Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcomes of Spring-Assisted Surgery versus Cranial Vault Remodeling for Sagittal Synostosis

Child-Patient Perspective on Results After Correction of Sagittal Synostosis and the Difference Between Child-Patient and Parent's Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the level of child-patient satisfaction with the surgical result after scaphocephaly correction and the difference between child-patient and parents' perspectives.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent out to children between 6 and 18 years old with isolated sagittal synostosis, who had undergone either a frontobiparietal remodeling or extended strip craniotomy, and separately to their parents.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 96 patients, 81.2% of the patients considered their head to be similar or slightly different from others. Despite the majority being satisfied with the outcome, 33% would change the shape of their head if they could. Patients who underwent extended strip craniotomy wanted to change the back of their head more often ( P = 0.002), whereas patients who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling wanted to change their forehead ( P = 0.005). The patients' own perspective on head shape was independent of the cephalic index (CI). However, patients with a relatively narrow CI received more remarks from others about their heads ( P = 0.038). Parent and child agreement was 49.7% on average. Differences between child-patients and parents were found in reporting adaptive behavior.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their intervention. The child's perspective seems to be a valuable addition to evaluate sagittal synostosis surgery as it is independent of the CI and differentiates between different surgical techniques. In addition, the patient's perspective is comparable to the parent's perspective, but gives more details on adaptive behavior.

Pediatric Cranial Vault Pathology

A wide variety of diagnoses can be approached with a common framework for diagnosis, extirpation, and reconstruction of pediatric cranial vault pathologies. Durability of reconstruction is critical for the range of pediatric patients from infancy to adolescence. Rigid reconstruction, preferably with autologous tissue when possible, promotes brain protection and satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Careful planning can allow for immediate definitive reconstruction of defects without need for further surgical intervention.

The Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 7- and 10-Year-Old Children With Metopic Synostosis

The Craniofacial Collaboration (CC-UK) is a shared initiative across the Psychology teams attached to 4 highly specialized craniofacial centers in the United Kingdom. The CC-UK aims to address key limitations in the existing craniofacial literature by analyzing data for homogenous samples of children with craniosynostosis. This article presents the fifth wave of CC-UK data collection, focused on 7- and 10-year olds who have undergone primary corrective surgery for metopic synostosis (MS). Data for children with sagittal synostosis and MS have previously been presented at 3 and 5 years. This paper continues to build on this with consideration to older age groups, presenting the first CC-UK analysis of cognitive assessment data using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition. Results show that the majority of children with MS fall within the average ranges across behavioral and neurodevelopmental domains. However, several domains indicated a trend of heightened concern when compared with normative data, particularly for parent-reported outcomes, suggesting that there may be some subtle difficulties for children with MS. Consideration of how these findings compare with that of previous CC-UK analyses is explored. Further, implications for clinical practice and future research are considered, with the need for longitudinal analyses, as well as data from multiple perspectives (eg, school, parents, and self) at older age points to establish patterns over time. Through collaboration across the highly specialized craniofacial centers, the CC-UK hopes to work toward this goal moving forward.

Radiomorphologic profiles of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis

PURPOSE

Numerous classification systems of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis (NSC) are applied but none has gained a wide acceptance, since each classification is focused on distinct aspects of cranial dysmorphology. The goal of this study was to depict the most common combinations of radiomorphologic characteristics of NSC and to separate groups where the patients were morphologically similar to one another and at the same time significantly different from others.

METHODS

The study was conducted on anonymized thin-cut CT scans of 131 children with NSC aged 1-12 months (mean age 5.42 months). The type of cranial dysmorphology was assessed using four criteria: skull shape, pattern of sagittal suture fusion, morphologic features and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces alterations. After assigning the categories, an unsupervised k-modes clustering algorithm was applied to identify distinct patients clusters representing radiomorphologic profiles determined by investigated characteristics.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis revealed three distinct radiomorphologic profiles including the most common combinations of features. The profiles were not influenced by sex nor age but were significantly determined by skull shape (V = 0.58, P < 0.0001), morphologic features (V = 0.50, P < 0.0001) and pattern of sagittal suture fusion (V = 0.47, P < 0.0001). CSF alterations did not significantly correlate with the profiles (P = 0.3585).

CONCLUSION

NSC is a mosaic of radiologic and morphologic features. The internal diversity of NSC results in dissimilar groups of patients defined by unique combinations of radiomorphologic characteristics, from which the skull shape is the most differentiating factor. Radiomorphologic profiles support the idea of clinical trials targeted at more selective outcomes assessment.

Craniometric and Aesthetic Outcomes in Craniosynostosis Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the published comparative aesthetic outcomes, and its determinants, for craniosynostoses surgically treated by minimally-invasive cranial procedures and open cranial vault remodeling (CVR).

DESIGN

PRISMA-compliant systematic review.

SETTING

Not-applicable.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Articles were included if they compared spring cranioplasty, strip minimally-invasive craniectomy or CVR for outcomes related to aesthetics or head shape. Forty-two studies were included, comprising 2402 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The craniometric and PROM used to determine surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (59%) evaluated sagittal craniosynostosis, with metopic (7;17%) and unicoronal (4;10%) the next most prevalent. Thirty-eight studies (90%) included CVR, 24 (57%) included strip craniectomy with helmeting, 9 (22%) included strip craniectomy without helmeting, 11 (26%) included spring cranioplasty, and 3 (7%) included vault distraction. A majority of studies only used 1 (43%) or 2 (14%) craniometric measures to compare techniques. In sagittal synostosis, 13 (59%) studies showed no difference in craniometric outcomes, 5 (23%) showed better results with CVR, 3 (14%) with strip craniectomy, and 1 (5%) with springs. In studies describing other synostoses, 10/14 (71%) were equivocal. Subjective outcome measures followed similar trends. Meta-analysis shows no significant difference in cranial index (CI) outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures in patients with sagittal synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in CI outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures. The majority of literature comparing craniometric and aesthetic outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures shows equivocal results for sagittal synostosis. However, the heterogeneity of data for other craniosynostoses did not allow meta-analysis.

Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Comparing Surgical Techniques Using 3D Photogrammetry

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare three surgical interventions for correction of sagittal synostosis-frontobiparietal remodeling (FBR), extended strip craniotomy (ESC), and spring-assisted correction (SAC)-based on three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry and operation characteristics.

METHODS

Patients who were born between 1991 and 2019 and diagnosed with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis who underwent FBR, ESC, or SAC and had at least one postoperative 3D photogrammetry image taken during one of six follow-up appointments until age 6 were considered for this study. Operative characteristics, postoperative complications, reinterventions, and presence of intracranial hypertension were collected. To assess cranial growth, orthogonal cranial slices and 3D photocephalometric measurements were extracted automatically and evaluated from 3D photogrammetry images.

RESULTS

A total of 322 postoperative 3D images from 218 patients were included. After correcting for age and sex, no significant differences were observed in 3D photocephalometric measurements. Mean cranial shapes suggested that postoperative growth and shape gradually normalized with higher occipitofrontal head circumference and intracranial volume values compared with normal values, regardless of type of surgery. Flattening of the vertex seems to persist after surgical correction. The authors' cranial 3D mesh processing tool has been made publicly available as a part of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that until age 6, there are no significant differences among the FBR, ESC, and SAC in their ability to correct sagittal synostosis with regard to 3D photocephalometric measurements. Therefore, efforts should be made to ensure early diagnosis so that minimally invasive surgery is a viable treatment option.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Long-term neurocognitive outcomes in 204 single-suture craniosynostosis patients

PURPOSE

Craniosynostosis, which describes premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, has been associated with a variety of neurocognitive deficits. We sought to explore the cognitive profiles of the various types of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of children 6-18 years old with surgically corrected NSC who underwent neurocognitive testing (Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visuomotor Integration) from the years 2014-2022 was conducted.

RESULTS

204 patients completed neurocognitive testing (139 sagittal, 39 metopic, 22 unicoronal, 4 lambdoid suture). 110 (54%) of the cohort was male, and 150 (74%) were White. Mean IQ was 106.10±14.01 and mean age at surgery and testing were 9.0±12.2 months and 10.9±4.0 years, respectively. Sagittal synostosis was associated with higher scores than metopic synostosis, with significant differences in verbal IQ (109.42±15.76 vs 101.37±10.41), full-scale IQ (108.32±14.44 vs 100.05±11.76), visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 92.44±12.07), visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 95.87±11.23), and motor coordination (90.45±15.60 vs 84.21±15.44). Sagittal synostosis was associated with significantly higher scores for visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 94.95±10.24) and visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 94.82±12.75) than unicoronal synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with sagittal synostosis, patients with metopic synostosis exhibited lower scores in verbal IQ, full-scale IQ, visuomotor integration, visual perception, and motor control after surgical correction. Despite surgical correction for premature metopic suture fusion, the effect on the adjacent frontal lobe and white matter connections to other regions of the brain may have a lasting functional impact. Patients with unicoronal synostosis exhibited lower visuomotor integration and visual perception scores.

Longitudinal Assessment of Neurodevelopment in Patients With Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Retrospective Review of 66 Cases

The neurodevelopmental consequences of nonsyndromic single-suture (NSS) craniosynostosis are the subject of continued debate. Although the predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) (BSID-III) have been questioned, this neurodevelopmental testing battery continues to be widely utilized among multidisciplinary craniofacial teams. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the neurodevelopmental functioning of patients with NSS craniosynostosis before and after surgical correction and the impact of surgical correction on neurodevelopmental trajectory based on BSID-III testing. All patients with NSS craniosynostosis who underwent cranial vault remodeling between 2009 and 2020 were considered for inclusion. Patients who failed to complete BSID-III testing within 2 months of surgery preoperatively and 2 years of surgery postoperatively were excluded. A total of 66 patients met criteria for the study. On language testing, both the preoperative mean score (P=0.007) and postoperative mean score (P=0.003) were significantly lower than the population norm. Furthermore, on motor testing, both the preoperative mean score (P=0.005) and postoperative mean score (P=0.001) were significantly lower than the population norm. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) testing revealed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental functioning. Overall, this study suggests that patients with NSS craniosynostosis experience modest delays in language and motor development, which are present before and after cranial vault remodeling. In addition, this study provides evidence that cranial vault remodeling does not significantly impact the neurodevelopmental trajectory. Multicenter st udies and refined neurodevelopmental testing methods are necessary to definitively establish the neurodevelopmental implications of NSS craniosynostosis.

A multi-institutional survey on calvarial vault remodeling techniques for sagittal synostosis and outcomes analysis for patients treated at 12 months and older

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis is challenging in older patients. This study aimed to assess the effect of increasing age on open surgical technique selection and patient outcomes using the multi-institutional Synostosis Research Group (SynRG) collaboration.

METHODS

Surgeons in SynRG were surveyed for key influences on their preferred open calvarial vault remodeling techniques at various patient ages: < 6, 6-12, and > 12 months. The SynRG database was then queried for open repairs of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis performed for patients older than 12 months of age. Perioperative measures, complications, and preoperative and postoperative cephalic indices were reviewed.

RESULTS

All surgeons preferred to treat patients at an earlier age, and most (89%) believed that less-optimal outcomes were achieved at ages older than 12 months. The modified pi procedure was the dominant technique in those younger than 12 months, while more involved open surgical techniques were performed for older patients, with a wide variety of open calvarial vault remodeling techniques used. Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean (± SD) age at surgery of 29 ± 16 months. Eleven patients underwent parietal reshaping, 10 parietal-occipital switch, 9 clamshell craniotomy, 7 geometric parietal expansion, 6 modified pi procedure, and 1 parietal distraction. There were no readmissions, complications, or mortality within 30 days postoperatively. Patients' cephalic indices improved a mean of 6.4% ± 4.0%, with a mean postoperative cephalic index of 74.2% ± 4.9%. Differences in postoperative cephalic index (p < 0.04) and hospital length of stay (p = 0.01) were significant between technique cohorts. Post hoc Tukey-Kramer analysis identified the parietal reshaping technique as being significantly associated with a reduced hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age is an important driver in technique selection, with surgeons selecting a more involved calvarial vault remodeling technique in older children. A variety of surgical techniques were analyzed, with the parietal reshaping technique being significantly associated with reduced length of stay; however, multiple perioperative factors may be contributory and require further analysis. When performed at high-volume centers by experienced pediatric neurosurgeons and craniofacial surgeons, open calvarial vault techniques can be a safe method for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in older children.

Management of Sagittal and Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: Open Cranial Vault Expansion and Remodeling

The prevalence of sagittal and lambdoid suture craniosynostosis differs considerably, as they are notably the most and least prevalent sutures involved in isolated suture craniosynostosis, respectively. The goals of reconstructing the cranial vault in both entities is the same: to release the fused suture, expand cranial volume, restore normal head shape and morphology, and allow for normal growth of the cranial vault. With regards to sagittal suture synostosis, opinions vary on whether reconstruction should focus on either the anterior or poster cranial vault. In contrast, the poster cranial vault is always targeted in lambdoid suture craniosynostosis.