Reverse End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous Nerve-to-Ulnar Motor Transfer for Severe Ulnar Neuropathy

Alternative Nerve Coaptations: End-To-Side and Beyond

Modern end-to-side (ETS) nerve transfers have undergone several permutations since the early 1990's. Preclinical data have revealed important mechanisms and patterns of donor axon outgrowth into the recipient nerves and target reinnervation. The versatility of ETS nerve transfers can also potentially address several processes that limit functional recovery after nerve injury by babysitting motor end-plates and/or supporting the regenerative environment within the denervated nerve. Further clinical and basic science work is required to clarify the ideal clinical indications, contraindications, and mechanisms of action for these techniques in order to maximize their potential as reconstructive options.

Sciatic and tibial neuropathies

The sciatic nerve is the body's largest peripheral nerve. Along with their two terminal divisions (tibial and fibular), their anatomic location makes them particularly vulnerable to trauma and iatrogenic injuries. A thorough understanding of the functional anatomy is required to adequately localize lesions in this lengthy neural pathway. Proximal disorders of the nerve can be challenging to precisely localize among a range of possibilities including lumbosacral pathology, radiculopathy, or piriformis syndrome. A correct diagnosis is based upon a thorough history and physical examination, which will then appropriately direct adjunctive investigations such as imaging and electrodiagnostic testing. Disorders of the sciatic nerve and its terminal branches are disabling for patients, and expert assessment by rehabilitation professionals is important in limiting their impact. Applying techniques established in the upper extremity, surgical reconstruction of lower extremity nerve dysfunction is rapidly improving and evolving. These new techniques, such as nerve transfers, require electrodiagnostic assessment of both the injured nerve(s) as well as healthy, potential donor nerves as part of a complete neurophysiological examination.

The hand diagram: A novel outcome measure following supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar nerve transfer in severe compressive ulnar neuropathy

BACKGROUND

With advances in the surgical management for severe ulnar neuropathy with the introduction of the super charged-end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve transfer, a simple and reliable outcome measure is required. There is currently not "one" standardized outcome measure used to represent and compare results.

PURPOSE

To present the abduction hand diagram as a "novel", reproducible, and simple outcome measure for patients with severe ulnar neuropathy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Nine patients with severe entrapment/compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow were reviewed. Clinical parameters included preoperative and postoperative abduction tracings, Medical Research Grade (MRC) muscle strength, key pinch strength, Disability of the Hand Arm and Shoulder (DASH) score, and crossed finger test. Electrodiagnostic data included change in compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) amplitude of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM). Summary statistics were used for demographic and clinical data.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 22.8 ± 9.3 months. At 18-months of follow up, 44% had ADM MRC grade 3 strength or higher, mean key pinch strength improved to 72 ± 19.3%, and mean DASH was 33 ± 28.7. There was a mean increase of 16.7 ± 9.1 mm and 31.5 ± 12 mm in total and summed hand abduction tracing measurements respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand abduction tracings are a quantitative outcome measure to follow recovery over time for intrinsic hand function and can be used in patients with severe ulnar neuropathy following surgical intervention.

A Surgical Framework for the Management of Incomplete Axillary Nerve Injuries

BACKGROUND

 Axillary nerve injury is the most common nerve injury affecting shoulder function. Nerve repair, grafting, and/or end-to-end nerve transfers are used to reconstruct complete neurotmetic axillary nerve injuries. While many incomplete axillary nerve injuries self-resolve, axonotmetic injuries are unpredictable, and incomplete recovery occurs. Similarly, recovery may be further inhibited by superimposed compression neuropathy at the quadrangular space. The current framework for managing incomplete axillary injuries typically does not include surgery.

METHODS

 This study is a retrospective analysis of 23 consecutive patients with incomplete axillary nerve palsy who underwent quadrangular space decompression with additional selective medial triceps to axillary end-to-side nerve transfers in 7 patients between 2015 and 2019. Primary outcome variables included the proportion of patients with shoulder abduction M3 or greater as measured on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and shoulder pain measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome variables included pre- and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) scores.

RESULTS

 A total of 23 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent nerve surgery a mean 10.7 months after injury. Nineteen (83%) patients achieved MRC grade 3 shoulder abduction or greater after intervention, compared with only 4 (17%) patients preoperatively (p = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in VAS shoulder pain scores of 4.2 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 2.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The DASH scores also decreased significantly from 48.8 ± 19.0 preoperatively to 30.7 ± 20.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Total follow-up was 17.3 ± 4.3 months.

CONCLUSION

 A surgical framework is presented for the appropriate diagnosis and surgical management of incomplete axillary nerve injury. Quadrangular space decompression with or without selective medial triceps to axillary end-to-side nerve transfers is associated with improvement in shoulder abduction strength, pain, and DASH scores in patients with incomplete axillary nerve palsy.

Modified contralateral C7 transfer to restore ulnar nerve function without sacrificing median nerve recovery: an experimental study

Contralateral C7 (cC7) transfer is a technique used in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion. An ulnar nerve graft (UNG) is usually used, as intrinsic function is not expected to be restored due to length of reinnervation required. In this study, we attempted to improve intrinsic function recovery by preserving the deep branch of the ulnar nerve (dbUN) and reanimating it with the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) after cC7 transfer. Fifty-four rats were divided into the following three groups: Group A, traditional cC7 transfer to the median nerve with a UNG; Group B, cC7 transfer preserving and repairing the dbUN with the terminal branch of the AIN; Group C, same as Group B; however, the dbUN was coapted after 1 month with the AIN. At 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively, the results of electrodiagnostic and histomorphometric examinations of the interosseous muscle were significantly better in Groups B and C, without affecting AIN recovery. In conclusion, the modified cC7 transfer technique can potentially improve intrinsic function recovery without affecting median nerve recovery.

Modern Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Evidence and Controversy

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common peripheral mononeuropathy in the upper extremity. However, the diagnosis and treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome remains controversial without a standard algorithm. Although diagnosis can often be made from the patient's history and physical examination alone, electrodiagnostic studies, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance image (MRI) can also be useful in diagnosing the disease and selecting the most appropriate treatment option. Treatment options include conservative nonoperative techniques as well as various surgical options, including in situ decompression with or without transposition, medial epicondylectomy, and nerve transfer in advanced disease. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most up-to-date literature regarding cubital tunnel syndrome and propose a treatment algorithm to provide clarity about the challenges of treating this complex patient population.

Reverse End-to-Side Transfer to Ulnar Motor Nerve: Evidence From Preclinical and Clinical Studies

The disappointing outcomes of conventional nerve repair or grafting procedures for proximal ulnar nerve injuries have led the scientific community to search for better alternatives. The pronator quadratus branch of the anterior interosseous nerve has been transferred to the distal ulnar motor branch in a reverse end-to-side fashion with encouraging results. This transfer is now becoming commonly used as an adjunct to cubital tunnel decompression in patients with compressive ulnar neuropathy, underscoring the need for this knowledge transfer to the neurosurgical community. However, the mechanism of recovery after these transfers is not understood completely. We have reviewed the existing preclinical and clinical literature relevant to this transfer to summarize the current level of understanding of the underlying mechanisms, define the indications for performing this transfer in the clinic, and identify the complications and best practices with respect to the operative technique. We have also attempted to identify the major deficiencies in our current level of understanding of the recovery process to propose directions for future research.

Interfascicular Anatomy of the Motor Branch of the Ulnar Nerve: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

The motor branch of the ulnar nerve contains fascicles that innervate the intrinsic musculature of the hand. This cadaveric study aimed to describe the organization and consistency of the internal topography of the motor branch of the ulnar nerve.

METHODS

Five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens with an average age of 74 years (range, 65-88 years) were dissected. The ulnar nerve was exposed and transfixed to the underlying tissues to maintain its orientation throughout the dissection. The dorsal cutaneous branch (DCB) and the volar sensory branch were identified and reflected to expose the motor branch. The fascicles to the first dorsal interosseus (FDI), flexor pollicis brevis, and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) were identified. Internal neurolysis was performed distal to proximal to identify the interfascicular arrangement of these fascicles within the motor branch. The organization of these fascicles was noted, and the branch points of the DCB, FDI, and ADM were measured relative to the pisiform using a handheld electronic caliper.

RESULTS

The internal topography of the motor branch was consistent among all specimens. Proximal to the pisiform, the arrangement from radial to ulnar was as follows: volar sensory branch, flexor pollicis brevis, FDI/intrinsic muscles, ADM, and DCB. The position of these branches remained consistent as the deep motor branch curved radially within the palm and traveled to the terminal musculature. The locations of the average branch points of the FDI, ADM, and DCB with respect to the pisiform were as follows: FDI, 4.6 cm distal (range, 4.1-4.9 cm), 4.5 cm radial (range, 4.1-4.9 cm); ADM, 0.65 cm distal (range, 0.3-1.1 cm), 0.7 cm radial (range, 0.3-1.1 cm), DCB, 7.7 cm proximal (range, 4.2-10.1 cm), and 0.4 cm ulnar (range, 0.3-0.8 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

The internal topography of the ulnar nerve motor branch was consistent among the specimens studied. The topography of the motor branches was maintained as the motor branch turns radially within the palm.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides further understanding of the internal topography of the ulnar nerve motor branch at the wrist level.

Reverse End-to-Side Nerve Transfer for Severe Ulnar Nerve Injury: A Western Canadian Multicentre Prospective Nonrandomized Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Reverse end-to-side (RETS) nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in patients with severe high ulnar nerve injury, but the reported outcomes have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the "babysitting effect," we compared outcomes after anterior interosseous nerve RETS transfer with nerve decompression alone. To evaluate the source of regenerating axons, a group with end-to-end (ETE) transfer was used for comparisons.

METHODS

Electrophysiology measures were used to quantify the regeneration of anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and ulnar nerve fibers while functional recovery was evaluated using key pinch and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The subjects were followed postsurgically for 3 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-two subjects (RETS = 25, ETE = 16, and decompression = 21) from 4 centers in Western Canada were enrolled. All subjects with severe ulnar nerve injury had nerve compression at the elbow except 10 in the ETE group had nerve laceration or traction injury. Postsurgically, no reinnervation from the AIN to the abductor digiti minimi muscles was seen in any of the RETS subjects. Although there was no significant improvement in compound muscle action potentials amplitudes and pressure detection thresholds in the decompression and RETS group, key pinch strength significantly improved in the RETS group ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The results from published clinical trials are conflicting in part because crossover regeneration from the donor nerve has never been measured. Unlike those with ETE nerve transfers, we found that there was no crossover regeneration in the RETS group. The extent of reinnervation was also no different from decompression surgery alone. Based on these findings, the justifications for this surgical technique need to be carefully re-evaluated.

Evaluation of functional recovery in the intrinsic and flexor muscles after nerve transfer for ulnar nerve lesion. A new measurement method: The Cha method

"Supercharge" end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfer for lesions of the proximal ulnar nerve is a recognized novel option, but improvement in motor function after surgery has not been properly evaluated. We therefore propose a modified method for quantitative evaluation of improvement in the intrinsic hand strength. We screened 216 patients with proximal ulnar nerve lesions who presented to our outpatient department from 2012 to 2020. Of these, 101 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria and were evaluated just before surgery. We used a novel method to measure finger abduction ("2nd-abd"), adduction ("5th-add"), and ring and little finger flexion strength ("4,5 grip"), and analyzed correlations with established pinch strength data. The male:female sex ratio was 86:15, and the ratio dominant to nondominant arm involvement was 68:33. All strength measurements were analyzed as percentage affected to contralateral normal side. On Pearson correlation analysis, the strength ratios for "4,5 grip", "2nd-abd", and "5th-add", but not "5 fingers (total) grip", showed significant positive correlation with key and oppositional pinch strength (all p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, linear regression analysis showed identical results for each strength correlation with key/oppositional pinch, except for "5 fingers total) grip" (all, p &lt; 0.001). SETS is a reasonable alternative for lesions of the proximal ulnar nerve. The measurement method we propose is feasible for specific assessment of intrinsic muscle strength, which improves after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level IV.

Contemporary Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Surgery

“State of the Art” Learning Objectives: This manuscript serves to provide the reader with a general overview of the contemporary approaches to peripheral nerve reconstruction as the field has undergone considerable advancement over the last 3 decades. The learning objectives are as follows: To provide the reader with a brief history of peripheral nerve surgery and some of the landmark developments that allow for current peripheral nerve care practices. To outline the considerations and management options for the care of patients with brachial plexopathy, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity peripheral nerve injury. Highlight contemporary surgical techniques to address terminal neuroma and phantom limb pain. Review progressive and future procedures in peripheral nerve care, such as supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers. Discuss rehabilitation techniques for peripheral nerve care.

Classifying the Severity of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Preoperative Grading System Incorporating Electrodiagnostic Parameters

BACKGROUND

Current classifications for cubital tunnel syndrome have not been shown to reliably predict postoperative outcomes. In this article, the authors introduce a new classification that incorporates clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters, including compound muscle action potential amplitude, to classify the preoperative severity of cubital tunnel syndrome. The authors compare this to established classifications and evaluate its association with patient-rated improvement.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 44 patients who were treated surgically for cubital tunnel syndrome. Patients were retrospectively classified using their proposed classification and the Akahori, McGowan-Goldberg, Dellon, and Gu classifications. Correlation of grades was assessed by Spearman coefficients and agreement was assessed by weighted kappa coefficients. Patient-reported impairment was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The classifications tended to grade patients in a similar way, with Spearman coefficients of 0.60 to 0.85 ( p < 0.0001) and weighted kappa coefficients of 0.46 to 0.71 ( p < 0.0001). Preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores increased with severity grade for most classifications. In multivariable analysis, the authors' classification predicted postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improvement, whereas established classifications did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Established classifications are imperfect indicators of preoperative severity. The authors introduce a preoperative classification for cubital tunnel syndrome that incorporates electrodiagnostic findings in addition to classic signs and symptoms.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, III.

Rehabilitation Following Nerve Transfer Surgery

Nerve transfer surgery is an important new addition to the treatment paradigm following nerve trauma. The following rehabilitation plan has been developed over the past 15 years, in an interdisciplinary, tertiary peripheral nerve program at the "Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre." This center evaluates more than 400 patients with complex nerve injuries annually and has been routinely using nerve transfers since 2005. The described rehabilitation program includes input from patients, therapists, physiatrists, and surgeons and has evolved based on experience and updated science. The plan is comprised of phases which are practical, reproducible and will serve as a framework to allow other peripheral nerve programs to adapt and improve the "Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre" paradigm to enhance patient outcomes.

Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfer: A systematic review

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The management of failed cubital tunnel decompression

Cubital tunnel decompression is a commonly performed operation with a much higher failure rate than carpal tunnel release.

Failed cubital tunnel release generally occurs due to an inadequate decompression in the primary procedure, new symptoms due to an iatrogenic cause, or development of new areas of nerve irritation.

Our preferred technique for failed release is revision circumferential neurolysis with medial epicondylectomy, as this eliminates strain, removes the risk of subluxation, and avoids the creation of secondary compression points.

Adjuvant techniques including supercharging end-to-side nerve transfer and nerve wrapping show promise in improving the results of revision surgery.

Limited quality research exists in this subject, compounded by the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria, classification, and outcome assessment.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:735-742. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200135

Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfers: A Systematic Review

Background There has been an increasing utilization of end-to-end (ETE) and reverse “supercharged” end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve transfers (NTs) for treatment of high ulnar nerve injury. This study aimed to review the potential indications for, and outcomes of, ETE and SETS AIN–ulnar NT.

Methods A literature review was performed, and 10 articles with 156 patients who had sufficient follow-up to evaluate functional outcomes were included. English studies were included if they reported the outcome of patients with ulnar nerve injuries treated with AIN to ulnar motor NT. Outcomes were analyzed based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, grip and key pinch strength, and interosseous Medical Research Council–graded motor strength. Comparisons were made using the independent t-test and the chi-square test. No nerve graft control group was required for eligibility. Ulnar nerve injury types varied.

Results NT resulted in 77% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, 53.7 ± 19.8 lb grip strength recovery, 61 ± 21% key pinch recovery, and a mean DASH score of 33.4 ± 16. In this diverse group, NT resulted in significantly greater M3+ recovery and grip strength recovery measured in pounds than in the nerve graft/conventional treatment group, and ETE repairs had significantly better outcomes compared with SETS repairs for grip strength, key pinch strength, and DASH scores, but heterogeneity limits interpretation.

Conclusion ETE and SETS AIN–ulnar NTs produce significant restoration of ulnar nerve motor function for high ulnar nerve injuries. For ulnar nerve transection injuries at or above the elbow, ETE NT results in superior motor recovery compared with nerve grafting/conventional repair. However, further research is needed to determine the best treatment for other types of ulnar nerve injury and the role of SETS NT.

Role of electrodiagnosis in nerve transfers for focal neuropathies and brachial plexopathies

Over the past 2 decades, the surgical treatment of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injuries has advanced considerably. Nerve transfers have become an important surgical tool in addition to nerve repair and grafting. Electrodiagnosis has traditionally played a role in the diagnosis and localization of peripheral nervous system injuries, but a different approach is needed for surgical decision-making and monitoring recovery. When patients have complete or severe injuries they should be referred to surgical colleagues early after injury, as outcomes are best when nerve transfers are performed within the first 3 to 6 mo after onset. Patients with minimal recovery of voluntary activity are particularly challenging, and the presence of a few motor unit action potentials in these individuals should be interpreted on the basis of timing and evidence of ongoing reinnervation. Evaluation of potential recipient and donor muscles, as well as redundant muscles, for nerve transfers requires an individualized approach to optimize the chances of a successful surgical intervention. Anomalous innervation takes on new importance in these patients. Communication between surgeons and electrodiagnostic medicine specialists (EMSs) is best facilitated by a joint collaborative clinic. Ongoing monitoring of recovery post-operatively is critical to allow for decision making for continued surgical and rehabilitation treatments. Different electrodiagnostic findings are expected with resolution of neurapraxia, distal axon sprouting, and axonal regrowth. As new surgical techniques become available, EMSs will play an important role in the assessment and treatment of these patients with severe nerve injuries.