Refining Orthognathic Surgery Results by Synchronous Cheek Fat Compartment Augmentation with Fat Grafting in Adult Females with Class III Skeletal Profiles

Extended Reduction Malarplasty for Asians with Flat and Wide Faces: Comparison with L-Shaped Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Reduction malarplasty is effective in correcting prominent zygomatic body and arch in Asian populations, but periorbital zygomatic bony protrusion may not be sufficiently improved. In this study, the authors present the extended reduction malarplasty procedures to correct it simultaneously and compare the outcome with that of conventional L-shaped osteotomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent reduction malarplasty between August of 2021 and September of 2023 at the authors' hospital was conducted. Computed tomographic images obtained before and after surgery were assessed to evaluate the facial skeletal changes, and to compare between the extended and conventional L-shaped malarplasty results.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with extended reduction malarplasty and 23 patients with conventional reduction malarplasty were eligible for the study. Cephalometric analyses showed significant reduction in the zygomatic width in both groups, but the protrusion of the periorbital area was improved significantly more in the extended reduction malarplasty group. In terms of facial angulation, the extended reduction malarplasty also provided more horizontal convexity in the periorbital area, whereas the angular change in the caudal part of the zygoma was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The extended reduction malarplasty enabled reduction of the protrusion of the periorbital area and the prominent zygomatic body and arch, and provided more 3-dimensionality and horizontal convexity with the midface contour. It is a viable option for harmonizing the facial profile for Asian patients with flat and wide faces.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Appraising mandibular prognathism in class III malocclusion following orthognathic surgery: Patient-reported and cephalometry-based outcomes

Patients with class III malocclusion often exhibit mandibular prognathism and complain of "prognathic appearance". The overall positive effects of orthognathic surgery on facial appearance have been demonstrated using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), but studies investigating the correlation between subjective PROMs results and objective measurements of imaging studies are sparse in the literature. This study recruited consecutive patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery between January 2016 and January 2021. The PROMs survey was conducted focusing on subjective perception of mandibular appearance. Lateral cephalometric images were measured to examine the correlation with the PROMs results. A total of 96 patients were eligible for this study. Of these, 74 patients (77.1%) reported complete correction of prognathic appearance postoperatively, whereas 22 patients (22.9%) perceived residual prognathic appearance. In a comparison of postoperative measurements between completely and incompletely satisfied patients, there were significant differences in SNB, ANB, convexity, facial angle, Nv-B, Nv-Pog, SN'B', soft tissue facial angle, lip-chin-throat angle, N'v-B', and N'v-Pog'. The PROM results were significantly associated with the objective measurements of imaging studies. Investigating the correlation between PROMs and objective measurements enables integration of patients' perception of the outcomes into future therapeutic strategy and surgical planning, contributing to the enhancement of patient satisfaction.

Three-dimensional Measurement of the Zygomatic-maxillary Complex in the Class III Malocclusion Patients with Maxillary Retrusion

This study investigated the anatomic features of the zygomatic-maxillary complex in patients with maxillary retrusion without clefts. Individuals were grouped, and craniofacial measurements were performed for 21 individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary retrusion (CIII) and 48 individuals from the control group (CG). We evaluated the predetermined hard-tissue and soft-tissue points of the facial profile in each group. Independent sample t -tests were performed to determine the differences between groups (significance set at P <0.05). Multiple points on the midface, including the most posterior point on the contour of the maxillary alveolar process, lowest point of the zygomaticomaxillary suture, furthest point to the zygomatic self-base plane, superior point in the infraorbital foramen, and lowest point of the inferior margin of the orbit to the coronal plane were smaller in CIII than in CG (all P <0.05). The soft tissue thickness in these regions was significantly increased compared with that in the normal group. In summary, for class III malocclusion patients with maxillary retrusion, the deficiency in the midface gradually decreased going upward, with the deficiency at the maxillary alveolar level being the most serious. To some extent, soft tissues compensate for the deficiencies in the facial skeleton, and standard Le Fort I osteotomy advancement was sufficient to achieve a harmonious appearance.

Comparison between one-jaw and two-jaw designs in virtual surgery planning for patients with class III malocclusion

Orthognathic surgery is highly effective for treating maxillomandibular discrepancies in patients with class III malocclusion. However, whether one- or two-jaw surgery should be selected remains controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate quantitative differences between one-jaw and two-jaw surgical designs. In total, 100 consecutive patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery with preoperative three-dimensional simulation between August 2016 and November 2021 were recruited. Based on the same final occlusal setup, a two-jaw surgery design and two types of one-jaw design were created. In total, 400 image sets, including preoperative images and three types of surgical simulation, were measured and compared. The one-jaw mandibular setback design led to improvement in most cephalometric measurements and facial symmetry. Although the one-jaw maxillary advancement design improved the ANB angle and facial convexity, it induced maxillary protrusion and reduced facial symmetry. Compared with the other designs, the two-jaw design provided significantly closer cephalometric measurements to the normative values, better symmetry, and less occlusal cant. Overall, the two-jaw design provided a quantitatively better facial appearance in terms of symmetry, proportion, and profile. Although an optimal surgical design necessitates thorough preoperative evaluation and a shared decision-making process, two-jaw surgery can be considered for improving overall facial esthetics and harmony.

Alloplastic malar implants in aesthetic facial surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the recent literature on aesthetic alloplastic malar implants.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alloplastic implantation is heavily favored in the oromaxillofacial literature. Recent articles have examined porous polyethylene and silicone implantation. Overall patient satisfaction is high and complications are low. Outcomes are likely comparable with alternative modalities to rejuvenate the face in the appropriate hands.

SUMMARY

Alloplastic implantation continues to be a reliable tool for malar augmentation.