Optimum Chest Compression Point for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children Revisited Using a 3D Coordinate System Imposed on CT: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study

[Paediatric Life Support]

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill or injured infants, children and adolescents before, during and after respiratory/cardiac arrest.

[Basic life support]

The European Resuscitation Council has produced these basic life support guidelines, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include cardiac arrest recognition, alerting emergency services, chest compressions, rescue breaths, automated external defibrillation (AED), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality measurement, new technologies, safety, and foreign body airway obstruction.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support

These European Resuscitation Council Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill infants and children, before, during and after cardiac arrest.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support

The European Resuscitation Council has produced these basic life support guidelines, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include cardiac arrest recognition, alerting emergency services, chest compressions, rescue breaths, automated external defibrillation (AED), CPR quality measurement, new technologies, safety, and foreign body airway obstruction.

Optimum chest compression point might be located rightwards to the maximum diameter of the right ventricle: A preliminary, retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Some researchers have reported that applying compression closer to the maximum diameter of the left ventricle (Point_max.LV) is associated with worse clinical outcomes, challenging its traditional position as optimum compression point (Point_optimum). By locating the mid-sternum (the actual compression site) in terms of Point_max.LV and its right ventricular equivalent (Point_max.RV), we aimed to determine its optimum horizontal position associated with increased chances of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed at a university hospital from 2014 to 2019 on non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims who underwent chest computed tomography. On absolute x-axis, we designated the x-coordinate of the mid-sternum (x_mid-sternum) as 0 and leftward direction as positive. Re-defining the x-coordinate of Point_max.RV and Point_max.LV as 0 and 1 interventricular unit (IVU), respectively, we could convert x_mid-sternum to "-x_max.RV/(x_max.LV - x_max.RV) (IVU)." Using multiple logistic regression analysis, we investigated whether this converted x_mid-sternum was associated with clinical outcomes, adjusting core elements of the Utstein template.

RESULTS

Among 887 non-traumatic OHCA victims, 124 [64.4 ± 16.7 years, 43 women (34.7%)] were enrolled. Of these, 80 (64.5%) exhibited ROSC. X_mid-sternum ranging from -1.71 to 0.58 (-0.36 ± 0.38) IVU was categorised into quintiles: <-0.60, -0.60 to -0.37, -0.37 to -0.22, -0.22 to -0.07 and ≥-0.07 (reference) IVU. The first quintile was positively associated with ROSC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 9.43 [1.44, 63.3]).

CONCLUSION

Point_optimum might be located far rightwards to Point_max.RV, challenging the traditional assumption identifying Point_optimum as Point_max.LV.

The Maximum Diameter of the Left Ventricle May Not Be the Optimum Target for Chest Compression During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Preliminary, Observational Study Challenging the Traditional Assumption

OBJECTIVE

Researchers have assumed that compressing the point beneath which the left ventricle (LV) diameter is maximum (P_max.LV) would improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes. Defining the midsternum, the currently recommended location for chest compression, as the reference (x = 0), the lateral deviation (x_max.LV) of personalized P_max.LV has become estimable using posteroanterior chest radiography. The authors investigated whether out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, whose x_max.LV was closer to the midsternum and thus had their P_max.LV compressed closer during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, showed better chances of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult OHCA patients with available previous posteroanterior chest radiography.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each clinical outcome, multivariable logistic regression was performed, grouping x_max.LV into tertiles and adjusting the variables selected among the core elements of the Utstein template showing possible differences (p > 0.10) in univariate analysis. Odds ratios were presented as OR (95% confidence interval). Among 268 cases (age 64.4 ± 15.8 y, female 89 [33.2%]), 123 (45.9%) achieved ROSC and 40 (14.9%) survival to discharge. Compared with the third tertile of x_max.LV (59 to ∼101 mm), the first (31 to ∼48 mm) and second (48 to ∼59 mm) tertiles, which had a P_max.LV closer to the midsternum, were negatively associated with ROSC (OR 0.502 [0.262-0.960]; p = 0.037 and OR 0.442 [0.233-0.837]; p = 0.012, respectively) and survival to discharge (OR 0.286 [0.080-1.03]; p = 0.055 and OR 0.046 [0.007-0.308]; p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

OHCA patients with a P_max.LV located closer to the midsternum showed worse chances of ROSC and survival to discharge, which challenges the traditional assumption of identifying P_max.LV as the optimum compression point.

Determination of the theoretical personalized optimum chest compression point using anteroposterior chest radiography

Objective

There is a traditional assumption that to maximize stroke volume, the point beneath which the left ventricle (LV) is at its maximum diameter (P_max.LV) should be compressed. Thus, we aimed to derive and validate rules to estimate P_max.LV using anteroposterior chest radiography (chest_AP), which is performed for critically ill patients urgently needing determination of their personalized P_max.LV.

Methods

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed with non-cardiac arrest adults who underwent chest_AP within 1 hour of computed tomography (derivation:validation=3:2). On chest_AP, we defined cardiac diameter (CD), distance from right cardiac border to midline (RB), and cardiac height (CH) from the carina to the uppermost point of left hemi-diaphragm. Setting point zero (0, 0) at the midpoint of the xiphisternal joint and designating leftward and upward directions as positive on x- and y-axes, we located P_max.LV (x_max.LV, y_max.LV). The coefficients of the following mathematically inferred rules were sought: x_max.LV=α₀*CD-RB; y_max.LV=β₀*CH+γ₀ (α₀: mean of [x_max.LV+RB]/CD; β₀, γ₀: representative coefficient and constant of linear regression model, respectively).

Results

Among 360 cases (52.0±18.3 years, 102 females), we derived: x_max.LV=0.643*CD-RB and y_max.LV=55-0.390*CH. This estimated P_max.LV (19±11 mm) was as close as the averaged P_max.LV (19±11 mm, P=0.13) and closer than the three equidistant points representing the current guidelines (67±13, 56±10, and 77±17 mm; all P<0.001) to the reference identified on computed tomography. Thus, our findings were validated.

Conclusion

Personalized P_max.LV can be estimated using chest_AP. Further studies with actual cardiac arrest victims are needed to verify the safety and effectiveness of the rule.