The impact of paediatric antimicrobial stewardship programmes on patient outcomes

Improved use of antibiotics following implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in a neonatal intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

Inappropriate antibiotic use in infants can have multiple adverse effects and contribute to the development of bacteria resistant to antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship program implemented in 2017 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at The Children's Hospital Iceland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included all infants who were admitted to the NICU during the study period (January 1st 2012-October 31st 2020). Data was collected from hospital records. Three periods were defined: preimplementation (2012-2014), peri-implementation (2015-2016) and postimplementation (2017-October 2020). Antibiotic use was quantified using days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 bed days (BD). For statistical analysis the pre- and postimplementation periods were compared.

RESULTS

Antibiotics were administered in 38.6% (1372) of admissions to the NICU during the study period. Antimicrobial use per year decreased from 584.6 to 317.1 DOT/1000 BD per year (P < 0.001). Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics decreased significantly. The average number of BD per month decreased from 297.8 to 220.9 BD/month (P = 0.0096). There were no significant changes in the length of stay for each infant or the proportion of readmissions or retreatment.

CONCLUSION

Increased awareness of appropriate use of antimicrobials in the NICU led to shorter treatments and less use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. No increase in adverse effects such as readmissions or retreatment was observed.

Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Correct Management to Reduce Sepsis in NICU Settings

The discovery of antimicrobial drugs has led to a significant increase in survival from infections; however, they are very often prescribed and administered, even when their use is not necessary and appropriate. Newborns are particularly exposed to infections due to the poor effectiveness and the immaturity of their immune systems. For this reason, in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), the use of antimicrobial drugs is often decisive and life-saving, and it must be started promptly to ensure its effectiveness in consideration of the possible rapid evolution of the infection towards sepsis. Nevertheless, the misuse of antibiotics in the neonatal period leads not only to an increase in the development and wide spreading of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but it is also associated with various short-term (e.g., alterations of the microbiota) and long-term (e.g., increased risk of allergic disease and obesity) effects. It appears fundamental to use antibiotics only when strictly necessary; specific decision-making algorithms and electronic calculators can help limit the use of unnecessary antibiotic drugs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the right balance between the risks and benefits of antimicrobial therapy in NICUs; for this purpose, specific Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in neonatal care and the creation of a specific antimicrobial stewardship team are requested.

The Burden of Self-Reported Antibiotic Allergies in Health Care and How to Address It: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are the first-line treatment for bacterial infections; however, overuse and inappropriate prescribing have made antibiotics less effective with increased antimicrobial resistance. Unconfirmed reported antibiotic allergy labels create a significant barrier to optimal antimicrobial stewardship in health care, with clinical and economic implications.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was conducted to summarize the impact of patient-reported antibiotic allergy on clinical outcomes and various strategies that have been employed to effectively assess and remove these allergy labels, improving patient care.

METHODS

The review was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A critical appraisal was conducted on all studies and a narrative synthesis was performed to identify themes.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged: the prevalence of antibiotic allergy, impact of antibiotic allergy on antimicrobial prescribing, impact of antibiotic allergy on clinical outcomes, and delabeling strategies to improve clinical outcomes. Of the 32 studies, including 1,089,675 participants, the prevalence of reported antibiotic allergy was between 5% and 35%. Patients with a reported antibiotic allergy had poorer concordance with prescribing guidelines in 30% to 60% of cases, with a higher use of alternatives such as quinolone, tetracycline, macrolide, lincosamide, and carbapenem and lower use of beta-lactam antibiotics. Antibiotic allergy delabeling was identified as an intervention and recommendation to advance the state of the science.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial evidence within the literature that antibiotic allergy labels significantly impact patient clinical outcomes and a consensus that systematic assessment of reported antibiotic allergies, commonly referred to as delabeling, improves the clinical management of patients.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in PICU Settings: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Development of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is strategy for prevention and management of emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature on antimicrobial stewardship interventions in PICUs and analyzed approaches, structure, implementation, and outcomes of the ASPs.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020, reporting interventions on judicious use of antimicrobials in PICUs (last search performed February 28, 2021).

DATA SELECTION

Studies that evaluated an intervention in a PICU setting or both in PICU and other settings and reported separate results for PICU were eligible for full-text review. Studies that had implemented stewardship in the entire hospital, including the PICU, but without presenting dedicated PICU data were excluded from the analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The strategy of intervention, structure of ASP team, implementation, and outcomes were assessed with a checklist tool for all studies included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias in Nonrandomized studies of Interventions tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirteen articles were found: 11 that applied ASP in PICUs, and two at hospital level. All PICU-dedicated ASPs applied a multimodal intervention combining strategies simultaneously; audit with feedback (6/11) and facility-specific clinical practice guidelines (7/11) were the most common strategies. A multidisciplinary team was formulated in all ASPs except for three biomarker-based interventions. Six of 11 studies included techniques to enhance behavior change and one implemented a behavior-based intervention. Antibiotic consumption was evaluated in all ASPs, cost in three of 11, antibiotic resistance in one of 11, length of hospitalization in six of 11, and mortality in eight of 11. All hospital-wide ASPs used audit with feedback in addition to facility-specific clinical practice guidelines and assessed antimicrobial consumption, expenditures, length of stay, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ASPs in PICUs is limited, and few programs follow all of the currently available recommendations.

Effectiveness of an enhanced antibiotic stewardship programme amongst paediatric patients in a tertiary hospital in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the Vietnamese Ministry of Health promoted development of antimicrobial stewardship for hospitals.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the enhanced antibiotic stewardship programme (ASP) compared to the original ASP amongst paediatric patients at a tertiary hospital for infectious diseases in Vietnam.

METHODS

We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to examine antibiotic use in paediatric patients aged 0 to 17 years admitted to the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City from April 2016 to March 2020. Outcomes measured were defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1000 patient-days; antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days; percentage of antibiotic use by the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) system; Access-to-Watch ratio; and worse clinical outcomes at discharge.

FINDINGS

Of 60,172 admissions during the study period, 28,019 received at least one antibiotic (46.6%) during hospital stay. The Watch antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed (78.1% of total antibiotic courses). The enhanced ASP did not improve antibiotic prescribing by DDDs per 1000 patient-days (RR: 1.05, 95%CI: 0.94-1.17) and DOT per 1000 patient-days (RR: 1.11, 95%CI: 0.99-1.25) compared to the original ASP. However, the percentage of Access antibiotics prescribed, and the Access-to-Watch ratio increased after the enhanced ASP (RR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.38-2.17). There was no significant difference in worse clinical outcomes at discharge between the original and enhanced ASP (RR: 1.25, 95%CI: 0.78-2.00).

CONCLUSION

The enhanced ASP had modest impact on antibiotic consumption in paediatric population despite the improvement of Access antibiotic use and the Access-to-Watch ratio.

Biomarker-guided duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Children Hospitalised with confirmed or suspected bacterial infection (BATCH): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker more specific for bacterial infection and responds quicker than other commonly used biomarkers such as C reactive protein, but is not routinely used in the National Health Service (NHS). Studies mainly in adults show that using PCT to guide clinicians may reduce antibiotic use, reduce hospital stay, with no associated adverse effects such as increased rates of hospital re-admission, incomplete treatment of infections, relapse or death. A review conducted for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends further research on PCT testing to guide antibiotic use in children.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Biomarker-guided duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Children Hospitalised with confirmed or suspected bacterial infection is a multi-centre, prospective, two-arm, individually Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) with a 28-day follow-up and internal pilot. The intervention is a PCT-guided algorithm used in conjunction with best practice. The control arm is best practice alone. We plan to recruit 1942 children, aged between 72 hours and up to 18 years old, who are admitted to the hospital and being treated with intravenous antibiotics for suspected or confirmed bacterial infection. Coprimary outcomes are duration of antibiotic use and a composite safety measure. Secondary outcomes include time to switch from broad to narrow spectrum antibiotics, time to discharge, adverse drug reactions, health utility and cost-effectiveness. We will also perform a qualitative process evaluation. Recruitment commenced in June 2018 and paused briefly between March and May 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial protocol was approved by the HRA and NHS REC (North West Liverpool East REC reference 18/NW/0100). We will publish the results in international peer-reviewed journals and present at scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN11369832.

A national, multicentre web-based point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use and quality indices among hospitalised paediatric patients across South Africa

OBJECTIVES

Data on antimicrobial consumption among the paediatric population in public hospitals in South Africa is limited. These needs to be addressed to improve future use and reduce antimicrobial resistance rates. Consequently, the objective is to quantify antimicrobial usage;and identify and classify which antimicrobials are used in the peadiatric population in public sector hospitals in South Africa according to World Health Organiosation (WHO) AWaRe list of antimicrobials METHODS: Conduct a point prevalence survey among 18 public sector hospitals from nine provinces using a newly developed web-based application. The data will be analysed according to the WHO AwaRe list to guide future quality improvement programmes.

RESULTS

1261 paediatric patient files were reviewed with 49.7% (627/1261) receiving at least one antimicrobial, with 1013 antimicrobials prescribed overall. The top five antimicrobials included ampicillin (16.4%), gentamycin (10.0%), amoxicillin and enzyme inhibitor (9.6%), ceftriaxone (7.4%), and amikacin (6.3%). Antimicrobials from the Access classification were the most used (55.9%) with 3.1% being from the Reserve classification. The most common infectious conditions were pneumonia (21.3%; 148/1013) and clinical sepsis (16.0%; 111/1013). Parenteral administration (75.6%) and prolonged surgical prophylaxis (66.7%; 10/15) were common and concerns. 28% of the paediatric patients had cultures requested for them before antimicrobial treatment (284/1013) however only 38.7% (110/284) of culture results were available in the files.

CONCLUSION

Overall, antimicrobial prescribing is common among paediatric patients in South Africa. Interventions should be targeted at improving antimicrobial prescribing, including surgical prophylaxis, and encouraging greater use of oral antibiotics.

Stewardship program on carbapenem prescriptions in a tertiary hospital for adults and children in France: a cohort study

Antimicrobial stewardship programs aim at reducing the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as carbapenems, but their impact remains unclear. We compared the use of carbapenems between paediatric and adult subjects admitted to a French tertiary hospital and described the intervention of an antibiotic stewardship team (AST). As part of AST routine activity, all adult and paediatric patients receiving carbapenems are identified in real time using a computer-generated alert system and reviewed by the AST. Data associated with carbapenem prescriptions were extracted for 2 years (2014-2015) and were compared between paediatric and adult wards. Prescription appropriateness (i.e. no clinically suitable narrower spectrum alternative to carbapenem for de-escalation) and AST intervention were analysed. In total, 775 carbapenem prescriptions for 291 children and 262 adults were included. Most patients (95%) had a comordity and 52% had known recent carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE). Most carbapenem prescriptions came from intensive care units (n = 269, 35%) and were initiated for urinary tract (n = 200, 27%), sepsis (n = 181, 25%), and lung (n = 153, 21%) infections. Carbapenems were initiated empirically in 537 (70%) cases, and an organism was isolated in 523 (67%) cases. Among the isolated organisms, 47% (n = 246) were ESBLE and 90% (n = 468) were susceptible to carbapenems, but an alternative existed in 61% (n = 320) of cases according to antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among prescriptions reviewed by the AST, 39% (n = 255) were considered non-appropriate and led to either antibiotic discontinuation (n = 47, 7%) or de-escalation (n = 208, 32%). Non-appropriate prescriptions were more frequent in paediatric wards (p = 0.01) and in microbiologically documented infections (p = 0.013), and less observed in immunocompromised patients (p = 0.009) or with a known ESBLE carriage (p < 0.001). Tailored stewardship programs are essential to better control carbapenem use and subsequent antimicrobial resistance.

Prevalence of medication discrepancies in pediatric patients transferred between hospital wards

Background Children are more susceptible to harm from medication errors and adverse drug reactions when compared to adults. Such events may occur from medication discrepancies while transitioning patients throughout the healthcare system. Contributing factors include medication discontinuity and lack of information by the healthcare team. Objective To analyze the prevalence of medication discrepancies in transition points of care in a pediatric department. Setting Pediatric department of a public hospital in Northeast Brazil. Method A cross-sectional study was carried out from August 2017 to March 2018. Data collection consisted of the following steps: collection of sociodemographic data, clinical interview with the patient's caregiver, registration of patient prescriptions, and evaluation of medical records. Medication discrepancies were classified as intentional and unintentional. The unintentional medication discrepancies were classified as omission of medication, therapeutic duplicity, and differences in dose, frequency, or route of administration. Main outcomes measure Discrepancy profile identified at admission, internal transfer and hospital discharge. Results Among the 114 patients included in the study, 85 (74.5%) patients had at least one unintentional medication discrepancy, of which 16 (14.0%) patients presented medication discrepancies at hospital admission, 42 (36.8%) patients at internal transfer, and 52 (45.6%) patients during discharge. Omission of medication represented 20 (74.1%) errors at admission, 26 (37.7%) errors at internal transfer, and 80 (100.0%) errors at hospital discharge. Conclusions The main transition points of care where unintentional discrepancies occurred in the studied pediatric department were at internal transfer and hospital discharge, with omission being the most common type of unintentional discrepancy.

A Survey on National Pediatric Antibiotic Stewardship Programs, Networks and Guidelines in 23 European Countries

BACKGROUND

Misuse, overuse of antimicrobials and increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance are well-recognized problems throughout Europe. The aim of this survey was to describe the current pediatric antibiotic stewardship (PAS) landscape across Europe and identify gaps, in terms of national programs, networks and guidelines.

METHODS

A survey of 17 questions was circulated in July 2019 among 24 European pediatric infectious disease researchers and clinicians, professors and heads of department on the existence of PAS programs, national networks and meetings, established competencies, metrics and guidelines.

RESULTS

We received responses from 23 countries. National guidelines on the management of children with common infections treated in hospital settings exist in 15 of 23 (70%); only 8 of 15 (53%) had been updated within the previous 4 years. Most provide guidance on antibiotic initiation and duration (14 of 15, 93%), but few on when to transition from intravenous to oral antibiotics (7 of 15, 47%). National PAS competencies have only been developed in 4 countries; only 1 addressed both community and hospital prescribing. Organized national PAS networks are only established in the United Kingdom and Germany; 21 of 23, 91% countries had no agreed metric for antibiotic prescribing in children; 2 of 23 were based on daily defined doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Fragmented implementation of PAS programs, no agreed metrics, lack of established PAS competencies and national PAS networks along with inexistent funding is alarming in view of existing high rates of antimicrobial resistance in Europe.

Paediatric antimicrobial stewardship programmes in the UK's regional children's hospitals

A survey was conducted in UK regional children's hospitals with paediatric intensive care and paediatric infectious disease (PID) departments to describe the characteristics of paediatric antimicrobial stewardship (PAS) programmes. A structured questionnaire was sent to PAS coordinators. 'Audit and feedback' was implemented in 13 out of 17 centres. Microbiology-led services were more likely to implement antimicrobial restriction (75% vs 33% in PID-led services), to focus on broad-spectrum antibiotics, and to review patients with positive blood cultures. PID-led services were more likely to identify patients from e-prescribing or drug charts and review all antimicrobials. A PAS network has been established.

Prospective monitoring of carbapenem use and pseudomonal resistance across pediatric institutions

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether carbapenem consumption and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance rates can be used as benchmarks to compare and improve antimicrobial stewardship programs across multiple pediatric hospitals.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Healthcare institutions in Japan with >100 pediatric beds.

METHODS

An annual survey of the total days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days for carbapenem antibiotics (meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, panipenem-betamipron, doripenem) and susceptibility rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin from each institution was conducted over a 7-year period. Data were reported to the administration, as well as to the infection control team, of each institution annually.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 32 facilities. The median total carbapenem DOT per 1,000 patient days was 16.6 and varied widely, with a range of 2.7 to 59.0. The median susceptibility to meropenem was 86.6%, ranging from 78.6% to 96.6%. We detected an inverse correlation between total carbapenem DOT versus susceptibility (r = - 0.36; P < .01). Over the 7-year period, the DOT per 1,000 patient days of carbapenem decreased by 27% from a median of 16.0 to 11.7 (P < .01). We also observed an improvement in susceptibility to meropenem from a median of 87% to 89.7% (P = .01) and to imipenem-cilastatin from 79% to 85% (P < .01). The decreases in the use of carbapenem were greater in institutions with antimicrobial stewardship programs led by pediatric infectious disease specialists.

CONCLUSIONS

Antimicrobial use and resistance, targeting carbapenems and P. aeruginosa, respectively, can serve as benchmarks that can be utilized to promote antimicrobial stewardship across pediatric healthcare institutions.

Antimicrobial stewardship in children: more shadows than lights?

Introduction: The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes in the pediatric population in improving clinical outcomes, altering prescribing behavior, controlling antimicrobial resistance and measuring the cost-effectiveness.Areas covered: Medline Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched on 30 September 2018 combining MeSH and free terms for 'antimicrobial stewardship', 'clinical outcomes', 'antimicrobial resistance', 'cost-effectiveness' and 'prescribing behavior'. Several studies have been conducted on the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in children, which showed a positive impact on length of hospital stay and days of therapy. Together with ASP bundles, the introduction of fast microbiology and point-of-care tests showed a positive impact in terms of rapid identification of the pathogen, time to optimal antimicrobial therapy and reduction of antibiotic use, without worsening clinical outcomes. These improvements turned out to be limited over time. Conflicting results were observed regarding the impact of ASPs on antimicrobial resistance and on cost-effectiveness and cost-benefits, due to the lack of homogeneity between studies.Expert opinion: Evidence regarding the impact of ASPs in children is limited to single center studies, with different study designs, making it impossible to draw unequivocal conclusions. High quality studies are needed. More feasable approaches should be designed both for inpatients and outpatients and for critical patients.

Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over recent years, there has been a marked increase in the number of centres delivering paediatric outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (pOPAT). Various factors have fuelled this drive, including the significant economic pressures faced by high-income countries to contain the cost of healthcare, resulting in a significant reduction of in-patient beds over the past 20 years. It is essential that pOPAT services have formal clinical governance structures in place to ensure the safe and effective management of children being ambulated on intravenous antibiotics. They also require oversight of antimicrobial decisions by a medically qualified infection specialist to ensure that the principles of antimicrobial stewardship are adhered to. This review aims to provide an evidence-based framework for delivering pOPAT services.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is increasing data supporting the implementation of admission avoidance strategies for children with cellulitis and pyelonephritis. In addition, recent data supports the management of a subset of children with febrile neutropenia within pOPAT services. Above all, there is a clear recognition that embedding antimicrobial stewardship within pOPAT services reduces duration of intravenous antibiotics (IVAbs) and improves patient management. pOPAT services are safe, cost-effective and associated with high levels of parent/patient satisfaction. Further research is required to develop risk prediction models for children being considered for pOPAT. Further data about the use of elastomeric devices in children and the acceptability of parental administration of IVAbs are also required.

Trends in the use of antibiotics among Korean children

Inappropriate antibiotic use is the most important factor causing increased bacterial resistance to antibiotics, thus affecting patient outcomes. Multidrug-resistant bacteria have become a serious public health threat, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. In Korea, the burden of antibioticresistant bacteria has become an important public health issue. There is increasing evidence of overuse and misuse of antibiotics in Korea, as observed in cohorts with large sample sizes. Antibiotic use among children should receive particular attention because of the frequency of community-associated infections among this population and the elevated risk of transmission. Recent studies from Korea have demonstrated that the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, either for inpatient or outpatient treatment, has increased among many age groups, especially children. In this review, we aim to describe the patterns of antibiotic prescription and evaluate recent trends in antibiotic use among children. Coordinated efforts toward communication and education in order to address misunderstandings regarding antibiotic use, involving interprofessional antimicrobial stewardship programs, are required in the near future.