HGBL and 22 cases of CD34-positive B-ALL, with a score of ≥3 defining blastoid-HGBL. The system was further validated by using 15 cases of surface light chain negative, and/or CD45 dim to negative blastoid-HGBL and 14 cases of CD34-negative B-ALL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of this scoring system were 100%, 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. Using this system, the four cases with TdT expression were all classified as blastoid-HGBL: three were DHL and one was HGBL-NOS. In conclusion, blastoid-HGBL shows distinctive immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular features as compared with B-ALL. The proposed scoring system can be helpful for the classification of diagnostically challenging blastoid lymphoid tumors presenting initially in the bone marrow.

AID is a poor prognostic marker of high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with MYC rearrangement is defined as double/triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL) or single-hit lymphoma (SHL) by the inclusion of the BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements status. DHL/THL is called as "high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements" in the World Health Organization 2017 Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. To find a prognostic biomarker of DHL/THL, we firstly examined 19 cases (molecular analysis series;10 cases of DHL/THL and 9 cases of SHL) with gene expression profile analysis. The gene expression profile analysis showed that the high expression of AICDA was associated with an adverse prognosis in DHL/THL, but not in SHL. Then, we evaluated immunohistochemical expression of AID, the protein product of AICDA, in 50 cases (molecular analysis series of 19 cases and additional immunohistochemistry series of 31 cases; 12 cases of DHL/THL and 19 cases of SHL) and confirmed that its expression was also associated with an adverse prognosis in DHL/THL. Therefore, AICDA and AID can be a predictor of an adverse clinical outcome in DHL/THL and immunohistochemistry of AID is useful to find DHL/THL-adverse prognosis group.

Defining and Treating High-grade B-cell lymphoma, NOS

High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBL, NOS) is a recently introduced diagnostic category for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. It includes tumors with Burkitt-like or blastoid morphology that do not have double-hit cytogenetics and that cannot be classified as other well-defined lymphoma subtypes. HBCL, NOS are rare and heterogeneous; most have germinal center B-cell phenotype, and up to 45% carry a single-hit MYC rearrangement, but otherwise they have no unifying immunophenotypic or cytogenetic characteristics. Recent analyses utilizing gene expression profiling (GEP) revealed that up to 15% of tumors currently classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma display a HGBL-like GEP signature, indicating a potential to significantly expand the HGBL category using more objective molecular criteria. Optimal treatment of HGBL, NOS is poorly defined due to its rarity and inconsistent diagnostic patterns. A minority of patients have early-stage disease which can be managed with standard RCHOP-based approaches with or without radiation. For advanced-stage HGBL, NOS, which often presents with aggressive, disseminated disease, high lactate dehydrogenase, and involvement of extranodal organs (including the central nervous system [CNS]), intensified Burkitt lymphoma-like regimens with CNS prophylaxis may be appropriate. However, many patients diagnosed at age > 60 years are not eligible for intensive immunochemotherapy. An improved, GEP and/or genomic-based pathologic classification that could facilitate HGBL-specific trials is needed to improve outcomes for all patients. In this review, we discuss the current clinicopathologic concept of HGBL, NOS, existing data on its prognosis and treatment, and delineate potential future taxonomy enrichments based on emerging molecular diagnostics.

Molecular Update and Evolving Classification of Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

The development of high-throughput technologies in recent years has increased our understanding of the molecular complexity of lymphomas, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of large B-cell neoplasms and identifying different molecular biomarkers with prognostic impact, that lead to the revision of the World Health Organization consensus classification of lymphomas. This review addresses the main histopathological and molecular features of large B-cells lymphomas, providing an overview of the main recent novelties introduced by the last update of the consensus classification.

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are aggressive B-cell neoplasms with considerable clinical, biologic, and pathologic diversity. The application of high throughput technologies to the study of lymphomas has yielded abundant molecular data leading to the identification of distinct molecular identities and novel pathogenetic pathways. In light of this new information, newly refined diagnostic criteria have been established in the fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) consensus classification of lymphomas, which was revised in 2016. This article reviews the histopathological and molecular features of the various aggressive B-cell lymphoma subtypes included in the updated classification.

MYC single-hit large B-cell lymphoma: clinicopathologic difference from MYC-negative large B-cell lymphoma and MYC double-hit/triple-hit lymphoma

MYC-rearranged large B-cell lymphoma with BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangement, double-hit (DH) or triple-hit (TH) lymphoma, is associated with poor survival after standard treatment. To investigate the clinical impact of single-hit (SH) MYC rearrangement, we analyzed 241 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Fifty-five of 241 (22.8%) cases showed MYC rearrangements. Twenty-three cases were diagnosed as DLBCL; 18 as high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL)-DH; 3 as HGBCL-TH; and 11 as HGBCL, not otherwise specified. Both DH and TH lymphomas showed high-grade morphology (P = 0.002), higher stage (P = 0.022), and more frequent germinal center B-cell-like phenotype (P = 0.008). SH lymphomas displayed high-grade morphology (P = 0.002) but were not different from MYC-negative lymphomas in cell of origin, clinical stage, international prognostic index (IPI), or extranodal involvement. Patients with DH/TH lymphomas had worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.016) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001), while OS and PFS of SH lymphomas were not different from those of MYC-negative lymphomas. There was no survival difference between cases of BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements. Poorer prognostic factors included higher ECOG class, higher IPI, and DH or TH translocation for OS, and higher IPI and DH or TH translocation for PFS. Higher IPI was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. In conclusion, large B-cell lymphomas with single MYC rearrangement showed high-grade morphology but were otherwise not different from MYC-negative lymphomas.

New developments in non-Hodgkin lymphoid malignancies

The revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues (2017) reflects significant advances in understanding the biology, genetic basis and behaviour of haematopoietic neoplasms. This review focuses on some of the major changes in B-cell and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the 2017 WHO and includes more recent updates. The 2017 WHO saw a shift towards conservatism in the classification of precursor lesions of small B-cell lymphomas such as monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, in situ follicular and in situ mantle cell neoplasms. With more widespread use of next generation sequencing (NGS), special entities within follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma were recognised with recurrent genetic aberrations and unique clinicopathological features. The diagnostic workup of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and hairy cell leukaemia has been refined with the discovery of MYD88 L265P and BRAF V600E mutations, respectively, in these entities. Recommendations in the immunohistochemical evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma include determining cell of origin and expression of MYC and BCL2, so called 'double-expressor' phenotype. EBV-positive large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly has been renamed to recognise its occurrence amongst a wider age group. EBV-positive mucocutaneous ulcer is a newly recognised entity with indolent clinical behaviour that occurs in the setting of immunosuppression. Two lymphomas with recurrent genetic aberrations are newly included provisional entities: Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration and large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas with MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, so called 'double-hit/triple-hit' lymphomas are now a distinct entity. Much progress has been made in understanding intestinal T-cell lymphomas. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, type II, is now known to not be associated with coeliac disease and is hence renamed monomorphic epitheliotropic T-cell lymphoma. An indolent clonal T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the GI tract is a newly included provisional entity. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and nodal T-cell lymphomas with T-follicular helper phenotype are included in a single broad category, emphasising their shared genetic and phenotypic features. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK- is upgraded to a definitive entity with subsets carrying recurrent rearrangements in DUSP22 or TP63. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a new provisional entity with indolent behaviour. Finally, cutaneous T-cell proliferations include a new provisional entity, primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma, and reclassification of primary small/medium CD4-positive T-cell lymphoma as lymphoproliferative disorder.

Clinicopathological and genetic characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the oropharyngeal and maxillofacial region

OBJECTIVES

The study was aimed to analyze the clinicopathological and molecular pathological features of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the oropharyngeal and maxillofacial region.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed with 36 patients who were diagnosed with primary DLBCL of the oropharyngeal and maxillofacial region from 2009 to 2017 in the Department of Pathology at the Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed.

RESULTS

Gene rearrangements of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC were observed in 5.6%, 33.3%, and 22.2%, respectively, including two double-hit and one triple-hit DLBCL (8.3%). There was a significant correlation between MYC protein expression and gene translocation (rs = 0.679, p < .001). However, 25% of cases with MYC rearrangement showed low MYC protein expression. In univariate analysis, MYC protein expression, BCL2 rearrangement, MYC rearrangement, and double/triple-hit DLBCL were associated with shorter overall survival, whereas only MYC protein expression was an independent prognostic value in multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

MYC protein expression was an essential prognostic marker of DLBCL in the oropharyngeal and maxillofacial region. Notably, immunohistochemical staining of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 could not predict their gene rearrangements, although MYC protein expression was correlated with gene translocation.

Scientific Advances and the Evolution of Diagnosis, Subclassification and Treatment of Lymphoma

The diagnosis of lymphoma has evolved tremendously over time. Initially, diagnosis of lymphoma was largely based on morphology alone. Over time, immunophenotyping using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, and then in situ hybridization, have contributed dramatically to the pathologist's ability to recognize, diagnose and subclassify lymphomas more precisely. In recent years, cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques have developed that allow evaluation of abnormalities in lymphomas, leading to an understanding of their pathogenesis and opening the door to targeted therapies that will lead to better outcomes for lymphoma patients.

[Prognostic evaluation of P53 and BCL2 proteins in MYC/BCL2 double expression DLBCL]

Objective: To investigate the strong expression (S+) of P53 and BCL2 proteins in MYC/BCL2 double-expression DLBCL (DEL) and whether they can be used for the prognostic evaluation and stratified diagnosis of DELs. Methods: Tissue microarray were made by filed FFPE blocks of 174 DLBCL cases. The translocation of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 genes were detected by FISH, and the proteins were detected by IHC. Data of clinicopathologic features and follow up of patients were collected and OS (overall survival) and PFS (progression free survival) were analyzed by statistics. Results: Eight double-hit lymphomas (DHLs) were identified in all cases, and 45 DELs were selected from 166 remaining cases, which have no significant difference in OS and PFS compared with non-DEL cases (P=0.668 and P=0.790) . Of 42 DEL-cases with follow up data, 24 cases with P53+ or/and BCL2 (S+) are significantly shorter OS and PFS than others (P=0.003 and P=0.000) , in which the cases with P53+/BCL2 (S+) co-expression were the worst prognosis, and P53/BCL2 co-weaker positive DEL cases even have superior OS and PFS than those non-DELs. Although statistics showed that the cases of P53+ or/and BCL2 (S+) have a lower OS and PFS in total cases (P=0.063 and P=0.024) , it is not the case when the DEL-cases take out from total cases, that is the cases with P53+ or/and BCL2 (S+) are as similar OS and PFS as others in non-DEL group (P=0.590 and P=0.550) . Conclusion: The strong expression of P53 and BCL2 proteins can be used as indicators of stratified diagnosis and poor prognosis of DEL.

Identification of "Double Hit" Lymphomas Using Updated WHO Criteria: Insights From Routine MYC Immunohistochemistry in 272 Consecutive Cases of Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas

Aggressive lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations ("double hit" lymphomas, DHL) represent a distinct diagnostic category in the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The diagnostic yield of MYC immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the identification of DHL is currently uncertain. MYC IHC was performed in 272 consecutive cases of aggressive B-cell lymphoma, and results correlated with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC translocations. Among 156 patients with IHC and FISH data, MYC IHC identified MYC translocations with 89% sensitivity, 38% specificity, 92% negative predictive value, and 29% positive predictive value. Three of 15 (20%) of DHL were MYC IHC negative. One case contained a MYC translocation detectable IGH/MYC fusion probes but not MYC break-apart probes. A subset of DHL lack MYC protein expression, and recognition of this subset of cases requires FISH testing. These results provide an appropriate diagnostic algorithm for implementation of 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria.

Clinical Interest of LMO2 Testing for the Diagnosis of Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphomas

MYC rearrangements usually confer aggressive biological behavior to large B-cell lymphomas. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of LMO2 detection to the clinical approach to these tumors. First, the ability of LMO2 loss of expression to recognize the presence of MYC rearrangements was evaluated. A series of 365 samples obtained from 351 patients, including 28 Burkitt lymphoma, 230 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 30 high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements, eight high-grade B-cell lymphoma-NOS, 43 transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and 26 high-grade follicular lymphomas was analyzed. Among the CD10-positive tumors prospectively analyzed in whole tissue sections, LMO2 negative expression obtained values of 88% sensitivity, 94% specificity, and 93% accuracy, proving the utility of LMO2 to screen MYC rearrangements. In addition, survival analyses were performed in a series of 155 patients. As per univariate analyses, the prognosis relevance of LMO2 was as useful as that of the diagnostic categories, MYC rearrangements, and MYC immunohistochemistry. Multivariate models revealed that both LMO2 (hazard ratio 0.51 p = 0.02) and IPI (hazard ratio 1.67 p < 0.005) were independent variables predicting overall survival. Finally, MYC and LMO2 mRNA expression were analyzed in a small group of cases. Taken together, these findings show the interest of LMO2 testing in large B-cell lymphomas.

Advances in pathological understanding of high-grade B cell lymphomas

INTRODUCTION

The designation high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) has been incorporated into the 2016 Revision of the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and includes two types: (1) HGBL, not otherwise specified; and (2) HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, also known as double or triple hit lymphoma (DHL/THL). These categories of lymphomas represent 1-2% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and a considerable portion of DLBCL patients who are primary refractory to R-CHOP therapy. It corresponds to the designation 'B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma' in the 2008 WHO classification. Areas covered: This paper provides an update of HGBL, focusing on their pathologic features, prognosis, and diagnostic workup. It highlights advances in our understanding of DHL/THL. Expert commentary: The diagnosis relies on FISH testing and the major controversial question is when to perform it to diagnose virtually all DHL/THL cases, but also being cost effective. Currently there is no consensus. Considering the high refractory rate of these patients to standard R-CHOP induction, the authors recommend FISH testing in all newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma by using our stepwise test strategy. With the progress of molecular genetics, the prognosis will be further stratified and HGBL-NOS maybe further evolve too.

Prognostic Significance of BCL-2 and BCL-6 Expression in MYC-positive DLBCL

BACKGROUND

Double-expression lymphoma (DEL) is a rare subgroup of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which has coexpression of MYC and BCL-2. Coexpression of MYC and BCL-2 is considered a prognostic marker portending poor outcomes. However, the prognostic effect of BCL-2 and BCL-6 expression in DLBCL remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining was performed to detect MYC, BCL-2 and BCL-6 expression in 212 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and assess the prognostic effects of BCL-2 and BCL-6 expression. The DLBCL patients were treated with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine [Oncovin], prednisone)-like regimens.

RESULTS

Retrospective analysis revealed that BCL-2⁺ and BCL-2⁺/MYC⁺ were prognostic factors indicative of poor outcomes. Patients with BCL-2⁺ and/or MYC⁺ expression had a poorer prognosis than that of patients with BCL-2^- and/or MYC^- expression. Patients with BCL-2⁺/MYC^- expression showed a trend toward poorer survival than those with BCL-2^-/MYC⁺ expression, suggesting that BCL-2 plays a more important role than MYC. Also, patients with BCL-6^-/MYC⁺ expression had poorer progression-free survival than those with BCL-6⁺/MYC⁺ expression. In addition, patients with BCL-2⁺/MYC⁺/BCL-6^- expression had the worst prognosis, suggesting that BCL-6^- is a prognostic factor for poor outcomes for MYC⁺ DLBCL patients. Altogether, our findings have shown that BCL-2 is an independent prognostic factor and possibly plays a more important role than MYC in MYC⁺ DLBCL patients. Furthermore, we found that BCL-6^- expression could also be a prognostic factor portending poor outcomes for MYC⁺ DLBCL patients.

Inferior survival in high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements is not associated with MYC/IG gene rearrangements

High-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double-/triple-hit lymphoma) have an aggressive clinical course. We investigated the prognostic value of transformation from low-grade lymphoma, cytological features (high grade versus large cell), MYC rearrangement partners (immunoglobulin versus nonimmunoglobulin gene), and treatment. We evaluated 100 adults with double-/triple-hit lymphoma, reviewing cytological features; cell of origin; and rearrangements of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 using MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 break-apart and IGH/MYC, IGL/MYC, IGK/MYC, and IGH/BCL2 dual-fusion interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization probes. Outcome analysis was restricted to patients with lymphoma, de novo or at transformation, who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Among them, 60% had high-grade cytological features; 91% had a germinal center B-cell phenotype, and 60% had a MYC/IG rearrangement. Germinal center B-cell phenotype was associated with BCL2 rearrangements (P<0.001). Mean (95% confidence interval) 5-year overall survival was 49% (37%–64%). Transformation from previously treated and untreated low-grade lymphoma was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.99; P=0.008). Patients with high-grade cytological features showed a non-significant tendency to inferior outcome (hazard ratio, 2.32; P=0.09). No association was observed between MYC rearrangement partner and overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.00; P=0.99). Compared with patients receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (R-CHOP) and dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (EPOCH-R), patients receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine (R-CODOX-M/IVAC) had a non-significant tendency to better overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.37; P=0.10). In conclusion, high-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements had heterogeneous outcomes and MYC/IG rearrangements were not associated with inferior overall survival.

Rapid, real time pathology review for ECOG/ACRIN 1412: a novel and successful paradigm for future lymphoma clinical trials in the precision medicine era

ECOG/ACRIN 1412 (E1412) is a randomized, phase II open-label study of lenalidomide/RCHOP vs. RCHOP alone in adults with newly diagnosed de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and requires NanoString gene expression profiling (GEP) for cell-of-origin testing. Because of high ineligibility rate on retrospective expert central pathology review (ECPR), real-time (RT) ECPR was instituted to confirm diagnosis and ensure adequate tissue for GEP prior to study enrollment. Goal was notification of eligibility within 2 working days (WD). Initially, 208 patients were enrolled, 74 (35.6%) of whom were deemed ineligible by retrospective ECPR. After initiation of RT-ECPR, 219 patients were registered. Of these, 73 (33.3%) were ineligible and were declined enrollment; 47 (21.5% of total) had an ineligible diagnosis on RT-ECPR, and 26 (11.9% of total) had inadequate tissue. Because the 73 ineligible patients were never enrolled, no study slots were “lost” during this phase. Notification of eligibility occurred in an average of 1 WD (Range 0–4) with 97.3% within 2 WD. This novel RT-ECPR serves as a model for future lymphoma trials. Real-time ECPR can help to reduce costs and ensure that study slots accurately reflect the targeted population. In the precision-medicine era, rapid collection of relevant pathology/biomarker data is essential to trial success.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide, representing approximately 30-40% of all cases in different geographic regions. Patients most often present with a rapidly growing tumour mass in single or multiple, nodal or extranodal sites. The most common type of DLBCL, designated as not otherwise specified, represents 80-85% of all cases and is the focus of this review. There are also rare types of lymphoma composed of large B-cells, in aggregate about 15-20% of all neoplasms that are sufficiently distinctive to recognise separately. DLBCL not otherwise specified (referred to henceforth as DLBCL) is a heterogeneous entity in terms of clinical presentation, genetic findings, response to therapy, and prognosis. A major advance was the application of gene expression profiling (GEP) to the study of DLBCL which further clarified this heterogeneity and provided a rationale for subdividing cases into groups. The most popular system divides cases of DLBCL according to cell-of-origin into germinal centre B-cell like (GCB) and activated B-cell like (ABC) subtypes, with about 10-15% of cases being unclassifiable. Patients with the GCB subtype usually have better prognosis than patients with the ABC subtype. Although cell-of-origin is useful for predicting outcome, the GCB and ABC subtypes remain heterogeneous, with better and worse prognostic subsets within each group. Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of DLBCL has facilitated global identification of numerous and diverse genetic abnormalities in these neoplasms and has shown that GCB and ABC tumours have different mutation profiles. Although the therapy of patients with DLBCL is an active area of research, the current 5-year overall survival rate is 60-70% using standard-of-care frontline therapy. A precision medicine approach for the design of new therapies based on molecular findings in DLBCL is likely the best path forward. As pathologists, our role has expanded beyond diagnosis. We must perform a complete work-up of DLBCL cases. In addition to our traditional role in establishing the diagnosis, we need to analyse markers that provide information regarding prognosis and potential therapeutic targets. We also must ensure that adequate tissue is triaged for molecular studies which are essential for designing therapy regimens, particularly in the setting of disease relapse.