Efficacy of Ear Molding in Infants using the EarWell Infant Correction System and Factors Affecting Outcome

Efficiency of ear molding for treating constricted ears of different severity

PURPOSE

To investigate the treatment time and efficiency of constricted ears of different severity after correction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included the patients with constricted ear presented to our hospital for treatment between December 2021 and December 2023 in this retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into class I, II and III groups based on the severity of the constriction. Then we collected the data on classification of severity from each patient, together with sex, family history, age at initial correction, being informed upon diagnosis after birth, as well as utilization of auricle correction system. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the treatment time and efficiency.

RESULTS

The correction system yielded a high effective rate in the constricted ears. The treatment time in class II was significantly longer compared with those of class I after adjusting these parameters. Compared with the cases of class I, those with a class III showed significant attenuation in the symptoms and conditions (95 % CI: 0.034, 0.365; P < 0.001), after adjusting the age at initial correction, being informed upon diagnosis after birth, and utilization of auricle correction system. There were no statistical differences between class II and III in the treatment efficiency after correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The Amazing Ear Correction System was effective in treating constricted ear, yielding satisfactory treatment efficiency. Patients with class II constriction required longer treatment time compared with those of class I. The treatment outcome in the class I constriction was better than that of class III.

Ear Molding in Children-Timing, Technique, and Follow-up: A Systematic Review

Background: Nonsurgical management of congenital ear anomalies using molding devices shows efficacy but lacks standardization of treatment protocols and outcome measures. Learning Objective: To compare ear molding techniques and identify factors related to treatment outcomes. Design Type: Systematic review of the literature (1990-2021). Methods: Studies reporting molding for congenital ear anomalies were assessed. PRISMA guidelines were used. Data extracted included: age at treatment initiation, treatment duration, correction rates, and complications. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and outcomes were compared using the Student t-test. Results: In total, 37 studies with 3,341 patients (mean patients per study, 95; range, 5-488) were included. Infants in whom treatment was initiated at 4.8 weeks (median, 3.7; range, 0.9-8.8 weeks) were treated for 5.1 weeks (median 4.7, range 2.6-7.6 weeks) with 11.0 months follow-up (median 11.4, range 1.4-21.0 months). Individualized devices (physician-customized) were used more (62.2% of studies) than commercial devices. No difference in correction (p = 0.44) or complication rates (p = 0.19) was identified between devices. Totally, 70.3% of studies reported complications and 40.5% of studies included long-term follow-up data. Conclusions: The available evidence supports initiating ear molding in the first weeks of life to be most effective, yet outcome data should be standardized in future studies to improve evidence quality.

Early Non-Surgical Treatment For Microtia Types 1 and 2

Esthetic concerns and psychosocial distress often accompany auricular deformities and malformations in both children and their parents. Approximately 30% of newborns are affected by auricular anomalies, with 15% to 20% resulting in permanent defects. While surgical intervention is typically considered the gold standard for malformations, a non-surgical approach, such as splinting, molding, or other non-invasive techniques, can effectively address deformations if promptly administered by a specialist. Microtia, classified into 4 types, presents challenges ranging from fundamental structural anomalies in types 1 and 2 to severe defects in type 3 and complete absence of the external ear in type 4 (anotia). This study introduces a novel non-invasive treatment modality for microtia types 1 and 2. The cohort consisted of 5 newborns treated for microtia types 1 or 2 between 2022 and 2023. Utilizing the EarWell system, treatment was initiated before 3 weeks of age (mean age: 2 weeks), with an average treatment duration of 6.6 weeks, supplemented by molding treatment as needed. Minor adverse effects, such as simple dermatitis, were observed in 2 patients. All parents expressed high satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes, with 60% reporting extreme satisfaction. The prompt initiation of the treatment protocol for microtia types 1 and 2 led to outstanding and timely outcomes in infants, enhancing the quality of life for both parents and their children. Early intervention for subsequent treatment may improve the condition and, in certain cases, serve as a satisfactory alternative for parents hesitant about further surgical intervention for their children.

Customized Orthosis for Nonsurgical Correction of Congenital Auricle Deformities in Newborns

SUMMARY

A misshaped pinna, caused by extrinsic pressures such as birth canal extrusion or incorrect position, is a common congenital auricular deformity in newborns. Surgery is a routine option to address this deformity, but it is traumatic and may lead to unacceptable aesthetic outcomes. Commercial ear mold orthoses with uniform size have been used for nonsurgical orthotic treatment, but are not applicable in all cases, depending on the auricle morphology. The authors used computer-aided design and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to develop a novel customized orthosis for congenital auricular deformities. 3D ear models were constructed using computer-aided design software and a novel customized orthosis model was established after a process of correction, adjustment, and construction, with precise matching to allow tight attachment to the outer ear free from uneven skin pressing. After 3D-printing a customized orthosis injection mold, medical silicone injection molding was used to produce customized orthoses. Clinical application was conducted in 3 newborns and achieved satisfactory results. This novel customized auricle orthosis is an effective option for nonsurgical correction of a misshaped pinna.

A Study on the Nonsurgical Correction Treatment Age Window and Long-Term Follow-Up of Infants With Congenital Ear Anomalies in China

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of ear molding across various initial ages and analyze challenges encountered by infants beyond the optimal treatment age window.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 331 infants (527 ears) treated with EarWell was conducted over 5 years from January 2017 to March 2022 at a single center. The treatment duration of the ear molding, success rate, recurrence rate, and complication rate were analyzed among the 3 age groups. Concentrate on evaluating treatment outcomes for infants with an initial age exceeding 42 days.

RESULTS

The mean age at initial treatment was 25±28 days. In addition, it includes a child with cryptotia who is 3.5 years old (1278 d). The mean duration of treatment was 7±5 weeks. In the long-term follow-up, the overall treatment success rate was 92%, with 467 ears (88.6%) showing improvement without recurrence, 30 ears (5.7%) experiencing varying degrees of recurrence, and 30 ears (5.7%) showing no improvement or complete recurrence. A total of 20 infants (3%) developed mild skin complications during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Ear molding is a safe and effective option for the treatment of congenital ear anomalies, with a low recurrence rate during long-term follow-up. For infants with congenital auricular anomalies aged over 42 days, ear molding remains a viable option. Treatment success may be influenced by the age at treatment, the subtype of anomalies, and relies on the assessment of a specialized otologist, expert procedural techniques, as well as thorough understanding and cooperation from parents.

Ear Molding Therapy of Congenital Ear Anomalies: Long-Term Aesthetic Outcomes and Caretaker Satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

Ear molding is a safe, non-surgical approach to treat newborns with congenital ear anomalies. In this study, we aimed to investigate long-term aesthetic outcomes and caretaker satisfaction from ear molding therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review from 2018 to 2020 was conducted for infants who underwent ear molding treatment at our institution. Patient demographics and treatment related variables were collected. Caretakers were surveyed regarding their experience, expectations, and aesthetic outcome at 1 year (short-term) and 3 years (long-term) from treatment. Independent physicians evaluated treatment efficacy. Responses were converted to a Likert scale (1-5), with 5 representing most desirable.

RESULTS

Overall, 38 of 42 patients participated in our long-term study (90%) for a total of 62 ears. Average follow-up was 3.31 ± 0.50 years after completion of treatment. Mean age at treatment was 23.2 ± 19.7 days with a mean treatment duration of 21.7 ± 7.7 days. Caretakers' satisfaction regarding auricular appearance remained high (short-term: 4.18 vs. long-term: 4.17, p = 0.54) and anticipated social distress decreased over time. Physician aesthetic evaluations were favorable between "somewhat effective" and "very effective" and remained consistent over time (short term: 3.46 vs. long-term: 3.31, p = 0.31). Furthermore, physician evaluations were higher for deformations than malformations (p = 0.04) and in children who began treatment by 30 days old (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Caretaker satisfaction from ear molding therapy remained high after long-term follow up, and social distress from the perception of their child's ears decreased with time. Physician aesthetic ratings confirmed efficacy, with better outcomes seen in deformations than in malformations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Correction of congenital auricle deformities with ear mould: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of ear moulds for congenital auricle deformities.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) and Web of Science were systematically reviewed. Randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-randomised control trials (non-RCT), quasi-randomised control trials (quasi-RCT) and self-controlled before-after trials were also included. Data extraction was independently conducted by two authors. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBIN-I) was used to evaluate the risk bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and chi-square tests. Effective rate, adverse reaction rate and their 95%CI were calculated. Funnel plots, Begg's test as well as sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The analysis encompassed ten studies, comprising one RCT and nine self-controlled before-after trials, involving 1860 ears (1248 children). The pooled effective rate and adverse reaction rate of ear mould were 91% (95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and 9% (95%CI: 0.02-0.17), respectively. No serious adverse reactions were reported. The effective rate of ear mould intervention showed no significant difference between age at correction≤42 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >42 days group (93%, 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the correction efficiency between duration of wearing ear mould≤30 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >30 days group (92%, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96). The effective rate for correcting cryptotia ear (98%, P < 0.001), cup ear (93%, P = 0.004) and prominent ear (90%, P = 0.014) was higher than that of helical rim deformity (66%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, the use of ear moulds is effective and safe in correcting congenital auricle deformities. Notably, the correction efficacy for cryptotia, cup ear and prominent ear deformities surpasses that of helical rim deformities. However, further research is required to ascertain the impact of the duration of wearing on the correction of congenital auricle deformities.

Pediatric Otoplasty and Auricular Molding

With the advent of widespread use of commercial ear molding products, the literature addressing the indications for and timing of perinatal intervention in auricular deformations and malformations has increased significantly. Although the rationale for perinatal ear molding seems to be hormonally mediated, the common assertion that breastfeeding may prolong the window of effective intervention remains without convincing evidence. The common auricular anomalies as well as indications, timing, and methodology of effective intervention including ear molding or surgical otoplasty are reviewed herein.

Seminars in Plastic Surgery: Pediatric Ear Anomalies and Reconstruction

Congenital ear anomalies affect 15 to 20% of neonates and can be categorized as either auricular deformations or malformations. Deformations involve a fully developed, albeit abnormally shaped, chondrocutaneous framework, which makes them amenable to correction with ear molding within the first few months of life. Malformations involve hypoplastic or fully absent auricular structures that require augmentation with alloplastic and/or autogenous reconstruction. The goal of this article is to outline the various auricular deformities and malformations, followed by a description of the latest clinical management options, both nonsurgical and surgical, by auricular anomaly.

The Treatment Effect of Non-Surgical Ear Molding Correction in Children with Mild Cryptotia Deformity

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the treatment effect of non-surgical ear molding correction in children with mild cryptotia deformity.

METHODS

51 cases were collected from 2016 to 2021. They were divided into four groups (6 months-1 year group, 1-3 years group, 3-6 years group, and ≥6 years group). The effective rate, recurrence rate, complication rate, and treatment duration of non-surgical ear molding correction were analyzed among the four groups.

RESULTS

3 months after the end of corrective treatment, the overall effective rate was 92.2% (47/51), the overall recurrence rate was 7.8% (4/51), and there was statistical significance among the four groups (p = 0.001). The overall complication rate was 2.0% (1/51), and there was no statistical significance among the four groups (p = 1.000). There was statistical significance in the treatment duration among the four groups (p < 0.001), and the mean duration of treatment was positively correlated with the age at treatment (p < 0.001, R = 0.614).

CONCLUSIONS

We first propose and recommend that the treatment time window for non-surgical ear molding correction be maximally extended to 6 years old in children with mild cryptotia deformity. There is a high success rate of non-surgical ear molding correction in children with mild cryptotia deformity. The complication rate is low. There is a positive correlation between the mean treatment duration and the age at treatment, and the treatment duration increases with the growth of months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2122-2128, 2023.

A Retrospective Review of Outcomes and Complications after Infant Ear Molding at a Single Institution

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and complications associated with infant ear molding at a single institution.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all infants who underwent ear molding using the EarWell Infant Ear Correction System with pediatric plastic surgery from October 2010 to March 2021. Types of ear anomalies, age at initiation, duration of treatment, gaps in treatment, comorbidities, and complications were extracted for included patients. The primary outcomes assessed were degree of ear anomaly correction and incidence of skin complications. Parents were also sent a questionnaire regarding their long-term satisfaction with the ear molding treatment process.

Results

A total of 184 ears of 114 patients meeting inclusion criteria were treated during the study period. Mean age at treatment initiation was 21 days, and average duration of treatment was 40 days. Helical rim deformities (N = 50 ears) and lop ear (N = 40 ears) were the most common anomalies. A total of 181 ears (98.4%) achieved either a complete (N = 125 ears, 67.9%) or partial correction (N = 56 ears, 30.4%). The most common complications were eczematous dermatitis (N = 27 occurrences among 25 ears, 13.6%) and pressure ulcers (N = 23 occurrences among 21 ears, 12.5%). Infants who experienced a complication were 3.36 times more likely to achieve partial relative to complete correction (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 1.66-6.81).

Conclusion

Ear molding is an effective treatment strategy for infant ear anomalies, with most patients achieving complete correction.

Ear Molding for Congenital Auricular Deformities: Efficacy and Factors Affecting Outcomes

Objective: This study's aim was to assess the effectiveness of ear molding for congenital auricular deformities, analyze the factors affecting prognosis, and provide more clinical data supporting nonsurgical correction for this condition. Methods: A prospective study of a consecutive series of infants treated with ear molding from January 2021 to December 2022 in the department of otolaryngology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, was conducted. Demographic and clinical information were collected, and photographs of the ear were taken before and after treatment. Treatment efficacy and the relevant influencing factors were evaluated. Results: Thirty-five patients, including 59 with congenital ear anomalies, underwent noninvasive ear molding. The deformity type, treatment initiation age, and number of treatment cycles affected treatment efficacy. Earlier treatment initiation was associated with a shorter treatment period. Treatments were started earlier if decision-makers were more anxious. Conclusion: The earlier the neonatal auricle deformity is treated, the shorter the treatment time and the more ideal the clinical effect will be. Early noninvasive treatment for microtia is valuable. Early detection and parental awareness and education can help children receive treatment earlier and improve the success rate.

One-Year Outcomes of Ear Molding for Infants with Constricted Ear

BACKGROUND

Ear molding is a noninvasive treatment that shows promising results for neonatal ear deformations. Little research has been reported evaluating 1-year outcomes or relapse after ear molding for ear malformations.

METHODS

One-year molding efficacy for constricted ear, a common malformation that affects the aesthetic appearance of the auricle, was assessed during a single-center, prospective study conducted over a 3-year period (from May of 2017 to April of 2020). Infants with constricted ears were recruited and treated with the EarWell Infant Ear Correction System. Constricted ear classification, age at treatment application, duration of treatment, complications, and parental satisfaction were analyzed. Photographic documentation of the ears was performed before treatment, at treatment termination, and 12 months after treatment to evaluate treatment efficacy and relapse.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with 91 constricted ears were recruited. The EarWell Infant Ear Correction System was initiated before 2 weeks of age for 75.0% of these patients. Successful correction was achieved in 85.8% of patients. Early molding initiation (before 14 days of age) resulted in a significantly higher success rate ( P = 0.017). Class 1 and class 2 deformities achieved better outcomes than class 3 deformities ( P = 0.001). Among the 91 auricles, 37 ears (40.7%) relapsed: 36.3% had mild relapse, 4.4% had moderate relapse, and 0% had severe relapse. The treatment duration for patients with relapse was shorter than for patients without relapse ( P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Early ear molding is an effective treatment for constricted ear. Sufficient molding duration and consolidation periods are crucial in maintaining treatment effects.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Comparison of two conchal formers for nonsurgical correction on Conchal Crus

Objectives

Conchal Crus is a kind of congenital auricular deformation which is often overlooked. Few studies reported a large number of cases. We compared the efficacy of EarWell and self-made conchal formers on Conchal Crus to summarize our experience of correction and to find out the influencing factors.

Methods

Two groups of Conchal Crus babies underwent conchal correction with the EarWell and self-made conchal formers respectively. The combined auricular deformities in these babies were corrected with EarWell Infant Ear Correction System. Conchal Crus deformity was classified as severe and mild. Auricular and conchal morphologic outcomes were graded as excellent, good, and poor.

Results

The auricular morphologic results were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the effective (excellent plus good) rate between the two groups, but the excellent rate for conchal results in the Self-made group was significantly higher than that in the EarWell group. The former incidence of pressure ulcers was significantly lower than the latter. Multinomial regression analysis showed that the more severe conchal deformity was, the less likely the conchal shape tended to be improved.

Conclusion

Both conchal formers could correct Conchal Crus effectively. The self-made conchal former could make more excellent conchal fossae and lead to less pressure ulcers at the Conchal Crus. The degree of Conchal Crus deformity was an important influencing factor in the conchal correction outcome.

Level of evidence

4.

Efficacy of Classic Ear Molding for Neonatal Ear Deformity: Case Series and Literature Review

Background: We analyzed an original case series of the classic ear-molding method and evaluated the efficacy and complication rate of the method compared to commercial ear-molding products by meta-analysis to draw conclusions on the efficacy of the classic method. Methods: From January 2019 to March 2022, we selected patients who underwent classic ear molding for newborn ear deformities at our institution and reviewed the patient age, treatment time, efficiency and complications. Additionally, the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched, and meta-analysis (following the PRISMA guidelines) was performed. Results: In the case study, the success rate (excellent and good outcomes) of the classic ear-molding method was 92.6%. The mean age at application and mean duration of application were 5.81 ± 6.09 days and 32.13 ± 7.90 days, respectively. In the systematic review, the classic method group showed a statistically smaller success rate (proportion of 0.79) and statistically smaller complication rate (proportion of 0.05) than the commercial product group (proportion of 0.83). Conclusions: Compared with commercial products, classic ear molding has remarkable and comparable therapeutic effects on neonatal auricular deformities. Additionally, the classic ear-molding method is more suitable for infants with auricular deformities from socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Thus, the classic ear-molding method could be a better option for congenital ear anomalies than commercial ear-molding products.

Treatment of congenital auricle malformation with EarWell Ear Correction Kit: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of EarWell Ear Correction Kit in the treatment of congenital auricle malformation and the incidence of complications are not particularly clear, so we carried out this study to provide a better reference for plastic surgeons to use EarWell Ear Correction Kit in the treatment of congenital auricle malformation.

METHODS

We searched the Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP information databases.

RESULTS

Through this meta-analysis, we found that the effective rate of EarWell Ear Correction Kit was 89.1%. The incidence of complications using EarWell Ear Correction Kit for correction of congenital auricular deformity was 11.4%. In terms of complications, the incidence of skin lesions was 9% and the incidence of dermatitis was 3.4%.

CONCLUSION

EarWell Ear Correction Kit has high efficiency in the correction of congenital auricular deformity and a low incidence of complications. It can be used for the treatment of congenital auricular deformity in patients within 6 months of birth.

Noninvasive ear molding in the correction of ear anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ear molding has been used for the treatment of congenital external ear anomalies. The purpose of this study is to systematically review ear molding therapy and perform a meta-analysis to determine its efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed and Embase databases from January 2009 to April 2021 were searched. Individual studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated noninvasive ear molding for congenital ear anomalies, featured at least 50 ears, and were published in English.

RESULTS

15 studies (one RCT and 14 clinical series) with a total of 1729 children undergoing molding of 2508 ears were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the eight studies with reported success rates as determined by clinician assessment showed an overall success rate in 87.4% of ears. Meta-analysis of the three studies with reported efficacy as assessed by laypersons showed an overall success rate of 92%. All studies reported a variety of minor skin-related complications in the ear, such as eczema, excoriation, infection, irritation, rash (allergic or nonallergic), and ulceration. Generally, complications were not reported to be serious and were noted to resolve with minimal to no intervention.

CONCLUSION

To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest modern systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the efficacy of ear molding. A review of the 15 studies included suggests that ear molding is an effective and safe treatment for congenital ear anomalies with a high success rate. However, the strength of this body of evidence is reduced by a lack of comparative studies, heterogeneous patient populations, treatment protocols, and ear assessment scales.

Evolution of Anomaly-Specific Techniques in Infant Ear Molding: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Congenital ear anomalies occur in at least one-third of the population, and less than one-third of cases self-correct. Ear molding is a nonoperative alternative to surgery that spares operative morbidity and allows for significantly earlier intervention. In this retrospective study, the senior author developed a tailored approach to each specific type of ear deformity. The use of modifications to adapt standard ear molding techniques for each unique ear are described.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective, institutional review board-approved study of 246 patients who underwent ear molding by a single surgeon. The procedure reports for each case were reviewed to develop step-wise customization protocols for existing EarWellTM and InfantEarTM systems.

RESULTS

This review included 385 ears in 246 patients. Patient age at presentation ranged from less than 1 week to 22 weeks. Presenting ear deformities were subclassified into mixed (37.4%), helical rim (28.5%), prominent (10.6%), lidding/lop (9.3%), Stahl's ear (3.6%), conchal crus (3.3%), and cupping (2.8%). Two patients (0.8%) had cryptotia. Deformity subclass could not be obtained for 11 patients (4.5%). Recommended modifications to existing ear correction systems are deformity-specific: cotton tip applicator (CTA)/setting material (Stahl's ear), custom dental compound mold (lidding/lop and cupping), scaphal wire (helical rim), CTA/protrusion excision (prominent), and custom dental compound stent (conchal crus).

CONCLUSIONS

Presentation of ear anomalies is heterogenous. This ten-year experience demonstrates that the approach to ear molding should be dynamic and customized, using techniques beyond those listed in system manuals to complement each ear and to improve outcomes.

Non-Surgical Correction of Congenital Ear Anomalies: A Critical Assessment of Caretaker Burdens and Aesthetic Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Congenital ear anomalies result from cartilage and skin compression in utero. They can be corrected in infancy before the cartilage hardens and loses its malleability. Caretaker burden of ear molding and its impact on esthetic outcomes has not been studied.

METHODS

Demographic and procedural variables were retrospectively collected for infants who underwent ear molding. Parents were surveyed regarding their experience, caretaker burden, and esthetic outcome. Outside physicians were provided with pre- and post-treatment photographs and asked to rate outcomes. A Likert scale was developed for responses and converted to a numeric score from 1 to 5 with 5 as the most desirable.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients comprising 121 ears were included. Mean age at treatment was 20.1 ± 21.4 days with treatment duration of 21.1 ± 7.7 days. Parental participation in the survey was 70.1%. Questions that queried parents' experiences revealed a "very positive" experience with minor burden related to bathing and cleaning (Mean Likert Score 4.1, Range 1-5). Favorable parent-reported outcomes were obtained regarding anticipated social distress (4.28, 1-5), satisfaction with results (4.27, 1-5), and perception of final appearance (4.18, 1-5). Physician assessments of esthetic outcomes were slightly lower, but favorable between "somewhat effective" and "very effective" (3.46, 1-5). Earlier treatment trended favorably, but did not reach significance. Ear malformations had higher parent-reported satisfaction than ear deformations (4.75 ± 0.46 vs 4.21 ± 1.25, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Despite the additional obligation for new parents, infant ear molding is rated low in terms of caretaker burden. Esthetic outcomes are excellent as assessed by parents and physicians. However, caretakers reported higher esthetic outcomes than physician evaluations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Nonsurgical Treatment for Congenital Auricular Deformities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of non-surgical correction for congenital auricular deformities (CADs) remain unclear owing to a lack of high-level evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall success and complication rates of the non-surgical correction for CAD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The pooled success and complication rates of non-surgical correction were estimated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the success rates between patients treated with splints and molding systems, between those younger and older than 6-weeks, and among those with different types of CADs.

RESULTS

The review yielded 14 studies. The pooled success rate of non-surgical treatment was 93% (95% CI: 88%-97%). The success rates with splints and commercialized molding systems were 94% and 92%, respectively. The success rate was higher if non-surgical correction was initiated before age 6 weeks (96% vs. 82%). Prominent ears showed a lower success rate (85%) than other types of CADs (all > 90%). The pooled complication rate was 18% (95% CI: 10%-29%). Complications, including skin wound, irritation, and rash, were mild and easily treatable.

CONCLUSION

The non-surgical correction of CADs is highly effective and safe. Splints and molding systems offer similar effectiveness. Non-surgical correction is more beneficial if applied within 6 weeks of birth. Prominent ears have a lower, but still acceptable, success rate compared to other types of CAD. We recommend the early use of non-surgical correction to achieve favorable outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nonsurgical molding of congenital auricular deformities and analysis of the correction outcomes: A single-center, retrospective study in east China

OBJECTIVE

Our research was carried out to provide a clinical reference for the application of nonsurgical therapy in newborns with congenital auricular deformities in east China.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive newborns using noninvasive ear molding was conducted in Hangzhou in east China's Zhejiang Province. The demographic and clinical information and photographs of the ear before and after treatment were taken. The diagnosis of each auricular deformity was identified, and the treatment outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients including 356 congenital ear anomalies received noninvasive ear molding. The median age of infants to initiate treatment was 39.5 days. The median treatment duration was 42.5 days. The median follow-up time was 137.0 days. The overall treatment effective rate of all infants with nonoperative ear molding was 92.1%, and mild skin irritation and ulceration occurred in 34 ear deformities (9.6%). It confirmed that the treatment efficiency was satisfactory and the complication rate was still acceptable despite the late initiation treatment of neonates in east China. Further analysis of treatment outcomes among three subgroups of infants (the ages to initiate the ear molding were respectively less than or equal to 28, 29-56, and more than 57 days) revealed that initiation treatment was significantly related to the treatment results and the earlier the initiation treatment, the higher the effective rate and the lower the complication incidence.

CONCLUSION

Our study hints that newborns in east China may have a longer period for correction. What is more, although our study affirmed a longer period for noninvasive molding, early diagnosis and treatment are still recommended to improve therapy efficiency and reduce treatment duration and complications.

Using ear molding to correct auricular helix adhesion deformity

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the effectiveness of Byrd's EarWell system for the treatment of auricular helix adhesion.

METHODS

The newborns with helix adhesion were treated with ear molding. The photos of pinna were taken before, during, and after the treatment. The immediate and long-term outcomes, as well as the complications, were assessed by two independent plastic surgeons.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study. Data on family history, neonatal weight, gestational age, delivery method, laterality, gender, age of initiating treatment, medical comorbidities, duration of treatment, and follow-up time were collected.

STUDY SITE AND PERIOD

From 2019 to 2021, infants treated with the EarWell System in the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 46 newborns (66 ears) with helix adhesion were included. The average onset time of treatment was 4.57 ± 3.63 weeks. The average duration of treatment was 7.40 ± 2.05 weeks. 97.0% ears' (64/66) immediate results were excellent or good. During long-term follow-up, 95.5% ears achieved excellent or good outcomes. Age of initiation treatment significantly affected immediate (p = 0.001) and long-term (p = 0.004) outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

EarWell System was an effective method to correct auricular helix adhesion. Using this approach, patients with helix adhesion could avoid surgeries. Age of initiation treatment was the predictor of successful correction.

The Outward Curved Concha, an Unfamiliar Congenital Auricular Deformation: A Novel Protocol for Nonsurgical Management

ABSTRACT

Anomalies present in about 30% of newborn ears; 15% to 20% of them are permanent. Malformations can be treated solely surgically; however, deformations, when promptly diagnosed, can be treated with nonsurgical methods, such as splinting and molding. The deformity of an outward curved concha is not only an aesthetic issue, but may confer functional problems that impair hearing and hearing aid usage. The goal of this report was to present this unique anomaly and our novel noninvasive treatment protocol for its management. Our cohort comprised 10 newborns treated for outward curved concha during 2018 and 2019. The patients underwent nonsurgical treatment using the EarWell system. In some patients, the management was followed by molding and taping to achieve the best effect. Treatment for all the patients began before age 3 weeks (mean, 2 weeks). Treatment duration was 5.2 weeks, on average. Nine patients did not show any adverse effects. The majority of parents expressed satisfaction with the aesthetic result; 70% were extremely pleased. Early initiation of the treatment-protocol for outward curved concha deformation yielded excellent and timely results in the infants, without the necessity of an invasive procedure.

Long-Term Effectiveness of Ear Molding in Infants Using the EarWell Infant Correction System in China

BACKGROUND

Ear molding is a safe and effective way to treat babies born with ear deformities. In this study, the authors explored the long-term effectiveness of ear molding and determined the factors that relate to recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 200 consecutive infants treated with the EarWell System from March of 2018 to August of 2019 was performed. Immediate and long-term effectiveness was evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 190 children (314 ears) were included. The mean age at presentation was 16.2 days (range, 0 to 100 days). The most common deformity was constricted ear [172 ears (54.8 percent)], and the rarest deformity was cryptotia [four ears (1.3 percent)]. At the completion of treatment, 10 constricted ears were evaluated to be unsuccessful. The immediate success rates of mild and severe constricted ears were 95.7 percent and 93.1 percent, respectively. The average long-term follow-up was 336 days (range, 180 to 660 days) after completion of treatment. Twenty-two ears (7.2 percent) reverted to their original shape. The long-term success rates of severe constricted ears and prominent ears decreased most significantly, 83.3 percent (p = 0.030) and 66.7 percent (p = 0.042), respectively. Family history led to a decrease of long-term effectiveness of prominent ears. Age at application, sex, duration of molding, and retention taping were not correlated to the long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up demonstrated that in a percentage of babies, the ear deformities did recur after an initially successful treatment. Severe constricted ears and prominent ears are most likely to relapse.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Ear Deformations in Preterm Newborns: Non-Surgical Treatment

ABSTRACT

Approximately 30% of newborns have some degree of congenital ear anomalies, the minority will resolve spontaneously. Deformations can be treated non-surgically, when diagnosed early, whereas malformations surgically only. The authors use the EarWell system proven to achieve excellent results in treating deformations. Although prematurity might raise the risk of ear-deformations compared to term infants, in our experience, there is a longer time frame until effective treatment is initiated due to the cartilage malleability.Treatment included splinting with retractors and taping or a custom-made silicone ear-mold if necessary. Patients were examined weekly, and treatment continued until appropriate ear shape was achieved (6-14 weeks).The authors treated 8 preterm infants during 2018 to 2020 with the above method. Average age of application was 9.25 weeks; treatment was initiated in all patients before the age of 12 weeks. 5/8 had a right-side, 2/8 a left-side, and one a bilateral deformation. Average treatment duration was 10 ± 2.9 weeks. Assessment of satisfaction was made by parents via phone questionnaires; most were pleased with the overall result, while 62% were extremely satisfied.The authors observed higher compliance and longer-lasting malleability of the cartilage in preterm compared to term-infants. They also had fewer complications than in the term group, maybe due to their older (actual age), and more resistant and durable skin compared to a term-infant of the same age. The authors recommend initiating treatment in preterm infants later than accepted practice as results were excellent, and despite the longer treatment duration, this is a better treatment option than surgery.

An Essential Requirement for Fgf10 in Pinna Extension Sheds Light on Auricle Defects in LADD Syndrome

The pinna (or auricle) is part of the external ear, acting to capture and funnel sound toward the middle ear. The pinna is defective in a number of craniofacial syndromes, including Lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital (LADD) syndrome, which is caused by mutations in FGF10 or its receptor FGFR2b. Here we study pinna defects in the Fgf10 knockout mouse. We show that Fgf10 is expressed in both the muscles and forming cartilage of the developing external ear, with loss of signaling leading to a failure in the normal extension of the pinna over the ear canal. Conditional knockout of Fgf10 in the neural crest fails to recapitulate this phenotype, suggesting that the defect is due to loss of Fgf10 from the muscles, or that this source of Fgf10 can compensate for loss in the forming cartilage. The defect in the Fgf10 null mouse is driven by a reduction in proliferation, rather than an increase in cell death, which can be partially phenocopied by inhibiting cell proliferation in explant culture. Overall, we highlight the mechanisms that could lead to the phenotype observed in LADD syndrome patients and potentially explain the formation of similar low-set and cup shaped ears observed in other syndromes.

Non-surgical Correction of Congenital Ear Anomalies: A Review of the Literature

Congenital ear anomalies have been known to cause lasting psychosocial consequences for children. Congenital ear anomalies can generally be divided into malformations (chondro-cutaneous defect) and deformations (misshaped pinna). Operative techniques are the standard for correction at a minimal age of 5–7, exposing the children to teasing and heavy complications. Ear molding is a non-operative technique to treat ear anomalies at a younger age. Having been popularized since the 1980s, its use has increased over the past decades. However, uncertainties about its properties remain. Therefore, this review was conducted to look at what is known and what has been newly discovered in the last decade, comparing different treatment methods and materials. A literature search was performed on PubMed, and 16 articles, published in the last decade, were included. It was found that treatment initiated at an early age showed higher satisfactory outcome rates and a shorter duration of treatment. A shorter duration of treatment also led to higher satisfactory rates, which might be attributable to age at initiation, individual moldability, and treatment compliance. Complications were minor in all articles. Recurrence rate was low and mostly concerned prominent ears, which proved to be the most difficult to correct deformity as well. Malformations, however, were even more difficult to treat than deformations. Our analysis shows ear molding to be a successful treatment method for ear anomalies with a preference for early diagnosis and treatment.

Non-surgical correction of cryptotia

INTRODUCTION

Cryptotia is characterized by an absence of the upper part of the temporoauricular sulcus with the superior third of the auricle buried under the temporal skin. The principle of correction of cryptotia is to achieve both a functional and aesthetic ear.

METHODOLOGY

A 4-year prospective study was carried out in a single centre on infants with cryptotia. We introduce a two-staged approach for non-surgical correction of cryptotia and a treatment algorithm based on the age of the patient. In the first stage, we unbury the auricle over 2 weeks. The second stage involves 2 additional weeks of helical moulding to correct the underlying or residual deformation. In our algorithm, patients more than 6 weeks of age undergo only the first stage of cryptotia correction, whereas those less than 6 weeks of age progress to the second stage of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 5 patients (7 ears) were treated with ages ranging from 1 day to 7 months. Two patients underwent 2-stage treatment and 3 underwent 1-stage treatment. At 1 year, all buried helices remained retracted. Four out of 7 ears treated had "Excellent" outcomes and 3 out of 7 ears had "Good" outcomes. All caregivers were extremely satisfied with the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This simple and efficacious two-stage technique and algorithm is effective in the correction of cryptotia, even if the treatment is initiated beyond the traditional moulding window in the first six weeks of life. Using this approach, patients with cryptotia benefit by avoiding or simplifying surgical reconstruction in the future.

Ear Molding Therapy: Laypersons' Perceptions, Preferences, and Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

This study investigates laypersons’ perceptions of congenital ear deformities and preferences for treatment, particularly with ear molding therapy—an effective, noninvasive, yet time-sensitive treatment.

Nonoperative Molding of Congenital Ear Deformities: The Impact of Birth-Initiation Delay on Correction Outcome

Ear molding can improve the majority congenital ear deformities when employed early after birth. However, the best time to initiate treatment remains debated. In describing one surgeon's experience over the past near decade, this study aims to highlight differences conferred by treatment timing. The authors hypothesize that auricular outcomes are superior when deformities are molded beginning in the first 3 weeks of life. A retrospective review (2010-2018) of 272 cases was performed to compare early initiation of molding (<3 weeks of birth) and delayed initiation (>3 weeks). The mean patient age was 20.4 days and the mean follow-up was 0.5 months. The overall treatment was approximately 31 days. The number of devices required was similar (2.3 versus 2.5) between early and delayed molding cases, but fall-outs (1.0 versus 0.7, P = 0.02) and replacements (0.9 versus 0.6, P = 0.004) were more common after delayed molding. Skin complications developed in 13.6% (37) of ears overall and did not differ by treatment timing. Follow-up surgery was reported in 2 (0.7%) ears. The 85% of families reported subjective satisfaction with the final outcome; satisfaction was significantly higher for early cases (97% versus 79%, P = 0.03). Ear molding of congenital ear deformities should begin within 3 weeks of birth. From our experience, setting realistic expectations helps limit discrepancies between expectation and outcome.