Optimal Dosing of Prophylactic Enoxaparin after Surgical Procedures: Results of the Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled FIxed or Variable Enoxaparin (FIVE) Trial

Venous Thromboembolism after DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Review of Outcomes after a Postoperative Prophylaxis Protocol

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is among the higher-risk patient groups for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in plastic surgery. Surgeons often opt for a patient-specific approach to postoperative anticoagulation, and the field has yet to come to a consensus on VTE chemoprophylaxis regimens.

METHODS

A new chemoprophylaxis protocol was introduced starting in March of 2019 that involved 2 weeks of treatment with enoxaparin, regardless of patient risk factors. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction at the authors' institution between January of 2014 and March of 2020. Patients were grouped based on whether they enrolled in the new VTE protocol in the postoperative period or not. Patient demographics, prophylaxis type, and outcomes data were recorded, retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was postoperative VTE incidence.

RESULTS

Risk of VTE was significantly higher in patients discharged without VTE prophylaxis compared with patients discharged with prophylaxis (3.7% versus 0%; P = 0.03). Notably, zero patients in the VTE prophylaxis group developed a deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. In addition, the risk of a VTE event was 25 times greater in patients with a Caprini score greater than or equal to 6 ( P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

The authors demonstrate the successful implementation of a 2-week VTE chemoprophylaxis protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients that significantly reduces the rate of VTE while not affecting the rate of hematoma complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Unfractionated Heparins, Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins, and Indirect Factor Xa Inhibitors in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review

SUMMARY

Venous thromboembolism can present with devastating complications and sequalae, particularly in the surgical patient. Current data support prophylactic anticoagulant use in high-risk hospitalized patients, defined as those with a Caprini Risk Assessment Model score of 7 or greater. The most frequently used chemoprophylaxis agents include unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and indirect factor Xa inhibitors. The authors review the mechanisms of action, metabolism, reversal agents, indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages of these medications in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Primary prevention of venous thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparins in surgical patients – 2024: Council of Experts resolution

On March 15, 2024, in Moscow, the Russian Phlebological Association and the National Association of Specialists in Thrombosis, Clinical Hemostasiology and Hemorheology organized a meeting of the Council of Experts during the Russian Forum on Thrombosis and Hemostasis on the acute issues of venous thromboembolism (VTE) primary prevention using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in surgical patients with different body weight. The participants reviewed the relevance and prevalence of this problem in surgical practice, discussed risk factors and the frequency of VTE development, including bleeding in the postoperative period, and the Caprini risk score for complications. The discussion also focused on standard and personalized LMWH doses for primary prophylaxis of VTE in the perioperative period in surgical patients, depending on body weight, and the role of laboratory tests, including assessment of LMWH anti-Xa activity for monitoring the efficacy and safety of VTE primary prevention in clinical practice.

Impact of Reduced Enoxaparin Prophylactic Dosing on Bleeding and Thrombotic Risk for Low Body Weight Post-Operative Colorectal Surgery Patients

Introduction: Colorectal surgery (CORS) patients are at the highest risk of any general surgery population for the development of post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and are also at an increased risk for post-operative bleeding, especially with procedures related to early cancer stages. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended for VTE prophylaxis in this surgical population. Current guidelines and primary literature along with institutional protocols support dosage adjustments for obesity and impaired renal function, but literature providing optimal VTE prophylactic LMWH dosing is extremely limited for underweight, surgical patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate both bleeding and VTE rates for hospitalized underweight colorectal surgery patients receiving post-operative VTE prophylaxis with standard enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously (SQ) every 24 hours versus reduced dose enoxaparin 30 mg SQ every 24 hours. Methods: This trial was a multicenter, retrospective chart review with data collected on post-operative CORS patients over a 10-year period. Patients were included if aged 18 years and older, weighed less than 50 kg, and received at least 1 dose of enoxaparin 40 mg or 30 mg post-operatively. The primary endpoint was a descriptive comparison of post-operative bleeding with use of standard enoxaparin 40 mg SQ every 24 hours compared to reduced dose enoxaparin 30 mg SQ every 24 hours for post-operative VTE prophylaxis. The secondary endpoint was the descriptive comparison of post-operative thrombotic event rates in the same population. Results: The total population investigated included 146 patients. One hundred twenty-nine (88.4%) received standard enoxaparin and 17 (11.6%) received reduced enoxaparin. Overall, 9 bleeding events (7.0%) and 2 major VTE events (1.6%) occurred, all within the standard enoxaparin group. Conclusion: Standard dose enoxaparin for post-operative VTE prophylaxis demonstrated increased bleeding and thrombotic events requiring medical and surgical intervention in comparison to reduced dose enoxaparin for low body weight CORS patients. The results of this study are hypothesis generating and continued research involving more robust systematic reviews are needed to evaluate both safety and efficacy of reduced VTE prophylaxis with LMWH in the underweight, surgical patient population.

Association between venous thromboembolism rates and different prophylactic anticoagulation regimens in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the head and neck region

BACKGROUND

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after free tissue transfer to the head and neck (H&N). However, an optimal antithrombotic prophylaxis protocol is not defined in the literature. Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily (BID) and heparin 5000 IU three times daily (TID) are among the most commonly used regimens for chemoprophylaxis. However, no studies compare these two agents in the H&N population.

METHODS

A cohort study of patients who underwent free tissue transfer to H&N from 2012 to 2021 and received either enoxaparin 30 mg BID or Heparin 5000 IU TID postoperatively. Postoperative VTE and hematoma events were recorded within 30 days of index surgery. The cohort was divided into two groups based on chemoprophylaxis. VTE and hematoma rates were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Out of 895 patients, 737 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age and Caprini score were 60.6 [SD 12.5] years and 6.5 [SD 1.7], respectively. 234 [31.88%] were female. VTE and hematoma rates among all patients were 4.47% and 5.56%, respectively. The mean Caprini score between the enoxaparin (n = 664) and heparin (n = 73) groups was not statistically significant (6.5 ± 1.7 vs.6.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.457). The VTE rate in the enoxaparin group was significantly lower than in the heparin group (3.9% vs. 9.6%; OR: 2.602, 95% CI: 1.087-6.225). Hematoma rates were similar between the two groups (5.5% vs. 5.6%; OR: 0.982, 95% CI: 0.339-2.838).

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin 30 mg BID was associated with a lower VTE rate while maintaining a similar hematoma rate compared to heparin 5000 units TID. This association may support the use of enoxaparin over heparin for VTE chemoprophylaxis in H&N reconstruction.

Venous Thromboembolism Rates After Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck Region

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major concern for the postoperative hospitalized patient, especially after long and complex procedures. Cancer itself also contributes to the hypercoagulable state, further complicating the management of patients. Despite prophylaxis, breakthrough events can occur. We aimed to assess our institutional VTE and bleeding rates after free flap reconstruction of the head and neck (H&N) region and the factors associated with VTE events.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the patients who underwent H&N free flap reconstruction at an academic center from 2012 to 2021 was performed from a prospectively maintained database. Data regarding patient demographics, medical history, surgical details, and overall outcomes were collected. Outcomes studied included postoperative 30-day VTE rates and major bleeding events. Patients who had a VTE event were compared with the rest of the cohort to identify factors associated with VTE.

RESULTS

Free flap reconstruction of the H&N region was performed in 949 patients. Reconstruction after cancer extirpation for squamous cell carcinoma was the most common etiology (79%). The most common flap was thigh based (50%), followed by the fibula (29%). The most common postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis regimen was enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily (83%). The VTE and bleeding rates over the 10-year period were 4.6% (n = 44) and 8.7% (n = 83), respectively. Body mass index (28.7 ± 5.8 vs 26.2 ± 6.6, P = 0.013) and pulmonary comorbidities were found to be significantly higher in patients who had a VTE event (43% vs 27%, P = 0.017). Patients with a VTE event had a prolonged hospital stay of 8 more days (19.2 ± 17.4 vs 11 ± 7, P = 0.003) and a higher incidence of bleeding events (27% vs 8%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative VTE is a significant complication associated with increased length of hospitalization in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the H&N region. Institutional measures should be implemented on an individualized basis based on patient comorbidities to improve the postoperative VTE rates, while balancing the bleeding events.

Chemoprophylaxis and Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Microvascular Surgery

This review aims to highlight the common pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions utilized for thromboprophylaxis as well as flap salvage in microsurgery. A literature review was conducted in PubMed/National Center for Biotechnology Information, Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases. Articles with a focus on thromboprophylaxis in microsurgical procedures spanning head and neck surgery, breast and extremity microvascular reconstruction, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus in microvascular surgery, and flap thrombosis and salvage were included in this review. The majority of available evidence supports mechanical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in all patients undergoing microsurgery given the presence of multiple risk factors for VTE within this particular patient population. Based on the literature review, addition of VTE chemoprophylactic agents is beneficial and an algorithmic approach to thromboprophylaxis in microsurgery patients and management of patients with thrombosis based on literature review and senior authors' experience is recommended and outlined.

Pharmacological interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which comprises deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is the leading cause of preventable death in hospitalised people and the third most common cause of mortality in surgical patients. People undergoing bariatric surgery have the additional risk factor of being overweight. Although VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients is well established, the best way to prevent VTE in those undergoing bariatric surgery is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions (alone or in combination) on venous thromboembolism and other health outcomes in people undergoing bariatric surgery compared to the same pharmacological intervention administered at a different dose or frequency, the same pharmacological intervention or started at a different time point, another pharmacological intervention, no intervention or placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 1 November 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in males and females of any age undergoing bariatric surgery comparing pharmacological interventions for VTE (alone or in combination) with the same pharmacological intervention administered at a different dose or frequency, the same pharmacological intervention started at a different time point, a different pharmacological intervention, no treatment or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. VTE and 2. major bleeding. Our secondary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. VTE-related mortality, 3. PE, 4. DVT, 5. adverse effects and 6. quality of life. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with 1045 participants. Data for meta-analysis were available from all participants. Four RCTs (597 participants) compared higher-dose heparin to standard-dose heparin: one of these studies (139 participants) used unfractionated heparin (UFH) and the other three (458 participants) used low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). One study compared heparin versus pentasaccharide (198 participants), and one study compared starting heparin before versus after bariatric surgery (100 participants). One study (150 participants) compared combined mechanical and pharmacological (enoxaparin) prophylaxis versus mechanical prophylaxis alone. The duration of the interventions ranged from seven to 15 days, and follow-up ranged from 10 to 180 days. Higher-dose heparin versus standard-dose heparin Compared to standard-dose heparin, higher-dose heparin may result in little or no difference in the risk of VTE (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.99; 4 studies, 597 participants) or major bleeding (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.96; I2 = 8%; 4 studies, 597 participants; low-certainty) in people undergoing bariatric surgery. The evidence on all-cause mortality, VTE-related mortality, PE, DVT and adverse events (thrombocytopenia) is uncertain (effect not estimable or very low-certainty evidence). Heparin versus pentasaccharide Heparin compared to a pentasaccharide after bariatric surgery may result in little or no difference in the risk of VTE (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.61; 1 study, 175 participants) or DVT (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.61; 1 study, 175 participants). The evidence on major bleeding, PE and mortality is uncertain (effect not estimable or very low-certainty evidence). Heparin started before versus after the surgical procedure Starting prophylaxis with heparin 12 hours before surgery versus after surgery may result in little or no difference in the risk of VTE (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.01; 1 study, 100 participants) or DVT (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.01; 1 study, 100 participants). The evidence on major bleeding, all-cause mortality and VTE-related mortality is uncertain (effect not estimable or very low-certainty evidence). We were unable to assess the effect of this intervention on PE or adverse effects, as the study did not measure these outcomes. Combined mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis versus mechanical prophylaxis alone Combining mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis (started 12 hours before surgery) may reduce VTE events in people undergoing bariatric surgery compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.89; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 9; 1 study, 150 participants; low-certainty). We were unable to assess the effect of this intervention on major bleeding or morality (effect not estimable), or on PE or adverse events (not measured). No studies measured quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Higher-dose heparin may make little or no difference to venous thromboembolism or major bleeding in people undergoing bariatric surgery when compared to standard-dose heparin. Heparin may make little or no difference to venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery when compared to pentasaccharide. There are inadequate data to draw conclusions about the effects of heparin compared to pentasaccharide on major bleeding. Starting prophylaxis with heparin 12 hours before bariatric surgery may make little or no difference to venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery when compared to starting heparin after bariatric surgery. There are inadequate data to draw conclusions about the effects of heparin started before versus after surgery on major bleeding. Combining mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis (started 12 hours before surgery) may reduce VTE events in people undergoing bariatric surgery when compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone. No data are available relating to major bleeding. The certainty of the evidence is limited by small sample sizes, few or no events, and risk of bias concerns. Future trials must be sufficiently large to enable analysis of relevant clinical outcomes, and should standardise the time of treatment and follow-up. They should also address the effect of direct oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets, preferably grouping them according to the type of intervention.

Standard Fixed Enoxaparin Dosing for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Leads to Low Peak Anti-Factor Xa Levels in Both Head and Neck and Breast Free Flap Patients

INTRODUCTION

 Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication, particularly in cancer patients undergoing free flap reconstruction. Subcutaneous enoxaparin is the conventional prophylaxis for VTE prevention, and serum anti-factor Xa (afXa) levels are being increasingly used to monitor enoxaparin activity. In this study, free flap patients receiving standard enoxaparin prophylaxis were prospectively followed to investigate postoperative afXa levels and 90-day VTE and bleeding-related complications.

METHODS

 Patients undergoing free tissue transfer during an 8-month period were identified and prospectively followed. Patients received standard fixed enoxaparin dosing at 30 mg twice daily in head and neck (H&N) and 40 mg daily in breast reconstructions. Target peak prophylactic afXa range was 0.2 to 0.5 IU/mL. The primary outcome was the occurrence of 90-day postoperative VTE- and bleeding-related events. Independent predictors of afXa level and VTE incidence were analyzed for patients that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

 Seventy-eight patients were prospectively followed. Four (5.1%) were diagnosed with VTE, and six (7.7%) experienced bleeding-related complications. The mean afXa levels in both VTE patients and bleeding patients were subprophylactic (0.13 ± 0.09 and 0.11 ± 0.07 IU/mL, respectively). Forty-six patients (21 breast, 25 H&N) had valid postoperative peak steady-state afXa levels. Among these, 15 (33%) patients achieved the target prophylactic range: 5 (33%) H&N and 10 (67%) breast patients. The mean afXa level for H&N patients was significantly lower than for breast patients (p = 0.0021). Patient total body weight was the sole negative predictor of afXa level (R ² = 0.47, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

 Standard fixed enoxaparin dosing for postoperative VTE prophylaxis does not achieve target afXa levels for the majority of our free flap patients. H&N patients appear to be a particularly high-risk group that may require a more personalized and aggressive approach. Total body weight is the sole negative predictor of afXa level, supporting a role for weight-based enoxaparin dosing.

Genomic Analysis of Thrombophilia Variants in the General Population for the Creation of an Effective Preoperative Screening Tool

BACKGROUND

 The loss of a free flap in reconstructive microsurgery is a devastating complication in both the intraoperative and postoperative setting. Previous research has identified a variety of genetic polymorphisms that induce a hypercoagulable state and predispose patients to clot formation and subsequent free flap loss. We aim to review the risks of performing microsurgery on patients who are genetically predisposed to hypercoagulability, as well as identify options, for preoperative screening of inherited thrombophilia.

METHODS

 A thorough literature review was conducted with an online database. A total of 30 studies were reviewed to identify genetic polymorphisms that cause inherited thrombophilia. Through manual review of the literature, a table was created that included thrombotic risk factors and their associated genetic polymorphisms. If the information was available, prevalence for each thrombotic risk was also reported.

RESULTS

 Overall, 18 thrombotic risk factors that contribute to hereditary thrombophilia were identified and linked with specific genes and/or genetic polymorphisms. In studies that did not look at particular ethnic groups, 13 unique thrombotic risk factors were identified. In studies that examined specific ethnic groups exclusively, 12 thrombotic risk factors were identified and related to their respective gene or group of genes. Five of the 18 thrombotic risk factors identified were associated with increased risks of both venous and arterial thrombosis. The remainder of the thrombotic risk factors was associated with increased risk of venous thrombosis exclusively.

CONCLUSION

 The use of genetic screening tests for hereditary thrombophilia in the preoperative setting can serve as an effective preventative measure against postoperative thrombosis. Further exploration of thrombotic risk factors and their related genetic polymorphisms are important steps in reducing postoperative free flap loss.