An international fellowship training program in pediatric emergency medicine: establishing a new subspecialty in the Land of the Dragon

Host perspectives on international fieldwork placements for U.S.-based genetic counseling students

Genetic counseling students from the United States are often interested in international summer fieldwork placements, but little is known about the hosts' perspectives when considering such requests. We sent out surveys to 132 international genetics providers (genetics clinics and genetics programs), to identify advantages, barriers and expectations for U.S.-based genetic counseling students seeking a fieldwork placement. Twenty-seven (20.4% response rate) participants from 14 different countries shared their experiences and views. Providers placed higher emphasis on teaching and benefits to students (95.2%) rather than intrinsic benefits to their programs (90.4%). Lack of American Board of Genetic Counseling's (ABGC) reciprocal recognition (30%) and cost of training (25%), were rated as the strongest barriers to hosting U.S.-based students. Surprisingly, 'Language Barrier' (20%), although mentioned in open-ended comments, was not ranked highly as a barrier. When asked about expectations of students, active participation in student-led counseling sessions under supervision was encouraged by a majority of participants (55.6%). Where most genetic counseling literature is U.S.-centric, this study reports on insights gathered from international genetics providers. Our study encourages U.S.-based programs to consider these findings when designing exchange programs and international fieldwork placements.

Current progress in international pediatric emergency medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past four decades, pediatric emergency Medicine (PEM) has witnessed significant global development, with a notable increase in training programs and official recognition by regulatory bodies. However, disparities persist in the recognition of PEM as an independent subspecialty, availability of training programs on a global scale, academic recognition, and the ability to provide high-quality care to children worldwide. There is paucity of published literature regarding development of PEM globally. This review explores the current trends and challenges in international pediatric emergency medicine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current trends in international pediatric emergency medicine encompass the provision of training in pediatric-focused emergency and acute care, increased propagation of evidence-based guidelines specific to the care of children, the growth of collaborative research networks and interest groups within national and international societies. Simultaneously, the field continues to face challenges such as the lack of recognition, inequities in access, and a lack of dissemination of global PEM initiatives.

SUMMARY

While recent advancements have significantly enhanced the state of international pediatric emergency medicine, including pediatric specific research networks and training programs, barriers still hinder its overall quality. Many of these obstacles are not unique to pediatric emergency medicine but are directly affected by financial disparities and lack of governmental and public recognition of the essential role of pediatric emergency care.

Impact of a 1-Year Pediatric Emergency Medicine Training Program for International Medical Graduates

OBJECTIVES

The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto has offered a 1-year subspecialty residency training program in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) to Canadian and internationally trained pediatricians and emergency physicians since 1993. The program is intended to support clinical service delivery while simultaneously offering a unique educational opportunity to Canadian and international physicians who desire 1 year of clinically focused training. We describe the experiences and career outcomes of participants who completed this program.

METHODS

Two surveys were sent to the 68 individuals who completed the clinical fellowship program from its inception in 1993 until 2014. A blinded survey focused on the fellowship experience and subsequent career activities. A nonblinded survey subsequently determined whether participants had served as a medical director or training program director.

RESULTS

Sixty of the 68 participants (88%) completed the blinded survey. Ninety-one percent were in practice in emergency medicine. Twenty-five percent of the participants were living in Canada, compared with 17% before completing the program. This net migration of 8% was not significant (P = 0.26). Thirty-six of the 50 participants (72%) who applied from outside Canada responded to the nonanonymous survey; 18 (50%) had served as an emergency department medical director, and 18 (50%) reported serving as a PEM training program director.

CONCLUSIONS

Many participants attained leadership positions in PEM in countries outside of North America and/or participated in training program development. There was no significant change in the proportion of participants living in North America at the time of application compared with the time of survey completion.

Assessing the effectiveness of pediatric emergency medicine education in emergency medicine residency training: A national survey

Background:

Evaluating the effectiveness of pediatric emergency medicine training is essential to ensure that emergency physicians and emergency medicine residents have sufficient knowledge, skill, and confidence in optimizing care for acute pediatric visits. Although the field of pediatric emergency medicine has experienced phenomenal growth in past decades, it still faces challenges in how to best implement the curriculums in emergency medicine residency training programs.

Objectives:

Exploring emergency physicians’ and emergency residents’ perspectives on pediatric emergency medicine training in emergency residency training programs in Taiwan through a nationwide survey.

Methods:

The survey was distributed to 1281 emergency physicians and emergency medicine residents in 43 teaching hospitals. The survey inquired about demographic data, hospital type, rank of proctored trainers and assessors, and the setting of pediatric emergency medicine training. Participants’ confidence in managing acute pediatric visits and their satisfaction and reflections of their pediatric emergency medicine training were explored.

Results:

In all, 258 responses were received from 117 residents and 141 emergency physicians. Seventy-seven percent reported working in medical centers. Clinical supervision was primarily performed by pediatric attending physicians and emergency physicians. Fifty-eight percent of participants felt satisfied with their pediatric emergency medicine training. However, only 52.3% felt confident managing acute pediatric visits, which was attributed to inadequate exposure to pediatric patients. Residents noted lack of confidence in managing newborns, infants, and clinical procedures. Therefore, simulation training and point-of-care ultrasound learning were considered advantageous.

Conclusion:

The pediatric emergency medicine training in emergency medicine residency programs is diverse in intensive care training, supervisors, and assessors. Surveys demonstrate that learning experience in pediatric wards and emergency department rotations is associated with overall satisfaction with pediatric emergency medicine training; inadequate exposure to pediatric patients contributed to learners having less confidence. Emergency medicine residency program reform might focus on adequate hands-on pediatric patient care.

CAEP 2018 Academic Symposium: Recommendations for developing and supporting Global Emergency Medicine in Canadian academic emergency departments and divisions

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the CAEP Global Emergency Medicine (EM) panel was to identify successes, challenges, and barriers to engaging in global health in Canadian academic emergency departments, formulate recommendations for increasing engagement of faculty, and guide departments in developing a Global EM program.

METHODS

A panel of academic Global EM practitioners and residents met regularly via teleconference in the year leading up to the CAEP 2018 Academic Symposium. Recommendations were drafted based on a literature review, three mixed methods surveys (CAEP general members, Canadian Global EM practitioners, and Canadian academic emergency department leaders), and panel members' experience. Recommendations were presented at the CAEP 2018 Academic Symposium in Calgary and further refined based on feedback from the Academic Section.

RESULTS

A total of nine recommendations are presented here. Seven of these are directed towards Canadian academic departments and divisions and intend to increase their engagement in Global EM by recognizing it as an integral part of the practice of emergency medicine, deliberately incorporating it into strategic plans, identifying local leaders, providing tangible supports (i.e., research, administration or financial support, shift flexibility), mitigating barriers, encouraging collaboration, and promoting academic deliverables. The final two recommendations pertain to CAEP increasing its own engagement and support of Global EM.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations serve as guidance for Canadian academic emergency departments and divisions to increase their engagement in Global EM.

Global health and emergency care: a postgraduate medical education consensus-based research agenda

Global emergency medicine (EM) is a rapidly growing field within EM, as evidenced by the increasing number of trainees and clinicians pursuing additional experiences in global health and emergency care. In particular, many trainees now desire opportunities at the postgraduate level by way of global EM fellowship programs. Despite this growing popularity, little is known of the effects of postgraduate training in global health and emergency care on learners and patients in the United States and abroad. During the 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference on global health and emergency care, a group of leading educators at the postgraduate medical education level convened to generate a research agenda of pressing questions to be answered in this area. The consensus-based research agenda is presented in this article.

Assessment of cancer pain management knowledge in southwest China: a survey of 259 physicians from small city and county hospitals

BACKGROUND

Pain management is a critical issue in the care of cancer patients in China, especially in small city and county hospitals in southwest China.

OBJECTIVE

The study intended to determine Chinese physicians' competence in cancer pain management and to assess their opinions on barriers to optimal pain management.

DESIGN

A questionnaire on pain management was given to 259 fellows after their general orientation meeting at a tertiary teaching hospital. The questionnaire was adapted from an earlier study by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

RESULTS

The majority of the fellows believed that 70% of cancer patients suffer pain. Nearly 90% (224/259) indicated that their training in cancer pain management was poor. The fellows stated that concern about morphine addiction was the primary reason they hesitated to prescribe opioids, and they identified inadequate assessment of cancer pain as the most significant barrier to optimal management of cancer pain.

CONCLUSION

The study reflects to some extent the state of pain management in hospitals in southwest China. Medical students and physicians in China need improved pain management education.