Comparison of HBV-active HAART regimens in an HIV-HBV multinational cohort: outcomes through 144 weeks

What does the scale-up of long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis mean for the global hepatitis B epidemic?

INTRODUCTION

The HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) epidemics are interconnected with shared routes of transmission and specific antiviral drugs that are effective against both viruses. Nearly, 300 million people around the world live with chronic HBV, many of whom are from priority populations who could benefit from HIV prevention services. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV has implications in the prevention and treatment of HBV infection, but many people at increased risk of HIV acquisition may instead prefer long-acting formulations of PrEP, which are currently not active against HBV.

DISCUSSION

People at increased risk for HIV acquisition may also be at risk for or already be living with HBV infection. Oral PrEP with tenofovir is effective in preventing both HIV and HBV, and tenofovir is also the recommended treatment for chronic HBV infection. Although implementation of oral PrEP has been challenging in sub-Saharan Africa, investments in its scale-up could secondarily reduce the clinical impact of HBV. Long-acting PrEP, including injectable medicines and implantable rings, may overcome some of the implementation challenges associated with oral PrEP, such as daily pill burden, adherence challenges and stigma; however, current formulations of long-acting PrEP do not have activity against HBV replication. Ideally, PrEP programmes would offer both oral and long-acting formulations with HBV screening to optimize HIV prevention services and HBV prevention and care, when appropriate. People who are not immune to HBV would benefit from being vaccinated against HBV before initiating long-acting PrEP. People who remain non-immune to HBV despite vaccination may benefit from being offered oral, tenofovir-based PrEP given its potential for HBV PrEP. People using PrEP and living with HBV who are not linked to dedicated HBV care would also benefit from laboratory monitoring at PrEP sites to ensure safety when using and after stopping tenofovir. PrEP programmes are ideal venues to offer HBV screening, HBV vaccination for people who are non-immune and treatment with tenofovir-based PrEP for people with indications for HBV therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting PrEP holds promise for reducing HIV incidence, but its implications for the HBV epidemic, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, should not be overlooked.

Comparison of Antiretroviral Therapies in Pregnant Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis B Virus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To describe the anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) efficacy, HBeAg serologic changes, HBV perinatal transmission, and safety in pregnant women who are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV co-infection who were randomized to various antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens.

METHODS

The PROMISE (Promoting Maternal and Infant Survival Everywhere) trial was a multicenter randomized trial for ART-naive pregnant women with HIV infection. Women with HIV and HBV co-infection at 14 or more weeks of gestation were randomized to one of three ART arms: one without HBV treatment (group 1) and two HBV treatment arms with single (group 2) or dual anti-HBV activity (group 3). The primary HBV outcome was HBV viral load antepartum change from baseline (enrollment) to 8 weeks; safety assessments included alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, and anemia (hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL). Primary comparison was for the HBV-active treatment arms. Pairwise comparisons applied t test and the Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Of 3,543 women, 3.9% were HBsAg-positive; 42 were randomized to group 1, 48 to group 2, and 48 to group 3. Median gestational age at enrollment was 27 weeks. Among HBV-viremic women, mean antepartum HBV viral load change at week 8 was -0.26 log 10 international units/mL in group 1, -1.86 in group 2, and -1.89 in group 3. In those who were HBeAg-positive, HBeAg loss occurred in 44.4% at delivery. Two perinatal HBV transmissions occurred in group 2. During the antepartum period, one woman (2.4%) in group 1 had grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations, two women (4.2%) in group 2, and three women (6.3%) in group 3.

CONCLUSION

Over a short period of time, HBV DNA suppression was not different with one or two HBV-active agents. HbeAg loss occurred in a substantial proportion of participants. Perinatal transmission of HBV infection was low. Hepatitis B virus-active ART was well-tolerated in pregnancy, with few grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01061151.

High frequency of Lamivudine and Telbivudine resistance mutations in hepatitis B virus isolates from human immunodeficiency virus co-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy in Bucaramanga, Colombia

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) antiviral Resistance-Associated Mutations (RAMs) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfected patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) are complex and incompletely understood. We aimed to determine the prevalence of HBV coinfection, HBV genotypes, and RAMs in a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the northeastern region of Colombia. This cross-sectional study was carried out between February 2013 and February 2014. Virological, immunological and HAART data were collected from clinical records. In-house nested PCR and Sanger sequencing of the HBV pol gene were used to identify coinfections, genotypes, RAMs and HBV s antigen (HBsAg) escape mutants. Among 275 PLWH, HBV coinfection was confirmed in 32 patients (11.6%), of whom nine (28.2%) were HBsAg positive (active hepatitis B), and 23 (71.8%) were occult hepatitis B infections (OBI). All HBV sequences (n = 23) belonged to the genotype F3. Among HIV/HBV coinfections, 71.9% had CD4+ T cell counts above 200 cells/mm3 and 37.5% had undetectable HIV viral loads. The RAMs rtL80I, rtL180M, and rtM204V, which confer resistance to Lamivudine/Telbivudine and partially resistant to Entecavir, were found in all HBV isolates. An unknown rt236Y mutation to Tenofovir was also identified. Most patients under HAART received first-generation HBV antiviral therapy with a low genetic barrier to resistance. Antiviral Drug-associated Potential Vaccine-escape Mutations (ADAPVEMs) in the S gene were observed in all isolates ranging from 1-20 amino acid substitutions. However, no vaccine escape mutants were detected. In Conclusion, these findings highlight the importance of HBV molecular screening, antiviral resistance monitoring and new guidelines for PLWH to overcome RAMs and prevent HBV-related liver disease.

Hepatitis B Virus Research in South Africa

Despite being vaccine-preventable, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains the seventh leading cause of mortality in the world. In South Africa (SA), over 1.9 million people are chronically infected with HBV, and 70% of all Black chronic carriers are infected with HBV subgenotype A1. The virus remains a significant burden on public health in SA despite the introduction of an infant immunization program implemented in 1995 and the availability of effective treatment for chronic HBV infection. In addition, the high prevalence of HIV infection amplifies HBV replication, predisposes patients to chronicity, and complicates management of the infection. HBV research has made significant progress leading to better understanding of HBV epidemiology and management challenges in the SA context. This has led to recent revision of the national HBV infection management guidelines. Research on developing new vaccines and therapies is underway and progress has been made with designing potentially curative gene therapies against HBV. This review summarizes research carried out in SA on HBV molecular biology, epidemiology, treatment, and vaccination strategies.

Hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B RNA changes in HIV/hepatitis B virus co-infected participants receiving hepatitis B virus-active antiretroviral therapy

INTRODUCTION

With advances in hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapies, there is a need to identify serum biomarkers that assess the HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) reservoir and predict functional cure in HIV/HBV co-infection.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, combining samples from HIV/HBV co-infected participants enrolled in two ACTG interventional trials, proportions achieving HBsAg less than 0.05 log10 IU/ml and HBV RNA less than log10 1.65 U/ml or not detected (LLoQ/NEG) in response to DUAL [tenofovir TDF+emtricitabine (FTC)] vs. MONO [FTC or lamivudine (3TC)] HBV-active ART, were measured. Predictors of qHBsAg less than 0.05 log10 IU/ml were evaluated in logistic regression models.

RESULTS

There were 88 participants [58% women, median age 34; 47 on DUAL vs. 41 on MONO HBV-active ART]. Twenty-one percent achieved HBsAg less than 0.05 log10 IU/ml (30% DUAL vs. 10% MONO). Time to HBsAg less than 0.05 log10 IU/ml was lower (P  = 0.02) and the odds of achieving HBsAg less than 0.05 log10 IU/ml were higher (P = 0.07) in DUAL participants. HBV RNA became less than LLoQ/NEG in 47% (DUAL 60% vs. MONO 33%). qHBsAg less than 3 log10 IU/ml was the strongest predictor of HBsAg less than 0.05 log10 IU/ml.

CONCLUSION

This study supports current recommendations of TDF-based DUAL-HBV active ART for initial use in HIV/HBV co-infection. HBV RNA could be a useful marker of treatment response in HIV/HBV co-infected patients on HBV-active ART.

Functional Cure of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Individuals With HIV-Coinfection: A Literature Review

In individuals infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the ultimate therapeutic goal, which defines "functional cure." For individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), functional cure occurs roughly 2 per 100 person-years during potent anti-HBV containing antiretroviral therapy. Although this rate may be higher than expected in treated HBV mono-infected individuals, rates of functional cure widely vary between studies (0.6-10.5 per 100 person-years). Similar to HBV mono-infection, the phase of HBV infection, HBV (sub-)genotypes and hepatitis B "e" Ag-negative variants are associated with functional cure in treated HIV-HBV co-infection. In specifically HIV-HBV co-infected individuals, strong increases in CD4+ T cell counts after treatment initiation have also been linked to functional cure, yet this finding is inconsistent across studies. Several markers directly or indirectly reflecting HBV activity are being developed to predict functional cure, such as quantification of HBsAg, hepatitis B core-related antigen, HBsAg protein composition, anti-hepatitis B core antibodies and interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10. Few have been assessed during treatment in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals and none have been validated to predict functional cure. Novel therapeutics for HBV cure are essential for individuals with HIV-HBV co-infection and need to be separately evaluated in this population.

New Insights on Long-Term Hepatitis B Virus Responses in HIV-Hepatitis B virus Co-infected Patients: Implications for Antiretroviral Management in Hepatitis B virus-Endemic Settings

BACKGROUND

WHO treatment guidelines recommend tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone in first-line regimens for HIV-infected adults. Lamivudine alone is not recommended, because of the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistance. We studied HBV responses in a large cohort of co-infected patients in a resource-limited setting.

SETTING

Clinical centers in Uganda and Zimbabwe.

METHODS

DART was a randomized trial of monitoring practices in HIV-infected adults starting antiretroviral therapy. Baseline samples were tested retrospectively for HBV serological markers and HBV DNA. Longitudinal HBV DNA testing at 48 weeks and the last available sample before HBV-relevant modification of antiretroviral therapy was performed on patients with detectable HBV DNA at baseline.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-four hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients were followed for up to 4.8 years. Of the drugs with anti-HBV activity, 166 were prescribed lamivudine-tenofovir and 58 lamivudine alone. Ninety-eight percent (96/98) patients with baseline HBV DNA <6 log10 IU/mL achieved viral suppression at 48 weeks (HBV DNA <48 IU/mL), regardless of regimen, compared with 50%(26/52) for HBV DNA >6 log10 IU/mL. Of the 83 patients suppressed at 48 weeks and with follow-up data, only 7(8%) experienced viral rebound (range 200-3460 IU/mL). Of the 20 patients not suppressed at 48 weeks and with follow-up data, HBV DNA levels generally declined with lamivudine-tenofovir, but increased with lamivudine alone. Alanine transaminase flares were not observed in any patient who experienced viral rebound.

CONCLUSIONS

The suppressive effect of lamivudine alone was highly durable (up to 5 years) in HIV-HBV co-infected patients with baseline HBV DNA <6 log10 IU/mL. It may be feasible to develop stratified approaches using lamivudine as the only drug with anti-HBV activity.

Impact of Lamivudine-Based Antiretroviral Treatment on Hepatitis B Viremia in HIV-Coinfected South Africans

This prospective study investigated the impact of lamivudine-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) on HIV-positive patients in South Africa with baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Follow-up samples from 56 HBV/HIV co-infected patients, 25 with occult HBV infection (OBI) and 31 with chronic HBV infection (CHB), were available for analysis. HBV viral loads were quantified at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-ART initiation by the COBAS TaqMan HBV Test 48 assay, and the HBV polymerase gene was amplified with an in-house nested polymerase chain reaction assay. During 24 months of lamivudine-based ART, 6 of 8 (75%) OBI and 4 of 6 (67%) CHB patients achieved undetectable levels of HBV DNA, while 2 patients had persistent HBV DNA levels ≥ 2 × 10⁵ despite lamivudine-based ART for 24 months. HIV viremia was undetectable in all patients at 12 months, suggesting high adherence to ART. Several lamivudine-associated HBV resistance mutations, including L180M, A181T, M204I, and M204V, were observed. Sequence analysis also revealed a rare genotype G infection. While resource-limited settings may use lamivudine-based ART because of availability and low cost, antivirals with dual therapy against HBV and HIV (e.g., lamivudine and tenofovir) should always be recommended with the regular monitoring of HBV viremia levels.

The treatment outcome of chronic HBV infection among HBV/HIV co-infected and HBV mono-infected patients

The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment response of hepatitis B virus (HBV) to lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HBV/HIV co-infected patients in comparison to HBV mono-infected patients. This study was conducted at the University Hospital for Infectious and Tropical Diseases in Belgrade from January 2000 until December 2017 and included all patients with chronic hepatitis B who received antiviral therapy. All patients initially treated with lamivudine were switched to tenofovir if lamivudine failure occurred. A patient was considered to have achieved a full treatment response if the level of HBV DNA was lower than 20 IU/ml or undetectable. HBs and HBe antigen loss and HBs seroconversion were also monitored. After a mean duration of lamivudine-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) of 4.87 ± 3.48 years and lamivudine mono-therapy of 4 ± 2.52 years, failure was recorded in 82.1% and 79.3% of patients, respectively. HBV viral loads were 20 ± 32 IU/ml and 3 ± 13 IU/ml after 2.49 ± 1.56 years of tenofovir-containing ART and 1.9 ± 1.13 years of tenofovir mono-therapy, respectively. Overall mean treatment duration, taking both lamivudine- and tenofovir-based regimens into account, was 4.18 ± 2.72 and 6.17 ± 3.63 years in the mono- and co-infected patients, respectively ( p = 0.02).

Long-term virological and serologic responses of chronic hepatitis B virus infection to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimens in patients with HIV and hepatitis B coinfection

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the durability of HBV viral suppression with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) combined with lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients are scarce in hyperendemic areas of chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2016, HIV/HBV-coinfected Taiwanese with available baseline HBV DNA load were retrospectively reviewed. Determinations of plasma HBV DNA load, HBV serologic markers (HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, and anti-HBe), and liver function were performed after initiation of cART. Factors associated with time to undetectable HBV DNA load were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 366 patients were included according to cART history: Group 1, 3TC as the only anti-HBV therapy (n = 73); Group 2, TDF-containing cART as initial therapy (n = 127); and Group 3, switch of 3TC-based to TDF-containing cART (n = 166). At year 5, HBV suppression was achieved in 77.8%, 95.7%, and 95.7% of Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, TDF ( ± 3TC or FTC) but not 3TC alone as initial anti-HBV therapy was significantly associated with HBV suppression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.635; 95% CI 1.720-4.037), while HBeAg positivity at baseline was associated with failure to achieve HBV suppression (aHR 0.293; 95% CI 0.178-0.482). Loss of HBsAg occurred in 15 patients (4.1%), with 7 (1.9%) seroconversion to anti-HBs positivity, while HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 11 (16.9%) of 65 HBeAg-positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-containing cART achieved durable HBV viral suppression in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients and HBeAg positivity at baseline was associated with failure to achieve HBV suppression despite long-term TDF-containing cART.

Precore G1896A mutation is associated with reduced rates of HBsAg seroclearance in treated HIV hepatitis B virus co-infected patients from Western Africa

The nucleotide substitution G1896A on the precore (pc) region has been implicated in virological and serological responses during treatment in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients. Whether this mutation affects the therapeutic course of HIV-HBV co-infected patients, especially from Western Africa, is unknown. In this prospective cohort study, 86 antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve HIV-HBV co-infected patients from Côte d'Ivoire, initiating ARV-treatment containing lamivudine (n = 53) or tenofovir (n = 33), had available baseline pc sequences. Association of the pcG1896A mutation with time to undetectable HBV-DNA, hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance (in HBeAg-positive patients), and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. At ARV-initiation, median HBV-DNA was 6.04 log₁₀ copies/mL (IQR = 3.70-7.93) with 97.7% harbouring HBV genotype E. Baseline pcG1896A mutation was identified in 51 (59.3%) patients, who were more commonly HBeAg-negative (P < .001) and had basal core promotor A1762T/G1764A mutations (P < .001). Patients were followed for a median 36 months (IQR = 24-36). Cumulative proportion of undetectable HBV-DNA was significantly higher in patients with baseline mutation (pcG1896A = 86.6% vs no pcG1896A = 66.9%, P = .04), but not after adjusting for baseline HBV-DNA levels and anti-HBV agent (P = .2). No difference in cumulative proportion of HBeAg seroclearance was observed between mutation groups (pcG1896A = 57.1% vs no pcG1896A = 54.3%, P = .7). Significantly higher cumulative proportion of HBsAg seroclearance was observed in patients without this mutation (pcG1896A = 0% vs no pcG1896A = 36.9%, P < .001), even after adjusting for baseline HBsAg quantification and anti-HBV agent (P < .001). In conclusion, lacking the pcG1896A mutation before ARV initiation appeared to increase HBsAg seroclearance rates during treatment. The therapeutic implications of this mutation need further exploration in this setting.

HBV and HIV viral load but not microbial translocation or immune activation are associated with liver fibrosis among patients in South Africa

Background

Co-infection with HIV negatively impacts the progression of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, including causing rapid progression to liver fibrosis. Sub-Saharan Africa represents arguably the most important intersection of high endemicity of both chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and HIV infection.

Methods

We recruited 46 HBV/HIV-co-infected; 47 HBV-monoinfected; 39 HIV-monoinfected; and 37 HBV/HIV-uninfected patients from Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. All HIV-infected patients were on antiretroviral therapy for ≥3 months. Liver stiffness measurements were assessed using the Fibroscan (Fibroscan 402, Echosens). Cell-based immunomarkers were measured by flow cytometry. Soluble serum/plasma immunomarkers were measured by Luminex technology and enzyme immunoassays. HIV (COBAS/Ampliprep TaqMan HIV-1) and HBV viral loads (in-house assay) were also performed.

Results

HBV/HIV co-infected patients showed significantly higher levels of immune activation %CD8+/HLA-DR+/CD38+ (median 30%, interquartile range: 17–53) and %CD8+/PD-1 (median 22%, interquartile range: 15–33), p ≤ 0.01 compared to all other study groups. Despite this, the HBV-mono-infected group had the highest proportion of patients with advanced liver fibrosis (≥13 kPa) as measured by Fibroscan (18%). HBV mono-infected patients showed highest expression of most cytokines including IL-17 and basic fibroblastic growth factor. There was significant positive correlation between detectable HIV and HBV viral replication and liver fibrosis but not immune activation or gut translocation.

Discussion

Highly-active antiretroviral therapy, including tenofovir, is effective against both HIV and HBV. Earlier therapy in the co-infected patients may therefore have controlled viral replication leading to better fibrosis scores when compared to HBV mono-infection in this study. On-going HBV and HIV viraemia, rather than microbial translocation or immune activation, appear to be the drivers of liver fibrosis. Moderate to advanced liver fibrosis in HBV-mono-infection may well indicate poor access to screening and treatment of HBV infection.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3115-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prevalence and Evolution of Renal Impairment in People Living With HIV in Rural Tanzania

Background

We assessed the prevalence, incidence, and predictors of renal impairment among people living with HIV (PLWHIV) in rural Tanzania.

Methods

In a cohort of PLWHIV aged ≥15 years enrolled from January 2013 to June 2016, we assessed the association between renal impairment (estimated glomerural filtration rate < 90 mL/min/1.73 m²) at enrollment and during follow-up with demographic and clinical characteristcis using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Of 1093 PLWHIV, 172 (15.7%) had renal impairment at enrollment. Of 921 patients with normal renal function at baseline, 117 (12.7%) developed renal impairment during a median follow-up (interquartile range) of 6.2 (0.4–14.7) months. The incidence of renal impairment was 110 cases per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 92–132). At enrollment, logistic regression identified older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.52–2.11), hypertension (aOR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.08–3.15), CD4 count <200 cells/mm³ (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23–2.65), and World Health Organization (WHO) stage III/IV (aOR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.96–4.58) as risk factors for renal impairment. Cox regression model confirmed older age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.56–2.20) and CD4 count <200 cells/mm³ (aHR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.36–3.09) to be associated with the development of renal impairment.

Conclusions

Our study found a low prevalence of renal impairment among PLWHIV despite high usage of tenofovir and its association with age, hypertension, low CD4 count, and advanced WHO stage. These important and reassuring safety data stress the significance of noncommunicable disease surveillance in aging HIV populations in sub-Saharan Africa.

Hepatitis B serological markers and plasma DNA concentrations

Objectives:

To examine hepatitis B (HBV) serological markers and plasma DNA concentrations in a large group of untreated HBV/HIV-coinfected individuals in two sub-Saharan settings.

Design:

Baseline analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Methods:

DART was a large trial of treatment monitoring practices in HIV-infected adults with advanced disease starting antiretroviral therapy at centres in Kampala or Entebbe, Uganda (n = 2317) and Harare, Zimbabwe (n = 999). HBV serological markers [antibody to HBV core antigen, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to HBV surface antigen, HBV ‘e’ antigen (HBeAg), and antibody to hepatitis B ‘e’ antigen] and plasma HBV DNA viral load were measured retrospectively on stored baseline samples. Logistic regression was used to examine associations with baseline demographic and clinical factors.

Results:

The rate of HBsAg positivity was significantly higher in Zimbabwe than Uganda (12.2 vs. 7.7%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.54, P < 0.001) despite a similar prevalence of antibody to HBV core antigen (56.3 vs. 52.4%) in the two settings. Overall, HBsAg positivity was associated with male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54, P < 0.001) but not with age, WHO disease stage, or CD4⁺ cell count. HBeAg was detected among 37% of HBsAg-positive patients, with higher rates among those with advanced WHO stage (P = 0.02). Also in HBsAg-positive patients, HBV DNA was undetectable in 21%, detectable but below the level of quantification in 14%, and quantifiable in 65%. A total of 96% of HBeAg-positive and 70% of HBeAg-negative patients had detectable HBV DNA; 92 and 28% of patients, respectively, had HBV DNA viral load more than 2000 IU/ml.

Conclusion:

High rates of HBV coinfection were observed, highlighting the importance of ensuring that coinfected patients receive an antiretroviral regimen, whether first-line or not, that is active against both viruses.

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Load Response to 2 Antiviral Regimens, Tenofovir/Lamivudine and Lamivudine, in HIV/ HBV-Coinfected Pregnant Women in Guangxi, China: The Tenofovir in Pregnancy (TiP) Study

BACKGROUND

 There is limited information on antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among pregnant women coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV.

METHODS

 A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of a regimen containing tenofovir (TDF)/lamivudine (3TC) and a regimen containing 3TC in HIV/HBV-coinfected pregnant women in China. The HBV virological response was compared in study arms.

RESULTS

 The median decline in the HBV DNA level was 2.60 log10 copies/mL in the TDF/3TC arm and 2.24 log10 copies/mL in the 3TC arm (P = .41). All women achieved HBV DNA levels of <6 log10 copies/mL at delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

 Initiation of either regimen led to achievement of HBV DNA levels below the threshold associated with perinatal HBV transmission.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

 NCT01125696.

Lamivudine Monotherapy-Based cART Is Efficacious for HBV Treatment in HIV/HBV Coinfection When Baseline HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL

BACKGROUND

Although combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) including tenofovir (TDF)+lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) is recommended for treatment of HIV/HBV coinfected patients, TDF is unavailable in some resource-limited areas. Some data suggest that 3TC monotherapy-based cART may be effective in patients with low pretreatment HBV DNA.

METHODS

Prospective study of 151 Chinese HIV/HBV coinfected subjects of whom 60 received 3TC-based cART and 91 received TDF+3TC-based cART. Factors associated with HBV DNA suppression at 24 and 48 weeks, including anti-HBV drugs, baseline HBV DNA, and baseline CD4 cell count, were evaluated overall and stratified by baseline HBV DNA using Poisson regression with a robust error variance.

RESULTS

Baseline HBV DNA ≥20,000 IU/mL was present in 48.3% and 44.0% of subjects in the 3TC and TDF groups, respectively (P = 0.60). After 48 weeks of treatment, HBV DNA suppression rates were similar between these 2 groups (96.8% vs. 98.0% for 3TC and TDF+3TC, P > 0.999) in subjects with baseline HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL; whereas in those with baseline HBV DNA ≥20,000 IU/mL, TDF+3TC was associated with higher suppression rates (34.5% vs. 72.5% in 3TC and TDF+3TC groups, respectively, P = 0.002). In stratified multivariate regression, TDF use (RR 1.98, P = 0.010) and baseline HBV DNA (per 1 log increase in International Units Per Milliliter, RR 0.74, P < 0.001) were associated with HBV DNA suppression only when baseline HBV DNA ≥20,000 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that 3TC monotherapy-based cART is efficacious for HBV treatment through 48 weeks in HIV/HBV coinfection when baseline HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL. Studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to determine if this finding persists.

Molecular epidemiology of co-infection with hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among adult patients in Harare, Zimbabwe

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of co-infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the genetic characteristics of both viruses among pre-HIV-treatment patients in Harare, Zimbabwe. This cross-sectional survey involved 176 remnant plasma samples collected from consenting HIV patients (median age 35 [18-74]) between June and September 2014. HBV seromarkers were determined by high-sensitivity chemiluminescence assays. Molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted on the basal core promoter/precore (BCP/PC) and S regions of HBV, as well as part of the HIV pol region. Of the 176 participants (65.7% female), 19 (10.8%) were positive for HBsAg (median 0.033 IU/ml (IQR 0.01-415). The HBsAg incidence was higher in men than women (P = 0.009). HBsAg-positive subjects had lower median CD4 counts (P = 0.016). HBV DNA was detectable in 12 HBsAg-positive samples (median 3.36 log cp/ml (2.86-4.51), seven being amplified and sequenced. All isolates were subgenotype A1 without HBV drug resistance mutations but each had at least one BCP/PC mutation. PreS deletion mutants and small S antigen variants M133I/T and D144G were identified. Of the 164 HIV isolates successfully genotyped, 163 (99.4%) were HIV-1 subtype C and only one was HIV-1 subtype F1. Sixteen (9.8%) had at least one drug resistance mutation, predominantly non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-related mutations, observed mostly among female participants. This study shows that co-infection with HBV is present among HIV patients enrolling into HIV care in Zimbabwe, suggesting that HBV screening and monitoring programmes be strengthened in this context. J. Med. Virol. 89:257-266, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.