Methadone: who tapers, when, where, and how?*

What we know and what we don't know about the perioperative use of methadone in children and adolescents

Postoperative pain control is essential to optimizing patient outcomes, improving satisfaction, and allowing patients to resume their baseline functional activities. Methadone, a synthetic mu-opioid agonist, has multiple pharmacologic properties that may be optimal for perioperative use. Compared to other opioids, methadone has a longer duration of action, rapid onset, extended dosing intervals, high oral bioavailability, low cost, lack of active metabolites, and action on multiple receptors. The current literature examining the use of methadone in the perioperative care of children and adolescents is limited and most often reported within the context of spine or cardiothoracic surgery. Overall, these studies support the hypothesis that perioperative methadone in pediatric patients may decrease postoperative pain, opioid consumption, length-of-stay, and the incidence of some opioid-related side effects, like constipation and urinary retention. A variety of protocols for the perioperative use of methadone have been described, including a single intraoperative dose as well as multiple small doses within multimodal pain protocols. The superiority of these protocols has not been established. Like all opioids, methadone has a side effect profile which includes nausea, vomiting, reduced GI motility, sedation, and respiratory depression at high doses. There is also a concern that it can cause QTc prolongation in patients. The primary aim of this educational review is to examine the pharmacologic data, published perioperative protocols, dosing considerations, and risks and benefits associated with inclusion of methadone in analgesic regimens for surgical patients. A secondary aim is to introduce opportunities for research around the perioperative use of methadone in children and adolescents. Based on our review, we would prioritize establishing optimal procedure-specific methadone protocols, determining generalizability for use in routine pediatric surgeries, and investigating methadone safety and efficacy prospectively as the primary opioid for pain management in the postanesthesia care unit or postsurgical floors.

Methadone: applications in pediatric anesthesiology and critical care medicine

Like morphine, methadone is a pure agonist at the µ opioid receptor. However, in distinction to morphine which has an elimination half-life of 2-3 h, methadone has an elimination half-life of 24-36 h. In addition to its effects at the µ opioid receptor, methadone is an antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and also inhibits the reuptake of the neurotransmitters, serotonin and norepinephrine, in the central nervous system. Given its long half-life and high oral bioavailability, methadone has had a primary role in the outpatient treatment of patients with a history of opioid abuse or addiction. However, its unique pharmacology and cellular effects make it a valuable agent in the treatment of both acute and chronic pain of various etiologies. The following manuscript reviews the pharmacologic properties of methadone and discusses its clinical applications in the practice of pediatric anesthesiology and pediatric critical care medicine.

Importance of the use of protocols for the management of analgesia and sedation in pediatric intensive care unit

Summary Introduction: Analgesia and sedation are essential elements in patient care in the intensive care unit (ICU), in order to promote the control of pain, anxiety and agitation, prevent the loss of devices, accidental extubation, and improve the synchrony of the patient with mechanical ventilation. However, excess of these medications leads to rise in morbidity and mortality. The ideal management will depend on the adoption of clinical and pharmacological measures, guided by scales and protocols. Objective: Literature review on the main aspects of analgesia and sedation, abstinence syndrome, and delirium in the pediatric intensive care unit, in order to show the importance of the use of protocols on the management of critically ill patients. Method: Articles published in the past 16 years on PubMed, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Library, with the terms analgesia, sedation, abstinence syndrome, mild sedation, daily interruption, and intensive care unit. Results: Seventy-six articles considered relevant were selected to describe the importance of using a protocol of sedation and analgesia. They recommended mild sedation and the use of assessment scales, daily interruptions, and spontaneous breathing test. These measures shorten the time of mechanical ventilation, as well as length of hospital stay, and help to control abstinence and delirium, without increasing the risk of morbidity and morbidity. Conclusion: Despite the lack of controlled and randomized clinical trials in the pediatric setting, the use of protocols, optimizing mild sedation, leads to decreased morbidity.

Systemwide change of sedation wean protocol following pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction

IMPORTANCE

Pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) remains the standard surgical technique for expanding a stenotic airway and necessitates a multidisciplinary team. Sedation wean following LTR is a critical component of perioperative care. We identified variation and communications deficiencies with our sedation wean practice and describe our experience implementing a standardized sedation wean protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To standardize and decrease length of sedation wean in pediatric patients undergoing LTR.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Using Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) methodology, we implemented systemwide change at a tertiary care center with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines. We created a standardized electronic sedation wean communication document and retrospectively examined our experience in 29 consecutive patients who underwent LTR before (n = 16, prewean group) and after (n = 13, postwean group) wean document implementation.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementation of a standardized sedation protocol.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Presence of sedation wean document in the electronic medical record, length of sedation wean, and need for continued wean after discharge.

RESULTS

The sedation wean document was used in 92.3% patients in the postwean group. With the new process, the mean (SD) length of sedation wean was reduced from 16.19 (11.56) days in the prewean group to 8.92 (3.37) days in the postwean group (P = .045). Fewer patients in the postwean group required continued wean after discharge (81.3% vs 33.3%; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

We implemented a systemwide process change with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines, which significantly decreased the time required for sedation wean following LTR. Our methodological approach may have implications for other heterogeneous patient populations requiring a sedation wean.