Outcomes of Preterm Neonates Transferred Between Tertiary Perinatal Centers

Neonatal Transport Safety Metrics and Adverse Event Reporting: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Neonatal transports are an essential component of regionalized medical systems. Neonates who are unstable after birth require transport to a higher level of care by neonatal transport teams. Data on adverse events on neonatal transports are limited. The aim of this study was to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant studies on adverse events on neonatal transports.

METHODS

We identified 38 studies reporting adverse events on neonatal transports from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. The adverse events were distributed into 5 categories: vital sign abnormalities, laboratory value abnormalities, equipment challenges, system challenges, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and transport-related mortality.

RESULTS

Most of the evidence surrounds vital sign abnormalities during transport (n = 28 studies), with hypothermia as the most frequently reported abnormal vital sign. Fourteen studies addressed laboratory abnormalities, 12 reported on events related to equipment issues, and 4 reported on system issues that lead to adverse events on transport. Of the 38 included studies, 12 included mortality related to transport as an outcome, and 4 reported on cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport. There were significant variations in samples, definitions of adverse events, and research quality.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events during neonatal transport have been illuminated in various ways, with vital sign abnormalities most commonly explored in the literature. However, considerable variation in studies limits a clear understanding of the relative frequencies of each type of adverse event. The transport safety field would benefit from more efforts to standardize adverse event definitions, collect safety data prospectively, and pool data across larger care systems.

Semi-quantitative lung ultrasound score during ground transportation of outborn neonates with respiratory failure

Lung ultrasound score (LUS) is increasingly diffused in neonatal critical care but scanty data are available about its use during transfer of severely ill neonates. We aimed to clarify the effect of ground transportation on LUS evolution, conformity of interpretation, and relationships with oxygenation and clinical severity. This is a single-center, blinded, observational, cross-sectional study. Neonates of any gestational age with respiratory distress appearing within 24 h from birth were transferred by a mobile unit towards neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a tertiary referral center. Calculation of LUS prior to the transportation (T1), in the mobile unit (T2), at the end of transportation (T3), and finally upon NICU admission. LUS in the mobile unit and in the NICU was performed by different physicians blinded to each other's results. LUS did not change overtime (T1: 6.3 (3.5), T2: 6.1 (3.5), T3: 5.8 (3.4); p = 0.479; adjusted for gestational or postnatal age or transport duration: p = 0.951, p = 0.424, and 0.266, respectively) but reliably predicted surfactant need (AUC at T1: 0.833 (95%CI: 0.72-0.92); AUC at T2: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.70-0.91); AUC at T3: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.70-0.90); p always < 0.0001). There were significant agreement (ICC = 0.912 (95%CI: 0.83-0.95); p < 0.001) and correlation (r = 0.905, p < 0.001) between LUS calculated during transportation and in the NICU. LUS during transportation was also significantly correlated with oxygenation index (r = 0.321, p = 0.026; standardized B = 0.397 (95%CI: 0.03-0.76), p = 0.048) and TRIPS-II score (r = 0.302, p = 0.008; standardized B = 0.568 (95%CI: 0.04-1.1), p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

LUS during ground transportation of neonates with respiratory failure is suitable and not influenced by the transportation itself. It has a high agreement with that calculated in the NICU and correlates with patients' oxygenation and severity.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Lung ultrasound is a part of the point-of-care ultrasound, which is becoming an essential tool, to manage critically ill neonates and children in an accurate, non-invasive and quick way.

WHAT IS NEW

• Lung ultrasound score (LUS) is suitable during transportation of critically ill neonates with respiratory failure and is not influenced by the transportation itself. • LUS has a high agreement with that calculated in the NICU and correlates with patients' oxygenation and severity of respiratory failure.

Long-term outcomes of children with neonatal transfer: the Japan Environment and Children's Study

This study aimed to evaluate the association of neonatal transfer with the risk of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years of age. Data were obtained from the Japan Environment and Children's Study. A general population of 103,060 pregnancies with 104,062 fetuses was enrolled in the study in 15 Regional Centers between January 2011 and March 2014. Live-born singletons at various gestational ages, including term infants, without congenital anomalies who were followed up until 3 years were included. Neurodevelopmental impairment was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3) at 3 years of age. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk and 95% confidence interval (CI) for newborns with neonatal transfer. Socioeconomic and perinatal factors were included as potential confounders in the analysis. Among 83,855 live-born singletons without congenital anomalies, 65,710 children were studied. Among them, 2780 (4.2%) were transferred in the neonatal period. After adjustment for potential confounders, the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment (scores below the cut-off value of all 5 domains in the ASQ-3) was higher in children with neonatal transfer compared with those without neonatal transfer (communication: 6.5% vs 3.5%, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.70; gross motor: 7.6% vs 4.0%, OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; fine motor: 11.3% vs 7.1%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.36; problem solving: 10.8% vs 6.8%, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.48; and personal-social: 6.2% vs 2.9%, OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.83).   Conclusion: Neonatal transfer was associated with a higher risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at 3 years of age. What is Known: • Neonatal transfer after birth in preterm infants is associated with adverse short-term outcomes. • Long-term outcomes of outborn infants with neonatal transfer in the general population remain unclear. What is New: • This study suggests that neonatal transfer at birth is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. • Efforts for referring high-risk pregnant women to higher level centers may reduce the incidence of neonatal transfer, leading to improved neurological outcomes in the general population.

Risk Factors for Periventricular Leukomalacia in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and GRADE-Based Assessment of Certainty of Evidence

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the certainty of evidence (CoE) for risk factors of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) in preterm neonates, a common morbidity of prematurity.

METHODS

Medline, CENTRAL, Embase, and CINAHL were searched. Cohort and case-control studies and randomised randomized controlled trials were included. Data extraction was performed in duplicate. A random random-effects meta-analysis was utilizedused. CoE was evaluated as per Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six studies evaluating 95 risk factors for PVL were included. Of the 2,509,507 neonates assessed, 16,569 were diagnosed with PVL. Intraventricular hemorrhage [adjusted odds ratio: 3.22 (2.52-4.12)] had moderate CoE for its association with PVL. Other factors such as hypocarbia, chorioamnionitis, PPROM >48 hour, multifetal pregnancy reduction, antenatal indomethacin, lack of antenatal steroids, perinatal asphyxia, ventilation, shock/hypotension, patent ductus arteriosus requiring surgical ligation, late-onset circulatory collapse, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and neonatal surgery showed significant association with PVL after adjustment for confounders (CoE: very low to low). Amongst the risk factors associated with mother placental fetal (MPF) triad, there was paucity of literature related to genetic predisposition and defective placentation. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the strength of association between invasive ventilation and PVL decreased over time (P < 0.01), suggesting progress in ventilation strategies. Limited studies had evaluated diffuse PVL.

CONCLUSION

Despite decades of research, our findings indicate that the CoE is low to very low for most of the commonly attributed risk factors of PVL. Future studies should evaluate genetic predisposition and defective placentation in the MPF triad contributing to PVL. Studies evaluating exclusively diffuse PVL are warranted.

Association of early postnatal transfer and birth outside a tertiary hospital with mortality and severe brain injury in extremely preterm infants: observational cohort study with propensity score matching

OBJECTIVE

To determine if postnatal transfer or birth in a non-tertiary hospital is associated with adverse outcomes.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study with propensity score matching.

SETTING

National health service neonatal care in England; population data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.

PARTICIPANTS

Extremely preterm infants born at less than 28 gestational weeks between 2008 and 2015 (n=17 577) grouped based on birth hospital and transfer within 48 hours of birth: upward transfer (non-tertiary to tertiary hospital, n=2158), non-tertiary care (born in non-tertiary hospital; not transferred, n=2668), and controls (born in tertiary hospital; not transferred, n=10 866). Infants were matched on propensity scores and predefined background variables to form subgroups with near identical distributions of confounders. Infants transferred between tertiary hospitals (horizontal transfer) were separately matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Death, severe brain injury, and survival without severe brain injury.

RESULTS

2181 infants, 727 from each group (upward transfer, non-tertiary care, and control) were well matched. Compared with controls, infants in the upward transfer group had no significant difference in the odds of death before discharge (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.61) but significantly higher odds of severe brain injury (2.32, 1.78 to 3.06; number needed to treat (NNT) 8) and significantly lower odds of survival without severe brain injury (0.60, 0.47 to 0.76; NNT 9). Compared with controls, infants in the non-tertiary care group had significantly higher odds of death (1.34, 1.02 to 1.77; NNT 20) but no significant difference in the odds of severe brain injury (0.95, 0.70 to 1.30) or survival without severe brain injury (0.82, 0.64 to 1.05). Compared with infants in the upward transfer group, infants in the non-tertiary care group had no significant difference in death before discharge (1.10, 0.84 to 1.44) but significantly lower odds of severe brain injury (0.41, 0.31 to 0.53; NNT 8) and significantly higher odds of survival without severe brain injury (1.37, 1.09 to 1.73; NNT 14). No significant differences were found in outcomes between the horizontal transfer group (n=305) and controls (n=1525).

CONCLUSIONS

In extremely preterm infants, birth in a non-tertiary hospital and transfer within 48 hours are associated with poor outcomes when compared with birth in a tertiary setting. We recommend perinatal services promote pathways that facilitate delivery of extremely preterm infants in tertiary hospitals in preference to postnatal transfer.

Neuroprotection from acute brain injury in preterm infants

Infants born at ≤32+6 weeks gestation are at higher risk for intracranial ischemic and hemorrhagic injuries, which often occur in the first 72 hours postbirth. Antenatal strategies to reduce the incidence of acute brain injuries include administering maternal corticosteroids and prompt antibiotic treatment for chorioamnionitis. Perinatal strategies include delivery within a tertiary centre, delayed cord clamping, and preventing hypothermia. Postnatal strategies include empiric treatment with antibiotics when chorioamnionitis is suspected, the cautious use of inotropes, the avoidance of blood PCO2 fluctuation, and neutral head positioning. Clinicians should be aware of the policies and procedures that, especially when combined, can provide neuroprotection for preterm infants.

Neonatal transport services, a cross-sectional study

Objective: To understand the process and challenges facing neonatal transport in Canada and to delineate their composition and working.Subjects and methodology: An online questionnaire was sent to all neonatal transport team directors/coordinators in Canada. The questionnaire covered different aspects of transport and was pilot tested prior to finalization. The responses were anonymous to the investigators.Results: All sixteen neonatal transport teams in Canada surveyed. Fifteen teams responded. Dedicated team as a model was adopted by 12 teams (80%). A combined Neonatal/pediatrics team, where the team could be assembled by either neonatal or pediatrics intensive care staff, adopted by two (13%). Team members were cross-trained in about quarter of the teams (four teams out of 15) with respiratory therapists and registered nurses performing each other's roles. Neonatal Resuscitation Program was mandatory for all teams that responded (15 teams) to become certified as a neonatal transport team member. Nine teams use a central dispatch phone call system.Conclusion: As the first to comprehensively describe the status of neonatal transport in Canada, our study shows that neonatal transport teams have similarities as well as differences. Regionalization and differences in referral practices, geography, provincial laws, and manpower are the main reasons why teams may have their individual variations in policies, protocols, and logistics. Our data can be utilized by health professionals and policy makers to improve neonatal transport logistics within their health care systems resulting in better outcomes of transported neonates.

Basic Hemodynamic Monitoring Using Ultrasound or Electrical Cardiometry During Transportation of Neonates and Infants

OBJECTIVES

Electrical cardiometry and heart ultrasound might allow hemodynamic evaluation during transportation of critically ill patients. Our aims were 1) to test feasibility of stroke volume monitoring using electrical cardiometry or ultrasound during transportation and 2) to investigate if transportation impacts on electrical cardiometry and ultrasound reliability.

DESIGN

Prospective, pragmatic, feasibility cohort study.

SETTING

Mobile ICUs specialized for neonatal and pediatric transportation.

PATIENTS

Thirty hemodynamically stable neonates and infants.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients enrolled underwent paired stroke volume measurements (180 before/after and 180 during the transfer) by electrical cardiometry (SVEC) and ultrasound (SVUS).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

No problems or malfunctioning occurred neither with electrical cardiometry nor with ultrasound. Ultrasound lasted on average 90 (10) seconds, while 45 (15) seconds were needed to instigate electrical cardiometry monitoring. Coefficient of variation was higher for SVUS (before/after: 0.57; during: 0.66) than for SVEC (before/after: 0.38; during: 0.36). Correlations between SVEC and SVUS before/after and during the transfer were r equal to 0.57 and r equal to 0.8, respectively (p always < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that stroke volume tends to be higher if measured by electrical cardiometry. SVEC measured before (5.5 [2.4] mL), during (5.4 [2.4] mL), and after the transfer (5.4 [2.3] mL) are similar (p = 0.955); same applies for SVUS before (2.6 [1.5] mL), during (2.4 [2] mL), and after (2.9 [2] mL) the transfer (p = 0.268).

CONCLUSIONS

Basic hemodynamic monitoring is feasible during pediatric and neonatal transportation both with electrical cardiometry and ultrasound. These two techniques show comparable reliability, although stroke volume was higher if measured by electrical cardiometry. The transportation itself does not affect the reliability of stroke volume measurements.

Transfer of Neonates with Critical Congenital Heart Disease Within a Regionalized Network

Regionalization of pediatric cardiac surgical care varies between and within states. In most geographic regions, at least some neonates with critical heart disease are transferred from their birth hospital to a different hospital for surgery. The impact of neonatal transfer for surgery, particularly over a considerable distance (>10 miles), has been largely unexplored. We sought to examine the impact of transferring neonates for cardiac surgery. We queried the New York State Cardiac Surgery database (2005-2014) from a single institution to identify neonates born within the cardiac surgery center and those transferred for surgery. Outcomes were compared between groups, with subgroup analysis of neonates with single ventricle anatomy. 113 surgical neonates were born at the cardiac surgery center, and 268 were transferred to the cardiac surgery center. Median transfer distance was 91 (IQR 73, 94) miles. Age at operation and the need for preoperative ventilation were significantly lower in neonates born at the cardiac surgery center. In addition, single ventricle anatomy was more prevalent among those born at the cardiac surgery center (48.7 vs. 31.3%; p = 0.001). However, postoperative outcomes were the same-30-day survival was similar across groups (birth: 89% vs. transfer: 90%; p = 0.7), and for those with single ventricle palliation (birth: 81% vs. transfer: 81%; p = 0.9). Within our regionalized network, we found no difference in 30-day survival between neonates either born or transferred to a cardiac surgery center, which supports the use of a regionalized network of hospitals to the care of children with congenital heart disease.

[Neonatal transport characteristics]

Neonatal transport is necessary where a neonate is transferred between two care units. It provides all the skills of a dedicated team, representing a real mobile neonatal intensive care unit. Informing and involving the families is essential during this transport, which can be a source of stress for the child and its family.