1
|
Bouloux GF, Chou J, DiFabio V, Ness G, Perez D, Mercuri L, Chung W, Klasser GD, Bender SD, Kraus S, Crago CA. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024:S0278-2391(24)00200-3. [PMID: 38643965 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Gary F Bouloux
- Family Professor, Division Chief, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
| | - Joli Chou
- Associate Professor, Department Of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vince DiFabio
- Associate Clinical Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Greg Ness
- Emeritus Professor-Clinical, The Ohio State University, Private Practice, Oral and Facial Surgery for Adults and Children, Columbus, OH
| | - Daniel Perez
- Associate Professor and Program Director, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Texas Health Sciences San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Louis Mercuri
- Visiting Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - William Chung
- Clinical Professor, Residency Program Director, Indiana University School of Dentistry and Hospital Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Gary D Klasser
- Certificate Orofacial Pain, Professor, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA
| | - Steven D Bender
- Clinical Associate Professor, Director, Clinical Center for Facial Pain and Sleep Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Texas A&M School of Dentistry, Dallas, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Temporomandibular Joint Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 81:E195-E220. [PMID: 37833023 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
|
3
|
Lombana NF, Mehta IM, Zheng C, Falola RA, Altman AM, Saint-Cyr MH. Updates on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols for plastic surgery of the breast and future directions. Proc AMIA Symp 2023; 36:501-509. [PMID: 37334077 PMCID: PMC10269427 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2210036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Perioperative pain control is an important component of any plastic surgery practice. Due to the incorporation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols, reported pain level, opioid consumption, and hospital length of stay numbers have decreased significantly. This article provides an up-to-date review of current ERAS protocols in use, reviews individual aspects of ERAS protocols, and discusses future directions for the continual improvement of ERAS protocols and control of postoperative pain. ERAS components ERAS protocols have proven to be excellent methods of decreasing patient pain, opioid consumption, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and/or inpatient length of stay. ERAS protocols have three phases: preoperative education and pre-habilitation, intraoperative anesthetic blocks, and a postoperative multimodal analgesia regimen. Intraoperative blocks consist of local anesthetic field blocks and a variety of regional blocks, with lidocaine or lidocaine cocktails. Various studies throughout the surgical literature have demonstrated the efficacy of these aspects and their relevance to the overall goal of decreasing patient pain, both in plastic surgery and other surgical fields. In addition to the individual ERAS phases, ERAS protocols have shown promise in both the inpatient and outpatient sectors of plastic surgery of the breast. Conclusion ERAS protocols have repeatedly been shown to provide improved patient pain control, decreased hospital or PACU length of stay, decreased opioid use, and cost savings. Although protocols have most commonly been utilized in inpatient plastic surgery procedures of the breast, emerging evidence points towards similar efficacy when used in outpatient procedures. Furthermore, this review demonstrates the efficacy of local anesthetic blocks in controlling patient pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas F. Lombana
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Temple, Texas
| | - Ishan M. Mehta
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Temple, Texas
| | - Caiwei Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Reuben A. Falola
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Temple, Texas
| | - Andrew M. Altman
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Temple, Texas
| | - Michel H. Saint-Cyr
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Multimodal Analgesia in the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Concepts and Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10:e4310. [PMID: 35572190 PMCID: PMC9094416 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative pain management is crucial for aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. Poorly controlled postoperative pain results in negative physiologic effects and can affect length of stay and patient satisfaction. In light of the growing opioid epidemic, plastic surgeons must be keenly familiar with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia regimens to optimize postoperative pain control. Methods A review study based on multimodal analgesia was conducted. Results We present an overview of pain management strategies pertaining to aesthetic plastic surgery and offer a multimodal analgesia model for outpatient aesthetic surgery practices. Conclusion This review article presents an evidence-based approach to multimodal pain management for aesthetic plastic surgery.
Collapse
|
5
|
Parsa FD, Singh D. Commentary on: The Nuts and Bolts of a Successful Non-Narcotic Perioperative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:NP1775-NP1777. [PMID: 34331533 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fereydoun D Parsa
- University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Dylan Singh
- University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crystal DT, Cuccolo NG, Plewinski MJ, Ibrahim AMS, Sinkin JC, Lin SJ, Agag RL, Lee BT. Assessment of Opioid-Prescribing Practices in Breast Augmentation: Future Directions for Prescribing Guidelines. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:11-18. [PMID: 32568754 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United States (US) is in the mid of an opioid epidemic propagated, in part, by prescription opioids. With excess overprescribing documented in a variety of surgical procedures, several societies have recommended opioid-prescribing guidelines. Considering the scope and postoperative pain associated with aesthetic plastic surgery procedures, earnest evaluation into opioid-prescribing practices for breast augmentation was conducted. METHODS Members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were electronically surveyed on their opioid-prescribing patterns. The survey was distributed to 1709 plastic surgeons. Descriptive statistics were collated into percentages, deviations, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), when appropriate. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-nine American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery members (13.4%) provided responses. A total of 91.2% of respondents prescribe opioids to patients undergoing breast augmentation. The most commonly prescribed agents included oxycodone/acetaminophen (Percocet, 47.0%) and hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Vicodin, 38.3%). On average, 165.3 ± 81.7 MMEs were dispensed (range, 25.0-600.0 MMEs; number tablets, 5-60). Prescribers felt that a lack of phone-in prescribing (52.4%) and the ease of preemptively prescribing opioids (52.4%) propagate opioid overprescribing. A total of 61.3% of respondents reported that they are or may be in favor of developing plastic surgery societal guidelines related to opioid prescribing. These respondents indicated support for guidelines on opioid-sparing pain management strategies (74.2%) and guidelines identifying the type (54.7%), duration of use (69.5%), and number of opioid tablets (61.7%) necessary for procedures. CONCLUSIONS Considerable variability exists among prescribing patterns after breast augmentation. Societal guidelines aimed at providers and patients may serve a future role in opioid prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael J Plewinski
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Ahmed M S Ibrahim
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeremy C Sinkin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Samuel J Lin
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Richard L Agag
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Bernard T Lee
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Basics and Best Practices of Multimodal Pain Management for the Plastic Surgeon. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e2833. [PMID: 33154874 PMCID: PMC7605865 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pain management is a central focus for the plastic surgeon’s perioperative planning, and it no longer represents a postoperative afterthought. Protocols that rely on opioid-only pain therapy are outdated and discouraged, as they do not achieve optimal pain relief, increase postoperative morbidity, and contribute to the growing opioid epidemic. A multimodal approach to pain management using non-opioid analgesic techniques is an integral component of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Careful perioperative planning for optimal pain management must be achieved in multidisciplinary collaboration with the perioperative care team including anesthesiology. This allows pain management interventions to occur at 3 critical opportunities—preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kawakami J, Abe T, Higaki E, Hosoi T, Fukaya M, Komori K, Ito S, Nakatochi M, Nagino M, Shimizu Y. Scheduled intravenous acetaminophen versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for better short-term outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 2020; 50:1168-1175. [DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02001-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Siddig AI, Alqahtani AM, AlShalawi A, Turkistani M, Binbaz S, Altowairqi A. Awareness of analgesics complications in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. FUTURE JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s43094-020-0018-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
All over the world, analgesics are considered one of the most widely used and abused medications. Painkillers such as paracetamol (acetaminophen), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and aspirin currently represent the principal means of pain management. Unfortunately, paracetamol and NSAIDs have dangerous side effects primarily when they are used improperly and without respect to safety rules. This study aims to assess the awareness of the indications, complications, and contraindications of commonly used analgesics.
Results
A total of 1554 participants responded to the survey, and the findings indicated that the main analgesic used is paracetamol. A proportion of 68.1% of the total number of respondents received their information about analgesic medications from a physician or pharmacist; 95.7% used analgesics when needed, and 70.9% mentioned that they would consult a physician or pharmacist if the pain was not relieved after the use of over-the-counter medications. Nearly 29% were not aware of the possibility of adverse effects of analgesic use.
Conclusion
The most commonly used analgesic is paracetamol, and most of the participants had a poor level of awareness regarding the complications and side effects of analgesics in general. Our recommendation is to conduct a continuous health education campaign about the use of analgesics.
Collapse
|
10
|
Safety of Postoperative Opioid Alternatives in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 144:991-999. [PMID: 31568318 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
With the growing opioid epidemic, plastic surgeons are being encouraged to transition away from reliance on postoperative opioids. However, many plastic surgeons hesitate to use nonopioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and local anesthetic blocks because of concerns about their safety, particularly bleeding. The goal of this systematic review is to assess the validity of risks associated with nonopioid analgesic alternatives. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted regarding the safety of opioid alternatives in plastic surgery. Inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 34 relevant articles. A systematic review was performed because of the variation between study indications, interventions, and complications. Thirty-four articles were reviewed that analyzed the safety of ibuprofen, ketorolac, celecoxib, intravenous acetaminophen, ketamine, gabapentin, liposomal bupivacaine, and local and continuous nerve blocks after plastic surgery procedures. There were no articles that showed statistically significant bleeding associated with ibuprofen, celecoxib, or ketorolac. Similarly, acetaminophen administered intravenously, ketamine, gabapentin, and liposomal bupivacaine did not have any significant increased risk of adverse events. Nerve and infusion blocks have a low risk of pneumothorax. Limitations of this study include small sample sizes, different dosing and control groups, and more than one medication being studied. Larger studies of nonopioid analgesics would therefore be valuable and may strengthen the conclusions of this review. As a preliminary investigation, this review showed that several opioid alternatives have a potential role in postoperative analgesia. Plastic surgeons have the responsibility to lead the reduction of postoperative opioid use by further developing multimodal analgesia.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid misuse occurs commonly among obese patients and after bariatric surgery. However, the risk of new persistent use following postbariatric body contouring procedures remains unknown. METHODS The authors examined insurance claims from Clinformatics Data Mart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minn.) between 2001 and 2015 for opioid-naive patients undergoing five body contouring procedures: abdominoplasty/panniculectomy, breast reduction, mastopexy, brachioplasty, and thighplasty (n = 11,257). Their primary outcomes included both new persistent opioid use, defined as continued prescription fills between 90 and 180 days after surgery, and the prevalence of high-risk prescribing. They used multilevel logistic regression to assess the risk of new persistent use, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS In this cohort, 6.1 percent of previously opioid-naive patients developed new persistent use, and 12.9 percent were exposed to high-risk prescribing. New persistent use was higher in patients with high-risk prescribing (9.2 percent). New persistent use was highest after thighplasty (17.7 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.03 to 0.33). Increasing Charlson comorbidity indices (OR, 1.11; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.17), mood disorders (OR, 1.27; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.54), anxiety (OR, 1.41; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 1.73), tobacco use (OR, 1.22; 95 percent CI, 1.00 to 1.49), neck pain (OR, 1.23; 95 percent CI, 1.04 to 1.46), arthritis (OR, 1.30; 95 percent CI, 1.08 to 1.58), and other pain disorders (OR, 1.36; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 1.60) were independently associated with persistent use. CONCLUSIONS Similar to other elective procedures, 6 percent of opioid-naive patients developed persistent use, and 12 percent were exposed to high-risk prescribing practices. Plastic surgeons should remain aware of risk factors and offer opioid alternatives. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.
Collapse
|
12
|
Preoperative Multimodal Analgesia Decreases Postanesthesia Care Unit Narcotic Use and Pain Scores in Outpatient Breast Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142:443e-450e. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Demsey D, Carr NJ, Clarke H, Vipler S. Managing Opioid Addiction Risk in Plastic Surgery during the Perioperative Period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140:613e-619e. [PMID: 28953743 PMCID: PMC5783634 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000003742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Opioid addiction is a public health crisis that affects all areas of medicine. Large numbers of the population across all racial and economic demographics misuse prescription opioids and use illicit opioids. The current understanding is that opioid misuse is a disease that requires treatment, and is not an issue of choice or character. Use of opioid medication is a necessary part of postoperative analgesia, but many physicians are unsure of how to do this safely given the risk of patients developing an opioid misuse disorder. This review gives an update of the current state of the opioid crisis, explains how current surgeons' prescribing practices are contributing to it, and gives recommendations on how to use opioid medication safely in the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Demsey
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Nicholas J Carr
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Hance Clarke
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| | - Sharon Vipler
- Vancouver, British Columbia; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery and the Fraser Health Substance Use Services, University of British Columbia; and the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The ambulatory setting offers potential advantages for elderly patients undergoing elective surgery due to the advancement in both surgical and anesthetic techniques resulting in quicker recovery times, fewer complications, higher patient satisfaction, and reduced costs of care. This review article aims to provide a practical guide to anesthetic management of elderly outpatients. Important considerations in the preoperative evaluation of elderly outpatients with co-existing diseases, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different anesthetic techniques on a procedural-specific basis, and recommendations regarding the management of common postoperative complications (e.g., pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV], delirium and cognitive dysfunction, and gastrointestinal dysfunction) are discussed. The role of anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians is important for optimizing surgical outcomes for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. The implementation of high-quality, evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly on an ambulatory basis has assumed increased importance. Optimal management of perioperative pain using opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques and preventing PONV using prophylactic antiemetics are key elements for achieving enhanced recovery after surgery.
Collapse
|
15
|
An update on pain management for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 29:674-682. [PMID: 27820738 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the drugs and techniques used for multimodal postoperative pain management in the older population undergoing surgery in the ambulatory setting. RECENT FINDINGS Interest has grown in the possibility of adding adjuncts to a single shot nerve block in order to prolong the local anesthetic effect. The rapid and short-acting local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia are potentially beneficial for day-case surgery in the older population because of shorter duration of the motor block, faster recovery, and less transient neurologic symptoms. Another recent advance is the introduction of intravenous acetaminophen, which can rapidly achieve rapid peak plasma concentration (<15 min) following infusion and analgesic effect in ∼5 min with a duration of action up to 4 h. SUMMARY The nonopioid analgesic therapies will likely assume an increasingly important role in facilitating the recovery process and improving the satisfaction for elderly ambulatory surgery patients. Strategies to avoid the use of opioids and minimize opioid-related side-effects is an important advance as we expand on the use of ambulatory surgery for the aging population.
Collapse
|
16
|
Butts SC, Floyd E, Lai E, Rosenfeld RM, Doerr T. Reporting of Postoperative Pain Management Protocols in Randomized Clinical Trials of Mandibular Fracture Repair: A Systematic Review. JAMA FACIAL PLAST SU 2015; 17:440-8. [PMID: 26335408 DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The control of pain associated with mandibular fractures is an important treatment outcome that affects function, adherence to treatment regimens, and patient comfort and satisfaction. OBJECTIVE To explore the pain management protocols reported in studies of mandibular fractures, including the reporting of quality-of-life measures. EVIDENCE REVIEW PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published from 1970 to July 2014. We followed PRISMA reporting standards to assess study eligibility and extract data. Studies of patients older than 16 years who underwent operative mandibular fracture management were included. The primary data collected included the type of analgesic prescribed, associated adverse effects of the analgesic, method of pain assessment, and use of quality-of-life measures. A pain attentiveness score was assigned to studies based on the comprehensiveness of the information reported. Several variables were reviewed to determine the factors that predict reporting of pain-related data. Assessments of risk for bias were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's domain-based evaluation method. FINDINGS The initial search identified 111 articles, of which 38 met inclusion criteria. Among the 38 reviewed articles, there were 38 trials and 1808 unique patients represented. Among the 38 articles, the procedures reported included maxillomandibular fixation only in 6 (16%), open reduction with internal fixation only in 20 (53%), and both in 12 (32%). Specific analgesics prescribed were reported in only 5 of the 38 studies (13%), and 3 of these used a combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen (paracetamol). Thirteen studies (34%) reported pain assessments and 5 (13%) included quality-of-life measures. Geographic region was the only variable that predicted pain attentiveness, with studies from Europe (3 of 11 studies [27%]) and Asia (6 of 16 studies [38%]) most likely to have a high pain attentiveness score. A low rating was least common in the United States (2 of 5 studies [40%]) (P = .047, Fisher exact test). Most of the studies had unclear (n = 27) or high (n = 6) risks for bias in the key domains assessed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Pain management is a neglected outcome in randomized clinical trials of mandibular trauma; most studies did not describe the specific analgesics used. Many randomized clinical trials (13 [34%]) assessed pain levels among patients without providing information about the agents prescribed. The incorporation of validated pain measures and quality-of-life scores in future studies of mandibular trauma would focus attention on this key outcome measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney C Butts
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, College of Medicine, Brooklyn
| | - Elizabeth Floyd
- Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Erica Lai
- School of Public Health, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Richard M Rosenfeld
- Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn
| | - Timothy Doerr
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|