The Affordable Care Act and Its Impact on Plastic and Gender-Affirmation Surgery

Impact of Anti-Discrimination Legislation on Access to Gender-affirming Care: A Commercial Claims Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the temporal relationship between the anti-discrimination rules of the Affordable Care Act, which took full effect in 2017, and the incidence of commercial claims for gender-affirming care, as well as cost sharing for these services.

METHODS

We used a previously described algorithm to define a cohort of gender-diverse adults in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Claims for gender-affirming medical and surgical care were identified using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes plus pharmacy data; the annual incidence of surgical claims was calculated. Interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate the temporal relationship between claims and anti-discrimination legislation. Claims data were also used to evaluate the patient contribution towards services.

RESULTS

There were 70,733 gender-diverse adults included in the study and 36,702 (51.9%) of them filed claims for gender-affirming care. The incidence of persons with claims for gender-affirming surgery increased from 0.002% in 2009 to 0.012% in 2021. Interrupted time series analyses demonstrated a greater year-to-year increase in claims after anti-discrimination policy influences took effect. This change was greatest for transmasculine chest procedures. The median lifetime net payment for gender-affirming surgery was $12,429.10 and cost sharing was $1019.20 (8.6%).

CONCLUSION

Commercial claims for gender-affirming surgery increased temporally with respect to implementation of anti-discrimination legislation and cost-sharing was reasonably low. However, many gender-diverse persons did not have claims for gender-affirming care, which may indicate continued out-of-pocket payment for these services.

Barriers to quality healthcare among transgender and gender nonconforming adults

OBJECTIVE

To determine the barriers transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) adults face when accessing or receiving healthcare in the United States.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

Primary data were collected between September 2022 and March 2023 from a purposive sample of TGNC adults (N = 116 participants) using an online survey with a series of open-ended and closed-ended questions.

STUDY DESIGN

Thematic analysis was employed to extract and analyze participants' responses to an open-ended question about challenges they experienced when accessing or receiving healthcare. Two members of the research team conducted qualitative data analyses using Dedoose. The quality of each analysis was subsequently reviewed by a third research team member.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Data were collected from responses to one open-ended question that asked about participants' healthcare barriers as a TGNC individual.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Five main themes surrounding healthcare barriers emerged from the content analysis: (1) acceptability, (2) accommodation, (3) affordability, (4) availability, and (5) accessibility. First, participants who noted acceptability issues reported explicit discriminatory treatment from providers, providers not using their chosen names and pronouns (e.g., misgendering), and provider refusal to provide gender-affirming care. Second, participants who experienced accommodation challenges identified provider medical training gaps on TGNC patient needs and administrative barriers to care. Third, participants explained affordability issues due to a lack of adequate health insurance coverage. Fourth, participants described availability challenges with accessing hormone therapy prescriptions. Finally, participants noted accessibility issues with obtaining TGNC-specific care at LGBTQ+-affirming clinics.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a growing interest in the needs of TGNC adults within healthcare settings. This requires that health policies are enacted to ensure that TGNC adults have access to healthcare that is accommodating and accepting/affirming. Study findings may provide insight into the potential impact of current legislation on transgender access and availability.

Use of Titanium Mesh During Frontal Sinus Setback in Facial Feminization Surgery: Clinical Outcomes and Perspectives

Brow position, hairline shape, and forehead projection may confer cis-feminine identity, and facial feminization surgery (FFS) can improve gender dysphoria among transfeminine patients. Depending on the Ousterhout classification, burring, osteotomy, anterior frontal sinus setback, and augmentation, with subsequent fixation via metal or bioabsorbable plates, can address forehead projection. However, titanium mesh, often used in frontal sinus fracture repair, has not been described for forehead contouring in FFS. The purpose of this study was to study clinical outcomes associated with the use of titanium mesh for the stabilization of bone following anterior frontal sinus setback. A retrospective cohort study of trans-female and nonbinary patients undergoing primary FFS by our senior author between January 2021 and February 2023 was performed. Variables collected include demographics, Ousterhout classification, operative details, complications, and follow-up duration. Patients with prior FFS or facial trauma were excluded. Data were analyzed using SPSS, (IBM, Armonk, NY). Forty-three transfeminine patients were included for analysis. The cohort had an average age of 33.0±8.7 years and a median follow-up time of 3.0 months (IQR = 1.0-7.0). Among our cohort, 26 patients (60.5%) received titanium mesh and 17 patients (39.5%) underwent burring only for forehead contouring. There were no reported complications (ie, infection, hardware extrusion, or mucocele formation) or a need for forehead revisions among the entire cohort regardless of the frontal sinus reconstruction material utilized. Clinical outcomes were favorable among patients receiving titanium mesh anterior table fixation during FFS. Titanium mesh can be considered as an additional technique for frontal bossing reduction and anterior table fixation in FFS.

Gender-Affirming Care for Older Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults

In the United States, it is estimated that 0.3% of Americans aged 65 and older, or almost 172,000 individuals, identify as transgender. Aging comes with a unique set of challenges and experiences for this population, including health care disparities, mental health concerns, and social isolation. It is crucial for clinicians to use a patient-centered and trauma-informed care approach to address their specific needs and provide evidence-based quality health care, including preventive screenings, mental health support, and advocating for legal protections.

Epidemiology of Gender Diversity

In the United States, approximately 1.6 million individuals identify as transgender and gender diverse (TGD), encompassing a wide range of identities and experiences. Despite progress in visibility and acceptance, TGD people continue to face health care and societal disparities, especially affecting racial minorities. Although legal advancements have been achieved, the key to addressing these persistent health care disparities lies in implementing comprehensive and culturally sensitive health care practices and supportive policies. With a growing number of TGD people seeking gender-affirming care, it is imperative that health care practitioners understand the unique challenges faced by this community and provide tailored services with sensitivity and expertise.

Surgical Standards of Care and Insurance Authorization of Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery

Transgender and gender-diverse patients face complex, multifactorial barriers to medically necessary gender-affirming care. Insurance coverage for facial feminizing and masculinizing surgeries is one such obstacle. Providers and affiliated team members must have a comprehensive understanding of clinical standards of care, medical documentation, insurance policy and terminology, and related legislation to successfully navigate this administrative quagmire and ensure patient access to care..

The Effect of Obesity on Vaginoplasty Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Some surgeons use body mass index criteria within the patient selection processes before vaginoplasty, thereby limiting access to select obese patients. We sought to better characterize the effect of obesity on postoperative outcomes across multiple vaginoplasty techniques.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of all transfeminine patients undergoing primary vaginoplasty procedures from December 2018 to July 2022 was conducted. Patients were stratified into cohorts according to the World Health Organization Obesity Class criteria. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, operative details, postoperative complications, and all-cause revision were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients met the inclusion criteria. Average follow-up duration was 9.1 ± 4.7 months. Multivariate regression revealed that patients with class I and class II/III obesity were associated with higher odds of developing vaginal stenosis (class I: odds ratio [OR], 7.1 [ P = 0.003]; class II/III: OR, 3.4 [ P = 0.018]) and all-cause revision (class I: OR, 3.7 [ P = 0.021]; class II/III: OR, 4.8 [ P = 0.027]). Undergoing either robotic peritoneal or robotic intestinal vaginoplasty was associated with lower odds of delayed wound healing (peritoneal: OR, 0.2 [ P < 0.001]; intestinal: OR, 0.2 [ P = 0.011]). Lastly, adherence to dilation regimen was negatively associated with development of vaginal stenosis (OR, 0.04; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with obesity may be at a higher risk of developing vaginal stenosis after vaginoplasty, which may ultimately necessitate operative revision. Although patients with obesity may remain surgical candidates, proper preoperative counseling and adherence to postoperative vaginal dilation regimens are critical to optimizing outcomes.

Geographic Differences in Patient Demographics and Performance of Gender-Affirming Surgery From 2016 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Although legislation prohibiting gender identity discrimination in health insurance has shown some improvement in insurance coverage for gender-affirming surgery (GAS), recent bills criminalizing GAS providers in the South and Midwest regions pose threats to patient care.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the influence of US census region on patient demographics and GAS rates in the ambulatory surgery setting.

METHODS

Individuals with gender dysphoria who underwent GAS in the ambulatory setting from 2016 to 2019 were identified in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample (NASS) with billing codes. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed and stratified by US census region.

RESULTS

The data set included a weighted estimate of 33,174 encounters with 72.8% (95% CI, 69.1-76.2) for chest reconstruction; 24.1% (95% CI, 20.9-27.5) for surgery on the genitals and reproductive organs; and 6.0% (95% CI, 4.6-7.8) for facial surgery. Overall, the rates of GAS increased by 187%, from 4320 encounters in 2016 to 12,396 encounters in 2019. In the Midwest, GAS increased by 257% compared to 203% in the Northeast, 218% in the South, and 154% in the West. Compared to patients in the West, those in other regions had higher odds of anxiety and depression (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.26; P < .05) and were more likely to have lower incomes than other ambulatory surgery patients in the region (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2016 and 2019, there was substantial growth of GAS in the Midwest, South, and Northeast. Regional differences in insurance coverage, socioeconomic status, availability of facial surgery, and comorbidities were observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgeries in the United States from 2010 to 2021

Introduction:  In 2017, an estimated 1.6 million adults and 150,000 teenagers identified as transgender in the United States. With ever-changing legislative developments regarding health care benefits for this population and the increasing number of patients presenting for gender-affirming surgery (GAS), there is a scarcity of literature on the temporal trends within the past decade. The objective of this study was to examine the temporal trends of the utilization of GAS. Methods:  We conducted a cross-sectional study using TriNetX, a federated research network containing deidentified aggregate patient data. Using International Code of Disease (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, we identified patients with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent GAS from 2010 to 2021. Basic demographic information and complications were analyzed. Complications of interest included site failure, infection, and systemic complications. Results:  We identified a total of 8,403 patients who underwent GAS between January 2010 and December 2021. The number of procedures per year increased nearly 500% between 2016 and 2021 from 421 procedures to 2,224 procedures. Our demographic results were consistent with previous survey-based studies. The average age of patients who underwent masculinizing surgeries was consistently younger than those who underwent feminizing surgeries. Most patients undergoing GAS were of white race. The overall complication rate was 4.7%. Conclusion:  In conclusion, our study reveals a significant and rapid rise in the utilization of GAS in the United States, with a fivefold increase in procedures between 2016 and 2021. The demographic characteristics and low complication rates observed highlight the evolving landscape of health care for transgender individuals and the need for ongoing assessment and support in this field.

Trends of Medicare reimbursement rates for gender affirmation procedures

BACKGROUND

While nearly 1 in 5 Americans receives health insurance coverage through Medicare, literature suggests that Medicare reimbursement is lagging behind inflation for many plastic surgery procedures.

AIM

This article evaluates trends in Medicare reimbursement for gender affirmation procedures.

METHODS

The most common gender affirmation procedures performed at an urban academic medical center were identified in this cross-sectional study (level 4 evidence). Five nongender surgery codes were evaluated for reference. A standardized formula utilizing relative value units (RVUs) was used to calculate monetary data. Differences in reimbursement between 2014 and 2021 were calculated for each procedure.

OUTCOME

The main outcome was inflation-adjusted difference of charges from 2014 to 2021.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021, Medicare reimbursement for gender affirmation procedures had an inflation-unadjusted average change of -0.09% (vs +5.63% for the selected nongender codes) and an inflation-adjusted change of -10.03% (vs -5.54% for the selected nongender codes). Trends in reimbursement varied by category of gender-affirming procedure. The overall average compound annual growth rate had a change of -0.99% (vs -0.53% for the selected nongender codes). The average changes in work, facility, and malpractice RVUs were -1.05%, +9.52%, and -0.93%, respectively.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Gender surgeons and patients should be aware that the decrease in reimbursement may affect access to gender-affirming care.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Our study is one of the first evaluating the reimbursement rates associated with the full spectrum of gender affirmation surgery. However, our study is limited by its cross-sectional nature.

CONCLUSIONS

From 2014 to 2021, Medicare reimbursement for gender affirmation procedures lagged inflation.

Breast care considerations for transgender and gender-diverse patients

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) persons represent a small but growing population in the United States. Accessing inclusive, equitable, and evidence-based healthcare remains a challenge for this patient population. Many TGD persons seek gender-affirming care, including gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) and gender-affirming surgery (GAS), to help ameliorate the physical and mental aspects of their gender incongruence. Both GAHT and GAS induce clinically important histopathologic and anatomic changes in breast tissue. Consequently, breast care in TGD persons has become an increasingly recognized topic of importance in gender-affirming care. However, there remains a scarce but growing base of literature specifically addressing the unique healthcare needs of breast care in TGD patients. This article will review how to establish trusting patient-provider relationships for TGD patients, gender inclusivity in breast clinics and imaging centers, the influence of GAHT and GAS on breast tissue, breast cancer screening recommendations and barriers, and breast cancer risk and treatment considerations in TGD persons.

The Limited Coverage of Facial Feminization Surgery in the United States: A Literature Review of Policy Constraints and Implications

There is a literature gap regarding facial feminization surgery (FFS) access and coverage. Our goal is to compile information from previous studies and assess the current policy landscape for these surgeries in the US. We also explored why some policies do not cover them, identify states with better coverage, and determine the most covered procedures. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies that reviewed policies on FFS coverage. Studies on surgical techniques or other gender-affirming surgeries (GASs) that did not involve FFS were excluded. Seven studies were included for analysis. In 2014, the Department of Human Health Services (HHS) lifted the transgender exclusion policy, leading to an increase in policies regarding GASs for both private and state insurance. However, there are differences in medical necessity requirements among policies, which may not align with the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) criteria. States that prohibit exclusion tend to offer better coverage for FFS. These states are mainly located in the western and northeast regions, whereas states in the southern and middle east regions have less coverage. Among the procedures, chondrolaryngoplasty is the most covered, while facial and cervical rhytidectomy are the least covered. To enhance transgender care, it is crucial to reach a consensus on how to offer coverage for facial feminization surgery. However, there is a lack of adequate research on this topic, and there is a need for resources and tools to assess the results of FFS procedures. One significant constraint of this study is that it does not provide a systematic review of the literature.

Intrathecal Morphine Injection for Postoperative Analgesia Following Gender-Affirming Pelvic Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Background Gender-affirming pelvic surgery (GAPS) can be associated with significant postoperative pelvic pain. Given the lack of available peripheral nerve blocks to the perineum, intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection could offer a potent analgesic modality for this patient population. No prior studies to date have been performed examining the analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine for these patients. Methods This retrospective case-control study aims to understand the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine for these patients with a historical comparison group of patients who did not receive intrathecal morphine. Results Fourteen patients presented for gender-affirming pelvic surgery over an eight-month period at a single institution and were offered intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia. Their analgesic results were compared to a similar historical group of 13 patients who were not offered or declined intrathecal morphine. Conclusions Intrathecal morphine injection is a potent analgesic modality for patients presenting for gender-affirming pelvic surgery.

Journeying Through the Hurdles of Gender-Affirming Care Insurance: A Literature Analysis

Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has been proven to be successful in the treatment of gender dysphoria. The benefits of providing insurance coverage for transition-related surgeries far surpass the costs of suffering from persistent gender dysphoria, including many positive health outcomes such as decreased rates of substance use, psychiatric illness, and suicide. Despite being deemed a medical necessity, discrepancies in access to treatment and insurance coverage for GAS persist. The purpose of this review is to understand the impact of limited insurance coverage on the well-being of transgender patients. A comprehensive search was conducted utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in SCOPUS and PubMed databases using the terms "insurance" AND "gender affirming surgery." Articles in non-English languages were excluded. Data related to variations in insurance coverage for GAS in the United States were collected. Of the 67 articles reviewed, 29 met the inclusion criteria. When compared to the general population, individuals who identify as transgender have higher rates of being uninsured as of 2020, with only 30 states in the United States providing insurance coverage for transgender and gender non-binary people. Of the 30 states, only 18 provide coverage for GAS, with chondrolaryngoplasty having the highest prevalence of coverage. As evidenced in our review, the persistence of complex insurance regulations impedes transgender individuals' access to equitable care. Overall, this literature review elucidates the variability in insurance coverage as it relates to gender-affirming care. Furthermore, this review highlights the need for additional health policy reforms, in addition to improving physician awareness regarding the hurdles of navigating the insurance world as a transgender patient.

Body mass index and benign breast surgeries: a survey of plastic surgeons’ knowledge and attitudes

Background

The academic literature has not arrived at a consensus on the importance of body mass index (BMI) as an indicator of surgical feasibility and risk. This study evaluates board-certified plastic surgeons' and trainees' knowledge, experiences, and concerns around performing benign breast surgeries in high-BMI patients.

Methods

An online survey instrument was developed and shared with plastic surgeons and plastic surgery trainees from December 2021 to January 2022.

Results

There were 30 respondents (18 from Israel, 11 from the United States, and 1 from Turkey). For respondents who had BMI guidelines for performing benign breast surgeries, the median maximum BMI was 35 for all procedures. Most respondents supported or strongly supported their BMI guidelines.The majority of respondents indicated that they tended to have less training and experience in performing benign breast surgeries on high-BMI patients compared to those with BMI <30. Most respondents indicated that they were less satisfied with the results of these procedures on high-BMI patients compared to those with BMI <30. The median post-operation recovery time was indicated to be similar for high-BMI patients compared to those with BMI <30 across all procedures; however, the postoperative complication rate was indicated as higher.

Conclusions

Respondents indicated that the risks of complication, more frequent need for surgical revisions, and unsatisfactory outcomes were their greatest concerns when conducting chest surgeries among high-BMI patients. Given that most surgeons practice in settings where high-BMI patients are excluded from procedure access, further research is needed to assess the extent to which these concerns reflect actual outcome differences.

Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: A systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework

BACKGROUND

This systematic review assesses racial disparities for African American (AA) women in breast reconstruction following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

METHODS

Four databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and September 2021.

RESULTS

Out of 917 screened articles, 61 were included. The most common metrics were breast reconstruction rates (57.4%) and clinical outcomes (14.8%). Pooled reconstruction rates were 45.7% in white and 38.5% in AA women. 95.1% of studies found disparities in breast reconstruction rates. The greatest influencers on reconstruction rates were individual interactions in the healthcare system (54%), sociocultural environment (39%), behavioral factors (31%), and community interactions with the healthcare system (36%).

CONCLUSION

Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist. Focusing on implicit bias, communication barriers and infrastructure are the most promising strategies to create equitable access to breast reconstruction for AA women.

Selecting a chest masculinization plastic surgeon: a survey of transgender patients

Background

Chest masculinization is a commonly performed gender-affirming procedure in transmasculine and non-binary patients and has increased in prevalence in recent years despite continued barriers to surgical care. With the expansion of insurance coverage and trained surgeons, patients at times have the opportunity to be selective in choosing their gender-affirming surgeon. This study aimed to investigate factors that transmasculine individuals consider important when selecting their chest masculinization plastic surgeon.

Methods

All patients who underwent chest masculinization with a single surgeon between January 2018 and December 2021 were surveyed via an online questionnaire to rate 21 factors associated with surgeon selection. Multiple-choice questions and free text space were included to further clarify patient preferences. Results were analyzed to rate factors in order of importance.

Results

One hundred three individuals completed the survey, generating a response rate of 49.5%. Average patient age at time of surgery was 27.0 years, and 2.0% of patients had prior gender affirmation surgery (GAS). The top five most important factors were surgeon specialization in GAS, insurance coverage, board certification, number of times surgeon has performed procedure, and availability of Before and After photographs. The five least important factors were age of surgeon, medical publications, availability of YouTube videos, location of training, and surgeon presence on social media.

Conclusions

Transmasculine patients employ distinct criteria when selecting a chest masculinization gender-affirming plastic surgeon. An improved understanding of these factors informs providers of ways to enhance patient access to information and gender-affirming care.Level of evidence: Not gradable.

Limited Access to Facial Feminization Geographically Despite Nationwide Expansion of Other Gender-Affirming Surgeries

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an integral aspect of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) for individuals seeking to align secondary sex characteristics and gender identity. Despite the importance of FFS in treating gender dysphoria, current trends and prevalence remain unknown. We sought to examine trends in GAS and FFS and investigate the payer status of facial feminization procedures in the United States.

Methods

Data was extracted from the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2017 by using International Classification of Diseases Ninth or Tenth diagnosis codes for gender identity disorder and procedure codes for FFS.

Results

From 2008 to 2017, 3015 patients underwent GAS. The yearly number of cases increased as did the average cost of GAS, which rose from $13,657 in 2008 to $50,789 in 2017. From 2015 to 2017, when FFS data was available, 110 of 1215 (9.1%) GAS patients had FFS. Most were non-Hispanic White (66.7%) or Black (23.8%). Fifty percent of FFS cases occurred in the West, followed by the Northeast (31.8%), South (13.6%), and Midwest (4.8%) (P = 0.015). By payer the cases were, 36.4% self-pay, 31.8% Medicaid, and 27.3% private insurance (P < 0.0001). Approximately, 18% of patients undergoing male-to-female transition received FFS.

Conclusions

From 2008 to 2017, GAS cases increased nationwide while the average cost of surgery rose steeply. FFS cases were primarily in the Western and Northeast United States. Despite high cost, roughly 18% of transgender women in our sample received FFS, highlighting the importance of FFS in gender transition.

Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database Analyzing Demographics, Trends, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Gender affirmation surgery is an exponentially growing field within plastic surgery. The aim of our study is to analyze demographics, procedure type, trends, and outcomes in the surgical management of gender identity disorder in the past few years.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons NSQIP database was queried for the years 2015 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify all gender-affirming cases. Patients were categorized by procedure type using Current Procedural Terminology codes for feminizing/masculinizing top, bottom and head/neck procedures. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were analyzed using SPSS statistics software. A comparative analysis was performed among the procedure type.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2019, 4114 patients underwent a gender-affirming surgery (GAS) increasing the number of surgeries by over 400%, according to the NSQIP database. Demographics include age (mean = 32 years), body mass index (mean = 28 kg/m2), race (60% White, 22% unknown, 13% African American, 4% Asian, 1% other). Female to male procedures represented the most commonly performed (n = 2647; 64%), followed by male to female (n = 1278; 31%) with head/neck procedures representing 5% (n = 189) of all procedures. Top surgeries were also the most common (n = 2347, 57%), followed by bottom surgeries (n = 1578, 38%). The overall complication rate was 6% (n = 247), 2.1% (n = 4) for head/neck procedures, 8% (n = 134) for bottom procedures, and 3.5% (n = 84) for top surgeries.A reoperation within 30 days and related to the initial GAS occurred for 52 patients. Postoperative complication rates were statistically different between bottom surgeries compared with the top and head/neck procedure groups (P < 0.001). Increasing age and body mass index showed a significantly higher odds of having a complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender-affirming procedures have significantly increased over the past 5 years. Increased exposure through literature and research, as well as an improvement in social climates, including increasing insurance coverage have contributed to the expansion of these procedures. Low serious complication rates within 30 days prove GAS to be safe.

"Postulating Penis: What Influences the Interest of Transmasculine Patients in Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction Techniques?"

BACKGROUND

The limitations of metoidioplasty and phalloplasty have been reported as deterrents for transgender and other gender expansive individuals (T/GE) desiring gender affirming surgery, and thus penile transplantation, epithesis, and composite tissue engineering (CTE) are being explored as alternative interventions.

AIM

We aim to understand the acceptability of novel techniques and factors that may influence patient preferences in surgery to best treat this diverse population.

METHODS

Descriptions of metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, epithesis, CTE, and penile transplant were delivered via online survey from January 2020 to May 2020. Respondents provided ordinal ranking of interest in each intervention from 1 to 5, with 1 representing greatest personal interest. Demographics found to be significant on univariable analysis underwent multivariable ordinal logistic regression to determine independent predictors of interest.

OUTCOMES

Sexual orientation, gender, and age were independent predictors of interest in interventions.

RESULTS

There were 965 qualifying respondents. Gay respondents were less likely to be interested in epithesis (OR: 2.282; P = .001) compared to other sexual orientations. Straight individuals were the least likely to be interested in metoidioplasty (OR 3.251; P = .001), and most interested in penile transplantation (OR 0.382; P = .005) and phalloplasty (OR 0.288, P < .001) as potential interventions. Gay and queer respondents showed a significant interest in phalloplasty (Gay: OR 0.472; P = .004; Queer: OR 0.594; P = .017). Those who identify as men were more interested in phalloplasty (OR 0.552; P < .001) than those with differing gender identities. Older age was the only variable associated with a decreased interest in phalloplasty (OR 1.033; P = .001). No demographic analyzed was an independent predictor of interest in CTE.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A thorough understanding of patient gender identity, sexual orientation, and sexual behavior should be obtained during consultation for gender affirming penile reconstruction, as these factors influence patient preferences for surgical interventions.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This study used an anonymous online survey that was distributed through community channels and allowed for the collection of a high quantity of responses throughout the T/GE population that would otherwise be impossible through single-center or in-person means. The community-based methodology minimized barriers to honesty, such as courtesy bias. The survey was only available in English and respondents skewed young and White.

CONCLUSION

Despite previously reported concerns about the limitations of metoidioplasty, participants ranked it highly, along with CTE, in terms of personal interest, with sexual orientation, gender, and age independently influencing patient preferences, emphasizing their relevance in patient-surgeon consultations. A. Parker, G. Blasdel, C. Kloer et al. "Postulating Penis: What Influences the Interest of Transmasculine Patients in Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction Techniques?". J Sex Med 2022;19:385-393.

Patients and Procedures of Facial Gender Confirmation Surgery: A NSQIP Study

ABSTRACT

Various recent developments, including legislation in 2014 banning healthcare discrimination against gender minorities, have contributed to expanding insurance coverage for gender-affirming care, which includes facial gender confirmation surgery (FGCS). Increasing evidence suggests FGCS improves quality-of-life outcomes, but literature evaluating FGCS patient demographics, surgical risk factors, procedures, and complications is limited. Therefore, the authors conducted a study of a national surgical database from 2005 to 2019 attempting to fill in these literature gaps. Statistics were used to assess temporal trends after 2014. A total of 203 FGCS cases were identified, with the earliest occurring in 2013. Case volume increased annually from 2015-2019. The average patient age was 34.0 years and racial demographics largely mirrored national estimates for the transgender/non-binary population. Obesity (20.7%) and hypertension (3.9%) were the only patient co-morbidities, although a relatively high proportion were underweight (5.4%). The majority of cases were outpatient procedures (66.5%) conducted by either plastic surgery (38.9%) or otolaryngology (61.1%). Comparing FGCSs by anatomic site, the proportion of tracheal procedures decreased between 2015-17 and 2018-19 (25.6% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.0002) whereas the proportion of brow/forehead reconstructions increased (32.6% versus 63.1%, P = 0.0005). These changes coincided with an increase in mean operative time (168.6 minutes versus 260.0, P = 0.0002). Complications were rare (3.9%), and the most common was surgical site infection (3.4%), a previously unreported outcome in the FGCS literature. Overall, FGCS patients are mostly young healthy individuals from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds, and they have few surgical complications. The increasing volume and complexity of FGCSs may be a result of expanding insurance coverage for previously unaffordable procedures.