1
|
Sanders JE, Vamos AC, Mertens JC, Allyn KJ, Larsen BG, Ballesteros D, Wang H, DeGrasse NS, Garbini JL, Hafner BJ, Friedly JL. An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11168. [PMID: 38750086 PMCID: PMC11096356 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
It is essential that people with limb amputation maintain proper prosthetic socket fit to prevent injury. Monitoring and adjusting socket fit, for example by removing the prosthesis to add prosthetic socks, is burdensome and can adversely affect users' function and quality-of-life. This study presents results from take-home testing of a motor-driven adaptive socket that automatically adjusted socket size during walking. A socket fit metric was calculated from inductive sensor measurements of the distance between the elastomeric liner surrounding the residual limb and the socket's inner surface. A proportional-integral controller was implemented to adjust socket size. When tested on 12 participants with transtibial amputation, the controller was active a mean of 68% of the walking time. In general, participants who walked more than 20 min/day demonstrated greater activity, less doff time, and fewer manual socket size adjustments for the adaptive socket compared with a locked non-adjustable socket and a motor-driven socket that participants adjusted with a smartphone application. Nine of 12 participants reported that they would use a motor-driven adjustable socket if it were available as it would limit their socket fit issues. The size and weight of the adaptive socket were considered the most important variables to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan E Sanders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Andrew C Vamos
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Joseph C Mertens
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katheryn J Allyn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian G Larsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Daniel Ballesteros
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Horace Wang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Nicholas S DeGrasse
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Joseph L Garbini
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, 3900 E Stevens Way NE, Box 352600, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356490, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Janna L Friedly
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359612, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Chu J, Song J, Li Z. The application of impantable sensors in the musculoskeletal system: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1270237. [PMID: 38328442 PMCID: PMC10847584 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1270237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
As the population ages and the incidence of traumatic events rises, there is a growing trend toward the implantation of devices to replace damaged or degenerated tissues in the body. In orthopedic applications, some implants are equipped with sensors to measure internal data and monitor the status of the implant. In recent years, several multi-functional implants have been developed that the clinician can externally control using a smart device. Experts anticipate that these versatile implants could pave the way for the next-generation of technological advancements. This paper provides an introduction to implantable sensors and is structured into three parts. The first section categorizes existing implantable sensors based on their working principles and provides detailed illustrations with examples. The second section introduces the most common materials used in implantable sensors, divided into rigid and flexible materials according to their properties. The third section is the focal point of this article, with implantable orthopedic sensors being classified as joint, spine, or fracture, based on different practical scenarios. The aim of this review is to introduce various implantable orthopedic sensors, compare their different characteristics, and outline the future direction of their development and application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinzuo Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Mechanism for Repair and Remodeling of Orthopaedic Diseases, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Jian Chu
- Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Jinhui Song
- Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Zhonghai Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Mechanism for Repair and Remodeling of Orthopaedic Diseases, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krout AJ, Weissinger MJ, Mertens JC, Allyn KJ, Larsen BG, McCarthy NK, Garbini JL, Sanders JE. Distal weight bearing in transtibial prosthesis users wearing pin suspension. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2023; 4:1322202. [PMID: 38192637 PMCID: PMC10773776 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1322202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Low-level distal weight bearing in transtibial prosthesis users may help maintain perfusion and improve both proprioception and residual limb tissue health. Methods The primary objectives of this research were to develop a sensor to continuously measure distal weight bearing, evaluate how prosthesis design variables affected weight bearing levels, and assess fluctuations in distal weight bearing during at-home and community use. Results In-lab testing on a small group of participants wearing adjustable sockets demonstrated that if distal contact was present, when socket size was increased distal weight bearing increased and when socket size was reduced distal weight bearing decreased. During take-home use, participants accepted the distal weight bearing level set by the research team. It ranged between 1.1% and 6.4% BW for all days tested. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) ranged from 25% to 43% and was expected due in part to differences in walking style, speed, terrain, direction of ambulation, and bout duration. Two participants commented that they preferred presence of distal weight bearing to non-presence. Discussion Next steps in this research are to develop clinical practices to determine target distal weight bearing levels and ranges, and to simplify the design of the sensor and weight bearing adjustment mechanism for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. Krout
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Mathew J. Weissinger
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Joseph C. Mertens
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Katheryn J. Allyn
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Brian G. Larsen
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Nicholas K. McCarthy
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Joseph L. Garbini
- Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Joan E. Sanders
- Sanders Prosthetic and Orthotic Science & Technology Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ballesteros D, Youngblood RT, Vamos AC, Garbini JL, Allyn KJ, Hafner BJ, Larsen BG, Ciol MA, Friedly JL, Sanders JE. Cyclic socket enlargement and reduction during walking to minimize limb fluid volume loss in transtibial prosthesis users. Med Eng Phys 2022; 103:103787. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|