Thresholds for Safety of Cleft Lip Surgery in Premature Infants

Age at Initial Cleft Lip Repair Among Children in Al Madinah Region

BACKGROUND

 Cleft lip and palate consists of a wide spectrum of anomalies affecting the oral cavity and lips and can have enduring adverse effects on health. The age at which surgical interventions are done is crucial as it can influence the outcomes. This study aimed to determine the age at which initial cleft lip repairs were performed and the proportion of individuals who underwent additional surgeries to address post-repair complications.

METHODS

 A cross-sectional study involving 120 participants was conducted. Data was collected by distributing an online questionnaire to parents of children who had undergone initial cleft lip repair in the Al Madinah region.

RESULTS

 The study found that the average age for the initial cleft lip repair in Medina is 0.46 ± 0.27 years. Post-repair complications were observed, including hearing loss in 10.9% of children, heavy breathing issues in 32.8%, an imbalance in facial expression in 47.9%, and swallowing problems in 3.4% of children even after surgery. Approximately 40% of parents sought further procedures to mitigate complications.

CONCLUSION

 The study indicated that the first cleft lip repair in Medina typically occurs during the first year of life. However, more extensive research is needed to assess the efficacy of procedures within the city. Further studies should be conducted to provide a more comprehensive understanding of these conditions and the outcomes of their treatments.

Narcotic Utilization After Cleft Lip Repair: Does Local Anesthetic Choice Matter?

To analyze whether the choice of intraoperative local anesthetic for cleft lip repair is associated with the amount of perioperative narcotic utilization.

Retrospective cohort study.

Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System.

Primary cleft lip repairs performed in the United States from 2010 to 2020.

Local anesthesia injected-treatment with lidocaine alone, bupivacaine alone, or treatment with both agents.

Perioperative narcotic administration.

During the study interval, 8954 patients underwent primary cleft lip repair. Narcotic utilization for unilateral (P < .001) and bilateral (P = .004) cleft lip repair has decreased over the last 5 years. Overall, 21.8% (n = 1950) of infants were administered perioperative narcotics for cleft lip repair, such that 14.3% (n = 1282) required narcotics on POD 0, and 7.2% (n = 647) required narcotics on POD 1.In this study, 36.5% (n = 3269) patients received lidocaine, 22.0% (n = 1966) patients received bupivacaine, and 19.7% (n = 1762) patients received both local anesthetics. Administration of any perioperative narcotic was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P = .001, 17.5% vs 21.7%) or only bupivacaine (P < .001, 17.5% vs 22.9%). Narcotic utilization on the day of surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P < .001, 11.5% vs 15.1%) or only bupivacaine (P = .004, 11.5% vs 14.6%). Narcotic utilization on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only bupivacaine (P = .009, 5.9% vs 8.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In children undergoing cleft lip repair, local anesthetic combination of lidocaine and bupivacaine is associated with decreased perioperative narcotic use compared to lidocaine or bupivacaine alone.

Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip and/or palate repair techniques require continued reevaluation of best practice through high-quality evidence. The objective of this systematic review was to highlight the existing evidence for patient safety and quality improvement (QI) initiatives in cleft lip and palate surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature evaluating patient safety and QI in patients with cleft lip and/or palate was conducted from database inception to June 9, 2022, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies, Cochrane, or a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 instruments, according to study type.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies met inclusion criteria, with most published between 2010 and 2020 (63.9%). Randomized controlled trials represented the most common study design (37.7%). Half of all included studies were related to the topic of pain and analgesia, with many supporting the use of infraorbital nerve block using 0.25% bupivacaine. The second most common intervention examined was use of perioperative antibiotics in reducing fistula and infection (11.5%). Other studies examined optimal age and closure material for cleft lip repair, early recovery after surgery protocols, interventions to reduce blood loss, and safety of outpatient surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient safety and QI studies in cleft surgery were of moderate quality overall and covered a wide range of interventions. To further enhance PS in cleft repair, more high-quality research in the areas of perioperative pharmaceutical usage, appropriate wound closure materials, and optimal surgical timing are needed.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Cleft Lip Care

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to utilize a multicenter dataset to elucidate whether socioeconomic factors were associated with access to cleft lip surgery, treatment by higher-volume providers, and family choice for higher-volume centers.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System.

PATIENTS

Primary cleft lip repair performed in the United States between 2010 and 2020.

OUTCOMES

Travel distance, hospital volume, hospital choice.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 8954 patients underwent unilateral (78.4%, n  =  7021) or bilateral (21.6%, n  =  1933) primary cleft lip repair. Patients with unilateral cleft lip were repaired significantly earlier if they were White (P < .001) and significantly later if they lived in an urban community (P  =  .043). Similarly, patients with bilateral cleft lip were repaired significantly earlier if they were White (P < .001). Patients from above-median income households (P  =  .011) and living in urban communities (P < .001) were significantly more likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals, whereas those living in underserved communities (P < .001) were significantly less likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals. White patients were significantly more likely to be treated by high-volume surgeons (P < .001). Patients with White race were significantly more likely to choose a higher-volume hospital than the one most locally available (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with White race are more likely to travel farther and be treated by high-volume surgeons although at smaller hospitals. Patients from underserved areas travel significantly farther for cleft care and are treated at lower-volume hospitals. Patients in urban communities have shorter travel distances and are treated at higher-volume hospitals.