2017 ASTHO President's Challenge: Public Health Approaches to Preventing Substance Misuse and Addiction

Editorial: Adolescent Substance Use Prevention and Treatment Is Our Wheelhouse

In this issue of the Journal, Welsh et al.5 revise and update the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) "Principles of Adolescent Substance Use Disorder Treatment,"6 and the practice recommendations based on these principles, published by Winters et al. in 2018.7 These principles and recommendations are solidly grounded in current research and reemphasize individualized, voluntary, readily available, comprehensive, and integrated long-term treatment that is not solely focused on detoxification; that addresses biopsychosocial issues and comorbid psychiatric diagnoses; and that is tailored to specific populations. They also recommend addressing misuse without disorder, using annual routine medical visits as opportunities for screening, and engaging families and legal systems to promote treatment adherence. However, the problem of adolescent substance use has been presented with new challenges.

Longitudinal Study on Deterrent Effect of Drug-Induced Homicide Law on Opioid-Related Mortality Across 92 Counties and the District of Columbia in the U.S

In response to the opioid epidemic in the United States, the federal and state governments have initiated various public health responses to mitigate the problem. Among others, Drug-Induced Homicide Laws (DIHL) have been introduced to disrupt opioid supply by imposing unconventionally punitive sanctions against sales and distribution. The purpose of this study was to examine whether DIHL had an impact on opioid-related deaths, while controlling for other laws and socioeconomic indices. A dynamic panel model was used with cases from 92 counties across 10 states and the District of Columbia between 2013 and 2018. The findings suggest that DIHL implementation has curtailed the rate of opioid mortality. Supply-interruption approaches may have merits and should be further evaluated.

Community pharmacist engagement in opioid use disorder prevention and treatment behaviors: A descriptive analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study describes community pharmacists' opioid analgesic and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) practice behaviors and behavioral intentions in the context of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS

The study sampling frame consisted of 2302 Tennessee community-practice pharmacists who were asked to complete a mailed, paper questionnaire. Behavioral intentions were elicited by asking pharmacists to indicate the number of times (0 to 10) they engage in a behavior, given 10 patients in 3 distinct vignettes. Perceptions of evidence-based MOUD and pain management patient care practices were also elicited.

RESULTS

A response rate of 19.7% was achieved. Pharmacists reported using a brief questionnaire to evaluate risk of opioid misuse with 2.1 ± 3.7 (mean ± SD) out of 10 patients, screening 2.1 ± 3.7 patients for current opioid misuse, discussing co-dispensing of naloxone with 2.9 ± 3.4 to 3.3 ± 4 out of 10 patients at a risk of overdose, and dispensing buprenorphine/naloxone to a mean of 4.6 ± 4.2 patients when they presented a prescription. Respondents perceived 38% of pain management and 30% of MOUD prescribers in their area to practice evidenced-based care.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists have an opportunity to improve the outcomes for patients prescribed opioids by increasing engagement across OUD prevention levels.