Autoimmune Pancreatitis Type 2: Diagnostic Utility of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Biopsy interpretation and differential diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified into type 1 (IgG4-related) and type 2 (IgG4-unrelated) and the interpretation of pancreatic biopsy findings plays a crucial role in their diagnosis. Needle biopsy of type 1 AIP in the acute or subacute phase shows a diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, and the infiltration of many IgG4-positive plasma cells. In a later phase, changes become less inflammatory and more fibrotic, making interpretations more challenging. Confirmation of the lack of 'negative' findings that are unlikely to occur in type 1 AIP (e.g., neutrophilic infiltration, abscess) is important to avoid an overdiagnosis. The number of IgG4-positive plasma cells increases to >10 cells/high-power field (hpf), and the IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio exceeds 40 %. However, these are minimal criteria and typical cases show >30 positive cells/hpf and a ratio >70 % even in biopsy specimens. Therefore, cases with a borderline increase in this number or ratio need to be diagnosed with caution. In cases of ductal adenocarcinoma, the upstream pancreas rarely shows type 1 AIP-like changes; however, the ratio of IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cells is typically <40 %. Although the identification of a granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) is crucial for type 2 AIP, this finding needs to be interpreted in conjunction with a background dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. An isolated neutrophilic duct injury can occur in peritumoral or obstructive pancreatitis. Drug-induced pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease often mimics type 2 AIP clinically and pathologically. IL-8 and PD-L1 are potential ancillary immunohistochemical markers for type 2 AIP, requiring validation studies.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

Autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis): A comprehensive review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon fibro-inflammatory disorder precipitated by autoimmune/inflammatory reactions. Currently, there are two clinical subtypes of AIP (type 1 [AIP-1] and type 2 [AIP-2]) that correspond to two histologic descriptors (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis, respectively). While our understanding of AIP-1 has evolved considerably over the years, little is known about AIP-2 due to its rarity, often leading to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and even unnecessary surgical resection. Compared to AIP-1, AIP-2 exhibits distinct clinical and histologic features. Because AIP-2 is a pancreas-restricted disease without a specific serum marker, the evaluation of histologic features (e.g., granulocytic epithelial lesions) is essential for an accurate diagnosis. Patients with AIP-2 respond well to glucocorticoids, with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies as a promising alternative therapy. The prognosis of AIP-2 is generally favorable and relapse is uncommon. Here, we provide an overview of our current knowledge on the clinical features, diagnosis, therapeutic regimens, prognosis, and putative mechanisms underlying AIP-2. Notably, the diagnostic differentiation between AIP-2, especially the mass-forming/focal type, and pancreatic cancer is important, but challenging. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsy has a key role, but novel diagnostic markers and modalities are clearly needed.

Thoracoabdominal manifestations of immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) comprises a group of immune-mediated diseases that, until recently, were considered separate entities. These entities have a similar clinical presentation, serological findings, and pathogenesis, so they are currently considered a single multisystemic disease. The common characteristic is the infiltration of involved tissues by plasma cells and lymphocytes that are positive for IgG4. Three major criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of IgG4-RD: clinical, laboratory, and histological. The pancreas is the organ that is most affected by IgG4-RD, which can simulate a tumor. In this respect, a series of signs could help us suspect that the pancreatic findings do not reflect a tumor (halo sign, duct-penetrating sign, absence of vascular invasion, etc.). The differential diagnosis is important to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.

Pancreatic adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background and Aim

The inhibition of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) has been a target for multiple drugs to enhance the T-cell antitumor activity. However, these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) come with a panel of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that include mainly endocrine, skin, and gastrointestinal effects. We report seven cases of pancreatic irAEs in patients treated with ICIs at our institute.

Methods

This is a case series; data was collected through chart review by 3 different data collectors and was analyzed separately by 2 physicians.

Results

Of these seven cases, two had diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), while five had pancreatitis diagnosed by a substantial rise in serum lipase. Pancreatitis was asymptomatic in two cases. A pancreatic biopsy in one case revealed type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. The ICIs used included pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. Treatment included steroids and holding the ICI therapy: three cases had complete resolution of pancreatitis while two cases required either a prolonged taper or a second course of prednisone for recurrence of pancreatitis. On the other hand, the DKA cases were treated with withdrawal of the ICI and starting insulin with no steroid therapy.

Conclusions

Pancreatitis and DKA are rare adverse events of ICIs that can be controlled by holding the ICI with or without starting steroids. Rechallenging the patient with the same ICI is possible in selected cases.

Revisiting the cytologic features of autoimmune pancreatitis: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a known mimicker of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma both clinically and radiologically. In this study, the authors present their institutional experience in diagnosing AIP on cytology and correlate results with the histologic findings.

METHODS

A 14-year computerized search for patients who had histologically confirmed AIP with concurrent or prior cytology was performed. Clinical data, cytology findings, and surgical pathology results were reviewed for analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were identified. The patients showed a male predominance, with a mean age of 59 years. Jaundice, weight loss, and abdominal pain were the most common clinical presentation. Five of 12 patients who were tested for serum immunoglobulin G4 had elevated levels. Cytologic findings of 16 cases that were available for review showed markedly inflamed fibrous stroma (54%) and cytologic atypia (50%). The final cytologic diagnoses were suspicious for adenocarcinoma (n = 1), atypical (n = 8), and benign/negative (n = 9). The corresponding surgical pathology diagnoses were classified as type 1 (n = 10), type 2 (n = 6), and AIP, not otherwise specified (n = 2). All type 2 AIP cases had at least atypical cytologic diagnoses, with one called suspicious for adenocarcinoma and another called adenocarcinoma at the time of rapid on-site evaluation. In contrast, eight of 10 type 1 AIP cases were negative/benign, and two of 10 were atypical. In these two atypical cases, the possibility of AIP was raised because of the presence of inflamed stroma.

CONCLUSION

AIP is a pitfall in cytology because moderate-to-marked atypia can be present, especially in type 2 AIP. Because atypia can be severe, the presence of cellular fibrous stroma with lymphocytic stromal infiltrates and the integration of serum immunoglobulin G4 levels could be helpful in avoiding diagnostic overcall in AIP.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease. The diagnosis of AIP is difficult and should be made by a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological findings. Two different types of AIP have been identified: autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 (AIP-1), which is considered a pancreatic manifestation of multiorgan disease related to IgG4, and autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (AIP-2), which is considered a pancreas-specific disease not related to IgG4. Although the pathophysiological conditions seem to differ between type 1 and type 2 pancreatitis, both respond well to steroid medications. In this review, we focused on the pathogenesis of the disease to develop a tool that could facilitate diagnosis and lead to the discovery of new therapeutic strategies to combat autoimmune pancreatitis and its relapses. The standard therapy for AIP is oral administration of corticosteroids. Rituximab (RTX) has also been proposed for induction of remission and maintenance therapy in relapsing AIP-1. In selected patients, immunomodulators such as azathioprine are used to maintain remission. The strength of this review, compared with previous studies, is that it focuses on the clear difference between the two types of autoimmune pancreatitis with a clearly delineated and separate pathogenesis. In addition, the review also considers various therapeutic options, including biologic drugs, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, a well-tolerated and effective second-line therapy for AIP type 2 relapses or steroid dependence. Other biologic therapies are also being explored that could provide a useful therapeutic alternative to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which are poorly tolerated due to significant side effects.

Histological features of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis with a correlation with imaging findings

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is characterized by a tumefactive inflammatory lesion resembling pancreatic carcinoma. Type 1 AIP is a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease characterized by unique histological features that can be identified on imaging. The capsule-like rim, which is a collar of hypertrophic lesion surrounding the pancreas, consists of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and fibrosis, and storiform fibrosis is often identified. Hypertrophic lesions of various microscopic architectures such as the ducts, veins (obliterative phlebitis), arteries (periarteritis), and nerves are observed without parenchymal damage. The pancreatic lobules keep their contours, but the acinar cells are diminished and replaced by numerous inflammatory cells. These features provide clues to arrive at a diagnosis of type 1 AIP and to distinguish it from pancreatic carcinoma on imaging. In contrast, type 2 AIP is an epithelium-centered inflammation involving the ducts and lobules. Neutrophilic infiltration in the epithelium and/or lumens (granulocytic epithelial lesion) is a characteristic finding. Lobular swelling due to inflammation is the cause of pancreatic enlargement. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is histologically similar to the hypertrophic ductal lesion in type 1 AIP and characterized by wall thickening due to inflammation and luminal stenosis. The epithelium is intact, which is different from bile duct carcinomas and primary sclerosing cholangitis, the latter of which is characterized by inflammation targeting the epithelium. Although the histological features of type 1 AIP and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis are unique, the biopsy diagnosis of these diseases has limitations, which should be recognized by clinicians.

Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Consensus and Controversies

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has attracted much attention in the last two decades, and due to the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), the number of cases diagnosed in clinical practice has markedly increased. However, in contrast to prototypic IgG4-related type 1 AIP, a minor subtype of AIP, referred to as type 2 AIP, is less widely known and has thus not yet been characterized in detail. Type 2 AIP is unrelated to IgG4 and is a completely distinct entity from type 1 AIP. One confusing factor is that the two types of AIP share patterns of clinical presentation (e.g., acute pancreatitis and painless jaundice) and imaging abnormalities (e.g., diffuse or segmental enlargement). Since there are currently no established serum markers, the diagnosis of type 2 AIP is highly challenging and requires the tissue confirmation of neutrophilic injury to the pancreatic ducts, a finding designated as a granulocytic epithelial lesion. Approximately one-third of cases are associated with inflammatory bowel disease, particularly ulcerative colitis; however, the pathological relationship between these two conditions has not yet been clarified. Unanswered questions relate to its pathophysiology, the potential development of a similar granulocytic injury in other organs, and the characteristics of pediatric cases. This review summarizes consensus and controversies surrounding type 2 AIP, with the aim of increasing awareness and highlighting the unmet needs of this underrecognized condition.

The Kynurenine Pathway-New Linkage between Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Autoimmune Endocrinopathies

The kynurenine pathway (KP) is highly regulated in the immune system, where it promotes immunosuppression in response to infection or inflammation. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), the main enzyme of KP, has a broad spectrum of activity on immune cells regulation, controlling the balance between stimulation and suppression of the immune system at sites of local inflammation, relevant to a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Various autoimmune diseases, among them endocrinopathies, have been identified to date, but despite significant progress in their diagnosis and treatment, they are still associated with significant complications, morbidity, and mortality. The precise cellular and molecular mechanisms leading to the onset and development of autoimmune disease remain poorly clarified so far. In breaking of tolerance, the cells of the innate immunity provide a decisive microenvironment that regulates immune cells' differentiation, leading to activation of adaptive immunity. The current review provided a comprehensive presentation of the known role of IDO1 and KP activation in the regulation of the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system. Significant attention has been paid to the immunoregulatory role of IDO1 in the most prevalent, organ-specific autoimmune endocrinopathies-type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and autoimmune thyroiditis.

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in PD-1 inhibitor-associated colitis and its mimics

AIMS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised the treatment of advanced malignancies by boosting immune-mediated destruction of neoplastic cells, but are associated with side effects stemming from generalised immune system activation against normal tissues. Checkpoint ligand expression in non-tumoral cells of tissues affected by immune-related adverse effects has been described in ICI-associated hypophysitis, myocarditis, and acute interstitial nephritis. We aimed to investigate the tissue expression of the immune checkpoint receptor programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), in PD-1 inhibitor-associated colitis (PD1i colitis).

METHODS AND RESULTS

PD-1 and PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression levels were analysed in 15 cases of PD1i colitis and potential mimics-infectious colitis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Increased epithelial expression of PD-L1 was observed in PD1i colitis as compared with normal colon and infectious colitis, but the expression level was lower than that in IBD. Conversely, PD-1 expression in inflammatory cells was higher in infectious colitis, intermediate in IBD, and minimal or absent in normal colon and in patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our results do not justify the use of PD-L1 as a discriminatory marker of PD1i colitis against other entities within the differential diagnosis, they support the concept that PD1i colitis and IBD have similar pathogenetic mechanisms. They also highlight the fact that PD-L1 epithelial overexpression is a commonly used mechanism of the gastrointestinal tract mucosa to protect itself from inflammatory-mediated damage resulting from different aetiologies, which probably underpins the high incidence of gastrointestinal immune-related adverse effects in patients receiving ICI therapies, in whom this mechanism is disrupted.

Sialadenitis in a patient with ulcerative colitis and autoimmune pancreatitis type 2

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a distinct form of chronic pancreatitis that has been increasingly recognised over the last decades and shows a good response to corticosteroid treatment. Two different forms of AIP have been characterized. Type 1 AIP is the pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease and often affects multiple organ systems. In contrast, type 2 AIP is confined to the pancreas and involvement of extra-pancreatic organs has previously only very rarely been reported, except for an association with inflammatory bowel disease. The hallmark lesion of type 2 AIP is the granulocyte epithelial lesion (GEL), showing infiltration of neutrophilic granulocytes in the epithelium of pancreatic ducts and their accumulation in the duct lumen. We present a 61-year-old female patient who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with a postoperative histological diagnosis of type 2 AIP. Three months later, she underwent colectomy and was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis. One year later, she presented with swelling and pain of the right-sided submandibular salivary gland which was resected. Sialadenitis with lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, obliterative phlebitis, fibrosis and frequent accumulation of neutrophilic granulocytes in ducts, reminiscent of GELs, without IgG4-positivity or epitheloid cell granulomas, was found. Later, she presented with swelling and pain related to the left-sided submandibular gland, which resolved after steroid treatment. We describe the clinical, histological and immunohistochemical findings in this patient. It may be hypothesized that the sialadenitis may represent a rare extrapancreatic manifestation of, alternatively a rare association with, type 2 AIP or ulcerative colitis.

Utility of pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 in the distinction of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Morphology plays an important role in the distinction of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, we aimed to determine the utility of immunohistochemical tumor markers to contribute in the distinction of these entities. In surgical specimens with AIP (n = 20), PDAC (n = 20) and normal pancreas (n = 20), the expression of pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 was examined. We evaluated intralobular reactive ducts / acinoductal metaplasia (ILDs) and extralobular ducts (ELDs) in AIP, neoplastic glands in PDAC, and ductal epithelium in the normal pancreas, using a five-tiered scoring system. The Ki67 hot spot index (Ki67-HSPI) was determined manually and using automated digital imaging analysis of virtual double stains of Ki67 and CK8. Besides, sequential dual-immunohistochemical staining of maspin/pVHL, maspin/IMP3 and Ki67/maspin was performed in a subset of the specimens. Strong overexpression of IMP3, maspin, S100P and Ki67 and loss of pVHL was observed in PDAC compared to AIP and normal pancreas. In AIP however, focal and weak aberrant expression was observed with the following proportions in ILDs/ELDs: pVHL in 45 %/85 %, maspin in 30 %/70 %, IMP3 in 55 %/5%, S100P in 10 %/35 % and Ki67-HSPI >20 % in 15 %/70 %. At least two markers were aberrantly expressed in ILDs/ELDs in 45 %/60 %. The aberrant expression was more pronounced in type 2 AIP compared to type 1. In conclusion, our data indicate that pVHL, maspin, IMP3, S100P and Ki67 can be focal and weak aberrantly expressed in AIP. However, when used as a panel, these markers seem to be useful for the differentiation of AIP from PC.

Use of Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Staining to Separate Sarcomatoid Malignant Mesotheliomas From Benign Mesothelial Reactions

CONTEXT.—

The separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations is a difficult morphologic problem. Some mesotheliomas stain for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1).

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine whether PD-L1 staining can separate mesotheliomas from reactive mesothelial proliferations (RMPs).

DESIGN.—

We stained 2 tissue microarrays containing in toto 62 malignant mesotheliomas and 88 RMPs, using anti-PD-L1 antibody 22C3. Staining was graded by using an immunoreactive score encompassing intensity/distribution and was divided into negative, weak, moderate, and strong. Because PD-L1 staining can be heterogeneous, we also stained 10 whole sections of sarcomatoid/desmoplastic mesotheliomas (SMMs) and 10 whole sections of spindled RMPs in the form of organizing pleuritis, the major morphologic differential of SMM. These 20 cases were not on the tissue microarrays.

RESULTS.—

RMPs showed generally negative, or occasionally weak staining in either the epithelioid or spindle cell compartments, whereas moderate to strong staining was seen in 10 of 14 SMMs but only in 6 of 48 epithelioid mesotheliomas (EMMs). The difference between SMM and RMP staining was statistically significant (P < .001), but between EMM and RMP was not significant. Whole section cases of organizing pleuritis showed no staining (N = 8) or weak staining (N = 2), whereas moderate/strong staining was seen in 9 of 10 whole sections of SMMs, a statistically significant difference (P = .02). There were no "hot spots" of RMP staining, suggesting that heterogeneous staining of RMPs is not a confounder.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Strong diffuse PD-L1 staining using antibody 22C3 supports a diagnosis of SMM when the differential diagnosis is RMPs, but PD-L1 staining is not useful for separating EMMs from RMPs.