Mycophenolate mofetil-related gastrointestinal mucosal injury: variable injury patterns, including graft-versus-host disease-like changes. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1367-1372. [PMID: 18763324 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e31816bf3fe]

Basics and Art of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is one of the most challenging areas in the medical field. Despite that, it has already been established as a standard treatment option, especially in decompensated cirrhosis and selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute liver failure. Complications due to graft rejection, including mortality and morbidity, have greatly improved over time due to better immunosuppressive agents and management protocols. Currently, immunosuppression in liver transplant patients makes use of the best possible combinations of effective agents to achieve optimal immunosuppression for long-term graft survival. Induction agents are no longer used routinely, and the aim is to provide minimal immunosuppression in the maintenance phase. Currently available immunosuppressive agents are mainly classified as biological and pharmacological agents. Though the protocols may vary among the centers and over time, the basics of effective use usually remain similar. Most protocols use the combination of multiple agents with different mechanisms of action to reduce the dose and minimize the side effects. Along with the improvement in operative and perioperative techniques, this art of immunosuppression has contributed to the recent progress made in the outcomes of liver transplants. In this review, we will discuss the various types of immunosuppressive agents currently in use, the different protocols of immunosuppression used, and the art of optimal use for achieving maximum immunosuppression without increasing toxicity. We will also discuss the practical aspects of various immunosuppression regimens, including drug monitoring, and briefly discuss the concepts of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal.

Mycophenolate-induced colitis in a patient with lupus nephritis: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug that is frequently prescribed to patients with rheumatological diseases. MMF's side effects include abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, and other gastro-intestinal side effects, which typically appear in the first few months of treatment. However, late-onset diarrhea does not rule out the presence of MMF-induced colitis, which can be misdiagnosed since it is linked to a broad range of histopathological characteristics, including alterations that resemble inflammatory bowel disease, graft-versus-host disease, and ischemia. The differences in treatment response may be explained by the complexity of the histopathologic characteristics.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we present a case of a 29-year-old Arabian female with lupus nephritis who started on MMF as induction therapy. In two months, the patient was presented to the Emergency Department with diarrhea and manifestations of severe dehydration. Infectious diseases and adverse drug events were suspected, so the patient was admitted for further workup, and MMF was stopped. The patient was diagnosed with MMF-induced colitis based on colonoscopy and histological findings. Fourteen days after stopping MMF, she was within her baseline.

CONCLUSION

The purpose of this paper is to report a case of early-onset MMF-induced colitis in a patient with lupus nephritis who had started MMF as induction therapy. A review of the available literature on this uncommon immunosuppressive effect is also presented.

Microbial bile acid metabolite ameliorates mycophenolate mofetil-induced gastrointestinal toxicity through vitamin D3 receptor

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is one of the most used immunosuppressive drugs in organ transplantation, but frequent gastrointestinal (GI) side effects through unknown mechanisms limit its clinical use. Gut microbiota and its metabolites were recently reported to play a vital role in MMF-induced GI toxicity, but the specific mechanism of how they interact with the human body is still unclear. Here, we found that secondary bile acids (BAs), as bacterial metabolites, were significantly reduced by MMF administration in the gut of mice. Microbiome data and fecal microbiota transfer model supported a microbiota-dependent effect on the reduction of secondary BAs. Supplementation of the secondary BA lithocholic acid alleviated MMF-induced weight loss, colonic inflammation, and oxidative phosphorylation damage. Genetic deletion of the vitamin D3 receptor (VDR), which serves as a primary colonic BA receptor, in colonic epithelial cells (VDRΔIEC) abolished the therapeutic effect of lithocholic acid on MMF-induced GI toxicity. Impressively, we discovered that paricalcitol, a Food and Drug Administration-approved VDR agonist that has been used in clinics for years, could effectively alleviate MMF-induced GI toxicity. Our study reveals a previously unrecognized mechanism of gut microbiota, BAs, and VDR signaling in MMF-induced GI side effects, offering potential therapeutic strategies for clinics.

Tacrolimus-Associated Terminal Ileitis After Kidney Transplantation, Mimicking Crohn Disease: A Case Report

The onset of gastroduodenal ulcers is a frequent complication after transplantation, whereas cases of intestinal ulcers are sporadic and poorly described in the literature. A patient on immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil after kidney transplant for immunoglobulin A-related glomerulonephritis developed symptoms compatible with Crohn disease 7 months after the transplant. The patient was hospitalized for abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and weight loss. Imaging and a colonoscopy showed signs of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affecting the terminal ileum. Behcet's disease, post-transplant lymphoma, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, or mycobacteria infection were excluded. Mycophenolate mofetil was suspended, and steroid therapy was increased without clinical improvement. Eleven units of blood were required for severe anemia. A further colonoscopy revealed ulcerations involving the cecal fundus, ileocecal valve, and distal ileum with bowel stenosis and suspected ischemia. The patient, therefore, underwent an emergency laparoscopic ileocolic resection. The histologic examination did not reveal clear signs of IBD, ischemia, or viral infection of the ileum. The findings seemed indicative of iatrogenic damage from immunosuppressive therapy. The postoperative course was regular, and after 12 months, the patient was asymptomatic, on low-dose tacrolimus and prednisone therapy. During immunosuppressive therapy, the onset of isolated ileal ulcers, which can mimic IBD, may be a sporadic complication.

Clinical Features of Gastroduodenal Ulcers in Kidney Transplant Patients

Objective The risk of developing peptic ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding is high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Whether or not kidney transplant patients, who are treated with multiple medications, including immunosuppressive drugs, are at an increased risk of developing peptic ulcers is unclear. Methods In this retrospective study, we compared the clinical and endoscopic features of gastroduodenal ulcers between kidney transplant patients and CKD patients. The subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between January 2015 and March 2021. Results Gastroduodenal ulcers were observed more frequently (6.5%) in kidney transplant patients than in CKD patients (2.1%) (p=0.026). Due in part to the lower median age in the kidney transplant ulcer group than in the CKD ulcer group (59 vs. 70 years old, p=0.016), the rates of atrophic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection were also lower in the kidney transplant ulcer group than in the CKD ulcer group. Significantly more kidney transplant patients were treated with acid secretion inhibitors than CKD ulcer patients (100% vs. 34.8%, p=0.0005). Peptic ulcers were observed frequently in kidney transplant patients, even though common risk factors for gastroduodenal ulcers other than immunosuppressive drugs were few. All kidney transplant patients were taking immunosuppressive medications, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone were taken more frequently than others. Conclusion Kidney transplant patients have a high risk of developing gastroduodenal ulcers. All kidney transplant patients take immunosuppressive medications, so there may be an association between immunosuppressive medications and gastroduodenal ulcer development.

The First Collective Examination of Immunosuppressive Practices Among American Intestinal Transplant Centers

Background

Unlike other solid organs, no standardized treatment algorithms exist for intestinal transplantation (ITx). We established a consortium of American ITx centers to evaluate current practices.

Methods

All American centers performing ITx during the past 3 y were invited to participate. As a consortium, we generated questions to evaluate and collect data from each institution. The data were compiled and analyzed.

Results

Ten centers participated, performing 211 ITx during the past 3 y (range, 3-46; mean 21.1). Induction regimens varied widely. Thymoglobulin was the most common, used in the plurality of patients (85/211; 40.3%), but there was no consensus regimen. Similarly, regimens for the treatment of acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and graft-versus-host disease varied significantly between centers. We also evaluated differences in maintenance immunosuppression protocols, desensitization regimens, mammalian target of rapamycin use, antimetabolite use, and posttransplantation surveillance practices. Maintenance tacrolimus levels, stoma presence, and scoping frequency were not associated with differences in rejection events. Definitive association between treatments and outcomes, including graft and patient survival, was not the intention of this initial collaboration and is prevented by the lack of patient-level data and the presence of confounders. However, we identified trends regarding rejection episodes after various induction strategies that require further investigation in our subsequent collaborations.

Conclusions

This initial collaboration reveals the extreme heterogeneity of practices among American ITx centers. Future collaboration will explore patient-level data, stratified by age and transplant type (isolated intestine versus multivisceral), to explore the association between treatment regimens and outcomes.

Drug-Associated Gastropathy: Diagnostic Criteria

Drugs are widely used to treat different diseases in modern medicine, but they are often associated with adverse events. Those located in the gastrointestinal tract are common and often mild, but they can be serious or life-threatening and determine the continuation of treatment. The stomach is often affected not only by drugs taken orally but also by those administered parenterally. Here, we review the mechanisms of damage, risk factors and specific endoscopic, histopathological and clinical features of those drugs more often involved in gastric damage, namely NSAIDs, aspirin, anticoagulants, glucocorticosteroids, anticancer drugs, oral iron preparations and proton pump inhibitors. NSAID- and aspirin-associated forms of gastric damage are widely studied and have specific features, although they are often hidden by the coexistence of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the damaging effect of anticoagulants and corticosteroids or oral iron therapy on the gastric mucosa is controversial. At the same time, the increased use of new antineoplastic drugs, such as checkpoint inhibitors, has opened up a new area of gastrointestinal damage that will be seen more frequently in the near future. We conclude that there is a need to expand and understand drug-induced gastrointestinal damage to prevent and recognize drug-associated gastropathy in a timely manner.

Mycophenolate Mofetil-Induced Colonic Injury Manifesting Endoscopically As Ischemic Colitis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMOF) is a commonly used immunosuppressive prodrug in kidney transplant patients. However, it is not without side effects. The most common of these is diarrhea which inadvertently leads to colonoscopic and endoscopic evaluation when all other workup returns negative. Colonoscopies often show diffuse ulcers and colitis changes depending on the degree of diarrhea. In rare situations, MMOF-induced ischemic colitis may occur on gross endoscopy. We describe an unusual phenomenon of an adult male status post renal transplant with histopathologically diagnosed MMOF-induced colitis who developed gross endoscopic findings concerning ischemic colitis. Our case highlights the importance of recognizing that MMOF-induced colonic changes can rarely mimic ischemic colitis. With this in mind, we aim for gastroenterologists to better understand the varying endoscopic colonic findings of this immunosuppressive drug.

[Drug induced gastro-intestinal tract lesions: A pathologist point of view]

The number of drugs available to clinicians, especially targeted therapies, grows continuously. Some drugs are known to cause frequent digestive adverse effects, which may affect the gastro-intestinal tract in a diffuse or localized manner. Some treatments may leave relatively pathognomonic deposits, but histological lesions of iatrogenic origin are mostly non-specific. The diagnostic and etiological approach is often complex because of these non-specific aspects and also because (1) a single type of drug may cause different histological lesions, (2) different drugs may cause identical histological lesions, (3) the patient may receive different drugs, and (4) drug-induced lesions may mimic other pathological entities such as inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or graft versus host disease. The diagnosis of iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract injury therefore requires close anatomic-clinical correlation. The iatrogenic origin can only be formally established if the symptomatology improves when the incriminating drug is stopped. This review aims to present the different histological patterns of gastrointestinal tract iatrogenic lesions, the potentially incriminate drugs, as well as the histological signs to look for in order to help the pathologist to distinguish an iatrogenic injury from another pathology of the gastrointestinal tract.

[Lymphocytic "…itis", from esophagus to large bowel]

Intra-epithelial lymphocytosis is an elementary lesion frequently observed in the gastrointestinal tract, which can be found from the esophagus to the colon. Many conditions of a varied nature (dysimmunitary diseases, drugs, infections…) are associated with intra-epithelial lymphocytosis, and the etiological diagnosis most often requires an anatomo-clinical correlation. The pathologist will have to identify histological lesions associated with intra-epithelial lymphocytosis allowing the diagnosis to be oriented in order to propose appropriate treatment. In this review, the main entities associated with digestive intra-epithelial lymphocytosis will be presented, detailing the key elements allowing their diagnosis.

Drug-induced digestive tract injury: decoding some invisible offenders

There is an ever-growing list of pharmacological agents, several of which are attributed to cause clinically significant gastrointestinal (GI) injury. Many patients present with significant but nonspecific symptoms, that in conjunction with the absence of relevant drug history on the requisition slip can make the histopathologic diagnosis challenging. To complicate this, although some drugs have relatively characteristic histopathologic features (such as doxycycline), there exist many other drugs that exhibit wide and varying spectra of histopathologic findings (such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or olmesartan) and have histomorphologic overlap with many other commonly encountered disease entities. This review discusses the histopathologic features of some relatively recently described drugs causing GI tract injury, namely doxycycline, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and olmesartan. We also discuss the common mimics in histopathologic differential and some pearls that can help distinguish GI tract injury induced by the aforementioned drugs from its mimics. Awareness of the wide spectra of histopathologic changes associated with these drugs is crucial for practicing pathologists, to avoid misdiagnosis and guiding the clinician for an optimal patient management, which usually involves modifying or discontinuing the offending drug. Needless to say, once a diagnosis of drug-induced injury is suspected, clinicopathologic correlation including corroboration with the drug history is of utmost importance as is the exclusion of dual pathology in these patients.

Microscopic colitis: lymphocytic colitis, collagenous colitis, and beyond

Microscopic colitis (MC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of colon with clinical presentations of chronic, watery, nonbloody diarrhea, and normal or almost normal endoscopic findings. Confirmation of a diagnosis of MC requires microscopic examination on colon biopsy to identify characteristic morphological features, in which 2 main subtypes of MC, lymphocytic colitis (LC) and collagenous colitis (CC), have been described. Although the pathogenesis of MC is still unclear, studies have revealed associations of MC with many risk factors and other diseases such as celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and medication use. Meanwhile, variants of MC, MC incomplete, or MC-like changes in other conditions are still diagnostic dilemmas for pathologists. The goal of this paper is to systemically introduce the clinicopathologic features of MC and focus on unusual features of MC and its associations with other conditions.

Immunosuppressive Drugs in Liver Transplant: An Insight

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard of care for end-stage liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Over the years, immunosuppression regimens have improved, resulting in enhanced graft and patient survival. At present, the side effects of immunosuppressive agents are a significant threat to post-LT quality of life and long-term outcome. The role of personalized immunosuppression is to reach a delicate balance between optimal immunosuppression and minimal side effects. Today, immunosuppression in LT is more of an art than a science. There are no validated markers for overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression, only a few drugs have therapeutic drug monitoring and immunosuppression regimens vary from center to center. The immunosuppressive agents are broadly classified into biological agents and pharmacological agents. Most regimens use multiple agents with different modes of action to reduce the dosage and minimize the toxicities. The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related toxicities are reduced by antibody induction or using mTOR inhibitor/antimetabolites as CNI sparing or CNI minimization strategies. Post-liver transplant immunosuppression has an intensive phase in the first three months when alloreactivity is high, followed by a maintenance phase when immunosuppression minimization protocols are implemented. Over time some patients achieve "tolerance," defined as the successful stopping of immunosuppression with good graft function and no indication of rejection. Cell-based therapy using immune cells with tolerogenic potential is the future and may permit complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive agents.

Gut inflammation induced by drugs: Can pathology help to differentiate from inflammatory bowel disease?

Drug‐induced mucosal injury (DIMI) in the gastrointestinal tract is important to recognise, partly because cessation of the culprit agent alone may result in resolution of symptoms. An ever‐growing list of medications, including newer immunotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies, can cause gastrointestinal inflammation of varying severity. However, the diagnosis of DIMI is challenging, as a single drug can induce a variety of histopathological patterns of injury including acute colitis, chronic colitis, microscopic colitis, apoptotic colopathy, and ischaemic‐type colitis. An additional consideration is the potential clinical, endoscopic and histological overlap of DIMI with gastrointestinal mucosal injury secondary to other entities such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We discuss DIMI of the gastrointestinal tract with an emphasis on histological patterns that mimic IBD, histological features which may distinguish the two entities, and the diagnostic role and limitations of the pathologist.

ECCO Topical Review on Clinicopathological Spectrum and Differential Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

Many diseases can imitate inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] clinically and pathologically. This review outlines the differential diagnosis of IBD and discusses morphological pointers and ancillary techniques that assist with the distinction between IBD and its mimics.

METHODS

European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] Topical Reviews are the result of an expert consensus. For this review, ECCO announced an open call to its members and formed three working groups [WGs] to study clinical aspects, pathological considerations, and the value of ancillary techniques. All WGs performed a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Each WG produced a draft text and drew up provisional Current Practice Position [CPP] statements that highlighted the most important conclusions. Discussions and a preliminary voting round took place, with subsequent revision of CPP statements and text and a further meeting to agree on final statements.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and pathologists encounter a wide variety of mimics of IBD, including infection, drug-induced disease, vascular disorders, diverticular disease, diversion proctocolitis, radiation damage, and immune disorders. Reliable distinction requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Histopathology of intestinal villi in neonatal and paediatric age: main features with clinical correlation - Part I

The neonatal and paediatric spectrum of small bowel disorders encompass a wide variety of conditions, ranging from food allergies to life-threatening surgical emergencies or life-long medical conditions and, as such, it comes with a whole set of diagnostic challenges for the non-paediatric pathologist. Histologic examination is a cornerstone of diagnosis in a large number of diseases and may still provide important diagnostic clues in the appropriate clinical context. In this review, divided in two sections, we aim to provide a comprehensive histopathological summary of paediatric small bowel alteration and their differential diagnoses with a reference to the main clinical aspects required for appropriate interpretation. Specifically, in this first part, we describe congenital and metabolic disorders, intestinal lymphangiectasia, immunodeficiencies, GVHD, and necrotising enterocolitis.

Review article: drug-induced small bowel injury

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced gastrointestinal injury has been increasingly reported, but its exact incidence is not known. The small and large intestines represent the most affected sites of injury, accounting for 20%-40% of all gastrointestinal side effects.

AIM

To provide an updated literature review detailing medications linked to the development of small bowel injury.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search on PubMed from its inception to May 1, 2021. We included English-language original studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, review articles and case reports.

RESULTS

Drug-induced enteropathy can range from asymptomatic histological changes resulting in a subtle, self-limited disease to a chronic inflammatory condition mimicking inflammatory bowel disease, or bowel perforation. Endoscopy can demonstrate erythema, mucosal friability, oedema, erosions, ulcers or strictures in severe cases. Histology may include mucosal erosions and ulcerations, focal active enteritis, villous atrophy, epithelial apoptosis or necrotising enteritis. A well-established association has been found with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, chemotherapeutic agents, antibiotics, immunotherapies, etanercept and olmesartan. Possible associations have been reported with other biologic agents, medications used for glycemic control, antihypertensives, cholinesterase inhibitors, potassium and iron supplements, with conflicting data regarding contraceptives/hormonal therapy and isotretinoin.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should be aware of the manifestations of drug-induced enteropathy as early recognition can lead to prompt discontinuation of the offending therapy and, therefore, a reduced risk of future complications.

Evaluation of crypt apoptotic bodies and apoptotic indices in pediatric celiac disease by routine staining and H2AX immunostaining

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated disorder with premature apoptosis occurring along the entire crypt-villous axis. H2AX is the end product of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. This is the first study to assess apoptotic body counts (ABC) by H&E and apoptotic indices (AI) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in pediatric CD. The aim of the current study was to evaluate ABC in pediatric patients with CD prior to and following institution of a gluten free diet (GFD). Sixty-three pediatric endoscopic duodenal samples were assessed and divided into three groups. A total of 21 samples from treatment naïve CD patients, 21 from the same patients after instituting a GFD, and 21 from non-celiac patients as a control group. Histopathological evaluation of ABC by H&E, and immunohistochemistry assessment of apoptotic indices (AI) by H2AX antibody were performed. The mean maximum ABC and AI were significantly higher in treatment naïve CD than in GFD and control samples. These values were also significantly higher in treatment naïve Marsh 3C (flat) than in Marsh 1, 2, 3A, and 3B (non-flat) CD cases. GFD samples with persistent flat lesions had significantly higher ABC and AI than GFD non-flat cases. ROC analysis of the mean maximum ABC and AI of treatment naïve CD cases had a statistically significant predictive potential for persistent villous atrophy at a cut-off level ⩾6.61 (P = 0.008) and ⩾105.4 (P = 0.003), respectively. Histopathological evaluation of crypt apoptotic bodies could provide predictive potential for continued villous atrophy following GFD.

The significance of focally enhanced gastritis in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

AIMS

The histological diagnosis of acute gastric graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) in patients with a history of haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is based on the presence of epithelial cell apoptosis and karyorrhectic debris. There is, however, limited information on the histological findings in patients who develop symptoms several months after transplant. Focally enhanced gastritis (FEG), defined by the presence of focal periglandular lymphohistiocytic inflammation with neutrophilic or lymphocytic intra-epithelial infiltration of gastric glands, has been described in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and in HSCT patients. The pattern closely resembles the focal periductal inflammation and lymphocytic exocytosis seen in chronic GVHD of the salivary gland. We sought to evaluate the significance of FEG in HSCT patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Gastric biopsies from 151 HSCT patients who underwent endoscopies for GVHD-like symptoms were identified. Time from transplant to biopsy, presence of extra-gastric GVHD, medications and outcome were noted. Thirty-five biopsies showed FEG and 21 showed aGVHD; the remainder were either normal or showed non-specific changes. Twenty-one (60%) FEG patients had concurrent histologically proven extra-gastric GVHD. The time to biopsy in FEG patients was significantly longer than in aGVHD patients (162 versus 57 days, P < 0.01). Prior or subsequent gastric biopsies of 14 patients in the FEG cohort were also evaluated and, of these, six showed aGVHD while one showed persistent FEG.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that FEG probably represents a form of late-occurring GVHD. This histological pattern should not be overlooked when identified in gastric biopsies from HSCT patients.

Current Prophylaxis and Treatment Approaches for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, higher event-free survival (EFS) was observed in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and grade II aGvHD vs. patients with no or grade I GvHD in the randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre Phase III For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) trial. This finding suggests that moderate-severity aGvHD is associated with a graft-versus-leukaemia effect which protects against leukaemia recurrence. In order to optimise the benefits of HSCT for leukaemia patients, reduction of non-relapse mortality-which is predominantly caused by severe GvHD-is of utmost importance. Herein, we review contemporary prophylaxis and treatment options for aGvHD in children with ALL and the key challenges of aGvHD management, focusing on maintaining the graft-versus-leukaemia effect without increasing the severity of GvHD.

Recalcitrant Esophageal Stricture Secondary to Mycophenolate Mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is associated with various gastrointestinal toxicities. However, limited literature studies exist reporting MMF-related gastrointestinal toxicity manifesting as esophageal strictures. We report a case of a 62-year-old male with kidney transplant on MMF, tacrolimus, and prednisone, presenting with progressive dysphagia and odynophagia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed severe esophageal stricturing with near food bolus impaction, requiring dilations, esophageal stent, and ultimately gastrostomy tube. Biopsies revealed nonspecific inflammation with no evidence of infectious/neoplastic process; thus, our multidisciplinary esophageal group determined that the process was secondary to MMF. This case demonstrates that, though rare, MMF can result in severe esophageal strictures causing significant morbidity.

Diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological- and retrospective assessment of histopathology-based gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in children

BACKGROUND

No previous paediatric study has evaluated the frequency of diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological assessment (CSHA) and retrospective, independent, histopathological assessment (RIHA) of gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GI-GVHD) METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, based on gastrointestinal biopsies collected from allogeneic HSCT-treated children (<18 years) with symptom-based GI-GVHD, we evaluated; disagreement of histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis in CSHA vs RIHA, and potential clinical consequences of differences between the assessments. The CSHA-based diagnoses were retrieved from histopathology reports. The RIHA was performed by one pathologist, blinded to the CSHA outcomes and based on the minimal criteria for histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis by the NIH 2014.

RESULTS

Seventy children with 92 endoscopic occasions (including 22 re-endoscopies) were enrolled. GI-GVHD was observed in 73% (67/92) of the endoscopies in the RIHA and in 54% (50/92) in the CSHA (P = .014). The RIHA confirmed 94% (47/50) with GI-GVHD and 52% (22/42) with non-GI-GVHD diagnoses, established in the CSHA. Disagreement, that is endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD solely detected in RIHA or detection of GI-GVHD in CSHA but not in RIHA, was observed in 20/42 (48%) and 3/50 (6%), respectively (McNemar's test, P = .0008). The risk of a subsequent re-endoscopy was higher in endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD detected in RIHA but not in CSHA vs if non-GI-GVHD were detected in both readings (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in children with symptom-based GI-GVHD without histopathological confirmation in CSHA, a second, NIH 2014 based histopathological assessment should be considered before performing a re-endoscopy.

Rapid resolution of colitis related to immunosuppressive medication after infliximab administration

Immunosuppression is necessary after solid organ transplantation. The non-infectious side effects associated with many of these agents are not well understood. We report a case of colitis, most resembling inflammatory bowel disease, that persisted despite withdrawal of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil and transition to alternative agents. The patient was treated for clostridium difficile without improvement. Endoscopic biopsies demonstrated non-specific inflammation without evidence of active infection. An extensive immunologic and oncologic workup was negative. Ultimately, we trialed the administration of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits TNF-alpha receptors that is commonly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. With infliximab treatment, the patient experienced rapid resolution of his disease and has remained in remission.

Sirolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in primary combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Results of a long-term prospective randomized study

The study was intended to compare pancreas graft survival rates in two groups of pancreas and kidney transplant recipients prospectively randomized to treatment either with sirolimus or MMF. From 2002 to 2013, 238 type 1 diabetic recipients with end-stage kidney disease were randomized 1:1 to sirolimus or MMF treatment. Noncensored pancreas survival at 5 years was 76.4 and 71.6% for sirolimus and MMF groups, respectively (P > .05). Death-censored pancreas survival was better in the sirolimus group (P = .037). After removal of early graft losses pancreas survival did not differ between groups (MMF 83.1% vs sirolimus 91.6%, P = .11). Nonsignificantly more grafts were lost due to rejection in the MMF group (10 vs 5; P = .19). Cumulative patient 5-year survival was 96% in the MMF group and 91% in the sirolimus group (P > .05). Five-year cumulative noncensored kidney graft survival rates did not statistically differ (85.6% in the sirolimus group and 88.8% in MMF group). Recipients treated with MMF had significantly more episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding (7 vs 0, P = .007). More recipients in the sirolimus group required corrective surgery due to incisional hernias (21 vs 12, P = .019). ClinicalTrials No.: NCT03582878.

Repeat Endoscopy Affects Patient Management in Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) of the gut is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). No guidelines exist regarding repeat endoscopy after failure of first-line treatment with steroids. We aimed to study if repeat endoscopic biopsy can be helpful in these patients to guide treatment decisions. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients who underwent repeat endoscopy for clinical suspicion of gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD after allo-HCT. Of the 318 patients, 24 underwent endoscopy twice after allo-HCT. At first endoscopy, 20 patients (80%) showed abnormal findings: 16 with GVHD alone, 1 with GVHD plus cytomegalovirus (CMV), and 3 with GVHD plus infectious colitis. On repeat endoscopy in these 20 patients with GVHD, 6 showed improvement leading to de-escalation of therapy, 8 showed worsening of GVHD including detection of CMV in 2 patients, and 2 had no histological changes. One patient with simultaneous GVHD and CMV diagnosed on first biopsy, displayed significant improvement leading to de-escalation of therapy. Three patients with GVHD along with infectious colitis on biopsy subsequently showed improvement on repeat biopsy leading to de-escalation of therapy. Among 4 patients with normal findings on first endoscopy, 3 had GVHD and 1 had epstein-barrvirus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) on repeat procedures. This study supports the usefulness of repeat endoscopy in persistently symptomatic patients when there is no improvement after the initial treatment based on the results of the first endoscopy. Repeat endoscopy may guide therapy without significant complications.

Mycophenolate-induced Colitis: A Case Report with Focused Review of Literature

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive medication used for the management of various autoimmune diseases, and patients with bone marrow and solid organ transplants. Gastrointestinal side effects are seen 45% of the time and they include nausea (29%), vomiting (23%), constipation (38%), diarrhea (50%-92%), and colitis (9%). In 98% of cases, resolution of diarrhea occurs within 20 days upon discontinuation of the MMF. Data is scarce regarding approach in the treatment of MMF-induced colitis. We report a case of MMF-induced colitis diagnosed by colonoscopy and histopathology. This case illustrates the challenges encountered while managing MMF-induced colitis.

Giant Gastric Ulcers: An Unusual Culprit

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) is routinely used immunosuppressant in solid organ transplantation is commonly associated with several gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Here we present a case of giant gastric ulcer of 5 cm from MMF use post cardiac transplant. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 56-year-old male with history of severe ischemic cardiomyopathy post heart transplant was on immunosuppression with MMF, tacrolimus and prednisone for 5 months. He presented with severe epigastric pain and intermittent episodes of melena for 1 month. His pain radiated to back that is worsened with eating. Associated with loss of appetite, vomiting and 16-pound weight loss in 3 months. He never smoked, drank alcohol or used over the counter pain medications. He was profoundly anemic requiring blood transfusions. EGD performed demonstrated very large clean-based ulcer of 5 cm diameter in the body, smaller ulcer of 8 mm diameter in pre-pyloric region and 5-10 small aphthous ulcers in the gastric body and fundus. Gastric biopsies taken from the ulcer were negative for Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus and malignancy. Flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed non-bleeding inflamed internal hemorrhoids. Consequently, MMF was discontinued and switched to azathioprine. He was treated with twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy with resolution of abdominal pain, improved appetite and weight gain. DISCUSSION: MMF is well known for common GI side-effects such as nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, ulcers, abdominal pain and rarely gastrointestinal bleeding. Few studies reported 3 to 8% incidence of ulcer perforation and GI bleeding within 6 months. Risk of gastroduodenal erosions is nearly 1.83 times for MMF, with the highest lesions associated with MMF-tacrolimus-corticosteroid combination treatment as seen in our patient. Hypothesis is that GI tract is vulnerable because of dependence of enterocytes on de novo synthesis of purines, which is disrupted by MMF. Typically, upper GI mucosal injuries of mucosal irritation leading to esophagitis, gastritis and/or ulcers are seen. Endoscopy is both diagnostic and therapeutic if bleeding gastric ulcers are noted. Minor complications improve with reduction of drug dose or use of enteric coated preparation if feasible. Discontinuation of the drug is main stay in the management of MMF related ulcer disease. Simple medical treatment with either H2-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors, coating agents, prostaglandins or combination has proven effective in most cases. Considering excellent results with medical management of ulcer, role of surgery is limited.

Celiac Disease: Updates on Pathology and Differential Diagnosis

Celiac disease is a gluten-triggered immune-mediated disorder, characterized by inflammation of the enteric mucosa following lymphocytic infiltration and eventually resulting in villous blunting. There have been many developments in refining diagnostic laboratory tests for celiac disease in the last decade. Biopsy-sparing diagnostic guidelines have been proposed and validated in a few recent prospective studies. However, despite these developments, histologic evaluation of duodenal mucosa remains one of the most essential diagnostic tools as it helps in the diagnosis of celiac disease in individuals who do not fulfill the biopsy-sparing diagnostic criteria and in those not responding to a gluten-free diet. Histologic evaluation also allows for the assessment of mucosal recovery after treatment and in the identification of concurrent intestinal diseases. Therefore, pathologists should be familiar with the histologic spectrum of celiac disease and need to be aware of other disorders with similar symptoms and histopathology that may mimic celiac disease. This review aims to provide pathologists with updates on celiac laboratory testing, biopsy-sparing diagnostic criteria, histopathology, complications, and differential diagnoses of celiac disease.

Review of Drug-induced Injury in Mucosal Biopsies From the Tubular Gastrointestinal Tract

The use of prescription and over-the-counter medications is on the rise in the US population, especially among those aged 65 and over, with over 46% of the population taking at least 1 prescription medication. Given the frequency of medication use, and that the majority of these medications are taken orally, it has become increasingly relevant for pathologist examining endoscopically obtained gastrointestinal tract mucosal biopsies to consider and recognize patterns of mucosal injury associated with various drugs. Reports on injuries associated with certain classes of drugs can be scattered among different sources, making a comprehensive view of various injury patterns and the drugs known to cause them difficult to obtain. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the drugs known to cause mucosal injuries in the tubular gastrointestinal tract organized by the organ involved and the prominent pattern of injury.

Pathology of Gastrointestinal and Liver Complications of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

CONTEXT.—

Despite advances in therapeutic and preventive measures, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients remain at risk for a variety of gastrointestinal and liver complications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To detail the pathologic features of the various gastrointestinal and liver complications occurring after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relation to their clinical context. The specific complications covered include graft-versus-host disease, mycophenolate mofetil-induced injury, timeline of infections, neutropenic enterocolitis, gastrointestinal thrombotic microangiopathy, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, hepatic iron overload, and the controversy around cord colitis syndrome.

DATA SOURCES.—

The content of this article is based on pertinent peer-reviewed articles in PubMed, relevant textbooks, and on the authors' personal experiences.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The final histopathologic diagnosis requires the integration of clinical and histologic findings and the exclusion of other competing causes of injury. Review of the clinical data, including the original disease pretransplant, the type of transplant, the timing of the gastrointestinal and/or liver manifestations, the timing of the biopsy after transplant, the presence of graft-versus-host disease in other organs and sites, the list of drug regimens, and the clinical and laboratory evidence of infection, is the key to reaching the proper histologic diagnosis.

Apoptotic colopathy: a pragmatic approach to diagnosis

‘Apoptotic colopathy’ is an umbrella term signifying a pattern of injury where the gastrointestinal biopsy shows a colitic picture with apoptosis as the predominant histological feature. Although the entities within apoptotic colopathy share a common histological feature— ‘apoptosis’, there is a list of varied clinical differential diagnoses that produce this similar histological pattern of injury. These include graft-versus-host disease, drug-induced injury due to multiple drugs (in particular, mycophenolate mofetil, check point inhibitor therapy and some others), infections (particularly cytomegalovirus, adenovirus and some others), immune disorders and other miscellaneous causes. However, the management of these varied differentials is strikingly different, thus necessitating an algorithmic approach for accurate diagnosis and optimal patient management. A definitive diagnosis requires interpretation of varied histological findings in the appropriate clinical context including clinical history, drug history and laboratory findings. This review will focus on the histopathological findings of varied entities that can manifest as ‘apoptotic colopathy’ on assessment of colonic biopsies.

B Lymphocyte Chemoattractant (CXCL13) Is an Indicator of Acute Gastrointestinal GVHD in Murine Model

Gastrointestinal acute graft-vs.-host disease (GI aGVHD) remains a significant obstacle to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In addition, GI aGVHD is often clinically indistinguishable from other causes of GI dysfunction such as conditioning regimen toxicity, infections, or medications, which complicates the diagnosis. Thus, specific biomarkers are needed to help improve diagnosis and obtain a deeper understanding of the cytokine changes in GI aGVHD. An MHC-mismatched model of aGVHD was established by transplanting 1 × 10⁷ bone marrow nuclear cells and 3 × 10⁷ spleen cells from C57/Bl6 mice or from BALB/c mice into lethally irradiated BALB/c recipients. The mice in the allogeneic transplantation group were intraperitoneally treated with 20 mg kg^-1 day^-1 cyclosporin A after aGVHD developed. Five micrograms of lipopolysaccharide were administered intraperitoneally daily to syngeneic recipients at day 11 to imitate infection; the same volume of phosphate-buffered saline was administered to control mice. The mice were killed at the indicated time points. Forty molecules derived from the GI tract were screened cytokine array. The data demonstrated that the expression of B lymphocyte chemoattractant (CXCL13) was increased by ~10-, 12-, and 16-fold upon the occurrence of aGVHD compared with infection, aGVHD after treatment, and the syngeneic control group, respectively. Thus, the elevation of BLC (CXCL13) is an indicator of acute GI GVHD.

Upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease adds minimal prognostic value in isolation or with other graft-versus-host disease symptoms as currently diagnosed and treated

Upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease is reported in approximately 30% of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients developing acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently classified as Grade II in consensus criteria, upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease is often treated with systemic immunosuppression. We reviewed the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to assess the prognostic implications of upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease in isolation or with other acute graft-versus-host disease manifestations. 8567 adult recipients of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant receiving T-cell replete grafts for acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome between 2000 and 2012 were analyzed. 51% of transplants were from unrelated donors. Reported upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease incidence was 12.1%; 2.7% of recipients had isolated upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease, of whom 95% received systemic steroids. Patients with isolated upper gastrointestinal involvement had similar survival, disease-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and relapse as patients with Grades 0, I, or II acute graft-versus-host disease. Unrelated donor recipients with isolated upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease had less subsequent chronic graft-versus-host disease than those with Grades I or II disease (P=0.016 and P=0.0004, respectively). Upper gastrointestinal involvement added no significant prognostic information when present in addition to other manifestations of Grades I or II acute graft-versus-host disease. If upper gastrointestinal symptoms were reclassified as Grade 0 or I, 425 of 2083 patients (20.4%) with Grade II disease would be downgraded, potentially impacting the interpretation of clinical trial outcomes. Defining upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease as a Grade II entity, as it is currently diagnosed and treated, is not strongly supported by this analysis. The general approach to diagnosis, treatment and grading of upper gastrointestinal symptoms and their impact on subsequent acute graft-versus-host disease therapy warrants reevaluation.

Brincidofovir (CMX001) Toxicity Associated With Epithelial Apoptosis and Crypt Drop Out in a Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patient: Challenges in Distinguishing Drug Toxicity From GVHD

Brincidofovir (CMX001) is an oral agent with activity against double-strand DNA viruses undergoing clinical trials in immunocompromised patients. We report a patient clinically diagnosed with brincidofovir-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and his histologic findings. A 2-year-old boy with medulloblastoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation developed adenovirus viremia 9 days posttransplant. After initial treatment with intravenous cidofovir he was started on oral brincidofovir as part of a clinical trial. He developed hematochezia, anorexia, and emesis 11 weeks later. Sigmoid colon biopsy showed marked crypt drop out, moderate epithelial apoptosis, and lamina propria edema. The pathologic diagnosis was drug-related injury versus infection. Brincidofovir toxicity was diagnosed clinically and the drug was discontinued. His GI symptoms improved in 2 weeks with supportive care and octreotide. Brincidofovir causes GI toxicity and histologically demonstrates epithelial apoptosis and crypt injury, similar to graft versus host disease and mycophenolate mofetil toxicity.

Celiac-like Enteropathy Associated With Mycophenolate Sodium in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Although colonic injury is a well-known complication of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the involvement of the upper gastrointestinal tract is less extensively documented. We present the occurrence of celiac-like duodenopathy manifested as a severe diarrhea syndrome in 2 renal transplant recipients on enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.

Methods

The patients belong to a setting of 16 renal transplant recipients under MPA suffering from chronic diarrhea in the absence of MPA-related colitis.

Results

Both patients had a history of persistent diarrhea with significant weight loss. Colonic mucosa was unremarkable, whereas duodenal biopsies revealed celiac-like changes with increased epithelial cell apoptosis. Clinical symptoms completely resolved, and follow-up biopsies demonstrated normalization of histology after enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium withdrawal and switching to azathioprine.

Conclusions

Celiac-like enteropathy seems to represent a rare side effect of MPA-associated immunosuppressive therapy and should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of diarrhea in transplant recipients treated with MPA particularly in the absence of MPA-related colitis. As macroscopic lesions are usually missing, blind duodenal biopsies are necessary to establish the diagnosis.

Development of Duodenal Ulcers due to the Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors After the Induction of Sofosbuvir Plus Ledipasvir Therapy: A Report of Two Cases

Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir (SOF-LDV) combination therapy is a promising therapy for post-transplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection. It is known that gastric pH elevation induces lower absorption of ledipasvir; therefore, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) should be considered regarding dose reduction after SOF-LDV therapy induction. Here, we report two patients who developed duodenal ulcers due to the discontinuation of PPIs after the induction of SOF-LDV therapy for post-transplant HCV reinfection. The first patient was a 71-year-old man who had undergone living donor liver transplantation due to HCV-related liver cirrhosis. Lansoprazole, 30 mg daily, was discontinued upon SOF-LDV therapy induction. Seven days after SOF-LDV therapy induction, gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed the presence of a duodenal ulcer. The second patient was a 54-year-old man who had undergone living donor liver transplantation due to HCV-related end-stage liver disease. Similar to the first patient, rabeprazole sodium was discontinued upon the induction of SOF-LDV therapy. Eighteen days after SOF-LDV therapy induction, gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed the presence of a duodenal ulcer. In both cases, these duodenal ulcers improved after the resumption of the administration of PPIs, and a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks was achieved by SOF-LDV therapy with PPI use. Thus, PPI use should be continued consistently during SOF-LDV therapy for post-transplant HCV reinfection.

Heart transplant recipient with mycophenolate mofetil-induced colitis: the great imitator

In this article, we report a case of a 55-year-old male heart transplant recipient who presented with diarrhoea. An extensive workup for infectious diseases was negative. The patient had a colonoscopy with biopsies showing colitis that mimicked graft-versus-host disease on histopathology. After excluding other potential causes and excluding acute cellular rejection, mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued, and the patient had significant clinical improvement with increased appetite and weight gain.

Cecum perforation induced by mycophenolate mofetil after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report and review of literature

GI perforation after stem cell transplantation is extremely rare and is associated with poor prognosis. In addition, the clinical limitations of MMF are associated with GI intolerance and hematologic suppression. However, the exact mechanism whereby MMF induces changes in GI mucosa is unknown. Currently, there is no definite method to distinguish between GI toxicity associated with MMF and GVHD. It is important to recognize association between MMF and the histologic changes mimicking GVHD, given that GVHD is a significant differential diagnosis in stem cell transplant patients. MMF-induced colitis and GI perforation are extremely rare but should be considered in patients presenting with diarrhea and abdominal pain. Histology and clinical features are helpful to distinguish this condition from ischemic colitis. Early recognition of GI perforation is necessary for proper diagnosis and subsequent intervention. Emergency medical treatment and laparotomy have been shown to reduce the risk of fatal complications in patients presenting with GI symptoms suspected of GI perforation.

Choice of Endoscopic Procedure in Children With Clinically Suspected Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-host Disease

OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) is a potentially life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Symptoms indicating GI-GVHD motivates endoscopy with biopsy sampling and histopathological confirmation. Optimal extent of endoscopy in children is, however, presently unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether biopsies from the rectosigmoid area versus the rest of the colon/ileocolon with or without biopsies from simultaneous upper endoscopy, were equally reliable for detection of GI-GVHD and relevant differential diagnoses.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study based on histopathological re-evaluation of biopsies and hospital record data, collected from children with suspected GI-GVHD.

RESULTS

Forty-four children with 51 endoscopic occasions (81 procedures) were included. Thirty-nine of 51 (76.5%) were diagnosed as GI-GVHD, 14 (27.4%) received a differential diagnosis and 7 (13.7%) had normal histology findings. Comorbidity, that is, simultaneous detection of a differential diagnosis and GI-GVHD, was observed in 9 (23.1%) cases. Cytomegalovirus infection was the most frequent differential diagnosis, 6 of 7 were detected in biopsies from rectosigmoid and esophagogastroduodenal areas. Sensitivity for detection of GI-GVHD in biopsies collected from rectosigmoid-ileocolonic-, rectosigmoid-, or esophagogastroduodenal areas were 97.4%, 84.6%, 83.3%, respectively, and 97.4% when the latter 2 were merged. The difference, nondetected GI-GVHD in the rectosigmoid area versus detected elsewhere in the GI tract, was statistically significant (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsies collected from the rectosigmoid area solely were not optimal for detection of pediatric GI-GVHD. When biopsy sampling from rectosigmoid and upper GI tract areas was combined, the sensitivity for GI-GVHD was, however, equally high as for ileocolonoscopy or full upper and lower endoscopy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal and hepatic injury: pathologists' perspective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a relatively new class of 'miracle' dugs that have revolutionised the treatment and prognosis of some advanced-stage malignancies, and have increased the survival rates significantly. This class of drugs includes cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors such as ipilimumab; programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab and avelumab; and programmed cell death protein ligand-1 inhibitors such as atezolizumab. These drugs stimulate the immune system by blocking the coinhibitory receptors on the T cells and lead to antitumoural response. However, a flip side of these novel drugs is immune-related adverse events (irAEs), secondary to immune-mediated process due to disrupted self-tolerance. The irAEs in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract/liver may result in diarrhoea, colitis or hepatitis. An accurate diagnosis of CPI-induced colitis and/or hepatitis is essential for optimal patient management. As we anticipate greater use of these drugs in the future given the significant clinical response, pathologists need to be aware of the spectrum of histological findings that may be encountered in GI and/or liver biopsies received from these patients, as well as differentiate them from its histopathological mimics. This present review discusses the clinical features, detailed histopathological features, management and the differential diagnosis of the luminal GI and hepatic irAEs that may be encountered secondary to CPI therapy.

Use of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Guidelines Improves the Diagnostic Sensitivity of Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease

CONTEXT

- Graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis can be difficult and is a truly clinicopathologic endeavor.

OBJECTIVES

- To assess the diagnostic sensitivity of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease using the 2015 National Institutes of Health (NIH) histology consensus guidelines and to analyze histologic findings that support the guidelines.

DESIGN

- Patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants were identified via a retrospective search of our electronic medical records from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2011. Endoscopies with available histology were reviewed by 2 pathologists using the 2015 NIH guidelines. The clinical diagnosis was used as the gold standard. A nontransplant set of endoscopic biopsies was used as a control.

RESULTS

- Of the 250 total endoscopies, 217 (87%) had a clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Use of the NIH consensus guidelines showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 65%. Thirty-seven of 58 (64%) cases with an initial false-negative histopathologic diagnosis were diagnosed as graft-versus-host disease on our review.

CONCLUSIONS

- Use of the NIH histology consensus guidelines results in a high sensitivity and specificity, thereby decreasing false-negatives. Additionally, use of the NIH guidelines aids in creating uniformity and diagnostic clarity. Correlation with clinical and laboratory findings is critical in evaluating the differential diagnosis and to avoid false-positives. As expected, increased apoptosis with decreased inflammation was associated with a pathologic diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease and supports the NIH guidelines.

Plasma vascular non-inflammatory molecule 3 is associated with gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease in mice

Background

Gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease (GI aGVHD) is a lethal complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, it is still very difficult to make a diagnosis of GI aGVHD in practice. To date, no consensus plasma biomarker of GI aGVHD can be used to help make a diagnosis. Here, we attempted to identify GI aGVHD associated plasma proteins in murine model, which can help make a diagnosis of GI aGVHD.

Methods

We used 8-plex isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (8-plex iTRAQ) to screen out proteins in plasma samples taken from murine models before and after allogeneic HSCT. Next mRNA expressions were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in mouse intestinal epithelial samples.

Results

We found that five proteins were increased at least 2-fold in the allogeneic group at day 7 compared with days 0, 3 and 15 (after Cyclosporin A treatment) and the syngeneic group at day 7. These 5 proteins were VNN3, ZNF746, C4BP, KNG1 and FETUB, and they were consistent with results from negative labeling with 8-plex iTRAQ. Furthermore, increase in mRNA level of VNN3 was confirmed in murine intestinal epithelial samples with aGVHD.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that plasma VNN3 protein is associated with GI aGVHD in murine model.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12950-017-0178-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Celiac Disease and Other Causes of Duodenitis

CONTEXT

- Patients who receive an upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination frequently have biopsies taken from the duodenum. Accurate interpretation of duodenal biopsies is essential for patient care. Celiac disease is a common clinical concern, but pathologists need to be aware of other conditions of the duodenum that mimic celiac disease.

OBJECTIVE

- To review the normal histologic features of duodenal mucosa and describe the clinical and histologic findings in celiac disease and its mimics, listing the differentiating features of biopsies with villous atrophy and epithelial lymphocytosis.

DATA SOURCES

- The study comprises a literature review of pertinent publications as of November 30, 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

- Celiac disease is a common cause of abnormal duodenal histology. However, many of the histologic features found in the duodenal biopsy of patients with celiac disease are also present in other conditions that affect the small bowel. Diagnostic precision may be enhanced by obtaining a careful patient history and by ancillary laboratory testing, particularly for the presence of antitissue transglutaminase antibodies.

The Many Faces of Medication-Related Injury in the Gastrointestinal Tract

Every year many new medications are approved for clinical use, several of which can cause clinically significant gastrointestinal tract toxicity. This article emphasizes the histologic features and differential diagnosis of drug-induced injury to the gastrointestinal mucosa. Ultimately, clinical correlation and cessation of a drug with resolution of symptoms are needed to definitively confirm a drug as a causative factor in mucosal injury. Recognizing histologic features in gastrointestinal biopsies, however, can allow surgical pathologists to play a key role in establishing a diagnosis of drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

Practical Approach to the Flattened Duodenal Biopsy

Celiac disease features duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis with or without villous atrophy. Lymphocytosis without villous atrophy will be proven to represent celiac disease in 10% to 20% of cases. The differential diagnosis is broad: Helicobacter pylori gastritis, NSAID injury and bacterial overgrowth are considerations. Lymphocytosis with villous atrophy is very likely to be celiac disease, but there are mimics to consider, including collagenous sprue, tropical sprue, drug injury, and common variable immunodeficiency. Histologic clues to a diagnosis other than celiac disease include paucity of plasma cells, excess of neutrophils, granulomas, and relative paucity of intraepithelial lymphocytes.

Gastrointestinal tuberculosis following renal transplantation accompanied with septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a survival case presentation

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant tuberculosis (PTTB) is a serious opportunistic infection in renal graft recipients with a 30-70 fold higher incidence compared to the general population. PTTB occurs most frequently within the first years after transplantation, manifesting as pulmonary or disseminated TB. Gastrointestinal TB (GITB) is a rare and potentially lethal manifestation of PTTB and may show delayed onset in renal transplant recipients due to the use of lower doses of immunosuppressants. Further, non-specificity of symptoms and the common occurrence of GI disorders in transplant recipients may delay diagnosis of GITB.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we report a rare survival case of isolated GITB in a renal transplant recipient, occurring seven years after transplantation. The patient's condition was complicated by severe sepsis with positive blood culture Staphylococcus haemolyticus, septic shock, multiple organ failure including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute renal failure, requiring mechanical ventilation, vasopressor circulatory support and intermittent hemodialysis. Furthermore, nosocomial infections such as invasive aspergillosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurred during hospitalization. Antituberculosis therapy (rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide) was initiated upon Mycobacterium confirmation. Moreover, treatment with voriconazole due to the Aspergillus flavus and meropenem due to the Pseudomonas aeruginosa was initiated, the former necessitating discontinuation of rifampicin. After 34 days, the patient was weaned from mechanical ventilation and was discharged to the pulmonary ward, followed by complete recovery.

CONCLUSION

This case offers a guideline for the clinical management towards survival of GITB in transplant patients, complicated by septic shock and multiple organ failure, including acute renal injury and ARDS.