Universal HIV screening in the emergency department: an interrupted time series analysis

An automated best practice advisory increases both routine HIV screening and HIV cotesting with sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in improving routine HIV screening in emergency departments and increasing HIV cotesting rates among patients tested for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), who are considered at elevated risk of acquiring HIV.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all ED encounters at a large, urban emergency departments with an existing HIV screening program for seven months before (November 1, 2018, to May 30, 2019) and after (June 1 to December 31, 2019) the implementation of a best practice advisory prompting universal HIV and syphilis screening.

RESULTS

The study included 14,767 unique encounters, with 3,982 pre-implementation encounters and 10,785 post-implementation. After implementation, HIV testing increased 242%, from 2,851 tests to 9,757, and syphilis testing increased 326%, from 2,191 tests to 9,330. The proportion of encounters for urogenital STI testing without HIV cotesting decreased by 10.3%, from 43.6% to 33.3%.

DISCUSSION

An automated electronic medical record (EMR) prompt can have a huge impact on both HIV and syphilis testing rates, as well as the rate of missed opportunities for cotesting among patients undergoing STI testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals should support screening with automated alerts to help meet quality metrics, improve screening rates, and reduce missed opportunities for screening in vulnerable patients.

Get2PrEP2-A Provider Messaging Strategy to Improve PrEP Uptake: A Randomized Controlled Quality Improvement Project

Introduction

HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a key strategy for preventing HIV transmission, requires awareness and access to PrEP services. Although all patients should be made aware of HIV PrEP; the diagnosis of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is an important indicator of potential HIV PrEP need. In a previous evaluation of Get2PrEP (G2P), we found that an electronic medical record laboratory comments did not increase the frequency of PrEP discussions between patients and providers. In Get2PrEP2 (G2P2), we hypothesized that active, personalized messaging to providers about HIV PrEP would increase the documentation of PrEP discussions, referrals, and/or provision of HIV PrEP to individuals diagnosed with an STI.

Methods

G2P2 was a parallel 3-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled design. Participants were allocated 2:1 to intervention or control. Participants in the intervention arm were further allocated to receive provider messaging through the electronic medical record chat message or e-mail.

Results

The 191 randomized encounters resulted in a modest 7.8% (odds ratio, 1.078; confidence interval, 1.02-1.13) increase in documented PrEP discussions in intervention encounters versus none in the standard care group. There was no statistical difference by intervention modality. All documented discussions occurred in the outpatient or emergency department and were more frequent in women and those aged <25 years.

Discussion

An e-mail or electronic medical record chat message sent to providers of patients testing positive for an STI had a small but significant effect on documented patient-provider PrEP discussions. Further investigation is required to determine whether provider messaging can increase PrEP uptake among eligible patients and longer-term outcomes.

Risk factors for HIV infection at a large urban emergency department: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

In 2019, the US Preventative Services Task Force released updated guidelines recommending HIV screening in all individuals aged 15-64 years and all pregnant females. In the current study, we aimed to identify risk factors for HIV infection in an emergency department (ED) population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study that employed a post hoc risk factor analysis of ED patients ≥18 years who were screened for HIV between 27 November 2018 and 26 November 2019, at a single urban, quaternary referral academic hospital. Patients were screened using HIV antigen/antibody testing and diagnoses were confirmed using HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody testing. The outcome of interest was the number of positive HIV tests. Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors associated with HIV positivity.

RESULTS

14 335 adult patients were screened for HIV (mean age: 43±14 years; 52% female). HIV seroprevalence was 0.7%. Independent risk factors for HIV positivity included male sex (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 5.6)), unhoused status (aOR 2.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 4.9)), history of illicit drug use (aOR 1.8 (95% CI 1.04 to 3.13)) and Medicare insurance status (aOR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.4)).

CONCLUSIONS

The study ED services a high-risk population with regard to HIV infection. These data support universal screening of ED patients for HIV. Risk factor profiles could improve targeted screening at institutions without universal HIV testing protocols.