Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinomas With POLE Exonuclease Domain Mutations Have a Favorable Prognosis

Molecular Classification Outperforms Histologic Classification in Prognostication of High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas With Undifferentiated and Sarcomatous Components

Since the establishment of 4 molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma (EC), there has been significant interest in understanding molecular classification in the context of histologic features and diagnoses. ECs with undifferentiated, spindle, and/or sarcomatous components represent a diagnostically challenging subset of tumors with overlapping clinical and histologic features. We examined the clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of these tumors identified in our institutions' pathology databases using immunohistochemistry and targeted sequencing. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. One hundred sixty-two ECs were included: carcinosarcomas (UCS; n=96), dedifferentiated/undifferentiated EC (DDEC/UDEC; n=49), and grade 3 endometrioid EC with spindled growth (GR3spEEC) (n=17). All molecular subgroups were represented in all histologic subtypes and included 12 (7%) POLE -mutated ( POLE mut), 43 (27%) mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), 77 (48%) p53-abnormal (p53abn), and 30 (19%) no specific molecular profile (NSMP) tumors. However, the molecular classification (irrespective of histologic diagnosis) was a significant predictor for both DSS ( P =0.008) and P≤0.0001). POLE mut EC showed an excellent prognosis with no recurrences or deaths from the disease. MMRd tumors also showed better outcomes relative to NSMP and p53abn tumors. In conclusion, molecular classification provides better prognostic information than histologic diagnosis for high-grade EC with undifferentiated and sarcomatous components. Our study strongly supports routine molecular classification of these tumors, with emphasis on molecular group, rather than histologic subtyping, in providing prognostication.

Morules and β-catenin predict POLE mutation status in endometrial cancer: A pathway to more cost-effective diagnostic procedures

OBJECTIVES

The characterization of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutations has transformed the classification of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs), highlighting the need for efficient identification methods. This study aims to examine the relationship between distinct morphologic features-namely, squamous morules and squamous differentiation (SD), as well as β-catenin expression-and the POLE mutation status in endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

Our study included 35 POLE-mutated (POLEmut) EC cases and 395 non-POLEmut EEC cases.

RESULTS

Notably, we observed no presence of morules in POLEmut cases, while SD was identified in 20% of instances. Conversely, morules and SD were identified in 12.7% and 26.1% of non-POLEmut EC cases, respectively, with morules consistently linked to a POLE wild-type status. The nuclear β-catenin expression is typically absent in tumors with wild-type POLE (wt-POLE) status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the presence of either morules or nuclear β-catenin expression in EEC could practically rule out the presence of POLE mutations. These morphologic and immunohistochemical features can be used as preliminary screening tools for POLE mutations, offering significant savings in time and resources and potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and patient management strategies. However, further validation in larger, multi-institutional studies is required to fully understand the implications of these findings on clinical practice.

Unsolved Issues in the Integrated Histo-Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinoma and Therapeutic Implications

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most frequent gynecological cancer, with an increasing incidence and mortality in recent times. The last decade has represented a true revolution with the development of the integrated histo-molecular classification of EC, which allows for the stratification of patients with morphologically indistinguishable disease into groups with different prognoses. Particularly, the POLE-mutated subgroup exhibits outstanding survival. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate application of molecular classification appears premature. Its prognostic significance has been proven mainly in endometrioid EC, the most common histotype, but it has yet to be convincingly confirmed in the other minor histotypes, which indeed account for a relevant proportion of EC mortality. Moreover, its daily use both requires a mindful pathologist who is able to correctly evaluate and unambiguously report immunohistochemical staining used as a surrogated diagnostic tool and is hampered by the unavailability of POLE mutation analysis. Further molecular characterization of ECs is needed to allow for the identification of better-tailored therapies in different settings, as well as the safe avoidance of surgery for fertility preservation. Hopefully, the numerous ongoing clinical trials in the adjuvant and metastatic settings of EC will likely produce evidence to refine the histo-molecular classification and therapeutic guidelines. Our review aims to retrace the origin and evolution of the molecular classification for EC, reveal its strengths and limitations, show clinical relevance, and uncover the desired future developments.

Endometrial carcinoma: 10 years of TCGA (the cancer genome atlas): A critical reappraisal with comments on FIGO 2023 staging

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network described 4 molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinomas with different outcome: 1) POLE ultramutated endometrioid carcinomas which have an indolent behavior; 2) microsatellite instability hypermutated endometrioid carcinomas associated with intermediate prognosis; 3) copy-number low endometrioid carcinomas also with intermediate prognosis; and 4) copy-number high predominantly serous (non-endometrioid) but also serous-like endometrioid carcinomas, almost always carrying TP53 mutations, with poor clinical outcome. After 10 years of comprehensive analysis, it appears that the only real contribution of TCGA to the clinical management of these patients would be limited to the infrequent high-grade, early-stage endometrioid carcinomas with POLE exonuclease domain mutations, as these patients could benefit from a de-escalating treatment; knowledge about the other three subgroups has not changed significantly. The copy-number low (or non-specific genetic profile) which is the most frequent subgroup, is a mixture subgroup where investigators are currently trying to establish prognostic markers; for example, unexpected variations in a relatively small percentage of cases (i.e., CTNNB1 mutated or p53 aberrant low-grade and low-stage endometrioid carcinomas associated with unfavorable prognosis). On the other hand, TCGA has underlined that a small number of grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas, all TP53 mutated, overlap with copy-number high serous carcinomas. Recently, TCGA molecular subgroups have been integrated into the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification which incorporates other non-anatomic parameters like histotype, tumor grade, and lymphovascular space invasion. The result is a complicated and non-intuitive classification that makes its clinical application difficult and does not facilitate correspondence with the 2009 FIGO staging.

Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma Undergoing Various Postoperative Adjuvant Therapies

Purpose

To investigate prognostic factors affecting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and to analyze the survival outcomes of patients with undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UDEC) who underwent various postoperative adjuvant therapies.

Methods

The independent risk factors affecting CSS were studied using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and CSS in the presence of various postoperative treatments was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method based on the cohort with pathologically confirmed UDEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Meanwhile, the study included 18 cases with UDEC in our center and explored their molecular characteristics and prognosis.

Results

Between 2000 and 2019, a total of 443 patients were included from the SEER database. The median CSS duration was 14 months, with corresponding 3- and 5-year CSS rates of 45.9% and 44.0%, respectively. Factors such as pTNM stage, surgical resection of primary lesion, and chemoradiation independently influenced CSS. Postoperative chemotherapy alone improved CSS in patients with initial tumor spread beyond the uterus (pT3 and pT4), or lymph node (LN) invasion, or distant metastases. Additionally, postoperative radiotherapy enhanced CSS in patients who had undergone postoperative chemotherapy, those with primary tumors progressing to stage pT3, and those with LN involvement but without distant metastases. Of the 18 patients diagnosed at our center, with a median follow-up of 15.5 months, one experienced relapse and two succumbed to UDEC, who exhibited aberrant p53 expression in immunohistochemical staining.

Conclusion

Postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy are beneficial for UDEC patients with tumors extending beyond the uterus or involving lymph nodes.

Race, Prevalence of POLE and POLD1 Alterations, and Survival Among Patients With Endometrial Cancer

Importance

Black patients with endometrial cancer (EC) in the United States have higher mortality than patients of other races with EC. The prevalence of POLE and POLD1 pathogenic alterations in patients of different races with EC are not well studied.

Objective

To explore the prevalence of and outcomes associated with POLE and POLD1 alterations in differential racial groups.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study incorporated the largest available data set of patients with EC, including American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange; 5087 participants), Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms (1315 participants), and the Cancer Genome Atlas Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (517 participants), collected from 2015 to 2023, 2013 to 2021, and 2006 to 2012, respectively. The prevalence of and outcomes associated with POLE or POLD1 alterations in EC were evaluated across self-reported racial groups.

Exposure

Patients of different racial groups with EC and with or without POLE or POLD1 alterations.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was overall survival. Data on demographic characteristics, POLE and POLD1 alteration status, histologic subtype, tumor mutation burden, fraction of genome altered, and microsatellite instability score were collected.

Results

A total of 6919 EC cases were studied, of whom 444 (6.4%), 694 (10.0%), and 4869 (70.4%) patients were self-described as Asian, Black, and White, respectively. Within these large data sets, Black patients with EC exhibited a lower weighted average prevalence of pathogenic POLE alterations (0.5% [3 of 590 cases]) compared with Asian (6.1% [26 of 424]) or White (4.6% [204 of 4520]) patients. By contrast, the prevalence of POLD1 pathogenic alterations was 5.0% (21 cases), 3.2% (19 cases), and 5.6% (255 cases) in Asian, Black, and White patients with EC, respectively. Patients with POLD1 alterations had better outcomes regardless of race, histology, and TP53 alteration status. For a total of 241 clinically annotated Black patients with EC, a composite biomarker panel of either POLD1 or POLE alterations identified 7.1% (17 patients) with positive outcomes (1 event at 70 months follow up) in the small sample of available patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective clinicopathological study of patients of different racial groups with EC, a composite biomarker panel of either POLD1 or POLE alteration could potentially guide treatment de-escalation, which is especially relevant for Black patients.

Validation of Modaplex POLE mutation assay in endometrial carcinoma

The TCGA-based molecular classification of endometrial cancer has emerged as an important tool to stratify patients according to prognosis. A simplified scheme has been proposed, by using immunohistochemistry for p53, MSH6, and PMS2 and a molecular test for POLE mutations (NGS or Sanger sequencing, techniques that are not available in many centers worldwide). In this study, we validate a novel method that allows simultaneous analysis of multiple pathogenic POLE mutations. The Modaplex technology integrates polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis. The design of this study encompassed 4 different steps: (1) a retrospective-pilot phase, with 80 tumors, balancing the four molecular subgroups. (2) A retrospective phase of 25 tumors obtained between 2016 and 2020, and 30 tumors obtained between 2000 and 2015. (3) An inter-laboratory corssavalidation step with 19 cases (belonging to phases 1 and 2). (4) A prospective cohort of 123 tumors, of unknown POLE status, with simultaneous validation by Sanger sequencing. A total of 258 samples were analyzed. In the first and second phases, the test showed positive/negative predictive values of 100%, by correctly identifying POLE mutation status in 79/79 and 55/55 cases. Phase 3 showed 100% of inter-laboratory consistency. Phase 4 showed 16 positive samples out of the 123 prospective cases. Overall, the test has revealed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, identifying a total of 47 POLE-mutated tumors. We have shown that this technique allows faster and easier identification of multiple pathogenic POLE mutations with high robustness and confidence when comparing to other tests such as Sanger sequencing.

Multisequence MRI-based radiomics model for predicting POLE mutation status in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative identification of POLE mutation status would help tailor the surgical procedure and adjuvant treatment strategy. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of developing a radiomics model to pre-operatively predict the pathogenic POLE mutation status in patients with EC.

METHODS

The retrospective study involved 138 patients with histopathologically confirmed EC (35 POLE-mutant vs 103 non-POLE-mutant). After selecting relevant features with a series of steps, three radiomics signatures were built based on axial fat-saturation T2WI, DWI, and CE-T1WI images, respectively. Then, two radiomics models which integrated features from T2WI + DWI and T2WI + DWI+CE-T1WI were further developed using multivariate logistic regression. The performance of the radiomics model was evaluated from discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility aspects.

RESULTS

Among all the models, radiomics model2 (RM2), which integrated features from all three sequences, showed the best performance, with AUCs of 0.885 (95%CI: 0.828-0.942) and 0.810 (95%CI: 0.653-0.967) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analyses indicated that RM2 had improvement in predicting POLE mutation status when compared with the single-sequence-based signatures and the radiomics model1 (RM1). The calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curve suggested favourable calibration and clinical utility of RM2.

CONCLUSIONS

The RM2, fusing features from three sequences, could be a potential tool for the non-invasive preoperative identification of patients with POLE-mutant EC, which is helpful for developing individualized therapeutic strategies.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study developed a potential surrogate of POLE sequencing, which is cost-efficient and non-invasive.

Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma: A Rare Aggressive Neoplasm-Clinical, Morphological and Immunohistochemical Features

Dedifferentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma is characterised by the coexistence of an undifferentiated carcinoma and a low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The low-grade component in this subtype of endometrial carcinoma is Grade 1 or 2 according to the Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system. The coexistence of low-grade endometrial carcinoma and solid undifferentiated carcinoma can cause diagnostic problems on histological examination. In fact, this combination can often be mistaken for a more common Grade 2 or Grade 3 endometrial carcinoma. Therefore, this subtype of uterine carcinoma can often go under-recognised. An accurate diagnosis of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is mandatory because of its poorer prognosis compared to Grade 3 endometrial carcinoma, with a solid undifferentiated component that can amount to as much as 20% of the entire tumour. The aim of this review is to provide clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular data to aid with making an accurate histological diagnosis and to establish whether there are any findings which could have an impact on the prognosis or therapeutic implications of this rare and aggressive uterine neoplasm.

Genomic profiling of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas arising in the background of high-grade carcinoma: a targeted next-generation sequencing study

AIMS

Our understanding of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DEC), a rare and aggressive malignancy, mainly reflects undifferentiated carcinomas (UC) arising in the setting of low-grade endometrial cancer (DEC-LG). However, cases of UC arising in the setting of high-grade EC (DEC-HG) have been noted in the literature. Our knowledge of the genomics of DEC-HG is limited. To characterise the molecular landscape of DEC-HC, targeted genomic sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis was carried out on seven DEC-HG and four DEC-LG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DEC-HG and DEC-LG, including undifferentiated and differentiated components, both showed a similar frequency and spectrum of mutations. ARID1A mutations were identified in 6/7 (86%) DEC-HG and 4/4 (100%) DEC-LG, while SMARCA4 mutations were present in 4/7 (57%) DEC-HG and in 1/4 (25%) DEC-LG. Concurrent SMARCA4/BRG1 protein loss by immunohistochemistry was observed in 3/4 and 1/1 SMARCA4 mutated DEC-HG and DEC-LG, respectively. Neither genomic alterations nor protein loss in SMARCB1/INI1 were observed in any of our cases. TP53 mutations were detected in 4/7 (57%) DEC-HG and in 2/4 (50%) DEC-LG, while mutation-pattern p53 immunohistochemistry expression was observed in 2/7 (29%) DEC-HG and none of the DEC-LG. MLH1 mutations were observed in 1/7 (14%) DEC-HG and 1/4 (25%) DEC-LG. MSH2 and MSH6 mutations were each detected in 1/7 (14%) DEC-HG, but neither was associated with corresponding loss of protein expression.

CONCLUSION

The findings support expanding the definition of DEC to include DEC-HG, a previously under-recognised phenomenon with genomic similarities to DEC-LG.

Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and the 2023 FIGO Staging: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Pathologists

This commentary explores the complexities of the FIGO 2023 staging system and the inclusion of The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA) molecular classification in the management of endometrial cancer. It highlights the importance of histology as a prognostic tool, while scrutinizing the merits and demerits of its application to aggressive endometrial cancers. The commentary review sheds light on the recent introductions of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis size in cancer staging. It outlines the difficulties in differentiating between synchronous and metastatic endometrial and ovarian cancers, underlining their implications on treatment strategies. Furthermore, the commentary discusses the integration of molecular classifications within the FIGO 2023 framework, emphasizing the pivotal yet challenging implementation of the pathogenic POLE mutation test. The commentary concludes by reaffirming the vital role of pathologists in executing the FIGO 2023 staging system.

Role of Genomic and Molecular Biology in the Modulation of the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Narrative Review and Perspectives

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies in Western countries. Traditionally, loco-reginal dissemination and histological characteristics are the main prognostic factors. Nowadays, molecular and genomic profiling showed exciting results in terms of prognostication. According to the data provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas and other studies, molecular and genomic profiling might be useful in identifying patients al low, intermediate, and high risk of recurrence. However, data regarding the therapeutic value are scant. Several prospective studies are ongoing to identify the most appropriate adjuvant strategy in EC patients, especially for those with positive nodes and low volume disease. The molecular classification has offered the possibility to improve the risk stratification and management of EC. The aim of this review is to focus on the evolution of molecular classification in EC and its impact on the research approach and on clinical management. Molecular and genomic profiling might be useful to tailor the most appropriate adjuvant strategies in apparent early-stage EC.

TCGA Molecular Prognostic Groups of Endometrial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

The four TCGA-based molecular prognostic groups of endometrial carcinoma (EC), i.e., POLE-mutant, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient, p53-abnormal, and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP), have recently been integrated into ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines. The POLE-mutant and MMR-deficient groups are associated with high mutational load, morphological heterogeneity, and inflammatory infiltration. These groups are frequent in high-grade endometrioid, undifferentiated/dedifferentiated, and mixed histotypes. POLE-mutant ECs show good prognosis and do not require adjuvant treatment, although the management of cases at stage >II is still undefined. MMR-deficient ECs show intermediate prognosis and are currently substratified based on clinicopathological variables, some of which might not have prognostic value. These groups may benefit from immunotherapy. P53-mutant ECs are typically high-grade and often morphologically ambiguous, accounting for virtually all serous ECs, most carcinosarcomas and mixed ECs, and half of clear-cell ECs. They show poor prognosis and are treated with chemoradiotherapy; a subset may benefit from HER2 inhibitors or PARP inhibitors. The NSMP group is the most frequent TCGA group; its prognosis is highly variable and affected by clinicopathological/molecular factors, most of which are still under evaluation. In conclusion, the TCGA classification has improved diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of EC. Further studies are needed to resolve the points of uncertainty that still exist.

Less is more in endometrial cancer (SLN, conservative treatment, radical hysterectomy, molecular classification)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of endometrial cancer has known many evolutions within the last decades. In this review, we aim to summarize recent evolutions (mainly toward less aggressive management) that have occurred in the management of endometrial cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced by molecular classification, the determination of lymph node status, in young women, in case of cervical invasion, the treatment is evolving toward a less aggressive strategy.

SUMMARY

The predictive value and the safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy explain why most societies propose to abandon systematic pelvic and para aortic lymphadenectomy. For young women, the safety of fertility preservation is now well established and efficient protocols have been validated. In stage II endometrial cancer (stromal cervical invasion), radical hysterectomy appears excessive. The Cancer Genome Atlas classification increases prognostic evaluation in association with the traditional pathological classification and permits to tailor adjuvant treatment more accurately.

Endometrial Cancer: An Update on Prognostic Pathologic Features and Clinically Relevant Biomarkers

The prognosis of endometrial cancers has historically been determined by the evaluation of histologic typing, grading, and staging. Recently, molecular classification, pioneered by the 4 prognostic categories from The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, has been shown to independently predict the outcome, correlate with biomarker expression, and predict response to adjuvant chemotherapy. In modern-day pathology practice, it has become necessary to integrate the time-honored prognostic pathologic features with molecular classification to optimize patient management. In this review, the significance of the molecular classification of endometrioid carcinomas, the application of practical diagnostic surrogate algorithms, and interpretation of test results will be addressed. Histologic features and theragnostic biomarkers will also be discussed in relation to the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancers.

Uncommon and Difficult High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas

This article presents features of uncommon high-grade endometrial carcinomas that often pose a significant diagnostic challenge. An update on undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is first provided, followed by discussions on more recently defined entities such as mesonephric-like carcinoma of the endometrium and gastric-type endometrial carcinomas. Finally, endometrial carcinoma with germ cell or trophoblastic-like components is discussed.

Prospective molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas: institutional implementation, practice, and clinical experience

The comprehensive genomic analysis of endometrial carcinoma (EC) by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) led to the discovery of four distinct and prognostically significant molecular subgroups. Molecular classification has the potential to improve risk-stratification when integrated with clinicopathologic features and has recently been included in national and international patient management EC guidelines. Thus, the adoption of molecular classification into routine pathologic and clinical practice is likely to grow significantly in the upcoming years. Establishing an efficient and standardized workflow for performing molecular classification on ECs, and reporting both the molecular and histologic findings in an integrative manner, is imperative. Here we describe our effort to implement rapid and routine molecular classification on all ECs diagnosed at our institution. To this effect, we performed immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker for identifying genetic and/or epigenetic alterations in DNA mismatch repair (e.g., MLH1, PMS2, MSH6, MSH2), and TP53 genes. In addition, we have developed and employed a single-gene POLE SNaPshot assay, which is a rapid and analytically sensitive method for detecting select POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs). We report our molecular testing workflow and integrative reporting system as well as the clinicopathologic and molecular features of 310 ECs that underwent routine molecular classification at our institution. The 310 ECs were molecularly classified as follows: 15 (5%) POLE mutant (POLEmut), 79 (25%) mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), 135 (44%) no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and 81 (26%) p53 abnormal (p53abnl). This work provides an initial framework for implementing routine molecular classification of ECs.

ZEB1 expression is frequently detected in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinomas, but is not specific among endometrial carcinomas

AIMS

The pathological diagnosis of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UC/DCs) is prognostically important. However, undifferentiated components may be confused with other subtypes, particularly grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (G3ECs). ZEB1 has recently been identified as a promising marker because it is frequently expressed in the undifferentiated components of UC/DCs, but not in other carcinomas. Therefore, we herein evaluated the diagnostic utility of ZEB1 with an emphasis on distinguishing between UC/DCs and G3ECs using an expanded cohort of endometrial carcinomas and carcinosarcomas.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunostaining for ZEB1 was performed on whole-tissue sections of 19 UC/DCs, 194 non-UC/DC endometrial carcinomas, and 29 carcinosarcomas. Staining was defined as negative (<5%), focal (5-50%), and diffuse expression (>50%). ZEB1 was expressed in 84% of the undifferentiated components of UC/DCs (diffuse in 14, focal in two). Focal expression was observed in eight non-UC/DC endometrial carcinomas and diffuse expression in seven, with the latter comprising G3ECs (4/76), serous carcinoma (1/37), clear cell carcinoma (1/21), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (1/3). Epithelial differentiation was morphologically and immunohistochemically less evident in G3ECs and neuroendocrine carcinoma with diffuse ZEB1 expression. All carcinosarcomas showed diffuse ZEB1 expression in their sarcomatous components.

CONCLUSION

Immunostaining for ZEB1 was sufficiently sensitive to detect undifferentiated components. Diffuse ZEB1 expression showed high specificity for distinguishing between undifferentiated components and G3ECs; however, ZEB1 expression was not entirely specific to UC/DCs. The integration of ZEB1 into the diagnosis of UC/DCs requires careful examinations to exclude other tumours, such as less differentiated G3ECs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and carcinosarcomas.

A Timely Update of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Classification in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Endometrial Carcinomas

CONTEXT.—

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and has been traditionally classified based on histology. However, the distinction of certain histologic subtypes based on morphology is not uncommonly problematic, and as such, immunohistochemical study is often needed. Advances in comprehensive tumor sequencing have provided novel molecular profiles of endometrial carcinomas. Four distinct molecular subtypes with different prognostic values have been proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas program: polymerase epsilon ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy number low (microsatellite stable or no specific molecular profile), and copy number high (serouslike, p53 mutant).

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the utilities of commonly used immunohistochemical markers for the classification of endometrial carcinomas and to review the recent advancements of The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular reclassification and their potential impact on treatment strategies.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The current practice of classifying endometrial cancers is predominantly based on morphology. The use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, is helpful in the identification, differential diagnosis, and classification of these cancers. New developments such as molecular subtyping have provided insightful prognostic values for endometrial carcinomas. The proposed The Cancer Genome Atlas classification is poised to gain further prominence in guiding the prognostic evaluation for tailored treatment strategies in the near future.

Progress in the pathological arena of gynecological cancers

This review covers the significant new developments in the pathological classification of gynecological tumors. Many of these were included in the updated World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tract Tumours, published in 2020. Topics include the compelling evidence that a large majority of extrauterine high‐grade serous carcinomas arise from the fallopian tube; the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Classification of endometrial carcinomas; the discovery that most so‐called synchronous endometrial and ovarian endometrioid carcinomas represent metastasis from the endometrium to the ovary; and the division of cervical, vaginal, and vulval carcinomas into clinically meaningful HPV‐associated and HPV‐independent types. Newly described tumor types are covered, including endometrial and ovarian mesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma, uterine sarcoma types associated with specific molecular abnormalities, and gastric (gastrointestinal)‐type adenocarcinomas of the endometrium and vagina. Important molecular events in ovarian sex cord–stromal tumors are also discussed.

Review of significant new developments in the classification of gynecological tumors; many are included in the 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tract Tumours.

Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma

Background

The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE‐mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite‐instable/mismatch repair‐deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53‐mutated/p53‐abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP).

Objective

Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

Search strategy

Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021.

Selection criteria

Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS.

Data collection and analysis

Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050.

Main results

Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts.

Conclusion

POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined.

POLEmut UCS show the same excellent prognosis as POLEmut endometrioid carcinomas, while TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas.

SWI/SNF-deficient undifferentiated/rhabdoid carcinoma of the gallbladder carrying a POLE mutation in a 30-year-old woman: a case report

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the biliary tract are highly aggressive malignancies. In other organs, a subgroup of undifferentiated carcinoma related to SWI/SNF complex-deficiency have been described.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old woman presented with rising inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP)). Ultrasound examination revealed a large tumor of the liver. A computed tomography scan was performed and was primarily interpreted as a tumor-forming liver abscess, possibly caused by gallbladder perforation. Subsequent liver segment resection was performed. Microscopic examination showed an undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid morphology and prominent inflammatory infiltrate in the gallbladder base. With SWI/SNF immunohistochemistry, intact expression of SMARCB1, SMARCA4, ARID1A, but loss of SMARCA2 and PBRM1 was detected. Next-generation-sequencing detected KRAS, PBRM1 and ARID1B mutations, a deleterious splice-site mutation in the POLE-gene and a mutation in the TP53-gene.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to demonstrate loss of SMARCA2 expression and mutations characteristic of an SWI/SNF-deficient carcinoma in a tumor derived from the gallbladder. This is the first reported case of an undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid features in the gallbladder carrying a POLE mutation and SWI/SNF-deficiency of PBRM1 and SMARCA2.

Clinico-pathological significance of TCGA classification and SWI/SNF proteins expression in undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: A possible prognostic risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC/DDEC) is a heterogeneous entity, which may show any of the TCGA molecular signatures and loss of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) proteins expression.

AIM

To assess the clinico-pathological significance of the TCGA molecular groups and SWI/SNF proteins expression in UEC/DDEC, through a quantitative systematic review.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for all studies assessing the TCGA molecular groups, i.e. POLE-mutant, mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), p53-abnormal (p53abn) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and/or the SWI/SNF proteins (SMARCA4/BRG1, SMARCB1/INI1, ARID1B) expression in UEC/DDEC. Student t-test, Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with long-rank test were used to assess differences among groups; a p-value<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Among the TCGA groups, the mean patient age was significantly higher in the p53abn group than in the NSMP group (p = 0.048). The POLE-mutant group showed advanced FIGO stage (III-IV) significantly less commonly than the NSMP (p = 0.003) and MMRd (p = 0.008) groups, and a significantly better prognosis than the NSMP (p = 0.007), MMRd (p = 0.011) and p53abn (p = 0.045) groups.The SWI/SNF-deficient cases showed a significantly worse prognosis than the SWI/SNF-intact cases (p = 0.010), while no significant differences were found regarding patient age and FIGO stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Among UEC/DDEC, POLE-mutant cases show good prognosis, while SWI/SNF-deficient cases show poor prognosis. The other TCGA molecular subtypes seem to be characterized by an intermediate biological behaviour. On this account, UEC/DDEC patients might be subdivided into three risk groups based on POLE and SWI/SNF status. Further studies are necessary in this field.

Genetic and molecular subtype heterogeneity in newly diagnosed early- and advanced-stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To characterize and compare the molecular subtypes and profiles of prospectively-accrued newly-diagnosed early- and advanced-stage endometrial cancers (ECs).

METHODS

EC patients consented to an IRB-approved protocol of massively parallel sequencing of 410-468 cancer-related genes; 175 ECs of 7 histologic types (n = 135 FIGO stages I/II, n = 40 FIGO stages III/IV) were included. Previously reported sequencing data from 99 additional advanced-stage ECs were retrieved for comparisons.

RESULTS

Irrespective of histologic type, all 175 ECs could be stratified into the molecular subtypes, with 75 (43%) being of p53 wild-type, 49 (28%) MMR-deficient, 39 (22%) p53 abnormal and 12 (7%) of POLE molecular subtypes. Subtype distribution, mutational and copy number profiles varied according to histologic type. In endometrioid ECs, genetic alterations varied according to histologic grade. Potential therapeutic targets, including high tumor mutational burden, ERBB2 amplification and PIK3CA hotspot mutations, were found across histologic types in 63% (n = 110) of all ECs. Compared to their early-stage counterparts, advanced-stage endometrioid ECs had a significantly higher fraction of genome altered (median 0.1% vs 12%, p < 0.001) and ARID1B mutations (0% vs 11%, p = 0.01), and advanced-stage serous ECs harbored more frequent ERBB2 amplification (18% vs 8%, p > 0.05) and PIK3CA mutations (46% vs 27%, p > 0.05). Whole-genome doubling was found in advanced- but not early-stage carcinosarcomas and clear cell carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the molecular heterogeneity within and across histologic types of EC and the increased genomic complexity of advanced-stage ECs. Molecular subtypes are present across EC histologic types and may help stratify EC patients for prognostic and therapeutic purposes.

Endometrial carcinoma: molecular subtypes, precursors and the role of pathology in early diagnosis

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is classified into a wide range of morphological variants; this list has expanded over the past decade with the inclusion of mesonephric-like and dedifferentiated carcinoma as EC variants in the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours, and recognition that carcinosarcoma is a biphasic carcinoma rather than a sarcoma. Each EC variant has distinct molecular abnormalities, including TCGA-based molecular subtypes, allowing further subclassification and adding complexity. In contrast to this rapid progress in understanding EC, there are only two recognized EC precursor lesions: endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EAH/EIN) and serous intraepithelial carcinoma, a situation that has not changed for many years. Diagnosis of EC precursors is a cornerstone of surgical pathology practice, with early diagnosis contributing to the relatively favorable prognosis of EC. In this review we relate the precursor lesions to each of the EC morphological variants and molecular subtypes, discuss how successful early diagnosis is for each variant/molecular subtype and how it might be improved, and identify knowledge gaps where there is insufficient understanding of EC histogenesis. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

BRG1, INI1, and ARID1B Deficiency in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of a Large Series From a Single Institution

Switch/sucrose nonfermenting complex subunits, such as BRG1, INI1, and ARID1B, are inactivated in a subset of endometrial undifferentiated carcinoma and dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC). Limited information is currently available on their prevalence in other subtypes or the nosological status of endometrial carcinoma with their deficiencies. This study immunohistochemically examined the expression status of BRG1, INI1, and ARID1B using 570 archived cases of endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma resected at a single institution. We identified 1 BRG1-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma, 8 BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC, and 3 BRG1-deficient clear-cell carcinomas. None of the cases of endometrioid and serous carcinomas or carcinosarcoma showed deficiencies of these subunits. We then compared 8 BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC with 6 BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact DC and 28 carcinosarcomas, the latter of which was often confused with DC. Histologically, BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact and BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC shared a monotonous solid appearance with rhabdoid and epithelioid cells and a myxoid stroma; however, abrupt keratinization and cell spindling was absent in BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient tumors. The median overall survival of patients with BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC was 3.8 months, which was worse than those with BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact DC (P=0.008) and with carcinosarcoma (P=0.004). BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC may be a separate entity with an aggressive behavior to be distinguished from BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact DC and carcinosarcoma. Regarding clear-cell carcinoma (n=12), BRG1 deficiency appeared to be mutually exclusive with abnormal ARID1A, BRM, and p53 expression. Further studies are needed to clarify whether BRG1 deficiency plays a role in the pathogenesis of clear-cell carcinoma.

Clinico-pathological features associated with mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endometrial undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma (UDC/DDC) is a recently described aggressive variant of endometrial carcinoma, which shows mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in about half of cases.

AIM

To assess whether MMR-deficient UDC/DDC have distinct clinico-pathological features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching 4 electronic databases from their inception to October 2020 for all studies reporting clinicopathological characteristics of UDC/DDC series. Student t-test (for continuous variables), Cox regression analysis (for overall survival) and odds ratio (OR, for dichotomous variables) were used with a significant p-value < 0.05; data were pooled by using a random effect model.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. MMR-deficiency was significantly associated with older age (p = 0.024), p53-wild-type (p = 0.005), ARID1A loss (p = 0.001) and PD-L1 expression (p = 0.019), but not with overall survival (p = 0.307), extension beyond corpus (p = 0.787) or beyond uterus (p = 0.403), presence of a differentiated component (p = 0.461), loss of expression of cytokeratins (p = 0.698), EMA (p = 0.309), estrogen receptor (p = 0.605), PAX8 (p = 0.959), SMARCA4/BRG1 (p = 0.321), SMARCB1/INI1 (p = 0.225) or claudin-4 (p = 0.094), or POLE exonuclease domain mutation p = (0.773).

CONCLUSIONS

In UDC/DDC, MMR-deficiency appears associated with older age, p53-wild type and ARID1A loss, suggesting the possibility of a distinct pathway underlying dedifferentiation; the association with PD-L1 expression is attributable to the high mutational load and may have therapeutic implications. On the other hand, MMR-deficiency appears not to be associated with prognosis, stage, loss of differentiation markers or POLE mutation.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated neoplasms of the female genital tract

Undifferentiated neoplasms in the female gynecologic tract comprise two main groups-undifferentiated carcinoma, most common in the endometrium and ovary, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, although tumors with an undifferentiated appearance may occur in all gynecologic organs. Their differential diagnosis is broad and generous sampling, careful morphological evaluation, judicious use of immunohistochemistry, and in many cases, molecular testing is often essential in the diagnostic work-up. As some of these neoplasms fail to respond to conventional chemotherapy regimens and/or radiation therapy, targeted therapy may be valuable in treating these highly aggressive tumors, thus the importance of precise diagnosis. In this review we discuss the clinicopathological features of undifferentiated carcinoma, dedifferentiated carcinoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, followed by a comprehensive analysis of morphological mimickers. Finally, we briefly review ovarian and lower genital tract tumors with an undifferentiated histological appearance.

Molecular Profiles of Mixed Endometrial Carcinoma

Mixed endometrial carcinomas are defined as a combination of 2 or more distinct histologic subtypes, one of which must be a type II tumor comprising at least 5% of the tumor volume. The oncogenesis of these tumors remains unclear, particularly in light of the increasingly appreciated morphologic overlap among subtypes, as well as evolving molecular data. We evaluated 8 cases of mixed endometrial carcinoma, including 4 endometrioid (EC)/serous (SC), 1 SC/clear cell (CC), and 3 EC/CC cases, to study the underlying molecular features and oncogenic mechanisms at play. Each component was analyzed by a targeted next-generation sequencing assay. All tumors shared mutations in both components. In 6 cases, one component showed additional mutations. Two EC/SC cases showed shared mutations and mutations unique to each component. When present, unique mutations were typically seen in the SC component, including variants in POLE and TP53, as well as potentially targetable genes DDR2, MAP2K1, and CCNE1. In EC/SC tumors, ERBB2 abnormalities were seen in 2 cases. EC/CC cases showed FGFR2 activating mutations in the EC component only. No fusion drivers were identified. Our data suggest that the majority of these tumors begin as a single clone and diverge along 2 pathways: (1) tumor progression, with one component showing additional mutations, and (2) tumor divergence, in which tumor components have both shared mutations and mutations unique to each component. In addition, the findings suggest a component of morphologic mimicry in these tumors. Our findings are clinically relevant since targetable mutations may be present in only one component of mixed tumors.

Clinicopathological significance of multiple molecular features in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas

We investigated the clinicopathological significance of multiple molecular features in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDECs). Eighteen dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (DDECs) and three undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UECs) were collected. Polymerase-ε exonuclease domain mutations (POLE-EDM) were analysed by Sanger sequencing. SWI/SNF complex subunits, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, and PD-L1 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The SWI/SNF complex was inactivated in half of the UDECs; variably combined with deficient MMR (dMMR), POLE-EDM, or p53 aberrance. Deficiencies in BRG1 and ARID1A were mutually exclusive (p<0.05) in DDECs. ARID1A defects were mostly (8/9) associated with dMMR and typically occurred simultaneously in both endometrioid and dedifferentiated components, whereas BRG1 defects were less frequently (3/7) combined with dMMR and were only observed in dedifferentiated cells. Two-thirds of the UDECs displayed dMMR, mainly caused by the MLH1 promotor methylation. Mutant p53 immunostaining was detected in accordant or subclonal patterns. All three POLE-EDM UDEC patients had stage IA disease with either dMMR or p53 abnormality. Strong positive signals for PD-L1 were mainly detected in dMMR samples. BRG1 defects may likely trigger the progression of dedifferentiation in UDECs by superimposing the pre-existing driver events or by initiating UECs de novo, whereas ARID1A inactivation is subordinate and may likely be secondary to dMMR. The biological behaviours of BRG1-intact UDECs were evaluated according to The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular classification; their driver events require further analysis. Exact molecular subtypes can be helpful for clinical management and treatment decisions for patients with UDEC.

Establishment and characterization of VOA1066 cells: An undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma cell line

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DDEC) is a rare but highly aggressive type of endometrial cancer, in which an undifferentiated carcinoma arises from a low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. The low-grade component is often eclipsed, likely due to an outgrowth of the undifferentiated component, and the tumor may appear as a pure undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC). We and others have recently identified inactivating mutations of SMARCA4, SMARCB1 or ARID1B, subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, that are unique to the undifferentiated component and are present in a large portion of DDEC and UEC. However, the understanding of whether and how these mutations drive cancer progression and histologic dedifferentiation is hindered by lack of cell line models of DDEC or UEC. Here, we established the first UEC cell line, VOA1066, which is highly tumorigenic in vivo. This cell line has a stable genome with very few somatic mutations, which do include inactivating mutations of ARID1A and ARID1B (2 mutations each), and a heterozygous hotspot DICER1 mutation in its RNase IIIb domain. Immunohistochemistry staining confirmed the loss of ARID1B, but ARID1A staining was retained due to the presence of a truncating non-functional ARID1A protein. The heterozygous DICER1 hotspot mutation has little effect on microRNA biogenesis. No additional DICER1 hotspot mutations have been identified in a cohort of 33 primary tumors. Therefore, we have established the first UEC cell line with dual inactivation of both ARID1A and ARID1B as the main genomic feature. This cell line will be useful for studying the roles of ARID1A and ARID1B mutations in the development of UEC.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma arising in the background of high-grade endometrial carcinoma - Expanding the definition of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

Dedifferentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma (DEC) is defined by the coexistence of undifferentiated carcinoma with low-grade (FIGO grade 1 or 2) endometrioid carcinoma. Few cases of DEC arising in the background of high-grade carcinoma (DEC-HG) have been reported, however, this phenomenon is poorly characterized. In this study we describe the morphologic, immunohistochemical and clinico-pathologic characteristics of DEC-HG. 18 DECs were diagnosed at our institution between 2008-2019, and in 11 (61%), the undifferentiated component was associated with high-grade carcinoma (8 endometrioid FIGO grade 3, 2 with ambiguous features, 1 serous). The remaining 7 (39%) represented DEC-LG (3 FIGO grade 1 and 4 FIGO grade 2). 7/11 (64%) patients with DEC-HG presented with advanced stage (FIGO stage III/IV), whereas most with DEC-LG (6/7, 86%) were stage I. On follow up, 2 patients in the DEC-HG group died of disease and 2 had progressive disease within 2 months of surgery. There was only one recurrence in the DEC-LG, 6 months post-surgery. The DEC component in both groups showed similar morphology and immunophenotype, with predominantly focal or complete loss of expression of pan-keratin, EMA, E-cadherin, CK8/18, PAX8 and ER. The DEC component in the DEC-HG group had wild-type p53 expression in 8/11 (73%) cases, loss of MLH1 and PMS2 in 6/11 (55%) and loss of SMARCA4 in 3/9 (33%). Although numbers are small, we show that DEC-HG is a previously under-recognized phenomenon, with morphologic and immunophenotypic similarities to DEC-LG, which supports expanding the definition of DEC to include DEC-HG. DEC-HG may be more aggressive than DEC-LG.

SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies of the female genital tract

Mutations and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies, including those arising at various sites in the female genital tract. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas in the uterine corpus and ovary not uncommonly contain mutations in ARID1A and these also occur in other endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasms such as seromucinous tumours. In these organs, mutations in SMARCA4, SMARCB1, ARID1A and ARID1B (with subsequent loss of corresponding protein expression as a reliable surrogate) are relatively common in undifferentiated carcinomas, including the undifferentiated component of dedifferentiated carcinoma. SMARCA4 mutations are extremely common (almost ubiquitous) in small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcaemic type (SCCOHT), occurring in about 98% of these neoplasms, often in association with epigenetic SMARCA2 loss. SMARCB1-deficient vulval neoplasms include epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelial carcinoma, as well as related malignancies which defy easy classification. Recently the spectrum of SWI/SNF deficient female genital malignancies has been expanded to include SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and mural nodules of anaplastic carcinoma in ovarian mucinous neoplasms.

Dedifferentiated and undifferentiated neoplasms: A conceptual approach

This review provides a conceptual approach to dedifferentiation across a variety of tumor types, with particular attention to genetic events that tie together morphologically disparate areas of these neoplasms. First, working definitions of the terms differentiated, undifferentiated, and dedifferentiated are developed. Then, specific examples of tumors with a particular propensity for undergoing dedifferentiation are highlighted, with emphasis on both immunohistochemical studies and molecular lesions that enable surgical pathologists to establish diagnostic clarity in morphologically vexing situations. Throughout this review, the historical arc of the literature is followed, and therefore the discussion of specific tumor types begins with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, the neoplasm that inspired the terminology regarding dedifferentiation that remains in use today. Selected other sarcomas with well-established pathways of dedifferentiation are subsequently discussed, followed by descriptions of this process in subtypes of carcinoma and melanoma.

The frequency of POLE-mutation in endometrial carcinoma and prognostic implications: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is classified into four distinct molecular subgroups including ultramutated DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). POLE-mutated tumors have the best prognosis and are a promising target for immunotherapy. This meta-analysis consolidated the reported variation of POLE-mutant frequency and assessed prognostic value in EC.

Methods

Internet searches explored scientific data bases: EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Data was extracted from eligible studies including: sample size, number of positive POLE-mutant cases, sequencing information, clinicopathologic data, and survival data. Meta-analysis and a random-effects model produced pooled estimates of POLE frequency and prognostic parameters using 95% confidence intervals (CI), hazard ratios (HR), and odd ratios (OR).

Results

Six thousand three hundred and forty-six EC patient cases were pooled from 25 studies. The pooled proportion of POLE gene mutation in EC was 8.59% (95% CI, 7.01 to 10.32), of which 8.22% (95% CI, 6.27 to 10.42) were type I and 0.93% (95% CI, 0.34 to 1.81) type 2. Clinicopathologic data showed that POLE-mutated tumors are mostly endometrioid. They present at higher levels in earlier stages (I–II) of EC (89.51%; 95% CI, 81.11 to 95.66) at the highest grade III (51.53%; 95% CI, 36.08 to 66.84) with reduced myometrial invasion (OR, 1.48, 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.20). Survival analysis indicated favorable overall survival (HR, 0.90), disease-specific survival (HR, 0.41), and progression-free survival (HR, 0.23) for POLE mutant EC.

Conclusions

Almost one-tenth of EC patients have POLE-mutated tumors. Given their improved prognostic potential, identifying the POLE mutation status is key for the management of EC patients.

Medullary Pancreatic Carcinoma Due to Somatic POLE Mutation: A Distinctive Pancreatic Carcinoma With Marked Long-Term Survival

Medullary pancreatic carcinoma (MPC) is a rare histological variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Because of its rarity, data on the molecular background of MPC are limited. Previous studies have shown that a subset of MPCs is microsatellite instable due to mismatch repair deficiency. Here, we present a unique case of a female patient in her 60s who is a long-term survivor after surgery for pancreatic cancer. The patient had a microsatellite stable MPC with a somatic mutation of the polymerase epsilon gene (POLE). Both microsatellite instable and POLE-mutated cancers are usually associated with high tumor mutational burden and antigen load, resulting in a prominent antitumor immune response and overall better survival. The current case illustrates that, in addition to mismatch repair deficiency, MPC can develop because of a somatic POLE mutation, resulting in a tumor with a high tumor mutational burden and leading to a better prognosis compared with conventional PDAC. This new finding may have important implications in the management of patients with MPC and calls for further studies on the role of POLE in PDAC.

SWI/SNF Complex Mutations in Gynecologic Cancers: Molecular Mechanisms and Models

The SWI/SNF (mating type SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable) chromatin remodeling complexes interact with histones and transcription factors to modulate chromatin structure and control gene expression. These evolutionarily conserved multisubunit protein complexes are involved in regulating many biological functions, such as differentiation and cell proliferation. Genomic studies have revealed frequent mutations of genes encoding multiple subunits of the SWI/SNF complexes in a wide spectrum of cancer types, including gynecologic cancers. These SWI/SNF mutations occur at different stages of tumor development and are restricted to unique histologic types of gynecologic cancers. Thus, SWI/SNF mutations have to function in the appropriate tissue and cell context to promote gynecologic cancer initiation and progression. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of SWI/SNF mutations in the development of gynecologic cancers to provide insights into both molecular pathogenesis and possible treatment implications for these diseases.

TCGA Classification of Endometrial Cancer: the Place of Carcinosarcoma

In 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network found four novel prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: POLE/ultramutated (POLE), microsatellite-instable/hypermutated (MSI), copy-number-low/TP53-wild-type (CNL), and copy-number-highTP53-mutant (CNH). However, poor is known regarding uncommon histotypes of endometrial cancer. We aimed to assess the genetic profile of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) on the light of these findings. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through electronic databases searching (up to July 2019). All studies assessing UCS series for the TCGA classification were included. For each TCGA subgroup, pooled prevalence on the total UCS number was calculated. Four studies with 231 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of the TCGA subgroups were: 5.3% for the POLE subgroup, 7.3% for the MSI subgroup, 73.9% for the CNH subgroup, 13.5% for the CNL subgroup. The CNH subgroup predominates in UCS, while subgroups with high mutational load (POLE and MSI) are less common. UCS appears as a preferential evolution of CNH carcinomas.

Epigenetic driver mutations in ARID1A shape cancer immune phenotype and immunotherapy

Whether mutations in cancer driver genes directly affect cancer immune phenotype and T cell immunity remains a standing question. ARID1A is a core member of the polymorphic BRG/BRM-associated factor chromatin remodeling complex. ARID1A mutations occur in human cancers and drive cancer development. Here, we studied the molecular, cellular, and clinical impact of ARID1A aberrations on cancer immunity. We demonstrated that ARID1A aberrations resulted in limited chromatin accessibility to IFN-responsive genes, impaired IFN gene expression, anemic T cell tumor infiltration, poor tumor immunity, and shortened host survival in many human cancer histologies and in murine cancer models. Impaired IFN signaling was associated with poor immunotherapy response. Mechanistically, ARID1A interacted with EZH2 via its carboxyl terminal and antagonized EZH2-mediated IFN responsiveness. Thus, the interaction between ARID1A and EZH2 defines cancer IFN responsiveness and immune evasion. Our work indicates that cancer epigenetic driver mutations can shape cancer immune phenotype and immunotherapy.

Impact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups

BACKGROUND

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified four prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: copy-number-low/p53-wild-type (p53wt), POLE-mutated/ultramutated (POLEmt), microsatellite-instability/hypermutated (MSI), and copy-number-high/p53-mutated (p53mt). However, it is still unclear if they may be integrated with the current histopathological prognostic factors, such as histotype.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching 7 electronic databases from their inception to April 2019 for studies assessing prognosis in all TCGA subgroups of endometrial carcinoma. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was calculated in two different groups ("all-histotypes" and "endometrioid"), using p53wt subgroup as reference standard; HR for non-endometrioid histotypes was calculated indirectly. Disease-specific survival and progression-free survival were assessed as additional analyses.

RESULTS

Six studies with 2818 patients were included. In the p53mt subgroup, pooled HRs for OS were 4.322 (all-histotypes), 2.505 (endometrioid), and 4.937 (non-endometrioid). In the MSI subgroup, pooled HRs were 1.965 (all-histotypes), 1.287 (endometrioid), and 6.361 (non-endometrioid). In the POLEmt subgroup, pooled HRs were 0.763 (all-histotypes), 0.481 (endometrioid), and 2.634 (non-endometrioid). Results of additional analyses were consistent for all subgroups except for non-endometrioid POLEmt carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Histotype of endometrial carcinoma shows a crucial prognostic value independently of the TCGA molecular subgroup, with non-endometrioid carcinomas having a worse prognosis in each TCGA subgroup. Histotype should be integrated with molecular characterization for the risk stratification of patients in the future.

Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma

Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours ('POLE-ultramutated') within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier requires systematic evaluation of the pathogenicity of POLE mutations. To address this, we examined base changes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) status, POLE variant frequency, and the results from six in silico tools on 82 ECs with whole-exome sequencing from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Of these, 41 had one of five known pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) and showed characteristic genomic alterations: C>A substitution > 20%, T>G substitutions > 4%, C>G substitutions < 0.6%, indels < 5%, TMB > 100 mut/Mb. A scoring system to assess these alterations (POLE-score) was developed; based on their scores, 7/18 (39%) additional tumours with EDM were classified as POLE-ultramutated ECs, and the six POLE mutations present in these tumours were considered pathogenic. Only 1/23 (4%) tumours with non-EDM showed these genomic alterations, indicating that a large majority of mutations outside the exonuclease domain are not pathogenic. The infrequent combination of MSI-H with POLE EDM led us to investigate the clinical significance of this association. Tumours with pathogenic POLE EDM co-existent with MSI-H showed genomic alterations characteristic of POLE-ultramutated ECs. In a pooled analysis of 3361 ECs, 13 ECs with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/MSI-H and a pathogenic POLE EDM had a 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 92.3%, comparable to previously reported POLE-ultramutated ECs. Additionally, 14 cases with non-pathogenic POLE EDM and MMRd/MSI-H had a 5-year RFS of 76.2%, similar to MMRd/MSI-H, POLE wild-type ECs, suggesting that these should be categorised as MMRd, rather than POLE-ultramutated ECs for prognostication. This work provides guidance on classification of ECs with POLE mutations, facilitating implementation of POLE testing in routine clinical care. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

TCGA Molecular Subgroups in Endometrial Undifferentiated/Dedifferentiated Carcinoma

We aimed to classify undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma (UDC/DDC) according to the four TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer: microsatellite-instable/hypermutated (MSI), POLE-mutant/ultramutated (POLE), copy-number-low/p53-wild-type (p53wt), and copy-number-high/p53-abnormal (p53abn), through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from January 2013 to July 2019 for studies assessing the TCGA classification in endometrial UDC/DDC series. Pooled prevalence of each TCGA subgroup on the total UDC/DDCs was calculated. Three studies with 73 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of the TCGA subgroups were: 12.4% for the POLE subgroup, 44% for the MSI subgroup, 18.6% for the p53abn subgroup, 25% for the p53wt group. All TCGA groups are represented in UDC/DDC, with a predominance of the MSI group, indicating a biological heterogeneity. Hypermutated/ultramutated cancers constitute the majority of UDC/DDC, suggesting a crucial difference with other high-risk histologies of endometrial carcinoma.

Germline POLE mutation in a child with hypermutated medulloblastoma and features of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency

Ultra-hypermutation (>100 mutations/Mb) is rare in childhood cancer genomes and has been primarily reported in patients with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) caused by biallelic germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. We report a 5-yr-old child with classic clinical features of CMMRD and an ultra-hypermutated medulloblastoma with retained MMR protein expression and absence of germline MMR mutations. Mutational signature analysis of tumor panel sequencing data revealed a canonical DNA polymerase-deficiency-associated signature, prompting further genetic testing that uncovered a germline POLE p.A456P missense variant, which has previously been reported as a recurrent somatic driver mutation in cancers. This represents the earliest known onset of malignancy in a patient with a germline mutation in the POLE proofreading polymerase. The clinical features in this child, virtually indistinguishable from those of CMMRD, suggest that polymerase-proofreading deficiency should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CMMRD patients with retained MMR function.

[Un- and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma : A rare entity with a wide range of differential diagnosis]

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (ECs) are composed of undifferentiated EC and a FIGO grade 1 or 2 endometrioid carcinoma. The undifferentiated component represents a malignant epithelial neoplasm with no obvious differentiation and immunohistochemical loss of PAX8, E‑cadherin and focal expression of EMA and/or CK18 and the predominant presence of nuclear staining for INI1 (SMARCB1) and BRG1 (SMARCA4). The main differential diagnoses include poorly differentiated endometrioid EC, neuroendocrine carcinoma, lymphoma, plasmocytoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUS), carcinosarcomas, and metastases to the endometrium. The histogenesis is not yet fully understood and molecular data are still limited. Some tumors represent a loss of MHL1 and PMS2 staining due to MLH1-promotor methylation. Rare cases are associated with Lynch syndrome or POLE mutation. The un- or dedifferentiated EC represents a high-grade endometrial carcinoma that requires extended surgery and indicates a poor prognosis. In cases with mismatch repair protein deficiency or POLE mutation, immuno-oncological treatment with checkpoint inhibitors are a therapeutic option.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database analysis of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated endometrioid endometrial carcinoma of the uterus is a rare, highly aggressive, and under-recognized subtype of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates survival, prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes associated with undifferentiated endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with undifferentiated endometrial cancer who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment. Patients with all other histologic subtypes or incomplete treatment data were excluded. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. Points for each prognostic factor were assigned from regression coefficients in the final multivariable model and summed for a total score. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to determine cut-offs in the score to identify unique prognostic groups.

RESULTS

Among 349 404 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2004 to 2013, 3994 (1.1%) met the criteria for diagnosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer and 3486 had survival data. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57-74) and 58% of patients had early stage disease. Median interval from diagnosis to surgery was 3.7 weeks (IQR 2.0-5.7). Five year overall survival was 57% (standard error (SE) 1%). Stage was the strongest predictor of survival, with a 15-20% decrement in 5 year survival for each advance in stage. Stage, age, race, and presence of comorbidities were independent predictors of survival and were used to categorize patients into five prognostic groups. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival across most disease stages and prognostic groups. Multimodal adjuvant therapy was superior to unimodal treatment particularly in advanced stage unfavorable and very unfavorable groups.

CONCLUSION

In women with undifferentiated endometrial cancer, survival is primarily driven by stage. Despite the poor overall prognosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer, multimodal adjuvant therapy is a key component of treatment.

Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma Could be A Target for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (Anti PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies)

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DDEC) is defined as an undifferentiated carcinoma admixed with differentiated endometrioid carcinoma (Grade 1 or 2). It has poor prognosis compared with Grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma and is often associated with the loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, which is seen in microsatellite instability (MSI)-type endometrial cancer. Recent studies have shown that the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is related to MMR deficiency; therefore, we analyzed the immunophenotype (MMR deficient and expression of PD-L1) of 17 DDEC cases. In the undifferentiated component, nine cases (53%) were deficient in MMR proteins and nine cases (53%) expressed PD-L1. PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with MMR deficiency (p = 0.026). In addition, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+) was significantly associated with MMR deficiency (p = 0.026). In contrast, none of the cases showed PD-L1 expression in the well-differentiated component. Our results show that DDEC could be a target for immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies), especially in the undifferentiated component. As a treatment strategy for DDEC, conventional paclitaxel plus carboplatin and cisplatin plus doxorubicin therapies are effective for those with the well-differentiated component. However, by using immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with other conventional treatments, it may be possible to control the undifferentiated component and improve prognosis.

Issues in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Low-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma, Including Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists

This article provides practical recommendations developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma Project to address 4 issues that may arise in the diagnosis of uterine corpus low-grade endometrioid carcinoma: (1) The distinction between atypical hyperplasia and low-grade endometrioid carcinoma. (2) The distinction between low-grade endometrioid carcinoma and serous carcinoma. (3) The distinction between corded and hyalinized or spindle cell variants of low-grade endometrioid carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. (4) The diagnostic criteria for mixed endometrial carcinomas, a rare entity that should be diagnosed only after exclusion of a spectrum of tumors including morphologic variants of endometrioid carcinoma, dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and endometrial carcinomas with ambiguous morphology.