Perineal Flap Reconstruction following Oncologic Anorectal Extirpation: An Outcomes Assessment

Bilateral Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP) Flap: Modified Concept in Perineal Reconstruction

Background/Objectives: Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision often requires complex closures and is fraught with wound healing complications. Flap-based approaches introduce non-irradiated vascularized tissue to the area of resection to fill a large soft-tissue defect and dead space, reduce the risk of infection, and facilitate wound healing. Employing perforator flaps with their beneficial donor site properties, the authors have developed a concept of bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps to restore extensive perineal defects. Methods: This retrospective case series was conducted between September 2015 and December 2019. We included three patients who received bilateral SGAP flap reconstruction after oncological resection. One deepithelialized SGAP flap was used for obliteration of dead space, combined with the contralateral SGAP flap for superficial defect reconstruction and wound closure. Results: Within this patient population, two male and one female patient, with a median age of 62 years (range, 52-76 years), were included. Six pedicled SGAP flaps were performed with average flap dimensions of 9 × 20 cm (range 7-9 × 19 × 21). No flap loss or no local recurrence were documented. In one case, partial tip necrosis with prolonged serous drainage was observed, which was managed by surgical debridement. No further complications were detected. Conclusions: The combination of two SGAP flaps provides maximal soft tissue for defect reconstruction and obliteration of dead space, while maintaining a very inconspicuous donor site, even with bilateral harvesting. Given these advantages, the authors recommend this promising approach for successful reconstruction of perineal defects.

A comparison of surgical techniques for perineal wound closure following perineal excision: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To mitigate pelvic wound issues following perineal excision of rectal or anal cancer, a number of techniques have been suggested as an alternative to primary closure. These methods include the use of a biological/dual mesh, omentoplasty, muscle flap, and/or pelvic peritoneum closure. The aim of this network analysis was to compare all the available surgical techniques used in the attempt to mitigate issues associated with an empty pelvis.

METHODS

An electronic systematic search using MEDLINE databases (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed (Last date of research was March 15th, 2023). Studies comparing at least two of the aforementioned surgical techniques for perineal wound reconstruction during abdominoperineal resection, pelvic exenteration, or extra levator abdominoperineal excision were included. The incidence of primary healing, complication, and/or reintervention for perineal wound were evaluated. In addition, the overall incidence of perineal hernia was assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-five observational studies and five randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion reporting on 146,398 patients. All the surgical techniques had a comparable risk ratio (RR) in terms of primary outcomes. The pooled network analysis showed a lower RR for perineal wound infection when comparing primary closure (RR 0.53; Crl 0.33, 0.89) to muscle flap. The perineal wound dehiscence RR was lower when comparing both omentoplasty (RR 0.59; Crl 0.38, 0.95) and primary closure (RR 0.58; Crl 0.46, 0.77) to muscle flap.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical options for perineal wound closure have evolved significantly over the last few decades. There remains no clear consensus on the "best" option, and tailoring to the individual remains a critical factor.

Tailored concept for the plastic closure of pelvic defects resulting from extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) or pelvic exenteration

PURPOSE

No standard exists for reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) and pelvic exenteration. We propose a tailored concept with the use of bilateral gluteal V-Y advancement flaps in non-extended ELAPE and with vertical myocutaneous rectus abdominis muscle (VRAM) flaps in extended procedures. This retrospective study analyzes the feasibility of this concept.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrieved all consecutive patients after ELAPE or pelvic exenteration for rectal, anal, or vulva cancer with flap repair from a prospective database. Perineal wound complications were defined as the primary endpoint. Outcomes for the two different flap reconstructions were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2021, we identified 107 patients who met the study criteria. Four patients underwent exenteration with VRAM flap repair after previous V-Y flap fashioning. Therefore, we report on 75 V-Y and 36 VRAM flaps. The V-Y group contained more rectal carcinomas, and the VRAM group exhibited more patients with recurrent cancer, more multivisceral resections, and longer operation times. Perineal wound complications occurred in 21.3% in the V-Y group and in 36.1% in the VRAM group (p = 0.097). Adjusted odds ratio for perineal wound complication was not significantly different for the two flap types.

CONCLUSION

Concerning perineal wound complications, our concept yields favorable results for V-Y flap closure indicating that this less invasive approach is sufficient for non-extended ELAPE. Advantages are a shorter operation time, less donor site morbidity, and the option of a second repair. VRAM flaps were reserved for larger wounds after pelvic exenteration or vaginal repair.

Outcomes of the Composite Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Perineal Reconstruction After Postoncological Abdominoperineal Resection

BACKGROUND

The vertical rectus abdominis flap is considered the gold standard in perineal reconstruction after oncological abdominoperineal resection; however, it has a nonnegligible donor site morbidity. The anterolateral thigh flap offers reliable soft tissue coverage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to analyze long-term outcomes of composite anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis flaps in oncological abdominoperineal resections.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained database.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in the Lausanne University Hospital. Annually, approximately 10 oncological abdomioperineal resections are performed. Literature reports 7% to 20% of patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection require flap reconstruction; in our institution, approximately 2 patients with large defects after abdominoperineal resections required reconstruction.

PATIENTS

Twenty-nine pedicled anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis flaps in 27 consecutive patients (mean age 63 years +/-11.2, 23 with radiochemotherapy) after abdominoperineal resection to cover large defects (median 190 cm2, 48-600 cm2) were analyzed.

INTERVENTION

Pedicled composite anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis flaps were performed after oncological abdominoperineal resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Median follow-up was 16 months (12-48 months).

RESULTS

Flap-related postoperative complications occurred in 16 flaps; flap-survival was 100%. Multivariate logistic analysis identified initial defect size as predictive for complications. Patients with larger defects (≥ 190 cm2) had higher complication rates (p = 0.006). Long-term analysis revealed 3 chronic fistulae, 2 tumor recurrences, 1 flap dysesthesia, and one perineal acne inversa.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include retrospective analysis, selection bias, and lacking a control group. Sample size limits statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicled anterolateral thigh-vastus lateralis flap offers reliable, stable tissue with low morbidity and good long-term outcomes. Complications compared favorably with current literature describing perineal reconstructions with rectus abdominis flaps. The composite anterolateral thigh flap is a valid alternative without the setback of abdominal donor site morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B757.RESULTADOS DEL COLGAJO COMPUESTO ANTEROLATERAL DE MUSLO PARA LA RECONSTRUCCIÓN PERINEAL DESPUÉS DE LA RESECCIÓN ABDOMINOPERINEAL POST ONCOLÓGICAANTECEDENTES:El colgajo vertical de recto abdominal se considera el estándar de oro en la reconstrucción perineal después de la resección abdominoperineal oncológica, sin embargo, tiene una morbilidad no despreciable en el sitio donante. El colgajo anterolateral del muslo ofrece una cobertura confiable de los tejidos blandos.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue analizar los resultados a largo plazo de los colgajos compuestos anterolaterales del muslo - vasto lateral - en resecciones abdominoperineales oncológicas.DISEÑO:Realizamos un análisis, retrospectivo, de tipo cohorte, de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.AJUSTES:Este estudio fue realizado en el hospital universitario de Lausanne. Anualmente se realizan aproximadamente 10 resecciones abdominoperineales oncológicas. La literatura reporta que entre el 7 y el 20% de los pacientes que se someten a una resección abdominoperineal requieren de reconstrucción con colgajo; en nuestra institución, aproximadamente 2 pacientes con grandes defectos tras la resección abdominoperineal requirieron reconstrucción.PACIENTES:Fueron analizados veintinueve colgajos pediculados anterolaterales de muslo - vasto lateral - en 27 pacientes consecutivos (edad media 63 años +/- 11,2, 23 con radio quimioterapia) después de la resección abdominoperineal para cubrir defectos grandes (mediana 190 cm2, 48-600 cm2).INTERVENCIÓN:Tras la resección abdominoperineal oncológica se realizaron colgajos pediculados compuestos anterolaterales de muslo - vasto lateral.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Fue realizado un análisis estadístico descriptivo. Fueron analizados los resultados a corto y largo plazo - fueron realizados así mismo análisis uni y multivariados. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 16 meses (12-48 meses).RESULTADOS:Complicaciones postoperatorias relacionadas con el colgajo ocurrieron en 16 colgajos, la supervivencia del colgajo fue del 100%. El análisis logístico multivariado identificó al tamaño del defecto inicial como predictor de complicaciones. Aquellos pacientes con defectos más grandes (≥190 cm2) tuvieron mayores tasas de complicaciones (p = 0,006). El análisis a largo plazo reveló tres fístulas crónicas, dos recidivas tumorales, una disestesia de colgajo y un acné perineal inverso.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyen análisis retrospectivo, sesgo de selección y falta de grupo de control. El tamaño de la muestra limita el poder estadístico.CONCLUSIONES:El colgajo pediculado anterolateral de muslo - vasto lateral - ofrece tejido confiable y estable con baja morbilidad y buenos resultados a largo plazo. Los resultados de las complicaciones se mostraron favorables con respecto a la literatura actual que describe reconstrucciones perineales con colgajos de recto abdominal. El colgajo compuesto anterolateral de muslo es una alternativa válida sin el revés de la morbilidad del sitio donante abdominal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B757. (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto).

System-Level Determinants of Access to Flap Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection improves outcomes by reducing wound-related complications, particularly in irradiated patients. Little is known regarding system-level factors that impact patients' access to reconstructive surgery following abdominoperineal resection. This study aimed to identify barriers to undergoing reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014, all encounters with colorectal or anorectal carcinoma patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection were extracted based on International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the outcome of undergoing reconstruction.

RESULTS

The weighted sample included encounters with 19,205 abdominoperineal resection patients, of whom 1243 (6.5 percent) received a flap. Notable patient-level predictors of receiving a flap included age younger than 55 years (OR, 1.82; 95 percent CI, 1.23 to 2.74; p = 0.003) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (OR, 1.37; 95 percent CI, 1.01 to 1.88; p = 0.041). Race, sex, income level, insurance type, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were not associated with increased odds of receiving a flap. For facility-level factors, urban teaching hospitals (OR, 23.6; 95 percent CI, 3.29 to 169.4; p = 0.002) and larger hospital bedsize (OR, 2.64; 95 percent CI, 1.53 to 4.56; p = 0.000) were associated with higher odds of reconstruction. Plastic surgery facility volume was not found to be a significant predictor of undergoing flap reconstruction (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection at academic centers were over 23 times more likely to undergo reconstruction, after adjusting for available confounders. Patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection at smaller, nonacademic centers may not have equitable access to reconstruction despite being appropriate candidates. Given the morbidity of abdominoperineal resection, patients should be referred to large, academic centers to have access to flap reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Inferior Part of Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Resection: A Case Series Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer is abdominoperineal resection (APR). Comparing to primary closure, immediate flap reconstruction has shown to have good outcomes. We aimed to assess the inferior rectus abdominis muscle flap complications after APR surgery, a new method of reconstruction.

METHODS

This study was conducted from 2014 to 2016 in a single center in Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eighteen patients who underwent pelvic floor closure with inferior part of abdominis rectus musculofascial flap were included enrolled. The sampling method used in this study was census. All patients had distal rectoanal malignancies. A checklist including age, gender, tumor location, complications after surgery, tumor type, length of hospital stay, length of operation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy history was filled for all patients.

RESULTS

Among 18 participants, 27.8% were female. The mean age of participants was 58.28 ± 17.86 yr (minimum of 19 and the maximum of 89 yr). The pathology of the tumor in all but one of the cases was adenocarcinoma (94.4%). The overall complication rate after surgery was 27.8%. In total, 80% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In 12 months follow-up 2 patients needed reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap was a reliable and comparable means of reconstruction after APR surgery with low rate of complications and mortality.

Central perforated VRAM flap and neurostimulated levator augmentation for functional and aesthetical reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision in cancer

BACKGROUND

Preservation of quality of life regarding fecal continence after abdominoperineal excision (APE) in cancer is challenging. Simultaneous soft tissue coverage and restoration of continence mechanism can be provided through an interdisciplinary collaboration of colorectal and plastic reconstructive surgery.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of surgical procedure and outcome combining soft tissue reconstruction using a central perforated vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM), implementing a perineostoma and restoring anorectal angle augmenting the levator ani by neurostimulated graciloplasty.

METHODS

14 Patients underwent APE due to cancer. In all patients coverage was achieved by pedicled VRAM and simultaneous pull-through descendostomy (perineostoma). 10 of those patients received a levator augmentation additionally. Postoperative complications, functional measures of continence as well as quality of life were obtained.

RESULTS

Perineal minor complication rate was 43% without need of surgical intervention. All but one VRAM survived. Continence measures and disease specific life quality showed a good preservation of continence in most patients.

CONCLUSION

The results present a complex therapy option accomplished by a collaboration of two highly specialized partners (visceral and plastic surgery) after total loss of the sphincter function and consecutive fecal insufficiency after APE.

How Big Is Too Big?: The Effect of Defect Size on Postoperative Complications of Vertical Rectus Abdominis Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap has been frequently used for perineal reconstruction given the high potential for wound complications associated with direct closure of this area. However, the relationship between defect size and postoperative complications remains undefined.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of the last 20 years for VRAM flaps was performed. Defect size, age, body mass index (BMI), cause of defect, sex, radiation, and flap donor laterality were recorded. Complications of infection, partial flap loss, total flap loss, minor wounds, treated nonoperatively, and major wound, which required reoperation, were analyzed with respect to defect size. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients. Associations were assessed using binary logistic regression analysis, and difference in means for compared groups was assessed using the independent samples t test. P values were set at 5% for all comparisons.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients with VRAM flaps identified during the review period. Mean defect size was 204.71 cm2. Mean age was 63.97, and mean BMI was 27.18. History of prior radiation was noted in 90.77% of patients (n = 59). When adjusted for age and BMI, mean defect area was significantly different for patients with minor or major wounds. Larger perineal defects were associated with increased risk of major wound complications (odds ratio, 1.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The vertical rectus abdominis flap has been a workhorse flap for perineal reconstruction. Defect size does not affect risk of partial flap necrosis, complete flap loss, infection, abdominal fascial dehiscence, ventral hernia, or seroma, which supports the utility of VRAM flap for perineal reconstruction. Larger perineal defects are associated with increased risk for major wound complications, which required reoperation, regardless of age or BMI. Future studies should be performed to determine if there is a maximum defect size cutoff that limits the utility of VRAM flap reconstruction or to develop a predictive model to assess the risk of major wound complications based on defect size.

Flap Reconstruction of Perineal Defects after Pelvic Exenteration: A Systematic Description of Four Choices of Surgical Reconstruction Methods

BACKGROUND

The treatment of locally advanced or recurrent anorectal cancer requires radical surgery such as extralevator abdominoperineal resection and pelvic exenteration. Larger defects require flap reconstruction. The authors evaluated outcomes of different perineal reconstruction techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting outcomes on perineal flap reconstruction in patients with anal or colorectal cancer were included. Data on patient characteristics, surgical details, perineal and donor-site complications, revision surgery, mortality, and quality of life were extracted. Articles were assessed using the Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

The authors included 58 mainly observational studies comprising 1988 patients. Seventy-three percent of patients had rectal cancer. The majority of 910 abdominoperineal resection patients underwent reconstruction with rectus abdominis flaps (91 percent). Dehiscence (15 to 32 percent) and wound infection (8 to 16 percent) were the most common complications. Partial flap necrosis occurred in 2 to 4 percent and flap loss occurred in 0 to 2 percent. Perineal herniation was seen in 6 percent after gluteal flap reconstruction and in 0 to 1 percent after other types of reconstruction. Donor-site complications were substantial but were reported inconsistently.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome data on perineal reconstruction after exenterative surgery are mostly of very low quality. Perineal reconstruction after pelvic exenteration is complex and requires a patient-tailored approach. Primary defect size, reconstruction aims, donor-site availability, and long-term morbidity should be taken into account. This review describes the clinical outcomes of four flap reconstruction techniques. Shared clinical decision-making on perineal reconstruction should be based on these present comprehensive data.

Redefining the Reconstructive Ladder in Vulvoperineal Reconstruction: The Role of Pedicled Perforator Flaps

BACKGROUND

 Gynecological reconstruction is difficult, particularly in cases with recurrence and received previous surgeries and/or radiotherapy and necessitate secondary reconstruction. Perforator flaps can preserve other donor sites for potential later reconstruction, and they also can be better tailored to the defect. We hypothesized that the use of perforator-based flaps can better restore the defect with less complications.

METHODS

 A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent vulvar-perineum reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 by the senior author, and oncologic and reconstructive outcomes and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

 Thirty-three patients underwent 55 soft tissue reconstructions for vulvar-perineum defects during the study period. The mean follow-up time was 27.6 ± 28.9 months. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common cancer (45.5%). For 11 patients (33.3%), the procedures were performed for the treatment of recurrent cancer. The average defect size was 39.8 ± 34.3 cm². The overall survival rate was 90.3%. Profunda artery perforator flaps were the most commonly applied flap for reconstruction in both the primary and recurrent groups. Poor wound healing was the most common complication which occurred in 10 of the 55 flaps (18.2%). Perforator flaps presented fewer complications than myocutaneous flaps or traditional random flaps. Similarly, Island pedicle flap design also presented fewer complications than traditional rotation flaps. With proper reconstruction, previous surgery or radiotherapy did not contribute to an increase in complications.

CONCLUSION

 In our experience, perforator flaps can provide satisfactory reconstruction for perineum reconstruction with low postoperative complications while preserving other donor sites in the event of disease recurrence for repeat resection and reconstruction. Previous surgery or radiotherapy did not increase the complications or preclude its usage. A redefined reconstructive ladder was created to help selecting the best state-of-the-art technique for reconstruction to achieve better results.

The Role of Autologous Flap Reconstruction in Patients with Crohn's Disease Undergoing Abdominoperineal Resection

BACKGROUND

Patients with symptomatic Crohn's disease who undergo abdominoperineal resection can experience impaired postoperative wound healing. This results in significant morbidity, burdensome dressing changes, and increased postoperative pain. When abdominoperineal resection is performed for oncological reasons, autologous flap reconstruction is occasionally performed to optimize wound healing and reconstruction outcomes. However, the role of flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for Crohn's disease has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the utility of flap reconstruction in patients with symptomatic Crohn's disease undergoing abdominoperineal resection. We hypothesize that patients with immediate flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection will demonstrate improved wound healing.

DESIGN

This study is a retrospective chart review.

SETTINGS

Eligible patients at our institution were identified from 2010 to 2018 by using a combination of Current Procedural Terminology, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes.

PATIENTS

Of 40 adult patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease, 20 underwent abdominoperineal resection only and 20 underwent abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction.

INTERVENTIONS

Immediate autologous flap reconstruction was performed after abdominoperineal resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the presence of postoperative perineal wounds and postoperative wound care burden.

RESULTS

Patients in the abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction group demonstrated significantly worse preoperative disease traits, including fistula burden, than patients in the abdominoperineal resection only group. A lower number of patients tended to be associated with a persistent perineal wound in the flap group at 30 days (abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction = 55% vs abdominoperineal resection only = 70%; p = 0.327) and at 6 months (abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction = 25% vs abdominoperineal resection only = 40%; p = 0.311) postoperatively. There was also a trend toward a lower incidence of complications in the flap group. Patients in the abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction group tended to experience lower postoperative pain than patients in the abdominoperineal resection only group.

LIMITATIONS

This retrospective cohort study was limited by its reliance on data in electronic medical records, and by its small sample size and the fact that it was a single-institution study.

CONCLUSIONS

In select patients who have severe perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease, there may be a benefit to immediate flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection to lower postoperative wound care burden without significant intraoperative or postoperative risk. In addition, flap reconstruction may lead to lower postoperative pain. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B416.

EL ROL DE LA RECONSTRUCCIN CON COLGAJO AUTLOGO EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN SOMETIDOS A RESECCIN ABDOMINOPERINEAL

ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn sintomática que se someten a una resección abdominoperineal pueden experimentar una curación posoperatoria deficiente de la herida. Esto da como resultado una morbilidad significativa, cambios de apósito molestos y un aumento del dolor posoperatorio. Cuando se realiza una resección abdominoperineal por razones oncológicas, ocasionalmente se realiza una reconstrucción con colgajo autólogo para optimizar los resultados de la curación y reconstrucción de la herida. Sin embargo, no se ha establecido la función de la reconstrucción con colgajo después de la resección abdominoperineal para la enfermedad de Crohn.OBJETIVO:Este estudio examina la utilidad de la reconstrucción con colgajo en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn sintomática sometidos a resección abdominoperineal. Presumimos que los pacientes con reconstrucción inmediata con colgajo después de la resección abdominoperineal demostrarán una mejor curación de la herida.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva de expedientes.MARCO:Los pacientes elegibles en nuestra institución se identificaron entre 2010 y 2018 mediante una combinación de los códigos de Terminología actual de procedimientos, Clasificación internacional de enfermedades 9 y Clasificación internacional de enfermedades 10.PACIENTES:Cuarenta pacientes adultos diagnosticados con enfermedad de Crohn que se someten a resección abdominoperineal solamente (APR-solo = 20) y resección abdominoperineal con reconstrucción con colgajo (APR-colgajo = 20).INTERVENCIÓN (ES):Reconstrucción inmediata con colgajo autólogo después de la resección abdominoperineal.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:Presencia de herida perineal posoperatoria y carga de cuidado de la herida posoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Los pacientes del grupo APR-colgajo demostraron rasgos de enfermedad preoperatoria significativamente peores, incluida la carga de la fístula, en comparación con los pacientes del grupo APR-solo. Un número menor de pacientes tendió a asociarse con una herida perineal persistente en el grupo de colgajo a los 30 días (APR-colgajo = 55% vs APR-solo = 70%; p = 0.327) y 6 meses (APR-colgajo = 25% vs APR-solo = 40%; p = 0.311) postoperatoriamente. También hubo una tendencia hacia una menor incidencia de complicaciones en el grupo APR-colgajo. Los pacientes del grupo APR-colgajo tendieron a experimentar menos dolor posoperatorio en comparación con el grupo APR-solo.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en datos de historias clínicas electrónicas. Tamaño de muestra pequeño y estudio de una sola institución.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes seleccionados que tienen enfermedad de Crohn fistulizante perianal grave, la reconstrucción inmediata del colgajo después de la resección abdominoperineal puede beneficiar a reducir la carga posoperatoria del cuidado de la herida sin riesgo intraoperatorio o posoperatorio significativo. Además, la reconstrucción con colgajo puede resultar un dolor posoperatorio menor. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B416.

Hospital volume is associated with cost and outcomes variation in 2,942 pelvic reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Complex pelvic reconstruction is challenging for plastic and reconstructive surgeons following surgical resection of the lower gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract. Complication rates and hospital costs are variable and may be linked to the hospital case volume of pelvic reconstructions performed. A comprehensive examination of these factors has yet to be performed.

METHODS

Data were retrieved for patients undergoing pedicled flap reconstruction after pelvic resections in the American National Inpatient Sample database between 2010 and 2014. Patients were then separated into three groups based on hospital case volume for pelvic reconstruction. Multivariate logistic regression and gamma regression with log-link function were used to analyze associations between hospital case volume, surgical outcomes, and cost.

RESULTS

In total, 2,942 patients underwent pelvic flap reconstruction with surgical complications occurring in 1,466 patients (49.8%). Total median cost was $38,469.40. Pelvic reconstructions performed at high-volume hospitals were significantly associated with fewer surgical complications (low: 51.4%, medium: 52.8%, high: 34.8%; p < 0.001) and increased costs (low: $35,645.14, medium: $38,714.92, high: $44,967.29; p < 0.001). After regression adjustment, high hospital volume was the strongest independently associated factor for decreased surgical complications (Exp[β], 0.454; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.346-0.596; p < 0.001) and increased hospital cost (Exp[β], 1.351; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.285-1.421; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing pelvic flap reconstruction after oncologic resections experience high complication rates. High case volume hospitals were independently associated with significantly fewer surgical complications but increased hospital costs. Reconstructive surgeons may approach these challenging patients with greater awareness of these associations to improve outcomes and address cost drivers.

A comparison of oncological outcomes after abdominoperineal excision before and after the implementation of a selective perineal flap closure program

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Abdominoperineal excision (APE) is the operation chosen when a patient has low rectal cancer unamenable to sphincter preserving surgery. Perineal flap reconstruction is associated with less wound morbidity but little is known about oncological outcomes. The objective was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing APE before and after the introduction of a program that utilized flap reconstruction of the perineum.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Patients who underwent APE followed by primary closure or flap reconstruction between 1998 and 2018 were selected. The cohorts were divided according to the implementation of the flap reconstruction program in July 2009. Clinicopathological data, recurrence and survival were compared between the cohorts.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty nine patients underwent APE for rectal adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2018. There were 57 patients in the pre-flap era and 92 in the post-flap era. Forty-six patients underwent flap reconstruction in the latter cohort (50%). More patients in the post-flap era underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (85.9% vs. 63.2%; p < .01). Margin positivity rates decreased from 21.1% in the pre-flap era to 10.9% in the post-flap era (p = .10) and there was an associated improvement in incidence and time to local recurrence (p = .03).

CONCLUSION

The use of perineal flap reconstruction is associated with a longer median time to local recurrence. Perineal flap reconstruction may contribute to reduced margin positivity.

Pelvic/Perineal Reconstruction: Time to Consider the Anterolateral Thigh Flap as a First-line Option?

Background:

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic exenteration continue to be common procedures for the treatment of colorectal malignancy. The workhorse flap for reconstruction in these instances has been the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. The associated donor site morbidity, however, cannot be ignored. Here, we provide a review of the literature and present the senior author’s (A.M.) experience using the pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap for reconstruction of soft tissue defects following APR and pelvic exenteration.

Methods:

Patients who underwent pelvic/perineal reconstruction with pedicled ALT flaps between 2017 and 2019 were included in the study. Parameters of interest included age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, history of radiation, extent of ablative surgery, and postoperative complication rate.

Results:

A total of 23 patients (16 men and 7 women) with a median age and body mass index of 66 years (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 49–71 years) and 24.9 kg/m² (IQR: 24.2–26.7 kg/m²) were included in the study, respectively. Thirteen (56.5%) patients presented with rectal cancer, 5 (21.7%) with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 4 (17.4%) with Crohn’s disease, and 1 (4.3%) with Paget’s disease. Nineteen patients (82.6%) received neoadjuvant radiation. Nine (39.1%) patients experienced 11 complications (2 major and 9 minor). The most common complication was partial perineal wound dehiscence (N = 6 [26.1%]). Stable soft tissue coverage was achieved in all but one patient.

Conclusions:

The ALT flap allows for stable soft tissue coverage following APR and pelvic exenteration without being associated with abdominal donor site morbidity. Consideration to its use as a first-line reconstructive option should be given in pelvic/perineal reconstruction.

Comparison of Effective Cost and Complications after Abdominoperineal Resection: Primary Closure versus Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Flap reconstruction is recommended for select patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection to mitigate complications. However, the clinical effectiveness and financial implications of flap reconstruction remain unknown. The authors aim to compare the costs and complications for patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection with and without flap reconstruction.

METHODS

The Truven MarketScan Databases (2009 to 2016) were used to perform retrospective population-based analysis of colorectal carcinoma patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection with and without flap reconstruction. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to study effective cost (cumulative cost/number of healthy days) and complications.

RESULTS

Of 2557 total abdominoperineal resection patients, 194 patients underwent flap reconstruction. Patients undergoing flap reconstruction had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p = 0.004) and were more likely to have local invasion (p < 0.001). At 6 months postoperatively, there were no differences in complications between the two groups (p = 0.116). Flap reconstruction was protective against intraabdominal infections (OR, 0.4; 95 percent CI, 0.2 to 0.9; p = 0.033) but conferred an increased risk of wound complications (OR, 1.5; 95 percent CI, 1.0 to 2.3; p = 0.039). Total median cost of care was similar (abdominoperineal resection alone, $40,050; abdominoperineal resection with flap, $41,380; p = 0.456). Effective cost was greater for abdominoperineal resection alone ($259/healthy day) than abdominoperineal resection with flap ($186/healthy day) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with flap reconstruction displayed a higher comorbidity score and more extensive disease, but these unfavorable factors did not result in a higher complication rate, total cost, or effective cost. Therefore, flap reconstruction for complex perineal defects confers a benefit in select patients and is a judicious use of health care resources.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap: A case report

Background: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is the standard surgical treatment for low-lying anorectal malignancies. It seems that immediate flap reconstruction has fewer complications compared to primary closure. There are several options for local flap reconstruction of perineal wound closure, and each specific flap method has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Case presentation: In this case report, a new method of reconstruction is presented which contains only the inferior part of the rectus abdominis muscle in 2 patients, one with unilateral and the other with bilateral involvement and they both underwent APR. Both patients were referred to the colorectal surgery clinic for APR by an oncologist. Both patients had severe constipation and both reported pain on defecation and rectorrhagia. Patient 1 received a unilateral inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap and patient 2 received a bilateral flap.

Conclusion: Immediate flap reconstruction after APR has fewer complications than primary closure and the inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap seems to be a possible means of reconstruction after APR.

Immediate Reconstruction After Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Cohort Analysis Through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Outcomes Review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common and fatal malignancies in the United States. When localized to the distal gastrointestinal tract, surgical therapy includes abdominoperineal resection (APR) or pelvic exenteration (PEX). Subsequent ablative defects are considerable, impart concerning morbidity, and often necessitate autologous reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative outcomes after reconstruction of APR and PEX defects.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2017) was queried for patients undergoing APR for lower gastrointestinal malignancies with concurrent autologous reconstructions. Cases of disseminated cancer were excluded. Postoperative adverse event profiles, including rates of wound and systemic complications, were evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and operative time was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

A total of 1309 patients were identified as undergoing APR/PEX with concomitant reconstruction. The majority (96.9%) of reconstructions consisted of muscle, myocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, or omental pedicled flaps. Of the cohort, 45.7% experienced at least 1 all-cause complication within 30-days of the procedure. Having a limited or moderate frailty (frailty index of "1" or "2") was identified as a predictor of all-cause complications [OR, 1.556; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.187-2.040, P = 0.001; and OR, 1.741; 95% CI, 1.193-2.541, P = 0.004, respectively], whereas smoking was a predictor of wound complications (OR, 1.462; 95% CI, 1.070-1.996, P = 0.017) and steroid use was a predictor of mild systemic complications (OR, 2.006; 95% CI, 1.058-3.805, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Anorectal cancer resection often necessitates reconstruction secondary to postexenteration perineal defects. The incidence of postoperative complications is relatively high, and several risk factors are identified to help refine patient optimization.

Reconstruction of Intrapelvic Defects Using the Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap: Expanding the Traditional Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of intrapelvic soft tissue defects traditionally relies on regional pedicled myocutaneous flaps. However, there remain situations in which local options are unavailable. We review our experience treating intrapelvic defects with the anterolateral thigh (ALT) microvascular free flap.

METHODS

A retrospective, institutional review was conducted from 2014 to 2018 of patients undergoing microvascular ALT flap reconstruction of intrapelvic defects. Four patients were identified in this cohort out of 92 total pelvic reconstruction cases.

RESULTS

All patients underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer treatment. In the two male patients, pelvic abscesses and bladder leak necessitated soft tissue reconstruction after radiation and APR. In both, regional tissue options were unavailable, and a buried ALT free flap was used for soft tissue reconstruction. Both female patients developed rectovaginal fistulas secondary to their tumor burden, necessitating posterior vaginal wall resections. Prior surgical scars and ostomies made abdominal wall tissue unavailable; thus, free ALTs were used to eliminate intrapelvic dead space and reconstruct the posterior vaginal wall. In all cases, recipient vessels were the deep inferior epigastric artery and vein. Flap survival was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic reconstruction has traditionally been addressed with local/regional pedicled flaps. In cases where these are unavailable, the free ALT flap is a versatile option when buried for intrapelvic reconstruction or posterior vaginal wall lining. We also propose updating Cordeiro et al.'s classic vaginal defect reconstruction algorithm to include the free ALT flap for type IB cases in which the rectus abdominis is unavailable.

Single centre experience of bilateral gracilis flap perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision

AIM

A variety of tissue flaps have been described for the closure of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APE) or exenteration for locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer and salvage surgery for anal cancer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the bilateral pedicled gracilis muscle flaps (BPGMFs) as a reconstruction option in these patients. This is of particular benefit when using a laparoscopic approach for the abdominal component of the operation, avoiding disruption of the abdominal wall and risk of herniation with other reconstruction options, e.g. vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps.

METHOD

This is a retrospective single centre case series of patients who underwent reconstruction of perineal defects using BPGMFs using a novel weave technique, from January 2008 to August 2017.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients (16 female), with a median follow-up of 19 months (3-102). The indications for BPGMFs were cancer resection (21) and perineal hernia (4). The median length of stay was 14 days (6-60). All-cause mortality was 36% within the follow-up period. A healed perineal wound was achieved in 72% of patients within 30 days (84% of patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The overall donor site complication rate was 20% (including infection, dehiscence, numbness, haematoma and seroma) and 28% for the perineal site (including infection, dehiscence and prolapse).

CONCLUSIONS

BPGMFs provide an important option for reconstruction of the perineum particularly with a minimally invasive approach or with two stomas.

Sarcopenia Is a Risk Factor for Infection for Patients Undergoing Abdominoperineal Resection and Flap-based Reconstruction

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) carries a high risk of morbidity. Preoperative risk assessment can help with patient counseling, minimize adverse outcomes, and guide surgeons in their choice of reconstruction. This study examined the impact of sarcopenia (low lean muscle mass) on postoperative complications after APR.

The adipofasciocutaneous gluteal fold perforator flap a versatile alternative choice for covering perineal defects

AIM

Perineal defects following the resection of anorectal malignancies are a reconstructive challenge. Flaps based on the rectus abdominis muscle have several drawbacks. Regional perforator flaps may be a suitable alternative. We present our experience of using the gluteal fold flap (GFF) for reconstructing perineal and pelvic defects.

METHODS

We used a retrospective chart review and follow-up examinations focusing on epidemiological, oncological (procedure and outcome), and therapy-related data. This included postoperative complications and their management, length of hospital stay, and time to heal.

RESULTS

Twenty-two GFFs (unilateral n = 8; bilateral n = 7) were performed in 15 patients (nine women and six men; anal squamous cell carcinoma n = 8; rectal adenocarcinoma n = 7; mean age 65.5 + 8.2 years) with a mean follow-up time of 1 year. Of the cases, 73.3% were a recurrent disease. Microscopic tumor resection was achieved in all but one case (93.3%). Seven cases had no complications (46.7%). Surgical complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system (grades I n = 2; II n = 2; IIIb n = 4). These were mainly wound healing disorders that did not affect mobilization or discharge. The time to discharge was 22 + 9.9 days. The oncological outcomes were as follows: 53.3% of the patients had no evidence of disease, 20% had metastatic disease, 20% had local recurrent disease, and one patient (6.7%) died of other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

The GFF is a robust, reliable flap suitable for perineal and pelvic reconstruction. It can be raised quickly and easily, has an acceptable complication rate and donor site morbidity, and does not affect the abdominal wall.

Primary vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following abdominoperineal resection for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection (APR) have become a major clinical challenge. Myocutaneous flap closure has been proposed in place of primary closure to improve wound healing. We conducted this comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the current scientific evidence of primary closure vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following APR for colorectal disease.

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases to identify all relevant studies. After data extraction from the included studies, meta-analysis was performed to compare perioperative outcomes of primary closure and myocutaneous flap closure.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with a total of 17 913 patients (16 346 primary closure vs 1567 myocutaneous flap closure) were included. We found that primary closure was significantly associated with higher total perineal wound complications (P = 0.007), major perineal wound complications (P < 0.001) and perineal wound infection (P = 0.001). On the other hand, myocutaneous flap closure takes more operation time (P < 0.001) and increases the risk of perineal wound dehiscence (P = 0.01), deep surgical site infection (P < 0.001), enterocutaneous fistulas (P = 0.03) and return to the operating room (P = 0.0005). There were no significant differences between the two groups for other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review with meta-analysis comparing primary closure with myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects after APR for colorectal disease. Although taking more operation time and an increased risk of specific complications, the pooled results have validated the use of myocutaneous flaps for reducing total/major perineal wound complications. More investigations are needed to draw definitive conclusions on this dilemma.

Immediate Perineal Reconstruction After Extralevatory Abdominoperineal Excision: Buried Desepidermised Fasciocutaneous V-Y Advancement Flap

BACKGROUND

According to National Cancer Institute, there are approximately 39,800 rectal cancer cases per year, 25% of which will need an abdominoperineal resection (APR). The key to avoid most of the complications related to pelvic defect that occurs after APR is choosing an appropriate reconstruction option for perineum. This study aims to introduce an easily applicable flap option for closure to address postoperative pelvic defect in low rectal cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective evaluation of 9 patients who have undergone perineal reconstruction for pelvic defects after extralevatory abdominoperineal excision with rectal cancer between 2014 and 2016. Reconstruction consists of a novel technique defined by our clinic, which is buried desepidermised fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap.

RESULTS

All defects are closed successfully. Patients are followed postoperatively for complications such as perineal infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, perineal sinus, or fistula formation. Flaps are evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging postoperatively, for viability and effectiveness on defect closure. Mean follow-up time is 20 (±9) months. Mean average hospital stay is 8 (±2) days. We did not experience any total or partial flap loss or encounter any local complication related to the wound.

CONCLUSIONS

Buried desepidermised fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap is a reasonably easy and time-saving operation. It is effective in filling the pelvic dead space while closing the sacral defect after APR and therefore decreases late term complications related to large perineal excision.

Risk factors for wound complications after abdominoperineal excision: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database

AIM

The perineal wound following abdominoperineal excision (APR) is associated with a high complication rate. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for wound complications and examine the effect of flap reconstruction on wound healing.

METHOD

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was searched for patients who underwent APR for rectal adenocarcinoma. They were divided into two groups: primary closure of the perineal wound and flap reconstruction. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for deep surgical site infection (SSI) and wound dehiscence.

RESULTS

A total of 8449 (94%) patients from the database underwent primary closure and 550 (6%) underwent flap reconstruction. Patients who underwent flap reconstruction had a longer operation time, a higher incidence of deep SSI, wound dehiscence, more blood transfusion requirement and a higher rate of return to the operating room (all P < 0.001). Risk factors for deep SSI were African American race (OR 1.5, P = 0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4 (OR 3.2, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m(2) (OR 1.7, P = 0.006), weight loss (OR 2, P < 0.001) and closure with a flap (OR 1.9, P < 0.001). Risk factors for wound dehiscence included ASA classification ≥ 4 (OR 2.2, P = 0.003), history of smoking (OR 2.2, P < 0.001), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.7, P = 0.03), BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2) (OR 1.9, P = 0.001) and closure with a flap (OR 2.9, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Perineal wound complications are related to a patient's race, ASA classification, smoking, obesity and weight loss. Compared with primary closure, closure with a flap was associated with higher odds of wound infection and dehiscence and was not protective of wound complications in the presence of other risk factors. Therefore optimizing the patient's medical condition will lead to a better outcome irrespective of the technique used for perineal wound closure.

Abdominoperineal resection and perineal wound healing in recurrent, persistent, or primary anal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for squamous cell anal cancer. Salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) is usually reserved for patients presenting with recurrent or persistent disease. Aim of our study was to review the outcomes of salvage surgery and perineal wound healing with or without a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap in a single institution over a 6-year period.

METHODS

Data of all patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell anal cancer treated with chemoradiation at the University Medical Center Mannheim were recorded prospectively. Medical records of all patients who underwent salvage surgery for anal carcinoma between June 2008 and June 2014 were reviewed with regard to surgical and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients received chemoradiation with a 5-year overall survival of 79 %. Seventeen patients required (salvage) APR for recurrent (n = 8), persistent (n = 7), or primary anal carcinoma (n = 2). Median overall survival was 33.4 months. Median duration until completion of perineal wound healing was shorter in the VRAM group (17 vs. 24.5 weeks; p = 0.0541).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage APR has a reasonable chance of long-time survival. Perineal reconstruction with a VRAM flap may reduce the duration until completion of perineal wound healing.