1
|
Ferraro MC, Cashin AG, Wand BM, Smart KM, Berryman C, Marston L, Moseley GL, McAuley JH, O'Connell NE. Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 6:CD009416. [PMID: 37306570 PMCID: PMC10259367 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009416.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition that usually occurs in a limb following trauma or surgery. It is characterised by persisting pain that is disproportionate in magnitude or duration to the typical course of pain after similar injury. There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal management of CRPS, although a broad range of interventions have been described and are commonly used. This is the first update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 4, 2013. OBJECTIVES To summarise the evidence from Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of any intervention used to reduce pain, disability, or both, in adults with CRPS. METHODS We identified Cochrane reviews and non-Cochrane reviews through a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, PEDro, LILACS and Epistemonikos from inception to October 2022, with no language restrictions. We included systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with CRPS, using any diagnostic criteria. Two overview authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the reviews and certainty of the evidence using the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE tools respectively. We extracted data for the primary outcomes pain, disability and adverse events, and the secondary outcomes quality of life, emotional well-being, and participants' ratings of satisfaction or improvement with treatment. MAIN RESULTS: We included six Cochrane and 13 non-Cochrane systematic reviews in the previous version of this overview and five Cochrane and 12 non-Cochrane reviews in the current version. Using the AMSTAR 2 tool, we judged Cochrane reviews to have higher methodological quality than non-Cochrane reviews. The studies in the included reviews were typically small and mostly at high risk of bias or of low methodological quality. We found no high-certainty evidence for any comparison. There was low-certainty evidence that bisphosphonates may reduce pain intensity post-intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) -2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.8 to -3.4, P = 0.001; I2 = 81%; 4 trials, n = 181) and moderate-certainty evidence that they are probably associated with increased adverse events of any nature (risk ratio (RR) 2.10, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.47; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 4.6, 95% CI 2.4 to 168.0; 4 trials, n = 181). There was moderate-certainty evidence that lidocaine local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade probably does not reduce pain intensity compared with placebo, and low-certainty evidence that it may not reduce pain intensity compared with ultrasound of the stellate ganglion. No effect size was reported for either comparison. There was low-certainty evidence that topical dimethyl sulfoxide may not reduce pain intensity compared with oral N-acetylcysteine, but no effect size was reported. There was low-certainty evidence that continuous bupivacaine brachial plexus block may reduce pain intensity compared with continuous bupivacaine stellate ganglion block, but no effect size was reported. For a wide range of other commonly used interventions, the certainty in the evidence was very low and provides insufficient evidence to either support or refute their use. Comparisons with low- and very low-certainty evidence should be treated with substantial caution. We did not identify any RCT evidence for routinely used pharmacological interventions for CRPS such as tricyclic antidepressants or opioids. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Despite a considerable increase in included evidence compared with the previous version of this overview, we identified no high-certainty evidence for the effectiveness of any therapy for CRPS. Until larger, high-quality trials are undertaken, formulating an evidence-based approach to managing CRPS will remain difficult. Current non-Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for CRPS are of low methodological quality and should not be relied upon to provide an accurate and comprehensive summary of the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Ferraro
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- The School of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia
| | - Keith M Smart
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Physiotherapy Department, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carolyn Berryman
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Louise Marston
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neil E O'Connell
- Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Health and Wellbeing Across the Lifecourse, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Groenke BR, Idiyatullin D, Gaalaas L, Petersen A, Law A, Barsness B, Royal M, Fok A, Nixdorf DR. Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI versus CBCT to Detect Vertical Root Fractures Using MicroCT as a Reference Standard. J Endod 2023; 49:703-709. [PMID: 36972896 PMCID: PMC10330038 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vertical root fracture (VRF) in root-canal-treated teeth frequently results in tooth loss, partly because VRFs are difficult to diagnose and when detected the fracture is often beyond the point of preservation with surgical intervention. Nonionizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated the ability to detect small VRFs, but it is unknown how its diagnostic capabilities compare with the current imaging standard for VRF detection, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This investigation aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity between MRI and CBCT for detecting VRF, using micro-computed tomography (microCT) as a reference. METHODS A total of 120 extracted human tooth roots were root canal treated using common techniques, and VRFs were mechanically induced in a proportion. Samples were imaged using MRI, CBCT, and microCT. Axial MRI and CBCT images were examined by 3 board-certified endodontists, who evaluated VRF status (yes/no) and gave a confidence assessment for that decision, from which a receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were calculated, sensitivity and specificity, and area under the curve. RESULTS Intra-rater reliability was 0.29-0.48 for MRI and 0.30-0.44 for CBCT. Inter-rater reliability for MRI was 0.37 and for CBCT 0.49. Sensitivity was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.78) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45-0.70), and specificity 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95) for MRI and CBCT, respectively. Area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83) for MRI and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.84) for CBCT. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity between MRI and CBCT in detecting VRF, despite the early-stage development of MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth R Groenke
- Division of TMD and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | | | - Laurence Gaalaas
- Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ashley Petersen
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Alan Law
- Private Practice, The Dental Specialists, Woodbury, Minnesota; Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Mathew Royal
- Private Practice, The Dental Specialists, Roseville, Minnesota
| | - Alex Fok
- Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Donald R Nixdorf
- Division of TMD and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Radiology & Neurology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ashikawa Y, Kusunoki Nakamoto F, Sato T, Katsumata J, Bannai T, Seki T, Takeda M, Shiio Y. Successful Treatment of Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus Complicated by Intense Orbital Inflammation Using Laser Irradiation over the Stellate Ganglion. Intern Med 2023; 62:623-627. [PMID: 35831112 PMCID: PMC10017239 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9503-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
A 56-year-old man presented with right-sided headache and ptosis accompanied by a facial skin rash. He was diagnosed with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Despite acyclovir and steroid therapy, the ocular symptoms worsened. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed severe orbital inflammation and abnormal lesions in the right trigeminal nucleus and tract. The effects of re-administration of intravenous acyclovir and steroid pulse therapy were limited. Laser irradiation of the stellate ganglion (SGL) and high-dose oral prednisolone therapy were effective. Our experience suggests the efficacy of early multimodal treatment, including SGL, in treating ocular symptoms associated with HZO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Japan
| | | | - Taro Bannai
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Japan
| | - Tomonari Seki
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Japan
| | - Masako Takeda
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Japan
| | - Yasushi Shiio
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Treatment modalities and risk factors associated with refractory neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve following oral surgery: a multicentre retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47:794-801. [PMID: 29307502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Little research has been conducted into hypoesthesia, and no studies have elucidated the risk factors for refractory hypoesthesia and compared treatment modalities. The purpose of this multicentre retrospective cohort study was to investigate the relationships between various risk factors, treatment modalities, and refractory hypoesthesia. Risk factors for refractory hypoesthesia after oral surgery were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. To minimize the selection bias associated with a retrospective data analysis, a propensity score analysis was performed between the medication and non-medication groups (65 sites in each group). Moderate or severe hypoesthesia (odds ratio 13.42) and no or late administration of ATP/vitamin B12 (odds ratio 2.28) were significantly associated with refractory hypoesthesia. In the propensity score analysis, the incidence rate of refractory hypoesthesia in the medication group was lower than that in the non-medication group (P<0.001). This study demonstrated the multivariate relationships between various risk factors, treatment modalities, and refractory hypoesthesia. Moderate or severe hypoesthesia and no or late administration of ATP/vitamin B12 were significantly associated with refractory hypoesthesia. Therefore, clinicians should consider these risk factors and initiate early oral administration of ATP/vitamin B12 in cases of hypoesthesia.
Collapse
|