A reappraisal of the MECT1/MAML2 translocation in salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas

Mucin-rich salivary gland tumors

Salivary gland neoplasms characterized by abundant mucin production are rare but have long been recognized. Due to their scarcity, precise classification has long eluded these mucin-rich tumors. Recent molecular discoveries, however, have shed considerable light on the genetic underpinnings of mucin-rich salivary gland neoplasms. This manuscript will review the most up-to-date information on this fascinating group of salivary gland neoplasms.

Expanding the cytological and architectural spectrum of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: The key to solving diagnostic problems in morphological variants

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Varying sized cysts and sheets composed of three cell types (epidermoid, intermediate, and mucous cells) with varying degrees of atypia form the characteristic histological appearance of MEC. MEC frequently contains a wide variety of modified tumor cells and can be entirely cystic or completely solid. Under these circumstances, MEC requires critical differentiation from many mimickers, ranging from simple cysts and benign tumors to high-grade carcinomas. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation and sclerotic changes in the stroma also contribute to diagnostic difficulties. Several well-known diagnostically challenging variants (oncocytic, clear cell, spindle cell, and sclerosing) exist in MEC. With the advent of studies on specific CRTC1/3::MAML2 fusion genes in MEC, newly proposed subtypes have emerged, including Warthin-like and non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like MECs. In addition to the recently defined mucoacinar variant with a serous cell phenotype, MEC devoid of squamous differentiation has also been reported, implying the need to reconsider this basic concept. In this article, we outline the general clinical features and MAML2 status of conventional MEC and review the cytoarchitectural subtypes, with an emphasis on a pitfall in the interpretation of this histologically diverse single entity.

Recent Advances in Pathology of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is a malignant epithelial neoplasm characterized by biliary differentiation within the liver. ICCA is molecularly heterogeneous and exhibits a broad spectrum of histopathological features. It is a highly aggressive carcinoma with high mortality and poor survival rates. ICCAs are classified into two main subtypes: the small-duct type and large-duct types. These two tumor types have different cell origins and clinicopathological features. ICCAs are characterized by numerous molecular alterations, including mutations in KRAS, TP53, IDH1/2, ARID1A, BAP1, BRAF, SAMD4, and EGFR, and FGFR2 fusion. Two main molecular subtypes-inflammation and proliferation-have been proposed. Recent advances in high-throughput assays using next-generation sequencing have improved our understanding of ICCA pathogenesis and molecular genetics. The diagnosis of ICCA poses a significant challenge for pathologists because of its varied morphologies and phenotypes. Accurate diagnosis of ICCA is essential for effective patient management and prognostic determination. This article provides an updated overview of ICCA pathology, focusing particularly on molecular features, histological subtypes, and diagnostic approaches.

Low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma mimicking benign cystic lesions in the salivary gland: A diagnostic dilemma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a common malignancy arising in the parotid gland. The diagnosis of MEC is typically based on its morphological features alone, characteristically containing mucocytes, intermediate cells and epidermoid cells. However, when cystic degeneration is diffuse, it is challenging to distinguish MEC from other benign cystic tumors. This is a case report of a 58-year-old Caucasian man who presented with a parotid mass. H&E sections of the mass reveal multiloculated cysts lined by bland-looking epithelium with only rare papillary architectures. The papillary proliferation contains mucocytes, and epidermoid cells highlighted by the p63 immunohistochemistry study. The diagnosis was confirmed by FISH result of positive MAML2 (11q21) rearrangement. Patient underwent parotidectomy and is disease-free 6 months post-surgery. MEC with cystic degeneration is a common diagnostic pitfall which can mimic many benign lesions in the salivary gland. We present a rare case with MEC with extensive cystic change, its molecular and pathologic findings and review the diagnostic features of MEC, its benign mimickers and useful tools for distinguishing these entities.

Molecular pathology in diagnosis and prognostication of head and neck tumors

Classification of head and neck tumors has evolved in recent decades including a widespread application of molecular testing in tumors of the salivary glands, sinonasal tract, oropharynx, nasopharynx, and soft tissue. Availability of new molecular techniques allowed for the definition of multiple novel tumor types unique to head and neck sites. Moreover, the expanding spectrum of immunohistochemical markers facilitates a rapid identification of diagnostic molecular abnormalities. As such, it is currently possible for head and neck pathologists to benefit from a molecularly defined classifications, while making diagnoses that are still based largely on histopathology and immunohistochemistry. This review highlights some principal molecular alterations in head and neck neoplasms presently available to assist pathologists in the practice of diagnosis, prognostication and prediction of response to treatment.

Comprehensive Genome profile testing in head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a tumor occurring in various primary sites with limited chemotherapy options for its treatment. Recently, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing has become clinically widespread. In this study, we examined the utility of CGP in diagnosing and treating HNC.

METHODS

This study included 29 patients with HNC who underwent CGP testing at the Gifu University Hospital between December 2019 and April 2022. We analyzed the types of gene mutations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) based on the CGP results. Squamous cell carcinoma accounted for 55.2%, and other cancers accounted for 44.8%. And we investigated the correlation of prognosis with gene mutations and TMB.

RESULTS

Gene mutations were detected in TP53(48.3%), CDKN2A (27.6%), CDKN2B (17.2%), NOTCH1 (17.2%), PIK3CA (17.2%), ARID1A (13.8%), and NF1 (13.8%). TP53, CDKN2A and CDKN2B mutations significantly decreased survival rate in HNC. Five cases (17.2%) were TMB-high and 82.8% were TMB-low. In SCC cases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, TMB-high had better Overall survival than TMB-low. And all patients with TMB-high were oropharyngeal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Although there were no cases in which effective treatment was actually performed based on the results of CGP, many gene mutations have been detected and several gene mutations correlated with prognosis. Furthermore, TMB can be used as a biomarker to predict the therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cases of SCC.

Diagnosis of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma with Striking Tubular Hypereosinophilia by MYB and EWSR1 Breakapart Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

BACKGROUND

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), associated with MYB/MYBL1 gene rearrangements, shows epithelial and basaloid myoepithelial cells arranged in tubular, cribriform and solid patterns. Variations from this classic morphology make diagnosis challenging, necessitating molecular testing. AdCC with striking tubular hypereosinophilia (AdCC-STE) is one such recently described histological subtype.

METHODS

A 52-year-old female presented with a floor of mouth swelling for two months, diagnosed elsewhere as polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC). A biopsy was obtained. With a diagnosis of oncocytic neoplasm, wide excision of the tumor was undertaken. Histological examination, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and ultrastructural examination were performed. Archival cases of PAC and epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) were reviewed, and MYB immunostaining and FISH were performed to identify potential AdCC-STE cases.

RESULTS

The excised tumor from the index patient showed bilayered tubules, micropapillae and cribriform pattern. Luminal cells with hypereosinophilic to clear cytoplasm were surrounded by flattened abluminal cells. Focally, basophilic matrix was seen within sharply demarcated pseudocystic spaces. FISH revealed MYB and EWSR1 gene rearrangements, confirmatory of AdCC-STE. Electron microscopy showed features consistent with AdCC; however, mitochondria were not prominent. Among 14 archival PACs, two showed MYB immunopositivity; one showed MYB rearrangement but was classical AdCC. Among 35 EMC, one case showed MYB immunoreactivity and eosinophilia of luminal cells but lacked MYB/MYBL1 rearrangement.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of unusual histological subtypes of AdCC, such as AdCC-STE, is imperative, as it may be misdiagnosed as PAC and EMC, among others. Presence of basophilic matrix and squamoid morules in a biphasic tumor even with hypereosinophilic rather than basaloid myoepithelial appearance should raise suspicion for AdCC-STE, and prompt molecular testing for confirmation. With wider accessibility, lower cost and significantly shorter turn-around-time when compared to RNA sequencing, FISH can be employed for confirmation of diagnosis, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Critical Appraisal of Histologic Grading for Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Salivary Gland: Is an Objective Prognostic 2-tiered Grading System Possible?

Multiple 3-tiered grading systems exist for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), leading to controversial results on the frequency and prognostic values of each grade. We aimed to identify prognostic histologic factors and to evaluate grading schemes in this retrospective study of 262 resected primary head and neck MECs. The rate of nodal metastasis was 8.4%. Large tumor size, tumor fibrosis, infiltrative border, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, atypical mitosis, mitotic index (MI) ≥4/2 mm 2 (4/10 HPFs), necrosis, and pT4 stage were associated with increased risk of nodal metastasis. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95%. Significant prognostic factors for RFS included infiltrative border, tumor-associated lymphoid stroma, architectural patterns (macrocystic, microcystic, and noncystic), anaplasia, atypical mitosis, MI, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, margin, pT stage, and tumor size. Nuclear anaplasia, high mitotic rate, and ≥25% microcystic component were significant independent prognostic factors on multivariate survival analysis. There was no significant difference between low-grade (LG) and intermediate-grade (IG) MECs in terms of risk of nodal metastasis and outcomes using all 4 known grading systems. Rather, high-grade MEC was consistently associated with an increased risk of nodal metastasis at presentation and decreased RFS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) compared with the LG/IG MECs. We therefore recommend simplifying MEC grading to a 2-tiered grading scheme using MI and/or tumor necrosis. Using a 2-tiered grading, high-grade histology independently predict RFS, and is associated with a 25% risk of nodal metastasis, a 5-year RFS of 76%, and a 5-year DMFS of 76%, whereas LG MEC has a nodal metastasis rate of 7.0%, 5-year RFS of 97% and 5-year DMFS of 99%.

Genetic and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Mammary Hidradenoma and Comparison to Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is exceedingly rare in the breast, with <45 cases reported in the literature. Although estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor 2 triple-negative, MEC is characterized as a special subtype of breast carcinoma with significantly better prognosis than conventional basal-type tumors. Cutaneous hidradenoma (HA) is considered a benign adnexal neoplasm showing histomorphologic overlap with MEC. Rare cases of HA have also been reported in the breast, but these are relatively uncharacterized. In this study, we examined the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), and genetic features of 8 breast HAs, in comparison to 3 mammary MECs. All cases were positive for MAML2 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eight cases demonstrated a CRTC1::MAML2 fusion, and one MEC harbored a CRTC3::MAML2 fusion; the latter is a novel finding in the breast. Mutational burden was very low, with only one HA exhibiting a MAP3K1 pathogenic alteration. By IHC, both MEC and HA demonstrated cell type-dependent expression of high- and low-molecular-weight keratins and p63, as well as negative to low-positive estrogen receptor and androgen receptor. Smooth muscle myosin and calponin highlighted an in situ component in the 3 cases of MEC; expression of these myoepithelial markers was negative in HAs. Additional distinguishing characteristics included the growth pattern and tumor architecture, the presence of glandular/luminal cells in HA, and overall higher IHC expression of SOX10, S100 protein, MUC4, and mammaglobin in MEC. Morphologic findings were also compared to a series of 27 cutaneous nonmammary HAs. Mucinous and glandular/luminal cells were identified in significantly more mammary HAs than nonmammary lesions. The findings provide insight into the pathogenesis of MAML2-rearranged neoplasms of the breast, underscore the overlapping genetic features of MEC and HA, and highlight similarities to their extramammary counterparts.

Role of Histone Deacetylases in the Pathogenesis of Salivary Gland Tumors and Therapeutic Targeting Options

Salivary gland tumors (SGTs) comprise a rare and heterogenous category of benign/malignant neoplasms with progressively increasing knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underpinning their pathogenesis, poor prognosis, and therapeutic treatment efficacy. Emerging data are pointing toward an interplay of genetic and epigenetic factors contributing to their heterogeneity and diverse clinical phenotypes. Post-translational histone modifications such as histone acetylation/deacetylation have been shown to actively participate in the pathobiology of SGTs, further suggesting that histone deacetylating factors (HDACs), selective or pan-HDAC inhibitors (HDACis), might present effective treatment options for these neoplasms. Herein, we describe the molecular and epigenetic mechanisms underlying the pathology of the different types of SGTs, focusing on histone acetylation/deacetylation effects on gene expression as well as the progress of HDACis in SGT therapy and the current status of relevant clinical trials.

NKX3.1 Expression and Molecular Characterization of Secretory Myoepithelial Carcinoma (SMCA): Advancing the Case for a Salivary Mucous Acinar Phenotype

BACKGROUND

Secretory myoepithelial carcinomas (SMCA) are rare, mucinous, signet ring predominant tumors with primitive myoepithelial features. While many mucinous salivary gland tumors have now been molecularly characterized, key drivers in SMCA have yet to be elucidated. Recently, NKX3.1, a homeodomain transcription factor implicated in salivary mucous acinar development was also shown in a subset of salivary mucinous neoplasms, salivary intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (SG-IPMN). To date, NKX3.1 expression has not been characterized in other mucinous salivary lesions. Here, we report molecular and extended immunophenotypic findings in SMCA and NKX3.1 expression in the context of other head and neck lesions.

METHODS

We retrieved 4 previously reported SMCA, performed additional immunohistochemical and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). We also investigated the use of NKX3.1 as a marker for SMCA in the context of its prevalence and extent (using H-score) in a mixed cohort of retrospectively and prospectively tested head and neck lesions (n = 223) and non-neoplastic tissues (n = 66).

RESULTS

NKX3.1 positivity was confirmed in normal mucous acini as well as in mucous acinar class of lesions (5/6, mean H-score: 136.7), including mucinous adenocarcinomas (3/4), SG-IPMN (1/1), and microsecretory adenocarcinoma (MSA) (1/1). All SMCA were positive. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for SS18 rearrangements were negative in all successfully tested cases (0/3). NGS was successful in two cases (cases 3 and 4). Case 3 demonstrated a PTEN c.655C>T p.Q219* mutation and a SEC16A::NOTCH1 fusion while case 4 (clinically aggressive) showed a PTEN c.1026+1G>A p.K342 splice site variant, aTP53 c.524G>A p.R175H mutation and a higher tumor mutation burden (29 per Mb). PTEN immunohistochemical loss was confirmed in both cases and a subset of tumor cells showed strong (extreme) staining for P53 in Case 4.

CONCLUSION

Despite a partial myoepithelial phenotype, SMCA, along with mucinous adenocarcinomas/SG-IPMN and MSA, provisionally constitute a mucous acinar class of tumors based on morphology and NKX3.1 expression. Like salivary mucinous adenocarcinomas/SG-IPMN, SMCA also show alterations of the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway and may show progressive molecular alterations. We document the first extramammary tumor with a SEC16A::NOTCH1 fusion.

Sinonasal Adenosquamous Carcinoma - Morphology and Genetic Drivers Including Low- and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus mRNA, DEK::AFF2 Fusion, and MAML2 Rearrangement

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal adenosquamous carcinoma is rare, and there are almost no studies detailing morphology or characterizing their genetic driver events. Further, many authors have termed sinonasal tumors with combined squamous carcinoma and glands as mucoepidermoid carcinoma but none have analyzed for the presence of MAML2 rearrangement.

METHODS

Cases from 2014 to 2020 were collected and diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria. They were tested for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry (70% cut-off), DEK::AFF2 fusion by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and AFF2 immunohistochemistry, MAML2 rearrangement by FISH, and low- and high-risk HPV by RNA ISH and reverse transcription PCR, respectively. Detailed morphology and clinical features were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 7 male (64%) and 4 female (36%) patients with a median age of 69 years, most Caucasian (10 of 11 or 91%). Most had tobacco exposure (8/11, 73%) and most presented with epistaxis, a visible nasal mass, and/or facial pain. Several had a precursor papillomas (3 of 11, 27%). The squamous component had variable keratinization, 5 of 11 (46%) of which would be described as keratinizing, 3 non-keratinizing, and 2 with mixed features. All had gland formation, by definition, and 2 of 11 (18%) had ciliated tumor cells. None of the 11 cases had MAML2 rearrangement and one had DEK::AFF2 fusion with associated positive nuclear AFF2 protein immunostaining. Most were p16 positive (7 of 11, 64%) and all 7 of these were hrHPV positive either by RNA ISH or RT-PCR. Two of the p16-negative tumors were positive for lrHPV by RNA ISH. Treatment included surgery alone (4 of 11, 36%), surgery with adjuvant radiation (5 of 11, 45%), and surgery with radiation and chemotherapy (2 of 11, 18%). Four of 11 patients (36%) suffered disease recurrence, two requiring re-operation and who were disease free at last follow-up, one receiving additional chemotherapy and who was alive with disease. The other elected to undergo palliative therapy and died of disease.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal adenosquamous carcinoma is a somewhat heterogeneous tumor not infrequently arising ex papilloma and having various drivers including high- and low-risk HPV and rarely DEK::AFF2 fusion. The prognosis appears favorable when proper treatment is possible.

Glandular Odontogenic Cyst: a Case Report and Literature Review

Background

The glandular odontogenic cyst is now a well-known entity comprising < 0.5% of all odontogenic cysts with a recent review tabulating about 200 cases in the English literature. Glandular odontogenic cyst shows epithelial features that simulate salivary gland or glandular differentiation. The importance of glandular odontogenic cyst relates to the fact that it has a high recurrence rate and shares overlapping histologic features with central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The purpose of this paper is to describe the clinical, radiological, and histopathological features of a case of glandular odontogenic cyst with the course of treatment and 9-years follow-up, followed by a review of the literature.

Methods

A 63-year-old male was referred for further investigation of a mandibular radiolucency observed by his general dental practitioner. The main complaint was a murmuring sensation in the lower jaw right side. Radiological examination revealed a well-defined, unilocular, radiolucent lesion, involving the right mandible with 17 and 68 mm in mediolaterally and anteroposterior dimension, respectively.

Results

A total enucleation of the cystic lesion and surgical extraction of tooth #46, #47 and #48, was performed under local anaesthesia. Histopathologic examination revealed a glandular odontogenic cyst.

Conclusions

Glandular odontogenic cyst shows no pathognomonic clinico-radiographic characteristics, and therefore in many cases it resembles a wide spectrum of lesions. Diagnosis can be extremely difficult due to histopathological similarities with dentigerous cyst, lateral periodontal cyst and central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Therefore a careful histopathological examination and a long-term follow-up (preferably seven years) are required to rule out recurrences.

Top 10 Nested Pattern Head and Neck Lesions to Notice

BACKGROUND

Nested is defined as "cellular clusters arranged in small groupings with intervening vascular or stromal networks, lacking lumens or glandular formation." Using this definition, multiple neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the head and neck come into the differential. We have broadly organized the differential diagnosis of "nested" tumors into entities with neuroendocrine differentiation, squamous differentiation, thyroid follicular cell differentiation, and other lesions.

METHODS

Review.

RESULTS

Many different entities have a nested appearance and the morphologic, immunohistochemical, clinical, and radiographic features contribute to the differential diagnosis. The different tumors covered in this review include neuroendocrine neoplasms, paraganglioma, middle ear neuroendocrine tumor (formerly known as middle ear adenoma), medullary thyroid carcinoma, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, ectopic pituitary neuroendocrine tumor, hyalinizing trabecular tumor, solid subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma, solid cell nests/C-cell hyperplasia, necrotizing sialometaplasia, and meningioma.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we discuss the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of the covered entities as a guide to differential diagnosis when nested-patterned head and neck lesions are encountered.

Clinicopathological practice in the differential diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma from neoplasms with mucinous component

Background

The differential diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) from neoplasm undergoing mucinous features brings more pitfalls to pathologists. Combining specific MAML2 gene rearrangement and histological characteristics may be the solution.

Methods

Twenty-five tumors with mucinous components were selected for differential diagnosis of MEC. All the cases were detected for MAML2 gene rearrangement. The cases diagnosed as MEC were classified into four variants: classic, oncocytic, Warthin-like, and nonclassified, and they were graded using the Brandwein system. The histological characteristics of non-MECs were summarized for differential diagnosis. Univariate survival analysis was performed on MECs.

Results

There were 16 MECs; 62.5% were MAML2 rearranged. For the low-, intermediate-, and high-grade MECs, the rate of rearrangement was 83.3%, 100%, and 28.6%, respectively. Both the oncocytic and Warthin-like MECs were MAML2 rearranged. For the classic and nonclassified MECs without MAML2 rearrangement, non-keratinized squamoid cells and distinctive mucinous cells were essential diagnostic criteria. On survival analysis, all the disease progression occurred in high-grade MECs (p = 0.038). Nine cases were diagnosed as non-MECs: pleomorphic adenoma with mucinous metaplasia showed no ex-capsular involvement; metaplastic Warthin tumor appeared with overt keratinization and residual oncocytic bilayered epithelium; mix squamous cell and glandular papilloma showed an endobronchial papillary growing pattern; adenosquamous carcinoma was accompanied by squamous carcinoma in situ of the overlying mucosa. All the non-MECs were negative for MAML2 rearrangement.

Conclusion

The application of combining MAML2 rearrangement and histological characteristics is helpful in the differential diagnosis between MEC and other tumors with mucinous components.

Molecular Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis in Pediatric Airways Tumors

Primary tumors of the airways in the pediatric population are very rare entities. For this reason, little is known about the pathogenesis of these neoplasms. Understanding the biology has different practical implications: for example, it could help in the differential diagnosis, have a prognostic significance, or may lead to the development of a targeted therapy. The aim of this article is to present the current knowledge about pediatric airways tumors, focusing on the molecular mechanisms that cause the onset and progression of these neoplasms. After a brief introduction of epidemiology and clinical presentation, the tumorigenesis of the most frequent pediatric airways tumors will be described: Juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (JORRP), Subglottic Hemangiona (SH), Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), and Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC).

Establishment of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Cell Lines from Surgical and Recurrence Biopsy Specimens

Patients with advanced/recurrent mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to establish and characterize human mucoepidermoid carcinoma cell lines from the initial surgical specimen and biopsy specimen upon recurrence from the same patient to provide a resource for MEC research. MEC specimens from the initial surgical procedure and biopsy upon recurrence were used to establish cell lines. The established cell lines were cytogenetically characterized using multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization and detection, and the sequence of the CRTC1-MAML2 chimeric gene was determined. Furthermore, the susceptibility of head and neck mucoepidermoid carcinoma to standard treatment drugs such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab was investigated. We successfully established unique MEC cell lines, AMU-MEC1, from an initial surgical specimen and AMU-MEC1-R1 and AMU-MEC1-R2 from the recurrent biopsy specimen in the same patient. These cell lines exhibited epithelial morphology and developed in vitro-like cobblestones. They shared eight chromosomal abnormalities, including der(19)ins(19;11)(p13;?), which resulted in a chimeric CRTC1-MAML2 gene, indicating the same origin of the cell lines. The susceptibility of all cell lines to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was low. Interestingly, EGFR dependency for cell growth decreased in AMU-MEC-R1 and AMU-MEC-R2 but was retained in AMU-MEC1. These cytogenetic and biochemical findings suggest that the established cell lines can be used to investigate the disease progression mechanisms and develop novel therapeutics for MEC.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be devoid of squamoid cells by immunohistochemistry: expanding the histologic and immunohistochemical spectrum of MAML2- rearranged salivary gland tumours

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is historically defined by a mix of squamoid, intermediate, and mucous cells, but we have recently encountered several cases lacking immunoreactivity for squamous markers p40, p63, and CK5/6 despite MAML2 fusions. This study will characterise these unique tumours. Ten MEC were collected arising from the parotid gland (n = 4), submandibular gland (n = 2), nasopharynx (n = 1), base of tongue (n = 1), bronchus (n = 1), and trachea (n = 1). Six tumours were low-grade, two intermediate-grade, one high-grade, and one demonstrated low-grade areas with high-grade transformation. Four cases were oncocytic, four had clear-cell features, two had spindle cell features, and one high-grade MEC had prominent solid, cord-like, and micropapillary features. The tumours were negative for p40 (10/10), p63 (10/10), and CK5/6 (9/9). Targeted RNA sequencing demonstrated CRTC1::MAML2 in five cases, CRTC3::MAML2 in two, and a novel MAML2::CEP126 in the unusual high-grade case. In two cases with insufficient RNA, MAML2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) showed rearrangement. Genetically-confirmed MEC may lack overt squamous differentiation by histology and immunohistochemistry. While most cases harboured canonical fusions and fit within the spectra of MEC variants with oncocytic, clear cell, and/or spindle cell features, one had a novel MAML2::CEP126 fusion and unusual morphology. In MEC without squamoid cells, the use of immunohistochemistry may hinder, rather than aid, the correct diagnosis. In such cases, MAML2 analysis is most useful. The historical definition of MEC as a carcinoma with squamoid, intermediate and mucous cells should be revisited.

MAML2-Rearranged Primary Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Mandible as an Incidental Finding: A Case Report and Review of the Literature of Molecularly Confirmed Cases

This report presents an extremely rare case of MAML2-rearranged primary central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the mandible that was discovered as an incidental finding. Our review of the literature identified 36 cases of MAML2-rearranged intraosseous lesions of the jaw (30 central MECs, 5 odontogenic cysts with mucous prosoplasia, and 1 glandular odontogenic cyst). Given the therapeutic indications for a diagnosis of MEC (a malignant neoplasm), MAML2 rearrangement should be confirmed in suspected cases of central MEC.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus with MAML2 gene rearrangement: Case report and literature review

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common salivary gland malignancy but rarely occurs in the esophagus. It is easily confused with adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with mucus-secreting components. MAML2 gene rearrangement detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR or next-generation sequencing (NGS) can aid in the diagnosis. We present a case of esophageal MEC with MAML2 gene rearrangement detected by FISH. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an esophageal MEC with MAML2 gene rearrangement. We also reveal that esophageal MEC patients were reported to have a higher risk of recurrence and death than SCC patients in previous literature. However, all the cases were diagnosed using previous diagnostic criteria and not confirmed by MAML2 gene rearrangement detection, and most of them might not be true MECs.

p53 Inhibits Bmi-1-driven Self-Renewal and Defines Salivary Gland Cancer Stemness

PURPOSE

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a poorly understood salivary gland malignancy with limited therapeutic options. Cancer stem cells (CSC) are considered drivers of cancer progression by mediating tumor recurrence and metastasis. We have shown that clinically relevant small molecule inhibitors of MDM2-p53 interaction activate p53 signaling and reduce the fraction of CSC in MEC. Here we examined the functional role of p53 in the plasticity and self-renewal of MEC CSC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using gene silencing and therapeutic activation of p53, we analyzed the cell-cycle profiles and apoptosis levels of CSCs in MEC cell lines (UM-HMC-1, -3A, -3B) via flow cytometry and looked at the effects on survival/self-renewal of the CSCs through sphere assays. We evaluated the effect of p53 on tumor development (N = 51) and disease recurrence (N = 17) using in vivo subcutaneous and orthotopic murine models of MEC. Recurrence was followed for 250 days after tumor resection.

RESULTS

Although p53 activation does not induce MEC CSC apoptosis, it reduces stemness properties such as self-renewal by regulating Bmi-1 expression and driving CSC towards differentiation. In contrast, downregulation of p53 causes expansion of the CSC population while promoting tumor growth. Remarkably, therapeutic activation of p53 prevented CSC-mediated tumor recurrence in preclinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these results demonstrate that p53 defines the stemness of MEC and suggest that therapeutic activation of p53 might have clinical utility in patients with salivary gland MEC.

MAML2 Gene Rearrangement Occurs in Nearly All Hidradenomas: A Reappraisal in a Series of 20 Cases

ABSTRACT

Hidradenoma is a benign cutaneous adnexal neoplasm that occurs across a wide age range and at a variety of anatomic sites. Its most characteristic morphologic feature is the presence of diverse cell types including squamoid, clear, plasmacytoid, and mucinous cells. Hidradenoma is morphologically and molecularly similar to mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and both tumors are characterized by recurrent CRTC1-MAML2 cytogenetic translocations. Previous studies have suggested that approximately half of hidradenomas possess this translocation. This finding raised the question of whether translocation-negative hidradenomas might have an alternate molecular basis. Here, we sought to reevaluate the frequency of MAML2 translocation in hidradenoma in a series of 20 cases. We find that 90% show evidence of MAML2 translocation, suggesting that this genetic event is a nearly invariant feature of hidradenoma. These results inform our molecular understanding of this tumor and may be useful in challenging cases to distinguish hidradenoma from its histologic mimics.

Molecular testing of cytology specimens: overview of assay selection with focus on lung, salivary gland, and thyroid testing

Ancillary and molecular testing of cytopathology specimens has emerged as a reliable and useful tool to provide diagnostic information and treatment-related biomarker status for the management of cancer patients. The cytology specimens obtained through minimally invasive means have proven suitable testing substrates for a variety of ancillary tests, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, as well as polymerase chain reaction and next generation sequencing molecular techniques. By focusing specifically on the cytology specimen, this review provides an overview of basic testing considerations and assay selection in addition to updates on the ancillary testing of cytologic tumor specimens from the lung, salivary gland, and thyroid.

MAML2 negative oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of submandibular gland

Background

Oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Only a few cases are reported involving mostly the parotid gland with only four cases reported in the submandibular gland. Mastermind-like 2 (MAML2) translocation is detected in about 66% mucoepidermoid carcinoma and many oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Case presentation

We present a rare case of MAML2 negative oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the submandibular gland in a 73-year-old female. CT revealed a large left submandibular gland mass. Submandibular gland resection with marginal mandibulectomy and ipsilateral neck dissection was performed. Grossly, a solid-cystic submandibular gland tumor was identified. Microscopic examination revealed an infiltrative proliferation of oncocytes. Foci of squamoid and intermediate cells with rare mucocytes were present. Two ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes and mandible were involved. Immunohistochemistry and special stains demonstrated positivity for p63, p40, CK5/6, mucicarmine and alcian blue. No MAML2 gene rearrangement was identified.

Conclusion

An awareness that MAML2 negative mucoepidermoid carcinoma exists will prevent misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment as many of its differential diagnoses are benign.

Clear Cell Neoplasms of Salivary Glands: A Diagnostic Challenge

This review focuses on the heterogenous group of clear cell neoplasms of salivary glands and attempts to identify major differential diagnostic features. Within the head and neck region, clear cells are found most commonly in salivary gland tumors, but may also be seen in tumors of squamous or odontogenic epithelial origin, primary or metastatic carcinomas, benign or malignant melanocytic lesions, or benign or malignant mesenchymal tumors. Clear cells occur fairly commonly among a wide variety of salivary gland neoplasms, but mostly they constitute only a minor component of the tumor cell population. Clear cells represent a major diagnostic feature in two salivary gland neoplasms, epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma. In addition, salivary gland neoplasms composed predominantly of clear cells could also include clear cell variants of other salivary neoplasms, such as mucoepidermoid carcinoma and myoepithelial carcinoma, but their tumor type-specific histologic features may only be available in limited nonclear cell areas of the tumor. Diagnosing predominantly clear cell salivary gland tumors is difficult because the immunoprofiles and morphologic features may overlap and the same tumor entity may also have a wide range of other histologic presentations. Many salivary gland tumors are characterized by tumor type-specific genomic alterations, particularly gene fusions of the ETV6 gene in secretory carcinoma, the MYB and MYBL1 genes in adenoid cystic carcinoma, the MAML2 gene in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, the EWSR1 gene in hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma, and others. Thus, along with conventional histopathologic examination and immunoprofiling, molecular and genetic tests may be important in the diagnosis of salivary gland clear cell tumors by demonstrating genetic alterations specific to them.

Primary Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Apparatus

PURPOSE

In this study, we evaluated the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of lacrimal apparatus mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) to define its typical diagnostic features.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Institutional pathology records between 2011 and 2021 were searched for all cases of lacrimal apparatus MEC.

RESULTS

A total of 2 male and 6 female patients ranging in age from 18 to 83 years (median 56, mean 54) were included. Six lacrimal apparatus MECs were found in the lacrimal gland, and 2 cases occurred in the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. Histologically, there were 6 cases of conventional MEC, 1 clear-cell variant of MEC, and 1 oncocytic variant of MEC for a total of 8 cases. There were 3 low-grade cases and 5 high-grade cases. All 8 cases were evaluated via immunohistochemistry, and the results were positive (scores 1-4) for pankeratin, 34betaE12, p63, p40, CK7, CK8, and CK19, with a relatively higher expression of p63 observed in high-grade MEC. The presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 6 DNA was found in 4 patients. MAML2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was positive for MAML2 rearrangement in 3 lacrimal gland tumors (2 low-grade and 1 high-grade). Six tumors were managed with radical resection, and 2 patients underwent orbital exenteration. Postoperative radiation therapy was delivered to 6 patients, and chemotherapy was administered to 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

MECs of the lacrimal apparatus are rare tumors, and the rate of MAML2 translocations is lower than that in salivary MECs. Lacrimal gland and lacrimal sac MECs may not be of the same subtypes intrinsically because of the difference in MAML2 translocation, anatomy, and clinical course. The etiologic function of HPV type 6 infection should be explored in lacrimal apparatus MECs. Radical surgery is the treatment of choice. The description of these unique findings may assist in the definitive diagnosis of and improve our understanding of lacrimal apparatus MEC.

Presentation and outcomes of patients with clinically T1-2, N0 parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma: The roles of elective neck dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy

Objectives

Examine the role of elective neck dissection (END) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in early‐stage clinically N0 parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC).

Methods

The study is a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database, 2004–2016. The study population included adult patients with MEC who underwent parotidectomy.

Results

A total of 1233 patients were included. Histopathology demonstrated well, moderately, and poorly differentiated MEC 47.12%, 39.98%, and 12.90% of the time, respectively. END was performed in 78.67% of patients, resulting in nodal upstaging in 4.43% and identification of extracapsular extension (ECE) in 0.72%. RT was utilized in 67.33% of patients with advanced pathological features. Neither END nor RT improved overall survival separately (p < 0.05) or combined (adjusted HR: 1.19, 95%CI: 0.52, 2.70, p = 0.68).

Conclusion

This study provides an epidemiological perspective regarding patients with clinically T1‐2, N0 MEC. There was no observed survival advantage with END and RT.

Sinonasal mixed transitional epithelial-seromucinous papillary glandular neoplasms with BRAF p.V600E mutations - sinonasal analogues to the sialadenoma papilliferum family tumors

Sinonasal non-intestinal type adenocarcinoma (non-ITAC) is a heterogeneous category that may benefit from improved taxonomy. With the recognition that most non-ITAC are phenotypically seromucinous, stratification may be improved by applying salivary type morphologic criteria and molecular findings. We report two cases of papillary seromucinous adenocarcinoma with sinonasal papilloma-like surface components that show histologic and molecular features analogous to the salivary sialadenoma papilliferum family of tumors. Case 1 concerns a 50-year-old female who presented with a left anterior nasoethmoid polyp, while case 2 is that of a 74 year old female with nasal polyposis. Histologically, both cases demonstrated a surface transitional sinonasal papilloma-like component (more prominent in case 2) with a deeper bilayered glandular component showing papillary and tufted micropapillary growth of monomorphic columnar to cuboidal cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm. Case 1 also showed a deep cribriform/microcystic component. Immunostains showed a delimiting p63/p40 positive basal layer around the SOX-10 positive glandular elements, while the transitional sinonasal papilloma-like components were diffusely p63/p40 positive. Like sialadenoma papilliferum and related tumors, both cases demonstrated BRAF p.V600E mutations in both components and no other alterations. The patients remain disease free at 9 and 19 months respectively. Our cases illustrate a novel sinonasal lesion and suggest that improved morphologic and molecular categorization may refine and reduce the category of non-ITAC.

Diagnostic Value of MAML2 Rearrangements in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is often seen in salivary glands and can harbor MAML2 translocations (MAML2+). The translocation status has diagnostic utility as an objective confirmation of the MEC diagnosis, for example, when distinction from the more aggressive adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is not straightforward. To assess the diagnostic relevance of MAML2, we examined our 5-year experience in prospective testing of 8106 solid tumors using RNA-seq panel testing in combinations with a two-round Delphi-based scenario survey. The prevalence of MAML2+ across all tumors was 0.28% (n = 23/8106) and the majority of MAML2+ cases were found in head and neck tumors (78.3%), where the overall prevalence was 5.9% (n = 18/307). The sensitivity of MAML2 for MEC was 60% and most cases (80%) were submitted for diagnostic confirmation; in 24% of cases, the MAML2 results changed the working diagnosis. An independent survey of 15 experts showed relative importance indexes of 0.8 and 0.65 for "confirmatory MAML2 testing" in suspected MEC and ASC, respectively. Real-world evidence confirmed that the added value of MAML2 is a composite of an imperfect confirmation test for MEC and a highly specific exclusion tool for the diagnosis of ASC. Real-world evidence can help move a rare molecular-genetic biomarker from an emerging tool to the clinic.

MAML2-Rearranged Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland: A Report in a 20-Month-Old Toddler

Malignancies of salivary gland origin are rare in children. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common histologic type of salivary gland neoplasm in pediatrics. We report a rare case of parotid MEC in a 20-month-old female patient. The tumor was composed of nests of epidermoid cells with nuclei appearing vesicular, pleomorphic, and hyperchromatic with an admixture of mucous cells and cystic spaces within a prominent connective tissue stroma. Immunohistochemically, the epidermoid cells showed cytokeratin 7 and P63 positivity, and mucous cells were positive for mucicarmine. Molecularly, this case was positive for MAML2 rearrangement by FISH. To our knowledge, this is one of the youngest cases of MEC of the parotid gland reported in the English literature.

miR-22 and miR-205 Drive Tumor Aggressiveness of Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas of Salivary Glands

Objectives

To integrate mRNA and miRNA expression profiles of mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MECs) and normal salivary gland (NSGs) tissue samples and identify potential drivers.

Material and Methods

Gene and miRNA expression arrays were performed in 35 MECs and six NSGs.

Results

We found 46 differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs and 3,162 DE mRNAs. Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the DE transcripts revealed two clusters in both miRNA and mRNA profiles, which distinguished MEC from NSG samples. The integrative miRNA-mRNA analysis revealed a network comprising 696 negatively correlated interactions (44 miRNAs and 444 mRNAs) involving cell signaling, cell cycle, and cancer-related pathways. Increased expression levels of miR-205-5p and miR-224-5p and decreased expression levels of miR-139-3p, miR-145-3p, miR-148a-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-338-3p, miR-363-3p, and miR-4324 were significantly related to worse overall survival in MEC patients. Two overexpressed miRNAs in MEC (miR-22 and miR-205) were selected for inhibition by the CRISPR-Cas9 method. Cell viability, migration, and invasion assays were performed using an intermediate grade MEC cell line. Knockout of miR-205 reduced cell viability and enhanced ZEB2 expression, while miR-22 knockout reduced cell migration and invasion and enhanced ESR1 expression. Our results indicate a distinct transcriptomic profile of MEC compared to NSG, and the integrative analysis highlighted miRNA-mRNA interactions involving cancer-related pathways, including PTEN and PI3K/AKT.

Conclusion

The in vitro functional studies revealed that miR-22 and miR-205 deficiencies reduced the viability, migration, and invasion of the MEC cells suggesting they are potential oncogenic drivers in MEC.

Warthin-Like Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Morphological Spectrum - A Report of 3 Cases with Histological and Cytological Findings and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) showing Warthin's tumor (WT)-like features is a low-grade malignancy which should be differentiated from WT. Morphological features may be distinctly different in each case, causing diagnostic difficulties.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three cases were presented and discussed with their morphologies. All cases that presented with a mass in the parotid gland went to parotidectomy, and all had preoperative fine-needle aspirations (FNAs). Case 1 was a 16-year-old female; FNA was suggestive of WT and initially interpreted as WT histologically. Case 2 was a 27-year-old male; FNA was interpreted as noninformative due to the presence of cyst fluid only. Case 3 was a 53-year-old male and cytologically was found to be suspicious for MEC which contained squamous and goblet cells on a mucoid background. On histopathological examination, case 2 and case 3 were morphologically consistent with low-grade MEC with WT-like features. Prominent lymphoid stroma and the cystic pattern were the characters of these tumors. Case 1 had the classical WT appearance with some mucinous and squamous metaplasia which could only be interpreted as MEC after the detection of MAML2 rearrangement by FISH. The other 2 showed either focal or relatively diffuse usual low-grade MEC findings, and case 3 was also confirmed by MAML2 rearrangement.

CONCLUSION

Cytological and histopathological features revealed a spectrum. Differentiating WT-like MECs from ordinary WTs may be challenging. On the one end of the spectrum, they may look very much like WT, and on the other end, even though usual MEC features are present, still, WT-like appearance may pose diagnostic difficulty. Showing MAML2 rearrangement in these cases is very helpful. The presence of mucinous and squamous cells in an otherwise WT-like looking tumor should be alarming for MEC, and if possible, each case should be analyzed for MAML2 rearrangement.

Establishment of a patient‑derived mucoepidermoid carcinoma cell line with the CRTC1‑MAML2 fusion gene

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant tumor of the major and minor salivary glands. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment and there is no effective post-operative therapy for MEC. The present study reports an Institutional Review Board-approved case of a 45-year-old Japanese female diagnosed with low-grade MEC in the hard palate. Radical resection, supraomohyoid neck dissection and antero-lateral thigh flap reconstruction was performed. A MEC cell line was then established from the resected tumor tissue. Short tandem repeat profiling confirmed the origin and authenticity of the cell line, that harbors a CRTC1-MAML2 translocation, which is frequently observed in MEC. Amphiregulin (AREG), identified as one of the targets of the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion gene, was expressed in the cell line. The AREG receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was also highly phosphorylated. The results predicted that AREG-EGFR signaling, which is required for tumor growth and survival, might be activated in the cell line in a cell-autonomous manner. As AREG expression is associated with EGFR-targeted drug resistance, this cell line might assist with the identification of novel strategies for MEC treatment.

Recent Advances on Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Biology for the Diagnosis of Adnexal Sweat Gland Tumors

Simple Summary

Cutaneous sweat gland tumors form an extremely diverse and heterogeneous group of neoplasms that show histological differentiation to the sweat apparatus. Due to their rarity, wide diagnostic range, and significant morphological overlap between entities, their accurate diagnosis remains challenging for pathologists. Until recently, little was known about the molecular pathogenesis of adnexal tumors. Recent findings have revealed a wide range of gene fusions and other oncogenic factors that can be used for diagnostic purposes and, for some, can be detected by immunohistochemistry. Among other organs containing exocrine glands, such as salivary glands, breasts, and bronchi, most of these biomarkers have been reported in homologous neoplasms that share morphological features with their cutaneous counterparts. This review aims to describe these recent molecular and immunohistochemical biomarkers in the field of sweat gland tumors.

Abstract

Cutaneous sweat gland tumors are a subset of adnexal neoplasms that derive or differentiate into the sweat apparatus. Their great diversity, rarity, and complex terminology make their pathological diagnosis challenging. Recent findings have revealed a wide spectrum of oncogenic drivers, several of which are of diagnostic interest for pathologists. Most of these molecular alterations are represented by gene fusions, which are shared with other homologous neoplasms occurring in organs containing exocrine glands, such as salivary and breast glands, which show similarities to the sweat apparatus. This review aims to provide a synthesis of the most recent immunohistochemical and molecular markers used for the diagnosis of sweat gland tumors and to highlight their relationship with similar tumors in other organs. It will cover adenoid cystic carcinoma (NFIB, MYB, and MYBL1 fusion), cutaneous mixed tumor (PLAG1 fusion), cylindroma and spiradenoma and their carcinomas thereof (NF-κB activation through CYLD inactivation or ALKP1 hotspot mutation), hidradenoma and hidradenocarcinoma (MAML2 fusion), myoepithelioma (EWSR1 and FUS fusion), poroma and porocarcinoma (YAP1, MAML2, and NUTM1 fusion), secretory carcinoma (ETV6, NTRK3 fusion), tubular adenoma and syringo-cystadenoma papilliferum (HRAS and BRAF activating mutations). Sweat gland tumors for which there are no known molecular abnormalities will also be briefly discussed, as well as potential future developments.

Fusion-Positive Salivary Gland Carcinomas

Salivary gland tumors are a rare, heterogeneous group of neoplasms that pose significant diagnostic challenges for the histopathologist. Histopathological diagnosis relies primarily on morphological assessment, with ancillary special stains and immunohistochemistry. In recent years, new defining genomic alterations have been characterized in these tumors. In particular, they include gene fusions which have shown to be tightly tumor-type specific, and thus valuable for use in diagnostically challenging cases. These discoveries also help in refining tumor classification. Furthermore, such genetic alterations may have prognostic as well as potentially therapeutic implications in the era of personalized medicine. This review aims at providing a summary of the most recent updates in this field.

A Case Report of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma With Extensive Keratinization in Parotid: Expanding the Morphologic Spectrum

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant tumor of salivary glands in children and young adults. Typically, it is composed of squamoid, mucin-producing and intermediate-types cells. However, overt keratinization is rare. To the best of our knowledge, extensive keratinization or keratin pearls in MEC has never been reported. Keratinization or keratin pearls are regard "practically never seen in low-grade MEC". Herein, we report a case of a 34-year-old woman who presented with a tumor in right parotid gland for 2 months. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of extensive squamous cells with overt keratin pearls, intermediate cells and few scattered mucous cells. MAML2 gene break-apart and CRTC1-MAML2 gene fusion were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. This is the first report to describe a MEC case with extensive squamous metaplasia and overt keratin pearls formation, which expands the morphologic spectrum of MEC.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Evaluating the prognostic impact of primary tumor site

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is one of the most common salivary gland malignancies. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of primary tumor site in patients with MEC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cohort identified 308 patients with MEC who underwent primary surgery between 1985 and 2015. Survival outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios for primary site were determined using the Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty (58%) patients were diagnosed with minor and 128 (42%) with major salivary gland cancer. Primary site in the minor salivary gland group included 137 (44%) oral cavity, 38 (12%) pharynx, 3 (0.9%) nasal cavity, and 2 (0.6%) trachea and larynx. The major salivary gland group included 118 (38%) parotid, 8 (3%) submandibular, and 2 (0.6%) sublingual. With a median follow-up of 73 months, 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 84% and 91%, respectively. Patients with tumors located in the hard palate and retromolar trigone had the best survival, while patients with tumors located in the paranasal sinuses and submandibular gland had the poorest survival. After controlling for tumor grade and stage, MEC primary site was not predictive of survival or recurrence. On multivariate analysis, worse DSS was associated with stage III-IV tumors (HR: 7,11; 95% CI: 1.19-26.43; p = 0.0034) and high-grade tumors (HR: 19.12; 95% CI: 2.26-162.77; p = 0.0068).

CONCLUSIONS

While high grade and advanced overall stage were found to be independent predictors of worse survival, primary tumor site was not predictive of poor outcome.

Salivary Gland Cancers

Salivary gland carcinomas are a rare and heterogenous group of cancers with varying underlying biology and clinical behavior. A quickly evolving body of data has advanced the understanding of these tumors, leading to effective therapeutics for several histologic subtypes. Biologically rational clinical trials have developed from an understanding of MYB and NOTCH signaling in adenoid cystic carcinoma. The recognition of androgen receptor signaling and HER2-targeted therapy has offered therapeutic options in non-ACC salivary cancers. The use of TRK inhibitors in salivary secretory carcinoma has led to exceptional responses. Immunotherapy is an exciting new therapeutic avenue that requires further exploration.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck: CRTC1/3 MAML 2 translocation and its prognosticators

PURPOSE

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the head and neck is a prevalent malignant salivary gland tumour with a reported good outcome. The aim of this study was to report the outcome in our centre.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis with survival analyses was performed combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis to assess CRTC1/3 MAML 2 fusion gene presence.

RESULTS

Sixty-four cases of MEC were identified. Median age at presentation was 51.4 years with a predominance for parotid gland involvement. Five, 10- and 20- year disease-free survival was 98%, 90% and 68%, respectively. Overall survival was 94%, 90% and 64%, respectively. Local recurrence was seen up to 14 years after primary diagnosis; distant metastases were diagnosed up to 17 years later. The overall recurrence rate was less than 20 per cent. CRTC1/3 MAML 2 fusion gene presence showed no survival benefit.

CONCLUSION

MEC of the head and neck has a favorable outcome with the exception of high-grade MEC. PNI and nodal involvement are not rare. CRTC1/3 MAML 2 fusion gene presence showed no survival benefit. The tendency for late onset of loco-regional and distant recurrence should not be underestimated.

The Decline of Salivary Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified as a Tumor Entity: Reclassification Using Contemporary Immunohistochemical Profiling and Diagnostic Criteria

The classification of salivary gland carcinomas has become increasingly specific over the last decade with the definition of new tumor types, documentation of novel molecular and immunohistochemical findings, and development of more refined diagnostic criteria. In this setting, it is unclear how many salivary tumors still cannot be easily categorized-and whether such tumors represent undifferentiated malignancies or include additional definable entities. Relying largely on current classification schemes and contemporary immunohistochemical panels, we reassessed salivary tumors previously diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (ACA NOS) from 2 large academic medical centers. Fifty-seven ACA NOS (72%) could be reclassified as more specific entities including 31 salivary duct carcinomas (39%), 7 polymorphous adenocarcinomas (9%), 5 epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas (6%), 4 myoepithelial carcinomas (5%), 4 secretory carcinomas (5%), 1 acinic cell carcinoma (1%), 1 basal cell adenocarcinoma (1%), 1 intraductal carcinoma (1%), and 1 clear cell carcinoma (1%) as well as 2 metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (3%). Of reclassified cases, 21 (37%) represented variant histologies within these categories. ACA NOS comprised 11% of salivary malignancies before reclassification, but only 4% after reclassification. The remaining 22 ACA NOS demonstrated heterogeneous features, with an association between histologic grade and clinical outcome. In effect, ACA NOS is becoming a bygone entity as modern classification schemes and ancillary techniques now permit more specific typing of a majority of these tumors, potentially facilitating more specific prognostication and treatment. Additional distinctive entities such as mucinous adenocarcinoma may still be definable within the ACA NOS category.

Mucoacinar Carcinoma: A Rare Variant of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is generally characterized by an admixture of mucous, epidermoid and intermediate type cells. Numerous variants morphologies are described and defined by stromal and/or cytoplasmic tinctorial characteristics. We now report 11 cases of MEC with serous acinar differentiation, reflecting a distal intercalated duct/acinar phenotype, which we designate as mucoacinar carcinomas. Seven patients were female while 4 were male with a mean age of 55 years (range: 21 to 72 y). Ten cases were from the parotid while 1 was from the submandibular gland. Mean size of the tumors was 1.8 cm (range: 0.7 to 4.5 cm). Three cases were low grade, 7 were intermediate grade, and 1 was high grade. Low to intermediate grade cases demonstrated prominent clear to vacuolated cells with focal serous acinar differentiation. The high-grade case showed a distinctive scattering of acinar cells interspersed between epidermoid cells. Periodic acid Schiff after diastase (9/9), SOX-10 (9/9), and DOG-1 (9/10) highlighted the acinar component. Six of 7 cases showed a focal acinar predominant NR4A3 expression. MAML2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was positive in all cases, in both acinar and mucoepidermoid components. Two cases tested by next generation sequencing showed standard CRTC1-MAML2 fusions. MSANTD3 and NR4A3 fluorescence in situ hybridization on the other hand were negative. Evidence thus suggests that mucoacinar carcinoma represents an acinar variant morphology in MEC, rather than a true MEC-acinic cell carcinoma hybrid, or collision tumor. The acinar differentiation, SOX-10, DOG-1, and even focal NR4A3 reactivity may thus be diagnostic pitfalls.

Targeted RNA sequencing in the routine clinical detection of fusion genes in salivary gland tumors

Salivary gland tumors represent a diverse group of neoplasms that occasionally pose a diagnostic challenge for pathologists, particularly with limited sampling. Gene fusions, which may reflect genetic drivers, are increasingly recognized in a subset of these neoplasms, and can be leveraged for diagnostic purposes. We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 80 benign and malignant salivary gland tumors, enriched for subtypes known to harbor recurrent fusion events, to validate the diagnostic use of a targeted RNA sequencing assay to detect fusion transcripts. Testing identified fusion genes in 71% (24/34) of pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma-ex-pleomorphic adenoma, with 56% of cases showing rearrangement of PLAG1 and 15% HMGA2. In addition to confirming known partners for these genes, novel PLAG1 fusion partners were identified, including DSTN, NTF3, and MEG3; CNOT2 was identified as a novel fusion partner for HMGA2. In adenoid cystic carcinoma, 95% of cases (19/20) were positive for a fusion event. MYB was rearranged in 60% (12/20), MYBL1 in 30% (6/20), and NFIB in 5% (1/20); two tumors exhibited novel fusion products, including NFIB-TBPL1 and MYBL1-VCPIP1. Fusion genes were identified in 64% (9/14) of cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma; MAML2 was confirmed to partner with either CRTC1 (43%) or CRTC3 (21%). One salivary duct carcinoma was found to harbor a novel RAPGEF6-ACSL6 fusion gene. Finally, as anticipated, gene fusions were not detected in any of the five acinic cell carcinomas included in the cohort. In summary, targeted RNA sequencing represents a diagnostically useful ancillary technique for identifying a variety of existing, and novel, fusion transcripts in the classification of salivary gland neoplasms.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands revisited with special reference to histologic grading and CRTC1/3-MAML2 genotyping

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common carcinoma of the salivary glands. Here, we have used two large patient cohorts with MECs comprising 551 tumors to study clinical, histological, and molecular predictors of survival. One cohort (n = 167), with known CRCT1/3-MAML2 fusion status, was derived from the Hamburg Reference Centre (HRC; graded with the AFIP and Brandwein systems) and the other (n = 384) was derived from the population-based Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia (LKR-NRW; graded with the AFIP system). The reliability of both the AFIP and Brandwein grading systems was excellent (n = 155). The weighted kappa for inter-rater agreement was 0.81 (95% CI 0.65-0.97) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.96) for the AFIP and Brandwein systems, respectively. The 5-year relative survival was 79.7% (95% CI 73.2-86.2%). Although the Brandwein system resulted in a higher rate of G3-MECs, survival in G3-tumors (AFIP or Brandwein grading) was markedly worse than in G1/G2-tumors. Survival in > T2 tumors was markedly worse than in those with lower T-stage. Also, fusion-negative MECs had a worse 5-year progression-free survival. The frequency of fusion-positive MECs in the HRC cohort was 78.4%, of which the majority (86.7%) was G1/G2-tumors. In conclusion, the AFIP and Brandwein systems are useful in estimating prognosis and to guide therapy for G3-MECs. However, their significance regarding young age (≤ 30 years) and location-dependent heterogeneity of in particular G2-tumors is more questionable. We conclude that CRTC1/3-MAML2 testing is a useful adjunct to histologic scoring of MECs and for pinpointing tumors with poor prognosis with higher precision, thus avoiding overtreatment.

2021 Update on Diagnostic Markers and Translocation in Salivary Gland Tumors

Salivary gland tumors are a rare tumor entity within malignant tumors of all tissues. The most common are malignant mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and acinic cell carcinoma. Pleomorphic adenoma is the most recurrent form of benign salivary gland tumor. Due to their low incidence rates and complex histological patterns, they are difficult to diagnose accurately. Malignant tumors of the salivary glands are challenging in terms of differentiation because of their variability in histochemistry and translocations. Therefore, the primary goal of the study was to review the current literature to identify the recent developments in histochemical diagnostics and translocations for differentiating salivary gland tumors.

Epithelial cell plasticity: breaking boundaries and changing landscapes

Epithelial tissues respond to a wide variety of environmental and genotoxic stresses. As an adaptive mechanism, cells can deviate from their natural paths to acquire new identities, both within and across lineages. Under extreme conditions, epithelial tissues can utilize "shape-shifting" mechanisms whereby they alter their form and function at a tissue-wide scale. Mounting evidence suggests that in order to acquire these alternate tissue identities, cells follow a core set of "tissue logic" principles based on developmental paradigms. Here, we review the terminology and the concepts that have been put forward to describe cell plasticity. We also provide insights into various cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including genetic mutations, inflammation, microbiota, and therapeutic agents that contribute to cell plasticity. Additionally, we discuss recent studies that have sought to decode the "syntax" of plasticity-i.e., the cellular and molecular principles through which cells acquire new identities in both homeostatic and malignant epithelial tissues-and how these processes can be manipulated for developing novel cancer therapeutics.

Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

High-grade Transformation/Dedifferentiation in Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Occurrence Across Subtypes and Clinical Significance

High-grade transformation (HGT) or dedifferentiation has been described in a variety of salivary gland carcinomas, including acinic cell carcinoma, secretory carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma, polymorphous adenocarcinoma, low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma. High-grade (HG) transformed tumors are composed of a conventional low-grade component characterized by specific microscopic and immunohistochemical features for the given entity, intermingled with or juxtaposed to areas of HG morphology. This is usually either poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, carcinoma not otherwise specified, or undifferentiated carcinoma, in which the original line of differentiation is lost. The HG component is composed of solid nests of anaplastic cells with large vesicular pleomorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant cytoplasm. Frequent mitoses and extensive necrosis may be present. The Ki-67 labeling index is consistently higher in the HG component. The molecular genetic mechanisms responsible for HGT of salivary gland carcinomas are largely unknown, though p53 inactivation and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression and/or gene amplification have been demonstrated in the HG component in a few examples, the frequency varies for each histologic type. Salivary gland carcinomas with HGT are more aggressive than conventional carcinomas, with a higher local recurrence rate and a poorer prognosis. They have a high propensity for cervical lymph node metastasis suggesting a need for a wider resection and neck dissection. HGT of salivary gland carcinoma can occur either at initial presentation or less commonly at the time of recurrence, sometimes following postoperative radiotherapy. The potential for HGT in almost any type of salivary gland carcinoma warrants a thorough sampling of all salivary gland malignancies to prevent oversight of a HG component.

Diagnostic discrepancy in second opinion reviews of primary epithelial neoplasms involving salivary gland: An 11-year experience from a tertiary referral center focusing on useful pathologic approaches and potential clinical impacts

AIMS

In the era of precision medicine, accurate pathologic diagnoses are crucial for appropriate management.

METHODS

We herein described the histologic features and clinical impacts of 66 salivary gland epithelial neoplasms in which the diagnosis was altered after expert review.

RESULTS

The most common revised diagnosis was that of salivary duct carcinoma (SDC, n = 12), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 12), and myoepithelial carcinoma (n = 10). The most common initial diagnosis was mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 19) with SDC being the most common revised diagnosis (7/19). Thirteen salivary gland carcinomas were initially diagnosed as benign entities, whereas five benign tumors were initially interpreted as carcinoma. The change in diagnosis was considered to be clinically significant in 65 (97%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Given their rarity, salivary gland neoplasms are prone to diagnostic inaccuracy and discrepancy. A constellation of histologic features and ancillary studies are useful in reaching the correct diagnosis, which can have significant clinical impacts.