Two Seating Systems' Effects on an Adolescent With Cerebral Palsy and Severe Scoliosis

The clinical effectiveness of custom-contoured seating for wheelchair users with neuromuscular disorders: a scoping review

Despite its widespread use, the clinical effectiveness of custom-contoured wheelchair seating for individuals with neuromuscular disorders remains unclear. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge databases in November 2021 and updated April 2022. A total of 17 full text articles were included. Discussion themes were grouped based on three outcomes of interest: (1) posture and musculoskeletal deformity, (2) quantitative measures of body structures and functions, and (3) qualitative perceptions, opinions, and quality of life indicators. This review highlighted the lack of literature exploring the impact of custom-contoured seating on cardiopulmonary function, pressure injury management, and upper limb function; although, there was no indication that risk is increased compared to alternative seating and it performed well in terms of perceived user satisfaction, comfort, and function. The findings also demonstrated immediate benefits to postural alignment, although, the longitudinal effect on progression of musculoskeletal deformity compared to alternative seating is more ambiguous. This review aimed to scope the evidence-base for custom-contoured seating for wheelchair users with neuromuscular disorders to synthesize information from the existing literature, inform current practice, and identify knowledge gaps for further experimental investigation.

Prevention and management of respiratory disease in young people with cerebral palsy: consensus statement

Respiratory illness is the leading cause of mortality in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Although risk factors for developing chronic respiratory illness have been identified, comprehensive clinical care recommendations for the prevention and management of respiratory illness do not currently exist. We invited over 200 clinicians and researchers from multiple disciplines with expertise in the management of respiratory illness in children with CP to develop care recommendations using a modified Delphi method on the basis of the RAND Corporation-University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. These recommendations are intended for use by the wide range of practitioners who care for individuals living with CP. They provide a framework for recognizing multifactorial primary and secondary potentially modifiable risk factors and for providing coordinated multidisciplinary care. We describe the methods used to generate the consensus recommendations, and the overall perspective on assessment, prevention, and treatment of respiratory illness in children with CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The first consensus statement for preventing and managing respiratory disease in cerebral palsy (CP). Risk factors for respiratory disease in CP should be identified early. Individuals with CP at risk of respiratory disease require regular assessment of risk factors. Effective partnerships between multidisciplinary teams, individuals with CP, and families are essential. Treatment of respiratory disease in individuals with CP must be proactive.

Single-case Design Studies in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review

Aim: To critically evaluate single-case design (SCD) studies performed within the population of children/adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).Methods: A scoping review of SCD studies of children/adolescents with CP. Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted. Articles were evaluated using the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT 2015). Comments regarding strengths and limitations were analyzed.Results: Studies investigated the effects of a wide range of interventions on various outcomes. Most SCD types were adopted in multiple studies. All studies used visual inspection rather than visual analysis, often complemented with basic statistical descriptives. Risk of bias was high, particularly concerning internal validity. Many CENT items were insufficiently reported. Several benefits and limitations of SCD were identified.Conclusions: The quality of evidence from results of SCD studies needs to be increased through risk of bias reduction.

Interventions for management of respiratory disease in young people with cerebral palsy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Respiratory disease is a leading cause of hospitalizations and deaths in young people with cerebral palsy (CP). It is insidious and multifactorial. Clinical management can be complex. This systematic review describes effects of interventions for the prevention and management of respiratory disease in young people with CP.

METHODS

Nine databases (Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, EMCare, MEDLINE, PEDro, OpenGrey, ScienceDirect, and SpeechBITE) were searched. Eligibility criteria were as follows: the population included at least 50% individuals with CP aged under 26 years, the intervention was for chronic respiratory illness, the outcomes were any measurable indicators of respiratory health or morbidity; the study design could be any original study reporting effects of an intervention on measurable outcomes, and the study was published January 1998 or later. The American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine methodology guided study appraisal and synthesis. The review was registered with PROSPERO (reference number CRD42018086314).

RESULTS

The search yielded 3,347 papers; 37 papers (reporting 34 studies) of these met the eligibility criteria. They included 582 participants with CP (ranging from 1 to 77 across studies) with ages from 5 months to 25 years. Interventions were diverse and included: airway clearance techniques, exercise, positioning, mealtime management, salivary management, upper airway interventions, antibiotics, gastro-intestinal interventions, and spinal surgery. There were no interventions aimed at prevention of respiratory disease in this population. Research designs were classified as Levels 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 2), 4 (n = 25), and 5 (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence for most respiratory interventions for young people with CP is absent or weak. No controlled trials demonstrated significant effects on respiratory morbidity, owing to their scarcity, weak designs, and inadequate power. There is an urgent need for well-designed prospective controlled studies investigating prevention and management of respiratory disease in young people with CP.

Use of single-subject research designs in seating and wheeled mobility research: a scoping review

Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) in seating and wheeled mobility practice is often hindered by a dearth of published research.Purpose: The purpose of this review was to explore and critically appraise the use of single-subject research designs (SSRDs) in seating and wheeled mobility studies published between January 1995 and May 2018.Study Selection: Primary source, peer-reviewed SSRDs focused on exploring the impact of a seating and wheeled mobility intervention were included in the review.Data Extraction: Relevant data extraction, determination of level of evidence, evaluation of methodological rigor, and assessment of the risk of bias were each independently performed.Data Synthesis: The review yielded 19 studies (2 Level III, 15 Level IV, and 2 Level V). A majority of these studies incorporated a withdrawal-type of SSRD and involved subjects representing patient populations with seating and wheeled mobility needs. Methodological rigor/quality features most commonly absent in the included studies included: blinding/masking, inter-rater or intra-rater reliability, >5 data points in each phase, planned replication (≥3 subjects), procedural fidelity methods, randomization, stability of the data during baseline, statistical analyses and use of subject selection criteria. The limited number of published SSRDs, combined with the lower levels of evidence (Levels III-V) provided by these studies, indicates that the use of SSRDs in seating and wheeled mobility research is in the early stages of development.Conclusions: Increasing the methodological quality and rigor as well as reporting methods in future SSRDs involving seating and wheeled mobility interventions may help to support EBP in this area.Implications for RehabilitationSingle-subject research designs (SSRDs) offer both researchers and clinicians the opportunity to contribute to the existing knowledge base in ways that reflect actual clinical practice.SSRDs provide flexibility in adapting and modifying seating and wheeled mobility-related assistive technology devices to meet the individual needs of specific subjects.SSRDs preserve individual responses to seating and wheeled mobility-related assistive technology devices.SSRDs may help to enhance evidence-based practice (EBP) in seating and wheeled mobility practice by spanning the divide between research and practice.Increasing the methodological quality and rigor as well as reporting methods in future SSRDs may help to support EBP in seating and wheeled mobility practice.