Tofacitinib 5 mg Twice Daily in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety

Updates on efficacy and safety janus kinase inhibitors in juvenile dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare autoimmune disease most commonly with proximal weakness due to inflammation and characteristic skin rashes. Most patients have a chronic or polycyclic disease course on standard therapy so better treatments are needed. An interferon signature is well-established in key tissues of JDM. Janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs), which can decrease IFN signaling, are therefore appealing as a targeted therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Herein is a review of the growing literature on JDM patients in jakinibs, including specifics of their jakinib exposure, summary of efficacy, disease features, and characteristics of patients treated, and safety parameters.

EXPERT OPINION

The vast majority of refractory JDM patients respond to jakinib therapy, though they have varied features, doses, and previous/concurrent medications, and data is largely retrospective. Jakinibs are an exciting and promising treatment in JDM. Evaluation with larger prospective controlled studies is needed to answer remaining questions about jakinibs in JDM regarding dosing, which JDM patients to treat with jakinibs, potential biomarkers to use, and how best to monitor safety risks in JDM.

Tofacitinib pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

These analyses characterized tofacitinib pharmacokinetics (PKs) in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Data were pooled from phase I (NCT01513902), phase III (NCT02592434), and open-label, long-term extension (NCT01500551) studies of tofacitinib tablet/solution (weight-based doses administered twice daily [b.i.d.]) in patients with JIA aged 2 to less than 18 years. Population PK modeling used a nonlinear mixed-effects approach, with covariates identified using stepwise forward-inclusion backward-deletion procedures. Simulations were performed to derive dosing recommendations for children and adolescents with JIA. Two hundred forty-six pediatric patients were included in the population PK model. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination and absorption with body weight as a covariate for oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution sufficiently described the data. Oral solution was associated with comparable average concentration (Cavg) and slightly higher (113.9%) maximum concentration (Cmax) versus tablet, which was confirmed by a subsequent randomized, open-label, bioavailability study conducted in healthy adult participants (n = 12) by demonstrating adjusted geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) between oral solution and tablet of 1.04 (1.00-1.09) and 1.10 (1.00-1.21) for area under the curve extrapolated to infinity and Cmax, respectively (NCT04111614). A dosing regimen of 3.2 mg b.i.d. solution in patients 10 to less than 20 kg, 4 mg b.i.d. solution in patients 20 to less than 40 kg, and 5 mg b.i.d. tablet/solution in patients greater than or equal to 40 kg, irrespective of age, was proposed to achieve constant Cavg across weight groups. In summary, population PK characterization informed a simplified tofacitinib dosing regimen that has been implemented in pediatric patients with JIA.

Clinical scenarios-based guide for tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis

Tofacitinib was the first Janus kinase inhibitor to be approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and there is a large body of data to inform the efficacy and safety of this drug for patients at different places in their treatment journeys and with diverse demographics and characteristics. Here, we summarize tofacitinib clinical efficacy and safety data from some clinical trials, post hoc analyses, and real-world studies, which provide evidence of the efficacy of tofacitinib in treating patients with RA at various stages of their treatment journeys, and with differentiating baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, race, and body mass index. In addition, we review the safety data available from different patient subpopulations in the tofacitinib clinical development program, real-world data, and findings from the ORAL Surveillance post-marketing safety study that included patients aged ⩾50 years with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. The available efficacy and safety data in these subpopulations can enable better discussions between clinicians and patients to guide informed decision-making and individualized patient care.

The trajectory of clinical responses in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who achieve sustained remission in response to abatacept: subanalysis of AVERT-2, a randomized phase IIIb study

BACKGROUND

AVERT-2 (a phase IIIb, two-stage study) evaluated abatacept + methotrexate versus methotrexate alone, in methotrexate-naive, anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive patients with early (≤ 6 months), active RA. This subanalysis investigated whether individual patients who achieved the week 24 Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission primary endpoint could sustain remission to 1 year and then maintain it following changes in therapy.

METHODS

During the 56-week induction period (IP), patients were randomized to weekly subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg + methotrexate or abatacept placebo + methotrexate. Patients completing the IP who achieved SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at weeks 40 and 52 entered a 48-week de-escalation (DE) period. Patients treated with abatacept + methotrexate were re-randomized to continue weekly abatacept + methotrexate, or de-escalate and then withdraw abatacept (after 24 weeks), or receive abatacept monotherapy. Proportions of patients achieving sustained SDAI and Boolean remission, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28 [CRP]) < 2.6, were assessed. For patients achieving early sustained SDAI remission at weeks 24/40/52, flow between disease activity categories and individual trajectories was evaluated; flow was also evaluated for later remitters (weeks 40/52 but not week 24).

RESULTS

Among patients treated with abatacept + methotrexate (n/N = 451/752) at IP week 24, 22% achieved SDAI remission, 17% achieved Boolean remission, and 42% achieved DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6; of these, 56%, 58%, and 74%, respectively, sustained a response throughout IP weeks 40/52. Among patients with a sustained response at IP weeks 24/40/52, 82% (14/17) on weekly abatacept + methotrexate, 81% (13/16) on abatacept monotherapy, 63% (12/19) who de-escalated/withdrew abatacept, and 65% (11/17) on abatacept placebo + methotrexate were in SDAI remission at end of the DE period; rates were higher than for later remitters in all arms except abatacept placebo + methotrexate.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of individual patients achieving clinical endpoints at IP week 24 with abatacept + methotrexate sustained their responses through week 52. Of patients achieving early and sustained SDAI remission through 52 weeks, numerically more maintained remission during the DE period if weekly abatacept treatment continued.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02504268 (ClinicalTrials.gov), registered July 21, 2015.

Update on the role of upadacitinib in the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

With further knowledge of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, small oral molecules have become available, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor and has become the newest drug in this class, with recent approval for the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The large phase III program (including the U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH parallel induction trials and the U-ACHIEVE Maintenance trial) demonstrated superiority over placebo, for all primary and secondary endpoints including key clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes utilizing 45 mg orally (po) once daily (OD) during induction and either 30 mg or 15 mg po OD in maintenance. From a safety perspective, UPA has proven to be a safe and well-tolerated medication across immune-mediated diseases with manageable adverse risks such as an increase in herpes zoster. Proper discussion and patient profiling are essential when positioning UPA, considering efficacy and potential risks associated with this highly effective medication.

Combination of Dexamethasone and Tofacitinib Reduces Xenogeneic MSC-Induced Immune Responses in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

We have recently reported on how transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the mouse parenchyma generated immune responses. To facilitate the clinical translation of MSC-based AD therapy, the safety and efficacy of human derived MSCs (hMSCs) must be confirmed in the pre-clinical stage. Thus, it is imperative to investigate measures to reduce immune responses exerted via xenotransplantation. In this study, immunosuppressants were co-administered to mice that had received injections of hMSCs into the parenchyma. Prior to performing experiments using transgenic AD mice (5xFAD), varying immunosuppressant regimens were tested in wild-type (WT) mice and the combination of dexamethasone and tofacitinib (DexaTofa) revealed to be effective in enhancing the persistence of hMSCs. According to transcriptome sequencing and immunohistochemical analyses, administration of DexaTofa reduced immune responses generated via transplantation of hMSCs in the parenchyma of 5xFAD mice. Significant mitigation of amyloid burden, however, was not noted following transplantation of hMSCs alone or hMSCs with DexaTofa. The efficacy of the immunosuppressant regimen should be tested in multiple AD mouse models to promote its successful application and use in AD stem cell therapy.

Real-World Evidence to Contextualize Clinical Trial Results and Inform Regulatory Decisions: Tofacitinib Modified-Release Once-Daily vs Immediate-Release Twice-Daily for Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To provide additional clinical evidence in regulatory submissions for a modified-release (MR) once-daily (QD) tofacitinib formulation, we compared real-world adherence and effectiveness between patients initiating the MR QD formulation and patients initiating an immediate-release (IR) twice-daily (BID) formulation.

METHODS

Two noninterventional cohort studies were conducted. First, adherence and two effectiveness proxies were compared between patients with RA who newly initiated tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD or IR 5 mg BID in the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental US insurance claims databases (March 2016-October 2018). Second, using data collected in the Corrona US RA Registry (February 2016-August 2019), two Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-based measures of effectiveness were compared between tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD and IR 5 mg BID, and against noninferiority criteria derived from placebo-controlled clinical trials of the tofacitinib IR formulation. Multiple sensitivity analyses of the registry data were conducted to reassure regulators of consistent results across different assumptions.

RESULTS

In each study, approximately two-thirds of patients initiated the MR formulation. In the claims database study, improved adherence and at least comparable effectiveness were observed with tofacitinib MR vs IR over 12 months, particularly in patients without prior advanced therapy. In the registry study, the noninferiority of tofacitinib MR vs IR was demonstrated for both CDAI outcomes at ~6 months; this finding was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the value of real-world evidence from complementary data sources in understanding the impact of medication adherence with a QD formulation in clinical practice. These analyses were suitable for regulatory consideration as an important component of evidence for the comparability of tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD vs IR 5 mg BID in patients with RA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Claims database study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04018001, retrospectively registered July 12, 2019. Corrona US RA Registry study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04267380, retrospectively registered February 12, 2020.

Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3)

Objectives

To investigate the efficacy and safety of peficitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

In this double-blind phase III study, patients with RA and an inadequate response to prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were randomised to peficitinib 100 mg once daily, peficitinib 150 mg once daily, placebo or open-label etanercept for 52 weeks’ treatment; placebo-treated patients were switched at week 12 to peficitinib 100 or 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response at week 12/early termination (ET). Secondary endpoints (assessed throughout) included ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response, changes from baseline in disease activity scores (DAS)28 and ACR core parameters, adverse events (AEs) and changes in clinical or laboratory measurements.

Results

In total, 507 patients received treatment. ACR20 response rates at week 12/ET were significantly higher in the peficitinib 100 mg (57.7%) and 150 mg (74.5%) groups versus placebo (30.7%) (p<0.001). ACR50/70 response rates were also higher for both peficitinib doses versus placebo. Improvements in ACR response were maintained until week 52. Changes from baseline in DAS28-C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the ACR core set were significantly greater for both peficitinib doses versus placebo at week 12/ET (p<0.001). AE incidence was similar across treatment arms. Incidence of serious infection and herpes zoster-related disease was higher with peficitinib versus placebo, but with no clear dose-dependent increase.

Conclusions

In patients with RA and inadequate response to DMARDs, peficitinib 100 mg once daily or 150 mg once daily was efficacious in reducing RA symptoms and was well tolerated compared with placebo.

Trial registration number

NCT02308163.