Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Williams Syndrome Compared With Matched Controls

The association of vasoactive-inotropic score and surgical patients' outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and patient outcomes in surgical settings.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CNKI databases from November 2010, when the VIS was first published, to December 2022. Additional studies were identified through hand-searching the reference lists of included studies. Eligible studies were those published in English that evaluated the association between the VIS and short- or long-term patient outcomes in both pediatric and adult surgical patients. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan Manager version 5.3, and quality assessment followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists.

RESULTS

A total of 58 studies comprising 29,920 patients were included in the systematic review, 34 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Early postoperative VIS was found to be associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 5.20, 95% CI 3.78-7.16), mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.12), acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.41), poor outcomes (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU (OR 3.50, 95% CI 2.25-5.44). The optimal cutoff value for the VIS as an outcome predictor varied between studies, ranging from 10 to 30.

CONCLUSION

Elevated early postoperative VIS is associated with various adverse outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI), mechanical ventilation duration, mortality, poor outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU. Monitoring the VIS upon return to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) could assist medical teams in risk stratification, targeted interventions, and parent counseling.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022359100.

Intensive Care Unit Analgosedation After Cardiac Surgery in Children with Williams Syndrome : a Matched Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular abnormalities are common in patients with Williams syndrome and frequently require surgical intervention necessitating analgesia and sedation in a population with a unique neuropsychiatric profile, potentially increasing the risk of adverse cardiac events during the perioperative period. Despite this risk, the overall postoperative analgosedative requirements in patients with WS in the cardiac intensive care unit have not yet been investigated. Our primary aim was to examine the analgosedative requirement in patients with WS after cardiac surgery compared to a control group. Our secondary aim was to compare the frequency of major ACE and mortality between the two groups.

DESIGN

Matched case-control study.

SETTING

Pediatric CICU at a Tertiary Children's Hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with WS and age-matched controls who underwent cardiac surgery and were admitted to the CICU after cardiac surgery between July 2014 and January 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Postoperative outcomes and total doses of analgosedative medications were collected in the first six days after surgery for the study groups. Median age was 29.8 (12.4-70.8) months for WS and 23.5 (11.2-42.3) months for controls. Across all study intervals (48 h and first 6 postoperative days), there were no differences between groups in total doses of morphine equivalents (5.0 mg/kg vs 5.6 mg/kg, p = 0.7 and 8.2 mg/kg vs 10.0 mg/kg, p = 0.7), midazolam equivalents (1.8 mg/kg vs 1.5 mg/kg, p = 0.4 and 3.4 mg/kg vs 3.8 mg/kg, p = 0.4), or dexmedetomidine (20.5 mcg/kg vs 24.4 mcg/kg, p = 0.5 and 42.3 mcg/kg vs 39.1 mcg/kg, p = 0.3). There was no difference in frequency of major ACE or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with WS received similar analgosedative medication doses compared with controls. There was no significant difference in the frequency of major ACE (including cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and surgical re-intervention) or mortality between the two groups, though these findings must be interpreted with caution. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the adequacy of pain/sedation control, factors that might affect analgosedative needs in this unique population, and the impact on clinical outcomes.