Opportunities for Radiosensitization in the Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Era

Vascular damage in tumors: a key player in stereotactic radiation therapy?

The use of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for cancer treatment has grown in recent years, showing excellent results for some tumors. The greatly increased doses per fraction in SRT compared to conventional radiotherapy suggest a 'new biology' that determines treatment outcome. Proposed mechanisms include significant damage to tumor blood vessels and enhanced antitumor immune responses, which are also vasculature-dependent. These ideas are mostly based on the results of radiation studies in animal models because direct observations in humans are limited. However, even preclinical findings are somewhat incomplete and result in ambiguous conclusions. Current evidence of vasculature-related mechanisms of SRT is reviewed. Understanding them could result in better optimization of SRT alone or in combination with immune or other cancer therapies.

Is hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with portal vein tumor thrombosis potentially curable by radiotherapy in the form of stereotactic body radiation therapy?

PURPOSE

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is dismal. Despite best treatment and care, the patients with this malignancy only showed 2.7-4 months of overall survival. It is debatable whether liver transplantation helps PVTT sufferers. The effectiveness of radiation therapy in treating HCC patients with PVTT should not be undervalued. By limiting the high dosage region to a small planning target volume, stereotactic radiation delivery has shifted toward hypofractionation, limiting the radiation exposure to healthy organs and tissues. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has a local control rate of 75-100%, depending on the treatment. The major limitation in SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT is the paucity of prospective evidence for longer periods beyond the first two years after treatment. More prospective studies/randomized clinical trials with a longer follow-up, larger sample size, and adequate statistical power are the dire need of the present situation to ascertain the curative effect of SBRT as primary therapy for advanced HCC with PVTT.

CONCLUSION

SBRT can improve survival, particularly for patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment. This review sums up our most current understanding of how radiation therapy, notably SBRT, can be used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma when combined with PVTT. Recent research has led us to believe that irradiation in the form of SBRT may cure hepatocellular carcinoma complicated by PVTT.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Immunological Planning-A Review With a Proposed Theoretical Model

In the stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and immunotherapy era, we are moving toward an “immunological radiation plan”, i.e., radiation scheduling with abscopal effect as a vital endpoint as well. The literature review of part A enumerates the advantages of the intermediate dose of SBRT 6–10 Gy per fraction, appropriate use of dose painting, proper timing with immunotherapy, and the potential of immunoadjuvants to maximize cell kill in the irradiated lesions, found to have improved the abscopal effects. Part B summarizes part A, primarily the findings of animal trials, forming the basis of the tenets of the proposed model given in part C to realize the true abscopal potential of the SBRT tumor cell kill of the index lesions. Part C proposes a theoretical model highlighting tumor vasculature integrity as the central theme for converting “abscopal effect by chance” to “abscopal effect by design” using a harmonized combinatorial approach. The proposed model principally deals with the use of SBRT in strategizing increased cell kill in irradiated index tumors along with immunomodulators as a basis for improving the consistency of the abscopal effect. Included is the possible role of integrating immunotherapy just after SBRT, “cyclical” antiangiogenics, and immunoadjuvants/immune metabolites as abscopal effect enhancers of SBRT tumor cell kill. The proposed model suggests convergence research in adopting existing numerous SBRT abscopal enhancing strategies around the central point of sustained vascular integrity to develop decisive clinical trial protocols in the future.

Advances in Hypofractionated Irradiation-Induced Immunosuppression of Tumor Microenvironment

Hypofractionated radiotherapy is external beam irradiation delivered at higher doses in fewer fractions than conventional standard radiotherapy, which can stimulate innate and adaptive immunity to enhance the body’s immune response against cancer. The enhancement effect of hypofractionated irradiation to immune response has been widely investigated, which is considered an approach to expand the benefit of immunotherapy. Meanwhile, increasing evidence suggests that hypofractionated irradiation may induce or enhance the suppression of immune microenvironments. However, the suppressive effects of hypofractionated irradiation on immunomicroenvironment and the molecular mechanisms involved in these conditions are largely unknown. In this context, we summarized the immune mechanisms associated with hypofractionated irradiation, highlighted the advances in its immunosuppressive effect, and further discussed the potential mechanism behind this effect. In our opinion, besides its immunogenic activity, hypofractionated irradiation also triggers homeostatic immunosuppressive mechanisms that may counterbalance antitumor effects. And this may suggest that a combination with immunotherapy could possibly improve the curative potential of hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Could Protons and Carbon Ions Be the Silver Bullets Against Pancreatic Cancer?

Pancreatic cancer is a very aggressive cancer type associated with one of the poorest prognostics. Despite several clinical trials to combine different types of therapies, none of them resulted in significant improvements for patient survival. Pancreatic cancers demonstrate a very broad panel of resistance mechanisms due to their biological properties but also their ability to remodel the tumour microenvironment. Radiotherapy is one of the most widely used treatments against cancer but, up to now, its impact remains limited in the context of pancreatic cancer. The modern era of radiotherapy proposes new approaches with increasing conformation but also more efficient effects on tumours in the case of charged particles. In this review, we highlight the interest in using charged particles in the context of pancreatic cancer therapy and the impact of this alternative to counteract resistance mechanisms.

Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation-Induced Cancer Cell Death: A Primer

Radiation therapy (RT) is responsible for at least 40% of cancer cures, however treatment resistance remains a clinical problem. There have been recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced cell death. The type of cell death after radiation depends on a number of factors including cell type, radiation dose and quality, oxygen tension, TP53 status, DNA repair capacity, cell cycle phase at time of radiation exposure, and the microenvironment. Mitotic catastrophe (a pathway preceding cell death that happens in mitosis or as a consequence of aberrant mitotic progression) is the primary context of radiation-induced cell death in solid cancers, although in a small subset of cancers such as haematopoietic malignancies, radiation results in immediate interphase apoptosis, occurring within hours after exposure. There is intense therapeutic interest in using stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), a precise, high-dose form of RT given in a small number of fractions, to prime the immune system for cancer cell killing, but the optimal radiation dose and fractionation remain unclear. Additionally, promising novel radiosensitisers targeting the cell cycle and DNA repair pathways are being trialled. In the context of the increasing use of SABR and such novel agents in the clinic, we provide an updated primer on the major types of radiation-induced cell death, focussing on their molecular mechanisms, factors affecting their initiation, and their implications on immunogenicity.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for early-stage small cell lung cancer

Purpose

This study was designed to compare survival outcomes for non-surgically managed T1-T2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Methods

The was queried between 2004-2015 for patients with T1-T2N0M0 SCLC. Patients must have been treated with curative intent SBRT or CFRT (delivered daily or twice daily, 45-70 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). A subset analysis of patient receiving chemotherapy was also performed. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare OS among patients who received chemotherapy.

Results

We evaluated 1378 patients in the general cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis(MVA) in the general cohort revealed that SBRT was significantly associated with improved survival (HR 0.68, p<0.001) along with receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.63, p <0.001). SBRT patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy compared to CFRT patients (p<0.01). In the chemotherapy subset, of 1096 patients, on MVA, there was a trend in favor of the SBRT group (HR 0.73; p=0.06). A 3:1 PSM analysis on the chemotherapy subset found similar results on MVA with a trend in favor of SBRT (p=0.06).

Conclusion

Patients with T1-2N0M0 SCLC treated with SBRT regimens incorporating chemotherapy had comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy using standard fractionation. Treatment paradigms for T1-2N0M0 SCLC incorporating SBRT warrant further exploration and should incorporate chemotherapy.

Radiotherapy toxicity

Radiotherapy is used in >50% of patients with cancer, both for curative and palliative purposes. Radiotherapy uses ionizing radiation to target and kill tumour tissue, but normal tissue can also be damaged, leading to toxicity. Modern and precise radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, may prevent toxicity, but some patients still experience adverse effects. The physiopathology of toxicity is dependent on many parameters, such as the location of irradiation or the functional status of organs at risk. Knowledge of the mechanisms leads to a more rational approach for controlling radiotherapy toxicity, which may result in improved symptom control and quality of life for patients. This improved quality of life is particularly important in paediatric patients, who may live for many years with the long-term effects of radiotherapy. Notably, signs and symptoms occurring after radiotherapy may not be due to the treatment but to an exacerbation of existing conditions or to the development of new diseases. Although differential diagnosis may be difficult, it has important consequences for patients.

Dosimetry Estimate and Initial Clinical Experience with 90Y-PSMA-617

Because of different physical properties, the β-emitters ¹⁷⁷Lu and ⁹⁰Y offer specific radiologic-biologic advantages in dedicated clinical situations. Our objective was to introduce ⁹⁰Y-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 to clinical application, providing additional avenues for personalized medicine. Here, we present our dosimetry estimate for ⁹⁰Y-PSMA-617, report first clinical experiences, and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of varying the β-emitter in PSMA-targeting radioligand therapy. Methods: To approximate radiation dosimetry, 4 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer underwent serially performed imaging up to 1 wk after ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Time-activity curves were extrapolated to the half-life of ⁹⁰Y, and OLINDA was used to calculate the dosimetry estimate. In clinical practice, 11 patients with PSMA-positive lymph-nodal bulk disease were stratified to receive ⁹⁰Y-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (mean, 3.2 GBq; range, 2.8-3.7 GBq); afterward, safety lab tests, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and clinical findings were thoroughly followed. Results: The projected dosimetry for ⁹⁰Y-PSMA-617 estimated a mean kidney dose of 3.47 ± 1.40 Gy/GBq, red marrow dose of 0.11 ± 0.04 Gy/GBq, and salivary gland dose of 5.57 ± 1.34 Gy/GBq; randomly chosen metastases were approximated with 22.8 ± 16.10 Gy/GBq. The observed acute hematologic toxicity (5 cases of leukopenia and 2 of thrombocytopenia, all grade 1 or 2) and clinical side effects (2 cases of transient xerostomia and 1 of nausea, all grade 1 or 2), as well as PSA response (any PSA response, 7/11 patients; >50% PSA decline, 5/11 patients), were comparable to ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 literature data. Conclusion: A factor 3-4 lower treatment activity for ⁹⁰Y-PSMA-617 translates into a comparable dosimetry estimate and clinical findings similar to those of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617. However, safety was demonstrated only for patients with oligometastatic disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential in patients with more disseminated bone involvement or visceral metastasis.