Unveiling the basis of antiretroviral therapy-induced osteopenia: the effects of Dolutegravir, Darunavir and Atazanavir on osteogenesis

The anti-HIV drug abacavir stimulates β-catenin activity in osteoblast lineage cells

Bone mineral density (BMD) loss in people living with HIV occurs with the initiation of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), particularly with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) containing cART. Switching from TDF to abacavir (ABC) or dolutegravir (DTG) leads to increased BMD. Whether BMD gains are due to cessation of TDF or anabolic effects of ABC or DTG is unclear. We investigated the effects of ABC and DTG on osteoblast lineage cells in vitro and in vivo. Primary human osteoblasts and male C57BL/6 mice were treated with individual antiretrovirals (ARVs) or a combination of ABC/DTG/lamivudine (3TC). Nearly all ARVs and cART inhibited osteogenic activity in vitro. Due to the importance of Wnt/β-catenin in bone formation, we further investigated ARV effects on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. ABC, alone and as part of ABC/DTG/3TC, increased osteoblastic β-catenin activity as indicated by increased TOPFlash activity, hypo-phosphorylated (active) β-catenin staining, and β-catenin targeted gene expression. Mice treated with TDF had decreased lumbar spine BMD and trabecular connectivity density in the vertebrae, while those treated with ABC/DTG/3TC reduced cortical area and thickness in the femur. Mice treated with ABC alone had no bone structural changes, increased circulating levels of the bone formation marker, P1NP, and elevated expression of the Wnt/β-catenin target gene, Lef1, in osteocyte enriched samples. Further, bones from ARV-treated mice were isolated to evaluate ARV distribution. All ARVs were detected in the bone tissue, which was inclusive of bone marrow, but when bone marrow was removed, only TDF, ABC, and DTG were detected at ~0.1% of the circulating levels. Overall, our findings demonstrate that ABC activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling, but whether this leads to increased bone formation requires further study. Assessing the impact of ARVs on bone is critical to informing ARV selection and/or discovery of regimens that do not negatively impact the skeleton.

Adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells under tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and integrase strand transfer inhibitors selective challenge: an in-vitro model

OBJECTIVE

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are a class of antiretroviral therapy (ART) medications with a good tolerability profile and a high genetic barrier to HIV drug resistance. However, several studies report significant weight gain among persons receiving INSTI-based ART regimens compared with other regimens.

DESIGN

In-vitro model of adipogenesis.

METHODS

We used 3T3-L1 cells to investigate the effects of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), alone or in combination with INSTIs: raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (ELV), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) on adipose differentiation. To monitor adipocyte differentiation, expression levels of PPARɣ and C/EBPα and the intracellular lipid accumulation by Red Oil staining were used. Furthermore, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of ER-TR7, a fibroblastic marker, after INSTIs treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with control, INSTIs were able to increase adipogenesis, especially RAL and ELV. TAF and TDF inhibited adipogenesis alone and in combination with INSTIs. This ability was more evident when TAF was used in combination with DTG and BIC. Finally, INSTIs increased the expression of ER-TR7 compared with control and cells treated with TAF or TDF.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the evidence that in-vitro challenge of 3T3-L1 cells with INSTIs is able to increase adipocytic differentiation and to drive a number of these cells toward the expression of fibroblastic features, with a different degree according to the various drugs used whereas TAF and TDF have an antagonistic role on this phenomenon.

Antiviral drugs

In this chapter, we have reviewed side effects reported with the use of antivirals for the treatment of the following infections: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C Virus (HCV), herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2 (HSV-1, -2), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and influenza virus. The search engines PUBMED, EMBASE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) were utilized to identify literature published between January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021.

Bone Quality in Relation to HIV and Antiretroviral Drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

People living with HIV (PLWH) are at an increased risk for osteoporosis, a disease defined by the loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and deterioration of bone quality, both of which independently contribute to an increased risk of skeletal fractures. While there is an emerging body of literature focusing on the factors that contribute to BMD loss in PLWH, the contribution of these factors to bone quality changes are less understood. The current review summarizes and critically reviews the data describing the effects of HIV, HIV disease-related factors, and antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) on bone quality.

RECENT FINDINGS

The increased availability of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography has confirmed that both HIV infection and ARVs negatively affect bone architecture. There is considerably less data on their effects on bone remodeling or the composition of bone matrix. Whether changes in bone quality independently predict fracture risk, as seen in HIV-uninfected populations, is largely unknown. The available data suggests that bone quality deterioration occurs in PLWH. Future studies are needed to define which factors, viral or ARVs, contribute to loss of bone quality and which bone quality factors are most associated with increased fracture risk.