The Use of Ancillary Stains in the Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus and Barrett Esophagus–associated Dysplasia: Recommendations From the Rodger C. Haggitt Gastrointestinal Pathology Society

Should Special Staining (AB/PAS) be Routinely Performed in Gastric Biopsies for the Detection of Intestinal Metaplasia?

Background. Gastric intestinal metaplasia increases the risk of gastric cancer by nine times. Although attempts are made to diagnose it using endoscopic methods, the final diagnosis is established by examining and reporting biopsy samples. Although there are studies in the literature that do not recommend routine special staining, many laboratories routinely perform alcian blue/periodic acid Schiffs (AB/PAS) staining, in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. In this study, we examined the need for performing routine special staining. Methods. Seven hundred forty-one consecutive gastric biopsies obtained from the archive of our laboratory in 2019 were included in the study. One day after evaluating the cases using H&E, they were evaluated with AB/PAS without examining the H&E results. Result. All of the intestinal metaplasia lesions detected in H&E were observed with AB/PAS. However, we missed 14 (13.73%) of 102 intestinal metaplasia lesions with H&E that we detected using AB/PAS. We found the sensitivity and specificity of H&E in detecting intestinal metaplasia were 86.3% and 99.7%, respectively. When we retrospectively examined the 14 missed lesions in H&E staining, we could observe intestinal metaplasia in six biopsies, but it was not possible in eight (7.8%). Conclusion. Considering that gastric intestinal metaplasia is a precancerous lesion, we think that this ratio (13.73%) is high and that the number of malignancies can be reduced with a low-cost special stain. In this context, we advocate and recommend routinely performing inexpensive special staining such as AB/PAS to detect intestinal metaplasia in all gastric biopsies.

p53 as Exemplar Next-Generation Immunohistochemical Marker: A Molecularly Informed, Pattern-Based Approach, Methodological Considerations, and Pan-Cancer Diagnostic Applications

This review is based on a webinar I presented for the International Society for Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology (ISIMM) in February 2022. It is intended that all ISIMM webinars will ultimately be published in AIMM as review articles. This work is also dedicated to Clive Taylor, who has deeply impacted my career. It presents a molecularly informed, pattern-based approach to p53 immunohistochemistry interpretation, methodological considerations (ie, antibody selection, optimization, validation, controls, and external quality assessment), and pan-cancer diagnostic applications, including those drawn from gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, neuroendocrine, hematologic, and neuropathology. It intends to prove the thesis statement that p53 is an exemplar next-generation immunohistochemical marker "born" ahead of its time.

Cancer Risk in Barrett's Esophagus: A Clinical Review

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rapidly increasing in incidence and is associated with a poor prognosis. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review aims to explore Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the progression from the former to the latter. An overview of the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, and risk factors for both entities are presented, with special attention being given to the areas of debate in the literature. The progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma is reviewed and the relevant molecular pathways are discussed. The definition of Barrett's esophagus remains debated and without international consensus. This, alongside other factors, has made establishing the true prevalence of Barrett's esophagus challenging. The degree of dysplasia can be a histological challenge, but is necessary to guide clinical management. The progression of BE to EAC is likely driven by inflammatory pathways, pepsin exposure, upregulation of growth factor pathways, and mitochondrial changes. Surveillance is maintained through serial endoscopic evaluation, with shorter intervals recommended for high-risk features.

Aberrant p53 expression is associated with neoplastic progression in Barrett oesophagus diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of p53 and other potential clinical parameters as prognostic markers for predicting neoplastic progression in Barrett oesophagus (BE) patients diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia (IND). The study included patients with established BE of any extent who had a diagnosis of IND accompanied by concurrent p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) stain at the index endoscopic procedure and at least one follow-up examination between 2000 and 2021. Correlation between disease progression from IND to higher-grade dysplasia [low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)] and clinicopathological parameters were analysed. A total of 149 patients (99 males; mean age 63.3 ± 10.0 years, range = 35-89) were included in the final analysis. Median follow-up was 37.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) = 20.5-59.1 months]. Progression rates from IND to LGD and HGD were 12.1% (18 of 149) and 2.7% (four of 149), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the number of IND diagnoses was significantly associated with progression to both LGD and HGD (P = 0.016 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that aberrant p53 expression was significantly associated with progression to LGD [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.91-12.45, P = 0.001] and HGD (HR = 21.81, 95% CI = 1.88-253.70, P = 0.014). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also demonstrated that aberrant p53 expression was significantly associated with progression to LGD (P < 0.001) and HGD (P = 0.001). Our results suggest that frequency of IND diagnoses and status of p53 expression can help to stratify risk of neoplastic progression in BE patients with IND.

Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common condition associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. BE is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a highly lethal cancer with an increasing incidence over the last 5 decades. These revised guidelines implement Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to propose recommendations for the definition and diagnosis of BE, screening for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, surveillance of patients with known BE, and the medical and endoscopic treatment of BE and its associated early neoplasia. Important changes since the previous iteration of this guideline include a broadening of acceptable screening modalities for BE to include nonendoscopic methods, liberalized intervals for surveillance of short-segment BE, and volume criteria for endoscopic therapy centers for BE. We recommend endoscopic eradication therapy for patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia and those with BE and low-grade dysplasia. We propose structured surveillance intervals for patients with dysplastic BE after successful ablation based on the baseline degree of dysplasia. We could not make recommendations regarding chemoprevention or use of biomarkers in routine practice due to insufficient data.

Abnormal TP53 Predicts Risk of Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Regardless of a Diagnosis of Dysplasia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. A major challenge is identifying the small group with BE who will progress to advanced disease from the many who will not. Assessment of p53 status has promise as a predictive biomarker, but analytic limitations and lack of validation have precluded its use. The aim of this study was to develop a robust criteria for grading abnormal immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of p53 and to test its utility as a biomarker for progression in BE.

METHODS

Criteria for abnormal IHC of p53 were developed in BE biopsies and validated with sequencing to assess TP53 mutations. The utility of p53 IHC as a biomarker for progression of BE was tested retrospectively in 561 patients with BE with or without known progression. The findings were prospectively validated in a clinical practice setting in 1487 patients with BE.

RESULTS

Abnormal p53 IHC highly correlated with TP53 mutation status (90.6% agreement) and was strongly associated with neoplastic progression in the retrospective cohorts, regardless of histologic diagnosis (P < .001). In the retrospective cohort, abnormal p53 was associated with a hazard ratio of 5.03 (95% confidence interval, 3.88-6.5) and a hazard ratio of 5.27 (95% confidence interval, 3.93-7.07) for patients with exclusively nondysplastic disease before progression. In the prospective validation cohort, p53 IHC predicted progression among nondysplastic BE, indefinite for dysplasia, and low-grade dysplasia (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

p53 IHC identifies patients with BE at higher risk of progression, including in patients without evidence of dysplasia. p53 IHC is inexpensive, easily integrated into routine practice, and should be considered in biopsies from all BE patients without high-grade dysplasia or cancer.

Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a major risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). BE patients undergo periodic endoscopic surveillance with biopsies to detect dysplasia and EAC, but this strategy is imperfect owing to sampling error and inconsistencies in the diagnosis and grading of dysplasia, which may result in an inaccurate diagnosis or risk assessment for progression to EAC. The desire for more accurate diagnosis and better risk stratification has prompted the investigation and development of potential biomarkers that might assist pathologists and clinicians in the management of BE patients, allowing more aggressive endoscopic surveillance and treatment options to be targeted to high-risk individuals, while avoiding frequent surveillance or unnecessary interventions in those at lower risk. It is known that progression of BE to dysplasia and EAC is accompanied by a host of genetic alterations, and that exploration of these markers could be potentially useful to diagnose/grade dysplasia and/or to risk stratify BE patients. Several biomarkers have shown promise in identifying early neoplastic transformation and thus may be useful adjuncts to histologic evaluation. This review provides an overview of some of the currently available biomarkers and assays, including p53 immunostaining, Wide Area Transepithelial Sampling with Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Analysis (WATS^3D), TissueCypher, mutational load analysis (BarreGen), fluorescence in situ hybridization, and DNA content abnormalities as detected by DNA flow cytometry.

Barrett's esophagus: The pathomorphological and molecular genetic keystones of neoplastic progression

Barrett's esophagus is a widespread chronically progressing disease of heterogeneous nature. A life threatening complication of this condition is neoplastic transformation, which is often overlooked due to lack of standardized approaches in diagnosis, preventative measures and treatment. In this essay, we aim to stratify existing data to show specific associations between neoplastic transformation and the underlying processes which predate cancerous transition. We discuss pathomorphological, genetic, epigenetic, molecular and immunohistochemical methods related to neoplasia detection on the basis of Barrett's esophagus. Our review sheds light on pathways of such neoplastic progression in the distal esophagus, providing valuable insight into progression assessment, preventative targets and treatment modalities. Our results suggest that molecular, genetic and epigenetic alterations in the esophagus arise earlier than cancerous transformation, meaning the discussed targets can help form preventative strategies in at-risk patient groups.

The path(ology) from reflux oesophagitis to Barrett oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma

This review seeks to summarise the steps in the path from reflux oesophagitis to Barrett oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The epidemiology, clinical presentation, definitions, pathological features, diagnostic pitfalls, and emerging concepts are reviewed for each entity. The histological features of reflux oesophagitis can be variable and are not specific. Cases of reflux oesophagitis with numerous eosinophils are difficult to distinguish from eosinophilic oesophagitis and other oesophagitides with eosinophils (Crohn's disease, medication effect, and connective tissue disorders). In reflux oesophagitis, the findings are often most pronounced in the distal oesophagus, the eosinophils are randomly distributed throughout the epithelium, and eosinophilic abscesses and degranulated eosinophils are rare. For reflux oesophagitis with prominent lymphocytes, clinical history and ancillary clinical studies are paramount to distinguish reflux oesophagitis from other causes of lymphocytic oesophagitis pattern. For Barrett oesophagus, the definition remains a hotly debated topic for which the requirement for intestinal metaplasia to make the diagnosis is not applied unanimously across the globe. Assessing for dysplasia is a challenging aspect of the histological interpretation that guides clinical management. We describe the histological features that we find useful in making this evaluation. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma has been steadily increasing in incidence and has a poor prognosis. The extent of invasion can be overdiagnosed due to a duplicated muscularis mucosae. We also describe the technical factors that can lead to challenges in distinguishing the mucosal and deep margins of endoscopic resections. Lastly, we give an overview of targeted therapies with emerging importance and the ancillary tests that can identify the cases best suited for each therapy.

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus: an overview with an histologic diagnostic approach

The first part of this overview on non-neoplastic esophagus is focused on gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett’s esophagus. In the last 20 years much has changed in histological approach to biopsies of patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. In particular, elementary histologic lesions have been well defined and modality of evaluation and grade are detailed, their sensitivity and specificity has been evaluated and their use has been validated by several authors. Also if there is not a clinical indication to perform biopsies in patient with GERD, the diagnosis of microscopic esophagitis, when biopsies are provided, can be performed by following simple rules for evaluation which allow pathologists to make the diagnosis with confidence. On the other hand, biopsies are required for the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus. This diagnosis is the synthesis of endoscopic picture (which has to be provided with the proper description on extent and with adequate biopsies number) and histologic pattern. The current guidelines and expert opinions for the correct management of these diagnosis are detailed.

The Meaning of Incidental Goblet Cells at the Gastroesophageal Junction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The causes for the occurrence of goblet cells at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ-GC) are unknown. The aim of our study was to compare the concurrent histologic changes of the stomach in (1) patients with GEJ-GC, but without Barrett's esophagus (BE) to those in (2) patients with BE and in (3) controls without GEJ-GC or BE.

METHODS

We used an electronic database of histopathologic records from 1.3 million individual patients, who underwent esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) in 2009-2018. We compared the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori-positive gastritis (HpG), gastric intestinal metaplasia (G-IM), chronic inactive gastritis (CIG), and reactive gastropathy (RG) among the 3 patient groups, using odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of all EGD patients, 4.0% harbored BE and 2.4% GEJ-GC. The average age of patients with GEJ-GC (60 ± 14) was significantly younger than the age of patients with BE (63 ± 12) and significantly older than the age of controls (55 ± 17). Female subjects were more common among GEJ-GC (54%) than BE (37%), but less common than among controls (63%). The 3 gastric histopathology changes associated with H. pylori were significantly more common in GEJ-GC than BE (for HpG 2.42, 2.29-2.56; for G-IM 1.82, 1.73-1.92; for CIG 1.31, 1.22-1.41). The corresponding differences between GEJ-GC and controls were less striking (for HpG 0.97, 0.93-1.01; for G-IM 1.15, 1.11-1.19; for CIG 0.90, 0.85-0.95). RG was slightly less common in GEJ-GC than BE (0.89, 0.86-0.92) and controls (0.94, 0.91-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to its demographic and histopathologic features, GEJ-GC likely represents gastric intestinal metaplasia as opposed to BE and should prompt gastric intestinal metaplasia screening and management.

Advances in Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Barrett's Esophagus

Dysplasia currently is the primary biomarker used to risk stratify patients with Barrett's esophagus, but dysplasia has a number of considerable limitations in this regard. Thus, investigators over the years have explored innumerable alternative molecular biomarkers for risk stratification in Barrett's esophagus. This report focuses only on those biomarkers that appear most promising based on the availability of multiple published studies corroborating good results, and on the commercial availability of the test. These promising biomarkers include p53 immunostaining, TissueCypher, BarreGEN, and wide-area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted 3-dimensional analysis (WATS^3D).

The modern management of Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia: role of pathology

Modern management of Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia essentially focuses upon surveillance to detect early low-risk neoplastic lesions and offering organ-preserving advanced endoscopic therapies, while traditional surgical treatments of oesophagectomy and lymph node clearance with or without chemoradiation are preserved only for high-risk and advanced carcinomas. With this evolution towards figless invasive therapy, the choice of therapy hinges upon the pathological assessment for risk stratifying patients into those with low risk for nodal metastasis who can continue with less invasive endoscopic therapies and others with high risk for nodal metastasis for which surgery or other forms of treatment are indicated. Detection and confirmation of neoplasia in the first instance depends upon endoscopic and pathological assessment. Endoscopic examination and biopsy sampling should be performed according to the recommended protocols, and endoscopic biopsy interpretation should be performed applying standard criteria using appropriate ancillary studies by histopathologists experienced in the pathology of Barrett's disease. Endoscopic resections (ERs) are both diagnostic and curative and should be performed by clinicians who are skilled with advanced endoscopic techniques. Proper preparation and handling of ERs are essential to assess histological parameters that dictate the curative nature of the procedure. Those parameters are adequacy of resection and risk of lymph node metastasis. The risk of lymph node metastasis is determined by depth invasion and presence of poor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion. Those adenocarcinomas with invasion up to muscularis mucosae (pT1a) and those with superficial submucosal invasion (pT1b) up to 500 µ with no poor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion and negative margins may be considered cured by endoscopic resections.

Use of p53 immunohistochemistry in conjunction with routine histology improves risk stratification of patients with Barrett's oesophagus during routine clinical care

AIMS

Abnormal p53 protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is reported to be a prognostic biomarker for progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). We evaluated our use of p53 IHC for patients with BO under surveillance from 2010 to 2016 in a single academic institution.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 78 patients under surveillance for BO who had biopsies evaluated for abnormal p53 expression in conjunction with routine histology and 892 patients who had histological evaluation alone. All available p53 IHC slides were rescored as wild-type or abnormal. We evaluated the risk of subsequent diagnosis with HGD and OAC. p53-tested patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with indefinite dysplasia (IND) or low-grade dysplasia (LGD), compared to patients who were not tested (79.5 versus 10.8%, P = 7.4 × 10^-40 ). Almost half (46.9%) of patients with abnormal p53 expression were diagnosed with HGD or OAC within 5 years, compared to 5.9% with wild-type p53, and 7.6% of patients not tested (P = 2.6 × 10^-18 ). However, this difference was heavily influenced by other risk factors, including dysplasia grade, in multivariate analyses. In the subgroup of patients diagnosed with IND (n = 109), abnormal p53 expression was associated with a fourfold increase (1.2-13.3, P = 0.023) in risk of HGD/OAC relative to untested patients diagnosed with IND, independent of other risk factors.

CONCLUSION

In patients under surveillance for BO in a single academic institution, we found evidence that selective use of p53 IHC in conjunction with routine histology modestly improved risk stratification by identifying patients with IND at higher risk of a subsequent diagnosis of HGD or OAC.

Inflammatory bowel disease- and Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia: the old, the new, and the persistent struggles

Early diagnosis of and adequate therapy for premalignant lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) has been shown to decrease mortality. Endoscopic examination with histologic evaluation of random and targeted biopsies remains the gold standard for early detection and adequate treatment of neoplasia in both these diseases. Although eventual patient management (including surveillance and treatment) depends upon a precise histologic assessment of the initial biopsy, accurately diagnosing and grading IBD- and BE-associated dysplasia is still considered challenging by many general as well as subspecialized pathologists. Additionally, there are continuing updates in the literature regarding the diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment of these disease entities. This comprehensive review discusses the cancer risk, detailed histopathological features, diagnostic challenges, and updates as well as the latest surveillance and treatment recommendations in IBD- and BE-associated dysplasia.

UGT2B17 and miR-224 contribute to hormone dependency trends in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) are the two main subtypes of esophageal cancer. Genetics underpinnings of EA are substantially less understood than that of ESCC. A large-scale relation data analysis was conducted to explore the genes implicated with either EA or ESCC, or both. Each gene linked to ESCC but not EA was further explored in mega-analysis of six independently collected EA RNA expression datasets. A multiple linear regression (MLR) model was built to study the possible influence of sample size, population region, and study date on the gene expression data in EA. Finally, a functional pathway analysis was conducted to identify the possible linkage between EA and the genes identified as novel significant contributors. We have identified 276 genes associated with EA, 1088 with ESCC, with a significant (P<5.14e-143) overlap between these two gene groups (n=157). Mega-analysis showed that two ESCC-related genes, UGT2B17 and MIR224, were significantly associated with EA (P-value <1e-10), with multiple connecting pathways revealed by functional analysis. ESCC and EA share some common pathophysiological pathways. Further study of UGT2B17 and MIR224, which are differentially dysregulated in ESCC and EA tumors, is warranted. Enhanced expression of UGT2B17 and the lack of miR-224 signaling may contribute to the responsiveness of EA to the male sex steroids.

Histopathology of Barrett’s Esophagus and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Review

Esophageal adenocarcinoma carries a very poor prognosis. For this reason, it is critical to have cost-effective surveillance and prevention strategies and early and accurate diagnosis, as well as evidence-based treatment guidelines. Barrett’s esophagus is the most important precursor lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma, which follows a defined metaplasia–dysplasia–carcinoma sequence. Accurate recognition of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial due to its pivotal prognostic value. For early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, depth of submucosal invasion is a key prognostic factor. Our systematic review of all published data demonstrates a “rule of doubling” for the frequency of lymph node metastases: tumor invasion into each progressively deeper third of submucosal layer corresponds with a twofold increase in the risk of nodal metastases (9.9% in the superficial third of submucosa (sm1) group, 22.0% in the middle third of submucosa (sm2) group, and 40.7% in deep third of submucosa (sm3) group). Other important risk factors include lymphovascular invasion, tumor differentiation, and the recently reported tumor budding. In this review, we provide a concise update on the histopathological features, ancillary studies, molecular signatures, and surveillance/management guidelines along the natural history from Barrett’s esophagus to early stage invasive adenocarcinoma for practicing pathologists.

Histology of Barrett's Metaplasia: Do Goblet Cells Matter?

This review has provided a summary of the biology of goblet cell metaplasia in CLE as it pertains to BE. Goblet cells are terminally differentiated nonproliferative cells that have many overlapping histochemical characteristics with mucinous columnar cells and pseudogoblet cells. There is an abundance of evidence that suggests that use of goblet cells as a biomarker of BE, and its progression to malignancy, is problematic. Some of these limitations include the fact that the background non-goblet epithelium in most patients with CLE is biologically intestinalized and contains molecular abnormalities similar to goblet cell CLE, goblet cells fluctuate with time and decrease in number with progression of neoplasia, and pathologists have problems with interpretation, and distinction, of goblet cells from other types of cells in the esophagus. Sampling error results in sensitivity and specificity issues that limit its positive predictive value. Goblet cells are fewest in number in the same population of patients with CLE that are hardest to detect endoscopically (i.e., those with short or ultrashort CLE). Nevertheless, the risk of cancer in patients with short-segment BE, a condition difficult to distinguish from the stomach, is very low regardless of the presence or absence of goblet cells so it is unclear what the role of goblet cells is in these patients as a biomarker. Nevertheless, if the answer to the following question, "Would you as a gastroenterologist recommend surveillance for a patient with clear endoscopic evidence of CLE, particularly if it is ≥ 3 cm in length, but in which goblet cells were not reported to be present by the pathologist," is yes, then the US requirement for goblet cells as part of the criteria for "BE" is superfluous.

Detection of Mutations in Barrett's Esophagus Before Progression to High-Grade Dysplasia or Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the greatest risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but only a small proportion of patients with BE develop cancer. Biomarkers might be able to identify patients at highest risk of progression. We investigated genomic differences in surveillance biopsies collected from patients whose BE subsequently progressed compared to patients whose disease did not progress.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study of 24 patients with BE that progressed to high-grade dysplasia (HGD, n = 14) or EAC (n = 10). The control group (n = 73, called non-progressors) comprised patients with BE and at least 5 years of total endoscopic biopsy surveillance without progression to HGD or EAC. From each patient, we selected a single tissue sample obtained more than 1 year before progression (cases) or more than 2 years before the end of follow-up (controls). Pathogenic mutations, gene copy numbers, and ploidy were compared between samples from progressors and non-progressors.

RESULTS

TP53 mutations were detected in 46% of samples from progressors and 5% of non-progressors. In this case-control sample set, TP53 mutations in BE tissues increased the adjusted risk of progression 13.8-fold (95% confidence interval, 3.2-61.0) (P < .001). We did not observe significant differences in ploidy or copy-number profile between groups. We identified 147 pathogenic mutations in 57 distinct genes-the average number of pathogenic mutations was higher in samples from progressors (n = 2.5) than non-progressors (n = 1.2) (P < .001). TP53 and other somatic mutations were recurrently detected in samples with limited copy-number changes (aneuploidy).

CONCLUSIONS

In genomic analyses of BE tissues from patients with or without later progression to HGD or EAC, we found significantly higher numbers of TP53 mutations in BE from patients with subsequent progression. These mutations were frequently detected before the onset of dysplasia or substantial changes in copy number.

Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Although researchers have identified genetic alterations that contribute to development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, we know little about features of patients or environmental factors that mediate progression of chronic acid biliary reflux to Barrett's esophagus and cancer. Increasing our understanding of the mechanisms by which normal squamous epithelium progresses to early-stage invasive cancer will help formulate rational surveillance guidelines and allow us to divest resources away from patients at low risk of malignancy. We review the cellular and genetic alterations that occur during progression of Barrett's esophagus, based on findings from clinical studies and mouse models of disease. We review the features of the luminal and mucosal microenvironment of Barrett's esophagus that promote, in a small proportion of patients, development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Markers of clonal evolution can be used to determine patient risk for cancer and set surveillance intervals.